Military Review

Who is financing the color revolutions in the post-Soviet space

61
Who is financing the color revolutions in the post-Soviet space



The victory of one state or group of states over another is achieved not only on the battlefield, but also economic, political, informational weapons. If the term “victory” and “weapon” is used, then it is appropriate to use the term “war”. And for any war, three things are needed: money, money, and again money. This is how Marshal Jan-Jacopo Trivoulzio (1448 – 1518) allegedly answered the question of Louis XII, what preparations are needed to conquer the Duchy of Milan.

The goal of the economic, political, information war unleashed against Russia is to change the state’s foreign policy through a change in the ruling elite through the implementation of the color revolution scenario. According to the Secretary of the Security Council of Russia, Nikolai Patrushev, taking into account the European and Asian-Pacific main directions of American economic expansion in the plans of the administration, the creation under its own auspices of free trade zones with the European Union and the APR countries. "At the same time, in Washington they cannot but realize that with the current approach of the United States to the solution of these tasks, a confrontation with Russia and China will be inevitable."

Nikolai Patrushev in one of his interviews said: “The US administration hopes that the anti-Russian measures taken will lead to a deterioration in the quality of life of the population, entail massive protests, and this will push Russian citizens to change the current leadership using color revolutions scenarios.

It is noteworthy that today, for the first time, Washington openly lays in its state budget expenditures on countering Russia. ”

Until recently, no government has officially recognized the financing of the opposition, protest movement and color revolutions in the neighboring or any other country. However, this does not mean that they are not interested in creating comfortable conditions for the implementation of their foreign policy and economic plans. In Eastern Europe and Central Asia, such objects of attention for the USA and the EU are the states that gained independence after the collapse of the USSR. Russia is of particular interest to the United States and the largest participants in foreign economic activity from Western Europe, for them Russia is not only a trading partner, but also a competitor at the same time. The attention of the West has also been awarded to Belarus, Georgia and Ukraine, for which the main goal is to “tear off” their economy and politics from Russia and the CIS as a whole.

AMERICAN BUDGET OF "DEMOCRATIZATION" OF RUSSIA


The primary and largest sources of financing the “democratization” of the states of the former USSR are the state budgets of the United States and Great Britain, the budget of the European Union and its member states.

In the US, funds are distributed among governmental and non-governmental non-profit organizations (NPOs) involved in organizing and financing opposition movements in the former USSR through executive agencies such as the US Department of State and International Development Agency (USAID). USAID's financial capabilities can be judged from the report prepared by the US Court of Auditors on the effectiveness of the Agency's 10 projects to help Russia, implemented in the 1990 – 1994 years. The report, published by 3 in August 1995, shows the amount of 64,6 million dollars. Note that this is only for 10 projects and only in Russia, and the USAID implements more than 1 thousands of projects all over the world.

In September 2012, the Russian Foreign Ministry officially notified the American side that USAID activities in the Russian Federation should be stopped from October 1 of the current year. The essence of Moscow’s claims to the organization 19 of September, 2012, was announced by the representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Alexander Lukashevich: “This decision was primarily due to the fact that the nature of the agency’s representatives in our country did not always meet the stated goals of promoting bilateral humanitarian cooperation. It is about trying to influence through the distribution of grants to political processes, including elections at various levels, and the institutions of civil society. AMP activity in the Russian regions, especially in the North Caucasus, raised serious questions, which we repeatedly warned our American colleagues. ”

Thus, USAID was forced to curtail its activities in Russia. But this does not mean that the US Department of State refused to finance the Russian opposition. “Although USAID’s physical presence in Russia has come to an end, we are still committed to supporting democracy, human rights, and developing a healthy civil society in Russia. We seek to continue cooperation with Russian non-governmental organizations, ”said Victoria Nuland, a spokeswoman for the US Department of State.

At the briefing, she called the total cost. “Over the past 20 years of work in Russia, USAID has provided about 2,7 billion dollars for programs of various kinds,” said Nuland.

The largest recipient of budget funds through USAID is the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). Its annual budget is constantly growing. In May, the Senate Appropriations Committee recommended that Congress in the 2012 fiscal year allocate even more funds to the NED under the head of the Department of Foreign Operations and Relevant Programs — 2013 million dollars, of which 236 million dollars “should be allocated in the traditional and in the usual way, as in previous financial years, to include the main institutions. ”

NED is also funded from private foundations such as the Smith Richardson Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Lind and Harry Bradley Foundation. For example, in the period from 1987 to 2005, these organizations transferred about $ 2 million to the National Endowment for Democracy. The sources of funding for these funds, in turn, are deductions from the income of inclusive companies from the performance of government contracts.

As follows from the USAID materials, about half of the NED budget spends on the activities of four associated organizations:

1) American Center for International Labor Solidarity (ACILS), better known as Solidarity Center of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Unions (AFL-CIO);

2) Center for International Private Enterprise (Center for International Private Enterprise CIPE);

3) International Republican Institute (IRI);

4) National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - NDIFIA, also NDI).


The price of freedom is 5 billion dollars. Photo author

All of them have their offices in Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova and Ukraine. Additionally, in addition to these four countries, CIPE has offices in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. IRI has offices in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. Each of the offices or representative offices is a distribution point between the NGOs of the country in which it operates.

In 2001, Alexander Domrin, at that time a visiting professor at the Law School of the University of Iowa, in Dipkurier (supplement to the Nezavisimaya Gazeta) published an article “Sad история American Assistance to Moscow, ”in which he cited data from the report of the General Control Office of the US Congress that during the 1992 – 1997 period, the USAID budget in the framework of financing the IRI and NDI programs sent 17,4 million to provide assistance to the reformist political parties in strengthening their organizational structures and strengthening their role in elections "in Russia.

Each year, NED provides financial assistance to hundreds of non-governmental organizations around the world. NED, as noted on its website, is awaiting applications from organizations operating in countries with different systems, including the newly proclaimed democracy, semi-authoritarian regime, repressive system, and countries switching to democratic rails. In the 2010 year, the National Fund of various political and scientific projects in Russia amounted to about 2,8 million, and in the 2012 year - 3 million.

The recipients of this money include independent organizations that monitor election irregularities, and the Russian office of the American National Democratic Institute (NDI), which is closely associated with the NED.

The NDI budget receives contributions from governments of more than 20 states, numerous foreign foundations, corporations and organizations. As of the second half of October 2015, the budget of the NDI, according to the data published by him, received 7,7 million euros. Among donors are the well-known in Russia energy company Chevron Corporation, Facebook, Herbalife, Coca-Cola Company, Visa Inc. etc. Without exaggeration, we can say that when a person buys a Herbalife or Coca-Cola, carries out a transaction with his Visa bank card - he participates in financing the protest movement in Russia.

In 2012, the NDI office in Russia was closed. However, the institute continued to work with partner organizations that are interested in international experience and practices of monitoring the political process, strengthening civil and political organizations and supporting initiatives to increase civic participation in socio-political processes at the regional level.

The closure of the NDI office in Moscow had little effect on the activities of NED in Russia. Using the opportunities of Russian-controlled commercial and non-profit organizations, NED participated in recognizing the illegitimate results of election campaigns, organizing political actions to influence decisions made by authorities, and discredit service in the Russian Armed Forces.

In 2013 – 2014, NED, according to the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, provided Russian commercial and non-profit organizations with financial assistance in the amount of about $ 5,2 million. Considering the general direction of the foundation’s activities, the prosecutor’s office concluded that NED poses a threat to the fundamentals of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation, defense and security of the state. By order of the Ministry of Justice of Russia No. 1076-p of July 29 2015, the National Endowment for Democracy was included in the list of foreign and international non-governmental organizations whose activities were considered undesirable in the territory of the Russian Federation.

As of 26 in November of 2015, 87 NCOs were listed in the register of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation as a foreign agent, that is, receiving financial and material resources from foreign sources.

On the websites of the US embassies in Ashgabat, Bishkek, Dushanbe, Kiev, Minsk and other capitals of the states formed in the post-Soviet space, grants in 30 thousand dollars are offered to opposition public organizations for conducting protest work in their countries.

Foreign state organizations that participate in the information support of protest movements in the countries of the former USSR also receive budget financing. Among them - the Board of Governors of the United States (Broadcasting Board of Governors - BBG). Through this independent federal agency, the US government controls the international media - Voice of America, Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Broadcast Management in Cuba, Radio Free Asia, and the Middle Eastern radio broadcasting network.

In February, 2015, Secretary of State John Kerry, asked Congress to allocate more money to “promote democracy” around the world. “Russia today (as in the original. -“ NG ”) can be heard in English, do we have an equivalent that can be heard in Russian?” According to Kerry, 639 million dollars were needed, “to help our friends in Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, as they seek to strengthen their democracies, withstand pressure from Russia and more closely integrate into Europe. ”

The nature of the BBG’s activities in relation to Russia can be judged by the BBG budget request to the US Congress for the 2016 fiscal year. In March, 2015, the Agency asked 27,8 million for the implementation of five major projects, including: for the opposition of the IG - 6,1 million dollars and for the “opposition of revanchist Russia” - 15,4 million. That is, “revanchism” of Russia in the BBG price scale two and a half times more dangerous for the United States than the IG.

Speaking to the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee on March 3, 2015, US Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland said the State Department would significantly increase funding for the fight against “Kremlin propaganda that is poisoning the minds of all of Russia, its periphery and all of Europe.” . In 2015, the US Broadcasting Council increased funding for programs in Russian by 49% compared to 2014, bringing it to $ 23,2 million. In addition, the Department of State granted the request for an additional $ 20 million to “increase efforts.” fight against lies ”- meaning“ Kremlin propaganda ”. According to Nuland, part of the funds will be used to support student exchange programs and encourage a group of civic activists. But most of the money will be spent on training Russian-language journalists and providing them with access to factual issues. News. In addition to increasing the budget for the Broadcasting Council of the United States, Congress approved $ 10 million in support for Russian-language media in Eastern Europe. This decision was made in accordance with the law on the support of freedom of Ukraine.

EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTION TO CIVIL SOCIETY


In the United Kingdom, funding for the “democratization” of the countries of Eastern Europe and the former USSR is carried out through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the Department for International Development (DID) of the United Kingdom.

23 in November 2015 of the UK Government announced the five-year National Security Strategy and Strategic Defense and Security Review 2015 - SDSR-2015. The previous similar document was adopted in 2010 year (SDSR-2010).

In the preface to SDSR-2015, Prime Minister David Cameron promised that the country would use its huge development budget and its soft power to promote British values. The SDSR-2015 emphasizes that London will continue to use soft power to promote British "values ​​and interests." To this end, in particular, it is planned to expand the broadcasting of the BBC World Service Corporation to the territory of Russia, as well as the DPRK, the countries of the Middle East, Southeast Asia and Africa. The increase in funding for the BBC is spelled out in the document as a separate line. From 2017 – 2018 to the development of digital, television and radio products of the World Service, 85 million pounds sterling (130 million dollars) will be allocated annually.


The cult of nationalism is well cultivated in Western investment. Photo author

According to the corporation itself, in 2016 – 2017, funding will amount to 34 million pounds sterling (51,5 million dollars). In September, BBC, speaking of plans to intensify broadcasting to Russia, announced an expansion of its presence on the Internet on platforms such as Russian-speaking. YouTube segment and its Russian counterpart RuTube. At the same time it was said that an “assessment of the economic feasibility of creating a satellite television channel for Russia” would be carried out.

The Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD) is closely associated with the FCO and DID, which is why Western researchers point out its “quasi-governmental nature”. The fund was created following the model of the American NED to promote the development of democratic institutions abroad and is registered as a limited liability company. WFD receives funding from the FCO and DID. WFD reports on budget spending to the UK Parliament, which it openly declares on its official website.

In the European Union, the source of funding for “promoting democracy” is its highest executive body - the European Commission. Here, an analogue of the NED is the European Endowment for Democracy (European Endowment for Democracy - EED), designed to support democratic changes in the countries of the eastern and southern neighborhood of the European Union. EEV provides financial grants to journalists, bloggers, unregistered NGOs, as well as political movements, including those in exile. In 2015, the Foundation financed 155 initiatives that focus on “supporting democratic movements” in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, and some other countries. Financial injections from the EED can vary in size and duration. Average grants usually range from 10 to 150 thousand euros.

The activity of state funds, that is, fully funded by the state, has national or geopolitical goals. It is coordinated and controlled by state executive authorities. Such funds report on the expenditure of funds to the state represented by the parliament or an authorized department. From the budgets of the executive authorities the funds are transferred to the accounts of special international, regional and national funds.

In addition, the EU members are implementing their state program of financing NGOs in the countries of the former USSR. An example is the state program “Small Projects of the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands” (Matra / KAP).

The opposition in the post-Soviet space is also financed by neighboring states that have a common border or who consider the region to be a zone of their political and economic interests. Such funds include the Black Sea Regional Cooperation Fund, which is headquartered in Bucharest (Romania).

Budget funds intended to finance opposition political and social organizations and movements in Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and other republics of the former Soviet Union are transferred through the diplomatic missions of the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Switzerland and Sweden. Diplomatic missions distribute funds between large and medium opposition movements and organizations, and those, in turn, distribute them among smaller and very small local public organizations, whose number may not exceed 15 – 20 people.

PRIVATE FUNDS WILL HELP US

The second main source of funding for the opposition in the countries of the former USSR are private foundations. They form their budgets mainly through private and corporate charitable donations. According to specialists, in the USA alone there are more than 2 thousand. According to the volume of funds attracted for charitable purposes, they can be divided into large ones like the Ford Foundation with a budget of 598 million dollars and small ones like the J.M. Fund. Kaplan (JM Kaplan Found) with a budget of 6,9 million dollars. Funds also differ in targeted (protection of human rights, development of independent media, civilian control, democracy, etc.) and political (liberal and conservative) features. Among them are corporate, like the Ford Foundation or the Small Grants Program at the World Bank (headquartered in Washington, representation in Kiev), and financial and investment, like the Soros Foundation (Soros Foundation Network).

Together with private foundations, corporate funds are the second main source of funding for opposition organizations and protest movements at all stages of their development - from the formation of personnel to the direct implementation of color revolutions and the subsequent control over their results through the funds of opposition leaders. At the same time, the very concept of state sovereignty is blurred.

An example of successful activity in financing the preparation and implementation of the color revolution is the work of the Ukraine-USA Foundation. It was created in 1991, "to promote democracy, market reforms and human rights development in Ukraine" with the task of maintaining ties between the United States and Ukraine, "to make peace and prosperity possible through the development of common democratic values." Fund offices are located in Kiev, Donetsk, Lviv, Kharkov, Kherson and Cherkasy. The staffing of offices provides for positions of director, deputy director, accountant.

At the conference of the Ukraine-USA Foundation 13 December 2013, US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Ambassador Victoria Nuland said: “Since the declaration of Ukraine’s independence in 1991, the United States has been supporting the Ukrainian people in democratic skills and creating democratic institutions that want more active participation in civil life and good governance are necessary prerequisites for Ukraine to realize its pro-European aspirations. We have invested more than 5 billion dollars in an effort to help Ukraine achieve these and other goals designed to ensure the security, prosperity and democratic structure of the country.

Today, there are many influential people in the Ukrainian government, business circles, opposition, civil society and religious communities who believe in this democratic European future of their country and work tirelessly, trying to steer the country and its president in the right direction. We urge the government, we urge the president to listen to these voices, listen to the Ukrainian people, listen to the euromaidan and help Ukraine take a step forward. ”

Speaking before the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US 3 in March 2015, Victoria Nuland said the State Department would significantly increase funding for the fight against "Kremlin propaganda that poison minds throughout Russia, on its periphery and throughout Europe." The US Broadcasting Board of Directors in 2015 increased the amount of funding for programs in Russian by 49% compared to 2014, bringing it to 23,2 million dollars. The State Department granted the request for an additional $ 20 million to “increase efforts in fighting falsehood” - refers to the "Kremlin propaganda." According to Nuland, part of the funds will be used to support student exchange programs and encourage a group of civic activists. But most of the money will be spent on training Russian-speaking journalists and giving them access to fact-based news releases. In addition to increasing the budget of the US Broadcast Management Board, Congress approved expenditures in the amount of 10 million to support Russian-language media in Eastern Europe. This decision was made in accordance with the law on the support of the freedom of Ukraine.

The goal of any investment is to make a profit, it is an integral part of the modern economy. The ultimate goal of American diplomacy, as described in the Four-Year Review of Diplomacy and Development - 2015, is through the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership “to put the United States at the center of a free trade zone covering two-thirds of the global economy.”

Investments, unlike loans, always have a high degree of risk, as they return and only generate income in profitable projects. All of this is calculated in advance by governments when decisions are made to direct billions of dollars (pounds, euros) to weaken existing or potential competitors. And if the money for color revolutions from state budgets is still allocated, it means that someone needs it, then the risk is justified. Ultimately, the high stakes on the “Grand Chessboard” justify all possible temporary losses.
Author:
Originator:
http://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2016-01-15/1_revolutions.html
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Baikonur
    Baikonur 17 January 2016 20: 59 New
    +6
    Quote: author
    Who is financing the color revolutions in the post-Soviet space

    1. The author forgot to put a question mark. (?)
    2. The answer is USA !!!
    3. brazenly.
    4. sec.

    ps-arrogant-anglo-sec-sexy- = tolerance.
    Conchites in Yursty !!!
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 17 January 2016 21: 03 New
      22
      Who is financing the color revolutions in the post-Soviet space

      Who finances these comrades and many more.
      1. TұrKBөrӨ
        TұrKBөrӨ 18 January 2016 05: 20 New
        0
        No, they are just “gears” among Leib, Schiffs, Kans, Baruchs.
    2. NIKNN
      NIKNN 17 January 2016 21: 06 New
      12
      Well, this is the war against Russia, we are restricting NGOs, an alternative to our neighbors, to form a hostile environment in our circle. Only we have already been taught in Ukraine ... I think we’ll be smarter about these threats. request
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 17 January 2016 21: 35 New
        15
        Quote: NIKNN
        Well, this is the war against Russia, we are restricting NGOs, an alternative to our neighbors, to form a hostile environment in our circle. Only we have already been taught in Ukraine ... I think we’ll be smarter about these threats. request

        .. this war against Russia has been going on since about the 8th century .. not when, nor under any socio-political system .. Autocracy, Socialism, present capitalism .. while we control our territories and mineral reserves we will not be friends with Europe .. in 1991 we lost the battle, but not the war .. as it was centuries before .. Poles were in Moscow 1610-1612, expelled .. Napoleon entered Moscow 1812, expelled .. Anglo-Saxons rubbed their hands in 1917, the Russian Empire collapsed, rejoiced early, the USSR was formed .. 1941-1945 Fascists .. DESTROYED! .. The USSR went practically to the borders of the Russian Empire and controlled all of Eastern Europe .. STILL NOT EVENING, STILL NOT EVENING ! .. hi
        1. iliitchitch
          iliitchitch 18 January 2016 01: 52 New
          +6
          Quote: Inok10
          STILL NOT EVENING, STILL NOT EVENING! ..


          Of course, it’s just fun to watch how these chelas wad, gyhych ... and still nothing.
      2. Infernal man
        Infernal man 18 January 2016 09: 52 New
        0
        The state must be strong. Law-abiding citizens have nothing to fear. And for all crimes you need to be fully accountable. A strong state would have slammed at one stroke any attempts to get into its internal affairs. Problems with corruption would be many times less. There is more order. So it is possible to build an economy, etc. The Chinese, and that cause more respect for their tough totalitarian regime, overstepped somewhere - to the wall. And we were robbed, here's an elite conclusion in a multi-room apartment in the center of Moscow ...
        Any NPO immediately fell under the article.
    3. 222222
      222222 17 January 2016 21: 14 New
      +4
      ... those who are trying to solve their economic problems at the expense of others and who have money ..or a machine for printing them .. laughing
      1. Haettenschweiler
        Haettenschweiler 17 January 2016 21: 50 New
        -11
        - It's not that I found fault, but such mountains of all kinds of research, pseudo-research, analytics and other things are written on this subject. Less often, someone tries to find an antidote for such an invasion through “brain exercises”. But all this is the "mind games" of bookworms. With a rare exception, perhaps. I am firmly convinced that this is all in the Kremlin - far from news. And for us, for many reasons, this is not the main danger. In general, I do not see any need to again transfer from empty to empty, to shine with intellect and analytical thinking, telling a hundred times what was told. The article, of course, is a minus.
        1. V.ic
          V.ic 18 January 2016 10: 40 New
          0
          Quote: Haettenschweiler
          The article, of course, is a minus.

          What immediately "face on table"? A specific article has a specific minus / plus for (again) a specific blunder / clever idea, only in any way, and there are not many specifics in your statement.
    4. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 18 January 2016 01: 11 New
      +4
      When EBN insolent in the end. Now they are being pressed - peep, poor. And there is no question in the title of the article. This is a talk on who. That's okay. Let them know that behind them is the eye and the eye. If you want to get dirty as it should - come on, collaborate. All the same, these naive hegemons are naive. Well, from the word at all. As children. We do not mind their money. Let them spend it. In place of the FSB, he himself would open up some kind of organization such as the Union of the Sword and Shouting and would draw funds from the Amers for "subversive activities." All the same, their budget is not rubber ... And the FSB has additional funds
    5. twviewer
      twviewer 18 January 2016 02: 01 New
      0
      In Switzerland, a weakly colored revolution is bungled? why ?? :)
    6. forester
      forester 18 January 2016 05: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: Baikonur
      Quote: author
      Who is financing the color revolutions in the post-Soviet space

      1. The author forgot to put a question mark. (?)
      2. The answer is USA !!!
      3. brazenly.
      4. sec.

      ps-arrogant-anglo-sec-sexy- = tolerance.
      Conchites in Yursty !!!

      Yes, we have enough pests even without them - the entire so-called economic bloc of the government, headed by an iPhone, is making a lot of efforts to reduce the quality of life. Although they may not be pests, they are conscientious executors of the tasks of their real owners.
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 18 January 2016 07: 19 New
        +2
        Some theses of the information war against Russia. This is very concise and simplistic.
        1. Angry orc
          Angry orc 18 January 2016 19: 33 New
          0
          outdated information, counteraction is underway on all counts, but roads are an eternal problem :)
  2. moskowit
    moskowit 17 January 2016 20: 59 New
    +6
    Sweep everything to hell with a filthy broom! Whatever the spirit!
  3. jjj
    jjj 17 January 2016 21: 00 New
    15
    Golikova at the Gaidar Forum announced that the Accounts Chamber had found trillions of budget rubles that were not used in any way. Here is an honest word that the fear is created that this money is hacked to finance shares to overthrow the government
    1. nazar_0753
      nazar_0753 17 January 2016 21: 05 New
      +5
      Quote: jjj
      Golikova at the Gaidar Forum announced that the Accounts Chamber had found trillions of budget rubles that were not used in any way. Here is an honest word that the fear is created that this money is hacked to finance shares to overthrow the government

      these are governor stash
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur 17 January 2016 21: 19 New
        +5
        This is Golikova! She knows. she must be loved!
        other words - NO!
        She is crocodile!
        mini page!
        With Her mini-STERATION of health care, the Healthcare Preserved many Russians !!!
        now the ACCOUNTING BOARD counts.

        ps. - Gaydarovsk forum - A beautiful red name !!!
        Red-haired somehow - in the shade !!!
    2. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 17 January 2016 21: 15 New
      10
      But this has already passed ... in the late 80s, when it was necessary to create a protest ... Then the products were thrown into the garbage by convoys and much more ... You can’t repeat this catastrophe, saboteurs and Gaidarites to the answer!
      Quote: jjj
      Golikova at the Gaidar Forum announced that the Accounts Chamber had found trillions of budget rubles that were not used in any way. Here is an honest word that the fear is created that this money is hacked to finance shares to overthrow the government
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 17 January 2016 21: 32 New
        17
        Quote: dmi.pris
        You can not repeat this disaster, saboteurs and Gaidar to the answer!

        Moreover, the names of these citizens are well known to everyone. Aw, Vladimir Vladimirovich! The people are waiting! Not blood thirst, but justice. Can you change these specialists to other professionals? Worse still will not be.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Baikonur
          Baikonur 17 January 2016 22: 44 New
          +4
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          Quote: dmi.pris
          You can not repeat this disaster, saboteurs and Gaidar to the answer!

          Moreover, the names of these citizens are well known to everyone. Aw, Vladimir Vladimirovich! The people are waiting! Not blood thirst, but justice. Can you change these specialists to other professionals? Worse still will not be.

          !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          Full agreement!
          Grandpa-Gaidar spoke about Kibalchish - honor-honesty-truth-conscience-right
          st ...

          and THIS IS MOLD! LIES, STink, DANDRUFF, DIRT, ...
          bad guys !!!
          for a basket of cookies and a jar of jam. (only)
          1. V.ic
            V.ic 18 January 2016 10: 46 New
            0
            Quote: Baikonur
            Full agreement!

            ... except for the caption for the picture "BATTALION гAIDAR"...
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Platonich
          Platonich 18 January 2016 05: 27 New
          0
          Not a single smart face!
        5. Igor F.
          Igor F. 18 January 2016 06: 48 New
          0
          Well, yes, they will inherit after themselves and are not responsible for anything! It’s all the same simple people .. It’s like Chubais once: “Oh, how cool it will be, oh, how we’ll heal when we buy vouchers” .. But vouchers were “issued” for money (25 Soviet rubles, if I’m not mistaken) ..
        6. sa-ag
          sa-ag 18 January 2016 08: 03 New
          0
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          Can you change these specialists to other professionals?

          "There will be no one to work with" (C)
      2. cap
        cap 17 January 2016 21: 52 New
        +3
        Quote: dmi.pris
        But this has already passed ... in the late 80s, when it was necessary to create a protest ... Then the products were thrown into the garbage by convoys and much more ... You can’t repeat this catastrophe, saboteurs and Gaidarites to the answer!
        Quote: jjj
        Golikova at the Gaidar Forum announced that the Accounts Chamber had found trillions of budget rubles that were not used in any way. Here is an honest word that the fear is created that this money is hacked to finance shares to overthrow the government


        If there is such a nest egg. I also read about it (“The inspectors found a black hole in the budget.”) It is alleged that it will take time to figure out why they are not used, and their redistribution may jeopardize some programs. In addition, a decision of the State Duma and only then governments. And if they are in commercial circulation then investigations.
        It’s easier, of course, to privatize the assets of Sberbank (it’s not against it) and VTB that are in demand in the market, and thus plug a hole in the budget. In other words, go with the flow without affecting anyone’s interests. In other words: “to do it, just to do nothing " hi
        1. cap
          cap 17 January 2016 22: 13 New
          +5
          And here is the good news. I think the topic, and the place.

          “Vladimir Putin submitted for consideration by the State Duma“ one of the most dangerous laws that the modern history of Russia knew, ”the publication said. According to the author of the article, as soon as these laws have time to approve, they will create the “most terrible“ economic cyclone ”of those that the West has ever encountered.
          “These laws were conceived as Russia's decisive response to Western sanctions, which Moscow regards as“ aggression ”against itself. According to these bills, all Russian companies, public and private, must immediately suspend the payment of loans in the amount exceeding $ 700 billion to the banks of countries applying sanctions against Russia, as well as to banks with branches in these countries, ”the publication said.

          The author of the article believes that this legislative initiative will allow Russia to return the money that it lost as a result of "Western manipulation of world oil prices" and "attacks on the ruble."

          “Western manipulation” refers to “flooding the international oil market with more than 5 million extra barrels per day” —that Saudi Arabia did — and the manipulation of the New York Mercantile Exchange to lower oil prices.

          In addition, the consideration of the bill by the Russian parliament coincided with the opening of the St. Petersburg International Commodity and Raw Materials Exchange, which should withdraw Russia from the international system of the American petrodollar, "thereby ending American hegemony and the ability of the United States to finance its wars" at the expense of others, writes AgoraVox.

          In anticipation of the collapse of the petrodollar system, Putin is selling oil and gas for physical gold. So, from October to December 2014, Russia acquired 55 tons of gold, which exceeds the volume of purchases of precious metal from all banks in the world combined. ”
          http://tehnowar.ru/33805-putin-postavit-shah-i-mat-zapadu.html
          1. Genry
            Genry 18 January 2016 01: 53 New
            +1
            The source of AgoraVox (garbage ???).
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 17 January 2016 23: 11 New
        0
        Now no one will throw away products - time is not right.
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 17 January 2016 23: 10 New
      0
      This money has already been sent to pay off the budget deficit in 2016, and for the overthrow of power, an article is envisaged - and who will overthrow it, with what and how?
  4. Sinecote
    Sinecote 17 January 2016 21: 16 New
    +3
    “Over the past 20 years of work in Russia, USAID has provided about $ 2,7 billion for programs of various kinds,” said Nuland.
    That's who has nowhere to put money.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 17 January 2016 22: 13 New
      +3
      Sinecote! 21.16. Well, why they have nowhere to put money? Money is spent with meaning. Previously, companies went bankrupt, today countries. Progress! From the bankruptcy of countries and regions, someone is welded well. Bankrupt against the country, someone will start to suck out everything that is possible from them. We laugh at illiterate Africans. But until the 17th year, the Russians were also illiterate. In the countries of a victorious democracy, did everyone directly begin to study and respect human rights? Why do apologists for democracy not raise, but lower the standard of living there?
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 17 January 2016 23: 15 New
      +1
      Only in our country this money has already been stolen - allocate more guys.
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 17 January 2016 21: 19 New
    +7
    When EBN insolent in the end. Now they are being pressed - peep, poor. And there is no question in the title of the article. This is a talk on who. That's okay. Let them know that behind them is the eye and the eye. If you want to get dirty as it should - come on, collaborate. All the same, these naive hegemons are naive. Well, from the word at all. As children. We do not mind their money. Let them spend it. In place of the FSB, he himself would open up some sort of organization such as the Union of the Sword and Shouting and would draw funds from the Amers for "subversive activities." All the same, their budget is not rubber ... And the FSB has additional funds.
  6. izya top
    izya top 17 January 2016 21: 23 New
    10
    give me that money, I’ll quietly jump in the kitchen, then I’ll say that it didn’t work out request
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 17 January 2016 21: 36 New
      +5
      Quote: iza top
      I'll quietly jump in the kitchen

      I can help, but only in the kitchen. smile
      1. izya top
        izya top 17 January 2016 21: 43 New
        +3
        Quote: Vladimirets
        I can help, but only in the kitchen.

        Is it twice as much fuel to take?
        1. armata37
          armata37 17 January 2016 22: 55 New
          +3
          Take three times more) I'm with you! Is your kitchen big? Fit? laughing
          1. BARKHAN
            BARKHAN 18 January 2016 00: 35 New
            +4
            Quote: iza top
            give me that money, I’ll quietly jump in the kitchen, then I’ll say that it didn’t work out request

            Quote: Vladimirets
            Quote: iza top
            I'll quietly jump in the kitchen

            I can help, but only in the kitchen. smile

            Quote: iza top
            Quote: Vladimirets
            I can help, but only in the kitchen.

            Is it twice as much fuel to take?

            Quote: armata37
            Take three times more) I'm with you! Is your kitchen big? Fit? laughing

            Sorry for the indiscreet question ... do you have all the places occupied there? repeat I'm with mine. drinks
  7. The black
    The black 17 January 2016 21: 25 New
    +8
    Who finances is understandable. Another question: why we allow? it’s not a secret that the vast majority of NGOs are engaged in the so-called human rights activities (and, in fact, the organization of color revolutions) .... By the way, for violating the law on the activities of NGOs in “totalitarian Russia” - a fine, and in a “democratic USA - a time limit of 5 YEARS OLD. smile
    1. Pirogov
      Pirogov 17 January 2016 22: 52 New
      +6
      Liberastov time to put against the wall! Otherwise, it’s simply impossible!
      1. forester
        forester 18 January 2016 05: 52 New
        0
        Quote: Pirogov
        Liberastov time to put against the wall! Otherwise, it’s simply impossible!

        It’s not reasonable for her in the country to have a shortage of labor — for life-long labor reeducation — whom to appoint as a bulldozer who is a seamstress-minder
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 17 January 2016 23: 18 New
      0
      We admit, because these are easy money, for some people there will be no sense from them, but they will settle in their pockets.
  8. valent45
    valent45 17 January 2016 21: 34 New
    +5
    You can certainly not pay much attention to the activities of various NGOs
    in Russia, BUT they ideologically influence the population (negatively),
    especially in the current difficult situation for the country. Recently listened to the program
    "The right to vote" V. Ryzhkov, I think that such Judas still need to be sought.
  9. Chaos
    Chaos 17 January 2016 21: 58 New
    +2
    Nonsense is complete. everything is much more complicated. We finance Latin America, the Middle East, at one time Afghanistan, former owls. republics. But for some reason everyone is slipping out from under our influence. So we are bringing to the people not the values ​​that they want, they do not want to live under our influence. Hence the conclusion, let them go wherever they want. We have enough of our own problems, we need to solve in the direction of the well-being of every person in the Russian Federation. And so that we do not interfere, arrange tens of thousands of missiles with nuclear weapons. We will live in wealth and no one will climb to us. Or what does a person need?
    1. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 18 January 2016 06: 01 New
      +1
      Firstly, we have less money, secondly, we are not investing it there. Example Montenegro, people screaming, and do not care, they bought two dozen rulers, who did not buy, they intimidated, and at least scream ... And we are all schools, hospitals. Bandit methods are more effective than patrons. Shy too much.
  10. Ivan Ivanovich
    Ivan Ivanovich 17 January 2016 22: 06 New
    +7
    It’s necessary to put more bulky NGOs and invoice “mattresses”, let them chip in to the budget of the Russian Federation ..
  11. syndicalist
    syndicalist 17 January 2016 22: 11 New
    +4
    The current authorities, led by the guarantor, have made (and continue to make) so many mistakes and thefts that no fifth column is needed. And then from the article we can conclude that the king with the boyars is white and fluffy and only Masons muddied the country. Greed at the top conquers even the instinct of self-preservation
  12. Valter1364
    Valter1364 17 January 2016 22: 18 New
    +1
    Who is financing the color revolutions in the post-Soviet space?


    So it begs: "Who, who? A horse in a coat!"

    An article for those who are in the tank from the series "Who attacked us in 1941?".

    It would be funny if it were not so sad.
  13. Dam
    Dam 17 January 2016 22: 55 New
    +5
    Have you tried shooting? No one canceled the article about treason. Is it time to clean the 5th column?
  14. gendir.grifon
    gendir.grifon 17 January 2016 23: 14 New
    +4
    In addition to external enemies, we still have internal enemies that undermine our country from the inside. It's not a secret to anybody. Many of them hold high posts in government agencies and business, and head public and human rights organizations. Outwardly, everything is decent, because we have a kind of democracy, but the time will come and they will openly side with the enemy. Until the cold war became hot. This fifth column must be destroyed; everyone understands this, but there is no political will.
  15. Belarus
    Belarus 17 January 2016 23: 43 New
    +1
    Who finances this and the hedgehog is understandable. But the question is where the money comes from - although this is also a rhetorical question.
    A reasonable question follows: what and how to deal with it? Answer: for such NGOs and other evil spirits, only one thing needs to be done: outlaw these organizations with all the ensuing consequences for such defendants
    1. A.Lex
      A.Lex 18 January 2016 00: 05 New
      +2
      It seems that recently the law came out - on the answer, where did the money come from in the accounts of one or another NGO-NGO. And those who decided to keep quiet silently - covered up (not everyone is true, but scared many).
  16. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 18 January 2016 00: 43 New
    +3
    I’m wondering. Do our traitors really think that “abroad will help them.” Indeed, as history shows, they always wiped their ass with traitors. And do they really not understand that in our age of technology everything is recorded and stored. All these trips to the embassy for briefing ...
    And remember how Udaltsov was besieged on take-off ... After all, in fact, he turned out to be a rotten fruit, a traitor. It’s a very liberal state. In the USA, they would have warmed for life for a long time.
    1. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 18 January 2016 05: 55 New
      +1
      But by that, no less, they have been living in betrayal for 25 years, and they live well. Dear people! All at posts, at posts, at money, etc. And try the touch ...
  17. Support
    Support 18 January 2016 01: 00 New
    +2
    Who is financing? Yes, soon, along the way, it will not be necessary to finance. Judging by all the gestures of the fucking ministries and the prime minister himself, they will bring people to the point with their domestic policies. Well, it is necessary to bring the situation to the point where they are already starting to roll a barrel of GDP. In Kamchatka, for example, among junior medical workers (nurses), so to speak, they reduced the number of days on vacation, removed all surcharges for wages, while food prices (and the rest) rose and not weakly, housing and communal services also grow every quarter ( by myself I see), but the manager of the city of Slyshenko increased his salary last year (in the fall). What can I talk about? What kind of financing? People are already boiling. If you don’t talk about it much, it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t.
  18. Same lech
    Same lech 18 January 2016 02: 55 New
    +3
    Gref in his place has long been carrying out subversive work, and with our money ... he does not see this only as a blind man.
  19. Quager
    Quager 18 January 2016 05: 38 New
    0
    Quote: The same Lech
    Gref in his place has long been carrying out subversive work, and with our money ... he does not see this only as a blind man.


    He is not alone there!
  20. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 18 January 2016 05: 52 New
    0
    As of 26 in November of 2015, 87 NCOs were listed in the register of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation as a foreign agent, that is, receiving financial and material resources from foreign sources.

    Interested in the position of the state. Those. how many of them really stopped working? How many people are serving time? How many are kicked out of the country without the right of return entry?
    So far, only Nemtsov has paid the bills, and then on a private initiative. Rest..? Only pathetic attempts are visible, but this, not opposition, is just pampering. There is a war, where are the military countermeasures?
  21. Yak28
    Yak28 18 January 2016 06: 33 New
    +1
    Why not Russia arrange color revolutions where possible, for their own purposes. And not create terrorist organizations like the United States.
  22. nivander
    nivander 18 January 2016 10: 41 New
    0
    article 58-10 "Anti-Soviet agitation" of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1935. (up to 5 years)