White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense issues

62
Washington is ready for further discussion with Moscow of problems related to the expansion of missile defense, and intends to prove that the system is not directed against Russia, reports RIA News Statement by Advisor to American President Ben Rhodes.



“The key point here is that Russia believes that this (PRO) threatens it. We believe that we are ready to show, both technically and by other means, that we are seriously concerned about the threat that comes from countries such as Iran and North Korea, ”said the adviser.

“We are open to discussion,” Rhodes added.

“We are open to dialogue with Russia on this issue,” he said. - But the key stumbling block, in my opinion, lies in Russia's confidence that our intentions are directed against it. We believe that we are able to show, technically and by other means, that we are actually worried about the threats. ”

“It (the system) is directed against countries like North Korea and Iran. That is why in recent years we have deployed additional anti-missile resources in Northeast Asia. To protect himself, as well as the Republic of Korea, Japan and the entire region, ”Rhodes concluded.
  • http://russian.irib.ir/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    14 January 2016 13: 25
    Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?
    1. +9
      14 January 2016 13: 31
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense.

      Not screwed up. Under such hesitation, a missile defense system will be fully deployed by the end of 2018.
      1. +3
        14 January 2016 13: 47
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: NIKNN
        Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense.

        Not screwed up. Under such hesitation, a missile defense system will be fully deployed by the end of 2018.


        I think overexposed the idea of ​​missile defense, the Americans. Not for sale, horror story, more. The idea has fallen.
        1. +2
          14 January 2016 13: 53
          White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense issues

          Do you have problems with missile defense? smile Well, no, your problems are your problems, there’s nothing to discuss!
          1. cap
            0
            14 January 2016 14: 41
            Quote: SRC P-15
            White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense issues

            Do you have problems with missile defense? smile Well, no, your problems are your problems, there’s nothing to discuss!

            Well wait. Donkeys in a harness. hi
            1. +2
              14 January 2016 16: 32
              How can they prove it !!? And on occasion, as they usually do, they will take back their "proofs"! We, too, are not building a super torpedo against America) And we can prove it!)
            2. +2
              14 January 2016 23: 48
              I want to respond to every remark of the State Department with the words of a classic (and Sergey Lavrov) ....
      2. -1
        14 January 2016 15: 06
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: NIKNN
        Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense.

        Not screwed up. Under such hesitation, a missile defense system will be fully deployed by the end of 2018.

        Let it unfold. She does not catch calibers. Therefore, conversations began! Although a little earlier no one wanted to listen to our arguments! Everything has changed. The pro system has turned into scrap metal.
      3. +1
        14 January 2016 22: 49
        "White House: Washington is ready to continue discussing missile defense problems"
        That's what the life-giving "Status 6" does !!!! And our intercontinental strategic torpedo, with a charge of 100 or 200 megatons in a cobalt shell, will in no way be directed against the United States, England, Japan, and so on.
    2. +11
      14 January 2016 13: 33
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?

      Unfortunately, they didn’t stain the pants, they simply added mattresses to the usual spells against Iran, added North Korea, and the missile defense was deployed somewhere in Poland or the Czech Republic. To believe in these exceptional ones is to not respect yourself.
      1. +5
        14 January 2016 13: 46
        But we do not want to agree yet ... We are building up power! And then, perhaps, on our terms ... Russia can’t go to different treaties now .. DECEPE, again!
      2. +3
        14 January 2016 13: 48
        Quote: vlad66
        Unfortunately, they didn’t stain the pants, they simply added mattresses to the usual spells against Iran, added North Korea, and the missile defense was deployed somewhere in Poland or the Czech Republic. To believe in these exceptional ones is to not respect yourself.
        - To offer them to deploy a missile defense system in Russia is more effective. Against Korea ... laughing
    3. +2
      14 January 2016 13: 46
      Once we believed in the "sincere assurance" of the West and even signed a non-aggression pact in 1939. Everyone knows the consequences of what happened on June 22, 1941. Americans think we are masochists and will happily step on that rake one more time.
      1. 0
        14 January 2016 14: 50
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Once we believed in the "sincere assurance" of the West and even signed a non-aggression pact in 1939.


        Why once? And the second time they believed when they promised NATO not to expand. What we have as a result, everyone knows. So it remains for the third time to believe, God, because he loves the Trinity ...
    4. +5
      14 January 2016 13: 48
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?


      Mattresses drag on time and hope once again to make us talk. But it looks like this number is no longer passing.
    5. +1
      14 January 2016 13: 54
      This is a fairy tale about a white bull, they will not refuse
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +1
      14 January 2016 13: 58
      Yes, in principle, there is nothing to discuss. Take all this away from our borders and the theme itself will disappear.
    8. 0
      14 January 2016 20: 33
      Quote: NIKNN
      Not really matured, you see, crap one's pants with missile defense. and they themselves understood, and so why?

      Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.(I'm afraid of Danians and gifts that bring.)
      How predictable they are.
      All on one textbook!
      Today Poroshenko delivered a speech that Ukraine is ready for negotiations on debt, only now Russia is slow and delaying.
  2. HAM
    +7
    14 January 2016 13: 29
    Are they looking worse than themselves?
    1. +5
      14 January 2016 13: 34
      "intends to prove that the system is not directed against Russia"

      Do we need it? A discussion like that?
      The location coordinates of these systems are known, but nothing else is needed.
      1. 0
        14 January 2016 14: 43
        So our missile defense also
        against countries like North Korea and Iran
        , there can be no doubt in the USA. Don't you really believe us?
  3. +8
    14 January 2016 13: 29
    We can also write on our ICBMs that they are aimed at containing a possible Lunar intervention. We can even write fluorescent "To the Moon"
    1. +1
      14 January 2016 22: 09
      We are also very afraid of North Korea and Iran, so missiles must be delivered in Kaliningrad and ... in Cuba.
  4. Riv
    0
    14 January 2016 13: 29
    Probably the problem is that the American missile defense can only do that to neutralize the threat of North Korea (and most likely it cannot). Where was this system when two skyscrapers were demolished in Manhattan in half an hour?
    1. 0
      14 January 2016 13: 46
      Quote: Riv
      Where was this system when two skyscrapers were demolished in Manhattan in half an hour?


      At the design office))
      In general, there are already so many copies broken and articles written on this subject that not everything was as simple as they want to show us. And it’s very convenient and timely that these two Biongas demolished the towers, and the towers somehow strangely fell quickly, although they shouldn’t.
      MN-17 from the same opera, amers always did not give a damn about civilian casualties.
  5. +5
    14 January 2016 13: 29
    “It (the system) is directed against countries like North Korea and Iran. That is why in recent years we have deployed additional anti-missile resources in Northeast Asia. To protect himself, as well as the Republic of Korea, Japan and the entire region, ”Rhodes concluded.
    .. especially the missile defense base located in Poland .. how is it with geography? ... apparently .. not like .. laughing
  6. +5
    14 January 2016 13: 30
    As Stanislavsky would say: "I do not believe!"
    Vadim Luchkin. 1990

    "Do not believe the one who lied,
    All excuses are just nonsense.
    In your eyes so low fallen
    There is no more faith in her.

    Why now the words are empty,
    Let it be a holy lie
    Just let it go
    And you will regret, you yourself will understand:

    How vile, low was deceived,
    How the fog covered his eyes.
    Years will pass, in the past they will sink
    Grievances are those, but not deception.

    He's like a scar on thin skin
    He's like a thorn in your eye.
    Believe people, but remember, nevertheless,
    And a lie is capable of a tear.

    And what is so sincere
    Sometimes a veil of false phrases
    And the gaze blazes with innocence
    Without shy eyes
    .

    To her, who had forgiven the hope,
    Manage worthy to give an answer.
    Believe me, - once lied
    There is no more faith in anything. "
  7. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 31
    Of course, I apologize for another offtopic about my native land: about our "heroes" who need to be known by sight. Hands itch to the wall to put ...

    Krasnoyarsk City Council deputy Konstantin Senchenko posted a post today, January 14, in connection with yesterday’s statement by the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, about Russia's enemies. Recall, as reported by Interfax, Kadyrov made a statement.

    “People whom no one had heard anything before, climb over their heads to become famous for opposing themselves to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Representatives of the so-called non-systemic opposition are trying to cash in on a difficult economic situation. Such people should be treated as enemies of the people, as traitors. They have nothing sacred, ”the Interfax politician quoted as saying at a meeting with journalists in Grozny on the eve of Russian Press Day.

    In his post, Konstantin Senchenko writes: “Ramzan, you are a disgrace to Russia. You have discredited everything you can. You have discredited the title of Academician, because having 3 classes of education, you bear the title that was held by the greatest minds of Russia. <…> You have discredited the title of Hero of Russia. I remember the times when here in Krasnoyarsk we collected help for our guys who were going to fight in Chechnya. You then ran through the mountains and killed our guys. They now lie in the ground, and you are a hero of Russia (spelling and punctuation preserved). "

    The full text of the deputy’s statement is shown in the photo. In 4 hours, he scored more than 100 “likes” and more than 150 reposts, including from oppositionist Alexei Navalny.
    1. +5
      14 January 2016 13: 50
      I don’t know who Senchenko is, but if he has piled for him, then Kadyrov is right!
  8. +3
    14 January 2016 13: 31
    but I’m wondering how the missile defense system installed in Europe will protect the southern brown and Japan ... or do I have gaps in geography?
    1. 0
      14 January 2016 13: 34
      And who was going to defend them?
    2. 0
      14 January 2016 13: 56
      Quote: mpzss
      . or do I have gaps in geography?

      This is unlikely ... Just "exceptional" live in an alternate universe! And they also have maps of the world ... alternative. feel
    3. 0
      14 January 2016 14: 38
      Maybe they suggest that the Koreans have technologies for opening moleholes in order to bypass Russian territory and missile defense, respectively) ... hehe
    4. +1
      14 January 2016 22: 12
      Exceptional geography problems ... laughing
      John McCain: the capture of Mariupol will open the way for the militia to the Baltic fellow
  9. +2
    14 January 2016 13: 32
    The next part of the Marlezon ballet: "We want to control your territory and your nuclear forces because we are afraid of those who in the next decade may not have intercontinental delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons." They dragged on the old song, apparently, again someone was going to insert a missile defense element.
  10. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 32
    I wonder what they want for a missile defense? Syria? Ukraine? Or all together?
    IMHO, we must answer: We are not interested in your missile defense - we have "Statuses" from 1st to 6th! wink
  11. +2
    14 January 2016 13: 34
    They did not run into missile defense in Europe, because this system was sharpened for delivering the first strike against ground targets in the European part of Russia. It seems to me that the point here is somewhat different. It’s just that suddenly the USA turned out to be unprotected from our strategic cruise missiles launched from the Tu-95, Tu-160 in the Arctic. Therefore, they are being traded.

    How the Russian Air Force merges the American missile defense.
    http://putin-slil.livejournal.com/185684.html
  12. +2
    14 January 2016 13: 37
    That is why in recent years we have deployed additional missile defense resources in Northeast Asia.


    Well, finally recognized that the Poles, Romanians and others like them are the real ASIAN !!! And then they all bore - we are Europe
  13. +2
    14 January 2016 13: 38
    Maybe missile defense is aimed at protecting Russia? But we didn’t know ...
    Maybe to protect "friendly" missile defense systems to put our missiles there? Direct fire!
  14. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 40
    North Korea does not border France for an hour? It’s just about Europe, which means that those against whom it is directed should be close, so that missiles can fly close, otherwise the hour is uneven.
  15. Dam
    0
    14 January 2016 13: 42
    Not the first time I write, but I repeat: PRO is the same Mega fake as the SOI in front of it. There is nothing to discuss in principle. Another attempt to sell dead donkey ears at a reasonable price
  16. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 45
    This is not a missile defense, these are short- and medium-range missiles. Bypassing the contract. Put a nuclear head and fuck. Nay balovoe next. They can’t believe in any way that a screw with a thread is already near their assholes. Yegor traded in the market, enchanted the people, but Yegor fell on a thief, and his ego was enchanted.
  17. 0
    14 January 2016 13: 45
    Are they taking us for the finished? Or for your population? Then - yes, then of course! For this contingent, the version is just right ...
  18. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 46
    Mdaaa ... There is a missile defense - there is a problem, there is no missile defense - there is no problem.
  19. 0
    14 January 2016 13: 47
    “It (the system) is directed against countries like North Korea and Iran. That is why in recent years we have deployed additional anti-missile resources in Northeast Asia. To protect himself, as well as the Republic of Korea, Japan and the entire region, ”Rhodes concluded.
    prove ........ this is something like the Pythagorean theorem.
  20. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 49
    The point of no return has been passed. Everything is just chatter and a "smoke screen".
  21. 0
    14 January 2016 13: 51
    We have Status-6. So you don’t have any methods against Kostya Saprykin. smile
  22. +1
    14 January 2016 13: 53
    It is possible to discuss. Only in this vein: "You study geography and take the fuck out of your missile defense near our borders." If you want to defend Korea and Japan, place them there, we don't mind. "
  23. 0
    14 January 2016 13: 54
    “We are open to dialogue with Russia on this issue,” he said. - But the key stumbling block, in my opinion, lies in Russia's confidence that our intentions are directed against it. We believe that we are able to show, technically and by other means, that we are actually worried about the threats. ”

    “It (the system) is directed against countries such as North Korea and Iran. That is why we have deployed additional missile defense resources in Northeast Asia in recent years.


    I will make a remark: the missile defense is not sent, but acts in a radius! Here prove, do not prove, but the fact is that their missile defense systems located in Europe, almost at our borders, can definitely hit flying objects (missiles, planes) on our territory. And they can change their intentions (order) at the very last moment and we won’t even know about it. For me, the statement that is so very strange and very supposed in some space, the question is, where does Iran and North Korea, if this missile defense is located in countries washed by the northern seas ...
  24. +3
    14 January 2016 13: 56
    And the fact that in addition to missile defense is the advancement of troops and equipment to the borders of Russia,
    is it also against Iran and S. Korea? It’s like going to tanks and troops
    to cross through Russia to Iran and to S. Korea? Interesting girls are dancing!
  25. 0
    14 January 2016 14: 00
    The US foreign policy fraternity is increasingly slipping to the level of shkolota.
    Can it really be incomprehensible to someone that the US missile defense cannot be directed against Iran or the DPRK? How can a defense system be directed against someone in particular? Has anyone ever seen tank armor directed exclusively against NATO? Or "anti-Soviet" ship armor?

    Obviously, this whole talking room will have one single purpose - to persuade, dodge, talk, but to slow down the modernization of our nuclear missile component of the strategic nuclear forces and the modernization of the Navy and Air Force. After all, it is obvious that, being a multiple more expensive US missile defense program, it simply does not keep pace with the development program of our means of attack.
  26. +1
    14 January 2016 14: 01
    How interesting it can be "prove"?

    Make a promise - we are so honest, it’s not against you, if war happens, we won’t use it against you? laughing

    Or put on our rockets its system "friend or foe"so that the missile defense does not work? laughing

    Usual tactics - we will pretend that we are discussing, and we will quietly build ourselves.
  27. +2
    14 January 2016 14: 02
    All that they could prove - they have already proved. Having destabilized the situation in the Middle East, having made color revolutions in neighboring countries. Redrawing the map of Europe and the Middle East. And we will not forget Ukraine. So they proved it. By deeds, not words.
  28. +2
    14 January 2016 14: 05
    It is you in Honduras who can easily prove that black is white, but with us now such a trick will not work. "Sing swallow, sing" where the hell are you from?
  29. 0
    14 January 2016 14: 05
    We believe that we are able to show - technically and by other means - that we are really worried about threats
    no need to puff proof. Just look geographically
  30. 0
    14 January 2016 14: 12
    Tra la la tra la la tra la la! And nothing else!
  31. 0
    14 January 2016 14: 16
    What to negotiate with them? Let the loot continue to be invested in this crap, the more, the faster the printing press grunts. And the effectiveness of this cartoon does not guarantee them complete peace of mind beyond the puddle, nor when.
  32. 0
    14 January 2016 14: 22
    They want to politely talk with us and blur our vigilance, I hope Russia does not succumb to this lie.
  33. 0
    14 January 2016 15: 01
    It’s interesting when we will deliver the S-500 in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in Belarus, and to cover them with Iskander and anti-Daesh calibers. "Light elves" will not mind huh? laughing
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. +1
    14 January 2016 15: 14
    So the knowledge of geography of Soviet citizens is not taken into account, they think everyone died out in the 90s)). Calculation "on the victims of the exam". Where is the missile defense, and where is Iran? However, they are guided by the average American, they equate us with themselves! I remember interviewing Americans on the street, asking them to show Iraq on a map, a funny sight, one found it in Australia at all.
    And pay attention to the face of the advisor, the "intellectual face", isn't that so? What are they there,
    clone?
  36. 0
    14 January 2016 15: 31
    Stanislavsky as he said ..... - I DO NOT BELIEVE !!!!)
  37. +1
    14 January 2016 16: 17
    For a long time already, all normal people realized for themselves that Americans like to ponte ponte, which in translation into Russian means - to lie like a gray gelding.
    It is enough to listen to their president, representatives of the State Department, the Pentagon, the OKNS, various advisers, politicians, and constantly lies, lies and lies. Tired of its simplicity. They claim that they are for democracy, for peace, but who most unleashed wars on the globe in the second half of the 20th century. It is they who can tell fairy tales to young people who are 20-30 years old, and who are 50 and older, especially those who directly faced these events themselves do not need to comb as they say.
  38. +1
    14 January 2016 17: 35
    “The key point here is that Russia believes that this (PRO) threatens it. We believe that we are ready to show, both technically and by other means, that we are seriously concerned about the threat that comes from countries such as Iran and North Korea, ”said the adviser.

    Again a fairy tale about a bull. But the goby grew, grew and grew. Say this to your sirs and sirukhs, they will believe, but not us. bully
  39. 0
    14 January 2016 19: 18
    Why, before the appearance of information about the "status" and talk about missile defense, could there not have been? Own "power" obscured the eyes?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"