RIA News cites a fragment of a statement by the head of the foreign ministry of the Netherlands:
The prosecution investigation is very intensive. On this basis, we will decide in the coming months with the countries involved on finding the best mechanism for prosecuting those responsible at the national level or through the creation of a joint court by the countries. Depending on the progress of the investigation, we will make a decision with other colleagues.
Recall that the Boeing-777, following the route Amsterdam - Kuala Lumpur was shot down near the village of Hrabovo 17 July 2014 of the year. As you can see, the investigation is going on so “intensively” that for more than a year and a half, the investigation team could not answer the question of who hit the Malaysian airliner, on board which were 298 passengers and crew members ...
Meanwhile, the Rosaviation discovered another unreliable facts in the “final” report of Dutch experts. In particular, reports that the Dutch side made the wrong conclusion about the nature of the munition, which was shot down the plane.
From the letter of the Deputy Head of the Federal Air Navigation Agency Oleg Storchhevoy to the head of the Security Council of the Netherlands, Tybbe Yustra:
New important facts pointing to the unreliability of the information given in the final report, assuming that the plane was shot down by a Buk-type air defense missile system, are: inconsistency of the reported fragment characteristics with the characteristics of the damaging elements of the 9H314М warhead; the discrepancy between the reported characteristics of the holes on the aircraft fragments and the characteristics of the holes that are formed during the explosion of the 9H314М warhead.
Oleg Storchevoy informs about the discrepancy of at least one detected destructive element to the rocket, which was recorded “in the culprit” of the tragedy by the Dutch investigators. In addition, the Dutch Commission, as reported in the Federal Air Navigation Agency, made the wrong conclusions about where the attack was carried out from the airliner.
One gets the impression that the Dutch investigation team did not use the year and a half to gather facts and investigate the causes of the tragedy, but to simply tailor the report to the conclusions needed by the West without providing objective evidence.