Military Review

The main thing is profit

139
The main thing is profit. But for the country. I explain on a few specific examples.


Is there any benefit to the country from the prime minister? But how to say ... Recall only specific gifts left and right: 30 square kilometers of land to Azerbaijan, thousands of square kilometers of the sea - Norway. Well, well, I wait, when otkommentiruyut that it was he who only studied in the presidents. So let him say bluntly: “I’m not this one yet, I’m just learning, but how I’ll learn!” But to recall his New Year's Eve statement that everything will be fine? It seems that now he no longer thinks so. Isn't it cheaper to hire the soothsayer Paul Globa? At half time?

Is there any benefit to the country from the stratification of the population by income, from managers in state-owned companies that receive hundreds of millions? But how to say ... How can a person work conscientiously, from the heart, if he is told: “I am the boss, you are a fool. Now, if you're the boss, then I'm a fool. ” Or: "You live as you can, and I live as I want." It sounded here that the sweepers of "Gazprom" whistled an "exclusive" handbag for half a million. Well at least, rubles.

Is there a benefit from those in authority and messed up with suspicions? But how to say ... There is an expression: "Caesar's wife is above suspicion." This is me to the fact that close to the top or should be clean, or driven out / planted.

There is a benefit from those who shout: “Divan strategist!”, “Rocking the boat!”, “Who is not behind the course of Putin and the government, he is not even the eighth column, he is an aggressor from Alpha Centauri!”? Interestingly, screamers are friendly? Interestingly, they see that the country has not developed for several years? And the States, yes, our enemy, the economy is growing! Real economy! And not to say that Russia has nowhere to develop, that it has reached heights. And for growth there is everything: people, minerals, currency, and China and South Korea will sell any production. But our economic bloc (sorry, Lord, for the expression) is waiting for investment ... from enemies.

And so I really sofa strategist. I'm under seventy, I supervised and I gained physically. These are ours, at the top, they did not lead / did not command the brigade or platoon, but I was stifling.

Will there be a benefit from accepting Glazyev’s proposals? As the manufacturer declare: will. He offers to get away from feudalism (and how else will you call what is?). However, is it the boyars and the king-father need? Mr. Gref called here our country the loser. Where to go further! And he and his fellow friends seem to have nothing to do with it. It remains only to hear that with any others it would be worse ... We’ve heard about Yeltsin - he is a savior, without him the Martians would ruin Russia ... Therefore, the Yeltsin Center, built under the law on former presidents for nine budget billions, is deceased president deserved.

For whom to vote in the fall, I have not decided. The Kremlin formatted everything so much that everyone disgusted me. But, probably, I will vote for the Communists, although I get nauseated from Zyuganov. And because not only from textbooks, but also from life, I know that hunting is more difficult than bondage, and in fairer conditions people work better, and, therefore, live better.

Admit those who were in favor of the “ER”: why did you vote this way?

And in conclusion, a sad joke, based on facts: “Having learned about millions of supporters of MMM, I have no doubt of the fair victory of United Russia in the elections.”

And for information: the communist ideology based on justice is much worse for the West than even the “Popular Front” and our ICBMs. And let me remind you that clever Joseph Vissarionovich tried: before the war, he cleared all the real “fifth column”.
Author:
139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pereira
    Pereira 19 January 2016 05: 54 New
    15
    Benefit from the authorities? Of course there is. Just not for us.
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 19 January 2016 06: 22 New
      +4
      You are right, but not only with us. Who thinks that the authorities are free to make any decisions? If there are such, then they are naive people. Any power in the world works for someone, but mainly for those whom we call "moneybags" Is this a secret? Analyze everything that is happening around and come to the same conclusion. And I don't want to vote for Zyuganov, to be honest, he's tired of him. Some correct conversations and no right deeds ... Yes, and for others - there is no one to vote for.
      1. JACTUS RECTUS
        JACTUS RECTUS 19 January 2016 06: 32 New
        +2
        Vote for air defense.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 19 January 2016 06: 37 New
          21
          Honest, fair article. The author knows life, honestly worked all his life. His soul hurts - he is offended by the State! And after all, he said everything correctly! Only here is how we will get out of this situation - I do not know. Need to think.

          To the author for the article +
          1. larand
            larand 22 January 2016 15: 18 New
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            But I don’t know how we will get out of this situation. Need to think.


            Of course, you can think about it, but they won't let you realize it. They do not need "ordinary people" to live normally. In this case, after all, "seditious thoughts" may appear. And when "ordinary people" are fighting to survive, they have no time for thoughts, to feed themselves.
        2. ImPerts
          ImPerts 19 January 2016 07: 55 New
          0
          Yeah, block C-300 and C-400)))
        3. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 19 January 2016 10: 10 New
          +3
          Quote: JACTUS RECTUS
          Vote for air defense.


          Do not consider it a work, Alexey, tell me what or who is this (t) "air defense"? I racked and puzzled, but to my shame I did not understand. hi
          1. JACTUS RECTUS
            JACTUS RECTUS 19 January 2016 15: 32 New
            +3
            Great Fatherland Party.
            1. PHANTOM-AS
              PHANTOM-AS 19 January 2016 22: 40 New
              +8
              Author plus!
              All of us were boiling, all of us suddenly began to expect something from the Camprador-oligarchic authorities, something we expected from the president, something from a madness, something from the government.
              like: "Oh, it's not difficult to deceive me,
              I am happy to deceive myself.
              I love balls, where people are crowded,
              But the royal parade is boring to me. "
              And what were they waiting for? socialist "carrots" from the capitalists?
              ideology? (maybe someone canceled "man to man wolf" when cap-me)
              Or did we all suddenly decide that we would live like in Europe or in Europe, being, in fact, their colony?
              All that remained of that Great country of Ours was the nuclear shield bent over by our fathers and that's it, we have no more attributes of a great power. Nothing! There are pumped out and exported minerals and semi-finished products in the form of ingots of nickel, aluminum, cast iron, etc. and so on.
              Well, yes, there are also modernized models of the Su-27, MiG-29, T-72 and the imperishable Soyuz ..., and also the Varshavyanka ..., that is, everything that was designed and developed more than 30 years ago.
              All these are the greatest achievements of modern power history, and the main thing is some kind of trouble with oil, damn it, well, our oil for 120 raccoons is not needed, no one just needs it!
              Well, yes, Syria ... Would there be Syria without Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya? Or was not Libya the last stronghold?
              And in the meantime ... we already have 80 rubles a raccoon, and the Central Bank ... in cabbage, why is the prime minister mumbling there ..., the president after the holidays in Krasnaya Polyana is not particularly good either ...
              And ...? We are waiting for what? and from whom?
            2. Vladimir 1964
              Vladimir 1964 20 January 2016 00: 43 New
              0
              Quote: JACTUS RECTUS
              Great Fatherland Party.


              Thank you, Alexey, I have no idea about the existence of such a party. Unless, of course, colleague, you are not trolling me. hi
      2. Pereira
        Pereira 19 January 2016 08: 10 New
        +5
        I know all this. And Zyuganov is generally an opportunist. He is now very comfortable.
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 19 January 2016 10: 58 New
        10
        Quote: Tartar 174
        And I don't want to vote for Zyuganov, to be honest, he's tired of him. Some correct conversations and no right deeds ... Yes, and for others - there is no one to vote for.

        And no one is campaigning for Zyuganov. The Zyuganovs come and go, but the socially oriented policy remains.
        In addition, in the fall, we will not elect the president, but the deputy corps to the Duma, where today United Russia rules, through which the champions of the ideas of economic liberalization and cuts in social programs and pass their own laws, the effect of which we observe in the collapse of education, medicine, pensions, etc.
        Today, even having united in one bloc, the deputies of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the SR and the Liberal Democratic Party cannot block the adoption of a single law because of the decision of the United Russia.
        So the main goal for the people in the upcoming autumn elections should be the task of depriving United Russia of the status of the "Duma majority".
        And the fact that someone likes or does not like Zyuganov or Mironov and Zhirinovsky is secondary, because we will only choose from them in 2018.
      4. user
        user 19 January 2016 21: 19 New
        +1
        Any power in the world works for someone


        Then everyone go to the polls, no matter who you vote for, but you will see (though most likely for a very short time) that the authorities are working for the voters.
        1. PHANTOM-AS
          PHANTOM-AS 19 January 2016 21: 54 New
          +2
          Quote: user
          that the government also works for voters.

          Why bash that in vain? request
    2. rpek32
      rpek32 19 January 2016 06: 31 New
      +6
      It sounded here that the "exclusive" purse for one and a half million was whistled at the Gazprom cleaning lady. Well at least rubles.

      A bag for 2 million was stolen from a cleaning lady of Gazprom

      On January 12, Lifenews reported that a Gazprom cleaning lady contacted the police, and a Dior bag worth 300 rubles was stolen from an SUV. The woman left her Mitsubishi Outlander in the parking lot of the Rumyantsevo business center in New Moscow. It took the attackers only three minutes to commit the theft.
      It is noteworthy that Lifenews did not even refer to any source in law enforcement. However, many media outlets risked citing the publication, because despite the scandalous nature of the resource, it usually still gives truthful information. And it was not easy to resist the temptation to amaze readers with the fact that even a Gazprom cleaning lady can afford a crocodile leather bag and an SUV.

      "The cleaning lady from" Gazprom "" suddenly became a meme on social networks, the story was overgrown with new details. So, in the Moscow branch of Dior reported that such a bag does not cost 300 thousand, but 2 million rubles. The media immediately suggested that the robbers were most likely interested in the accessory, and not in its contents.
      No one paid any attention to the timid and perplexed remark of the police representative of the Troitsky and Novomoskovsky administrative districts. And he said that the media had grossly exaggerated the cost of the stolen purse and that in none of the case materials hundreds of thousands, let alone millions of rubles, did not appear. And the victim herself did not declare the stolen handbag a special value, she was more worried about the loss of documents and 15 thousand rubles in cash.
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL 19 January 2016 07: 39 New
        +4
        [quote = rpek32] [quote] A bag for 2 million was stolen from a cleaning lady of Gazprom

        "The cleaning lady from Gazprom" overnight became a meme on social networks, [/ quote]

        "The cleaning lady from Gazprom? Hmm-hmm -...
        ... Semyon Mikhailovich Budyonny was once asked: "Tell me please, do you like Babel?"
        To which he replied: "It depends on what a babel!" ...
        ... A cleaning lady from Gazprom? ...
      2. Dembel77
        Dembel77 19 January 2016 07: 42 New
        14
        Quote: rpek32
        rpek32 (2) Today, 06:31 ↑ New
        It sounded here that the "exclusive" purse for one and a half million was whistled at the Gazprom cleaning lady. Well at least rubles.

        You are a plus. For impartiality. On the topic of the article, I will quote from your publication.
        Strelkov is sure that both in Russia and in any other state there should be the power of merit, not money, family ties or some kind of authority. Power should be for the people, and not vice versa, he stressed. Therefore, in Russia itself, it is important to develop social lifts that will send really worthy and deserved people upstairs. Http://topwar.ru/77832-igor-strelkov-priznalsya-v-tom-chto-ne-chist-aki-go
        lub.html
        This proposal of Strelkov, in my opinion, is worthy of discussion, tk. it contains specifics. Unlike many of our comments. We are all masters of scolding!
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 19 January 2016 08: 21 New
          +3
          This proposal by Strelkov, in my opinion, is worthy of discussion, because it contains specifics.


          Dear comrade, social elevators tend to be controlled. Therefore, only those who will carry the one who has the control panel in their hands will go to them. Therefore, it is clear that close and close take off to the top. And, given the high disinterestedness of those in power, it is clear that thieves and mobsters ride the same elevators. And even if you accidentally get into this elevator, you must either adapt or throw it away and it’s good if you don’t break your head when you fall.

          So your offer will not work either. And it remains what he said, bite the bullet and wait. Try to adapt and do not become like that. And do not miss the chance if he introduces himself.
          1. AUL
            AUL 19 January 2016 10: 25 New
            -3
            Would put the article a big plus, if not for the last 4 paragraphs. The author began for health, finished for peace!
            1. Scoun
              Scoun 19 January 2016 15: 45 New
              +2
              Quote: AUL
              Would put the article a big plus, if not for the last 4 paragraphs. The author began for health, finished for peace!

              Like
              Interestingly, screamers are friendly with the head? Interestingly, do they see that the country has not developed for several years? And the States, yes, our enemy, has a growing economy! Real economy!

              and at this time
              North Dakota Oil Price Falls Below Zero
              According to Auers and the president of Lipow Oil Associates from Houston, if producers have to pay to buy oil from them, there is only one way out - to stop production.

              follow the link and watch cargo transportation in the Atlantic ... how everything grows negative ...
              http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BDIY:IND

              or
              French President François Hollande on Monday during his speech announced the introduction of a "state of emergency" in the country's economy.

              Admit those who were in favor of the “ER”: why did you vote this way?

              I have never done this))) since their very formation, the entire administrative resource has clearly warmed up there.


              In the United States with its growing economy ... let's remember some names ...
              Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama (a relative of Cheney and the Bushs) new candidates Jeb Bush, Clinton Hillary ... not all the norms of democracy ...
              but nothing that in the US every fourth has a criminal record? but nothing that has a criminal record can vote for free (he can vote by paying an amount of about $ 10000)
              Among the distant relatives of Stanley was a relative of the President of the Confederation Jefferson Davis and several presidents of the United States: James Madison, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush.

              The fact that a bunch of disgusting things are happening is true, the Plato law / extortion was created in the interests of Rotenberg, Tickets declared in Sochi are 150 rubles and sold for 750 rubles is .... or in Sochi the person standing behind the ticket for three hours ... or salad for 1200 rubles ...
              What to do? no one sees the recipe as such ..
              I am only glad that the people began to react to some events and sign petitions ... in order to somehow influence **** her on the ground.
            2. larand
              larand 22 January 2016 11: 54 New
              +3
              Quote: AUL
              The author began for health, finished for peace!

              You hinted at this in a very timely manner. They (the owners) will get out, but all of us will definitely rest. Yesterday the guarantor again uttered a catchphrase about the atomic bomb from Lenin. So what happens? Lenin's rule led to the collapse of the country, though 67 years after his death. Stalin's time was ugly. Brezhnev's time is stagnant. It turns out that only the Gorbachev-Yeltsin rule is normal from the point of view of the current government. Gorbachev was awarded the highest award of the Russian Federation. Yeltsin built a freak show either 7, or 9 billion rubles. It turns out that we lived and are living in the period of the best rulers, but due to our stupidity we did not understand this. We should be happy, but we are all dissatisfied with something.
        2. Ros 56
          Ros 56 19 January 2016 12: 37 New
          +3
          Quote: Dembel 77
          Strelkov is sure that both in Russia and in any other state there should be the power of merit, not money, family ties or some kind of authority. Power should be for the people, and not vice versa, he stressed. Therefore, in Russia itself, it is important to develop social lifts that will send really worthy and deserved people upstairs. Http://topwar.ru/77832-igor-strelkov-priznalsya-v-tom-chto-ne-chist-aki-go

          lub.html
          This proposal by Strelkov, in my opinion, is worthy of discussion, because it contains specifics.


          I strongly disagree. This proposal by Strelkov is non-negotiable. It should be taken as an axiom.
      3. antoXa
        antoXa 19 January 2016 12: 40 New
        +3
        rpek32
        Sheer nonsense about the cleaning lady from Gazprom ... there the cleaning lady gets, well, maybe a little more than in any other place.
        And most of the rank and file, including heads of departments and even higher, receive a salary that is quite average for Moscow, I repeat FOR MOSCOW! that is, an employee of any average bank, of which there are hundreds or an average commercial relatively successful firm in Moscow, receives the same amount as an employee of Gazprom.
        Under the article, yes! Of course I agree that it is a shame for the country and for ordinary citizens, but to put the question like that "is there a benefit from the authorities?" not appropriate. In the same way, the question can be posed, is there any benefit to ordinary employees of the company from the owners of the company ??? Well, probably there is, if the company did not have owners, then the company would not exist, and an ordinary employee would simply not work anywhere.
        Of course, many will now say that the comparison is not correct, since they are servants of the people and what they dispose of is everything that is national ...
        But gentlemen, let's not deceive ourselves, almost all the resources of our country have belonged to specific people for decades. And if not even legally, then in fact. Accordingly, the comparison of our state with a huge corporation is quite appropriate.
        Regarding the elections, I haven’t finally decided for myself whether not to go to them again or what? (((I don’t know honestly - this tool is useless in my opinion, but there is no other.
        Last time, like the author of the article, he voted for the communists, but knowing personally some of the "people's representatives" from this party, I can say that their ideology is no different from United Russia, as well as everyone else's.
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 19 January 2016 14: 10 New
          +3
          Well, probably there is, if the company did not have owners, then there would be no company, and an ordinary employee would simply not work anywhere.


          But in the USSR there were no owners, but factories worked and people worked for them too. Ambush.
          1. antoXa
            antoXa 19 January 2016 18: 31 New
            0
            alicante11
            It may not have happened in the USSR, but now it is not then and will not be. And we must live today and in the current conditions try to make sure that ordinary people can live normally and not arrange a bloody revolution and somehow not break up with all world capital completely, because without them we will be friends in the anus today is a fact.
            1. Alf
              Alf 19 January 2016 23: 40 New
              +4
              Quote: antoXa
              And we must live today and in the current conditions try to make sure that ordinary people can live normally.

              And you go to Deripaska, Vekselberg or Prokhorov and tell them, boys, pay the workers more. I wonder what will be the route they recommend to you?
              and somehow not to break with all world capital completely,

              And, excuse me, is the world capital our friend? Maybe it's time to take off your rose-colored glasses? In the 90s, we already believed in peaceful, friendly capitalism. For the results, just look out the window.
              And we’ll get angry, so what? Who needs who? Russia to the West or the West of Russia? They need us and not vice versa.
              1. antoXa
                antoXa 20 January 2016 10: 43 New
                -1
                Alf
                So what's your recipe? Just criticize everyone? or, what do you suggest, I don’t understand the revolution first in the country, and then the world revolution, as usual, or what?
                1. Alf
                  Alf 20 January 2016 22: 12 New
                  0
                  Quote: antoXa
                  Alf
                  So what's your recipe? Just criticize everyone? or, what do you suggest, I don’t understand the revolution first in the country, and then the world revolution, as usual, or what?

                  Do you know another way to change the social model of the state? Or are you going to wait until gentlemen capitalists decide to make the lives of ordinary people better? Something tells me that such goodwill can be expected until Easter.
                  1. antoXa
                    antoXa 21 January 2016 11: 32 New
                    -2
                    Alf
                    well, yes, it's easier to drown the whole country in blood than to move your brains
        2. Ros 56
          Ros 56 19 January 2016 16: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: antoXa
          Sheer nonsense about the cleaning lady from Gazprom.

          You do not quite correctly interpret events. This is the director of a company for the provision of cleaning services (cleaning of premises, washing floors, windows, etc.), if I am not mistaken, in common parlance, a cleaner.
          1. antoXa
            antoXa 19 January 2016 18: 25 New
            0
            Ros 56
            perhaps then there is actually nothing to be surprised at
  2. 24rus
    24rus 19 January 2016 06: 03 New
    -17
    Is it really not visible, now the leader has given all his attention to foreign policy. When it comes to the inside, don't worry
    1. dr. sem
      dr. sem 19 January 2016 06: 24 New
      12
      Will never reach it. For 16 years, hands have not reached the solution of internal problems, and now it's too late. The guarantor already exists in the "survival mode" of the political and physical. What is, suits him. He himself stated this many times.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 06: 40 New
        +4
        Quote: dr. sem
        Will NOT reach anybody

        Yeah, Russia is over laughing
        1. Ruslan67
          Ruslan67 19 January 2016 07: 12 New
          +1
          With Vologda? Romanich drinks Well, you are as always request
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 19 January 2016 08: 13 New
            +3
            Vologda oil is over. The key dairy complex is sold to Moscow dealers. Very soon, under a promoted brand will be sold.
        2. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 19 January 2016 08: 13 New
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Yeah, Russia is over

          Hello Sasha, someone is so radical - Russia is not only Putin ..
          1. Ros 56
            Ros 56 19 January 2016 16: 41 New
            +7
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            Russia is not only Putin ..

            but Gref, and Medvedev, and Siluanov, and Gaidar (former), and Khoroshavin, and prosecutors near Moscow - to list everyone, a day is not enough.
            I beg your pardon, I could not resist, already boiling inside
    2. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 19 January 2016 06: 30 New
      11
      Quote: 24rus
      Is it really not visible, now the leader has given all his attention to foreign policy. When it comes to the inside, don't worry


      1. Does he drive and pedal alone for the entire government? If so, what are the tons of parasites, the content of which costs colossal money?

      2. When it comes to domestic politics, if for almost two decades of his reign the people in the government are still the same, the actions are the same, the problems are the same?
    3. EvgNik
      EvgNik 19 January 2016 06: 34 New
      15
      Quote: 24rus
      When it comes to the inside don't worry

      "When the master comes, the master will judge us" (c).
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 19 January 2016 07: 16 New
        +9
        Quote: 24rus
        When it comes to the inside don't worry

        Our government is obliged to steer domestic politics, this is its direct function. And if the government does not work, then the demand from the one who appointed and is obliged to control this government, i.e. from the president. So I have a question for the president: how long? Isn’t it time to think about changing this gang of loafers and talkers to those who will at least do something to overcome that ass into which the country has been carefully driven?
        1. Alf
          Alf 19 January 2016 23: 50 New
          0
          Quote: inkass_98
          So I have a question for the president: how long? Isn't it time to think about changing this gang of idlers and talkers for those who will at least do something

          I am moved by such statements. And who is the president, where is he from? He comes from the same circle. He was put to work by this circle and they will take him off, both in the direct and in the 7,62-mm sense. Will he go against their will? Correctly Ivashov said, Our policy is subordinated to the interests of big business.
      2. CONTROL
        CONTROL 19 January 2016 07: 51 New
        +1
        Quote: EvgNik
        Quote: 24rus
        When it comes to the inside don't worry

        "When the master comes, the master will judge us" (c).

        ... so after all - "master" or "ram"? ...
        "Barin", like "ram" - he is for those who "without a king in their heads" but what about those who "... you can shave off a beard, but ..." ... and further in the text!
    4. Nix1986
      Nix1986 19 January 2016 06: 56 New
      -2
      Fuck dude, you know something that we don't know ?! Does the guarantor already have a list of proscriptions under the pillow? My advice to you, keep quiet about this secret, don't tell anyone !!! laughing
  3. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 19 January 2016 06: 03 New
    18
    Why are you fuming? We live in an oligarchic state. Some are clerks, others are governors. The lady for the clerks, the GDP for the governors. As my dad said, "ours are not there."
    So far, I like "air defense" more.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 06: 21 New
      +2
      Can any of you suggest something better?
      1. Mera joota
        Mera joota 19 January 2016 06: 35 New
        12
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Can any of you suggest something better?

        "Transparent society", the constant change of power, its openness up to the defeat of civil rights in the field of disclosure of income and expenses, in general, the control of society over power in the absolute. Well, the dictatorship of the law as in Singapore.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 06: 44 New
          +1
          Quote: Mera Joota
          "Transparent Society"

          What is this?
          Quote: Mera Joota
          constant turnover of power,

          And who is better than Putin, offers something?
          Quote: Mera Joota
          , in general, the control of society over power in the absolute

          What planet are you from?
          Quote: Mera Joota
          Well, the dictatorship of the law as in Singapore.

          Start with yourself, though at the right place to cross the street.
          1. Ruslan67
            Ruslan67 19 January 2016 07: 15 New
            +4
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Start with yourself, though at the right place to cross the street.

            You should have heard how my son-in-law is the stuff of cops when you drove under a brick winked laughing 20 thousand like from a bush sad
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 07: 36 New
              +6
              Quote: Ruslan67
              20 thousand like from a bush

              Took off the cop?
              1. Ruslan67
                Ruslan67 19 January 2016 07: 44 New
                +1
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Took off the cop?

                I was not in the car request I would also have a trump card of evil soldier am
                1. Alf
                  Alf 19 January 2016 23: 54 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Ruslan67
                  I wasn’t in the car.

                  Do you have a blue number or a flashing light?
            2. Alf
              Alf 19 January 2016 23: 53 New
              +2
              Quote: Ruslan67
              You should have heard how my son-in-law is the stuff of cops when you drove under a brick

              And why did he flop under the "brick"? Maybe he can teach him the PPD? Interesting system of thinking - I deliberately break the law, and if I am caught, then the "goats" cops.
      2. EvgNik
        EvgNik 19 January 2016 06: 45 New
        +6
        The best was already, only the top could not understand this, they wanted a sweet life (as if they were already living badly: special distributors, special departments in stores, special rations and so on, right down to special girls).
        And let me remind you that clever Iosif Vissarionovich did his best: before the war he cleaned out the entire real “fifth column”.

        Not all, however, someone stayed. And after the war, it had to be thoroughly cleaned. The same Bandera supporters.
        1. max702
          max702 19 January 2016 07: 51 New
          10
          Quote: EvgNik
          only the top could not understand this, they wanted a sweet life (as if they had a bad life anyway: special distributors, special departments in stores, special rations, and so on, up to special girls).

          This is a miserable existence in comparison with the opportunities that they have now .. What shone even for a very high-ranking official in the USSR? Rest on the "golden sands", a seagull, and a birch tree. Well, maybe a special distributor for grocery, a dacha there in the suburbs, a special apartment in the center and a couple of servants .. AND EVERYTHING! Compare with now! Owned by the largest factories and corporations, free movement around the world, astronomical accounts, the best sports teams in the world, yachts at the cost of an aircraft carrier, islands in the ocean, villas on the Cote d'Azur, Miss World in mistresses, kids in the most prestigious universities, about shopping in the best stores in the world , and I'm not even talking about the cream of the car industry .. And of course this is subject to "handshake" and work in the interests of the powerful .. I hope it is clear why the bureaucrats wanted to sell their homeland? The only hope is that after getting drunk on all of the above, they will want more, namely, much sweeter that was from the officials of the USSR and not from the Russian bureaucrats .. I'm talking about POWER .. About that your opinion should be listened to and afraid of your anger, so as not to be on running errands like now, but really something to decide on a global scale .. But all this is impossible without a strong and independent country in which you live and rule. That's just the hope that having received all the imaginable benefits possible to buy for money, he will want to be real someone .. Judging by some events in the country, it came to someone and some who wanted to be, and not to seem .. But so far there are too few of them .. Time until it comes, but will they have time? On the other hand, the enemy is a seasoned one and they least want to allow competitors to the real power, and the events taking place (oil, sanctions, Ukraine) in the world speak of this directly .. locomotives must be pressed while they are teapots! So they are crushing ..
          1. alicante11
            alicante11 19 January 2016 08: 30 New
            +2
            The only hope is that after eating all of the above, I’d like more,


            You confuse officials and their owners - owners. Officials do not have yachts at the price of an aircraft carrier. And the official who has this is the boss anyway, only who doesn’t hide behind a pawn in a tie, but leads his own hands. And the owners have so much power that no "party bonzes" have dreamed of.
            1. max702
              max702 19 January 2016 11: 34 New
              0
              Quote: alicante11
              You confuse officials and their owners - owners. Officials do not have yachts at the price of an aircraft carrier. And the official who has this is the boss anyway, only who doesn’t hide behind a pawn in a tie, but leads his own hands. And the owners have so much power that no "party bonzes" have dreamed of.

              Think too small .. I'm talking about power on a global scale, about the one that allows you to decide something not at the level of a district or a plant, a ministry, but at least have the power to influence public policy, but better on a global scale .. So that your will is carried out and feared disobey .. The officials of the USSR, with all their poverty in comparison with the world tycoons, it was, but the Russian bureaucrats, with all their material wealth, do not! As soon as they really want to steer something, then there are hopes for changes in the country. and if their satisfying life at the current trough suits them, then there is no chance of improving life in the country for ordinary people ..
              1. alicante11
                alicante11 19 January 2016 14: 06 New
                0
                Think a little .. I’m talking about power on a global scale, about that which allows you to decide something not at the district or factory level, ministry, but at least have the power to influence public policy,


                So am I about that. How is an oligarch different from a rich businessman? The oligarch has political influence.

                but better on a global scale ..


                But you already swung it. There are millennial bison sitting there, who were still enslaved in serfdom, even in slavery, by our ancestors of our sworn partners. And you are talking about "caring."


                For all the misery of the officials of the USSR, compared with the world’s bigwigs, this was


                Well, ours do. To chop off the Crimea, to bomb in Syria, than not geopolitics? It's just that the scale of the zone of influence is smaller.
        2. alicante11
          alicante11 19 January 2016 08: 08 New
          10
          The best was already, only the top could not understand it, they wanted a sweet life


          Dear comrade, here you are pointing to the “top”. Excuse me, where are you, specifically you were when the Union collapsed? What do I propose to ask myself this question to everyone on this site. Is that with the exception of those who lay this time in a stroller or went to kindergarten / nursery / early. classes. And, first of all, the author of the article should remember this. Because he says everything is true. And DAM is bad and the GDP drives at the direction of the oligarchs, on whom, accordingly, there is nowhere to put samples. And in everything except, perhaps, the growth of the real economy in the USA, I agree with the author. BUT ... gentlemen, comrades, first of all, we ourselves made our country like that, and since the author of 71 was a year old, he did it because in the 91 he was ... a minute ... 47 years old, quite able-bodied and fighting age, although not the dawn of strength, of course. We gave it to the oligarchs, gave it away for jeans, chewing gum, VCRs and Rambo First Blood for them. So who are you blaming?
          Secondly, yes, the power is bad, but who, except for the marshes, even lifted a finger to change something? What are your intelligible suggestions? WHO IS GUILTY - we know you say WHAT TO DO? Do not vote for EP? And who to vote for? For the Communist Party, in which a week after winning the election will be 90% of EDR asset? Or vote for the "swamp", put the head of state Teft? Will it be better?
          There are no offers, then on whose mill is the author's article pouring water? Yes, on the same - on the "swamp". Because only THEY are really against the government. And all the rest are sitting exactly on the priests and waiting for the manna of heaven to fall down in the form of a "good king." But he does not fall down and does not fall down. And it will not fall, because, unfortunately, Russia fell into the hands of the owners. What is real, only they have money, only they have production, only they have power and power structures, even the President is “with them”. This power is not comparable with that of the tsarist or Soviet. Because under the tsar there were merchants, industrialists who had money and could create an opposition to tsarism. Under the USSR there was a separate party of power, which wanted to "reign and rule all." Now there is not a single independent political or economic force.
          For this reason, nothing now depends on us.
          What to do if a person understands all this? Indeed, sometimes it’s real easy to give up; living with this understanding is unbearable. But I have to. The task of every Russian patriot, as the communists said in the past, is to keep abreast of the political situation. And if suddenly there is a chance to once again save the Motherland from occupation, then do not slap him mediocrely, as they slapped the chance to prevent it in the 91. You need to understand that power is now under the monstrous pressure from the West. And if she can’t stand it ... And she can’t stand it, because the forces in the economy and the military field are too unequal. At the same time, power does not rely on the people, they have nothing but money, and money tends to run out. And when the money runs out, and the bureaucratic-power rat community flees from the sinking oligarchic ship, then we will have a chance. The truth is small, unfortunately, because the West does not fight against the Russian oligarchs, but against Russia and you and me. But such a chance will be, as in 1917, and to miss it will be completely not excusable.
          1. AUL
            AUL 19 January 2016 10: 56 New
            0
            Why, in fact, do you link two unrelated moments - the collapse of the Union and the current government in the Russian Federation? Do you think that today's Asian bai, khans and emirs, if they were part of the Union, would not plunder the people as much as our rulers are now plundering them? Yes, I beg you ...
            And further. You yourself write that only the "swamp" really oppose this government, and the rest of the indignant sit on the priest exactly. And at the same time, you condemn them, the swamps. You will already decide on your attitude to the marsh, otherwise it is impossible to be a little pregnant!
            1. alicante11
              alicante11 19 January 2016 11: 36 New
              +4
              And why, in fact, are you linking two unrelated moments - the collapse of the Union and the current government in the Russian Federation?


              And what is their difference? Chubais planted? Privatization revised? Whose assistant was the GDP in St. Petersburg? Do you know Sobchak? Who blessed the kingdom GDP? EBN and BAB, are these characters familiar? And who gave the order to Gorbachev, is it DAM? A monument to EBNu was not built by the "current government"?

              Do you think that today's Asian bais, khans and emirs, if they were part of the Union, would not have robbed the people as our people are now robbing them?


              On the "bais, emirs and khans" in the image of the 1-th secretaries of the regional and regional committees there was a government in Moscow. And now the President is already robbing. He is the protégé of such "bais and khans" in the person of the oligarchs. So there is no council for them.

              And at the same time, you condemn them, bogs. You already decide on your attitude towards the marsh, otherwise it is impossible to be a little pregnant!


              I condemn. But not for speaking out against the authorities, but for betraying Russia, because they play into the hands of our enemies in the West.
            2. Alf
              Alf 20 January 2016 00: 00 New
              +2
              Quote: AUL
              You yourself write that only the "swamp" really oppose this government, and the rest of the indignant sit on the priest exactly. And at the same time, you condemn them, the swamps. You will already decide on your attitude to the marsh, otherwise it is impossible to be a little pregnant!

              A colleague alicante11 does not support the ideology of the marshes, but the fact that they risked going to a rally "against".
              I hate the Germans for what they did in the USSR during the Second World War, but I respect the Germans as a strong and deadly enemy.
      3. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 19 January 2016 10: 39 New
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Can any of you suggest something better?

        It is at this moment that the best is dictatorship!
        Even if the dictator is Putin. The most severe observance of the law. The new repressive service (oprichna), subordinate to the dictator personally. The most severe control at all levels of government, the personal responsibility of officials. The dictatorship is 10 years. The nationalization of natural resources.
        A ban on the withdrawal of money abroad. Restriction (or prohibition) of the circulation and use of foreign currency in mutual settlements. State building structures for the construction of real affordable housing, for reasonable money, with a mortgage for 30 years at a minimum interest. People have nowhere to live stupidly (and not as an example, Moscow and the Moscow region).
        And mind not a word about the communists whom you Alexander do not like laughing
        Leaving everything as it is now, on the verge of war, is nothing to do. It is a betrayal. hi
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 19 January 2016 11: 40 New
          +2
          It is at this moment that the best is dictatorship!


          Pol Pot, Pinochet were also dictators, they brought nothing good to their countries. The point is not how to name the ruler, president, king, prime minister, secretary general, the main thing is that he defend popular interests, and not his own or a handful of oligarchs.
          1. BARKHAN
            BARKHAN 19 January 2016 17: 01 New
            +2
            Quote: alicante11
            It is at this moment that the best is dictatorship!


            Pol Pot, Pinochet were also dictators, they brought nothing good to their countries. The point is not how to name the ruler, president, king, prime minister, secretary general, the main thing is that he defend popular interests, and not his own or a handful of oligarchs.

            Dictatorship, I mean in the original sense of this concept, ancient Roman. And not the authoritarian regimes that you have listed.
            A dictator-leader appointed to office by the people, for a period of an emergency or war, endowed with extraordinary powers and power, with a limited tenure in this position. And in all the most difficult times, Rome resorted to this method and saved the empire. But, just liberalism and democracy and destroyed a centuries-old power ...
            Pol-Pot is of course an asshole, but not a dictator ... he is a despot and a tyrant. Because the dictator adheres to the laws.
            The attitude towards Pinochet in Chile itself is ambiguous ...
            But the facts! Power left himself. The population increased by 3,5 million people, from 10 to 13,5.
            And let's compare with Russia:
            1990-148,3 million
            2006-142,2 million
            2013-143,3 million
            the truth was raised with the annexation of Crimea and the massive distribution of citizenship to refugees ...
            2015 = 146,2 million
            So, that they have done democracy from the heart.
            1. alicante11
              alicante11 20 January 2016 04: 42 New
              +1
              Dictatorship, I mean in the original sense of this concept, ancient Roman. And not the authoritarian regimes that you have listed.


              Well, I’m not against dictatorship. I just say that a dictator should serve the people. And if a dictatorship is introduced in Russia now, then the dictator will serve the oligarchs who set him up. What will change?
              1. atalef
                atalef 20 January 2016 05: 49 New
                +1
                Quote: alicante11
                Dictatorship, I mean in the original sense of this concept, ancient Roman. And not the authoritarian regimes that you have listed.


                Well, I’m not against dictatorship. I just say that a dictator should serve the people. And if a dictatorship is introduced in Russia now, then the dictator will serve the oligarchs who set him up. What will change?

                A dictator should serve the people - an interesting pun
                1. alicante11
                  alicante11 20 January 2016 15: 07 New
                  0
                  A dictator should serve the people - an interesting pun


                  Otherwise, we will not see good luck. The question was about "caring for the people." If the dictator cares about himself or his beloved oligarchs, then will there really be "concern"?
          2. Alf
            Alf 20 January 2016 00: 01 New
            +2
            Quote: alicante11
            The point is not how to name the ruler, president, tsar, prime minister, general secretary, the main thing is that he defends the people's interests, and not his own or a handful of oligarchs.

            This is what socialism is called.
  4. ImPerts
    ImPerts 19 January 2016 06: 03 New
    +5
    I also voted for the Communists)))
    *****
    Whistles, whistles, infection, under the window,
    Well, there’s no Lyubka, why are you whistling?
    Freshly, in the dark, a cat fell from the roof,
    The trees bend, let the reeds rustle.
    Is something ominous such a night?
    Wandering lights on the graveyard
    On such a night, usually samurai
    Canal to the border by the river.

    The pipe burst, from the basement it smells of rot,
    The lover whistles for the third hour in a row.
    On such a night to make a fairy tale come true
    Winter was on a gop-stop brotherly taken.
    A drunken fly buzzing in a glass
    I sprinkled salt, it seems to be in trouble.
    On such a night, van Gogh cut off his ear,
    But Grozny cracked his son on the bastard.

    A fly went to the market and bought a samovar,
    Come, damn it, I'll treat you to beer!
    God damn it, he’s not low, not high,
    Hello paranoia, I'm your thin spikelet!

    The futurist is grumbling from the screen angry:
    "Alas, you people have been beating the clock!"
    A mixture of John, Nostradamus and Globa,
    Apocalypse scares, son of a bitch:
    "The Star of Wormwood will fall, devastation is coming,
    And brother will take his wife away from brother
    And Piglet will kill Winnie the Pooh.
    The end of an era, let’s all go down! "

    This is how you live, rowing money with a shovel,
    There’s a trumpet call - and all down the drain,
    Like, Last Judgment, call a lawyer,
    With little things to the exit, in full growth!
    And this one is whistling, on the tune of your Lyuba.
    lots of abandoned men!
    What is he to Hekuba, what is he to Hekuba?
    Would go, it’s better, squeezed acne.

    Bayu-bayushki-bayu, go to bed, your mother!
    Do you want, dear boy, will I sing a song?
    Tomorrow will be the day again
    at night, boy, you have to sleep.
    Come to us, Freddy Krueger,
    shake our baby!

    The sorrow is light, but there is no imperative
    What are you whistling, "Capital" is already written.
    Throwing tables out the window is, of course, ugly,
    But I will throw so that on the spot.
    The icteric moon is tormented by cirrhosis,
    Swings on a pipe Archangel Gabriel,
    And above is God tormented by the question:
    What the hell did he do all this?

    Distorted space, place, time,
    You will take homeless people at the entrance for the Magi:
    "Sholem Aleichem, how is the weather in Bethlehem?
    What do you need in the country of sleepless whistlers? "

    But who are you, masters of the night whistle?
    What power will stop you?
    I'm going to vote for the Communists -
    With them, at least at night
    With them, at least at night
    With them, at least at night
    Curfew.
    (c) Timur Shaov

    Most likely I will vote for them. I hope that Zyuganov will be removed from the posters.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 06: 23 New
      -13
      Quote: ImPerts

      Most likely I will vote for them. I hope that Zyuganov will be removed from the posters.

      I hope together with Zyuganov and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will be dispersed.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik 19 January 2016 06: 54 New
        20
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        I hope together with Zyuganov and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will be dispersed.

        Not serious, Alexander. They dispersed in Ukraine, so what? Better to live? Now, if the EP were dispersed ... With the landing of some members ...
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 07: 00 New
          -8
          Quote: EvgNik
          They dispersed in Ukraine, so what?

          And we are not Ukraine!
        2. dr. sem
          dr. sem 19 January 2016 07: 00 New
          +9
          It's time to clean the EP like after 1945 Germany. We need the de-URONization of Russia, with the defeat of all the people for 10-15 years in order to exclude these destructors from the life of the state and society.
          1. alicante11
            alicante11 19 January 2016 09: 19 New
            +3
            Well, well, and how do you propose doing this? In fact, for now, EDRosy can "strike at the rights" of anyone. And when EDRo cannot do this, then EDRosov will not remain in it. They will be in another party in power. After all, how many times has it been the FER, the Union of Right Forces, the Democratic People’s Democratic Republic, the OVR, and yet the people cannot understand how it does not matter what the party is called, the main thing it consists of.
            1. dr. sem
              dr. sem 19 January 2016 15: 08 New
              +1
              Pay attention to the expression "loss of rights" (personalized with a mark in the passport) and no matter where the former edros tries to infiltrate.
              1. alicante11
                alicante11 19 January 2016 15: 41 New
                +1
                Pay attention to the expression "loss of rights" (personalized with a mark in the passport) and no matter where the former edros tries to infiltrate.


                Yes, he did, I’m not against not only a loss of rights, but also a "reprimand with entry into the chest." I asked how you propose to arrange this.
                1. dr. sem
                  dr. sem 19 January 2016 19: 01 New
                  +1
                  Oprichnina from hard workers, state employees, farmers and small businesses. Like COMBEDS into collectivization.
                  1. alicante11
                    alicante11 20 January 2016 04: 38 New
                    +1
                    Oprichnina from hard workers, state employees, farmers and small businesses. Like COMBEDS into collectivization.


                    And if the kombedy raised their fists and middle peasants to the forks, then the kids came with a rifle and a red flag on the bayonet and wound the intestines against the will of the people on this bayonet. But here again officials sent them, and at what a high rank. And it’s pointless to drive the local small fry, they already do not eat too much.
  5. ava09
    ava09 19 January 2016 06: 07 New
    +6
    Another ambush awaits in modern "democratic elections" because there are no elections. This is for the lop-eared "communists", "democrats", "liberals" and anyone else. They only feed from one feeder. There is no other way, the bourgeois cannot take the risk and let the power take its course - what if the people screw up something?
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 19 January 2016 06: 30 New
      17
      Quote: ava09
      In modern "democratic elections" another ambush awaits because there are no elections
  6. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 19 January 2016 06: 11 New
    +6
    The fifth column has always been. They always looked to the west with sighing. To send them there only without money, let them appreciate its advantages.
    1. dr. sem
      dr. sem 19 January 2016 06: 29 New
      +6
      The Fifth Column cannot be "sent" to the West. Example. They exiled Trotsky so he shit from there. I had to fight. Because the GUARDIAN is needed. Only who will lead the business of CLEANING the country from the misbehavior ???
  7. Yarik
    Yarik 19 January 2016 06: 11 New
    +1
    Is it true that the prime minister appointed himself? wassat
  8. Shark Lover
    Shark Lover 19 January 2016 06: 11 New
    +2
    About the benefit on behalf of the prime minister. "A herd of rams led by a lion will always conquer a herd of lions led by a ram." While we are being won economically, or rather, we are losing. What other criteria for assessing the performance of any leader should be? The military-industrial complex, in my opinion, under the President, thank God, was removed from the dimych.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 January 2016 06: 30 New
      -2
      Quote: Shark Lover
      While we are being won economically, or rather, we are losing. What other criteria for assessing the performance of any leader should be?

      USSR November 1941, posts on the internet (how would it be)
      NIK XXX You understand that we are losing to the warrior!
      NICK LJJ Yes, it is clear that we are losing, because a flock of lions led by a ram cannot win.
      NIK RRR Yes, I agree with the Khan of Russia, everything is ok, the Germans will soon be in Moscow.
      NIK YUYU I heard that the Germans are already in Moscow.
      NICK AAA You are all stupid people!
      NIK XXX In pinned, listen to AAA, do you at least understand that this is the end. Our anti-Soviet government surrendered Ukraine and Belarus, the Germans are already in Moscow.
      NICK AAA Listen XXX go to **** Berlin.

      Everyone recognizes himself.
  9. Former
    Former 19 January 2016 06: 12 New
    14
    I shake your hand!
    Thank you, it's nice to know that I'm not the only one who thinks so.

    Believe it or not, I also had sketches of such an article, I still couldn’t finish it - there’s no time at home, and there is not always free time on watch.

    Himself the same "sofa strategist", like you, the length of service is really less, only 34 years.

    All labor activity is only in Production, he worked in various industries - mechanical engineering, energy, petrochemistry, oil, gas industry and of course in construction.
    So, just like you, I can rightfully be a "sofa strategist"

    And vote ...
    Alas, there is no one, here you are right - the "clearing" has been thoroughly cleaned.
    Probably only for "Uncle Zu", although I understand perfectly well that this is essentially a "pocket opposition", not those COMMUNISTS who went into hopeless attacks, not those who raised our Country from the ruins, created its industrial power.
    In the end, not such Communists as my mother, a simple district nurse, Her Heavenly Kingdom!

    And again, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
    I shake your hand firmly, God grant you health, good luck, happiness and many years!
    1. cap
      cap 19 January 2016 06: 36 New
      +6
      Quote: Former
      In the end, not such Communists as my mother, a simple district nurse, Her Heavenly Kingdom!

      And again, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
      I shake your hand firmly, God grant you health, good luck, happiness and many years!

      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      And let me remind you that clever Iosif Vissarionovich did his best: before the war he cleaned out the entire real “fifth column”.
      And for some reason, not a single minus article! The people are ripening ...

      The cons haven't woken up yet.
      And I subscribe to the author's opinion. In many ways, painful, for people like him, real hard workers and who have experienced everything that a person has in life. I wish you good health. Living in an era of change is difficult.
      History is a harsh judge, and ruthless. It will put everything in its place.
      I hope to see this in my life on earth.
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 19 January 2016 07: 45 New
      +3
      Quote: Former
      I shake your hand!
      Thank you, it's nice to know that I'm not the only one who thinks so.

      work experience is, however, less, only 34 years.


      ... special + for experience!
  10. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 19 January 2016 06: 14 New
    +7
    And let me remind you that clever Iosif Vissarionovich did his best: before the war he cleaned out the entire real “fifth column”.
    And for some reason, not a single minus article! The people are ripening ...
    1. Igor39
      Igor39 19 January 2016 06: 25 New
      +2
      In short, as I understand it, at the suggestion of Glazyev, it is necessary to print more money and shoot all suspects in connections with British intelligence, and everything will change at once laughing
      1. dr. sem
        dr. sem 19 January 2016 07: 02 New
        +4
        Understood perfectly, buddy. Exactly.
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 19 January 2016 07: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      And let me remind you that clever Iosif Vissarionovich did his best: before the war he cleaned out the entire real “fifth column”.
      And for some reason, not a single minus article! The people are ripening ...

      ... yes there are "they have them" ... by the time it ran up to 5! ...
    3. vladimir_krm
      vladimir_krm 19 January 2016 11: 22 New
      0
      Duc, if the IVS really had time to clean up the entire fifth column, then they would not have poisoned themselves, and the USSR would not have collapsed. Well, it is shortsighted to be indignant at the present times, believing all the enemy voices about the distribution of land and about the cleaning women from Gazprom ... The enemies are trying to achieve this ...
  11. Nix1986
    Nix1986 19 January 2016 06: 20 New
    +5
    Another statement of the obvious. The absence of any more or less serious systemic opposition, the overwhelming majority of the media are in one way or another controlled by the state. And as a result, there is no alternative to the current government, its course, and an impartial recognition of the fact that we will continue to depend on oil as well, since no one needs anything else. And any criticism of the government is regarded as a fifth column and a betrayal. Suffice it to recall the protests of the long-range fighters on Plato, people came out against the next cutting of money by the environment of the GDP, because the creators of the system could not clearly answer at a press conference where the money would go, and they were immediately announced through all channels as almost traitors to their homeland. In our central media, several issues are promoting the opening of some kind of family cheese factory as a breakthrough in import substitution, while abroad within the same period the apple electric car factory is already ready for commissioning, well, it's ridiculous to compare. They are so fond of hait everything abroad and how good our government is and the government is doing well, but something on any of the channels did not provide data at least for the price of a liter of gasoline in the "decaying" 15-35r asashay.
  12. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 19 January 2016 06: 21 New
    13
    "You rock the boat!" - So the first bells went off: pensioners in Sochi and Krasnodar expressed their phraseological unit to the "social" state!
  13. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 19 January 2016 06: 29 New
    +8
    Didn't expect such an article here. In principle, I agree with the author.
  14. Jarilo
    Jarilo 19 January 2016 06: 32 New
    +8
    Mr. Gref called our country a loser here. How much further! And he and his fellow comrades seem to have nothing to do with it.

    They are at the helm and at the same time have nothing to do with it, in other words, they are at the helm working for themselves, and not in the interests of the country, I cannot explain it in another way.
  15. Neko75
    Neko75 19 January 2016 06: 33 New
    +4
    Really no one understood? Economic elites rule, not politicians ... Elections are a purely nominal option for the people. Politics is an instrument of elites. And not only in Russia so, so around the world! It’s just that the elites have calmed down over the 300 years and create a certain balance in society, called the standard of living, and only in the 91 of the year everything started to spin ... Everything is still in the stabilization stage and whoever is in power should not expect any sharp turn .
  16. parusnik
    parusnik 19 January 2016 06: 33 New
    +4
    We have long been presented with a choice of two evils to choose the lesser .. unfortunately ..
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 19 January 2016 07: 56 New
      +4
      Quote: parusnik
      We have long been presented with a choice of two evils to choose the lesser .. unfortunately ..

      Maybe it's better not to choose evil (any - big or small)?
  17. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 January 2016 06: 47 New
    +2
    Quote: Mera Joota
    constant change of power

    That makes it possible for this government to do nothing at all, referring first to its predecessor, and then say that there was not enough time. Therefore, horseradish radish is not sweeter.
  18. Zomanus
    Zomanus 19 January 2016 06: 50 New
    +5
    We now have a peacetime government.
    If anyone managed to command in the army,
    he knows the value of people who know how to give orders.
    Clear orders, during the implementation of which the necessary results are achieved.
    And for this you need to clearly understand yourself what we want to achieve.
    We have people in the government who clearly understand
    what do we want to achieve? Can these people give the right orders
    and monitor their implementation?
    So I think that we don’t have such people yet.
    And when such people appear, then we can talk about
    the heyday of the state.
    In the meantime, the people above us are simply protecting their clearing with nishtyaks,
    not really caring for those who live in this clearing.
    1. alicante11
      alicante11 19 January 2016 09: 35 New
      +3
      And for this you need to clearly understand yourself what we want to achieve.
      We have people in the government who clearly understand


      There is, but not “we” want to achieve, but “they”, that is, the oligarchs. They want to join the world economy, but not in the form of food for transnational corporations, but in the form of equals, to become transnational corporations themselves in order to allocate them an oil industry for “feeding”. The rest is all derivatives, simply because they are not accepted, there places have been staked for a hundred years ahead.


      Can these people give the right orders
      and monitor their implementation?


      They can, if it was necessary to take Crimea, then they gave the order and took it. It was necessary to plant Khodor, they gave the order and put him in, it was necessary to expel the BAB from the country, they expelled him, it was necessary to bomb the terrorist bomb in Syria - we are bombing. It was necessary to pacify Chechnya - Kadyrov became the main infantryman of GDP. They know all this, but only when it is NECESSARY for them.

      In the meantime, the people above us are simply protecting their clearing with nishtyaks,
      not really caring for those who live in this clearing.


      Sorry, but you have a mess in your head. If they “just protect” their clearing, then they are ALREADY strong. So they can already. But they don’t want to “take care”. They can (and the beginning of 2000's are in this bail), but they do not want to. Like, that's enough, we have already taken care of you, it’s time and honor to know, the sheikhs have yachts longer than ours, we must catch up.
  19. bear
    bear 19 January 2016 06: 51 New
    +8
    Oh, how missing Comrade Stalin.
  20. b wassil
    b wassil 19 January 2016 07: 01 New
    +6
    Life forces you to be dissatisfied with the internal politics of Ed. Ross: It is high time for Zyuganov to give way to a younger and more energetic leader.
  21. sa-ag
    sa-ag 19 January 2016 07: 02 New
    +6
    "... China and South Korea will sell any production"
    They will not sell, the finished product please, and then mass use, but something dual-use is doubtful

    "... But, probably, I will vote for the communists, although I feel sick from Zyuganov."

    To vote, I think, follows the idea, and not for the representative of any party, well, this very representative looks advantageous, but what does he offer?
    1. Per se.
      Per se. 19 January 2016 08: 24 New
      +9
      Quote: sa-ag
      Vote, I think, follows the idea

      "- die! Why don't you die?
      “Because there is more to this mask than flesh.” Underneath is an idea, and ideas are immortal
      ".

      "The people should not be afraid of their government. This government must fear its people".

      Quotes from the movie "V for Vendetta". So what is our idea? So far, only one thing is clear that Russia and its people deserve the best. Personally, I am also not enthusiastic about Gennady Andreyevich, but the Communists have an idea that is closer to me than a consumer society, with a cult of money and selfish morality. Another question is how and who this idea can be defended and promoted by the current “adapted” communists for the benefit of the people.
      1. alicante11
        alicante11 19 January 2016 08: 36 New
        +2
        The only hope is that after eating all of the above, I’d like more,


        That's just a long time ago in the Communist Party this idea does not even smell. Just a petty-bourgeois party that feeds on the brand that grabbed, like others grabbed the other legacy of the Union.
  22. Mera joota
    Mera joota 19 January 2016 07: 04 New
    +1
    To understand why we have it this way, and not otherwise, it is necessary to take the main postulate as a basis:
    Rogues, power-hungry, thieves, loafers and other scum, as well as naive idealists, are thrown into the delight of the rod.
    Everywhere, absolutely in all countries, on all continents, regardless of the social structure. In this regard, there is corruption absolutely everywhere and officials are trying to breed in incredible numbers absolutely everywhere. The only difference is in the level of what all this has achieved. Where society controls the process, the effectiveness of the bureaucratic apparatus is high, where there is no control, Russia or the DPRK comes. The bureaucratic apparatus is trying with all its might to get rid of the control of society and for the sake of this goes to everything, including crimes.

    The author proposes to return to the path already traversed without realizing that it is a dead end. Then the control of society was replaced by the control of the party and the leader. The leader sent the punitive organs to clean up the party, not allowing the latter to "stagnate" and cleaned the punitive organs so that they would not merge with the cleaned ones. This could not end with anything good, because in the end the leader would have been eaten purely out of a sense of self-preservation. The departure of the leader naturally led to the fact that the bureaucratic and party apparatus grew together, and the loss of control over officials led to the decline of the country.

    Why the author is not satisfied with the option with the control of officials by society as it is carried out in prosperous countries is not entirely clear, it is probably easier for him to live in the past.
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 19 January 2016 07: 31 New
      +1
      Quote: Mera Joota
      Why the author is not satisfied with the option with the control of officials by society

      there may be an established mentality, so to speak, vertically oriented, a pattern of thinking - like "up there they know what they are doing." An official, this is, so to speak, an unstable part of the system, instead of a clear execution, according to the job description, he has all sorts of fantasies of improving his existence, at the expense of the resources of his position, is not optimal. The official should be replaced with a computer with its formal logic.
      1. Mera joota
        Mera joota 19 January 2016 10: 32 New
        0
        Quote: sa-ag
        there may be an established mentality, so to speak, vertically oriented, a pattern of thinking - like "up there they know what they are doing."

        And what has the mentality to do with it? Take Georgia, who has corruption in their blood, but they broke it. Or Singapore, the Chinese have corruption not just in their blood, it is in every cell, wild tribes still roamed on the territory of Russia, and there was already corruption in China. But broke the same mentality through the knee and nothing, live.
    2. alicante11
      alicante11 19 January 2016 09: 00 New
      +2
      What the author does not like about the option with the control of officials by society as it is carried out in prosperous countries


      Can specific examples of such “prosperous” countries be possible? And then everywhere you look, crises, refugees, or terrorists.

      And HOW do you imagine the “control of officials by society”? Well, I know that this Chubais is a thief, and you know, and millions know. This is called "public scrutiny." But is Anatoly Borisovich getting worse from this? It is unlikely, judging by its flowering appearance.
      In order for society to be able to exercise control, a mechanism is needed that will implement the results of this control. And he can take the thief by the ear and the sun. And this is the power apparatus, which is controlled by the same officials. Alles, the circle has closed.
      Or do you seriously think that you can “control” officials in Ukraine? Garbage lustration?
      1. Mera joota
        Mera joota 19 January 2016 10: 28 New
        0
        Quote: alicante11
        And HOW do you imagine the "control of officials by society"?

        Well, if you don't know the basics ...
        The meaning of the turnover of officials is not that they should not be an eyesore, but that the formation of a criminal community based on family / friendship / sexually oriented ties does not occur. This is the main mechanism for controlling the bureaucratic apparatus by society. In such a society, Chubais is simply impossible.
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 19 January 2016 11: 48 New
          +2
          Well, if you don’t know the basics ..


          Forgive our grayness.

          The meaning of the shift of officials is not to not be an eyesore, but to prevent the formation of a criminal community based on kinship / friendship / sexually oriented relationships. This is the main mechanism of public control of the bureaucracy.


          And now the basics of how to organize a PEOPLE without oversight bodies so that an official could not drag his son, mother-in-law, mistress to duty and form a "criminal community". Yes, he will send you to mom, because he is an official and does not obey you, and you do not have methods of influencing him. Impact on conscience not to offer. There are very, very few people who do not suit their relative in a warm place.
    3. Wheel
      Wheel 20 January 2016 00: 44 New
      +2
      Quote: Mera Joota
      Why the author is not satisfied with the option with the control of officials by society as it is carried out in prosperous countries is not entirely clear

      Wow!
      Where is this community like this to take and control officials?
      Here are all straight, along and across, diagonally and along the perimeter.
      Prymer in the studio!

      PS To what extent people have been brainwashed, they cannot think at all, and they don’t want to ...
  23. George 275
    George 275 19 January 2016 07: 10 New
    +1
    What kind of system does not put the oligarchs, kamunists, emperors in power if there is no responsibility at the legislative level without a limitation period in a leading position, everything else is meaningless. To know what will be asked and in a hundred years everything would fall into place for work.
  24. Micross
    Micross 19 January 2016 07: 13 New
    +2
    I'm going to vote for the Air Defense Party !!!
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. mpzss
    mpzss 19 January 2016 07: 45 New
    +2
    Dear author, tell me, where were you in the 1990 year when the referendum was held, that the Russian Federation needed its president (then the USSR was still)? What did you vote for then?
    For example, I now remember how the company drove us to this referendum (I served then), how he explained to us with foam at the mouth that we NEED YOUR president, so we all voted FOR! Now I don’t know myself whether I voted correctly or not, but I definitely didn’t want Gorbachev at that moment, I just saw that with this perestroika everything was getting worse and worse, by then the euphoria from the perestroika had already passed!
    Therefore, remember what happened under Gorbachev, as he practically did EVERYTHING to destroy the Union!
    I always said and will say:
    YES, I HAVE MUCH, VERY MUCH QUESTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT AND THE GOVERNMENT, BUT I WILL NEVER, I REPEAT, NEVER WILL THERE ANYTHING WHILE DIRTING WITH THE MILK !!!!!!!!!!!
    I don’t remember who said this and I won’t be able to repeat it for sure, but the point is that every nation has the government that it deserves!
    Well, whoever doesn’t like it, for God's sake, there are many other countries where you can live!
  27. Former
    Former 19 January 2016 07: 47 New
    12
    Quote: sa-ag
    "...

    "... But, probably, I will vote for the communists, although I feel sick from Zyuganov."

    To vote, I think, follows the idea, and not for the representative of any party, well, this very representative looks advantageous, but what does he offer?


    In 2012, he voted specifically for the candidate from the Communists.
    In general, there is about this in a book I wrote in 2013, so this is not a bunch of flour.

    Voted for a simple reason - well, not for Putin or Prokhorov to vote, the same?
    And, of course, not for the "pocket clown" of the current government - Zhirinovsky.

    The trouble is that "IDEAS" as such are not offered by any of the available parties.
    Zhirinovsky has something more or less common sense, but even the most SANE idea can be presented in such a way that it will only cause laughter.

    In general, the "task" of Zhirinovsky and the Liberal Democratic Party (as well as the rest of the "parties", in fact "pocket") is to "work" for the current government.

    We need some new idea, understandable and close to the majority (I understand, in the current situation this is doggy nonsense, but why not dream)
    What an idea?
    Probably a kind of "mix" of communist and God forgive me, liberal ideas.
    What can I say in vain?

    We need a Leader of the Nation like Stalin, we need such "anti-crisis managers" like Beria.
    Well, ministers need not former smugglers, such as Dimon, but those who worked in production, those who built their business from scratch.

    It somehow sounded here:
    -A propose someone to "power".
    I can name at least 3 people, production workers, excellent economists. I can name at least 2 people who have made a business from scratch.

    I think everyone knows such people.
    But they don't have a move to power, as they said, "the clearing has been cleaned up," no one will give up power peacefully.

    So in the fall I will again vote for the Communists, just so as not to vote for the United Russia and other shnyaga.
    Of course, I perfectly understand that my vote will not solve anything
    -The same will remain in power, but let me express my protest against all this ...

    Well, as for the comment that during the Second World War there would be comments that "Stalin leaked" ...
    Excuse me, old fool, I don't think so!

    World War II Internet (fantasy)
    - Men, how to get to the front, I'm only 16?
    - I know one pepper, he corrected my passport, tomorrow I'm leaving for the front, write in HP.
    - Guys, dad went to the front, I stood up for him to the turning DIP, can you tell me how to fill the cutters?
    - Men, today we took the height, we run out of ammunition, but we will stand to the end!

    That would be something like that on the Internet if he were 41!
    For motherland for Stalin!
    For our Motherland, which gave wings to the boys from the provinces, for the Motherland for which the welfare and self-realization of each Citizen were not just lines in the Constitution!

    And you don't need to poke "Holodomor", "GULAG" and others in my face!
    The genocide of the Soviet people during the years of damned "perestroika", believe me, no less!

    By the way, all my relatives were dispossessed, and my grandmother's brother was in the GULAG (he was a horse thief), a holder of the Order of Glory, a scout:
    http://podvignaroda.mil.ru/?#id=39377127&tab=navDetailManAward
    But none of them cursed Stalin, I answer!
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 19 January 2016 08: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: Former
      Probably a kind of "mix" of communist and God forgive me, liberal ideas.

      Well, something like this, the next generation of the idea
    2. alicante11
      alicante11 19 January 2016 09: 45 New
      -2
      Well, ministers need not former smugglers, such as Dimon, but those who worked in production, those who built their business from scratch.


      Those. not former, but acting farmers?

      I can name at least 2 people who have done business from scratch.


      And I can do more, but, excuse me, into their power? Better oligarchs and bureaucrats of GDP. These have at least gotten drunk, so are fed a billion. And these will begin such a “redistribution” that the 90s will seem like a New Year's morning party in kindergarten. Only an absolutely unprincipled and very greedy person can be successful in business. Only such people develop there. Others may survive, but how long they survive will not even depend on them. In the meantime, they will not fall into a specific corruption scheme with officials or large owners, or some of them will not put their eyes on their business.
  28. mpzss
    mpzss 19 January 2016 07: 52 New
    -7
    Beryniya-crisis manager !!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have not heard such an interpretation of his actions!
    Brad!
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 19 January 2016 08: 52 New
      10
      So, Beria was one of those "managers" who could set a task, provide and demand execution!
      And all the stories about him are liberal nonsense.
  29. Leader
    Leader 19 January 2016 09: 02 New
    +4
    I despise the current deputies and the government.
    I don’t go to elections - I don’t see the point with such laws.
    He does not intend to defend the oligarchs and their wealth.
    Long live the revolution! Death to the bourgeoisie!
  30. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 19 January 2016 09: 04 New
    +2
    All calls for each of us to participate in changes are empty. To go the parliamentary way? There, the clearing was cleared specifically. All parties and leaders are fed. Grandpa Ziu has long been resting in laurels, and the idea there is outdated. It needs to be finalized and adjusted to the existing realities. Opposition? Well, it's not Navalny to choose. Take to the streets? Maidan is an example for you. And according to the law on rallies and demonstrations, you probably know the order, how everything is carried out. A little threat, and the government will ban the event under any far-fetched pretext. And everything that is not according to the law will be severely crushed. So everything is sterile in the political arena. The elite have taken care of their stability in advance.
  31. Stinger
    Stinger 19 January 2016 09: 09 New
    +4
    The article is good. But hoping for an "election" is ridiculous. There are only aces in the deck with eyes burning with greed.
  32. puppet
    puppet 19 January 2016 09: 52 New
    +1
    Everyone, of course, has their own right to see the glass half empty or full.
    But maybe someone will name at least one year in the entire centuries-old history of Russia, when everyone was good and everywhere there was only continuous benefit (everyone eats enough, works no more than 8 hours a day, child, serf and hard labor is not used, no war, no political prisoners, freedom of conscience, assembly, etc., while the economy grows and we do not import bread)?
    Maybe you need to vote for Schengen right away? in some countries they still believe that all this is there ...
    1. dr. sem
      dr. sem 19 January 2016 13: 00 New
      +2
      Not a year, but years. 1970s-early 1980s (up to Gorbato). The same stagnation. Which liberals vilify as they want. Find the numbers yourself ...
      1. puppet
        puppet 19 January 2016 17: 56 New
        -1
        those. Would you vote for Brezhnev?

        I also really like the 70s-80s, but, unfortunately, this was the beginning of the end: by 1970 we had been importing bread for 7 years, what do you think is economic growth?
        There is no free well-being, in the 70s and 80s everyone was eaten and hello :(.
        I am not making excuses for anyone, but when Gorbachev came, there was no need to deliberately ruin something, you could simply "not heal" or slightly push.
  33. daomsk
    daomsk 19 January 2016 10: 02 New
    +2
    But I used to always go to the polls ... True, I always voted for the all-Russian clown, knowing for sure that he would never be elected! - after all, there was no column "against all".
    I went to along the way (well, or mostly?) To buy food, drink beer and talk with old acquaintances, whom I meet mainly only at elections.
    And I will not go to the elections this year. As it was written here correctly, there is no choice at all as such. I would have gone to vote for the Communists, for old memory, but it hurts something that Uncle Ziu is not cute ...
    To vote for pediros means not respecting oneself or one's children and grandchildren. A passless nightmare of some sort.
    But the anniversary of the February Revolution and the October Revolution, together with the birthdays of Lenin and Stalin, I will definitely mark.
    Who will tell us what to do now? How to save the remnants of Russia, how to ensure a decent life for all of us ?! I don't see anyone on the horizon. Or maybe they are not shown on purpose or spread rot, according to the good old Russian tradition. I do not know. How to live further, what to do ...
  34. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 19 January 2016 10: 05 New
    +3
    And I liked the article and the comments, by the way, in the morning they are all so practically cultural, no one sends or insults anyone, the conclusion arises that there are pensioners online. But this is so by the way, let me speak about the elections. I agree with the absolute majority about the political structure of our country, but somewhat disagree in assessing the uselessness of the elections, especially in the current economic environment. I believe that the elections are the same protest action by the population as an exit to Bolotnaya, only on legal grounds, which the authorities can neither suppress nor prohibit. And the full-scale dissatisfaction with the current ruling party expressed at the elections in any case will force the authorities to take at least some measures, at least to prevent a social explosion in the country, in the current situation this may entail processes uncontrolled by the authorities, which is also not an option for the authorities , while there is something to squeeze out of the country, none of those who held power will not allow its collapse.
    Something like that, subjective opinion, colleagues. hi
  35. electrooleg
    electrooleg 19 January 2016 10: 15 New
    +1
    Why does the author ask the reason for voting for United Russia, if fair elections do not exist? As a result of fair elections, Hitler comes to power. Already checked. The global community can no longer afford this. Therefore, vote for anyone, the result will be what you need.
  36. Million
    Million 19 January 2016 10: 21 New
    +3
    But our economic bloc (forgive me, Lord, for the expression) is waiting for investments ... from enemies.

    Yes, Medvedev, who is respected by many here, said so: we need investments !!! I just can't understand why Putin still allows him to work ...
  37. Cobra77
    Cobra77 19 January 2016 10: 21 New
    +7
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: EvgNik
    They dispersed in Ukraine, so what?

    And we are not Ukraine!


    What is the difference with Ukraine? Do you have ICBMs and bigger territories? The oligarchy is exactly the same, only it is more stable and almost does not squabble among themselves, we agreed. The stratification of society is no less, if not more.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 19 January 2016 10: 31 New
      +6
      Quote: cobra77
      Stratification of society no less

      That's it ! Any unforeseen step by the government can blaze so that the Kiev Maidan seems like a childish prank.
      1. alicante11
        alicante11 19 January 2016 11: 54 New
        +3
        That's it ! Any unforeseen step by the government can blaze so that the Kiev Maidan seems like a childish prank.


        I beg you, the golden eagle practically dispersed the maydauns before the Yanuka flees. Cast aside to the Maidan. But there was no order for stripping. And our hand does not flinch to give such an order to the riot police. Then, that Russia is not an under-state of Ukraine. And politicians now serve the masters of Russia - the oligarchs. They serve and protect and therefore the hand does not flinch.
  38. Cobra77
    Cobra77 19 January 2016 10: 23 New
    +4
    Quote: mpzss
    Beryniya-crisis manager !!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have not heard such an interpretation of his actions!
    Brad!


    Delirium in your head. If there are facts refuting the statement - voice it, otherwise just throw on the valve.
  39. Cobra77
    Cobra77 19 January 2016 10: 35 New
    +5
    Quote: Igor39
    In short, as I understand it, at the suggestion of Glazyev, it is necessary to print more money and shoot all suspects in connections with British intelligence, and everything will change at once laughing


    No that you! It is necessary to reduce pensions, and it is better to abolish, still introduce the Rotenberg law, build at least another 5-6 Yeltsin centers, increase excise taxes on diesel. fuel twice as much because everyone travels a lot, the roads are broken, to make education and medicine completely paid, to privatize Russian Railways by 100%, well, something else to taste ...
    And the main thing is to intensively educate the "literate consumer" because the people got some kind of crappy ....
  40. Cobra77
    Cobra77 19 January 2016 10: 48 New
    +3
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: cobra77
    Stratification of society no less

    That's it ! Any unforeseen step by the government can blaze so that the Kiev Maidan seems like a childish prank.


    It will also blaze if it does not blaze because the people want it. And because our "elitists" have something to lose and for this they will gnaw anyone with their teeth, in any way, as it was in 17 year. But I'm afraid it's better to blaze a little and try to get out of the swamp than to drown in that swamp. The same 17 year, although it brought a lot of blood and dirt, but the result paid for everything. From an agrarian country with constant hunger among peasants, an industrial power turned out with the best social guarantees for people that were on the globe then.
  41. The comment was deleted.
  42. karevik
    karevik 19 January 2016 11: 59 New
    +4
    I support every word of the author. It's a pity that he is only ashamed to name himself completely. That means he is afraid of our power.
    To drive Medvedev and almost his entire team with a filthy broom, but alas! Vladimir Vladimirovich openly gave them carte blanche stating
    that he does not abandon his own! Who are we then? So a handful of boyars next to him are our own, and we are a people who are in themselves, a gray mass with which you can not reckon! The main thing is ours! And they will be the first to hand it over only the Americans promise not to touch them!
    As long as all this will last, as long as! And Mr. President? You, you are to blame for everything Medvedev, dvorkovichi, Golikov, Chubais are closer to you than we are!
    By the way, I propose another abbreviation SMERCH (Judge the Ugly Chubais or Judge the Measures of the Officials). Stalin had SMERSH!
  43. Ros 56
    Ros 56 19 January 2016 13: 01 New
    +2
    Actually, we need to close this freak show, called the economic bloc in our government, and at the same time appoint a sensible prime minister. Well, as long as possible, a crowd of fortune-tellers has gathered, and they are guessing with a crash, not a crash. And where was our smart guy G. Gref, when he was in charge of the Ministry of Economic Development, why didn't he fit into the leaders of the world economy? So it turns out who our downshifter is, even Ulyukaev's fault is less than his.
    We want to survive, we need to make serious decisions, especially in relation to the commodity companies with state participation and in relation to managers to limit income. Deal with storytellers for fuel prices. Is it really incomprehensible to these "wise men", expensive energy - there is no development. Stop taking money out of the country, you haven't earned it.
  44. Ebundey Mukhryuev
    Ebundey Mukhryuev 19 January 2016 16: 43 New
    +1
    In the next elections, not even the Communists, but the Bolsheviks will come to power, and already in the detention center, members of the current government will tell tales of how all citizens under their rule only thought about where it would be better to relax in Egypt, Turkey or the Maldives. So tryndets will come to them, "caring" about the good of the people!
  45. Cobra77
    Cobra77 19 January 2016 19: 04 New
    +4
    Quote: Ebundey Mukhryuyev
    In the next elections, not even the Communists, but the Bolsheviks will come to power, and already in the detention center, members of the current government will tell tales of how all citizens under their rule only thought about where it would be better to relax in Egypt, Turkey or the Maldives. So tryndets will come to them, "caring" about the good of the people!


    There is one point. The Bolsheviks cannot come to power in the elections. For to paraphrase Lenin - there is no such party (the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is not a communist party by definition, they are socialists and nothing more). Secondly, the administrative resource and the media will do their job and choose EdRo again. Bolsheviks and communists can come to power only as a result of revolution. There are no other ways. For they are the most terrible evil for both the feudal lord and the capitalist. For a capitalist, even fierce Nazism is better than communism.
  46. Severok
    Severok 19 January 2016 22: 43 New
    +3
    E-mine ... As the author removed from the language !!! Already I go to the elections and fundamentally spoil, it is the paper that is called the vomit word. So that no sknip can use it, and in general, for more than 15 years there is no one on the lists for whom you could raise your hand!
  47. berdnik
    berdnik 20 January 2016 15: 51 New
    0
    haven't we got enough of the revolutions of the last century?
    1. dr. sem
      dr. sem 20 January 2016 16: 11 New
      +1
      Looks like NOT FOOD. So far, our elite is making nests in the West from the revolutions of the Russian Federation.
      In Hochland, the local Yanukovych elite played out ... Everyone was happy for many years.