Japanese Prime Minister: “I want to settle the territorial problem hard” with Russia

133
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced his desire to continue negotiations with the Russian Federation on the conclusion of a peace treaty and is considering the possibilities of both his visit to Russia and Vladimir Putin’s visit to Tokyo, reports RIA News.



“Japan has not yet concluded a peace treaty with Russia after 70 years after the end of the war. I stubbornly want to resolve the territorial problem and promote negotiations on a peace treaty, ”said Abe.

“I want to hope for my trip to Russia, as well as for President Putin’s visit to Japan at the most appropriate time,” he stressed.

As the Nikkei newspaper noted, the prime minister “expressed his intention to visit Russia and hold talks with Putin before the G7 group summit, which is scheduled to be held in May this year in the Japanese prefecture of Mie”.

According to Abe, “Russia's constructive participation in solving international problems, including in the Middle East, is important.”

In December, a Japanese newspaper reported that the official Tokyo "is considering the possibility of holding an informal summit with Russia in Vladivostok or Khabarovsk in spring 2016."
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +76
    18 January 2016 09: 24
    and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands
    1. +58
      18 January 2016 09: 41
      To want is not harmful, it is harmful not to want!
      In general, this is a problem of Japan, not Russia. We have no territorial claims against Japan! NOT YET!!!
      1. +23
        18 January 2016 10: 23
        Quote: Login_Off
        In general, this is a problem of Japan, not Russia. We have no territorial claims against Japan! NOT YET!!!


        And not only this. Japan, following its "patron" and the EU, introduced sanctions against Russia, which means that it believes that it has the right to dictate to our country. It is very strange - a defeated country is showing a desire to normalize relations with a country against which it imposes some kind of sanctions under external pressure. Insanity, however.
        As for the Kuril Islands, as one Polish trumpeter said: "... ears from a herring ...". bully
        1. GDP
          -38
          18 January 2016 10: 52
          I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.
          1. +31
            18 January 2016 11: 09
            Quote: GDP
            I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.


            In no case! Let the Japanese go to the Kuril Islands, it’s the same as a goat in the garden with cabbage! Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever!
            1. +4
              18 January 2016 11: 19
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever!

              Nah, well, how touristslet them come. Yes
              1. GDP
                -11
                18 January 2016 12: 05
                In no case! Let the Japanese go to the Kuril Islands, it’s the same as a goat in the garden with cabbage! Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever

                Why not? Joint ventures with Japan on these islands would give only an impetus to the development of regions, they would still remain part of Russia, and a diplomatic crisis would be resolved, which would still cause significant damage to the development of our country.
                1. +4
                  18 January 2016 12: 14
                  there it is necessary to put the base .. bury it deeper into the rock .. the only non-freezing strait from the Sea of ​​Okhotsk there .. lock up the Pacific Fleet ???? betrayal ...
                  1. +10
                    18 January 2016 12: 52
                    I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.

                    It was this position that led to the loss of Svalbard by Russia.
                    Everything is much simpler:
                    They refuse territorial claims, and in return we sign a peace treaty with them.
                    They are driving American troops out of their territory, and in return we are building up economic cooperation with them.
                    1. 0
                      18 January 2016 12: 57
                      In Japan, it is not customary to say the word "no" in order to save the face of the interlocutor, therefore negotiations can drag on forever. After all, they cannot say "no" to Russian diplomats who are proposing to leave the Russians of Kunashir and others like him outside the framework of a peace treaty ...
                2. 0
                  18 January 2016 12: 19
                  I support this excellent offer !!!
              2. 0
                18 January 2016 14: 09
                In Siberia, remove the snow, but there is a lot of snow)))
              3. +2
                18 January 2016 17: 38
                I agree only on a visit with the purpose of repose, let them come there and conduct a sepuku rite (well, or Harakiri, it doesn’t matter to me), it’s better if Aba is at the head of it. We’ll put a crematorium there and dispel their ashes over the sea. But Japanese tourists have nothing to do there - they have already been there, that's enough.
            2. -11
              18 January 2016 11: 58
              You forgot that after the defeat of the Kwantung Army in Siberia and the Far East, hundreds of thousands of Japanese citizens worked, though as prisoners of war.
              And what do we see the dominance of the Japanese?

              In addition to Japanese cars, dominance is not observed.
              So let them master.
              But in what capacity is the question.
            3. +2
              18 January 2016 12: 35
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              Quote: GDP
              I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.


              In no case! Let the Japanese go to the Kuril Islands, it’s the same as a goat in the garden with cabbage! Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever!

              This is a very difficult problem. And the key role here, as Americans always play.

              They are blackmailing the Japanese with their presence in Japanese territories. And in case of a concession on the Kuril issues, they also threaten the rejection of some islands.

              The issue will be resolved by the legal expertise of all post-war agreements, beginning with the Yalta Conference of 1945, the Potsdam Conference of 1946 and the San Francisco Conference of 1951, at which the Portsmouth Treaty of 1905 was canceled when these islands passed to Japan.

              But now is not the time - for the sake of confrontation, all international norms are violated and there is no reason to hope for an objective assessment.
            4. +1
              18 January 2016 17: 09
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              In no case!

              Why? The Chinese were allowed into the Far East, passing over a hundred thousand hectares land for rent for 49 years? Why are the Japs worse? On the contrary, they are less dangerous than the Chinese. They do not have nuclear weapons.
              The cynicism of our government is amazingly quietly let the Chinese go, and in 50 years Kosovo will be in the Far East. Do not understand? It is unlikely that everyone understands. am
          2. +7
            18 January 2016 11: 14
            GDP - you can sign an agreement with the Japanese to share your garden!
          3. +2
            18 January 2016 12: 43
            Quote: GDP
            I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories.


            In connection with your bold proposal, I have only one question - the word zchazzzz! spelled with three or four s?
          4. +5
            18 January 2016 13: 01
            Quote: GDP
            I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.

            Even if you satisfy all the desires of the Japanese today, tomorrow they will roll out their new desires, but in a much larger volume. This is their pressure system, plus you are creating an official precedent for demands from another part of the border.
          5. -6
            18 January 2016 13: 10
            You end for this comment. Here they most often offer isolation and turn their backs on everyone))). Although a good half turned away from us already. We do not know how to cooperate MUTUALLY. How many countries have divorced us or continue to breed))). If we can always firmly defend our national interests, then do business with anyone. And if as usual, then you don’t know what is even better)
            1. +3
              18 January 2016 13: 33
              Quote: Svoy_tovarish
              Svoy_tovarish


              Are you UK? bully
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +1
              18 January 2016 17: 48
              If this half were good, I wouldn’t turn away. Here the key word is to collaborate, to share labor. But in reality, those who turned away (and whoever turns away) tried to become burials
          6. +6
            18 January 2016 13: 18
            You’ll get them the hell out of the way! We’ll figure it out for ourselves, all the more so soon we have to wait for the refugees of the Europeans, so they will populate.
      2. +4
        18 January 2016 10: 49
        And we, as they say, "neither cold nor hot" from your "want". While you are puppets of our "partners" what's the point of being friends with you?
    2. +15
      18 January 2016 09: 41
      One desire is not enough. hi
      What are the suggestions ??
      Namely, sign the existing borders!
      1. +13
        18 January 2016 09: 50
        Quote: dr.Bo
        What are the suggestions ??

        All this chatter is already tired of the order, I want, I do not want, our territories or not ours.
        All these double standards from our politicians have already gotten.
        It's time to openly declare that from a dead Donkey you have ears, not the territory of the Russian state.
        After all, waiting is worse than death. It's time for someone to make a responsible decision on their shoulders.
        And do not smear snot under the nose.
        1. +4
          18 January 2016 09: 56
          Quote: Sirocco
          After all, waiting is worse than death. It's time for someone to make a responsible decision on their shoulders.
          And do not smear snot under the nose.



          Hmm ... And we, Russia, are we expecting something ??? Or promise to give the Kuril Islands ???

          PS Although it’s true, it’s necessary to say one final time: stop whining, the Kuril Islands are Russian ... And do not even aim for dreams in Siberia and the Far East ...
          1. +1
            18 January 2016 10: 07
            Quote: veksha50
            . Although it’s true, you need to say one final time: stop whining, the Kuril Islands are Russian ...

            And I’m talking about this.
            1. +4
              18 January 2016 10: 35
              Quote: Sirocco
              And I’m talking about this.



              Here the Kuril Islands, the Kuril Islands, it’s just, let's say, the fork - they will give - they will not give ... And their secret claims are much greater ... therefore, you need to pull your ax with your head for a long time so that you don’t hit your tail in a hurry. ..
          2. +3
            18 January 2016 10: 09
            , you need to say one final time: stop whining,


            And add "Tsyts, mongrel, they talk with countries, and you are the territory occupied by the USA." smile Oh, you can’t let me go to work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Let the planet live a little longer.
            1. +1
              18 January 2016 11: 50
              Quote: dauria
              Oh, you can’t let me go to work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Let the planet live a little longer.



              Here, in VO, many cannot be allowed into the Ministry of Foreign Affairs ... Me - also first of all ...

              I am announcing the beginning of the list, which I myself would not give even a "bit": USA, Naglia, Japan, Turkey, Poland, the Baltic States ... damn it, the ink is out, I'll go to refill the fountain pen, the work will be long ...
          3. +12
            18 January 2016 10: 11
            They simply cherish the dream that Putin is not eternal and that someone like DAM, and even better drunk or labeled, can come to replace him! Then the question of the Kuril Islands can be put at full height! It is not for nothing that the West is now trying to revise the results of the Second World War, it is not for nothing that they are trying to make us aggressors along with Hitler! All hopes that after Putin, in Russia there will be no other Putin!
            1. +6
              18 January 2016 10: 48
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              They simply cherish the dream that Putin is not eternal and that someone like DAM, and even better drunk or labeled, can come to replace him!

              hi From many sources it is known that in Yeltsin's times, the Japanese made attempts to return the islands and persistent attempts. But even the EBN had the brains not to follow their lead. In modern Russia, nothing shines for the Japanese.
            2. 0
              18 January 2016 11: 11
              Here, I completely agree with you! "Comrade" Brzezinski, 15 years ago, said so: The last Soviet KGBist will leave, and we will finish Russia.
        2. +10
          18 January 2016 10: 32
          Quote: Sirocco
          It's time to openly declare that from a dead Donkey you have ears, not the territory of the Russian state.

          The fact of the matter is that they have repeatedly spoken at different levels, and it has been proved ... Construction of infrastructure, deployment of military personnel, visits by high-level officials ...
          And the fact that samurai are hysterical is no more than show-off. This is their ritual now. Do not pay attention. If a high-ranking politician in Japan does not mention the "northern territories", then competitors will devour him. this has nothing to do with reality.
          Our nuclear weapons are the most reliable seal on any "peace treaty".
        3. 0
          18 January 2016 10: 51
          And why not make it out of it, make a "dynamo" for them. Maybe the whole gop company will make hara kiri from a long wait laughing
        4. +1
          18 January 2016 11: 08
          Quote: Sirocco
          And do not smear snot under the nose.

          What snot ???
          Russia has long and firmly said everything!
        5. 0
          18 January 2016 23: 14
          Exactly. Why do yapis speak so insistently about islands? Because the government does not say solid no. But this is already annoying.
      2. +4
        18 January 2016 11: 32
        Quote: dr.Bo
        What are the suggestions ??

        Already have one ...
        Japan volunteered to "speak on behalf of" Russia at the upcoming G7 summit.
        The club of the leading powers of the world G-7, left without Russia, began to behave, to put it mildly, strange. Just yesterday, the mentoring countries that taught us how to live suddenly started vying to offer us cooperation. The last case - official Tokyo, during the upcoming summit of the Seven in this country in spring, is ready to “speak on behalf of” Russia and represent our interests.
        This was stated by Deputy Chairman of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan Komura Masahiko, the Asahi Shimbun newspaper writes.

        Does Russia need it?
        1. +1
          18 January 2016 12: 18
          Quote: Egoza
          Japan volunteered to "speak on behalf of" Russia at the upcoming G7 summit.

          So this is a "licking back" or what? belay
        2. +2
          18 January 2016 12: 27
          Quote: Egoza
          Does Russia need it?



          Russia needs to be respected and listened to ...

          And such handouts ... "To speak on behalf of Russia" ... Let North Korea or China speak at the UN on behalf of Japan, then they will understand what they are proposing ...

          PS A good film at one time was ... However, "The Fall of Japan" was called ...
    3. +4
      18 January 2016 09: 52
      and we will persistently refuse them this. The issue with the Kuril Islands has been resolved unconditionally. There was nothing to enter the war.
      1. +3
        18 January 2016 10: 18
        Let them first apologize that for 60 years they thought that the USSR bombed them with nuclear weapons, and then we will explain to them that there is no territorial problem.
        1. +4
          18 January 2016 10: 32
          the one who set the minus is near-minded or sitting on cookies, they really believed so until 2005-2007, while the Japanese official at the conference said to the TV cameras that they were Americans
          propaganda is a great thing ... The emperor did not say whose bomb was and did not say that there were two, but the Soviet Union recently entered the war

          therefore, the Japanese throughout the Cold War and even after that they believed that they capitulated to the Americans because they were bombed by the USSR and the USSR didn’t even give up - there’s no peace treaty
          so their brains work medieval

          Explain to them something until they understand how wrong they were and did not apologize - this is useless and superfluous ...
          Or let them understand this themselves or we must do everything in order.
    4. +7
      18 January 2016 09: 57
      In the context of international law, Russia has no territorial problems with Japan. I quote again: "... they will fix the post-war reality in the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty. Japan will not only sign this document, but also ratify it, renouncing" all rights, legal grounds and claims to the Kuril Islands and to that part of the island Sakhalin and the adjacent islands, over which Japan acquired sovereignty under the Treaty of Portsmouth dated September 5, 1905 ". But Japan has Wishlist - and these are internal Japanese problems, and by no means Japanese-Russian realities.
    5. +6
      18 January 2016 10: 00
      Quote: Hubun
      show cookies instead of the Kuril Islands

      The best way to resolve the territorial issue with Russia is to FORGET once FOREVER THIS QUESTION!
      1. +1
        18 January 2016 11: 41
        Quote: Tol100v
        The best way to resolve the territorial issue with Russia is to FORGET once FOREVER THIS QUESTION!

        And the Americans generally did not raise this topic until their mattresses were placed on these islands. Having made the dispute over the islands eternal and unsolvable, they have ensured that the rapprochement between Russia and Japan will not happen for many years. They raise the same pig between Europe and Russia, making the theme of the return of Crimea one of the main ones for lifting sanctions.
        But it seems to me, it is possible to discuss the conditions for the return of at least one island of Japan at a deliberately unacceptable level)))
        Well, like what you "busurman in a kimono" build in 5 years in Siberia and the Far East 40-50 cities, each for 100-150 thousand inhabitants with all the infrastructure, roads and airports. There are 80-100 factories around them, so that people have something to do ... and so on. etc for almost nothing
        What have the eyes hatched? Do you want an island ??? Well, whatever you want))) We were offended and do not discuss this topic anymore!
    6. +9
      18 January 2016 10: 30
      Quote: Hubun
      and we will show you the cookie instead of smoked

      We will show you something. The main thing is for Moscow to show the same thing. Little will change from our fig, but in Moscow ... Well, at least today no one in Moscow giggles, as in the 90s - "Kemsk volost? Yes, take it to your health! I thought ... I'm the king or not king?"

      For GDP, there is some kind of confidence, thank God ... And then, and around?

      However, the United States and Japan, along with them, and many others, did not expect the EBN to "get tired" so quickly, and even more so, the receiver of such a thing for all of them ... Otherwise, now it would be the Kuriles, and the Arctic, and the Baldin collection. ..

      Incidentally, I would give the Baltic collection to the Germans - just not for nothing, but would change it. To the Amber Room. Not restored, but the one they stole. I think the question would be closed. And for EVERY claim to our territory or to anything else, we have something to answer in the same spirit.

      A total of 427 museums (of which 173 in Russia) were destroyed or plundered by the Nazis during the war. The catalog of losses includes 1 177 291 storage units (museum items, rare books and manuscripts, archival files). Large libraries have lost over 100 million copies of books. 44 897 archival collections were destroyed - 63% of the archive fund of Russia.
      Do not accept any references to "displaced values" from the Germans! "War cancels all agreements" and "Woe to the vanquished!" Also, mind you, it was not the Russians who said ...
    7. 0
      18 January 2016 11: 06
      Quote: Hubun
      and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands

      The main thing here is not a territorial issue, but rapprochement with Russia. However, if he does not say this question, they will not understand him there. Politics!
    8. 0
      18 January 2016 12: 02
      Quote: Hubun
      and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands

      For Japan, there is only one solution to this issue - a free economic zone.
    9. +2
      18 January 2016 12: 33
      and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands
      -----------------------------------------
      I would like to believe, otherwise everything in my head revolves, as I straightened the border along the Amur River, the locals still spit.
    10. 0
      18 January 2016 13: 10
      I think that’s not why we began to invest money in the Kuril Islands on infrastructures and military camps in order to give them to my Japanese mom. In addition, we will not refuse to give up control of the only ice-free spill.
  2. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 26
    A thin world is better than a good quarrel. But the islands can not be given. The rocks are the same.
  3. +17
    18 January 2016 09: 27
    "I stubbornly want to resolve the territorial issue and move forward with negotiations on a peace treaty," Abe said.
    While there are temporary economic difficulties in Russia, I decided to try to push my own solution to the problem.
    There are spies with a strong body
    You are them at the door, they are at the window
    Say what's up with this thing
    We finished long ago ...
    1. Erg
      +3
      18 January 2016 09: 51
      If Vladimir Semyonovich were alive ... Now work for Him is not endless.
      1. +2
        18 January 2016 10: 41
        Quote: Erg
        If Vladimir Semyonovich were alive ... Now work for Him is not endless.

        If Vladimir Semyonovich had not died in the 80s, then with his heightened sense of justice and conscience, he would have shot himself in the 90s. When the country, for which he so worried with all his heart, was torn to pieces by the greedy and insatiable. Those who "came the country of Limonia, a continuous suitcase" ... No, with SUCH soul he would not have survived those times ...

        PS And Vladimir Semenych would personally strangle Dzhigurdu ... am
  4. Boos
    +26
    18 January 2016 09: 27
    We have no territorial problems in the Far East, you can not come ...
    1. +2
      18 January 2016 10: 03
      Quote: Boos
      We have no territorial problems in the Far East, you can not come ...

      We have no territorial problems in the Far East, and the absence of a peace treaty somehow does not soar.
  5. +7
    18 January 2016 09: 29
    It is customary to compare human stubbornness with a donkey, but at least a donkey can be moved from a place, and what with these ?! !!
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 10: 04
      Quote: B.T.W.
      , but at least a donkey can be moved from a place, and what with these ?!

      Only pi ... shkoy, and very terrible in strength!
    2. 0
      18 January 2016 10: 39
      Quote: B.T.W.
      Human stubbornness is usually compared with a donkey
      Obsession with the return of the "northern territories" will lead Abe to a psychiatric hospital wassat
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      18 January 2016 12: 02
      Quote: B.T.W.
      It is customary to compare human stubbornness with a donkey, but at least a donkey can be moved from a place, and what with these ?! !!

      Another "stimulus" - a sharpened stick, which poked the donkey in the ass.
  6. +15
    18 January 2016 09: 31
    You give a peace treaty without territorial concessions !!!
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 10: 12
      Quote: VohaAhov
      peace treaty without territorial concessions
      Hopefully, Abe also counts on this. He probably understands that Russia (especially under Putin) will not give up the islands, but without Russia, Japan will never gain sovereignty and will be used by the United States to unleash large wars in the region.
  7. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 31
    The Japanese have not received stars for a long time, they want to refresh memory?
  8. +8
    18 January 2016 09: 31
    Well, he wants to settle it, well, please. Sign the peace treaty and go back to your Hokaido.
    1. +4
      18 January 2016 10: 09
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Well, he wants to settle it, well, please. Sign the peace treaty and go back to your Hokaido.

      Not! The peace treaty concocted by the Americans in 1945 cannot be signed, this will mean automatic territorial concessions on our part. Stalin did not just refuse to sign it. The Japs need the signing of this peace treaty, but we don’t! If they agree to our version of the peace treaty, then we will sign it, and that one must be canceled! Otherwise, let them stick their peace treaty in their ass! I think it was something of that kind that Joseph Vissarionovich said to them then.
  9. +4
    18 January 2016 09: 31
    The Japanese are cunning and patient - they will wait for the arrival of a more accommodating President of Russia than Putin
    1. +5
      18 January 2016 09: 35
      Quote: Gray 43
      The Japanese are cunning and patient - they will wait for the arrival of a more accommodating President of Russia than Putin


      Then it was necessary to negotiate with "Mr. Gorby" or "friend Boris".
      1. +2
        18 January 2016 10: 25
        Look how much this territory which is not accommodating to China secretly gave away!
    2. +1
      18 January 2016 10: 49
      Quote: Gray 43
      The Japanese are cunning and patient - they will wait for the arrival of a more accommodating President of Russia than Putin

      The Chinese say that if you sit on the river for a long time, then the corpse of your enemy will surely float past you. Here are the Japanese as the Chinese - they sit and wait. And with them the Americans. I once read - for the 2024 year, the mass media entertainers from the CIA have already developed so many exciting and massive events for Russia!

      They themselves could reach the 2024-th ...
  10. +9
    18 January 2016 09: 36
    For seventy years they lived without a peace treaty, but then, suddenly they got plowed ?! What is he seeking ?! recourse (Kuril Islands - do not offer ...! Theme is closed!)
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 09: 55
      Quote: BRUTAL
      suddenly plowed up ?! What is he seeking ?!

      Maybe they themselves want to join Russia? lol
      1. 0
        18 January 2016 10: 27
        Quote: Sirocco
        Maybe they themselves want to join Russia?
        Why so soon? We can talk about joining the EAEU.
  11. +8
    18 January 2016 09: 36
    not an inch of land
  12. +5
    18 January 2016 09: 38
    Clinical case
  13. +7
    18 January 2016 09: 38
    Gee, the Japs want to be part of the Russian Federation as a subject in the Far Eastern Federal District? laughing Buryats are present in Cossacks, why are the Japs worse? Let’s take the Japanese Slavs under the sauce of the slavish association of the Slavs? laughing laughing laughing
  14. +5
    18 January 2016 09: 39
    Forget about the islands and the problem will disappear.
  15. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 39
    Conclude a contract who is against. Only without wet mriy of the Ukrin sample.
  16. +5
    18 January 2016 09: 43
    What could be negotiations on a peace treaty with an American-occupied country? They will expel the invaders, then we can talk about something.
  17. +7
    18 January 2016 09: 44
    Russia has no problems with territories, but Japan has. It turns out that Japan wants to solve its problem at the expense of Russia. Nothing personal - it is not profitable for Russia. Now, if Russia grows in the Japanese region, then of course, you need to think about it. But in general, the price of these islands is high - paid by the blood and lives of our soldiers, nothing to pay Japan, and also, as a vassal can make transactions on their own, nonsense.
  18. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 44
    The Japanese, as usual, bring down the problems of their heads for health.
    1. Erg
      +1
      18 January 2016 09: 54
      Pug wants to conclude a non-aggression pact with an elephant ... laughing In my opinion, squinted megalomania.
  19. +4
    18 January 2016 09: 44
    Stubbornness - a sign of D. Urakov!
  20. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 45
    Even fully aware of the futility of trying to take possession of the "Northern Territories," Mr. Shinzo tries to be very persistent in his attempts. This undoubtedly adds points to him in domestic politics. The image of the collector of lands and the bearer of the imperial Japanese spirit pleases ordinary Japanese. Well, let them rejoice for their prime minister. He will probably fly to Moscow with a portfolio of investment proposals for the Kuril Islands. It will be beneficial for us to trade and develop, if this in no way violates the sovereignty of the Russian land.
  21. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 47
    Then it was necessary to negotiate with "Mr. Gorby" or "friend Boris". [/ Quote]

    So they tried at EBN, I almost drank then. Our special services were then able to disrupt this agreement.
    http://www.izh.kp.ru/daily/26473.7/3342621/
  22. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 47
    I can not imagine how the Russian leadership can transfer the Kuril Islands to the Japanese in exchange for a peace treaty.
    How's that?
    To expel people from there from the acquired lands? Deprive housing, work?
    Collapse all military facilities?
    It will look like a betrayal by the state, not otherwise.
    Only a wimp can return the conquered territories back, that’s exactly what it will look like from the perspective of politics, accordingly, side effects also follow.
    They will talk with us even tougher, not putting anything.
  23. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 47
    We are only FOR .... according to the world war! Our Kuril Islands and Basta. Or they’ll come up with a faq!
  24. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 48
    ... I persistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty, ”Abe said.
    This phrase from the mouth of the Japanese prime minister sounds like "Give up the islands." And the islands cannot be given away, even if they did not have any value and the territorial waters did not depend on them. Because a precedent. That's all. Today you give away the unnecessary rock, tomorrow Sakhalin will be demanded from you, Kamchatka the day after tomorrow and so on.
  25. Riv
    +2
    18 January 2016 09: 48
    Want, as they say, is not forbidden.
  26. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 49
    What is the problem? Come on Hokkaido syudy - then we’ll definitely agree.
  27. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 49
    he stubbornly wants to take our islands to himself))
  28. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 49
    “I insistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty,” Abe said.

    And what is there to settle, a treaty must be concluded, but forget about the islands, about ... whether it is so about ... whether (well, in the sense of losing) and there is nothing to talk about.
  29. +1
    18 January 2016 09: 50
    Let him crawl on 4 bones to Moscow and every ten meters bows, every kilometer prays that Russia will sign a peace treaty on Russian and non-Japanese terms, or else suddenly Russia will stand up for the DPRK or in a closer alliance with China and Japan will remain on "BOBAH" ...
  30. +2
    18 January 2016 09: 51
    We have to wait another one, they've been waiting for 70 years, we’ll wait a bit. a moment is needed when Japan is more accommodating. Russia will not become more accommodating, since the Japanese didn’t succeed in the 90s, now it’s definitely not going to talk.
  31. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 51
    Then I agree with Romanov
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Well, he wants to settle it, well, please. Sign the peace treaty and go back to your Hokaido.
    .
    The hare came to the forest for a tree, the bear says: "Take the birch and leave"
    The hare replies: "Why, it's New Year!"
    The bear repeats its own.
    The hare shouts: "Give me a pine tree at least!"
    The bear says: "Here, pine trees. Then take a birch and ... (leave)."
  32. +3
    18 January 2016 09: 52
    In Russia, enough land Japan does not need to sit at home.
  33. 0
    18 January 2016 09: 52
    A peace treaty can be concluded only after the complete elimination of the consequences of the war. Let them first get the withdrawal of the American occupation forces, and then they stutter about the peace treaty with us. wink
  34. 0
    18 January 2016 09: 53
    Japan needs to forget about the islands, and the peace treaty is even today.
    Not for the peace treaty, give the whole thing to the Japanese, and they mislead their people, why create problems?
    They can’t keep track of their territory, if the lands are few, why did American bases go empty? Argue with the USA - let the base clean.
  35. 0
    18 January 2016 09: 53
    "" Japan still has not concluded a peace treaty with Russia 70 years after the end of the war. I persistently want to resolve the territorial issue"...

    It’s a pity that our people did not take Okinawa at the time ...
    Well, let him first resolve the territorial problem with it, actually occupied by the United States ...
  36. 0
    18 January 2016 09: 54
    "Want is not harmful"
    "It is harmful not to want."
  37. +1
    18 January 2016 09: 56
    From a dead donkey ears to you and not the Kuril Islands hi
  38. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 00
    I don’t know how the Japanese are with you, but everything is settled with the Kuril people in us)) we are already building to the full.
  39. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 02
    And what is there to regulate, everything was regulated 70 years ago. If they want to sign a peace treaty on the current conditions, for God's sake, we are not opposed.
  40. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 03
    Let them be aware that the Ukrainian leader, that the Japanese, is one verse from an old Soviet song. Why is it written and for what it was sung: When did I finish swimming far,
    That kissed granite on the marinas
    In my native Crimea and in Vladivostok, I
    Oh, on the Kuril Islands
    On our farthest islands. (c) 1953
  41. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 04
    I have read the "UROTO" I want. Wish on.
  42. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 05
    Want is not harmful...
  43. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 06
    Russia has no territorial problems, so alas, there will be no peace treaty laughing
  44. +2
    18 January 2016 10: 08
    I do not know. As for me, this is an attempt to get a bridgehead before a new war.
    They’ll get the island’s yapes and give them to the Americans under the base,
    for writing off part of the national debt. Or maybe the Americans promised them something
    more attractive, since the Japanese are so cut into the account of the contract.
    But the islands definitely need to be strengthened as soon as possible
    and as powerful as possible.
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 12: 45
      Our straits, in one fell swoop to block our access to the operational space, they want. If they are allowed to give at least one island, our Pacific Fleet is worthless. I’m not talking about the Sea of ​​Okhotsk yet. Yes, and the Russian Far East as a whole. These minuscule points on the map have too high a price!
  45. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 09
    Russia has no territorial problems with Japan. And I hope it won't. And then there may be no Japan either. In the form in which it is now.
  46. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 11
    we don’t seem to have territorial problems for a long time .. especially in the Kuril Islands .. it’s their problems that always arise. soldier
  47. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 15
    We must say "We are not ready to negotiate because of the sanctions", and what if they (the sanctions) will be lifted someday, answer "Sorry, this territorial issue is contrary to our national security" laughing
  48. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 15
    Why are they trying to load us with their problems? We don’t have them ...
  49. SNG
    +2
    18 January 2016 10: 16
    In the spirit of European diplomacy, you can somehow do this:
    1. remove American military bases
    2. join the EEC
    and it will be visible there.
  50. vit
    +1
    18 January 2016 10: 16
    “I insistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty,” Abe said.
    oh, yes the problem is solved simply! Really for 70 years nobody guessed ?! so that there are no border disputes between Japan and Russia, Japan must be included in Russia! elementary! drinks
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 12: 39
      What a self-confident samurai. Learned to yap at the Balts! After all, the most high-tech island can be drowned by the most primitive technology.
    2. 0
      18 January 2016 12: 52
      This will not happen because of the difference in mentality, two wells with a charge are simpler and cheaper. And how is the song? I am a wave, a new wave, Below me will be the whole country Wait, soon forever, I will flood your cities.
  51. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 17
    “I insistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty,” Abe said.

    What if we set a condition for “advancing negotiations on a peace treaty” - the withdrawal of American bases from Japanese territory? (not the conditions for the “transfer” of the islands, but the start of negotiations).
    It will be interesting to see their reaction and the reaction of the United States. This is where all desire for “promotion” will immediately disappear, and Shinzo ABe himself will also disappear somewhere.
  52. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 19
    The Japanese are fussing because they have finally understood the main thing - because of their policies, they can no longer even dream of islands. At one time they were offered two islands, joint development of the islands, but the “Japanese spirit” overpowered reason. As a result, we were left with vague hopes for another hundred years.
  53. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 20
    What is there to regulate? Lost the war? Lost. Have you signed an agreement? Signed. Everything has been settled for a long time. All that remains is to stop the hysteria and come to terms.
  54. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 22
    I I I. What does he think he is?
  55. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 35
    “I insistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty,” Abe said.


    You have already been told more than once that Russia and Japan do not have any territorial problems. And put your peace treaty in one place.
    So, if you are a real samurai, then it’s time to do sepukku!
  56. +1
    18 January 2016 10: 36
    Japanese Prime Minister: “I want to settle the territorial problem hard” with Russia
  57. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 40
    They need to agree on this with the State Department first. If they give the go-ahead, then everything will resolve itself, because the Japanese will agree to any conditions.
  58. 0
    18 January 2016 10: 52
    The Yaps realized that the ongoing defensive construction and deployment of modern weapons on the “disputed” islands was dramatically increasing the “selling price” of these islands, which made them think about the gloomy prospects for their claims. We've already talked about donkey ears.
  59. +1
    18 January 2016 11: 03
    And his wishes touch me.
    The territorial problem must be solved.
    Peace treaty - promote.
  60. +1
    18 January 2016 11: 06
    The Swedish envoy asks Kem parish...
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 11: 09
      It's good that Putin is not Bunsha. laughing
  61. 0
    18 January 2016 11: 12
    The so-called issue of the northern territories arose from the persistent desire of the United States to build a base there. Apparently, the Americans have not yet given up on this desire.
  62. 0
    18 January 2016 11: 18
    It’s a formality, but a peace treaty drawn up in writing still won’t hurt, but without hysteria once again about the “northern territories”...
  63. 0
    18 January 2016 11: 31
    It's yours, not the islands))
  64. ZSP
    0
    18 January 2016 11: 45
    Well, let him come, let’s listen to what he wants to discuss, we’ll tell you how it goes
  65. 0
    18 January 2016 11: 46
    Japan, our Western “partners,” are persistently pushing Japan to sign a peace treaty and, as a result, want to get the islands. And then, given this precedent, cut Russia piece by piece where possible, and what if it works out. But the GDP has been ignoring invitations regarding this topic for almost two years now. Break off the “stone flower” with it. On the other hand, they are inviting too persistently; are they preparing a provocation against the Dark One?
  66. +1
    18 January 2016 12: 06
    The prime minister of the country that supported sanctions against us, and continues to support them, is going to settle something? Moreover, they need this something more than we do, i.e. you need to act as a petitioner. Has he even heard of diplomacy?
  67. 0
    18 January 2016 12: 27
    It feels like they are so bruised with their sake that in the morning they can’t remember anything, and this “Groundhog Day” begins with the idea: “Let’s take the Kurillas from Russia and call them northern territories!”
    1. 0
      18 January 2016 12: 43
      So, let’s take Alaska back!!!
  68. 0
    18 January 2016 12: 39
    As they say, there is no harm in wanting. But still, arrogant, the defeated country dictates its terms to the winner! Oh well. However, this is understandable, they have such a psychology that if they were not finished off in due time, it means they showed weakness. They don't understand it any other way.
  69. 0
    18 January 2016 12: 59
    «I stubbornly want to resolve the territorial problem” with Russia

    We know what the cross-eyed...they want, Russia has always fought with the Turks and Japanese in the east. No islands! Have the Turks really taught us nothing again? Even in their sleep they grind their teeth from hatred of Russia, besides, we don’t feel cold from their world, anyway, everything will be decided by Fashington! am
  70. 0
    18 January 2016 12: 59
    We have no territorial problems. Dot! And their problems should not interest us....
  71. 0
    18 January 2016 13: 27
    Quote: GDP
    I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.

    Actually, they see Sakhalin as theirs, should they also allow it to be developed? Then the Far East, Siberia, and in about a hundred years they will reach Moscow. And given the population size of the Russian Federation and Japan, there will be a ratio of 95% Japanese to 5% of ours. Then you can’t kick them out of there, but this is a new conflict and worse.
    And they won’t agree to this; they need the return of the islands, and not permission to develop them.
  72. 0
    18 January 2016 15: 10
    Prime Minister of Japan: “I stubbornly want...”

    To paraphrase a famous expression:
    “He wants it, he wants it... Yes, who will give it to him?”©

    Continue to "want", Mr. Minister.

    “To want is not harmful, but not to want is harmful...” ©

    PS.

    Can you imagine WHAT annoyance the Japanese are now strangling? After all, in the days of EBN, “the question
    northern territories" - seemed "almost decided."

    Well, at least one island - they could definitely get it.
    It seemed “not enough.”

    Then, the “window of opportunity” decreased, but did not close: they were offered
    joint development of natural resources.
    Again, it seemed “not enough.”

    Well, now, all that’s left for the greedy samurai is: “The ears of a dead donkey!”©

    Our answer is more than transparent: “Russia will strengthen its fleet in the Pacific Ocean to confront Japan” ©(http://lenta.ru/news/2016/01/18/newsubs/)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"