The Pentagon: the new high-speed ships of the US Navy were vulnerable to high waves

108
High-speed ships that the US Navy ordered from Austal USA cannot withstand the oncoming impacts of high waves, reports RIA News a statement by the head of the Pentagon's operational verification department, Michael Gilmore, published on the Bloomberg website.



“Expeditionary Fast Transport (EPF) Expeditionary Catamaran ships are designed to carry approximately 545 tons of cargo and 312 personnel to a distance of thousands of kilometers to 2,2 at speeds up to 80 kilometers per hour. They were deployed in Africa and the Middle East, as well as in Singapore. The Navy bought ten ships of this type, each of which costs about 217 million dollars ", - explains Bloomberg.

Five of them are already in operation, and 5 is still under construction.

“When building ships, we had to compromise on the design of the bow, apparently to reduce weight,” Gilmore writes in a letter to the US Congress. “As a result, many ships began to suffer damage to the aluminum hull due to a collision with the waves.”

"However, even with the strengthening of the bow, it can be damaged by a high wave," he said.

According to Gilmore, EPF should not go into the sea during high seas or "walk at low speeds."

The repair of the first ship, received in 2012 g and tested in a rough sea, was spent $ 511 thousand. Repair the next three cost more - more than a million for each ship. The fifth EPF is currently awaiting repair.

Electric generators were also unreliable. “In some cases, their work time was just 208 hours instead of the promised 8369,” Bloomberg notes.

The Pentagon: the new high-speed ships of the US Navy were vulnerable to high waves
  • US Navy / bloomberg.com / europe
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    17 January 2016 11: 05
    EPFs should not go to sea during heavy seas or “walk at low speeds”

    Why are they needed then? Pass in the national economy - let the tourists ride. Capacity is just right.
    1. +9
      17 January 2016 11: 11
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      Why are they needed then? Pass on to the national economy - let the tourists ride. Capacity just right

      545 tons of cargo and 312 personnel

      Baggage and tourists laughing
      1. +5
        17 January 2016 12: 12
        ships began to get damaged aluminum hull


        But this is interesting. Aluminum cladding in sea water is a serious task. How do they solve it? And the boat itself is not bad - in certain areas it is much preferable to hovercraft or vehicle ekranoplanes - it’s simpler, cheaper, and it performs the main tasks.
        1. +2
          17 January 2016 15: 57
          Quote: dauria
          ... much preferable to hovercraft ...

          Yeah, especially when landing on an unequipped coast.
        2. +4
          17 January 2016 17: 31
          About the same as simple ships with a steel hull: coatings and protectors against electrochemical corrosion. The USSR has experience in building ships with aluminum hulls, and a successful one: "Rockets" on hydrofoils, small-capacity boats, TsAGI torpedo boats.
        3. +2
          17 January 2016 18: 53
          Quote: dauria
          But this is interesting. Aluminum cladding in sea water is a serious task. How do they solve it?

          Repair, repair, repair ... smile I'm not an expert, but it seems like a metal section with a higher chemical activity is being introduced than aluminum, which corrodes instead
          Quote: dauria
          And the boat itself is not bad - in certain areas it is much preferable to hovercraft

          Do not compare them - completely different ships with completely different tasks. This is more of a BDK, but not at all like the Bison. But I agree that the boat itself as a BDK is very good, the catamaran scheme is mainly interesting ...
          Quote: dauria
          WIG Transport

          Interestingly, if you can see an example of a transport ekranoplan, I have not heard of such ... if you are talking about the A-90 "Eaglet" then this is again a special type of vehicle and comparing it with a large landing craft is the same as comparing a large landing craft with a submarine hi
      2. +1
        17 January 2016 20: 32
        Not luggage and tourists, but a battalion with equipment. and even 80 km h in quiet water at such a distance - not bad at all. We have no analogues. the most similar - landing ships on an air cushion or ekranopodana, but this topic is killed. So do not gloat.
        1. 0
          18 January 2016 03: 03
          Marlin

          Not bad. 80 km / h 2200 km one way. Let 35 hours move. Che weather forecast will not get for 45 hours, so as not to get into the waves?

          Moreover, the very problem of these waves is in doubt.

          Yes of course. If Bradley burns, then the ships are drowning.

          What does this series of information press me on the brain ..
    2. +4
      17 January 2016 11: 13
      According to Gilmore, EPF should not go to sea during intense excitement or "walking at low speeds."

      Prescription to captain EPF: before going to sea, take a potent sedative! laughing
      1. PPD
        +6
        17 January 2016 11: 23
        A powerful entertainment is even better!
        1. +1
          17 January 2016 11: 47
          Quote: PPD
          A powerful entertainment is even better!


          Then it’s not 80, but 180 trample! :)
      2. cap
        0
        17 January 2016 23: 27
        catamarancatamaran
        Quote: SRC P-15
        According to Gilmore, EPF should not go to sea during intense excitement or "walking at low speeds."

        Prescription to captain EPF: before going to sea, take a potent sedative! laughing


        You need to start with the basics of design wassat
    3. +6
      17 January 2016 11: 14
      This is what happens when speed is a priority. Well, nothing, in the lakes (and even not in everyone), there will be such a high-speed catamaran for tourists for $ 217 million.
    4. +14
      17 January 2016 11: 19
      And it’s they who haven’t hit the ice yet ,,,, laughing And soon with another prodigy on the letter Z, reports of bugs will be showered.
      This is what I like about the Yankees, along with suitable things, they do the newest, most advanced and most expensive, but at the same time not flying, not shooting and not seaworthy devices.
      1. +5
        17 January 2016 11: 51
        Quote: lelikas
        This is what I like about the Yankees, along with suitable things, they do the newest, most advanced and most expensive, but at the same time not flying, not shooting and not seaworthy devices.


        But the Chinese are very happy :) They just need to calmly wait and see what the Americans built normally fly, shoot and go, and then copy it. What a cost savings!
      2. -7
        17 January 2016 11: 55
        Quote: lelikas
        that they still didn’t fall into the ice ,,,,

        And they never get

        There is no ice in the Atlantic, nor in the Indian, nor in the Pacific Ocean
        1. +7
          17 January 2016 12: 06
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          There is no ice in the Atlantic, nor in the Indian, nor in the Pacific Ocean


          Where did the Titanic sink? belay
          1. -5
            17 January 2016 12: 14
            Quote: Aleksander
            Where did the Titanic sink?

            is it jammed with ice? belay
            1. +6
              17 January 2016 13: 55
              And from what then "Icebergs" were made? belay
              1. 0
                17 January 2016 17: 37
                It is urgent to produce non-expensive and numerous non-melting icebergs for warm seas. It is desirable to break the surface configuration using the stealth technology!
        2. 0
          17 January 2016 12: 22
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          And they never get

          They won’t get into the ice, but they won’t shy away from any debris floating on the surface. Yes, and at that speed!
          1. jjj
            +2
            17 January 2016 12: 28
            Quote: Hedgehog
            They won’t get into the ice, but they won’t shy away from any debris floating on the surface. Yes, and at that speed!

            Palm trunk across course as anti-ship weapon of the Papuans
          2. -1
            17 January 2016 13: 26
            but they will not shy away from any debris floating on the surface. Yes, and at that speed!


            Do you know how many logs stand upright on the Volga even on the fairway? (I ask, like an old fisherman) smile However, "Rockets" and "Meteora" have been running for more than a dozen years, and it is more difficult for them. Is it really much worse at sea with garbage? belay
            1. +5
              17 January 2016 14: 50
              Quote: dauria
              Is everything much worse in the sea with garbage?

              It depends. However, we are talking about aluminum hulls with a carrying capacity of up to 1,5 thousand tons.
              Then one citizen tried to compare the corvette and the aircraft carrier and their air defense armament. DO NOT be like him.
        3. +2
          17 January 2016 12: 26
          Then there are containers and backs of whales come across, with which often laughing
        4. +4
          17 January 2016 13: 22
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Quote: lelikas
          that they still didn’t fall into the ice ,,,,

          And they never get

          There is no ice in the Atlantic, nor in the Indian, nor in the Pacific Ocean
          belay request A map and a geography textbook to help you, well, in extreme cases, Wikipedia. hi
        5. +3
          17 January 2016 13: 29
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Quote: lelikas
          that they still didn’t fall into the ice ,,,,

          And they never get

          There is no ice in the Atlantic, nor in the Indian, nor in the Pacific Ocean

          Ice is available in the northern and southern Pacific and Atlantic oceans, as well as in the southern Indian Ocean (Antarctic coast).
      3. 0
        17 January 2016 22: 19
        Quote: lelikas
        with another prodigy on the letter Z bug reports
        It’s interesting to know - what is this child prodigy's lateral roll resistance
    5. +3
      17 January 2016 12: 12
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      EPFs should not go to sea during heavy seas or “walk at low speeds”

      Why are they needed then? Pass in the national economy - let the tourists ride. Capacity is just right.

      Is it better to get refugees from Geyropa to the USA, otherwise they made porridge, headed by mattresses, and disentangle Europe alone?
    6. -7
      17 January 2016 12: 50
      Only he who does nothing at all is not mistaken. They will finish it and they will already laugh.
    7. +2
      17 January 2016 14: 36
      Judging by their vulnerability to sea waves, they can ride tourists only in the pool hi
    8. +4
      17 January 2016 15: 50
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      Why are they needed then? Pass in the national economy - let the tourists ride. Capacity is just right.

      .. To transfer Arab "refugees" to Europe .. laughing .. ordinary landing platform based on a catamaran port-to-port .. 80 km / h = 40 US if we speak in the maritime language .. IPC pr. 1124 is in full swing 36-38 usd. .. MRK pr. 1234 the same 35-36 usd. .. and these are projects of the 60-70s .. besides, even the presence of a gangway in the aft part of this pepelatsa does not guarantee the possibility of disembarking on an unfitted coast .. unlike the same Bison, which has a full speed of 65 usd. (120 km / h) and capable of overcoming a wall with a height of 1,6 m. .. and, also armed with a 140-mm MLRS "Fire": 2x22 PU MS-227 .. the same "Grad" overheated .. hi
  2. +1
    17 January 2016 11: 07
    Nevermind, a fish feeder for 217 million ...
  3. +5
    17 January 2016 11: 08
    According to Gilmore, EPF should not go into the sea during high seas or "walk at low speeds."

    And even better - do not get out of the base at all. You look, and the world would be calmer ...
    1. 0
      17 January 2016 11: 55
      In the probable place of passage of such "swallows", let empty metal drums from under the fuel go through the water. Meeting with each barrel for an American will be, if not fatal, then extremely unpleasant and sooo expensive to repair.
  4. +2
    17 January 2016 11: 09
    Suddenly! Previously, they certainly did not know this!
    As the saying goes, "it never happened, and here it is again."
  5. CPC
    +7
    17 January 2016 11: 13
    Pass them to Ukraine
    1. +7
      17 January 2016 11: 20
      Quote: MKP
      Pass them to Ukraine

      No, it’s impossible - they will immediately block the Crimea with them and will block until the catamaran in the cake makes waves ....
    2. +9
      17 January 2016 11: 28
      Quote: MKP
      Pass them to Ukraine

      Will Ukraine have enough money to support them? And what will it do with them? hi
      1. 0
        17 January 2016 13: 50
        Quote: vlad66
        Quote: MKP
        Pass them to Ukraine

        Will Ukraine have enough money to support them? And what will it do with them? hi

        no, they won’t give it away, but they can simply drive a couple of frigates of the Oliver Hazard Perry type ... they have two or three of them in reserve, five of them are actively seeking and up to ten to fifteen of them sucks ...
    3. +4
      17 January 2016 11: 32
      In your opinion, to convey, it means to give, so I understand? No, mattress covers are so petty that even written off, for example, the same used ones. "Hummers" were not given to Ukraine either, but they put this country 404 on a credit needle .. Now the grandchildren will have to give money, and even with interest!
      1. +9
        17 January 2016 11: 40
        Quote: Igor F.
        Now to give money, and even with interest, will have grandchildren!

        Igor, you’ve made a mistake, not to the grandchildren, but to the great-grandchildren, and if this goes on, the great-great-grandchildren will still pay. hi
  6. +2
    17 January 2016 11: 15
    Here it is worth sinning for a stupid technical task. These are not ekranoplans. As before the Second World War, they demanded from long-range heavy 4 - motor bombers the ability to bomb from a dive during critical overloads.
  7. +2
    17 January 2016 11: 15
    However, even when the nose is strengthened, it can be damaged by a high wave, ”he said.

    Are there such ships that a high wave cannot damage?



    Destruction in the storm of the ocean linear container ship MOL Comfort (Indian Ocean, 2013 year)
    _______________________
    On November 17, the leader of Baku and the destroyer Destructive were brought in to strengthen the escort of the next allied convoy QP-15. In the conditions of a fierce storm, which reached hurricane force by the morning of November 20 (11 wind score), with frequent snowy charges and zero visibility, the convoy and guard ships lost sight of each other, after which the convoy dispersed.

    The impact of a nine-point wave on the Baku leader caused the deck to bend and cracks appear in it, the sunroofs and covers of the ventilation shafts of boiler rooms were deformed, the hull was broken - all rooms with a new tip on the upper deck according to 25 sp. turned out to be flooded, water flowed through the ventilation shafts to the 2 and 3 boiler rooms, only the main boiler No. 1 remained in operation. The ship’s condition turned out to be critical: the leader took over 1 00 t of sea water, the trim on the nose was increasing, the roll reached 40 °. The crew led a desperate struggle for the survivability of the ship.

    - World War II Chronicle


    Flight deck of the aircraft carrier "Hornet" after a typhoon, 1945

    Five of them are already in operation, and 5 is still under construction ... They were deployed in Africa and the Middle East, as well as in Singapore.

    A series of ships operated around the world for several years
    so what's the problem?
    1. +3
      17 January 2016 11: 39
      SWEET_SIXTEEN
      Are there such ships that a high wave cannot damage?

      There is. The submarine is called.
      In general, after reading the article, the song "Eaglet" sounded in my head.
      PySy. I'm talking about ekranoplan.
      1. -5
        17 January 2016 12: 04
        Quote: sabakina
        after reading the article, the song "Eaglet" sounded in my head.
        PySy. I'm talking about ekranoplan.

        Put in a storm in a design designed according to aviation standards, with a lower margin of safety than a classic ship? Encountering a wave at a speed of 150 nodes?

        Densities of water and air vary by 800 times. At these speeds, water becomes harder than concrete walls.
        1. +1
          17 January 2016 12: 27
          SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Densities of water and air vary by 800 times. At these speeds, water becomes harder than concrete walls.

          This is not a ship or a plane ....
          1. -10
            17 January 2016 12: 29
            Quote: sabakina
            This is not a ship or a plane ....

            Of course this is not a ship, the payload is 1% of the payload of a conventional linear container ship

            This is an aircraft with deteriorated performance characteristics.
            1. +1
              17 January 2016 12: 34
              Excuse me, did you watch the video well?
              1. -6
                17 January 2016 12: 43
                Quote: sabakina
                Excuse me, did you watch the video well?

                Marine technology, due to its safety margin, cannot fly
                For the same reason, an airplane cannot walk on the waves.

                And ECP a priori can not be compared with a ship, due to the insignificant carrying capacity
                1. +3
                  17 January 2016 13: 07
                  SWEET_SIXTEEN
                  Expeditionary Fast Transport (EPF)

                  And ECP a priori can not be compared with a ship, due to the insignificant carrying capacity

                  and this is your catamaran cargo ship or what? belay
                  1. 0
                    17 January 2016 17: 00
                    Quote: sabakina
                    and this is your catamaran cargo ship or what?

                    Sorry, but you're not arguing about that. Initially, for "Lunya" seaworthiness is limited to 6-5 points. It is impossible to compare what is impossible to compare, although ekranoplans, according to Vicki, are ships. An ekranoplan with a high wave will never be encountered by default.
      2. +3
        17 January 2016 13: 27
        Quote: sabakina
        In general, after reading the article, the song "Eaglet" sounded in my head.
        PySy. I'm talking about ekranoplan.

        Then Lun would do well to remember. wink We are in full swing at work on the construction of ekranoplanes. The truth is not so large as Lun and Eaglet. But the beginning has been made. You can not give leadership in this matter.
        1. +4
          17 January 2016 13: 40
          For NEXUS
          Hello Andrey!
          From NN I have a lot of pleasant impressions, but for me to the grave Mr. Gorky will be! (sorry, but "soviet education").
          I hope the drawings and stocks of "Lunya" are still alive ...
          Makhnu however ... For you, special forces, airborne and all of us! drinks
          1. +2
            17 January 2016 15: 32
            Quote: sabakina
            Hello Andrey!

            I greet you too. hi To my shame, I do not know your name.
            Quote: sabakina
            From NN I have a lot of pleasant impressions, but for me to the grave Mr. Gorky will be! (sorry, but "soviet education").

            The city is wonderful. And the people here are nice. wink
            Quote: sabakina
            I hope the drawings and stocks of "Lunya" are still alive ...

            They’re alive, they’re alive ... but only while they have gained the lost experience. And it will be seen there. There is a rumor that they will soon build a large ekranoplane, with a carrying capacity of 800 tons, but so far these are only rumors. We'll see.
            Best regards hi
    2. +2
      17 January 2016 12: 07
      Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
      so what's the problem?

      Cap evidence hints -
      As a result, many ships began to receive damage to the aluminum hull due to a collision with the waves. "
      “However, even when the bow is strengthened, it can be damaged by a high wave.” EPFs should not go to sea during heavy waves or “walk at low speeds.”
      The repair of the first ship, received in 2012 g and tested in a rough sea, was spent $ 511 thousand. Repair the next three cost more - more than a million for each ship. The fifth EPF is currently awaiting repair.


      And these are not self-propelled self-propelled guns, but high-tech ships, calculated on a computer. Of course, in any ship, during the most severe storm, it can tear something, but here it is not the strongest in the whole series,
      1. -7
        17 January 2016 12: 12
        Quote: lelikas
        As a result, many ships began to receive damage to the aluminum hull due to a collision with the waves. "

        Like all other ships caught in the storm
        Quote: lelikas
        $ 511 thousand was spent. Repairing the next three was already more expensive - more than a million for each ship.

        0,5 million with the cost of the ship 217 million
        Cosmetic repairs, that's what it is

        Hurray patriots once again made an elephant out of a fly
        1. +5
          17 January 2016 12: 32
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Hurray patriots once again made an elephant out of a fly

          Bloomberg? Does the sun bake your head? laughing
          1. -9
            17 January 2016 12: 47
            Quote: user1212
            Bloomberg?

            Yes, at least someone

            0,5 million with the cost of the ship 217 million
            great problem
            1. +2
              17 January 2016 18: 02
              Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
              0,5 million with the cost of the ship 217 million
              great problem

              Is an article about the cost of repairs? The author raises the question of how a series of ships that do not have sufficient seaworthiness, was tested and was included in the fleet.
    3. 0
      17 January 2016 12: 31
      And at the EM "Crushing" then the stern was completely torn off and the ship died with 17 sailors.
    4. +2
      17 January 2016 13: 26
      You would have brought the chronicle of the First World War. Here we are talking about the latest military developments that in fact did not stand the simplest tests
  8. +2
    17 January 2016 11: 15
    give it to Russia, we will repair for your money, the main thing is that the fire does not happen ...
  9. +4
    17 January 2016 11: 16
    Jokes are bad with the sea.
    Remember the "big waves" and the fate of the ferry "Estonia".
    And it is not yet known how the DDG-1000 Zumvolt will behave (in fact) on the high wave of Woodnerwafl. Reverse camber of the tank (bow end) will make it dive and not cut "high waves". So you can cover yourself with a wave with the superstructure ...
    1. -6
      17 January 2016 11: 24
      Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
      So you can cover the wave with a superstructure ...

      And what's the problem
      he has no combat posts and any equipment on the upper deck

      And, by the way, Zamvolta board height is twice as high as that of a conventional destroyer
      1. +4
        17 January 2016 11: 38
        with such a nose, the king is prone to diving, will dive, the wave will reach the superstructure not weakened, the blow will be not very weak. Will it be useful for antennas, and indeed the design of the ship?
        1. -5
          17 January 2016 11: 57
          Quote: Yozhkin Cat
          the blow will not be very weak. It will be useful for antennas.

          At the height of an 16-story building?

          usually people underestimate the size of corbles
          1. +9
            17 January 2016 12: 02
            usually people underestimate the greatness and power of the wave.
            1. -3
              17 January 2016 12: 09
              Quote: Yozhkin Cat
              usually people underestimate the greatness and power of the wave

              You know such an interesting fact: on cruise ships (with their sizes), pitching is not felt
              1. +5
                17 January 2016 12: 37
                With a good ocean wave and "cruisers" chatter God forbid! Even dampers with a stabilization system do not help!
                And people vomit further than they see ... personal observation.
                1. -5
                  17 January 2016 12: 47
                  Quote: kepmor
                  With a good ocean wave and "cruisers" chatter God forbid!

                  100 000 tons
                  what should be the wave
                  1. +3
                    17 January 2016 13: 58
                    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                    Quote: kepmor
                    With a good ocean wave and "cruisers" chatter God forbid!

                    100 000 tons
                    what should be the wave

                    probably like that ...
                  2. +2
                    17 January 2016 19: 21
                    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                    100 000 tons

                    Oleg! We are now talking about Zumwalt with its 14,5Kt displacement, and not about "Queen Elizabeth" we are talking about. Feel the difference, plz!
              2. +3
                17 January 2016 19: 17
                Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                You know such an interesting fact: on cruise ships (with their sizes), pitching is not felt

                Oleg, and you know the fact that in the first combat service in 1977 on the aircraft carrier "Kiev" in the stormy Barents Sea a wave raised the hatches of the bow mooring room. The force of the wave impact reached 300 tons. Yes Metal rails were cut off, like a cow licked its tongue ... By the way, 41 Kt of the displacement twisted eight (pitching amplitude) no worse than ice skaters. And you, damn it, about the cruise ships on the water surface! lol
          2. +2
            17 January 2016 12: 22
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN

            usually people underestimate the size of corbles

            And what was underestimated in the container ship a couple of posts above? laughing
            1. -3
              17 January 2016 12: 27
              Quote: lelikas
              And what was underestimated in the container ship a couple of posts above?

              Banal technical miscalculation + overload, aggravated by improper cargo placement

              Are there many more such cases? Amid volumes of trans-Kenken traffic (Shanghai port handles 35 million containers per year, Singapore - 31)
      2. +2
        17 January 2016 14: 07
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        And, by the way, Zamvolta board height is twice as high as that of a conventional destroyer

        almost more ...


      3. +3
        17 January 2016 19: 07
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        And what's the problem

        Hello Oleg! Glad to hear from you.
        Essentially. At Zumwalt in the superstructure there are air intake shafts for the operation of the power plant. Now imagine that for 20-30 seconds (or maybe more?) They are automatically slammed and compressors take air from the compartments of the ship.
        Have you ever had such a blow to your ears? belay No ... Well, then you are more fortunate than the submariners of the DPS, going in fresh weather under the RDP. laughing
        1. +1
          17 January 2016 19: 15
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          In essence. At Zumwalt in the superstructure there are air intake shafts for the operation of the power plant

          Good evening, Alexander ... and what do we have about the Leaders? There is little information ... do they really run around with the mock-ups at exhibitions?
    2. +3
      17 January 2016 12: 00
      Quote: BoA KAA
      So you can cover the wave with a superstructure ...


      And no one will even be upset if this wunderwolf does not surface. Ours, by definition, the rest of the world from great "love" for America, and the Americans themselves will receive insurance and, as a result, deep moral satisfaction.
      1. +1
        17 January 2016 19: 37
        Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
        And nobody will even be upset

        Misha, sailors are not only superstitious, but also sacredly honor marine traditions ...
        The death of the ship (not in battle, of course!) Is a national tragedy for the flag country ... Sincere feelings, sympathy and condolences to the people of the sea, regardless of their nationality ...
        It just so happened: those who rejoice in the grief of others will surely bring trouble to themselves and the crew. Therefore, courageous people go to sea, knowing the price for themselves and their work. They are valued both at sea and on shore.
        Apparently that's why the bell rings in Lloyd’s office, on ships that didn’t return home ... and their crews.
        IMHO.
  10. Hey
    +1
    17 January 2016 11: 18
    And if you move them a little to the north where can you meet an ice floe? How will they feel?
  11. 0
    17 January 2016 11: 23
    brake parachutes and a couple of anchors for an emergency stop in front of the wave .. current cargo and people need to be fixed properly .. there are pillows there ...
  12. 0
    17 January 2016 11: 25
    Or maybe you just didn’t need to build a ship from aluminum, and having sacrificed weight to speed to use steel, they create fantastic projects, and marvel at the modest results.
  13. +4
    17 January 2016 11: 27
    Do they do research and development at all?
    At these speeds, not all steel will behave well. request
    well dumb
    1. 0
      17 January 2016 11: 42
      Maximum speed is needed when breaking through the curtain of fire on the way to the target, it's minutes. Cruising speed is quite comfortable and economical.
  14. +3
    17 January 2016 11: 28
    Americans will always find the right solution, having tried all the rest first. Comrade Churchill. Nothing changed. It remains to envy the budget, allowing to conduct experiments on such a scale, look for new solutions and move forward. They do not have United Russia and their European and offshore children ...
    Wow, the backing track is flying .....
  15. +6
    17 January 2016 11: 31
    These are ships of a completely new class. Expeditionary Fast Transport
    Movement at a speed of 80 km / h for landing with equipment.
    It’s unlikely that landing operations will be scheduled for stormy weather,
    when ordinary ships will not be able to fully function.
    1. +2
      17 January 2016 12: 23
      Anti-ship missile, it’s all the same to her, with what speed the ship goes ...
      1. +3
        17 January 2016 14: 57
        The landing is covered by destroyers, other ships.
        They fight with the KR themselves, their launchers and enemy ships.
        And the landing ship should deliver as quickly as possible
        cargo to shore, not to fight.
    2. +1
      17 January 2016 13: 37
      Quote: voyaka uh

      It’s unlikely that landing operations will be scheduled for stormy weather,
      when ordinary ships will not be able to fully function.

      Was the Allied landing in Normandy carried out in absolutely calm weather?
    3. +1
      18 January 2016 00: 00
      Quote: voyaka uh
      These are ships of a completely new class. Expeditionary Fast Transport
      Movement at a speed of 80 km / h for landing with equipment.
      It’s unlikely that landing operations will be scheduled for stormy weather,
      when ordinary ships will not be able to fully function.

      Yeah. In some coastal state U, under the blows of the enemy’s forces, Yusov’s marins die, the command urgently asks for reinforcements, and it’s polite to them
      - sorry gays, our transport is afraid of waves and until the storm season ends, you hang on there .....
      - Then send the B-2 bombers!
      -Sorry gais, but they wash away the paint with rain - stealth - wait for the sunny weather!
      - ***! ***! ***! But we are marines! They made an awesome F-35 airplane! Send a couple of squadrons!
      -Sorry gais, but they can’t shoot, and it’s not safe for you there, and their chair breaks the pilot’s neck and some crap with tanks - but you stay there, we will send the Bundeswehr to help, with cuttings from mops instead of machine guns. laughing
  16. +2
    17 January 2016 11: 40
    For the quick transfer of troops over long distances, that's it. Such operations during a storm wave do not organize. There is a weather service for forecasting. Good boats then. They wouldn’t hurt us either.
  17. 0
    17 January 2016 11: 44
    Something incomprehensible in the Yankos. F-35 is some kind of initially unfinished, EPF with an initial error. It is clear that the landing will not take place in stormy weather. However, different things can happen during the war. But you can talk about F-35 as well, like, against the banana republics.
    1. 0
      17 January 2016 15: 01
      Americans are realists. They are not making the perfect technique,
      but pretty decent. And most importantly - in large quantities.
  18. -1
    17 January 2016 11: 48
    The fast ships that the US Navy ordered from Austal USA do not withstand high-frequency oncoming hits.


    Are they paper or cardboard ...

    What did the designers think, and especially those who conducted the tests, and took the ship into service ...
  19. +1
    17 January 2016 12: 11
    As a result, many ships began to receive damage to the aluminum hull due to a collision with the waves. "
    Zhiiv Maxim Maksimych Isaev! And it works efficiently laughing
  20. +2
    17 January 2016 12: 17
    Quote: voyaka uh
    It’s unlikely that landing operations will be scheduled for stormy weather,
    when ordinary ships will not be able to fully function.


    Logical.

    But the weather is sometimes unpredictable, and this is not a pleasure yacht (I wanted to go to sea and wanted to stay at the pier) ... Take into service a warship, knowing that it does not withstand high-frequency oncoming strikes, as it is illogical, to say the least.
    1. +5
      17 January 2016 16: 18
      He does not drown from high waves - only his nose gets
      damage and requires repair later.

      You know, "the rich also cry" smile if the landing ship managed in combat
      conditions on the high seas to land a battalion with tanks and infantry fighting vehicles
      (545 tons of cargo and 312 personnel),
      then, in my opinion, he has already fully paid for himself, even if after that
      fell apart into small slivers.
  21. +1
    17 January 2016 12: 21
    I remembered a quote from the film "Volga-Volga":

    "The steamer is good, only afraid of water"
  22. +1
    17 January 2016 12: 41
    they don’t have enough to see their designers and designers, so they are being designed by migrant designers from friendly countries, not forgetting about their “homeland.” The tail is a dark matter.
  23. 0
    17 January 2016 12: 42
    new US Navy high-speed ships are vulnerable to high waves


    Give me money! Give me money! laughing
  24. 0
    17 January 2016 12: 57
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Jokes are bad with the sea.
    Remember the "big waves" and the fate of the ferry "Estonia".
    And it is not yet known how the DDG-1000 Zumvolt will behave (in fact) on the high wave of Woodnerwafl. Reverse camber of the tank (bow end) will make it dive and not cut "high waves". So you can cover yourself with a wave with the superstructure ...


    And what is the advantage of a reverse tank (nasal tip)? I was surprised by a ship that resembled Greek galleys)
  25. +3
    17 January 2016 13: 38
    For some reason, I remembered the landing in Spain with stuck vehicles in the sand ... Even very cool equipment can run into the human factor ...
    And negate all the advantages laid down by designers ...
  26. +1
    17 January 2016 14: 54
    The real sea wave is not a computer simulator for you, I live on the Baltic coast. So in the autumn-spring season storms can be scary to watch how they beat against the ruins of our Libava coastal fortress! And I am silent about typhoons in the Indian and Pacific Ocean!
    1. +3
      17 January 2016 15: 50
      There is a term "seaworthiness" which limits the operation of a ship depending on the state of the sea. If the ships received damage due to movement at speed with a wave height that did not allow it, then the ship's commander's school, if everything is according to the instructions, then the designers or manufacturer's school. Well, then at high speeds it is better to walk with calmness ...
      1. +1
        17 January 2016 16: 16
        Quote: Mera Joota
        Well, at high speeds it’s better to walk with calm ...

        At high speeds it's better to fly wink
  27. 0
    17 January 2016 17: 17
    but maybe try to change the shape of the nasal bridge to a trihedral or diamond-shaped?
  28. 0
    17 January 2016 17: 51
    Such cases are very fuel saving! Here is the right decision. Two passenger catamarans with such hulls go to Vladivostok — one aluminum, and the second composite.
  29. 0
    17 January 2016 18: 38
    That's what it means - The defense industry is in private hands! For such money, Our defense industry would have done many times better and more!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"