Military Review

The International Criminal Court began to consider the appeal of the DPR on the facts of war crimes of the Ukrainian security forces

33
The chairman of the Donetsk People’s Republic Bar of Attorneys, Aleksey Zhigulin, reported that the International Criminal Court Board had begun to consider the first case materials related to the war crimes of the Ukrainian security forces in the Donbass. According to Zhigulin, the materials provide information about 21 of the fact of torture and torture of civilians and prisoners by the Ukrainian security forces, the shelling of residential areas.


The appeal to begin consideration of such materials from Donetsk to the International Criminal Court (ICC) was sent in the fall of 2015. A few days ago, a message from the prosecutor of the ICC came to Donetsk, and the message announced the beginning of the consideration of the materials of the appeal.

The International Criminal Court began to consider the appeal of the DPR on the facts of war crimes of the Ukrainian security forces


RIA News cites a fragment of the statement by Alexei Zhigulina:
The Prosecutor of the ICC has taken this material to study, he will now perform a number of actions under the 53 article of the Rome Statute. This is the first such response to the materials on the Kiev war crimes we sent. This means a real possibility of bringing the perpetrators to international criminal responsibility. We are guided by the principle of inevitability of punishment.


The head of the Council of Lawyers of the DPR also added that at least 700 appeals from citizens about the facts of war crimes of the Ukrainian security forces had been accepted by the European Court of Human Rights.

Frankly, it is difficult to count on the fact that the ICC and the ECHR will really make decisions in favor of Donetsk claimants, because these courts have long demonstrated their complete lack of independence and focus on making exclusively those decisions that benefit the West in one way or another.
Photos used:
AFP
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dezinto
    Dezinto 18 January 2016 06: 49 New
    16
    Yes damn let tyrnet revered. A lot of stories of people who have really been with these scumbags in one room.

    "St. George’s ribbon was tied in his hand, so that would infuriate them!"

    "Doused with gasoline and set on fire, then extinguished, then again doused and set on fire."

    ..... these nits can’t walk on the earth!
    1. Finches
      Finches 18 January 2016 07: 18 New
      +7
      The very fact of the beginning of the consideration of these cases by the International Court of Justice is a remarkable fact in itself! I think that Brussels could not do without the go-ahead, which means that it can be considered as another hairpin in the ass of Poroshenko, who begins to exert pressure on all issues, so that he would move faster in the right direction! And this means that the DPR and LPR are already federal lands for the EU, which, however, means, indeed, for the future of Ukraine that is not the most promising prospects ... Well, there has never been such a country and there was nothing to create!
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 18 January 2016 07: 33 New
        +4
        Frankly, it is difficult to count on the fact that the ICC and the ECHR will really make decisions in favor of Donetsk claimants, because these courts have long demonstrated their complete lack of independence and focus on making exclusively those decisions that benefit the West in one way or another.
        It's like that. But a stone drops a drop of water and therefore it is necessary to use any, even such an ephemeral, as ICC, opportunity to attract those responsible for the bloody crimes in the Donbass. Bandits and murderers should not walk on our land!
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 18 January 2016 07: 40 New
          +5
          Quote from the article
          it is difficult to expect that the ICC and the ECHR will indeed make decisions in favor of the Donetsk plaintiffs

          Anyway, war crimes lawsuits need to be filed, because history does not end today. They will not answer now - then they will answer. They’ll answer anyway. Such crimes are not forgiven.
          1. Svetlana
            Svetlana 18 January 2016 09: 32 New
            +2
            Quote: Tatiana
            All the same, lawsuits about war crimes need to be filed, because history does not end today. They will not answer now - then they will answer. They’ll answer anyway. Such crimes are not forgiven.

            It’s true that they won’t answer right now, but there’s no doubt that such a day that they will appear before the people's court will come. The only thing that is insulting to despair is that before that they still have time to destroy people. If, the Slavs, could finally find within themselves the strength and wisdom to finally unite, then they would dare all this fascist evil spirits governing world evil in a matter of days. When the Ukrainians, these ancients will see something from zombies! When it comes to them that they are destroying themselves, the Russians kill the Russians. The centuries-old dreams of our enemies come true. How can this be misunderstood?
            1. Lelek
              Lelek 18 January 2016 11: 52 New
              0
              Quote: Svetlana
              When Ukrainians, these ancients will see clearly


              It is unlikely in the next 5-10 years.
              But the story of a lady is not predictable, she can turn both in the front and in the ass.
              Here, for example, Canada is already closing itself off from Ukraine, and its “Svidomo” people have apparently got it:
              (cry.)
    2. Jan Krumins
      Jan Krumins 18 January 2016 07: 22 New
      +2
      Europe damn - "judge" will be. K.z.ly
      1. kodxnumx
        kodxnumx 18 January 2016 07: 53 New
        +4
        The situation has changed, as everyone understands now there is a chance of getting an adequate court position on this issue, as the position in the Russian world has strengthened!
  2. valokordin
    valokordin 18 January 2016 06: 50 New
    +6
    It is possible that the victims themselves will be found guilty of committing crimes. Long live the “most humane” Strasbourg court, all to the exit.
  3. avvg
    avvg 18 January 2016 06: 51 New
    +2
    Decisions will or will not be in favor of the Donetsk plaintiffs, but information about the crimes of the “dill fascists” at that time is gradually reaching European politicians.
  4. izya top
    izya top 18 January 2016 06: 51 New
    +4
    in vain skakely signed the Rome Statute ... although, the West will definitely smear the gutting and gutting, but the pastor may not be greeted with a hose am
  5. KOH
    KOH 18 January 2016 06: 56 New
    +2
    Yeah! These are judged ... No matter how Zakharchenko is accused of the genocide of the Bandera population ...))))))
  6. Signore Tomato
    Signore Tomato 18 January 2016 06: 59 New
    +1
    SchA at skaklah will begin a new shabash.
  7. inkass_98
    inkass_98 18 January 2016 07: 03 New
    +1
    The jurisdiction of the ICC in the DPR is somehow not very clear: Ruin did not sign the Rome Statute, EMNIP, and the DPR is not recognized by anyone. The prospects for considering cases are also completely unclear.
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 18 January 2016 07: 45 New
      +2
      Yes, there are difficulties, but the main thing is that the very fact of both appeal and acceptance for consideration together with any normal person will be wary of the actions of the Ukrainian fascist junta.
      For our part, we should use the term "ukrofashism" in as many comments as possible, this is very annoying for network users, causing an aversion to the Kiev junta ...
      1. Barboskin
        Barboskin 18 January 2016 08: 34 New
        +1
        No guys, everything is not as good as it seems. They will consider they will leave without consequences "due to lack of corpus delicti", the next time the junta will refer precisely to these decisions in the LDN dispute. They say stop complaining, there is a court decision that there was no violation of rights.
  8. starchina pv
    starchina pv 18 January 2016 07: 08 New
    -1
    another farce, talk and forget !!!
  9. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 18 January 2016 07: 10 New
    +1
    It’s even interesting how these two-faced courts will turn their backs on screaming facts!
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 January 2016 07: 18 New
    +2
    This means a real opportunity to bring perpetrators to international criminal responsibility. We are guided by the principle of inevitability of punishment.

    Actions of course are correct and necessary. But for some reason, the feeling that the ICC will begin to red tape this business does not leave.
    ... the inevitability of punishment

    While there is an opportunity, it is just necessary to shoot off odious combatants of the Armed Forces and national battalions. This will be exactly the inevitability of punishment.
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 18 January 2016 07: 57 New
      0
      And for this it is necessary to supply the militias with a sufficient number of large-caliber sniper rifles and small field radars for searching and detecting targets such as "Fara-1", "Monitor-M".
  11. sl22277
    sl22277 18 January 2016 07: 20 New
    +1
    When high-ranking criminals in Kiev will be responsible for their actions. Explain war crimes against their own citizens ?! Not only Dill, but also the "leaders of the Western world", namely Obama, Merkel, Hollande, Cameron. Until the above “figures” are brought to justice, no one can feel safe. Ukraine is just a “tool” in their hands.
  12. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 18 January 2016 07: 22 New
    0
    There is already a ready-State Department sentence, there is nothing innocent, it was Russian aggression, so Russia must pay Kiev compensation-a trillion euros.
  13. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 18 January 2016 07: 23 New
    +1
    I think this news is positive.
    One thing when it comes to interstate relations, you can always find facts of mutual violations. And these are specific crimes against specific individuals and, if the documents are legally well executed, the decision will be in favor of the applicant.
    The decision is made on the basis of legal facts proven in the document.
    For example, about the OSCE. They recorded shelling of the village of Nepal, but the OSCE reports nothing to indicate APU's guilt. For those who read reports, the phrase “shelling from the north-west” does not mean anything, because all the blame automatically falls on the militia. It is impossible to influence here until the mandate is changed. The result always depends on the paperwork.
    1. alex-cn
      alex-cn 18 January 2016 07: 47 New
      +1
      If we take into account that a delegation from France has recently visited Donbass by European standards, then perhaps someone from the middle level will be squeezed. For now, you should not count on more. They will reach the tops (if) only when they badly ruin Europe, which is unlikely
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 18 January 2016 11: 58 New
        0
        Quote: alex-cn
        For now, you should not count on more.


        Not in the Donbass, but in the "evil rabbit." An interesting thing is planned, but with a foggy end:
        (cry.)
  14. askort154
    askort154 18 January 2016 08: 43 New
    0
    I am distrusted, second from right, in the front row.
  15. HUMANOID
    HUMANOID 18 January 2016 08: 46 New
    +1
    Yes, they will pull the rubber for ten years. Here in the case of a Boeing, the perpetrators were immediately appointed, it remains to adjust the evidence. hi
  16. serkhan
    serkhan 18 January 2016 09: 04 New
    0
    Frankly, it’s difficult to expect that the ICC and the ECHR will really make decisions in favor of the Donetsk plaintiffs

    However, someone has already begun to stay awake wink
    “Given the experience of countries that have had similar situations, for example, Georgia, Croatia and other Balkan countries, recognition of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court will carry both potentially positive consequences and certain risks for Ukraine, in particular for the Ukrainian military who are involved in a military conflict ", - quotes Filatov newspaper Vzglyad.
  17. samoletil18
    samoletil18 18 January 2016 09: 27 New
    +1
    What verdict will we guess. But we hope for justice
  18. Hyppopotut
    Hyppopotut 18 January 2016 10: 12 New
    +1
    Oh, well, after 2 years we woke up! Just I do not believe in this court! It’s not to judge Milosevic, But Fushington’s proteges ... Here, as they say, you still have to look ...
  19. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 18 January 2016 11: 04 New
    0
    It is not clear that Ukraine did not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC (so far, although it made promises) and the UN mechanisms for transferring materials to the ICC with respect to countries that do not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC were also not involved.

    Some kind of scam, in order to somehow drag Russia into the number of defendants.
  20. gg.na
    gg.na 18 January 2016 11: 05 New
    +1
    First they will arrange a tyagomotin several years long am and then they will decide that they are either not guilty or a suspended sentence ... Which expired while the court was still sitting and that is then released in the courtroom! am And what's the use of such a court ?! And what will you show them after ??! Yet, by law, everything is done as it should! Or they will give real terms. 3 5 geeks will be planted, not very significant figures for juntics, so the loss is not great! yes !!! That’s the whole court! lol Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo am On another it is impossible!
  21. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 18 January 2016 11: 15 New
    +3
    Who would not say that, but this event should alert Bandera.
    The fact that this question was raised at all suggests that punishers walk along the edge of the abyss. And who would not come to power in the future in Ukraine, they (Bandera) will be extreme "scapegoats." But now they have no way back .A cornered rat is doubly more dangerous. Not in vain, after all, all crimes have been methodically documented.
    1. GRIG
      GRIG 18 January 2016 13: 27 New
      0
      Quote: Barkhan
      A cornered rat is doubly more dangerous.

      This is the task. Stymie. In all aspects.
      Cornered and not endowed with intelligence, they will begin to perform actions that, without special ceremonies and Western snot about democracy, will simply destroy them. And here it doesn’t even matter who does this, the junta itself or the DPR army, or maybe both together (dill love to surrender each other)
      Too many deaths and "domestic" genocide from ukrovoyak. Too.
      The earth should burn under their feet.
  22. Egoza
    Egoza 18 January 2016 11: 26 New
    0
    Well, the court admits the facts of bullying, torture, etc. Where are the accused? Who will they blame?
  23. Cananecat
    Cananecat 18 January 2016 11: 46 New
    0
    I think that the perpetrators of the crimes have already been appointed, from the chil those who just can not be removed. So it remains to wait for the verdict of the court and the appointment of Powder as someone extreme