Military Review

Media: Turkey sends refugees back to Syria, ignoring international law

83
Turkey systematically deport refugees to war-torn Syria, thereby violating international law, reports RIA News message channel ard.




Reporting this fact, the channel referred to “its own investigation and eyewitness accounts”. In addition, journalists have at their disposal video footage shot by human rights defenders Human Rights Watch, which captured the process of expelling more than a hundred refugees to the UAR.

“We have documented the facts of illegal detention of some of the most defenseless categories of citizens in Turkey,” said a representative of human rights activists.

According to the refugees themselves, they are “forced to sign documents in Turkish on consent to deportation” to the country from which they fled.

Earlier, the German government claimed that Ankara "is committed to its promise not to expel Syrian refugees to Syria," the channel recalled.

Since the beginning of the crisis, about 2 million migrants arrived in Turkey, thousands of 250 of whom live in special camps, and the rest, as they could, settled in border areas or left for major cities.

According to some data, Ankara spent on the maintenance of refugees about $ 8 billion. Brussels declared its readiness to provide assistance, and promised to transfer € 3 billion to migrants.

Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. RusGun4
    RusGun4 14 January 2016 19: 30 New
    12
    What sniffed gunpowder? How to shoot a pilot in the sky first, but how are all the attacks?
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 14 January 2016 19: 55 New
      11
      Turks have been and will be traders. That they are favorably received with a smile and a bow .. they can lick the boot. What is not profitable-just give a kick and all. No money - donations!
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 14 January 2016 20: 18 New
        35
        Ah Turks Turks, you’ve hit clearly! In vain you rush to Russia ... we all remember!
        1. Reserve officer
          Reserve officer 14 January 2016 21: 31 New
          +8
          International law and Turkey? These are certainly incompatible concepts.
          1. iouris
            iouris 15 January 2016 00: 46 New
            +2
            In general, one must understand that there is only the so-called "international law" applied to defeated wimps. Example: The Hague Tribunal.
        2. PaPapalpatine
          PaPapalpatine 14 January 2016 22: 15 New
          -31
          Naval and Navy Composition of the Turkish Navy and the Black Sea Fleet


          50 personnel
          Turkey
          14 submarines
          16 frigates
          8 corvettes
          19 mine sweepers
          29 DK
          60 battle boats
          other auxiliary vessels

          Black Sea Fleet
          25 thousand personnel
          1 RK
          1 BOD
          6 submarines
          3 patrol ship
          6 small missile ships
          11 minesweepers
          7 recreation centers
          5 battle boats
          other auxiliary vessels


          you still answer for Constantinople!


          They can. Reminding us and causing the Black Sea Fleet unacceptable damage.
          Patriotism should not turn into idiocy, Meehan
          1. iliitchitch
            iliitchitch 14 January 2016 22: 23 New
            21
            Quote: PaPapalpatine
            Naval and Navy Composition of the Turkish Navy and the Black Sea Fleet


            50 personnel 000 thousand personnel
            Turkey Black Sea Fleet
            14 submarines 6 submarines + 1 missile cruiser
            16 frigates 3 patrol ships 1 BOD
            8 corvettes 6 small missile ships
            19 minesweepers 11 minesweepers
            29 DK 7 DK
            60 combat boats 5 missile boats
            110 auxiliary vessels. other auxiliary vessels


            Two TU-95s are just not approaching (I’m not talking about “Caliber”), and where are those pelvis? And our straits, and the shield on the gates of Tsaregrad, business something. And America will get into a fight? My pliers are already laughing, obotsyutsya out of habit. In their eggs, calcium is not enough. This is not a throwing, this is a warning from a regional Power, but our region is a Planet.
            1. crazyrom
              crazyrom 14 January 2016 22: 49 New
              +6
              And what is the BSF is compared? It is necessary to compare at all. FF is so that it was, and if that, then Su and Tu will fly, and all kinds of bastions from the Crimea and not only, and other Topol. Yes, I almost forgot: we can shoot the whole Turkish armada in general with Caliber from the Caspian Sea, not to mention the same Black.
              1. PaPapalpatine
                PaPapalpatine 14 January 2016 23: 28 New
                -14
                On any warships there is an air defense system. Especially if these are ships of the Russian Federation and NATO. Or is this a discovery for you? Plus air cover. Plus air defense and pro on land. Well, by golly it’s kind of elementary.
                1. iliitchitch
                  iliitchitch 15 January 2016 02: 07 New
                  +4
                  Quote: PaPapalpatine
                  On any warships there is an air defense system. Especially if these are ships of the Russian Federation and NATO. Or is this a discovery for you? Plus air cover. Plus air defense and pro on land. Well, by golly it’s kind of elementary.


                  On Turkish pelvis, so be it, we will spend supersonic missiles, damn it, they fly fast, you won’t beat it. That’s straight from the coast of OUR, Crimean, fly. Submarines, you say? Are they counted individually? And the Black Sea Fleet for what, there is also the Black Sea Fleet aviation. Air cover, from where it will take off, well, let it fly, and how far will it fly if the entire coast of Crimea is pierced by air defense systems?
                  1. Mahmut
                    Mahmut 15 January 2016 06: 09 New
                    +2
                    They can. Reminding us and causing the Black Sea Fleet unacceptable damage.

                    The concept of unacceptable damage is purely American. And the balance of power between the Russian Federation and Turkey in all wars was on the side of Turkey. And nothing.
                  2. sa-ag
                    sa-ag 15 January 2016 08: 34 New
                    0
                    Quote: iliitch
                    if the entire coast of Crimea is poked with air defense systems?

                    as one military man told the media when the Americans started the Desert Storm or the second Iraqi company, the jamming was such that there was also light on the radar in the Russian Federation
            2. PaPapalpatine
              PaPapalpatine 14 January 2016 23: 01 New
              -28
              Two TU-95s are just not approaching (I’m not talking about “Caliber”), and where are those pelvis? And our straits, and the shield on the gates of Tsaregrad, business something. And America will get into a fight? My pliers are already laughing, obotsyutsya out of habit. In their eggs, calcium is not enough. This is not a throwing, this is a warning from a regional Power, but our region is a Planet.


              The pelvis, only flying, is that 95, which is already 50-60 years old. When did they start releasing them? Yes, you yourself know.
              For such plywood there is fighter aircraft, which will be raised by the Turks as soon as their companions fix our carcasses. Yes, they won’t destroy the bombers, but they’ll destroy the missiles (air-to-air missiles, including those used against cruise missiles, haven’t they heard?). And since everyone knows that carcasses are deployed at bases in Mozdok and Engels, it is naive to believe that the Turks do not watch them every minute.

              > I’m not talking about Caliber

              Oh yes, they have no analogues. Not even funny. But the Turks have Aegis, from which Medvedev had such a bherkhert in 2011. Buthertilo so that I had to frighten Europe with Iskander.

              > our region is a planet

              The Accounts Chamber determined the budget deficit of Russia at 2 trillion rubles. http://ria.ru/economy/20160114/1359533249.html
              In the light of 20 million poor and poor. http://topwar.ru/print:page,1,89069-gryadet-realnyy-bunt-srednego-klassa-kotoryy
              -pustili-pod-nozh.html

              Roll your lips and calm your pliers.
              1. Dart2027
                Dart2027 14 January 2016 23: 19 New
                14
                Quote: PaPapalpatine
                The pelvis, only flying, is that 95, which is already 50-60 years old. When did they start releasing them?

                Strategic bombers last a long time and this is common practice.
                Quote: PaPapalpatine
                For such plywood there is fighter aircraft

                Which we have, and not 50 years ago, like air defense systems.
                Quote: PaPapalpatine
                And the Aegis Turks have

                Which so far has not become famous for anything special, except for PR.
                Quote: PaPapalpatine
                The Accounts Chamber has determined the budget deficit of Russia at 2 trillion rubles

                US national debt 17 or already 18 trillion dollars. Roll your lips and calm your pliers.
                1. PaPapalpatine
                  PaPapalpatine 14 January 2016 23: 46 New
                  -19
                  Strategic bombers last a long time and this is common practice.


                  You do not catch the essence. Will explain. The characteristics of the carcass as they were 50 years ago, so they practically remained so. But air defense and missile defense systems for half a century have evolved like a slingshot into an automatic machine.


                  Which so far has not become famous for anything special, except for PR


                  Well, if you do not read anything except the topwar, then maybe it is.

                  The Aegis system has passed all the tests, has been adopted and has been successfully operated. And you continue to console yourself, they say, "PR", "did not show anything," and all things. If suddenly war - then we'll see how it manifests.

                  US national debt 17 or already 18 trillion dollars. Roll your lips and calm your pliers.


                  teapots do not understand that whatever one may say, the dollar is the most popular currency in the world. FACT. Therefore, if the United States is needed, they will print even a few hundred quadrillion and take it on their own for the dollar is printed by the US Federal Reserve themselves.
                  Bingo.

                  But Russia keeps its gold and foreign exchange reserves in dollars. Despite the fact that the "obamkaobizyanka" imposed sanctions against us. How do you like that, boots?
                  Is it a tricky planputin or is it a multi-pathway? laughing
                  1. Dart2027
                    Dart2027 15 January 2016 06: 12 New
                    +3
                    Quote: PaPapalpatine
                    You do not catch the essence. Will explain.

                    The wonders of aerobatics are not required from strategic bombers, and fighter aviation and air defense systems exist for their cover
                    Quote: Dart2027
                    Which we have, and not 50 years ago

                    Quote: PaPapalpatine
                    Aegis system has passed all tests, adopted and successfully operated

                    It’s just happened to read that in fact she’s not really catching like old rockets half a century ago.
                    Quote: PaPapalpatine
                    teapots do not understand, whatever one may say the dollar

                    The most bloated currency that is not backed up by anything and that there is no economy in the US.
                    Quote: PaPapalpatine
                    How do you like that, boots

                    Moreover, Putin calmly and consistently creates an alternative system.
                2. cheap trick
                  cheap trick 15 January 2016 00: 51 New
                  -17
                  listen dear! about the national debt of the United States, this bike was launched Zhirik 5 years ago! Of course, the United States has a debt like all countries, only income covers interest payments, and another carriage with a trolley remains! well this one! secondly, the states, if they should, are not going to give anyone away, and everyone knows this and is silent! But can Russia do that? no! he can’t take out debt from Ukraine, he would have brought gunpowder to his elbows to amers! finally feel the difference!
                  1. Dart2027
                    Dart2027 15 January 2016 06: 19 New
                    +4
                    Quote: cheap trick
                    about the state debt of the usa, this bike was launched by a little fat about 5 years ago

                    That is, it is not there and their whole economy is not one soap bubble?
                    Quote: cheap trick
                    second. the states, if they should, are not going to give anyone

                    That is, everyone knows that they are just counterfeiters?
                    Quote: cheap trick
                    cannot take out debt from Ukraine

                    Does she have something to give? Independence slowly and consistently creeps into the loop with minimal participation of Russia, and the United States can only rage with anger
            3. Antanas
              Antanas 15 January 2016 01: 41 New
              -10
              What is the planet there - the Universe :))) And Putin is its president. Actually, Turkey and many others have analogues of “Caliber” and other wunderwafes. Israel, for example, also. Although, of course, he doesn’t fight with Russia he’s going to, and we don’t even feel sorry for Turkey. The previous speaker correctly noted that patriotism was good until he turned into idiocy.
              1. alexander1
                alexander1 15 January 2016 02: 49 New
                13
                And it’s possible about the analogs of the caliber of Turkey, not just unfounded, but with specific designations and confirmed technical characteristics!
                1. iliitchitch
                  iliitchitch 15 January 2016 05: 52 New
                  +4
                  Quote: alexander1
                  And it’s possible about the analogs of the caliber of Turkey, not just unfounded, but with specific designations and confirmed technical characteristics!


                  Well, we understand, of course, that it’s not for printing, well, at least a little, gulchat, a little face ... Chew, why is there a trolley?
              2. Zoldat_A
                Zoldat_A 15 January 2016 04: 07 New
                +7
                Quote: Antanas
                What is the planet there - the Universe :))) And Putin is its president. In fact, Turkey and many others have analogues of “Caliber” and other wunderwafes.Israel, for example, also.

                Clear stump available. From the experience of communicating with people under the flag of Israel at VO, I know that Israel has everything. Like in Greece. And even that which is not in Greece. And a little more. laughing And in general, Israel is always and everywhere first and foremost in all. The second generation of “migratory birds”, ideologically incompatible with Russia, who know Russia from the stories of aunt from Haifa, has already told us about that ...

                Just not dumb - with such and such happiness - to live on the annual material assistance from the USA?
                1. Antanas
                  Antanas 15 January 2016 05: 30 New
                  -2
                  Where exactly did I write about "first of all" and "first of all"? Quote, plz. It's just that you should not look like an idiot, doing ridiculous hat-making. As for the "second generation" and "aunt from Haifa" - I was mistaken, boy, I have lived half a lifetime in the great and mighty .Let not in the RSFSR, but in Lithuania - it was one country. Well, about help - no, not dumb. The USA is our strategic ally. The help they provide goes mainly to defense and it is mutually beneficial - the USA uses most of the advanced Israeli developments funded by them.
                  1. Zoldat_A
                    Zoldat_A 15 January 2016 09: 44 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Antanas
                    As for the "second generation" and "aunt from Haifa" - wrong boy

                    “Boy” was very wrong once in a lifetime - when in 1972, he didn’t get where he needed from the SVD from 400. And the rest - I do not regret anything in my life. Including the fact that in the 80's he fought for this country, and did not run around the world like a rat in search of a sweet cookie.

                    The United States is our strategic ally. The assistance they provide goes mainly to defense and it is mutually beneficial - The United States takes advantage of most of the advanced Israeli developments they sponsor.
                    I would tell about Israeli developments, which the US is using with might and main, but I'm afraid moderators will suspect anti-Semitism ...
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. Antanas
                        Antanas 15 January 2016 11: 41 New
                        0
                        But you don’t judge by yourself. You didn’t even notice that you were the first to start talking about “aunt from Haifa?” But the govnosrach is bred just like you and they behave like the same traders trying to provoke an opponent. But your award sheets to me deeply-deeply. I gave my “prehistoric” everything that she demanded, so I won’t tell you anything about “emigrant hands”. Well, and especially not for you to give me instructions on which forum to enjoy.
              3. The comment was deleted.
            4. Antanas
              Antanas 15 January 2016 15: 14 New
              0
              Oh, how the guys got hurt that “flaccidity” hurt - how many sleepers were thrown
            5. Antanas
              Antanas 15 January 2016 15: 15 New
              +1
              Prasome vaikinai
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. sa-ag
            sa-ag 15 January 2016 08: 29 New
            -2
            Quote: iliitch
            And our straits, and the shield on the gates of Tsaregrad, business something.

            and the emperor of the new Byzantium ... the first, and the beards of the new boyars, the caps of a throat ... three
        3. Alexei
          Alexei 14 January 2016 22: 33 New
          15
          Quote: PaPapalpatine
          They can. Reminding us and causing the Black Sea Fleet unacceptable damage.

          You are some kind of naive trollish. These trolls are now putting pressure on the corn of reduced opportunities for consumption, thieves in power, the rotten elite, about the robbed people ... It works, and nonsense like yours has not rolled for a long time.
          1. PaPapalpatine
            PaPapalpatine 14 January 2016 23: 09 New
            -20
            You are some kind of naive trollish. These trolls are now putting pressure on the corn of reduced opportunities for consumption, thieves in power, the rotten elite, about the robbed people ... It works, and nonsense like yours has not rolled for a long time.


            You are a schizophrenic, if you do not know how to perceive reality as it is. The numbers on the fleet I brought. You have nothing to object to. In addition to po-reotic schizophasia, I haven’t read anything yet here, excuse me.
            1. Alexei
              Alexei 15 January 2016 00: 11 New
              17
              Quote: PaPapalpatine
              The numbers on the fleet I brought.

              Have you seriously decided that some kind of resort country, which claims to be (unsuccessfully) once in 200 years, can compete with Russia, which in turn is ahead of the rest in rocket science? belay Yes, you have to be a complete scumbag in order to rely on some kind of pro. Well, or a short-sighted strategist who counted the numbers in open sources and concluded. What can I say to you? Yes, if that begins, then the Armenians will immediately subscribe, not to mention the Kurds and Syrians. This Turkey can be so squeezed and strangled that rockets are not needed.
              1. PaPapalpatine
                PaPapalpatine 15 January 2016 00: 48 New
                -13
                Have you seriously decided that some kind of resort country, which claims to be (unsuccessfully) once in 200 years, can compete with Russia, which in turn is ahead of the rest in rocket science?


                With a patriotic epos in Russia, there was always an ZBS, only once, then, some
                the sushi empire managed to sink the mighty imperial fleet along with all its great-power pathos.

                > on rocket science ahead of the rest

                Who told you this? Rogozin? In the United States experienced a rocket with a vertical landing. Wow, it has no analogues. Delivered to Mars rover. While the Yankees are in full swing mastering civilian rocket science, the Russian woman boasts of Satan and poplars created in the USSR. Well, yes, there is still poplar M and yars, created on the basis of ordinary poplar. Well, some kind of experimental rocket was lit up.
                From civil ... Well, the hangar. And what is outstanding in it? Here salute and progress at one time were a technological breakthrough. Well, the hangar is like a hangar. No better and no worse than other missiles. Nothing outstanding.
                1. alexander1
                  alexander1 15 January 2016 02: 40 New
                  +7
                  Maybe not better? But even though they don’t buy engines for anyone, they do it themselves and sell it to the most advanced economy in the world, which is "mastering civilian rocket science"! And let’s see what’s more with the cost and profitability of this miracle vertical landing project! And on whose rockets does the entire advanced world community fly to the ISS?
                  1. Antanas
                    Antanas 15 January 2016 18: 21 New
                    +2
                    Firstly, the United States uses far from only Russian rocket engines, and secondly, do you know which engines are on those Russian passenger aircraft that are still produced? Surprise, but these engines are exclusively imported, mainly Pratt-Wittney and Rolls-Royce .
              2. PaPapalpatine
                PaPapalpatine 15 January 2016 01: 35 New
                -12
                > resort country

                "Resort Country" is one of the leading manufacturers of clothing and textiles in general in Europe, and also produces almost the entire range of weapons at home.

                http://topwar.ru/80647-tureckaya-promyshlennost-boevyh-mashin.html
                1. 33 Watcher
                  33 Watcher 15 January 2016 05: 27 New
                  +1
                  What does it produce? With tank building, they didn’t work out, for example ... Well, this is so, by the way ...
              3. PaPapalpatine
                PaPapalpatine 15 January 2016 01: 55 New
                -6
                The resort country produces more tractors annually (~ 70000pcs) than Russia 8 thousand.

                1st place in Europe for the production of clothing and textiles, the extraction of spar and pumice, and the production of plastics. Also an independent electronic industry.

                It independently produces almost the entire range of military equipment, including tanks, armored personnel carriers, engines, and RZSO.
                The only exceptions are airplanes and some types of missiles.

                1. alexander1
                  alexander1 15 January 2016 02: 46 New
                  +5
                  Ukraine also theoretically produces all types of weapons! Just a question, what ?!
                  And by the way, and tanks and planes and missiles, and even intercontinental! Only everyone can fight this only with their own, unarmed people in the Donbass! And stumble upon a less prepared enemy, and immediately "Debaltsev Stalingrad"!
                2. iliitchitch
                  iliitchitch 15 January 2016 03: 28 New
                  0
                  Quote: PaPapalpatine
                  The only exceptions are airplanes and some types of missiles.


                  Well, why so, huh? With pumice and plastics, everything is in order, but Europe did it for you fagot! Therefore, they do not accept in the EU. When will you catch up and overtake? And I advise you to forget about planes and rockets, was he born at all, the future first Turkish cosmonaut (not a tourist)? We also take your landlords, the first to walk on Mars. It seems to me that he was already born somewhere in us, the First on Mars, only as yet he does not know about it, he is still small.
                  1. Antanas
                    Antanas 15 January 2016 18: 25 New
                    0
                    And didn’t think (if at all in the know) - why are ALL imported Russian airplanes exclusively imported engines?
            2. iliitchitch
              iliitchitch 15 January 2016 02: 54 New
              +2
              Quote: PaPapalpatine
              You are a schizophrenic, if you do not know how to perceive reality as it is. The numbers on the fleet I brought. You have nothing to object to. In addition to po-reotic schizophasia, I haven’t read anything yet here, excuse me.


              Well, then what are YOU doing here then, they don’t understand mine. After the numbers in the fleet and the pearl about TU-95, I fell off the chair, why didn’t I live, where is my heart attack from rzhach? Why is there still no NATO in my garden?
            3. 33 Watcher
              33 Watcher 15 January 2016 05: 23 New
              0
              Russia, this is not only the Black Sea Fleet. Just open the map, take a ruler, put marks in the places of deployment of the fleet and the Turkish air force. Enough for the initial analysis. Size (distance) still matters. This is precisely the reason why the Americans so far have not gone to war with us, and they are far away, not Turkey. But they opened the cards and took the rulers ...
            4. Chiropractor
              Chiropractor 15 January 2016 09: 34 New
              0
              Quote: PaPapalpatine
              The numbers on the fleet I brought


              But doesn’t it bother you that if something happens, not only the fleet alone will be at war? As the old fighters tied one hand when they fought with a weak enemy, so the Russian Federation will not connect anything else ???

              Aegis efficiency - 80%. Those. of 5 missiles with YAZ one is guaranteed to break through. 550 km from Sevastopol to Ankara in a straight line, and if from our coast - then 500, Iskander will be enough to the limit. 24 minutes - and P500 at Erdogan in the garden ...

              Therefore, the Russian Federation can afford an advantage in the number of NATO troops and armored forces in Europe, which has a guaranteed opportunity to make the planet or its piece in the form of Europe ... or a part of Asia uninhabited (albeit not at once).
        4. crazyrom
          crazyrom 14 January 2016 22: 47 New
          +4
          And what do you compare the BSF? It is necessary to compare at all. FF is so that it was, and if that, then Su and Tu will fly, and all kinds of bastions from the Crimea and not only, and other Topol.
          1. PaPapalpatine
            PaPapalpatine 14 January 2016 23: 54 New
            -7
            Dear, Turkey has the strongest army in the region after Russia. This is despite the fact that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are spread out across our vast country, and in Turkey due to geographical reasons they are located compactly. That is, in one direction the Turks have more troops than the Russian Federation.

            I do not claim that Turkey will win. I say that it can cause unacceptable damage to the Russian army. Therefore, to boast, they say, "it's time to Constantinople" is at least the shtetl cretinism in the forum, and at the very least - politically inconsiderably.
            1. TVM - 75
              TVM - 75 15 January 2016 05: 31 New
              +2
              That's wonderful, that is compact! They will not smear weakly the entire “great power” together with the mattress masters!
        5. Weyland
          Weyland 15 January 2016 00: 19 New
          +8
          Quote: PaPapalpatine
          composition of the Turkish Navy and the Black Sea Fleet


          Do you recall the appropriate balance of power under Chesme, Tendra, Kaliakria, Sinope - or google yourself? laughing soldier
          1. PaPapalpatine
            PaPapalpatine 15 January 2016 00: 57 New
            -6
            you still remember how the Russians defeated the Ottoman-Crimean Tatar troops with young people in 1572.
            Oh, No. Why trifle.
            Let’s unwind for another 600 years, and there is our kingdom.

            1. Weyland
              Weyland 15 January 2016 01: 15 New
              +1
              Quote: PaPapalpatine
              you still remember how the Russians defeated the Ottoman-Crimean Tatar troops with young people in 1572.


              Would purcua not be pa? And if you want a closer look, just 100 years ago - then a descendant Turkish generalcaptured even by Minich at Bendery, also fought well (if you don’t know, that general was called Kolchak-bash)
              1. PaPapalpatine
                PaPapalpatine 15 January 2016 01: 30 New
                -5
                > only 100 years ago

                Just 100 years ago, not every house had a radio.

                Would purcua not be pa? And if you want to take a closer look, just 100 years ago, then the descendant of the Turkish general captured even by Minikh at Bendery also fought well (if you don’t know, that general was called Kolchak Bash)


                Here, as it were, a discussion of the 21st century Turkish fleet is going on ... but .... You and my own internal discussion are flaring up there. I will not disturb you.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 15 January 2016 04: 15 New
            +2
            Quote: Weyland
            Quote: PaPapalpatine
            composition of the Turkish Navy and the Black Sea Fleet


            Do you recall the appropriate balance of power under Chesme, Tendra, Kaliakria, Sinope - or google yourself? laughing soldier

            Hack and I want to advise PaPapalpatiney - love Wikipedia, the source of knowledge ... laughing laughing
            1. TVM - 75
              TVM - 75 15 January 2016 05: 34 New
              +2
              And what knowledge is to him! He corrupts his thirty coins. Banal stupid troll!
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. digo
          digo 15 January 2016 01: 23 New
          +4
          And what ?!
          Quote: PaPapalpatine

          They can. Reminding us and causing the Black Sea Fleet unacceptable damage.
          Patriotism should not turn into idiocy, Meehan

          .
          “The battle at Cape Tendra (the battle at Hajibey) is a naval battle on the Black Sea during the Russian-Turkish war of 1787-1791 between the Russian squadron under the command of F.F. Ushakov and the Turkish under the command of Hasan Pasha. It took place on August 28-29 ( September 8-9), 1790 near the Tendra Spit. ...

          ... Strengths of the parties:
          Russian Empire - 10 battleships, 6 frigates, 1 bombing ship and 20 auxiliary vessels, 830 cannons
          Ottoman Empire - 14 battleships, 8 frigates and 23 auxiliary vessels, 1400 cannons

          Losses:
          Russian Empire - 21 dead, 25 wounded
          Ottoman Empire - 2 ships, more than 2 thousand killed "...

          Source: http://fishki.net/1330045-krupnejshie-morskie-srazhenija-v-istorii-rossii.html © Fishki.net
        8. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 15 January 2016 03: 58 New
          +4
          Quote: PaPapalpatine
          They can. Reminding us and causing the Black Sea Fleet unacceptable damage.
          Patriotism should not turn into idiocy, Meehan

          We can too. MIKHAN said everything correctly. And I would not consider minesweepers ...
        9. user1212
          user1212 15 January 2016 05: 13 New
          0
          Why are you comparing the fleet of Turkey and the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation? What is the meaning of such a comparison? What is the development of the situation when the Turkish fleet can confront the Black Sea Fleet without attracting other funds from both sides?
        10. shchukin
          shchukin 15 January 2016 07: 42 New
          0
          The ship and strength of the Turkish Navy and the Black Sea Fleet. The comparison is not correct. You compare the Turkish Armed Forces and the South-East of the Russian Federation.
    2. makst83
      makst83 14 January 2016 20: 27 New
      14
      Turkey in violation of international law deport refugees to Syria, reports German television channel ARD
      And in accordance with international law, she should send them further to Germany. laughing laughing laughing
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 14 January 2016 21: 05 New
        +1
        In a similar article on RIA Novosti () at the end the following is written:
        ... Brussels wants Ankara to carefully guard its borders and prevent illegal immigrants from entering Europe.

        More on TASS:
        http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/2585986
        Apparently this should be understood as follows - let Turkey itself sort the refugees from Syria into illegal immigrants and into "legal"? Well, with the "legal" everything is clear, they will not wait for a tolerant (yet!) Europe. And what should I do with illegal immigrants? These are living people. I think that the Turks, taking advantage of the lack of control from the EU, will send back to Syria those who are profitable to them, but not illegal at all.
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 14 January 2016 21: 38 New
        +1
        And she directs. Only not refugees, but bandits - the vast majority of young healthy men who came to Europe.
      3. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 14 January 2016 23: 02 New
        +2
        Quote: makst83
        And in accordance with international law, she should send them further to Germany.


        Angela has nowhere to go with the budget, where, where are the unhappy German suffering refugees? You just think - Merkelsha = Deutsche Gorbacheff, in the sense of killing your own country? What is in her balance of conscience that will outweigh the curses of her own people? The fact that she is SO stupid, I do not believe that she could make such a mistake called "refugees".
    3. Asadullah
      Asadullah 14 January 2016 20: 40 New
      +4
      Turks have been and will be traders.


      Turks were, are and will be Turks. That is, people far and alien to the Russian people. As for the merchants, I really want to have more of them in Russia, because trade is a quick way to wealth. From that, it is very necessary that the Russians have as many rich people as possible. Not a state piece, but his labor. That would be rich and appreciate what they have, what they have acquired.
      1. Old old
        Old old 14 January 2016 21: 49 New
        +3
        As for the merchants, I really want to have more of them in Russia, because trade is a quick way to wealth. From that, it is very necessary that the Russians have as many rich people as possible. Not a state piece, but his labor.

        A large number of foreign traders is not the way to Russia's wealth, but rather the opposite (remember the 90s). To grow rich in trade, you need to take it cheaply (“peel” the colonies) and sell it expensively (“push in”). It is necessary to produce your own in the author mode.
      2. Old old
        Old old 14 January 2016 21: 49 New
        +2
        As for the merchants, I really want to have more of them in Russia, because trade is a quick way to wealth. From that, it is very necessary that the Russians have as many rich people as possible. Not a state piece, but his labor.

        A large number of foreign traders is not the way to Russia's wealth, but rather the opposite (remember the 90s). To grow rich in trade, you need to take it cheaply (“peel” the colonies) and sell it expensively (“push in”). It is necessary to produce your own in the author mode.
      3. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 14 January 2016 23: 41 New
        +4
        Quote: Asadullah
        Turks have been and will be traders.


        Turks were, are and will be Turks. That is, people far and alien to the Russian people. As for the merchants, I really want to have more of them in Russia, because trade is a quick way to wealth. From that, it is very necessary that the Russians have as many rich people as possible. Not a state piece, but his labor. That would be rich and appreciate what they have, what they have acquired.


        But my colleague, I want people to PRODUCE goods in Russia: agricultural products, missiles, pencils, airplanes, newspapers, ships, material assets, in general. And another very good thing is that the traders and intermediaries should be as few as possible, already sick of the parasites, and that their margin should be as low as possible. Rich is the one who, from his own labor, has, and not from someone else's, is the ideal of a crisis-free economy. If in the world no one took loans and did not try to cash in for free on the stock exchange or on the collective farm market (buying ruble parsley on the way from grandmothers, for example, intimidating their mujahideen mug and not letting them sell cops with connivance, and after 300 meters vparivaya ten - 9 rubles from the air, a blow to the economy of the state, by the way!) - there would be no crises. There is a colleague, the contradiction between us, and this is noticeable in the flags.
      4. sergey.
        sergey. 1967s 15 January 2016 01: 01 New
        +1
        And the Russians were and will be YOUR enemies! You’ve always been beaten by history! And more than once they will beat you CHUROK!
        1. iliitchitch
          iliitchitch 15 January 2016 04: 42 New
          0
          Well, why so extreme. Victory comes to a calm and sane, mentally prepared, to Alexander Vasilievich Suvorov, for example. As far as I remember, the only commander in history who did not lose a single battle and died not on the battlefield, but by his death. Kutuzov's teacher. Napoleon pissed off with Suvorov, he sent his generals-shopkeepers, because he was afraid to shit. Well, Kutuzov also jerked him, fate ...
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Uran
    Uran 14 January 2016 20: 48 New
    +8
    the Turks are very rotten people, they still consider our country as the main threat than the igil.
  • kil 31
    kil 31 14 January 2016 19: 31 New
    +6
    They have recently been given 3 yards. Nefigase speed from Turkish theft officials.
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 14 January 2016 19: 59 New
      +1
      Yes, hurry in front of the kirdyk. I remember that in 98, we lost money even faster. And one of the iPhones again remembered that damn year by night ... Something is not good for it, although it's not August in the yard.
    2. Extraneous
      Extraneous 14 January 2016 22: 14 New
      +2
      Three billion just promised them. So far they have given five million, in my opinion.
      In general, as soon as Merkel had the idea to pay Erdogan so that he would take back part of the refugees, it was absolutely clear that he would send them to Syria. He does not intend to keep more refugees in his camps. And so he creates conditions that could complicate the military operations of the Syrian army near the borders in connection with the presence of many civilians. Plus, there is a chance that refugees will fall under the bombing of the aerospace forces, which is what the calculation is for. Then, under the pretext of protecting refugees from Russian bombing, he will send troops to Syria "legally" to protect the supply corridor.
      The strategy is elementary.
  • Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 14 January 2016 19: 32 New
    +3
    Merkel come on money.
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 14 January 2016 19: 40 New
      +3
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      Merkel come on money.

      They already unfastened the EU’s 3 lard, but it’s clear that it’s not enough ...
      1. Primus pilus
        Primus pilus 14 January 2016 19: 44 New
        0
        For 3 lard, the EU does not pay off. Erdogan will say that he has pretty much restrained.
      2. -Traveller-
        -Traveller- 14 January 2016 19: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Tersky
        They already unfastened 3 lard EU

        so far the payment has not passed, but "when there is no money, there is no love"
  • -Traveller-
    -Traveller- 14 January 2016 19: 32 New
    +2
    the logic, apparently, is this - either to Europe or back to Syria. The EU proposed 3 yards so that they would not be sent to them, but Syria would not.
  • MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 14 January 2016 19: 32 New
    +6
    The EU paid them 3 billion, and the devils work it out! (I won’t be surprised if they start to wet them with scimitars)
  • Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 14 January 2016 19: 34 New
    +3
    Poor people ... I'm talking about refugees, not about Turks.
    1. -Traveller-
      -Traveller- 14 January 2016 19: 37 New
      +1
      want to shelter?
      I'm talking about refugees, not about Turks.
      1. Nick
        Nick 14 January 2016 19: 44 New
        +7
        Quote: -Traveller-
        want to shelter?
        I'm talking about refugees, not about Turks.

        Are you ready to give 3 lard for content?
        1. -Traveller-
          -Traveller- 14 January 2016 19: 48 New
          +6
          ready to promise laughing
          1. The black
            The black 14 January 2016 19: 54 New
            +7
            I won’t tell you, but those who have the same flag and can only promise in your profile and know how to .. wink ... especially prosperity and democratic values ​​... do not believe it - ask the Syrians, Iraqis, Libyans ...
            1. -Traveller-
              -Traveller- 14 January 2016 20: 03 New
              +2
              I don’t speak Arabic, and where can I meet them?
              although ... some Arabs sat at the border crossing in Finnish in December, I didn’t ask where they were from.
      2. Tersky
        Tersky 14 January 2016 19: 49 New
        10
        Quote: -Traveller-
        want to shelter?

        We have already sheltered
        In September 2015, the Federal Migration Service of Russia (FMS) reported that there are 2,6 million Ukrainian citizens in the Russian Federation. Of these, only 1,1 million are residents of Donbass. ..... According to data for January 2016, in the 61 constituent entity of the Russian Federation, 252 temporary accommodation points for Ukrainian citizens have been deployed. Out of the total number of Ukrainian refugees, 500 thousand people decided to stay in Russia forever (acquired citizenship) or for a long time (received a residence permit or temporary asylum).
        read fully here Well, now name how many the country has sheltered a flag which "proudly" flies over your nickname, for the period from 2013 to 2016.
        1. -Traveller-
          -Traveller- 14 January 2016 19: 53 New
          +2
          the website gave me the flag, I myself am in Murmansk. I have a refugee sister from Gorlovka, though not to Russia, but to central Ukraine I moved with my husband, there was work. periodically help as much as possible - western union works there
          1. Tersky
            Tersky 14 January 2016 20: 04 New
            +7
            Quote: -Traveller-
            the website gave me a flag,

            You are mistaken, the site of flags does not give out, your provider gives out them.
            Quote: -Traveller-
            I have a refugee sister from Gorlovka, though not to Russia, but to central Ukraine

            And in Russia there were no options? They didn’t run away, but added problems to themselves .. At one time (1993) I experienced the "charms" of refugee life ... Sincerely, hi !
            1. -Traveller-
              -Traveller- 14 January 2016 20: 13 New
              +1
              called to Russia, there is where to settle, did not go.
              I don’t know about problems, they live somehow, the state pays them 800 hryvnias or something like that for renting housing as internally displaced persons, there is some work at the flour mill, of course, it’s not a profession. at least alive and well. and in the throat full of a madhouse, the city was not in the best condition even before the war, but now it’s finally - neither the authorities, nor the work, but also shoot.
            2. nazar_0753
              nazar_0753 14 January 2016 20: 25 New
              +1
              Quote: Tersky
              Quote: -Traveller-
              the website gave me a flag,

              You are mistaken, the site of flags does not give out, your provider gives out them.

              Well, I don’t know, for example, the Moldavian flag sometimes gives me, although I live in Moscow)
      3. GRAY
        GRAY 14 January 2016 22: 29 New
        +3
        Quote: -Traveller-
        want to shelter?

        The sensible ones themselves get over, and the stupid ones are not for nothing to us.
        In our clinic, a Syrian doctor works and feels normal, he does not ask for a shelter.
  • The black
    The black 14 January 2016 19: 35 New
    +2
    Apparently the inadequate behavior of relatives from the east who came to their European grandmothers made some Western media take the blinders off their eyes ...
  • Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 14 January 2016 19: 37 New
    +6
    Oh, how ... The Turkobesy are sending Igilovites to the geyropa, and they are turning real refugees back to Syria. It is necessary to have a profit from all sides. "Here ..." (film "Brother")
    1. Pirogov
      Pirogov 14 January 2016 20: 15 New
      0
      This is the scenario, everything is thought out in the USA, the Turks perform! These refugees will still show themselves!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 14 January 2016 20: 15 New
    0
    It’s interesting when the Turks become refugees in their country (God forbid) the EU will send them back, and to whom they will pay billions so that the EU refugees do not completely colonize them.
  • -СтрР° РЅРЅРёРє-
    -СтрР° РЅРЅРёРє- 14 January 2016 20: 20 New
    0
    Turkey sends refugees back

    Has anyone been surprised? wink hi
  • Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 14 January 2016 20: 30 New
    +2
    International law for Turkey exists only when it is beneficial to them.
  • Evgesh91
    Evgesh91 14 January 2016 20: 39 New
    +1
    that’s why I respect the Turks, because they wanted to spit on everyone.
    Threat, from this I did not winked
  • Good_Mih
    Good_Mih 14 January 2016 20: 41 New
    0
    Yes, well done, that they expel. Syrians must live in Syria ...
  • jovanni
    jovanni 14 January 2016 20: 50 New
    0
    It was they who decided to work out three lard ...
  • avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 14 January 2016 21: 00 New
    0
    The European Union, as always, declaring rights, forgot (read - scored) on its obligations or took a wait and see attitude. They promised money to the Turks, they did not wait and decided to put pressure on such a macar. Tomorrow Europe may throw money, and the flywheel is already untwisted, so go home, go home ....
  • Son of the ural
    Son of the ural 14 January 2016 21: 57 New
    +1
    You can consider me a sadist, but refugees need it ... Especially healthy peasants who can only rape harmless women in quiet Germany in a group at night. I can’t even imagine that so many people fled from the USSR during the Second World War.
  • soroKING
    soroKING 14 January 2016 22: 27 New
    +2
    Quote: Dr. Bormental
    Turks have been and will be traders. That they are favorably received with a smile and a bow .. they can lick the boot. What is not profitable-just give a kick and all. No money - donations!

    doctor, they became merchants recently, before that they were gangsters (Tatar-Mongols are just gentle people) read the literature of Romanians, Bulgarians, Hungarians, etc. and here proverbs were laid out about them google hi
  • kapitan92
    kapitan92 14 January 2016 22: 41 New
    10
    Quote: PaPapalpatine
    Naval and Navy Composition of the Turkish Navy and the Black Sea Fleet


    50 personnel
    Turkey
    14 submarines
    16 frigates
    8 corvettes
    19 mine sweepers
    29 DK
    60 battle boats
    other auxiliary vessels

    Black Sea Fleet
    25 thousand personnel
    1 RK
    1 BOD
    6 submarines
    3 patrol ship
    6 small missile ships
    11 minesweepers
    7 recreation centers
    5 battle boats
    other auxiliary vessels


    you still answer for Constantinople!


    They can. Reminding us and causing the Black Sea Fleet unacceptable damage.
    Patriotism should not turn into idiocy, Meehan

    ........ The capture of Ishmael was considered impossible. Before the war itself, the fortress was thoroughly rebuilt and strengthened. It was surrounded by a high rampart and a fairly wide moat filled with water. The fortress had 11 bastions, where 260 guns were placed. The work was led by German and French engineers ....... On the day of the capture of the Turkish fortress Izmail, the Russian side lost 2136 people killed. These included: soldiers - 1816, Cossacks - 158, officers - 66 and 1 brigade leader. There were several more wounded - 3214 people, including 3 generals and 253 officers. The losses from the Turks seemed simply huge. Only the dead were more than 26 thousand people. About 9 thousand were captured, but the next day 2 thousand died from the wounds received. - Read more at SYL.ru: http://www.syl.ru/article/166436/new_vzyatie-izmaila-suvorovyim-vzyatie-kreposti
    -izmail
    You can’t underestimate the enemy, that’s right !!! But there’s also a “Russian spirit”, and let them take into account !!!!
  • atamankko
    atamankko 14 January 2016 22: 59 New
    0
    For the sake of profit, the Turks are capable of anything, they forget about conscience when they see a profit.
  • Nehist
    Nehist 15 January 2016 00: 20 New
    0
    And that they then hit the Turks? And they are right to do that international law doesn ... send. Russia would also have to learn to send this right, otherwise it’s forever looking with everyone in the world as they look.
  • certero
    certero 15 January 2016 01: 58 New
    0
    Quote: Antanas
    In fact, analogues of “Caliber” and other child prodigies are available in Turkey and many more.

    Share intelligence on the presence in the arms of Turkey cruise missiles with a range of thousands of kilometers.
  • Antanas
    Antanas 15 January 2016 05: 46 New
    -3
    Quote: alexander1
    And it’s possible about the analogs of the caliber of Turkey, not just unfounded, but with specific designations and confirmed technical characteristics!

    There are American airborne-based KRs at American air force bases. But there are some of them, for example, with a radius of destruction of about 200 km. Work is now underway to bring to readiness the KR with a radius of up to 500 km. Carriers, and in the future.
    1. Antanas
      Antanas 15 January 2016 06: 37 New
      -2
      . F-16 carriers, and in the future - F-35.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Dart2027
      Dart2027 15 January 2016 17: 45 New
      0
      Quote: Antanas
      American airborne missiles

      A caliber aviation-based ?! Well, well, why not dream about it at night.
      1. Antanas
        Antanas 17 January 2016 16: 21 New
        0
        The Americans also have a sea base, of course - the same Tomahawks, for example with no less range.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 17 January 2016 18: 49 New
          0
          Quote: Antanas
          the same "Tomahawks"

          I’m aware of the Tomahawks, but it’s strange to compare naval and aviation missiles.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Antanas
    Antanas 15 January 2016 07: 46 New
    -1
    Quote: alexander1
    And it’s possible about the analogs of the caliber of Turkey, not just unfounded, but with specific designations and confirmed technical characteristics!

    For example - SOM.
  • gregor6549
    gregor6549 15 January 2016 08: 23 New
    0
    I wrote about a "hot friendship" between Russia and Turkey a couple of years ago. I was then bombarded with minuses, accusing me of political myopia. Now it seems that myopia in relation to Turkey among many Russians has been replaced by farsightedness. Those. in everything that is connected with Turkey they already see what actually is not. Those. normal vision, as it were, is absent. Such a distortion of vision also takes place in this case with refugees. Moreover, for some reason, many people forget that the issue of refugees is regulated by each country according to its own internal laws. And Turkey has the right to decide what to do with refugees from other countries and whom to consider as such. Otherwise, Turkey and all other countries will face an uncontrolled invasion of the wild, hordes that can very quickly turn any country into a desert. And already transform. What a lot of so-called business does on refugees “human rights defenders” should not mislead anyone, including human rights defenders themselves. because no money earned by the “overwork” of these defenders will save them in the end from these hordes. Amen!