Military Review

Navy: the regiment of pilots MiG-29K for "Admiral Kuznetsov" almost formed

66
The regiment of pilots MiG-29 for service on the "Admiral Kuznetsov" formed and this year will begin to carry out flights, passes RIA News message to the chief of the maritime aviation Russian fleet Igor Kozhin.


Navy: the regiment of pilots MiG-29K for "Admiral Kuznetsov" almost formed


“MiG-29K is a modern machine, a very large scientific potential is realized there. Having received these cars, we received new high-quality armament. The task now is to introduce his landing on the deck as soon as possible, to prepare the flight crew. The regiment, which will be engaged on these aircraft, we actually completed. The task is already this year to enter combat service on the aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov" - this is very important. This is the main task of 2016 of the year, and I think we can handle it, ”said the Major General.

Help Agency: “From April to August 2015, the heavy aircraft carrier cruiser (TAVKR) of the Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov underwent a dock repair at the 82-m shipyard in Roslyakovo, Murmansk region. During the time spent in the dock on the "Admiral Kuznetsov" a large amount of technical work was carried out. After repairs at the regular parking in Murmansk, the cruiser was restored to full combat readiness. In November, the ship conducted an air defense exercise in the Barents Sea. ”
Photos used:
RIA News. Dmitry Korobeynikov
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 15 January 2016 11: 30 New
    +3
    It remains only to do Kuznetsov and then everything will be fine.
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 15 January 2016 11: 32 New
      0
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      It remains only to do Kuznetsov and then everything will be fine.

      And what's wrong with him? Enlighten, be kind.
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 15 January 2016 11: 36 New
        14
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And what's wrong with him? Enlighten, be kind.

        If you dig deep - something is wrong with him from birth - and not a cruiser or an aircraft carrier, but at least he is.
        1. Idiot
          Idiot 15 January 2016 12: 25 New
          14
          The ships of the Krechet project were originally built as anti-submarine. Actually, the main task of our fleet was to defend for some time the water of the deployment of the SSBNs, in order to enable them to shoot at targets and not be immediately destroyed by the enemy. Nobody ever set the fleet the task of destroying the enemy’s ACG, an equivalent and prolonged confrontation with them.
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 15 January 2016 12: 51 New
            +3
            Ships of the Krechet project were originally built as anti-submarine

            So the fact of the matter is that it was not necessary to try to make a missile cruiser aircraft carrier from an anti-submarine helicopter carrier hi
        2. Idiot
          Idiot 15 January 2016 12: 25 New
          0
          The ships of the Krechet project were originally built as anti-submarine. Actually, the main task of our fleet was to defend for some time the water of the deployment of the SSBNs, in order to enable them to shoot at targets and not be immediately destroyed by the enemy. Nobody ever set the fleet the task of destroying the enemy’s ACG, an equivalent and prolonged confrontation with them.
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock 15 January 2016 12: 46 New
            +4
            Quote: pft, fkb
            Ships of the Krechet project were originally built as anti-submarine

            This was an interim decision in anticipation of the aircraft carriers of the Ulyanovsk project (project 1143.7.), They began to build Ulyanovsk at the Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant in 1988, but in 1992 they stopped building and dismantled it on a slipway due to lack of funding. Although, by that time, structures with a total weight of about 27 tons had already been installed, and the readiness was brought up to 000 percent.
      2. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 15 January 2016 11: 39 New
        10
        Well, if the ship is constantly under repair, then obviously something is not right.
      3. Engineer
        Engineer 15 January 2016 11: 39 New
        10
        His Achilles' heel is a boiler turbine power plant, therefore, he does not go hiking without tugboats.
        1. guzik007
          guzik007 15 January 2016 13: 04 New
          +6
          therefore, he does not go hiking without tugboats.
          ----------------------------------------
          And without a tanker with fuel oil))
      4. gispanec
        gispanec 15 January 2016 11: 50 New
        +4
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And what's wrong with him? Enlighten, be kind.

        yes the boilers constantly junk ...
      5. Wiruz
        Wiruz 15 January 2016 12: 47 New
        +3
        And what's wrong with him? Enlighten, be kind.

        Kuznetsov’s problems and minuses can be discussed for a long time. Everything went wrong with the design. As a result, we have an aircraft carrier, as it were ... but it copes with the tasks of an aircraft carrier so-so ... It’s good that they at least started updating the composition of the aircraft wing, otherwise the Su-33 can only work through the air, and even then it’s not at full load hi
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. mitrich
          mitrich 15 January 2016 13: 54 New
          0
          .... and then the Su-33 can only work through the air, and even then not at full load

          So, like, Mig-29 is also a fighter, with the main specifics of the air .. what
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 15 January 2016 14: 11 New
            +5
            So, like, Mig-29 is also a fighter, with the main specifics of the air ..

            Do not confuse the MiG-29K the times with the MiG-29K by today's. The current Mikoyan-Gurevich car is well trained to work on the ground.
      6. Odysseus
        Odysseus 15 January 2016 14: 09 New
        0
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And what's wrong with him? Enlighten, be kind.

        It needs average repair with modernization. In its current form it is not operational.
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 15 January 2016 11: 34 New
      +5
      A little copy-paste with "Made with us" -
      On December 1, 2015, the Russian Navy formed the second (after the 279th) separate naval fighter aviation regiment, which received the 100th number in honor of the first naval aviation fighter naval regiment of the USSR Navy, which existed in Crimea from 1986 to 1992 .
      The new 100th separate naval fighter aviation regiment was formed at the 859th Center for Combat Use and Retraining of the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy in Yeysk and received 24 new MiG-29K / KUB fighter aircraft as a material part.
      1. makst83
        makst83 15 January 2016 11: 42 New
        12
        Och, it’s sad that Timur Avtandilovich Apakidze did not live to name the regiment in his honor, because his merit is the preservation of carrier-based aviation soldier
        Py.Sy. Strongly good news, keep it up!
        Py.Sy.2 All the publications shout about the supplied “dryers”, but the silence about deck MiGs is strange, however.
      2. Taoist
        Taoist 15 January 2016 13: 16 New
        +6
        I started the service at 100 at Apakidze. Just formed. We were then in Ochakovo. In Saki, just a strip was being repaired. Just retraining on 29K conducted. True, not for long, then some came to their senses and threw vertical lines on specialization
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 15 January 2016 11: 58 New
      +7
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      It remains only to do Kuznetsov and then everything will be fine.

      Yes, actually it’s respected, it’s been done a long time ago. Construction began on September 1, 1982
      Launched on December 4 1985 of the year
      Commissioned 20 January 1991 year
      Status In the fleet
    4. little girl15
      little girl15 15 January 2016 12: 08 New
      +1
      All the same, the good news! There is practically an aviation regiment, only Kuznetsova is left to wait for repairs.
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 15 January 2016 12: 22 New
        12
        "Heavy aircraft carrier cruiser (TAVKR)" Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov "from May to August 2015 underwent dock repair at the 82nd shipyard in Roslyakovo, Murmansk region. While in the dock at the Admiral Kuznetsov, a large amount of technical work was carried out. After repair at the standard parking lot in Murmansk, the cruiser was restored to full combat readiness. In November, the ship conducted air defense exercises in the Barents Sea. ”

        Yes, he went out of repair, went out. You then carefully read the article.
    5. Wiruz
      Wiruz 15 January 2016 12: 43 New
      0
      Though here RVV-SD flashed winked
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 15 January 2016 14: 37 New
        +2
        Quote: Wiruz
        Though here RVV-SD flashed

        So at exhibitions and shows, they often flicker. But the pictures with them in combat units must still be very searched ...
  2. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 15 January 2016 11: 32 New
    +7
    To the statement: “born to crawl - cannot fly” in flight schools they answer: “I would be able to crawl, we will teach how to fly”. So it is here. The regiment has been formed, the goal has been set, which means it will be taught to fly from an aircraft carrier.
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 15 January 2016 12: 05 New
      0
      Putin correctly said who should be - and so get it. But sometimes it is necessary to demonstrate a flag, if necessary, to scare someone, for this purpose TAKR "with retinue" is needed. Nuclear-powered missile carriers are more efficient, not fat today. This is probably our last aircraft carrier. Although handsome, but we must go forward.
  3. gray_angel
    gray_angel 15 January 2016 11: 33 New
    0
    it would be nice to use it in Syria, military practice would be very useful
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 15 January 2016 11: 40 New
      0
      So it means “KUZYA” “Varyag” will soon change from duty. Such articles reveal the secret plans of the General Staff.
    2. podpolkovnik
      podpolkovnik 15 January 2016 12: 02 New
      +1
      Quote: gray_angel
      it would be nice to use it in Syria, military practice would be very useful

      He has nothing to do there yet ...
      While landing-ups in the "real" work out, combat coordination, etc., etc. ...
      It is better to do it in calm conditions.
      But not like the Syrian coast.
  4. newcomer
    newcomer 15 January 2016 11: 34 New
    +4
    Chicnach news. finally, the blacksmiths will walk with a full wing, given su33 and mig29 which were + regiment mig29k. this makes me happy. the Yankees tensed.
    1. looker-on
      looker-on 15 January 2016 12: 08 New
      +4
      Do they lie tensed but the news pleases
    2. sisa29
      sisa29 15 January 2016 16: 12 New
      +1
      Yes, yes, they tensed ... now they will probably put up the offer, excuse me, they were wrong where we will now say against you.
  5. Ros 56
    Ros 56 15 January 2016 11: 34 New
    +1
    How to do if it is already done. Take a look.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 15 January 2016 12: 17 New
      +4
      Quote: Ros 56
      How to do if it is already done. Take a look.

      Judging by the catapults and the Yak-44 on the take-off deck, this is the Ulyanovsk ATAVKR cut to metal at 25% readiness in Nikolaev ...
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 15 January 2016 12: 39 New
        0
        You are mistaken, but maybe the Internet. Sorry for the mistake.
      2. SOF
        SOF 15 January 2016 13: 19 New
        +4
        I didn’t understand anything. Are you talking about this photo?
        Well modelka, well, so-so.
        But where did you see the catapult in the photo? And where is the Yak44 ???
        1. lelikas
          lelikas 15 January 2016 14: 03 New
          +1
          Quote: SOF
          I didn’t understand anything. Are you talking about this photo?
          Well modelka, well, so-so.
          But where did you see the catapult in the photo? And where is the Yak44 ???

          YAKs are large and gray, and there are even two of them, with front struts, they are standing on catapults.
          1. SOF
            SOF 15 January 2016 14: 56 New
            +3
            sorry! I saw it!
            _________________
            1. BABA SHURA
              BABA SHURA 15 January 2016 18: 35 New
              +2
              To the level of 'trousers' like a hand to the stars!
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 15 January 2016 14: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: SOF
          But where did you see the catapult in the photo? And where is the Yak44 ???

          Yak-44 - a twin-engine propeller-driven AWACS aircraft.
          They are on the right on this model, one on the corner deck, the other in the parking area.
          And in front of them are gray stripes - these are catapult tracks. Because such a DRLO machine will not fly from a springboard.
  6. newcomer
    newcomer 15 January 2016 11: 39 New
    +4
    I agree with the gray angel. I think that for complete combat training in any Kuzya will go to Syria. uh, to see how our hosts host it for a moment.
  7. Ros 56
    Ros 56 15 January 2016 11: 54 New
    +2
    Here's another picture from a helicopter.
    1. Reducer
      Reducer 15 January 2016 15: 49 New
      +1
      We look carefully and are not surprised !!!
      1. Baikal
        Baikal 15 January 2016 17: 55 New
        0
        Quote: Reduktor
        We look carefully and are not surprised !!!

        Opachki, unexpected ... And what year is the picture, can you tell me? hi
      2. kolik2009
        kolik2009 16 January 2016 05: 17 New
        0
        Reserve)))
        it is not clear to me this purpose of one (one !!!) tire. And all the more so high (the aircraft carrier is a considerable ship). Is he really this place can rest somewhere ???
        1. Reducer
          Reducer 16 January 2016 10: 28 New
          +2
          What tire?
          Coat of arms of the Soviet Union painted over!
  8. newcomer
    newcomer 15 January 2016 12: 12 New
    +4
    he strained a bower when kuzya walked with a couple of three planes. they went around Kuzyu for the seventh mile. and you say.
  9. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 15 January 2016 12: 15 New
    +1
    The challenge is already this year to enter combat service on an aircraft-carrying cruiser

    In the spring-summer training, on the BS will probably go in the fall.
  10. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 15 January 2016 12: 26 New
    -2
    And he will go to Syria to acquaint the militants with his mother.
  11. viktor561
    viktor561 15 January 2016 12: 32 New
    -1
    Yes, the MiGs were buried - the priority of SU - lobbying for the drying and the MiGs were buried - this is a diversion
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 15 January 2016 12: 46 New
      +4
      Quote: viktor561
      Yes, the MiGs were buried - the priority of SU - lobbying for the drying and the MiGs were buried - this is a diversion

      You can’t bury MIGI, They have different tasks with Sushki. By bad, there will be a mixed air group, and so on by tasks. For Syria, for example, MIGs are more suitable, but they will not be in time there. request
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 15 January 2016 15: 03 New
        +2
        Quote: NIKNN
        You can’t bury MIGI, They have different tasks with Sushki.

        The problem is that the current MiGs, in the course of continuous upgrades and modifications, approached the Su-27 in mass and lost most of the advantages of light vehicles. And at the same time, they are still inferior in terms of performance characteristics to the Su family, primarily in range.

        The same MiG-29SMT is like the last modification of the German Pz.III: everything possible is squeezed out of the structure, but the “four” still surpasses it. smile
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 15 January 2016 17: 29 New
          +4
          The problem is that the current MiGs, in the course of continuous upgrades and modifications, approached the Su-27 in mass and lost most of the advantages of light vehicles. And at the same time, they are still inferior in terms of performance characteristics to the Su family, primarily in range.

          I won’t argue (about range), I wrote that depending on the tasks ...
          Su 33 is designed to gain superiority in the air and in the weapon kit (except for the Moskit anti-ship missiles it can only be armed with Moskit anti-ship missiles), the MiG 29k toggle has the entire weapon kit for working on the MC (anti-ship X-31A, anti-radar X-31P, missiles air-to-surface class X-25ML, X-29T, X-29L, NUR, KAB with laser and television guidance, free-falling bombs and aircraft mines.) THEREFORE, it was concluded from this that MIGA should not be buried. Well, I can add (only my own guesses, because I don’t know for sure) in terms of their dimensions, more can be based on the ship.
          Since then. request Wrong correct hi
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 18 January 2016 10: 47 New
            0
            Quote: NIKNN
            Su 33 is designed to gain superiority in the air and in a set of weapons (except for missiles BB can only be armed with anti-ship missiles "Mosquito") the toba as the MiG 29k does not have the entire set of weapons for work on the NC MC

            So ... the reason for this is simple and unpretentious - no one was engaged in the modernization of the Su-33.
            MiG-29KUB (R) - is a legacy of the Indian order, the machine of the early 2000s. And the Su-33 remained in the 80s. If it weren’t for the Indians, they would have gone Su-33 for modernization (or some Su-35K would have appeared).
    2. Scraptor
      Scraptor 16 January 2016 20: 51 New
      +1
      The diversion on the ship now - the Su-33 is superior in everything, the fact that he can’t work on the ground ... laughing Well, put him the necessary avionics blocks like the MiG-29
  12. Idiot
    Idiot 15 January 2016 12: 38 New
    +1
    The presence of an aircraft carrier cruiser as part of the Russian Navy is necessary primarily for reasons of prestige. A great power cannot afford not to have carrier-based aviation. Deck pilots in all countries are considered the elite of the Air Force, as far as I know, in the United States - a pilot who has made 100 landings on deck has the right to an audience with the president. First of all, in this way professionals of the highest level are trained, surpassing the enemy by head, even if they will not be further used in naval aviation.
    1. looker-on
      looker-on 15 January 2016 23: 36 New
      +1
      Hmm ... why can't a great power afford such a thing? It seems to me that a great power can afford anything. Germany, for example ... or Japan = leading economies, but they have no real aircraft carriers. No one has died.

      The presence or absence of a particular combat unit is not determined by a great power or not.
  13. mitrich
    mitrich 15 January 2016 14: 02 New
    +1
    This regiment, how many birds are there in real life? Will they all go to Kuzyu? How many dryers are left on Kuz? And what will the air wing really be? I would like to the maximum ....
    1. looker-on
      looker-on 16 January 2016 02: 46 New
      +1
      Very good questions! And then, on some posts, we are already making a landing on a California beach
  14. podgornovea
    podgornovea 15 January 2016 14: 02 New
    +2
    Finally, have long been waiting!
    Strange nowhere did you come across information about the new MiG-29K / KUB transferred to the Navy.
    About Su-34, Su-30СМ is regularly informed.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 15 January 2016 15: 06 New
      0
      Quote: podgornovea
      Strange nowhere did you come across information about the new MiG-29K / KUB transferred to the Navy.

      It was - and here too.
      The first four serial ship fighters MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB were delivered to the Russian Navy, the press service of the Ministry of Defense reported.
      "Corporation" MiG "transferred to the Navy two single MiG-29K and two double MiG-XNUMHKUB", - clarified the military department, ITAR-TASS.
      During 2014 and 2015, we expect to receive another 20 MiG-29K / KUB to replenish the fleet of the ship's regiment.

      http://topwar.ru/36469-vmf-rossii-poluchil-pervye-istrebiteli-mig-29k-i-mig-29ku
      b.html
  15. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 15 January 2016 14: 41 New
    +1
    A regiment of MiG-29 pilots has been formed to serve on the Admiral Kuznetsov, and this year will begin to fly, RIA Novosti reports a message from the chief of naval aviation of the Russian fleet Igor Kozhin.

    Who is it (the generals) that pulls the language? And so everyone blurs and blurs. And does the general - the Head of the naval aviation of the fleet - do not know that there are no pilots in military aviation, including naval aviation.
    There are PILOTS.
    1. VeteranVS
      VeteranVS 15 January 2016 15: 09 New
      0
      he then knows, RIA NEWS do not know. neither about the pilots, nor how his position is called, nor about the fact that he is a general. something like that.
      1. BABAY22
        BABAY22 15 January 2016 19: 37 New
        +3
        Let's dig even further. What means
        Pilot Regiment
        ?
        How many pilots are in this regiment? 50 man? What kind of regiment is this out of 50 people?
        To know in this regiment not only pilots serve. And if so, then this is not a regiment of pilots, and not even a regiment of navigators.
        And something like the Naval Fighter Aviation Regiment.
        1. excomandante
          excomandante 15 January 2016 22: 44 New
          0
          Indeed, the "regiment" is somehow petty, they would have called it immediately the air army)))
  16. VeteranVS
    VeteranVS 15 January 2016 14: 54 New
    0
    RIA NEWS disgraces in full: 1- “Mig-29 pilots”, 2 - “.. chief of naval aviation of the Russian fleet”. As I understand it, GVF pilots, military pilots. Navy chief of aviation, is he that civilian? frivolously somehow.
  17. newcomer
    newcomer 15 January 2016 16: 03 New
    +4
    serhj well, after a year’s lion, they will be replaced by another 29k moment, or maybe even more abruptly. in the meantime, they fly.
  18. Mityasha
    Mityasha 15 January 2016 21: 52 New
    0
    What kind of phrase, regiment of pilots ...? Complete illiterate crap. Maybe just a regiment is formed?
  19. DPN
    DPN 15 January 2016 22: 04 New
    -1
    The main MIG plane is universal, as in songs; there is only a MIG for it and hold on, and the pilots sort it out.
  20. kolik2009
    kolik2009 16 January 2016 05: 18 New
    -1
    Quote: Reduktor
    We look carefully and are not surprised !!!


    Reserve)))
    it is not clear to me this purpose of one (one !!!) tire. And all the more so high (the aircraft carrier is a considerable ship). Is he really this place can rest somewhere ???