Military Review

Russian Foreign Ministry: Russia will not accept the composition of the delegation of the Syrian opposition, if it includes militants of terrorist groups

29
Following consultations with representatives of the American delegation in Geneva (Switzerland), Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Gennady Gatilov told the media that Russia considers negotiations with that delegation of the Syrian “democratic” opposition, which includes terrorists, to be unacceptable. According to Gennady Gatilov, Russia considers Ahrar al-Sham and Jaish al-Islam to be terrorist organizations that intend to bring their members into the mission of the Syrian opposition.


Russian Foreign Ministry: Russia will not accept the composition of the delegation of the Syrian opposition, if it includes militants of terrorist groups


Information Agency TASS cites a statement by a Russian diplomat:
We have confirmed our position. We see neither “Ahrar al-Sham” nor “Jaish al-Islam” among the opposition delegation, since these are terrorist organizations. We believe that the opposition delegation should be represented not by terrorist representatives, but by those forces that really support a political settlement. These two organizations are preachers of a military solution to the problem. We consider the main issue to be the compilation of a single list of the delegation of the opposition, which would be an interlocutor on the negotiation process with the government side. Unfortunately, we cannot fix any movement in this regard.


It should be recalled that the next Geneva meeting on the settlement of the Syrian conflict is scheduled for January 25. At the same time, the composition of the delegation of the so-called Syrian "democratic" opposition has already been formed in Riyadh. The Russian Foreign Ministry states that not only with the official Damascus, but with the Russian delegation, no one even tried to discuss the list.

It is known that the head of the coordinating council of the "democratic" opposition of Syria was elected a certain person by the name of Hijab. This same Hijab has already managed to blame the US President Obama for the fact that he is speaking from rather soft positions and accepts the conditions of Russia, under which Assad until the new election remains the Syrian president. Comments from the United States about the statements of the Hijab has not yet been reported.
Photos used:
Twitter
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. A-Sim
    A-Sim 14 January 2016 12: 37 New
    +8
    "... a certain person named Hijab was elected head of the coordination council of the" democratic "opposition of Syria."

    Who it??? Where ???

    Lump from the mountain of the State Department, not otherwise.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 14 January 2016 12: 57 New
      12
      All right, stand your ground! We won’t agree with the barmales, definitely! We have our own methods of "contract" ...
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 14 January 2016 13: 08 New
      11
      This same hijab has already managed to accuse US President Obama of acting in rather soft positions and accepting the conditions of Russia,

      Well, the fact that this hijab is drinking from one glass with Poroshenko rooster and bears exactly the same drunken nonsense, they already said, it means that the Foreign Ministry understood this and does not agree on anything with him, unless it is better to hang or put this Hijab on the stake.
      1. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 14 January 2016 13: 26 New
        +2
        As soon as the word "opposition" has the definition of "democratic" - it immediately becomes clear that these guys are being fed in the United States.
    3. Blondy
      Blondy 14 January 2016 16: 23 New
      0
      And, in general, whom does this opposition represent, with the exception of the Phashington and Saudi puppeteers? By origin, they are not local, but from Syria’s foreign friends, that is, mercenaries.
    4. Lelek
      Lelek 14 January 2016 18: 14 New
      0
      Quote: A-Sim
      Who it??? Where ???


      I climbed a bunch of sites, but I did not find this figure.
  2. Nik_One
    Nik_One 14 January 2016 12: 38 New
    +7
    There can only be one conversation with terrorists - a bullet in the forehead.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 14 January 2016 12: 47 New
      +5
      Quote: Nik_One
      There can only be one conversation with terrorists - a bullet in the forehead.

      It is considered mercy for them to die a warrior. It is necessary to hang up, because Allah does not accept zas.r.an.tsev to paradise.
      1. Sorokin
        Sorokin 14 January 2016 12: 53 New
        +1
        And there is. Bissmila rahmani .....
      2. papik09
        papik09 14 January 2016 13: 12 New
        0
        Quote: V.ic
        Quote: Nik_One
        There can only be one conversation with terrorists - a bullet in the forehead.

        It is considered mercy for them to die a warrior. Need to hang, for Allah does not accept the zas.r.an.tsev to paradise.

        ... by the neck ... drinks
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. dr.Bo
          dr.Bo 14 January 2016 13: 34 New
          0
          Quote: papik09
          Quote: V.ic
          Quote: Nik_One
          There can only be one conversation with terrorists - a bullet in the forehead.

          It is considered mercy for them to die a warrior. Need to hang, for Allah does not accept the zas.r.an.tsev to paradise.

          ... by the neck ... drinks

          / drinks
          BY COURT SENTENCE !!
          So that the whole world knows that: THE LAW IS THE LAW !!!
          1. Dam
            Dam 14 January 2016 13: 50 New
            0
            And wrap the corpses in pork skins
  3. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 14 January 2016 12: 41 New
    +2
    That's right!
    Need to "separate the grain from the chaff"!
    And then, look, you look, what cunning people were found ...)))
    In turn, you sons of bitches !!!
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 14 January 2016 12: 41 New
    +1
    In this situation, no compromises should be made so that the Americans do not sing. The world has already looked at the actions of these "moderate" in American style.
  5. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 14 January 2016 12: 41 New
    +2
    The competent move of our diplomats ...
  6. lysyj bob
    lysyj bob 14 January 2016 12: 42 New
    +1
    They are trying to legalize their gobbling thugs under the guise of delegates from the opposition.
  7. bif
    bif 14 January 2016 12: 44 New
    15
    While diplomats decide ..
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 14 January 2016 13: 13 New
      +2
      Quote: bif
      While diplomats decide ..

      + + + + +
      Sukhov is not on them. Although GDP is suitable lol
  8. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 14 January 2016 12: 45 New
    +1
    Cover everyone at once. angry
  9. V.ic
    V.ic 14 January 2016 12: 49 New
    +1
    That's right! Let’s start by washing with soap and brushing your teeth ...
  10. AlexTires
    AlexTires 14 January 2016 12: 50 New
    +2
    That's right, if an organization is not on the list of terrorists in the Gabon / Latvia lists, it does not mean that it is not a terrorist in Syria. Each country itself determines such a list based on its requirements ...
  11. Conscience
    Conscience 14 January 2016 12: 52 New
    0
    search it first, and then leave ... what - scold
  12. Dimontius
    Dimontius 14 January 2016 12: 54 New
    0
    If the Americans can extend their jurisdiction in the example of FIFA to the whole world, then why can't we do the same with the example of the terrorists in Geneva ?? Let everyone come, and we’re just shackled by terrorists and Kolyma!
  13. Wolka
    Wolka 14 January 2016 12: 56 New
    0
    tea this hijab will not live up to a meeting in Riad, the Yankees themselves will "sip" the talker
  14. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 14 January 2016 12: 57 New
    +5
    It is possible and necessary to come to an agreement with the opposition. But to do this not in Geneva, but on the ground (with individual field commanders). This is something that can be done really in the situation prevailing in Syria. And you can not even widely advertise the results and conditions of the agreements. Although diplomatic work will continue, and here not even Syria itself will be important, but a more significant strategic interest.
    1. Extraneous
      Extraneous 14 January 2016 13: 01 New
      +3
      And so it is now. There are enough examples of "transition" or change.
    2. vv3
      vv3 14 January 2016 14: 22 New
      0
      I agree, but to negotiate only with those who have established contact with our air forces, in the interests of which our aviation works. Why negotiate with those who do not affect the conduct of the war on our part and with those who do not represent anyone?
  15. askort154
    askort154 14 January 2016 13: 06 New
    0
    The Syrian problem can no longer be solved peacefully, diplomatically. Too large flock of jackals and vultures long for prey. As if their own army could not defend the country, strangers came.
    The same awaits Ukraine - the screenwriter and director are the same.
    The same fate was prepared for Russia.
  16. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 14 January 2016 13: 08 New
    0
    Well, let the Yankees figure it out with their scumbags and killers-we can not conduct any negotiations with anyone at all, but just continue to utilize them.
  17. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 14 January 2016 13: 14 New
    +4
    In order to negotiate, we have not yet avenged our pilot ... But we won’t agree with the American-Turkish mercenaries! (Even if oil costs $ 0) ...
  18. Dam
    Dam 14 January 2016 13: 51 New
    +2
    While we agree on whom to consider, who not to consider as opposition, you see the opponents will already end
  19. valent45
    valent45 14 January 2016 14: 24 New
    0
    In Syria, it seems to me, all the opposition in one way or another
    fought against Assad. It’s hard to see some good opposition.
    All must be silently wetted. negative
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 14 January 2016 17: 27 New
      0
      The truth is not yours! The opposition, even embarking on the path of armed confrontation with the state, is worthy of recognition and attention with its unconditional support for statehood, recognition of the strength of state law and willingness to negotiate with state representatives to achieve mutual understanding, long-term peace and integrity of the state based on a compromise!
  20. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 14 January 2016 17: 16 New
    0
    Quote: Stock Officer
    As soon as the word "opposition" has the definition of "democratic" - it immediately becomes clear that these guys are being fed in the United States.

    The only difference between the so-called Syrian democratic opposition, which is covered by the West, from the frank Islamic thugs-bandits is that the bandits-thugs cut their heads from left to right, and the opposition ... derts from right to left and do not advertise it!