Military Review

Japanese Prime Minister: “I want to settle the territorial problem hard” with Russia

133
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced his desire to continue negotiations with the Russian Federation on the conclusion of a peace treaty and is considering the possibilities of both his visit to Russia and Vladimir Putin’s visit to Tokyo, reports RIA News.




“Japan has not yet concluded a peace treaty with Russia after 70 years after the end of the war. I stubbornly want to resolve the territorial problem and promote negotiations on a peace treaty, ”said Abe.

“I want to hope for my trip to Russia, as well as for President Putin’s visit to Japan at the most appropriate time,” he stressed.

As the Nikkei newspaper noted, the prime minister “expressed his intention to visit Russia and hold talks with Putin before the G7 group summit, which is scheduled to be held in May this year in the Japanese prefecture of Mie”.

According to Abe, “Russia's constructive participation in solving international problems, including in the Middle East, is important.”

In December, a Japanese newspaper reported that the official Tokyo "is considering the possibility of holding an informal summit with Russia in Vladivostok or Khabarovsk in spring 2016."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
133 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hubun
    Hubun 18 January 2016 09: 24 New
    76
    and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands
    1. Login_Off
      Login_Off 18 January 2016 09: 41 New
      58
      To want is not harmful, it is harmful not to want!
      In general, this is a problem of Japan, not Russia. We have no territorial claims against Japan! NOT YET!!!
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 18 January 2016 10: 23 New
        23
        Quote: Login_Off
        In general, this is a problem of Japan, not Russia. We have no territorial claims against Japan! NOT YET!!!


        And not only this. Japan, following its "patron" and the EU, imposed sanctions against Russia, which means it believes that it has the right to dictate to our country. It is very strange - a defeated country shows a desire to normalize relations with a country against which it imposes some kind of sanctions against external pressure. Insanity, however.
        With regards to the Kuril Islands, as one Polish trumpeter said: "... ears from a herring ...". bully
        1. GDP
          GDP 18 January 2016 10: 52 New
          -38
          I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.
          1. Diana Ilyina
            Diana Ilyina 18 January 2016 11: 09 New
            31
            Quote: GDP
            I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.


            In no case! Let the Japanese go to the Kuril Islands, it’s the same as a goat in the garden with cabbage! Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever!
            1. zanoza
              zanoza 18 January 2016 11: 19 New
              +4
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever!

              Nah, well, how touristslet them come. yes
              1. GDP
                GDP 18 January 2016 12: 05 New
                -11
                In no case! Let the Japanese go to the Kuril Islands, it’s the same as a goat in the garden with cabbage! Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever

                Why not? Joint ventures with Japan on these islands would give only an impetus to the development of regions, they would still remain part of Russia, and a diplomatic crisis would be resolved, which would still cause significant damage to the development of our country.
                1. Yak-3P
                  Yak-3P 18 January 2016 12: 14 New
                  +4
                  there it is necessary to put the base .. bury it deeper into the rock .. the only non-freezing strait from the Sea of ​​Okhotsk there .. lock up the Pacific Fleet ???? betrayal ...
                  1. Mahmut
                    Mahmut 18 January 2016 12: 52 New
                    10
                    I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.

                    It was this position that led to the loss of Svalbard by Russia.
                    Everything is much simpler:
                    They refuse territorial claims, and in return we sign a peace treaty with them.
                    They are driving American troops out of their territory, and in return we are building up economic cooperation with them.
                    1. AlexTires
                      AlexTires 18 January 2016 12: 57 New
                      0
                      In Japan, it is not customary to say the word "no" to save the face of the interlocutor, therefore, negotiations can last forever. After all, they cannot say no to Russian diplomats who offer to leave Russian Kunashir and others like him, outside the framework of a peace treaty ...
                2. Platonich
                  Platonich 18 January 2016 12: 19 New
                  0
                  I support this excellent offer !!!
              2. air wolf
                air wolf 18 January 2016 14: 09 New
                0
                In Siberia, remove the snow, but there is a lot of snow)))
              3. faridg7
                faridg7 18 January 2016 17: 38 New
                +2
                I agree only on a visit with the purpose of repose, let them come there and conduct a sepuku rite (well, or Harakiri, it doesn’t matter to me), it’s better if Aba is at the head of it. We’ll put a crematorium there and dispel their ashes over the sea. But Japanese tourists have nothing to do there - they have already been there, that's enough.
            2. demo
              demo 18 January 2016 11: 58 New
              -11
              You forgot that after the defeat of the Kwantung Army in Siberia and the Far East, hundreds of thousands of Japanese citizens worked, though as prisoners of war.
              And what do we see the dominance of the Japanese?

              In addition to Japanese cars, dominance is not observed.
              So let them master.
              But in what capacity is the question.
            3. iConst
              iConst 18 January 2016 12: 35 New
              +2
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              Quote: GDP
              I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.


              In no case! Let the Japanese go to the Kuril Islands, it’s the same as a goat in the garden with cabbage! Yapi must forget about the Kuril Islands forever!

              This is a very difficult problem. And the key role here, as Americans always play.

              They are blackmailing the Japanese with their presence in Japanese territories. And in case of a concession on the Kuril issues, they also threaten the rejection of some islands.

              The issue will be resolved by the legal expertise of all post-war agreements, beginning with the Yalta Conference of 1945, the Potsdam Conference of 1946 and the San Francisco Conference of 1951, at which the Portsmouth Treaty of 1905 was canceled when these islands passed to Japan.

              But now is not the time - for the sake of confrontation, all international norms are violated and there is no reason to hope for an objective assessment.
            4. Ingvar 72
              Ingvar 72 18 January 2016 17: 09 New
              +1
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              In no case!

              Why? The Chinese were allowed into the Far East, passing over a hundred thousand hectares land for rent for 49 years? Why are the Japs worse? On the contrary, they are less dangerous than the Chinese. They do not have nuclear weapons.
              The cynicism of our government is amazingly quietly let the Chinese go, and in 50 years Kosovo will be in the Far East. Do not understand? It is unlikely that everyone understands. am
          2. Great-grandfather of Zeus
            Great-grandfather of Zeus 18 January 2016 11: 14 New
            +7
            GDP - you can sign an agreement with the Japanese to share your garden!
          3. Mikhail Krapivin
            Mikhail Krapivin 18 January 2016 12: 43 New
            +2
            Quote: GDP
            I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories.


            In connection with your bold proposal, I have only one question - the word zchazzzz! spelled with three or four s?
          4. Genry
            Genry 18 January 2016 13: 01 New
            +5
            Quote: GDP
            I think it would be possible to sign an agreement with Japan on joint economic development of disputed territories, but only taking into account the fact that legally these territories should remain part of Russia.

            Even if you satisfy all the desires of the Japanese today, tomorrow they will roll out their new desires, but in a much larger volume. This is their pressure system, plus you are creating an official precedent for demands from another part of the border.
          5. Svoy_tovarish
            Svoy_tovarish 18 January 2016 13: 10 New
            -6
            You end for this comment. Here they most often offer isolation and turn their backs on everyone))). Although a good half turned away from us already. We do not know how to cooperate MUTUALLY. How many countries have divorced us or continue to breed))). If we can always firmly defend our national interests, then do business with anyone. And if as usual, then you don’t know what is even better)
            1. Lelek
              Lelek 18 January 2016 13: 33 New
              +3
              Quote: Svoy_tovarish
              Svoy_tovarish


              Are you UK? bully
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. faridg7
              faridg7 18 January 2016 17: 48 New
              +1
              If this half were good, I wouldn’t turn away. Here the key word is to collaborate, to share labor. But in reality, those who turned away (and whoever turns away) tried to become burials
          6. Evpatiy.
            Evpatiy. 18 January 2016 13: 18 New
            +6
            You’ll get them the hell out of the way! We’ll figure it out for ourselves, all the more so soon we have to wait for the refugees of the Europeans, so they will populate.
      2. andre
        andre 18 January 2016 10: 49 New
        +4
        And as they say, “neither cold nor hot” from this “I want you”. While you are puppets of our "partners", is it good to be friends with you?
    2. dr.Bo
      dr.Bo 18 January 2016 09: 41 New
      15
      One desire is not enough. hi
      What are the suggestions ??
      Namely, sign the existing borders!
      1. Sirocco
        Sirocco 18 January 2016 09: 50 New
        13
        Quote: dr.Bo
        What are the suggestions ??

        All this chatter is already tired of the order, I want, I do not want, our territories or not ours.
        All these double standards from our politicians have already gotten.
        It's time to openly declare that from a dead Donkey you have ears, not the territory of the Russian state.
        After all, waiting is worse than death. It's time for someone to make a responsible decision on their shoulders.
        And do not smear snot under the nose.
        1. veksha50
          veksha50 18 January 2016 09: 56 New
          +4
          Quote: Sirocco
          After all, waiting is worse than death. It's time for someone to make a responsible decision on their shoulders.
          And do not smear snot under the nose.



          Hmm ... And we, Russia, are we expecting something ??? Or promise to give the Kuril Islands ???

          PS Although it’s true, it’s necessary to say one final time: stop whining, the Kuril Islands are Russian ... And do not even aim for dreams in Siberia and the Far East ...
          1. Sirocco
            Sirocco 18 January 2016 10: 07 New
            +1
            Quote: veksha50
            . Although it’s true, you need to say one final time: stop whining, the Kuril Islands are Russian ...

            And I’m talking about this.
            1. veksha50
              veksha50 18 January 2016 10: 35 New
              +4
              Quote: Sirocco
              And I’m talking about this.



              Here the Kuril Islands, the Kuril Islands, it’s just, let's say, the fork - they will give - they will not give ... And their secret claims are much greater ... therefore, you need to pull your ax with your head for a long time so that you don’t hit your tail in a hurry. ..
          2. dauria
            dauria 18 January 2016 10: 09 New
            +3
            , you need to say one final time: stop whining,


            And add "Tsyts, mongrel, talking to countries, and you-the territory occupied by the United States." smile Oh, you can’t let me go to work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Let the planet live a little longer.
            1. veksha50
              veksha50 18 January 2016 11: 50 New
              +1
              Quote: dauria
              Oh, you can’t let me go to work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Let the planet live a little longer.



              Here, in VO, many cannot be allowed into the Ministry of Foreign Affairs ... Me - also first of all ...

              I announce the beginning of the list, which I myself wouldn’t even give a bit: the USA, Naglia, Japan, Turkey, Poland, the Baltic states ... damn it, ink is over, I’ll go to refill the pen, the work will be long ...
          3. Diana Ilyina
            Diana Ilyina 18 January 2016 10: 11 New
            12
            They simply cherish the dream that Putin is not eternal and that someone like DAM, and even better drunk or labeled, can come to replace him! Then the question of the Kuril Islands can be put at full height! It is not for nothing that the West is now trying to revise the results of the Second World War, it is not for nothing that they are trying to make us aggressors along with Hitler! All hopes that after Putin, in Russia there will be no other Putin!
            1. BARKHAN
              BARKHAN 18 January 2016 10: 48 New
              +6
              Quote: Diana Ilyina
              They simply cherish the dream that Putin is not eternal and that someone like DAM, and even better drunk or labeled, can come to replace him!

              hi From many sources it is known that in Yeltsin's times, the Japanese made attempts to return the islands and persistent attempts. But even the EBN had the brains not to follow their lead. In modern Russia, nothing shines for the Japanese.
            2. Sober
              Sober 18 January 2016 11: 11 New
              0
              Here, I completely agree with you! "Tovarisch" Brzezinski, about 15 years ago, said so: the last Soviet KGB player will leave, and we will finish Russia.
        2. BARKHAN
          BARKHAN 18 January 2016 10: 32 New
          10
          Quote: Sirocco
          It's time to openly declare that from a dead Donkey you have ears, not the territory of the Russian state.

          The fact of the matter is that they have repeatedly spoken at different levels, and it has been proved ... Construction of infrastructure, deployment of military personnel, visits by high-level officials ...
          And the fact that samurai fight in hysterics is nothing more than show-offs. They now have such a ritual. No need to pay attention. If a high-ranking politician in Japan does not mention the "northern territories", then his competitors will devour him. this has nothing to do with realities.
          Our nuclear weapons are the most reliable seal on any "peace treaty."
        3. andre
          andre 18 January 2016 10: 51 New
          0
          And why not make a fuss out of it, make them a “dynamo." Maybe the whole gop company hara kiri from a long wait will make laughing
        4. Sober
          Sober 18 January 2016 11: 08 New
          +1
          Quote: Sirocco
          And do not smear snot under the nose.

          What snot ???
          Russia has long and firmly said everything!
        5. Russiamoy
          Russiamoy 18 January 2016 23: 14 New
          0
          Exactly. Why do yapis speak so insistently about islands? Because the government does not say solid no. But this is already annoying.
      2. Egoza
        Egoza 18 January 2016 11: 32 New
        +4
        Quote: dr.Bo
        What are the suggestions ??

        Already have one ...
        Japan volunteered to "speak on behalf of" Russia at the upcoming G7 summit.
        The club of the leading powers of the world G-7, left without Russia, began to behave, to put it mildly, strange. Just yesterday, the mentoring countries that taught us how to live suddenly started vying to offer us cooperation. The last case - official Tokyo, during the upcoming summit of the Seven in this country in spring, is ready to “speak on behalf of” Russia and represent our interests.
        This was stated by Deputy Chairman of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan Komura Masahiko, the Asahi Shimbun newspaper writes.

        Does Russia need it?
        1. BARKHAN
          BARKHAN 18 January 2016 12: 18 New
          +1
          Quote: Egoza
          Japan volunteered to "speak on behalf of" Russia at the upcoming G7 summit.

          So is this a “licking deflection” or something? belay
        2. veksha50
          veksha50 18 January 2016 12: 27 New
          +2
          Quote: Egoza
          Does Russia need it?



          Russia needs to be respected and listened to ...

          And such handouts ... "Speak on behalf of Russia" ... Well, let the DPRK or China speak at the UN on behalf of Japan, then they will understand what they are offering ...

          PS A good movie at one time was ... However, the "Death of Japan" was called ...
    3. Dreiko11
      Dreiko11 18 January 2016 09: 52 New
      +4
      and we will persistently refuse them this. The issue with the Kuril Islands has been resolved unconditionally. There was nothing to enter the war.
      1. Scraptor
        Scraptor 18 January 2016 10: 18 New
        +3
        Let them first apologize that for 60 years they thought that the USSR bombed them with nuclear weapons, and then we will explain to them that there is no territorial problem.
        1. Scraptor
          Scraptor 18 January 2016 10: 32 New
          +4
          the one who set the minus is near-minded or sitting on cookies, they really believed so until 2005-2007, while the Japanese official at the conference said to the TV cameras that they were Americans
          propaganda is a great thing ... The emperor did not say whose bomb was and did not say that there were two, but the Soviet Union recently entered the war

          therefore, the Japanese throughout the Cold War and even after that they believed that they capitulated to the Americans because they were bombed by the USSR and the USSR didn’t even give up - there’s no peace treaty
          so their brains work medieval

          Explain to them something until they understand how wrong they were and did not apologize - this is useless and superfluous ...
          Or let them understand this themselves or we must do everything in order.
    4. Blondy
      Blondy 18 January 2016 09: 57 New
      +7
      In the context of international law, Russia has no territorial problems with Japan. I quote once again: "... they will record the post-war reality in the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty. Japan will not only sign this document, but also ratify it, renouncing" all rights, rights and claims to the Kuril Islands and to that part of the island "Sakhalin and the islands adjacent to it, over which Japan acquired sovereignty under the Portsmouth Treaty of September 5, 1905." But Japan has Wishlist - and these are internal Japanese problems, and not the Japanese-Russian realities.
    5. tol100v
      tol100v 18 January 2016 10: 00 New
      +6
      Quote: Hubun
      show cookies instead of the Kuril Islands

      The best way to resolve the territorial issue with Russia is to FORGET once FOREVER THIS QUESTION!
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 18 January 2016 11: 41 New
        +1
        Quote: Tol100v
        The best way to resolve the territorial issue with Russia is to FORGET once FOREVER THIS QUESTION!

        And the Americans generally did not raise this topic until their mattresses were placed on these islands. Having made the dispute over the islands eternal and unsolvable, they have ensured that the rapprochement between Russia and Japan will not happen for many years. They raise the same pig between Europe and Russia, making the theme of the return of Crimea one of the main ones for lifting sanctions.
        But it seems to me, it is possible to discuss the conditions for the return of at least one island of Japan at a deliberately unacceptable level)))
        Well, like the fact that you are a “kimono busurman”, build 5-40 cities in Siberia and the Far East in 50 years, each for 100-150 thousand inhabitants with all infrastructure, roads and airports. Around them are 80-100 factories, so that the people would have something to do ..... etc. etc almost for nothing
        What have the eyes hatched? Do you want an island ??? Well, whatever you want))) We were offended and do not discuss this topic anymore!
    6. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 18 January 2016 10: 30 New
      +9
      Quote: Hubun
      and we will show you the cookie instead of smoked

      We will show you something. The main thing is for Moscow to show the same thing. Little will change from our cookie, but in Moscow ... Well, at least no one giggles in Moscow today, as in 90 - "Kemsku volost? Take it to health! I thought ... I’m the king or not king?"

      For GDP, there is some kind of confidence, thank God ... And then, and around?

      However, the USA and Japan did not expect along with them, and many others would think that the EBN would "get tired" so quickly, and even more so, they would add a receiver to all of them ... Otherwise, the Kuril Islands, the Arctic, and the Baltic collection would be. ..

      Incidentally, I would give the Baltic collection to the Germans - just not for nothing, but would change it. To the Amber Room. Not restored, but the one they stole. I think the question would be closed. And for EVERY claim to our territory or to anything else, we have something to answer in the same spirit.

      A total of 427 museums (of which 173 in Russia) were destroyed or plundered by the Nazis during the war. The catalog of losses includes 1 177 291 storage units (museum items, rare books and manuscripts, archival files). Large libraries have lost over 100 million copies of books. 44 897 archival collections were destroyed - 63% of the archive fund of Russia.
      Do not accept any references to "displaced values" from the Germans! “War cancels any treaties” and “Woe to the vanquished!” Also, mind you, not the Russians said ...
    7. Sober
      Sober 18 January 2016 11: 06 New
      0
      Quote: Hubun
      and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands

      The main thing here is not a territorial issue, but rapprochement with Russia. However, if he does not say this question, they will not understand him there. Politics!
    8. Vend
      Vend 18 January 2016 12: 02 New
      0
      Quote: Hubun
      and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands

      For Japan, there is only one solution to this issue - a free economic zone.
    9. guzik007
      guzik007 18 January 2016 12: 33 New
      +2
      and we will persistently show you cookies instead of the Kuril Islands
      -----------------------------------------
      I would like to believe, otherwise everything in my head revolves, as I straightened the border along the Amur River, the locals still spit.
    10. Juborg
      Juborg 18 January 2016 13: 10 New
      0
      I think that’s not why we began to invest money in the Kuril Islands on infrastructures and military camps in order to give them to my Japanese mom. In addition, we will not refuse to give up control of the only ice-free spill.
  2. papont64
    papont64 18 January 2016 09: 26 New
    +3
    A thin world is better than a good quarrel. But the islands can not be given. The rocks are the same.
  3. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 18 January 2016 09: 27 New
    17
    "I persistently want to resolve the territorial issue and advance negotiations on a peace treaty," Abe said.
    While there are temporary economic difficulties in Russia, I decided to try to push my own solution to the problem.
    There are spies with a strong body
    You are them at the door, they are at the window
    Say what's up with this thing
    We finished long ago ...
    1. Erg
      Erg 18 January 2016 09: 51 New
      +3
      If Vladimir Semyonovich were alive ... Now work for Him is not endless.
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 18 January 2016 10: 41 New
        +2
        Quote: Erg
        If Vladimir Semyonovich were alive ... Now work for Him is not endless.

        If Vladimir Semenovich had not died in the 80's, then with his keen sense of justice and conscience, he would have shot himself in the 90's. When the country for which he was so worried with all his heart was torn to pieces by the greedy and insatiable. Those that "came the country of Limonia, continuous Suitcases" ... No, with such a soul he would not have survived those times ...

        PS And Vladimir Semenych would personally strangle Dzhigurdu ... am
  4. Boos
    Boos 18 January 2016 09: 27 New
    26
    We have no territorial problems in the Far East, you can not come ...
    1. Svetlana
      Svetlana 18 January 2016 10: 03 New
      +2
      Quote: Boos
      We have no territorial problems in the Far East, you can not come ...

      We have no territorial problems in the Far East, and the absence of a peace treaty somehow does not soar.
  5. B.T.V.
    B.T.V. 18 January 2016 09: 29 New
    +7
    It is customary to compare human stubbornness with a donkey, but at least a donkey can be moved from a place, and what with these ?! !!
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 18 January 2016 10: 04 New
      0
      Quote: B.T.W.
      , but at least a donkey can be moved from a place, and what with these ?!

      Only pi ... shkoy, and very terrible in strength!
    2. fif21
      fif21 18 January 2016 10: 39 New
      0
      Quote: B.T.W.
      Human stubbornness is usually compared with a donkey
      The obsession with the return of the "northern territories" will lead Abe to the asylum wassat
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Amurets
      Amurets 18 January 2016 12: 02 New
      0
      Quote: B.T.W.
      It is customary to compare human stubbornness with a donkey, but at least a donkey can be moved from a place, and what with these ?! !!

      Another "incentive" -pointed stick, which poked a donkey in the ass.
  6. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 18 January 2016 09: 31 New
    15
    You give a peace treaty without territorial concessions !!!
    1. Stanislas
      Stanislas 18 January 2016 10: 12 New
      0
      Quote: VohaAhov
      peace treaty without territorial concessions
      Hopefully, Abe also counts on this. He probably understands that Russia (especially under Putin) will not give up the islands, but without Russia, Japan will never gain sovereignty and will be used by the United States to unleash large wars in the region.
  7. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 18 January 2016 09: 31 New
    +2
    The Japanese have not received stars for a long time, they want to refresh memory?
  8. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 18 January 2016 09: 31 New
    +8
    Well, he wants to settle it, well, please. Sign the peace treaty and go back to your Hokaido.
    1. Svetlana
      Svetlana 18 January 2016 10: 09 New
      +4
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Well, he wants to settle it, well, please. Sign the peace treaty and go back to your Hokaido.

      Not! The peace treaty concocted by the Americans in 1945 cannot be signed, this will mean automatic territorial concessions on our part. Stalin did not just refuse to sign it. The Japs need the signing of this peace treaty, but we don’t! If they agree to our version of the peace treaty, then we will sign it, and that one must be canceled! Otherwise, let them stick their peace treaty in their ass! I think it was something of that kind that Joseph Vissarionovich said to them then.
  9. Gray 43
    Gray 43 18 January 2016 09: 31 New
    +4
    The Japanese are cunning and patient - they will wait for the arrival of a more accommodating President of Russia than Putin
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 18 January 2016 09: 35 New
      +5
      Quote: Gray 43
      The Japanese are cunning and patient - they will wait for the arrival of a more accommodating President of Russia than Putin


      Then it was necessary to agree with "Mr. Gorbi" or "friend Boris".
      1. pioner
        pioner 18 January 2016 10: 25 New
        +2
        Look how much this territory which is not accommodating to China secretly gave away!
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 18 January 2016 10: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: Gray 43
      The Japanese are cunning and patient - they will wait for the arrival of a more accommodating President of Russia than Putin

      The Chinese say that if you sit on the river for a long time, then the corpse of your enemy will surely float past you. Here are the Japanese as the Chinese - they sit and wait. And with them the Americans. I once read - for the 2024 year, the mass media entertainers from the CIA have already developed so many exciting and massive events for Russia!

      They themselves could reach the 2024-th ...
  10. Brutal
    Brutal 18 January 2016 09: 36 New
    +9
    For seventy years they lived without a peace treaty, but then, suddenly they got plowed ?! What is he seeking ?! recourse (Kuril Islands - do not offer ...! Theme is closed!)
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 18 January 2016 09: 55 New
      0
      Quote: BRUTAL
      suddenly plowed up ?! What is he seeking ?!

      Maybe they themselves want to join Russia? lol
      1. Stanislas
        Stanislas 18 January 2016 10: 27 New
        0
        Quote: Sirocco
        Maybe they themselves want to join Russia?
        Why so soon? We can talk about joining the EAEU.
  11. edwardwar
    edwardwar 18 January 2016 09: 36 New
    +8
    not an inch of land
  12. Putinets
    Putinets 18 January 2016 09: 38 New
    +5
    Clinical case
  13. Denis DV
    Denis DV 18 January 2016 09: 38 New
    +7
    Gee, the Japs want to be part of the Russian Federation as a subject in the Far Eastern Federal District? laughing Buryats are present in Cossacks, why are the Japs worse? Let’s take the Japanese Slavs under the sauce of the slavish association of the Slavs? laughing laughing laughing
  14. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 18 January 2016 09: 39 New
    +5
    Forget about the islands and the problem will disappear.
  15. Pereira
    Pereira 18 January 2016 09: 39 New
    +3
    Conclude a contract who is against. Only without wet mriy of the Ukrin sample.
  16. Stinger
    Stinger 18 January 2016 09: 43 New
    +5
    What could be negotiations on a peace treaty with an American-occupied country? They will expel the invaders, then we can talk about something.
  17. Senior manager
    Senior manager 18 January 2016 09: 44 New
    +7
    Russia has no problems with territories, but Japan has. It turns out that Japan wants to solve its problem at the expense of Russia. Nothing personal - it is not profitable for Russia. Now, if Russia grows in the Japanese region, then of course, you need to think about it. But in general, the price of these islands is high - paid by the blood and lives of our soldiers, nothing to pay Japan, and also, as a vassal can make transactions on their own, nonsense.
  18. Humpty
    Humpty 18 January 2016 09: 44 New
    +2
    The Japanese, as usual, bring down the problems of their heads for health.
    1. Erg
      Erg 18 January 2016 09: 54 New
      +1
      Pug wants to conclude a non-aggression pact with an elephant ... laughing In my opinion, squinted megalomania.
  19. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 18 January 2016 09: 44 New
    +4
    Stubbornness - a sign of D. Urakov!
  20. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 18 January 2016 09: 45 New
    +3
    Even fully aware of the futility of trying to take over the “Northern Territories,” Mr. Shinzo tries to be very persistent in his attempts. This undoubtedly adds points to him in domestic politics. The image of a land collector and a bearer of the imperial Japanese spirit is liked by ordinary Japanese people. Well, let them rejoice for their prime minister. Surely he will fly to Moscow with a portfolio of investment offers for the Kuril Islands. It will be beneficial to us to trade and develop if this in no way violates the sovereignty of the Russian land.
  21. paxil
    paxil 18 January 2016 09: 47 New
    +3
    Then it was necessary to agree with "Mr. Gorbi" or "friend Boris". [/ Quote]

    So they tried at EBN, I almost drank then. Our special services were then able to disrupt this agreement.
    http://www.izh.kp.ru/daily/26473.7/3342621/
  22. chikenous59
    chikenous59 18 January 2016 09: 47 New
    +3
    I can not imagine how the Russian leadership can transfer the Kuril Islands to the Japanese in exchange for a peace treaty.
    How's that?
    To expel people from there from the acquired lands? Deprive housing, work?
    Collapse all military facilities?
    It will look like a betrayal by the state, not otherwise.
    Only a wimp can return the conquered territories back, that’s exactly what it will look like from the perspective of politics, accordingly, side effects also follow.
    They will talk with us even tougher, not putting anything.
  23. Nitarius
    Nitarius 18 January 2016 09: 47 New
    +2
    We are only FOR .... according to the world war! Our Kuril Islands and Basta. Or they’ll come up with a faq!
  24. Mixweb
    Mixweb 18 January 2016 09: 48 New
    +2
    ... I persistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty, ”Abe said.
    This phrase from the lips of the Japanese Prime Minister sounds like "Give the Islands." And the islands cannot be returned, even if they had no value and territorial waters did not depend on them. Because a precedent. That's all. Today you will give away unnecessary rock, tomorrow they will demand Sakhalin from you, the day after tomorrow Kamchatka and so on.
  25. Riv
    Riv 18 January 2016 09: 48 New
    +2
    Want, as they say, is not forbidden.
  26. Flinky
    Flinky 18 January 2016 09: 49 New
    +3
    What is the problem? Come on Hokkaido syudy - then we’ll definitely agree.
  27. Dreiko11
    Dreiko11 18 January 2016 09: 49 New
    +2
    he stubbornly wants to take our islands to himself))
  28. Alekseir162
    Alekseir162 18 January 2016 09: 49 New
    +2
    “I insistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty,” Abe said.

    And what is there to settle, a treaty must be concluded, but forget about the islands, about ... whether it is so about ... whether (well, in the sense of losing) and there is nothing to talk about.
  29. Amurets
    Amurets 18 January 2016 09: 50 New
    +1
    Let him crawl on 4 bones to Moscow and bow down every ten meters, pray for every kilometer that Russia will sign a peace treaty on Russian and non-Japanese terms, otherwise Russia will join the DPRK or a closer alliance with the PRC and Japan will remain on the "BOBS" .
  30. Oznob
    Oznob 18 January 2016 09: 51 New
    +2
    We have to wait another one, they've been waiting for 70 years, we’ll wait a bit. a moment is needed when Japan is more accommodating. Russia will not become more accommodating, since the Japanese didn’t succeed in the 90s, now it’s definitely not going to talk.
  31. ImPerts
    ImPerts 18 January 2016 09: 51 New
    +3
    Then I agree with Romanov
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Well, he wants to settle it, well, please. Sign the peace treaty and go back to your Hokaido.
    .
    The hare came to the forest for the Christmas tree, the bear says: "Take the birch and go away"
    The hare answers: "how come, now it's New Year!".
    The bear repeats its own.
    The hare shouts: "Give me even a pine!"
    The bear says: "On, pine. Then take a birch and ... (leave)."
  32. George 275
    George 275 18 January 2016 09: 52 New
    +3
    In Russia, enough land Japan does not need to sit at home.
  33. Barboskin
    Barboskin 18 January 2016 09: 52 New
    0
    A peace treaty can be concluded only after the complete elimination of the consequences of the war. Let them first get the withdrawal of the American occupation forces, and then they stutter about the peace treaty with us. wink
  34. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 18 January 2016 09: 53 New
    0
    Japan needs to forget about the islands, and the peace treaty is even today.
    Not for the peace treaty, give the whole thing to the Japanese, and they mislead their people, why create problems?
    They can’t keep track of their territory, if the lands are few, why did American bases go empty? Argue with the USA - let the base clean.
  35. veksha50
    veksha50 18 January 2016 09: 53 New
    0
    "" Japan has not yet concluded a peace treaty with Russia 70 years after the end of the war. I persistently want to resolve the territorial issue"...

    It’s a pity that our people did not take Okinawa at the time ...
    Well, let him first resolve the territorial problem with it, actually occupied by the United States ...
  36. geek2101
    geek2101 18 January 2016 09: 54 New
    0
    "Want is not harmful"
    "Harmful not wanting."
  37. BOB044
    BOB044 18 January 2016 09: 56 New
    +1
    From a dead donkey ears to you and not the Kuril Islands hi
  38. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 18 January 2016 10: 00 New
    +1
    I don’t know how the Japanese are with you, but everything is settled with the Kuril people in us)) we are already building to the full.
  39. Ros 56
    Ros 56 18 January 2016 10: 02 New
    +1
    And what is there to regulate, everything was regulated 70 years ago. If they want to sign a peace treaty on the current conditions, for God's sake, we are not opposed.
  40. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 18 January 2016 10: 03 New
    0
    Let them be aware that the Ukrainian leader, that the Japanese, is one verse from an old Soviet song. Why is it written and for what it was sung: When did I finish swimming far,
    That kissed granite on the marinas
    In my native Crimea and in Vladivostok, I
    Oh, on the Kuril Islands
    On our farthest islands. (c) 1953
  41. serg1970
    serg1970 18 January 2016 10: 04 New
    +1
    I read "CAPTURE" I want. Want on.
  42. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 18 January 2016 10: 05 New
    0
    Want is not harmful...
  43. Jozhkin Cat
    Jozhkin Cat 18 January 2016 10: 06 New
    0
    Russia has no territorial problems, so alas, there will be no peace treaty laughing
  44. Zomanus
    Zomanus 18 January 2016 10: 08 New
    +2
    I do not know. As for me, this is an attempt to get a bridgehead before a new war.
    They’ll get the island’s yapes and give them to the Americans under the base,
    for writing off part of the national debt. Or maybe the Americans promised them something
    more attractive, since the Japanese are so cut into the account of the contract.
    But the islands definitely need to be strengthened as soon as possible
    and as powerful as possible.
    1. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 18 January 2016 12: 45 New
      0
      Our straits, in one fell swoop to block our access to the operational space, they want. If they are allowed to give at least one island, our Pacific Fleet is worthless. I’m not talking about the Sea of ​​Okhotsk yet. Yes, and the Russian Far East as a whole. These minuscule points on the map have too high a price!
  45. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 January 2016 10: 09 New
    0
    Russia has no territorial problems with Japan. And I hope it will not. And then Japan may "not be." In the form in which it is now.
  46. novel68rus
    novel68rus 18 January 2016 10: 11 New
    0
    we don’t seem to have territorial problems for a long time .. especially in the Kuril Islands .. it’s their problems that always arise. soldier
  47. rom.macka2012
    rom.macka2012 18 January 2016 10: 15 New
    +1
    I must say, "We are not ready to negotiate because of sanctions," and suddenly they (sanctions) will someday be lifted, answer "Sorry, this territorial issue is contrary to our national security." laughing
  48. jovanni
    jovanni 18 January 2016 10: 15 New
    0
    Why are they trying to load us with their problems? We don’t have them ...
  49. SNG
    SNG 18 January 2016 10: 16 New
    +2
    In the spirit of European diplomacy, you can somehow do this:
    1. remove American military bases
    2. join the EEC
    and it will be visible there.
  50. vit
    vit 18 January 2016 10: 16 New
    +1
    “I insistently want to resolve the territorial issue and promote negotiations on a peace treaty,” Abe said.
    oh, yes the problem is solved simply! Really for 70 years nobody guessed ?! so that there are no border disputes between Japan and Russia, Japan must be included in Russia! elementary! drinks
    1. Platonich
      Platonich 18 January 2016 12: 39 New
      0
      What a self-confident samurai. Learned to yap at the Balts! After all, the most high-tech island can be drowned by the most primitive technology.
    2. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 18 January 2016 12: 52 New
      0
      This will not happen because of the difference in mentality, two wells with a charge are simpler and cheaper. And how is the song? I am a wave, a new wave, Below me will be the whole country Wait, soon forever, I will flood your cities.