BTA pilots began to learn IL-76MD-90A

71
In January, the first operation of the first military transport began aviation heavy aircraft IL-76MD-90A, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the company "IL".



“Pilots of the Ivanovo Aviation Center Aviation Center started the development of a new heavy military transport aircraft. BTA Commander Vladimir Benediktov and Head of Ivanovo Aviation Center Igor Matveyev took part in the first flights, ”the release said.

“The new heavy military transport aircraft Il-76MD-90А" Viktor Livanov "entered service with the Ivanovo aviation center in December 2015, which was an important event for the military transport aviation of the country. The BTA has high hopes for the new aircraft, because it surpasses its predecessors in reliability, range, economy and payload, ”the press service noted.

“The IL-76MD-90А has installed a new flight-navigation system, an automatic control system, a communication complex, a glass cockpit that meet all modern requirements for aircraft avionics and significantly increase flight safety, accuracy of air navigation and airborne landing,” message.

It is noted that "the replacement of standard D-30KP-2 engines with modern PS-90А-76, installation of a modified wing and a reinforced chassis greatly expand the operational capabilities of the aircraft."

The aircraft, created on the basis of the serial IL-76MD, "has all the advantages of its predecessor, while it can carry more cargo to a greater distance, with greater fuel economy."

The aircraft, "was named after Viktor Livanov, General Director - General Designer of OAO IL in the period from 2006 to 2014, General Designer of aviation complexes of transport aviation of the Russian Federation in the period from 2012 to 2014, laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation in the field of science and technicians, doctors of economic sciences ", explained in the press service.
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    18 January 2016 18: 24
    It is noted that "the replacement of standard D-30KP-2 engines with modern PS-90А-76, installation of a modified wing and a reinforced chassis greatly expand the operational capabilities of the aircraft."

    And were composite materials used? In order to reduce the mass of the aircraft, if so, what percentage?
    1. +13
      18 January 2016 18: 25
      What a beautiful plane!

      1. +25
        18 January 2016 18: 32
        Quote: bulvas
        What a beautiful plane!

        Explicitly taken from nature:
      2. +2
        18 January 2016 18: 50
        Quote: bulvas
        What a beautiful plane!


        For concrete and snow and ice stripes, there is no arguing. We would also have screw machines for soil. But generally impressive, especially the engines. I remember that from China, the 76th with a sub-band of tons on board came to us with documents for 30. Well this is how much this one will actually raise, and not according to the passport?
        1. gjv
          +1
          18 January 2016 19: 21
          Quote: iliitch
          Well this is how much this one will actually raise, and not according to the passport?

          It is imagined that 75 tons will be able to raise as much as possible.
          1. +2
            18 January 2016 19: 43
            Quote: gjv
            It is imagined that 75 tons will be able to raise as much as possible.

            Maybe it can, but at what distance, that’s the question?
            1. gjv
              0
              18 January 2016 19: 48
              Quote: Tol100v
              Maybe it can, but at what distance, that’s the question?

              It is believed that with 75 tons it will turn out up to 3000 km.
        2. gjv
          +11
          18 January 2016 19: 27
          Quote: iliitch
          For concrete and snow and ice stripes, there is no arguing. We would also for the ground

          Actually, it’s also for the ground ...
          1. +2
            19 January 2016 08: 44
            Quote: gjv
            Actually, it’s also for the ground ...


            Its load is very limited there - when they put it on the ground.

            Quote: gjv
            It is imagined that 75 tons will be able to raise as much as possible.


            Passport gives 52. In the future may 60
            1. gjv
              +2
              19 January 2016 17: 13
              Quote: Falcon
              Passport gives 52. In the future may 60

              This is yes, the passport ... The maximum load, "non-passport", was discussed. Approx. Max. takeoff weight minus empty weight minus fuel weight = about 75 tons.
        3. +3
          18 January 2016 19: 43
          during the Paris-Beijing rally, not so long ago, the chief of the races admired the possibilities of the IL-76, carrying mobile TV centers, to land and take off with a goose in the middle of the desert.
      3. +2
        18 January 2016 19: 39
        Quote: bulvas
        What a beautiful plane!

        It seems like an aircraft of the project of the end of 70's, but our engineers breathed new life into new materials, engines and ideas. So such a machine will fly for a long time. In fact, this is a new aircraft.
        1. 0
          18 January 2016 20: 58
          You can fly a lot - the price of oil has fallen to zero, but whether it will fly for a long time now depends on the economy.
      4. +2
        18 January 2016 20: 58
        Quote: bulvas
        What a beautiful plane!

        Bird! soldier Already in Ivanovo
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      18 January 2016 18: 27
      If not a secret, for what purpose are you interested?
      hi
      1. +2
        18 January 2016 18: 30
        Quote: Cheshire
        If not a secret, for what purpose are you interested?

        In order to compare with Western counterparts, how much we lag behind ... if we lag behind.
        1. 0
          19 January 2016 01: 43
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In order to compare with Western counterparts, how much we lag behind ... if we lag behind.

          ----------------------
          Such a beautiful and powerful machine will be in demand for a long time, and the reserve for modernization has not yet been exhausted. Now the battle is on the engines - noise, power, efficiency. The planer is also partially modernized.
        2. 0
          19 January 2016 08: 56
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In order to compare with Western counterparts, how much we lag behind ... if we lag behind.


          Are there any direct analogues?
          Military trucks - similar in capacity, are the C-17 and A-400. But one takes more cargo, and the second less. 100% of analogues cannot be found.

          And to compare with civilian trucks is completely pointless. They are better in all respects, and easier and more economical.
    4. gjv
      +14
      18 January 2016 18: 33
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      In order to reduce the mass of the aircraft, if so, what percentage?

      The aircraft design is identical to that of the Il-76. The aircraft airframe (fuselage, wings, plumage) is manufactured at the Aviastar aircraft plant (Ulyanovsk), the chassis is manufactured by Aviaagregat (Samara), the mechanization of the production of the Tashkent aircraft plant (according to unconfirmed reports, there is no condition), the plumage is so the same production of the Tashkent aircraft plant, pylons - VASO. Beginning with the first pre-production aircraft, mechanization and pylons (pylons - starting with the 01-06 aircraft) will be manufactured at the Aviastar aircraft plant.
      The wing has been redesigned using lengthy caisson panels. Earlier, on IL-76 at an aircraft factory in Tashkent, wing panels were made of 3 parts in length and 4 parts in width. For IL-476 wing panels are made whole 25 meters in length and 3-4 segments in width. The design of the wing panels has also changed significantly - earlier stringers were processed along with the panel (from the slab), but now they will be manufactured separately and riveted with panels. The theoretical contour of the wing did not change. The panels are made long and as a result, the weight is reduced by 2,7 tons. hi
      1. +2
        18 January 2016 19: 24
        Great !!! good drinks
      2. +1
        18 January 2016 22: 58
        Quote: gjv
        previously stringers were processed along with the panel


        And what previously could not be done by stringers separately? After all, machining is expensive, long and a lot of metal goes into shavings. For some reason I thought, they do so, a set with ribs, spars, stringers, then sheathing from sheets.
  2. +9
    18 January 2016 18: 24
    Thank God that we are mastering our own, family, and not Boeing or Airbus.
    1. +6
      18 January 2016 18: 38
      Well, Boeing and Airbus still have to get rid of .. in civil aviation
      Quote: individ
      Thank God that we are mastering our own, family, and not Boeing or Airbus.
      1. gjv
        +1
        18 January 2016 18: 56
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Well, Boeing and Airbus still have to get rid of .. in civil aviation

        In addition to aircraft production, Aviastar plans to organize production of converting Airbus A320 / 321 passenger aircraft into cargo aircraft. It is expected that this will be done by the specially created joint venture Airbus Freighter Conversion GmbH (AFC) (25% of it belongs to the United Aircraft Corporation and Irkut, 32% to the European aerospace concern EADS, 18% to Airbus).
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +8
    18 January 2016 18: 27
    How much did he transport me to the hot 80. Great plane. Honor and glory to the designers.
  5. +3
    18 January 2016 18: 30
    Thing! Handsome man! Clear sky!
  6. +5
    18 January 2016 18: 31
    I am both happy and not happy, I am glad that we can ... I am not happy that such "trucks" were needed in BTA yesterday. And I am glad that our engine is Perm !!!
  7. +3
    18 January 2016 18: 34
    not clear only
    .... "glass" cabin, ...

    sort of externally identical to the usual 76th and even 76MD ....

    It’s clear that the modern electronics were stuffed there. Mama don’t worry, and the engines were replaced ...

    and the glider looks one-on-one.
    1. gjv
      +11
      18 January 2016 18: 46
      Quote: OlegV
      not clear only .... "glass" cockpit, ...

      Quote: OlegV
      stuffed mom don't cry



      1. +2
        19 January 2016 07: 31
        Quote: gjv
        not clear only .... "glass" cockpit, ...


        Here is a photo of the navigator’s cabin, though the modification of the aircraft is ordinary.
        1. gjv
          +3
          19 January 2016 08: 25
          Quote: Ros 56
          Here is a photo of the navigator’s cabin, though the modification of the aircraft is ordinary.

          Now, on the IL-76MD-90A, so.

          The required minimum of "analog" electromechanical devices, a minimum of switches, a navigation station and two displays.
  8. +15
    18 January 2016 18: 34
    You are amazed at the genius of the Ilyushin Design Bureau engineers. The aircraft was put into production in 1971 (45 years !!). This is the constructive and technological groundwork! More than 30 modifications and this is not the limit! And no one even thinks that an airplane of the "morally" type is outdated.
    1. cap
      +2
      18 January 2016 18: 47
      Quote: Proxima
      You are amazed at the genius of the Ilyushin Design Bureau engineers. The aircraft was put into production in 1971 (45 years !!). This is the constructive and technological groundwork! More than 30 modifications and this is not the limit! And no one even thinks that an airplane of the "morally" type is outdated.


      Classic doesn’t age!
      Marasmus is getting younger, like: "Boeing is vaaasche ...!" am
      Let them eat now.
      The plane is handsome !!!
      1. Dam
        +3
        18 January 2016 19: 02
        Aircraft manufacturing for Russia is one of the pillars of sovereignty. It should always be kept in mind that sanctions can be imposed on Boeing and Airbass instantly. So, let's go on foot?
    2. 0
      18 January 2016 19: 14
      In principle, there is only one complaint to IL-76 - a tank cannot enter it. And the rest - the car even
      1. gjv
        +3
        18 January 2016 19: 38
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        In principle, there is only one complaint to IL-76 - a tank cannot enter it

        But interestingly, the T-72 is no longer a tank? Filmed side screens with the T-72 and flew ...
        1. 0
          18 January 2016 19: 51
          Quote: gjv
          But interestingly, the T-72 is no longer a tank?

          I suppose you yourself know the answer to your question. The T-55 is also a tank, of course, but ... But with the T-90 such a number will no longer pass.
          1. -1
            19 January 2016 16: 05
            Dear Andrey, you have no equal in naval issues, well, if you do not take into account the "main apponent", but in the photo there is a tank with a 2 A 46 cannon, I'm sure T-72!
          2. 0
            22 January 2016 00: 18
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            I suppose you yourself know the answer to your question. The T-55 is also a tank, of course, but ... But with the T-90 such a number will no longer pass.

            As far as I know, one of the requirements for the design of tanks was the width that allowed transportation on railway platforms. Is the T-90 wider than the T-72, if no one has canceled these requirements? It seems that the width of both with side screens is the same - 3780 and 3775.
    3. +5
      18 January 2016 19: 32
      So, this is applicable to all modern ones.

      C-130 in general in the 56 armed with set, and build today!

      And also at the end of the 90's they made a global bulkhead, releasing SuperHercules, building almost 400 planes in 17 years!
      1. 0
        18 January 2016 21: 12
        As part of the Russian Aerospace Forces, An-2 (1949) aircraft with a Wright-Cyclo engine (1936).
        1. 0
          18 January 2016 23: 03
          Quote: iouris
          An-2 aircraft (1949) with a Wright-Cyclo engine (1936).

          C'mon, the ASH-62 is there.
          1. 0
            18 January 2016 23: 34
            ASH-62 is a translation.
  9. +4
    18 January 2016 18: 36
    Bigger and bigger, better and better. Spin the MIC. Restore it faster.
    1. gjv
      +2
      18 January 2016 18: 50
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      More and more

      On October 4, 2012, the Russian Ministry of Defense and JSC UAC-Transport Aircraft signed contract No. З / 4/2 / 1-13-DOGOZ for the supply of 2018 aircraft by 39 for the amount of 140 billion rubles. As it turned out later (September 2013) - the contract provides for delivery until 2020 inclusive.
  10. +3
    18 January 2016 18: 37
    Russia needs a heavyweight to replace the Bandera Academy of Sciences.
    1. gjv
      +2
      18 January 2016 18: 57
      Quote: Nymp
      Russia needs a heavyweight to replace the Bandera Academy of Sciences.

      To date, specialists of Aviastar-SP CJSC (December 2014) have modernized 9 aircraft of the Russian Air Force An-124 to An-124-100.
      1. +1
        18 January 2016 20: 04
        Quote: gjv
        Specialists of Aviastar-SP CJSC

        Thanks to Ulyanovsk and the order "308"!
    2. +1
      18 January 2016 20: 03
      Quote: Nymp
      Russia needs a heavyweight to replace the Bandera Academy of Sciences.

      Ruslan (AN-124), not Bandera, but Soviet! And it was made in the USSR! Yes, development is only de jure in Kiev, and testing and production in the RSFSR! So it doesn't smell like Banderism here. But the fact that only horns and legs were left from the Antonova firm for the general joy of the EU and the UGA is very SORRY.
      1. 0
        19 January 2016 07: 16
        Quote: Tol100v
        only "horns and legs", very regrettable.


        It is regrettable that our poor managers except their pockets do not see anything. After all, it was possible to pull this design bureau to us, I certainly understand what it is. One move is equal to two fires. And yet. Anyone who made such cars, we would be useful.
  11. +1
    18 January 2016 18: 39
    This is the first transport built in the Russian Federation. Interestingly, are foreign components used on it?
  12. +6
    18 January 2016 18: 40
    Quote: staryivoin
    ..... I am not happy that such "trucks" were needed in BTA yesterday .....

    well, they’re not exactly like that, but the usual 76th and MDs were enough, ..... you would have seen how many of them were then cut into scrap, because in the 90s there was a supply .... yes there wasn’t s / h searched (removed) from other airliners, in order to ensure that other ships perform tasks.
    As a result, it turned out .... uh .... I don’t even want to remember.
  13. +3
    18 January 2016 18: 40
    Pleases. More of these. Anyway useful.
  14. +2
    18 January 2016 18: 41
    It is now visible in its class with the main transport;
  15. +2
    18 January 2016 18: 47
    ULYANOVSK, December 30. / Corr. TASS Natalia Khoroshikh. A regiment of the Military Transport Aviation (BTA) of Russia from the Il-76MD-90A aircraft is planned to be founded in 2017 in Ulyanovsk. This was announced on Wednesday by the chief engineer of the Military Transport Aviation Alexander Glukhikh. “In 2017, the base of the regiment will be planned here, on Ulyanovsk land, on new types of aircraft Il-76MD-90A. Now there is a laying of new planes - all of them will go to this regiment, ”he said. Glukhikh noted that the Military Transport Aviation is interested in the fact that work on the formation of this regiment has already been launched. He also added that the first Il-76MD-90A "Victor Livanov", adopted by the BTA on December 2, is being successfully operated. “The military transport aviation has a need for airplanes, we have been waiting for them for a long time. Now we are taking the second ship, ”he added. The latest modification of the Il-76 military transport is distinguished by new equipment - a “glass cabin”, modern engines, a modified wing and a reinforced chassis are installed here. In total, Aviastar-SP, under a contract with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation worth 140 billion rubles, concluded in 2012, will produce 39 aircraft of this type.

    More on TASS:

    http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/2566723
  16. +5
    18 January 2016 18: 58
    "The aircraft, created on the basis of the serial Il-76MD," has all the advantages of its predecessor, while it can carry more cargo over a longer distance, with greater fuel economy. "
    Good news. But they forgot how to write in Russian. Stylistics of literal translation from foreign languages, instead of "great and mighty". In Russian it will be - not "with greater fuel economy" but "with lower fuel consumption"! In the performance characteristics of the aircraft there is no "fuel economy" but there is "fuel consumption (consumption)"!
    1. +2
      18 January 2016 20: 09
      Quote: Homo
      In the performance characteristics of the aircraft there is no "fuel economy" but there is "fuel consumption (consumption)"!

      That is precisely why we have a "switch", not a "switch"!
      1. 0
        18 January 2016 21: 04
        Fuel consumption for a given range is determined by the specific fuel consumption - this is a characteristic of the engine.
        The Il-76 is a "kerosene fighter", so an aircraft of the An-70 type would come in handy (on a Soviet scale). On the scale of the RF Armed Forces, it may be inexpedient to contain these two types. I had to choose.
  17. +1
    18 January 2016 19: 14
    http://cont.ws/post/183007 вот тут с картинками
  18. +1
    18 January 2016 19: 28
    Sometimes Russian "Gorynychi snakes" rise in our sky, so that they can quietly nest on the ground
    http://www.photoforum.ru/f/photo/000/743/743500_11.jpg
    1. +1
      18 January 2016 20: 16
      Quote: morprepud
      Sometimes Russian "Gorynychi snakes" rise in our sky, so that they can quietly nest on the ground

      The opposite is true! That is why "White Swans" (Tu-160) are taking off from Us, so that snakes and other creatures do not nest in the World, with ears AND MONEY from the State Department!
      1. +1
        18 January 2016 20: 39
        Well, I’m talking about love for my Motherland of Russia - for beauty and its nobility, and you? ...
        Well, all right, anyway - on holidays you are an Orthodox Christmas Eve.
        Likely, many of us will dive into the water too - I hope they won’t listen to the deep ........
  19. 0
    18 January 2016 19: 40
    .... And were composite materials used? In order to reduce the mass of the aircraft, if so, what percentage? .... This is a military aircraft. What is the weight balance of the rudders? Socks are clogged with lead ballast. And you are reducing weight .... It’s very difficult (deadlines are constantly breaking) implementation and construction. As long as only a piece of pro-in. I want to believe in the best !!!
    1. gjv
      0
      18 January 2016 19: 46
      Quote: ra4lhw
      So far, only a piece of pro-in. I want to believe in the best !!!

      The tanker Il-78M-90A is being built. No. 0201. They promise to roll out this year.
      1. +1
        18 January 2016 21: 05
        What for? It seems to be preparing a tanker based on the IL-96.
        1. gjv
          0
          19 January 2016 08: 33
          Quote: iouris
          What for? It seems to be preparing a tanker based on the IL-96.

          A tanker based on IL-96 will be for the long-range aviation strategists Tu-160 and Tu-95. For the rest - IL-78.
    2. gjv
      +1
      18 January 2016 19: 57
      Quote: ra4lhw
      .... And were composite materials used? In order to reduce the mass of the aircraft, if so, what percentage? .... This is a military aircraft. What is the weight balancing of the rudders - socks are clogged with lead ballast. And you are reducing weight ....

      In general, you are right, composite materials for an average transport aircraft are not as relevant as, say, for a fighter. However, balancing the rudders and reducing the weight is not the same with the same. The steering wheels are balanced, and the mass is different. It is rather a matter of centering. Remember the story with the pieces of iron behind the cockpit of the An-178.
  20. 0
    18 January 2016 19: 50
    What surprises me is, why not immediately make the IL-76MF modernized technologically and constructively? In my opinion, the Ilyushin residents leave a reserve for the 22nd century !!!
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 21: 07
      Nothing is eternal under the Moon.
  21. 0
    18 January 2016 20: 04
    It would be nice after 39 another series of these aircraft pieces so 100-150.
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 21: 09
      First you need to find a major buyer in the foreign market.
  22. +2
    18 January 2016 20: 49
    Production of IL-76 and Tu-204 aircraft at the Aviastar-SP plant http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/72958/
    Pictured is the first Il-78M-90A tanker
  23. +1
    18 January 2016 20: 54
    We have a lot of good, beautiful and reliable aircraft, but there are some special and warm feelings for this ..!
    Thank you for extending his life.
  24. 0
    18 January 2016 21: 05
    ..... However, steering wheel balancing and weight reduction are not the same with the same. The steering wheels are balanced and the weight is different. It's more of a centering issue. Remember the story with the pieces of iron behind the cockpit of the An-178 ... The weight balancing of the rudders on this type of aircraft with its "modern" control system has nothing to do with centering.
  25. 0
    19 January 2016 01: 20
    And now the crews of the new Il-76MD-90A are being taught to practice the "Afghan approach"?
    Or is it already gone?

  26. 0
    19 January 2016 06: 30
    Yeah, with our open spaces without such a technique, we can’t do anything.
    In five years, armies will be transferred
    from one end of the country to the other by such beauties.