Military Review

White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense issues

62
Washington is ready for further discussion with Moscow of problems related to the expansion of missile defense, and intends to prove that the system is not directed against Russia, reports RIA News Statement by Advisor to American President Ben Rhodes.




“The key point here is that Russia believes that this (PRO) threatens it. We believe that we are ready to show, both technically and by other means, that we are seriously concerned about the threat that comes from countries such as Iran and North Korea, ”said the adviser.

“We are open to discussion,” Rhodes added.

“We are open to dialogue with Russia on this issue,” he said. - But the key stumbling block, in my opinion, lies in Russia's confidence that our intentions are directed against it. We believe that we are able to show, technically and by other means, that we are actually worried about the threats. ”

“It (the system) is directed against countries like North Korea and Iran. That is why in recent years we have deployed additional anti-missile resources in Northeast Asia. To protect himself, as well as the Republic of Korea, Japan and the entire region, ”Rhodes concluded.
Photos used:
http://russian.irib.ir/
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NIKNN
    NIKNN 14 January 2016 13: 25 New
    +4
    Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 14 January 2016 13: 31 New
      +9
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense.

      Not screwed up. Under such hesitation, a missile defense system will be fully deployed by the end of 2018.
      1. Pilot
        Pilot 14 January 2016 13: 47 New
        +3
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: NIKNN
        Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense.

        Not screwed up. Under such hesitation, a missile defense system will be fully deployed by the end of 2018.


        I think overexposed the idea of ​​missile defense, the Americans. Not for sale, horror story, more. The idea has fallen.
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 14 January 2016 13: 53 New
          +2
          White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense issues

          Do you have problems with missile defense? smile Well, no, your problems are your problems, there’s nothing to discuss!
          1. cap
            cap 14 January 2016 14: 41 New
            0
            Quote: SRC P-15
            White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense issues

            Do you have problems with missile defense? smile Well, no, your problems are your problems, there’s nothing to discuss!

            Well wait. Donkeys in a harness. hi
            1. krot
              krot 14 January 2016 16: 32 New
              +2
              Как они могут доказать!!? А при случае, как у них это водится, свои "доказательства" обратно возьмут! Мы тоже супер торпеду не против Америки строим)И можем это доказать!)
            2. red_october
              red_october 14 January 2016 23: 48 New
              +2
              I want to respond to every remark of the State Department with the words of a classic (and Sergey Lavrov) ....
      2. meriem1
        meriem1 14 January 2016 15: 06 New
        -1
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: NIKNN
        Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense.

        Not screwed up. Under such hesitation, a missile defense system will be fully deployed by the end of 2018.

        Let it unfold. She does not catch calibers. Therefore, conversations began! Although a little earlier no one wanted to listen to our arguments! Everything has changed. The pro system has turned into scrap metal.
      3. Observer2014
        Observer2014 14 January 2016 22: 49 New
        +1
        "Белый дом: Вашингтон готов продолжить обсуждение проблем ПРО"
        Вот что животворящий "Статус 6" делает!!!! И наша межконтинентальня стратегическая торпеда , c зарядом в 100 или 200 мегатонн в кобальтовой оболочке не в коем случая не будет направленна против США ,Англии,Японии,и тд.
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 14 January 2016 13: 33 New
      11
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?

      Unfortunately, they didn’t stain the pants, they simply added mattresses to the usual spells against Iran, added North Korea, and the missile defense was deployed somewhere in Poland or the Czech Republic. To believe in these exceptional ones is to not respect yourself.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 14 January 2016 13: 46 New
        +5
        But we do not want to agree yet ... We are building up power! And then, perhaps, on our terms ... Russia can’t go to different treaties now .. DECEPE, again!
      2. iConst
        iConst 14 January 2016 13: 48 New
        +3
        Quote: vlad66
        Unfortunately, they didn’t stain the pants, they simply added mattresses to the usual spells against Iran, added North Korea, and the missile defense was deployed somewhere in Poland or the Czech Republic. To believe in these exceptional ones is to not respect yourself.
        - To offer them to deploy a missile defense system in Russia is more effective. Against Korea ... laughing
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 14 January 2016 13: 46 New
      +2
      Один раз мы поверили в "искреннее заверение" запада и даже подписали пакт о ненападении в 1939 году. Последствия того, что случилось 22 июня 1941 года всем известны. Америкосы думают, что мы мазохисты и с радостью наступим на те грабли еще разок.
      1. Mikhail Krapivin
        Mikhail Krapivin 14 January 2016 14: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Один раз мы поверили в "искреннее заверение" запада и даже подписали пакт о ненападении в 1939 году.


        Why once? And the second time they believed when they promised NATO not to expand. What we have as a result, everyone knows. So it remains for the third time to believe, God, because he loves the Trinity ...
    4. Monos
      Monos 14 January 2016 13: 48 New
      +5
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?


      Mattresses drag on time and hope once again to make us talk. But it looks like this number is no longer passing.
    5. Sssrkz
      Sssrkz 14 January 2016 13: 54 New
      +1
      This is a fairy tale about a white bull, they will not refuse
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. Kent0001
      Kent0001 14 January 2016 13: 58 New
      +1
      Yes, in principle, there is nothing to discuss. Take all this away from our borders and the theme itself will disappear.
    8. APASUS
      APASUS 14 January 2016 20: 33 New
      0
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?

      Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.(I'm afraid of Danians and gifts that bring.)
      How predictable they are.
      All on one textbook!
      Today Poroshenko delivered a speech that Ukraine is ready for negotiations on debt, only now Russia is slow and delaying.
  2. HAM
    HAM 14 January 2016 13: 29 New
    +7
    Are they looking worse than themselves?
    1. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 14 January 2016 13: 34 New
      +5
      "намерен доказать, что система не направлена против России"

      Do we need it? A discussion like that?
      The location coordinates of these systems are known, but nothing else is needed.
      1. Al_oriso
        Al_oriso 14 January 2016 14: 43 New
        0
        So our missile defense also
        against countries like North Korea and Iran
        , there can be no doubt in the USA. Don't you really believe us?
  3. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 14 January 2016 13: 29 New
    +8
    Мы то-же можем написать на своих МБР что они направлены на сдерживание возможной Лунной интервенции. Можем даже люминесцентной написать "На Луну"
    1. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 14 January 2016 22: 09 New
      +1
      We are also very afraid of North Korea and Iran, so missiles must be delivered in Kaliningrad and ... in Cuba.
  4. Riv
    Riv 14 January 2016 13: 29 New
    0
    Probably the problem is that the American missile defense can only do that to neutralize the threat of North Korea (and most likely it cannot). Where was this system when two skyscrapers were demolished in Manhattan in half an hour?
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 14 January 2016 13: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Riv
      Where was this system when two skyscrapers were demolished in Manhattan in half an hour?


      At the design office))
      In general, there are already so many copies broken and articles written on this subject that not everything was as simple as they want to show us. And it’s very convenient and timely that these two Biongas demolished the towers, and the towers somehow strangely fell quickly, although they shouldn’t.
      MN-17 from the same opera, amers always did not give a damn about civilian casualties.
  5. Inok10
    Inok10 14 January 2016 13: 29 New
    +5
    “It (the system) is directed against countries like North Korea and Iran. That is why in recent years we have deployed additional anti-missile resources in Northeast Asia. To protect himself, as well as the Republic of Korea, Japan and the entire region, ”Rhodes concluded.
    .. especially the missile defense base located in Poland .. how is it with geography? ... apparently .. not like .. laughing
  6. V.ic
    V.ic 14 January 2016 13: 30 New
    +5
    Как сказал бы Станиславский: "Не верю!"
    Vadim Luchkin. 1990

    "Не верь единожды солгавшей,
    All excuses are just nonsense.
    In your eyes so low fallen
    There is no more faith in her.

    Why now the words are empty,
    Let it be a holy lie
    Just let it go
    And you will regret, you yourself will understand:

    How vile, low was deceived,
    How the fog covered his eyes.
    Years will pass, in the past they will sink
    Grievances are those, but not deception.

    He's like a scar on thin skin
    He's like a thorn in your eye.
    Believe people, but remember, nevertheless,
    And a lie is capable of a tear.

    And what is so sincere
    Sometimes a veil of false phrases
    And the gaze blazes with innocence
    Without shy eyes
    .

    To her, who had forgiven the hope,
    Manage worthy to give an answer.
    Believe me, - once lied
    Ни в чём уж больше веры нет."
  7. kebeskin
    kebeskin 14 January 2016 13: 31 New
    +1
    Я конечно извиняюсь за очередной оффтопчик про свой родной край: про наших "хероев" которых нужно знать в лицо. Руки так и чешутся к стенке поставить...

    Krasnoyarsk City Council deputy Konstantin Senchenko posted a post today, January 14, in connection with yesterday’s statement by the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, about Russia's enemies. Recall, as reported by Interfax, Kadyrov made a statement.

    “People whom no one had heard anything before, climb over their heads to become famous for opposing themselves to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Representatives of the so-called non-systemic opposition are trying to cash in on a difficult economic situation. Such people should be treated as enemies of the people, as traitors. They have nothing sacred, ”the Interfax politician quoted as saying at a meeting with journalists in Grozny on the eve of Russian Press Day.

    В своем посте Константин Сенченко пишет: «Рамзан, ты позор России. Ты дискредитировал все, что можно. Ты дискредитировал звание Академика, так как имея 3 класса образования, носишь звание, которое носили величайшие умы России. <…> Ты дискредитировал звания Героя России. Я помню те времена, когда мы здесь в Красноярске собирали помощь нашим парням, которые ехали воевать в Чечню. Ты тогда бегал по горам и убивал наших ребят. Они теперь лежат в земле, а ты герой России (орфография и пунктуация сохранены)».

    The full text of the deputy’s statement is shown in the photo. In 4 hours, he scored more than 100 “likes” and more than 150 reposts, including from oppositionist Alexei Navalny.
    1. gergi
      gergi 14 January 2016 13: 50 New
      +5
      I don’t know who Senchenko is, but if he has piled for him, then Kadyrov is right!
  8. mpzss
    mpzss 14 January 2016 13: 31 New
    +3
    but I’m wondering how the missile defense system installed in Europe will protect the southern brown and Japan ... or do I have gaps in geography?
    1. lysyj bob
      lysyj bob 14 January 2016 13: 34 New
      0
      And who was going to defend them?
    2. kostiknet
      kostiknet 14 January 2016 13: 56 New
      0
      Quote: mpzss
      . or do I have gaps in geography?

      Это вряд ли... Просто "исключительные" живут в альтернативной вселенной! И карты мира у них тоже ... альтернативные. repeat
    3. Nick888
      Nick888 14 January 2016 14: 38 New
      0
      Maybe they suggest that the Koreans have technologies for opening moleholes in order to bypass Russian territory and missile defense, respectively) ... hehe
    4. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 14 January 2016 22: 12 New
      +1
      Exceptional geography problems ... laughing
      John McCain: the capture of Mariupol will open the way for the militia to the Baltic fellow
  9. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 14 January 2016 13: 32 New
    +2
    Следующая часть марлезонского балета:" мы хотим контроллировать вашу территорию и ваши ядерные силы потому, что боимся тех у кого в ближайшее десятилетие не может появиться межконтинентальных средств доставки ЯО." Затянули старую песню , видимо, опять кому-то собрались элемент ПРО вставить.
  10. engineer74
    engineer74 14 January 2016 13: 32 New
    +1
    I wonder what they want for a missile defense? Syria? Ukraine? Or all together?
    ИМХО, надо ответить: Нам ваше ПРО не интересно - у нас "Статусы" с 1-го по 6-й есть! wink
  11. Lunaaron
    Lunaaron 14 January 2016 13: 34 New
    +2
    They did not run into missile defense in Europe, because this system was sharpened for delivering the first strike against ground targets in the European part of Russia. It seems to me that the point here is somewhat different. It’s just that suddenly the USA turned out to be unprotected from our strategic cruise missiles launched from the Tu-95, Tu-160 in the Arctic. Therefore, they are being traded.

    How the Russian Air Force merges the American missile defense.
    http://putin-slil.livejournal.com/185684.html
  12. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 14 January 2016 13: 37 New
    +2
    That is why in recent years we have deployed additional missile defense resources in Northeast Asia.


    Well, finally recognized that the Poles, Romanians and others like them are the real ASIAN !!! And then they all bore - we are Europe
  13. bronik
    bronik 14 January 2016 13: 38 New
    +2
    Maybe missile defense is aimed at protecting Russia? But we didn’t know ...
    Может для защиты "дружеских" ПРО поставить там и наши ракеты? На прямую наводку!
  14. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 14 January 2016 13: 40 New
    +1
    North Korea does not border France for an hour? It’s just about Europe, which means that those against whom it is directed should be close, so that missiles can fly close, otherwise the hour is uneven.
  15. Dam
    Dam 14 January 2016 13: 42 New
    0
    Not the first time I write, but I repeat: PRO is the same Mega fake as the SOI in front of it. There is nothing to discuss in principle. Another attempt to sell dead donkey ears at a reasonable price
  16. gergi
    gergi 14 January 2016 13: 45 New
    +1
    This is not a missile defense, these are short- and medium-range missiles. Bypassing the contract. Put a nuclear head and fuck. Nay balovoe next. They can’t believe in any way that a screw with a thread is already near their assholes. Yegor traded in the market, enchanted the people, but Yegor fell on a thief, and his ego was enchanted.
  17. jovanni
    jovanni 14 January 2016 13: 45 New
    0
    Are they taking us for the finished? Or for your population? Then - yes, then of course! For this contingent, the version is just right ...
  18. Woodman
    Woodman 14 January 2016 13: 46 New
    +1
    Mdaaa ... There is a missile defense - there is a problem, there is no missile defense - there is no problem.
  19. wasjasibirjac
    wasjasibirjac 14 January 2016 13: 47 New
    0
    “It (the system) is directed against countries like North Korea and Iran. That is why in recent years we have deployed additional anti-missile resources in Northeast Asia. To protect himself, as well as the Republic of Korea, Japan and the entire region, ”Rhodes concluded.
    prove ........ this is something like the Pythagorean theorem.
  20. Tektor
    Tektor 14 January 2016 13: 49 New
    +1
    Точка невозврата пройдена. Всё - лишь трёп и "дымовая завеса".
  21. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 14 January 2016 13: 51 New
    0
    We have Status-6. So you don’t have any methods against Kostya Saprykin. smile
  22. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 14 January 2016 13: 53 New
    +1
    Можно и пообсуждать. Только в таком ключе: "Вы учите географию и разбираете нахрен свою ПРО возле наших границ." Хотите защищать Корею и Японию - размещайте там, мы не против."
  23. AlexTires
    AlexTires 14 January 2016 13: 54 New
    0
    “We are open to dialogue with Russia on this issue,” he said. - But the key stumbling block, in my opinion, lies in Russia's confidence that our intentions are directed against it. We believe that we are able to show, technically and by other means, that we are actually worried about the threats. ”

    “It (the system) is directed against countries such as North Korea and Iran. That is why we have deployed additional missile defense resources in Northeast Asia in recent years.


    I will make a remark: the missile defense is not sent, but acts in a radius! Here prove, do not prove, but the fact is that their missile defense systems located in Europe, almost at our borders, can definitely hit flying objects (missiles, planes) on our territory. And they can change their intentions (order) at the very last moment and we won’t even know about it. For me, the statement that is so very strange and very supposed in some space, the question is, where does Iran and North Korea, if this missile defense is located in countries washed by the northern seas ...
  24. valent45
    valent45 14 January 2016 13: 56 New
    +3
    And the fact that in addition to missile defense is the advancement of troops and equipment to the borders of Russia,
    is it also against Iran and S. Korea? It’s like going to tanks and troops
    to cross through Russia to Iran and to S. Korea? Interesting girls are dancing!
  25. abc_alex
    abc_alex 14 January 2016 14: 00 New
    0
    The US foreign policy fraternity is increasingly slipping to the level of shkolota.
    Неужели кому-то может быть непонятно, что ПРО СШ не может быть направлена против Ирана или КНДР? Как система обороны может быть направлена против кого-то конкретно? Кто-нибудь когда нибудь видел танковую броню направленную исключительн против НАТО? Или корабельную броню "противосоветскую"?

    Obviously, this whole talking room will have one single purpose - to persuade, dodge, talk, but to slow down the modernization of our nuclear missile component of the strategic nuclear forces and the modernization of the Navy and Air Force. After all, it is obvious that, being a multiple more expensive US missile defense program, it simply does not keep pace with the development program of our means of attack.
  26. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 14 January 2016 14: 01 New
    +1
    Как же интересно это можно "prove"?

    Make a promise - we are so honest, it’s not against you, if war happens, we won’t use it against you? laughing

    Or put on our rockets its систему "friend or foe", чтобы ПРО не срабатывало? laughing

    Usual tactics - we will pretend that we are discussing, and we will quietly build ourselves.
  27. EvgNik
    EvgNik 14 January 2016 14: 02 New
    +2
    All that they could prove - they have already proved. Having destabilized the situation in the Middle East, having made color revolutions in neighboring countries. Redrawing the map of Europe and the Middle East. And we will not forget Ukraine. So they proved it. By deeds, not words.
  28. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 14 January 2016 14: 05 New
    +2
    Это вы в Гондурасе легко сможите доказать, что чёрное это белое, а с нами нынче такой фокус не прокатит. "Пой ласточка, пой" откуда ты хрен такой?
  29. udincev
    udincev 14 January 2016 14: 05 New
    0
    We believe that we are able to show - technically and by other means - that we are really worried about threats
    no need to puff proof. Just look geographically
  30. YaphetS
    YaphetS 14 January 2016 14: 12 New
    0
    Tra la la tra la la tra la la! And nothing else!
  31. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 14 January 2016 14: 16 New
    0
    What to negotiate with them? Let the loot continue to be invested in this crap, the more, the faster the printing press grunts. And the effectiveness of this cartoon does not guarantee them complete peace of mind beyond the puddle, nor when.
  32. sergei44442222
    sergei44442222 14 January 2016 14: 22 New
    0
    They want to politely talk with us and blur our vigilance, I hope Russia does not succumb to this lie.
  33. bmv04636
    bmv04636 14 January 2016 15: 01 New
    0
    Вот интересно когда мы поставим С-500 в Калининграде, в Крыму, в Белоруссии, а для их прикрытия Искандеры и калибры типа против даиша. "Светлые эльфы" против не будут а? laughing
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 14 January 2016 15: 14 New
    +1
    Так познания в географии советских граждан в расчет не берут,думают все в 90-х вымерли )). Расчет "на жертв ЕГЭ". Где ПРО, и где Иран? Впрочем ориентируются на среднестатистических американцев, равняют нас с собой! Помнится интервью у американцев на улице брали, просили показать на карте Ирак, забавное зрелище, один его вообще в Австралии обнаружил.
    И обратите внимание на лицо советника, "интеллектуальное лицо", не правда ли? Их что там,
    clone?
  36. ILIA
    ILIA 14 January 2016 15: 31 New
    0
    Stanislavsky as he said ..... - I DO NOT BELIEVE !!!!)
  37. Ros 56
    Ros 56 14 January 2016 16: 17 New
    +1
    For a long time already, all normal people realized for themselves that Americans like to ponte ponte, which in translation into Russian means - to lie like a gray gelding.
    It is enough to listen to their president, representatives of the State Department, the Pentagon, the OKNS, various advisers, politicians, and constantly lies, lies and lies. Tired of its simplicity. They claim that they are for democracy, for peace, but who most unleashed wars on the globe in the second half of the 20th century. It is they who can tell fairy tales to young people who are 20-30 years old, and who are 50 and older, especially those who directly faced these events themselves do not need to comb as they say.
  38. Lelek
    Lelek 14 January 2016 17: 35 New
    +1
    “The key point here is that Russia believes that this (PRO) threatens it. We believe that we are ready to show, both technically and by other means, that we are seriously concerned about the threat that comes from countries such as Iran and North Korea, ”said the adviser.

    Again a fairy tale about a bull. But the goby grew, grew and grew. Say this to your sirs and sirukhs, they will believe, but not us. bully
  39. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 14 January 2016 19: 18 New
    0
    Почему же до появления информации о "статусе" и разговора о ПРО не могло быть? Собственное "могущество" глазки застило?