"R" R ° R · RїСЂРѕРј "РІС‹ стР° РІРёР »" РќР ° С „тогР° Р · Сѓ" РёСЃРє РЅР ° СЃСѓРјРјСѓ Р ± РѕР »РµРµ 2,5 РјР» СЂРґ. РґРѕР »Р» Р ° СЂРѕРІ

43
Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller told the media that in relation to the Ukrainian NAK Naftogaz, an invoice of almost $ 2,55 billion was billed to pay for the gas supplied. According to Miller, Naftogaz should pay off the debt within ten days. RIA News cites the text of Gazprom’s message:

In accordance with the gas purchase and sale contract in force between Gazprom and Naftogaz of Ukraine (the contract was concluded in 2009), the buyer is obliged to pay the minimum annual amount of gas annually. Based on the terms of the contract, the minimum annual amount of gas in the 3 quarter of the 2015 of the year was 10,485 billion cubic meters. Given this, as well as the volume of gas supplied by Gazprom to Ukraine in the third quarter of 2015, Naftogaz was billed for 2,549 billion dollars.


"R" R ° R · RїСЂРѕРј "РІС‹ стР° РІРёР »" РќР ° С „тогР° Р · Сѓ" РёСЃРє РЅР ° СЃСѓРјРјСѓ Р ± РѕР »РµРµ 2,5 РјР» СЂРґ. РґРѕР »Р» Р ° СЂРѕРІ


Recall that Ukraine refused to purchase Russian gas, although no new contract in lieu of the 2009 contract of the year was signed between Ukraine and Russia.

Alexey Miller reports that the rule “take (talking about the minimum prescribed in the contact, the volume of gas) or pay” in the third quarter of 2015, was not canceled by anyone and continued to operate during this quarter. In the first and second quarters of 2015, the rule was abolished after negotiations between company representatives. After the end of the second quarter, the extension of the period of inactivity of the “take or pay” rule was not discussed, which gives Gazprom an opportunity to file a lawsuit against NJSC “Naftogaz of Ukraine”.

A separate question: will NAK Naftogaz of Ukraine, which has declared its readiness to increase the price of transit for Russian gas to Europe three times, pay? Or will the conditions for payment of debt by Ukraine still be created by Gazprom? ..
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    19 January 2016 12: 42
    Well, finally they began to really remind Ukraine that the treaty must be implemented. They are used to the fact that contracts are not binding. And I hope that this is the first swallow. Here they pay the debt and the penalty for gas, then let them think about raising the price of transit winkAnd all this cardibalet will be until we exclude them from transit
    1. +11
      19 January 2016 12: 43

      This is in response to the increase in tariffs for pumping gas to Europe


      1. +6
        19 January 2016 12: 51
        We need to recall all their deficiencies and surcharges, which were forgiven by simple default without documenting.
        1. +3
          19 January 2016 13: 00
          There are no words (quote from Lavrov), it turns out that we owe them .....

          "Russian debt to Ukraine is about $ 25 billion - expert
          The Russian Federation owes Ukraine about $ 25 billion. This was announced on the air of Channel 5 by ex-deputy head of the NBU, rector of the International Institute of Business Alexander Savchenko, reports UNN. “Russia owes us a very large amount of money. According to my calculations and not only mine - about $ 25 billion.
          And we owe her three billion. And why does the Ukrainian government want to return this money as soon as possible - the debt of Yanukovych, which was withdrawn by the structures and by Yanukovych himself to the same Russian Federation. I still have hope that we will win these courts and begin to seize Russian assets, including the assets of Russian state banks, "he said.
      2. +5
        19 January 2016 12: 59
        I think Gazprom has enough leverage to knock money out of any debtor. Because behind it is one of the most powerful countries in the world.
        Moreover, there is a contract that is molded by lawyers not made from the finger. Yatsenyuk and K can say anything and scream at least in the toilet that they will not pay, but there is official paper notarized and stamped. Do not pay? Good. But then there will be a court and money we’ll knock out one of you.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          19 January 2016 21: 57
          First you need to make the Kiev junta solvent. As they say, not in this life. Winning a court is half the battle; it is sometimes impossible to execute a decision. The Ukraine that we knew is no longer there.
      3. +7
        19 January 2016 13: 13
        from 2014 bald cocks had to be dragged through the courts FOR ANY FULFILLMENT OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS !!! you can communicate only with rudeness with these currency grants, there are no other ways ...
        1. 0
          19 January 2016 20: 06
          Quote: sasha 19871987
          you can communicate only with rudeness with these currency grants, there are no other ways ...


          Rogue beggars. The only light in the window - "stars and stripes" spit for military needs as many as 46 million green candy wrappers. The question is: how quickly will they dissolve in the bottomless pockets of Poroshenko and his comrades?
          (cry.)
      4. +5
        19 January 2016 13: 16
        ... and then we all forgive them. And where is the prepayment actually?
      5. avt
        +3
        19 January 2016 15: 14
        Quote: bulvas
        This is in response to the increase in tariffs for pumping gas to Europe

        Here are some of these higher rates ?? Do you have specific information? Well, what is nonsense to repeat! I have already written on this topic - some kind of fucking naftogaz blurted out - "We have raised the USE - a peremog!" His journalists immediately asked - "Has Gazprom already notified about the change in the contract?" Like what? The old contract was torn like a heating pad? He answered simply - “No.” Well, who, where and what tariffs have changed ???
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +20
      19 January 2016 12: 48
      Quote: tobacco
      Well, finally they began to really remind Ukraine that the treaty must be implemented. They are used to the fact that contracts are not binding. And I hope this is the first swallow

      They reminded me that dill out of 3 lard of debt are not going to be paid, and then another 2 and a half lard. Collectors must be sent.
      1. 0
        19 January 2016 13: 23
        Collectors must be sent.
        They are just waiting for the go-ahead, well, and behind them, and psychiatrists will catch up ....
    4. +6
      19 January 2016 12: 52
      Quote: tobacco
      Well, finally they began to really remind Ukraine that the treaty must be implemented. They are used to the fact that contracts are not binding. And I hope that this is the first swallow. Here they pay the debt and the penalty for gas, then let them think about raising the price of transit wink

      Hmm, but what does Yatsenyuk cost and give themselves permission to not pay the bills, as was the case with the same 3 billion state debt? Hehe, in any case, continue to deliver. There are plenty of examples in recent years. And they stole from us and got into debt. And we give them another discount.
      1. +1
        19 January 2016 13: 01
        Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller told the media that in relation to the Ukrainian NAK Naftogaz, an invoice of almost $ 2,55 billion was billed to pay for the gas supplied. According to Miller, Naftogaz should pay off the debt within ten days.

        Well, that has increased the price for transit, gentlemen, Ukrainians! As the saying goes: "With your own bacon, for yourself according to the tinsel!" smile
    5. +1
      19 January 2016 13: 47
      It’s time to shut off the blue fuel to Kiev. How much can you frankly steal? They have gas storages and so on to the eyeballs. So let them use it.
    6. 0
      19 January 2016 18: 27
      Put up and what's the point? They will have to knock out money in European courts, and the position there is clearly not on the side of Gazprom. Something is inaudible as the courts go on similar claims for previous periods.
  2. +3
    19 January 2016 12: 43
    Let the one who dances her pays for the girl. smile But something tells me that girls who do not have an elementary mind dance just like that, and in a hard way. sad
  3. +3
    19 January 2016 12: 44
    And what is it ......... can they pay with something ???? And where is 3 billion debt. What was paid? Yes, even in court you can’t take anything from them. Yes, invoice as much as you like - with d.b.i.l.o.v. bribes are smooth.
  4. +8
    19 January 2016 12: 45
    Naftogaz must pay off the debt within ten days.
    And if they do not pay off, turn off the gas?! I, I beg you ... wink
    1. +5
      19 January 2016 12: 53
      Rather, we will discuss the next discount in the price for it;)
    2. +6
      19 January 2016 12: 56
      Why beg here. Disable strictly according to the rules. With cattle and bankrupt the only way to do it! And there is nothing to play humanism. Vaughn in Genichensk gave gas to compensate for the stolen dill in their own.
      What is that?
      So that you can steal calmly further?
      And how to always pay Russia?
      When will this Leopoldovism end (Guys, let's live together!)
      With thieves only by the rules!
      The contract says take or pay!
      So either take and pay, or pay !!!
    3. +3
      19 January 2016 13: 03
      Quote: BRUTAL
      And if they don’t pay off, turn off the gas ?!

      No, dodgers will take away gas going to Europe, or give oak for European values.
  5. Dam
    +5
    19 January 2016 12: 46
    Bullshit, there is no money, a lot of Mr. Awna is ahead. After all, there is no one to negotiate with anyway. It is necessary to tie with this transit. Or take control 404, perhaps together with Europe
  6. +2
    19 January 2016 12: 47
    Yes, the rabbit with a notch is already up to the bulb.
  7. -1
    19 January 2016 12: 47
    Yes, disconnect. It’s easy.
  8. +5
    19 January 2016 12: 48
    Why do they need gas? USA will send tires. smile
  9. +4
    19 January 2016 12: 48
    As far as I remember, they were going to supply gas to them on an advance payment. Or are these old debts? Or is it an old rake?
    1. +1
      19 January 2016 12: 52
      this is the basis of the contract that is still valid
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      19 January 2016 13: 33
      Quote: lysyj bob
      As far as I remember, they were going to supply gas to them on an advance payment. Or are these old debts? Or is it an old rake?

      This is a take-or-pay account. they did not take gas, now (under the contract) they are obliged to pay ...
      And rightly so.
      Contracts must be respected, otherwise why conclude them.
      And with those who do not comply with the contract, it is necessary to act as it should, that is, judge and fine, or even send collectors (select Novorossia for the arrears ...)
      1. +2
        19 January 2016 13: 49
        Thank you for the clarification.
        (to take into account the arrears Novorossia ...)
        When the orange epic began with gas theft on an industrial scale, I was very sure that our Crimea would be squeezed out for these debts. Crimea was squeezed out not at the expense of debts. Maybe Novorossia would be squeezed the same way ...
  10. +6
    19 January 2016 12: 53
    It's a pity. but Gazprom will not get anything until it reaches the board of directors - to change lawyers. And to sign agreements not at the expense of the country. Somehow I don’t worry about the company, they’ll rip off theirs from the Russians, but how can a cleaning lady clean toilets without a purse for 2,5 million rubles?
  11. 0
    19 January 2016 12: 53
    Soon in Hohland, instead of Naftogaz, there will be another 1 branch of Gazprom and the business will be taken away for debts
  12. +3
    19 January 2016 13: 05
    It's time to demand your own. And then we’ll forgive and forget all the brothers. And then we’re used to living in a non-fallow home for nothing and handouts. Yes, we blame Russia for everything that they can’t do.
  13. +2
    19 January 2016 13: 06
    We will demand everything that they owe us under the contract! But in another way or how!
  14. +2
    19 January 2016 13: 09
    Will Naftogaz Ukrainy, which declared its readiness to triple the price of transit of Russian gas to Europe, pay?

    Here it’s not worth guessing. Of course it won't. Less needed to flirt with them in due time.
  15. +2
    19 January 2016 13: 10
    I think right. Enough to liberalize with them already. There is a valid contract, be so kind as to fulfill it. Although it is not European to execute contracts. The fact that we will not receive a ruble from Naftogaz is clear, like God's day. But bills must be presented ...
  16. +2
    19 January 2016 13: 22
    An interesting question is about a gas transit contract. It seems that the cost of gas is tied to the price of gas itself. So if the price has fallen (the price of gas is tied to the price of oil) then raising the transit fee as a minimum contradicts the terms of the contract, which is the legal basis for the lawsuit against Naftogaz. the stump that the money from these lawsuits and indeed from this territory to get the biggest problem. Slightly off topic. ... at RBC there was an infa that the mattress mattresses fell to 10 cents. To drive and fill up a full tank gee geelaughing
  17. +3
    19 January 2016 13: 52
    A lawsuit is a good thing. But does someone think Kiev will pay? Are there such perverts? To get paid you need to grab Piglet for Yaytsenyuk! And the trunk to each head. Otherwise, 10 years of tyagomotin. And the coolest thing is that Russia will again give gas to Ukraine! Why? Patamush !!!
  18. 0
    19 January 2016 14: 09
    Gazprom, having taken upon itself the expense of transporting gas through Ukraine, probably did not take into account their cunning. Now Europe must either pay for exports taking into account measurements of transit tariffs,
    or put Ukrov in place. They seem to have no other way, and we have the same.
  19. msm
    msm
    0
    19 January 2016 14: 15
    Miller can ask, so who will give him!
  20. bad
    +2
    19 January 2016 14: 38
    And at this time in mattress
    In the building of the US Senate, unidentified people distributed leaflets with photographs of Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the scandalous prosecutor Viktor Shokin and former People's Deputy Nikolai Martynenko. In the proclamations, all the above-mentioned characters of the Ukrainian political fauna are accused of corruption and theft on an especially large scale. According to the good old American tradition, a reward has been appointed for the heads of the wanted persons - no less than five million dollars per forelock.

    It is still unknown who is behind this action, but many senators completely agree that the criminal activities of these particular politicians threaten the security of not only Ukraine, but also the United States of America. Congress has even announced a debate on this subject in the near future and is collecting signatures to appeal to the president.
    laughing Yatsenyuk wanted in the United States on charges of corruption
    http://politobzor.net/show-78264-yacenyuka-razyskivayut-v-ssha-po-obvineniyu-v-k
    orrupcii.html
  21. +4
    19 January 2016 14: 40
    Quote: seti
    I think Gazprom has enough leverage to knock money out of any debtor. Because behind it is one of the most powerful countries in the world.

    In my opinion, "Gazprom" missed the next FICO from Kiev! They don't give a damn about all the debts, they have already forgiven everything! The guys from Kiev will not pay, even the STATE DEBT is not paid, and the default does not matter! And Gazprom itself is playing giveaway - eternal discounts, offsets. And for an increase in transit fees, agree, remember! Russia has no leverage for this gang. The only way out is to completely break off economic relations, it's a pity that there are not enough bypass pipes yet! hi
  22. 0
    19 January 2016 15: 00
    Not a lawsuit, but an invoice. The difference is huge.
    1. 0
      19 January 2016 15: 31
      And for a long time headliners don't care how to arrange, the main thing is to "catch". It is necessary to issue a payroll instead of a salary once and okay, what's the difference? gee ..)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. +2
    19 January 2016 16: 41
    Senya will not give money ....