In Indonesia for the Philippine Navy a dock ship was launched

23
At the shipyard of the Indonesian state company PT PAL, the landing ship dock (DCD) LD 601 Tarlac under construction for the Philippines has been launched, the overall technical readiness of which was 85%, the blog reports bmpd.

In Indonesia for the Philippine Navy a dock ship was launched


Delivery of the ship to the customer is scheduled for the end of May of this year. The contract for the construction of the 2-DKD was signed at the beginning of 2014. Its cost is about $ 91 million.

“PT PAL Indonesia won an international tender held by the Philippines for a ship project, which is, in fact, a reduced modification of the Makassar-class DKD built for the Indonesian Navy under the project of the South Korean corporation Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME). The contract for the construction of two SSV ships for the Philippines was the most significant export success of the Indonesian shipbuilding industry in the entire history"- said the blogger, with reference to the Philippine media.

After launching the lead ship into the water, the shipyard began cutting steel for the 2 DDC.

Help bmpd: "The DKD under construction for the Philippine Navy has a total displacement of about 7000 tons, a length of 123 m and a width of 21,8 m. The power plant includes two B&W 9L38 / 32A medium-speed diesel engines with 3000 hp each, providing a speed of up to 16 knots. The ship has a dock chamber for basing two LCU-23M landing boats, a cargo hold and is capable of carrying up to 520 airborne troops and 2800 tons of cargo. The flight deck has two landing pads for Sikorsky UH-60 class helicopters. The armament of the ship, at the request of the Philippines, should include one medium-caliber universal artillery mount (presumably 76-mm Oto Melara Compact) and two 30-mm artillery mounts. "

  • adroth.ph
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -11
    21 January 2016 15: 55
    Well, if they have a US base on their territory, then we will sink them. In vain try the Filipinos!
    1. +3
      21 January 2016 16: 03
      Well, if they have a US base on their territory, then we will sink them. In vain try the Filipinos!

      Then the news passed, supposedly in the territory of the SAR the American base is also being built. Che, in Syria, too, fucking ?! wassat
      1. +12
        21 January 2016 16: 07
        away from the essence! wink
        I have a question, 100500 times each of us crushed him, at least to himself - really the St. Petersburg shipyards or "Yantar" can not rivet a dozen of the same boxes (performance characteristics are almost identical), than our shipyards are worse? recourse
        py.s. do not judge strictly, my opinion, the question is VERY correct! winked
        1. +1
          21 January 2016 16: 22
          Quote: makst83
          I have a question, 100500 times each of us crushed him, at least to himself - really the St. Petersburg shipyards or "Yantar" can not rivet a dozen of the same boxes (performance characteristics are almost identical), than our shipyards are worse?

          Isn't it clear? And when they write - "Yes, we don't need it ...", I remember the catch phrase of the second lieutenant from the "White sun of the desert" - "He has the wrong system of grenades. ...." smile
          By the way, how is Gren doing there?
        2. +2
          21 January 2016 16: 24
          100500 times each of us crushed him, at least to himself - really the St. Petersburg shipyards or "Yantar" can not rivet a dozen of the same boxes (practically identical), than our shipyards are worse?

          Peter is not enough. He knew how to build a fleet. Apparently, the fleet is not nice to Putin.
        3. +2
          21 January 2016 18: 33
          Anyone can put together a box at home ... Here you need a project, a shipyard, a bunch of forever leading subcontractors, specialists, etc. .. It wouldn’t hurt the engines (but there aren’t any ..), would you put them on the completed buildings .. Continue the list ?? at the top of the list would put the gallows with the dangling hunchback and the Yeltsin team of liberals ...
          Quote: makst83
          away from the essence! wink
          I have a question, 100500 times each of us crushed him, at least to himself - really the St. Petersburg shipyards or "Yantar" can not rivet a dozen of the same boxes (performance characteristics are almost identical), than our shipyards are worse? recourse
          py.s. do not judge strictly, my opinion, the question is VERY correct! winked
      2. -1
        21 January 2016 16: 39
        Quote: Wiruz
        Che, in Syria, too, fucking ?!

        So already hollowed out :-)
    2. +2
      21 January 2016 16: 04
      They buy them to butt with the PLA for the disputed islands and sea zones. Also, they already have 1 island with Muslims, Villat announced and swore allegiance to IS.
  2. +2
    21 January 2016 15: 55
    Work great however.
    1. +9
      21 January 2016 16: 02
      In the next topic about Sigma, I wrote:
      2 ship stung to 4bn Philippine wrappers (91 million dollars!).
      2015 began cutting metal in January - a descent in a year! Box 7k!

      In essence, the DKVD is a Makasar project (two of them were bought by Peru, well, the Philippines 2), the project was done by South Koreans, actively using civilian technologies, the goal is simple:
      To create an ultra-cheap (about 40 million for the basic kit) DKVD for the 1 battalion with helicopters, autonomy and the capabilities of an adult ship, which would be built quickly, without any special requirements, was modular (Indonesians have a 4 ship, each does not look like the next, there is a small one with 1 platform, 592 and 593 cases in general on 3 helipads).
  3. +5
    21 January 2016 15: 57
    Similar ships and we need to build to replace the BDK. No, I am not against UDC with a continuous flight deck, but how many x will be built? Four? Well six at best. But such landing ships need to be built in larger numbers, and for all fleets. What will go to Syria! laughing
    1. +5
      21 January 2016 18: 11
      Our local "experts" have long explained that we have "no tasks" for such ships. Such is the squiggle, nothing can be done - only BDK, only hardcore.
    2. 0
      21 January 2016 19: 17
      Quote: Wiruz
      No, I am not against UDC with a continuous flight deck, but how many x will be built? Four? Well six at best

      And no more. The Mistrals also planned only four.
    3. -1
      21 January 2016 21: 44
      You definitely don’t need more - the RF has not a lot of marines, only 8000, and not all paratroopers. If you make room in the cockpits, you would have drowned in just two KABs in just 2 ...
  4. 0
    21 January 2016 15: 57
    The article does not say anything about how many tanks / armored personnel carriers it can carry. Nobody will enlighten?
    1. +2
      21 January 2016 16: 07
      up to 40 infantry vehicles

      There inside the 2 TDCs are still quite large.
  5. +2
    21 January 2016 15: 59
    It seems that the landing over the horizon is now a priority. Even such small ships are imprisoned for this.
    1. +1
      21 January 2016 16: 05
      What does this have to do with it? The Philippines is like an island state. Not every coast of their own country is equipped with a pier for receiving ships. Here you have the need to have DCD.
      1. +2
        21 January 2016 16: 39
        Do we have every shore? or shore of a likely enemy? My post was to the fact that all over the world they depart from landing ships with a direct landing on the shore, in the direction of over-horizon landing. That is, DKD or UDC replace the usual BDK, like our long-suffering Grena. Which, after so many years of construction, becomes an obsolete ship in its essence
        1. -2
          21 January 2016 21: 52
          And what's the point in it? Aviation will reach the horizon ...
          1. -1
            21 January 2016 23: 06
            in general, barges / lighters simply make it possible to land on a shallow shallow shore, modern BDKs can do this with almost the same success

            The only combat landing with the DKD was the Falkdends, the ships approached the shore so that the barges scurried faster and there was nothing beyond the horizon.
            the British, waiting for the moment, hung around the islands before this for three weeks and swore that they did not have nose ramps wassat

            let you minusvalschiki will somehow go from military practice ...

            With the use of LCAC, too, you can’t make a lot of things over the horizon and need separate vessels for their transportation, then it’s better to use ekranoplans, where are they? There were 5 pieces ...
  6. -1
    21 January 2016 16: 17
    Well, buy a couple of these from Philippine, at cost!
  7. +2
    21 January 2016 16: 19
    Dear ones, here’s an example of exactly the right approach to building and strategy of the fleet, clearly, precisely, extremely clear, cheap, and what’s more, it’s just that the technology has been well noticed from the civilian with minimal alterations to the military, and we are only thinking about starting our development since 2030 (from the Gaidar forum)
    1. 0
      21 January 2016 16: 39
      Explain the example: Never compare the ships of the Navy and civilian troughs (ice on board)
      1. 0
        21 January 2016 18: 19
        Quote: VALERIK_097
        Never compare Navy ships and civilian troughs (ice on board)

        VALERIK! On civilians, too, people walk alive! Why would this "ice floe in their side" ???
      2. -1
        21 January 2016 20: 20
        Quote: VALERIK_097
        Explain the example: Never compare the ships of the Navy and civilian troughs (ice on board)


        How special is the tactics of using a landing dock ship that civilian technologies cannot be used in the construction of its hull?

        In my opinion, there is not a single obstacle to this.
  8. +2
    21 January 2016 22: 14
    Already Asian islanders are building a DVDK. Well, by 2030 we are immediately an aircraft carrier. Probably. If we want. Maybe.
    The glory of United Russia is all for the election !!!!! Maybe they will add money from PLATO for good (in the sense of an aircraft carrier), or from auctions to gasoline with diesel fuel ?!
    wow ... backing track ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"