Military Review

RT: The United States is busy restoring the infrastructure of the airfield in northeastern Syria

47
TV channel Russia Today publishes material, which refers to the modernization of one of the airfields in the north-east of Syria. It is noteworthy that the modernization is carried out by US military personnel. The correspondent of the TV channel Murad Gazdiev reports that Washington did not apply to Damascus to use this airfield, and is working outside the framework of international norms and elementary respect for the sovereignty of Syria.


According to RT, work to restore the runway and other infrastructure facilities of the airfield is being carried out near the city of Al-Hasak (near the Syrian-Iraqi border). This area, according to some sources, is controlled by Kurdish armed forces, which oppose the militants of the so-called Islamic State.

RT: The United States is busy restoring the infrastructure of the airfield in northeastern Syria


It must be recalled that in the fall of 2015, Washington announced the shipment of American troops to Iraq. The official goal is the education and training of Iraqi troops for the anti-terrorist struggle. Such a struggle, as announced by the Americans, should be fought along the vector "Ramadi (Iraq) - Ar Raqqa (Syria)". Now it becomes clear that the special forces could have been used to cover the reconstruction work of the airfield, which the US, it seems, is going to use for its own purposes. Everything is in the spirit of a state accustomed to opening a “second front” at a convenient time for itself ...
Photos used:
@irhab020
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 21 January 2016 14: 00
    17
    But I did not understand this? Who allowed? Who let it go?
    1. The black
      The black 21 January 2016 14: 03
      36
      Well, apparently an exclusive nation does not need permission ..... here is another confirmation that there is no international law, no, there was not and will not be hi
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 21 January 2016 14: 06
        +9
        Quote: Black
        there is no international law, no, there never was and never will be

        Why then? It was and is - the right of the strong. But whether it will be in the future or will the "world hegemon" break down is a question.
        But in fact: to dismantle this American construction battalion and deal with the end. So that it was not good.
        1. The black
          The black 21 January 2016 14: 08
          +4
          Well, I do not argue about the right of the strong. So it is. But there is no international law ... wink
      2. andre
        andre 21 January 2016 14: 07
        +3
        Apparently agreed on everything !!! And right it is, left !!
      3. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 21 January 2016 14: 16
        +3
        That is, concrete-piercing ammunition ... yes
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 21 January 2016 14: 43
          +4
          Quote: Observer 33
          That is, concrete-piercing ammunition ... yes

          .. and TU 22M3, just a stone's throw from Mozdok .. hi .. there was an emergency reset .. well, excuse me, it happened .. there was only a couple, think 44 tones .. laughing .. but, seriously ... the mattresses choked on all of Syria and are now trying to ate a piece in the form of Syrian Kurdistan .. not in vain on the border with Iraq .. oh, how they want a corridor from Iraq to Turkey .. hi
      4. givigor71
        givigor71 21 January 2016 14: 37
        +3
        Quote: Black
        Well, apparently an exclusive nation does not need permission ..... here is another confirmation that there is no international law, no, there was not and will not be hi

        And what is it - "international law" in the modern world wink
        1. The black
          The black 21 January 2016 16: 18
          +2
          ... I said - there is no such right ..... in the modern world wink
      5. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 21 January 2016 14: 59
        +5
        Quote: Black
        Well, apparently an exclusive nation does not need permission ..... here is another confirmation that there is no international law, no, there was not and will not be

        Well, ISIS now also has an airfield with airplanes. Our more worries will be added ...

        And why not really ask - and who allowed you to build and restore something there? With whom did America agree on this? She decided or ISIS prompted?
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 21 January 2016 15: 05
          +4
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Well, ISIS now also has an airfield with airplanes.

          The Kurds will supply. ISIS is merged, now the stake on Kurdistan is formed at the expense of the territories of Iraq and Syria, which the latter naturally will not like.
          If ISIS is squeezed, then the second series of conflict will still take place.
          1. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 21 January 2016 16: 15
            +3
            Quote: GRAY
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Well, ISIS now also has an airfield with airplanes.

            The Kurds will supply.

            I just remembered the old joke.
            A new Russian approaches the forest with a PKK. Grandfather is sitting on a stump. HP asks:
            - Grandfather, where is this bear here?
            - And why do you need it?
            - So I am a hunter, I will hunt!
            - You can’t hunt a bear! He is the OWNER! My grandfather walked with a horn, my father walked with a horn - to no avail.
            - Come on, grandfather! I got out! - and pats his PKK.
            - Well, go vooooon there ...

            HP left, and grandfather sits and talks to himself.
            - Well! Now you can’t get into the forest at all. The bear had two slingshots, and now there will be a better machine gun ...


            I mean, the Americans dropped-dropped weapons do not understand who, but now they are also building an airfield with planes ... laughing
      6. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 21 January 2016 17: 55
        0
        Quote: Black
        Well, apparently an exclusive nation does not need permission ..... here is another confirmation that there is no international law, no, there was not and will not be hi


        It makes sense to accidentally bomb on this airdrome to check for exclusivity.
    2. GRAY
      GRAY 21 January 2016 14: 07
      +2
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      But I did not understand this? Who allowed? Who let it go?

      No one was asked. They’ve come in.
      Kassad has interesting material on this subject:
      http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2578936.html
    3. Oleneboy_
      Oleneboy_ 21 January 2016 14: 31
      +2
      I agree ... the Yankees again did not care
    4. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 21 January 2016 18: 50
      0
      I know where you can miss Caliber .... Well, by chance, pieces 15-20 ... Definitely a failure in navigation ....
    5. sherp2015
      sherp2015 21 January 2016 23: 29
      +1
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      But I did not understand this? Who allowed? Who let it go?


      ERASE ... !!
  2. Woodman
    Woodman 21 January 2016 14: 02
    12
    Russia Today TV channel is releasing material that talks about the modernization of one of the airfields in northeast Syria. It is noteworthy that the modernization is carried out by the US Armed Forces. TV channel correspondent Murad Gazdiev reports that Washington did not request Damascus to use this airfield, and is working outside the framework of international standards and basic respect for the sovereignty of Syria.


    Now they will make a base there, figs then you will expel them from Syria ...
    1. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 21 January 2016 15: 06
      -2
      ..... Now they will make a base there, figs then you will expel them from Syria ...

      .... And VKS what ???? .... laughing .... Moreover, one can always say that the bearded were bombed ..... Yes, and supplying the base is such a troublesome thing ..... Look across Afghanistan .... If it weren’t for the corridor through Russia, there would be big losses through Pakistan. .... lol
  3. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 21 January 2016 14: 03
    +7
    But this is an act of aggression
    1. Delink
      Delink 21 January 2016 14: 06
      +4
      Amerikosy will nevertheless deny themselves by presenting information that the territory was not under Assad’s control.
      1. theadenter
        theadenter 21 January 2016 14: 39
        +1
        Or they will say: "the legitimate representatives of the authorities (read Daesh) approved the construction." And tame European dogs will obediently pick up.
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 21 January 2016 14: 38
      +6
      Quote: Bulrumeb
      But this is an act of aggression

      Yes, it seems, in accordance with the autumn decision of the UN Security Council at the initiative of Russia, they have the right. And since the Americans became more active, the ISIS song in Syria is singing the last verse. Yankees do not go for breakfast or lunch. Immediately towards the end of dinner and require a piece of fatter
  4. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 21 January 2016 14: 05
    +3
    This check must be countered.
    1. Woodman
      Woodman 21 January 2016 14: 08
      +5
      Equip the air base in Alaska)))
  5. k19
    k19 21 January 2016 14: 07
    +2
    Or maybe throw a "grenade" there?
  6. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 21 January 2016 14: 10
    +5
    Plant a pig at the table, she and her feet on the table.
  7. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 21 January 2016 14: 13
    +2
    We need to create a no-fly zone there for the Yankees and other dishonesty, or let them knock them down for good. We don’t hang portraits of Assad and Putin in their white house, for now ...
  8. SAM 5
    SAM 5 21 January 2016 14: 13
    +2
    US is busy rebuilding airdrome infrastructure in northeast Syria

    P. Indos settle for a long time. And it would be ridiculous to think that even after the defeat of the Islamic State, they would not have been dumped from such a tidbit.
  9. Dezinto
    Dezinto 21 January 2016 14: 14
    +3
    They allowed themselves.

    "UN - who are the UN ?, observers - which observers ?, red cross - who is the red cross? Hospital? - which hospital? Water supply? - which water supply?"

    Do not bother we are building an airfield for igil.
    1. cap
      cap 21 January 2016 20: 20
      0
      Quote: DEZINTO
      They allowed themselves.

      "UN - who are the UN ?, observers - which observers ?, red cross - who is the red cross? Hospital? - which hospital? Water supply? - which water supply?"

      Do not bother we are building an airfield for igil.


      And Vaska listens and eats. The guilt has become the norm. Shame on Assad.
      It is silent as it is significant. Give mattresses a finger to bite off a hand.
  10. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 21 January 2016 14: 14
    +2
    dissolve the UN. Or let only humanitarian help deal with it.
  11. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 21 January 2016 14: 14
    +5
    Now we need to look at the reaction of our diplomats. If it wakes up soft, then everything is divided.
  12. sa-ag
    sa-ag 21 January 2016 14: 16
    +4
    During the war, the country's sovereignty extends to the territory controlled by the country, there is no sovereignty in the uncontrolled part and it is necessary to ask not from Amers, but from Assad, as he allowed it
  13. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 21 January 2016 14: 18
    +2
    With pleasure I would have watched the raid on this base of several pieces of "Crocodiles" of the Syrian Air Force with packs of NURSs. Well, and landing to the heap. What a pity it won't be ... crying
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. aborigine
      aborigine 21 January 2016 14: 27
      0
      Why then write nonsense ????
  14. propolsky
    propolsky 21 January 2016 14: 28
    0
    It is time to check the technical condition and effectiveness of the combat use of Russian concrete-piercing aircraft bombs, and restore the skills of the flight crew.
  15. TVM - 75
    TVM - 75 21 January 2016 14: 29
    +1
    Syria’s reaction is interesting. Or is Assad intimidated and silently swallow, or say his fairy? These brazen mattress guys respect only brute force.
  16. YGV-97219
    YGV-97219 21 January 2016 14: 29
    0
    Arrogant Saxons justify their nickname!
  17. yuriy55
    yuriy55 21 January 2016 14: 32
    0
    It remains to hear the opinion about this "action" of the official parties involved in eliminating the terrorist threat in Syria, namely the leadership of Syria and the command of the Aerospace Forces. Then, if necessary, erase the works of the "striped boys" into dust ... am
  18. Flinky
    Flinky 21 January 2016 14: 40
    +1
    Let restore, this Assad airfield is still useful :)
  19. Taygerus
    Taygerus 21 January 2016 14: 41
    0
    I have a feeling that we are the only ones to play by the rules.
    1. 31rus
      31rus 21 January 2016 15: 05
      +1
      Dear, what are the rules in the war? There aren’t and will not be, the rules are unfortunately not beneficial
  20. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 21 January 2016 14: 59
    0
    Quote: aboriginal
    Why then write nonsense ????

    Why cut wings, do not destroy the dream!
    It is a pity that Assad did not "guessed" to make friends with the Kurds on time, he would have to rake these "Augean stables" with the help of the Russian Aerospace Forces recourse .
  21. 31rus
    31rus 21 January 2016 15: 03
    0
    Dear, I think this is not news for our ranks, so if it’s true that the partition of Syria cannot be avoided, this is how big politics is done, Baidan’s visit to Moscow again is not a defeat for the United States, as many cheers patriots presented here, this is another stage of our confrontations, I hope in the higher echelons they know what they are doing, although doubts arise
  22. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 21 January 2016 15: 42
    +3
    The question is who will come closer to Raqqa: the Syrian army from the west,
    or the Syrian opposition from the southeast.
    The Syrian army stalled in front of Palmyra, and the opposition
    few armed units in that area. So far, only the Kurds
    approached Racca from the north. But they won’t storm the city,
    only block, because the local Arab population does not like them.
  23. Tusv
    Tusv 21 January 2016 15: 49
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The question is who will come closer to Raqqa: the Syrian army from the west,
    or Syrian opposition from the southeast

    According to last year's reports by the American information bureau, the Syrian opposition surrounded Daish troops in the Raqqah region and is about to take it.
    Lied to the Yankees
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 21 January 2016 17: 30
    0
    Quote: Lesovik
    Now they will make a base there, figs then you will expel them from Syria ...

    Surely for this, Fashington promised the Kurds autonomy so desired for them! Therefore, the planned negotiations to resolve the Syrian problem, if they take place, can turn into negotiations on federalization, and even, in general, on the division of Syria!
  26. GDV
    GDV 21 January 2016 19: 58
    0
    So maybe a jhahn, like they didn't know?
  27. Crown
    Crown 21 January 2016 20: 18
    0
    There is only one way out, in order to prevent the amers from entering without a flight zone throughout Syria, otherwise you won’t be able to pick them up from there.
  28. 4ekist
    4ekist 21 January 2016 22: 52
    0
    Let them prepare for various "surprises".
  29. PunisheR
    PunisheR 22 January 2016 14: 18
    0
    TV channel correspondent Murad Gazdiev reports that Washington did not ask Damascus to use this airfield, and is working outside the framework of international standards and basic respect for the sovereignty of Syria.


    Does an exceptional nation really need to respect Aboriginal people? belay