Military Review

Media: Beijing is considering joining the antiterrorist operation in the Middle East

85
China may send military forces to fight the Daesh group, reports RIA News today's message is the Washington Times.




“Beijing is probably worried about the growing number of Chinese-born militants who joined the ISIS (IG),” said a US military official familiar with the discussion of the role of the PRC in fighting IG. “The question is on which side they (the Chinese forces) will be.”

According to the newspaper, "it is more likely that China will join the armed forces of the Russian Federation conducting operations in Syria, rather than join the international coalition to fight against Daesh under the leadership of the United States."

Earlier in late December, Fars reported that Iran called on China to join the fight against Daesh. This appeal was voiced during the stay of the Chinese delegation in Tehran.

"China could significantly increase support for regional stability by becoming a more active participant in the fight against DAISH," said Mohsen Rezai, an Iranian spokesman.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. mpzss
    mpzss 14 January 2016 10: 26 New
    +7
    the main thing here is that they (the Chinese) should be with us ...
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 14 January 2016 10: 29 New
      25
      Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned belay
      1. GYGOLA
        GYGOLA 14 January 2016 10: 34 New
        +4
        Better later than never.
        1. Temples
          Temples 14 January 2016 11: 10 New
          +2
          The question is on which side they (Chinese forces) will

          If Iraq asks the Chinese for help, then the Chinese will be on their side.
          If they take part in the war at the request of Iraq, they will render military support to Iraq.
          The enemy is common, but the fronts can be different.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. serzhserzh86
            serzhserzh86 14 January 2016 11: 35 New
            +5
            what does Iraq have to do with it? the article is about Iran.
            1. Talgat
              Talgat 14 January 2016 19: 31 New
              +2
              Quote: serzhserzh86
              what does Iraq have to do with it? the article is about Iran.

              Of course, not Iraq (formerly under amers and now under Iran’s influence), but Iran requires China to join the confrontation in the Middle East along with Russia, which would immediately swing the scales.

              But China has its “own” zone of opposition to the world aggressor - this is the Pacific Ocean - and the opponents there are almost the same - the USA with satellites and Japan instead of the Saudis

              Secondly, China is not yet “ready” —not equal to the USA in terms of GDP, etc. — here they wrote somewhere about the statements of the Chinese general (about all the recent clashes between Russia and the West) —says too early, still too early — still 10-15 and decide everything

              Most likely, China will not send troops or a fleet to Syria - it will help financially, financially, with deliveries, replacing Russia with sanctioned goods (here's an example to you recently - ship engines for the Russian Navy) - and diplomatically, as usual - in the UN Security Council, etc.
          3. aktanir
            aktanir 14 January 2016 11: 39 New
            +1
            China’s ground forces are unlikely to be sent, and because they, like the rest, will bomb their air force neither hot nor cold to anyone.
          4. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 14 January 2016 11: 45 New
            +1
            Quote: Temples
            If Iraq asks the Chinese for help, then the Chinese will be on their side. If they take part in the war at the request of Iraq, they will render military support to Iraq.

            Just not Iraq, but Iran)))
            In general, earlier there was already information about China’s readiness to send 5 troops to Syria. And against the backdrop of worsening relations between Iran and the Saudis, there is a likelihood of a threat of oil transportation in the Strait of Hormuz, a small proportion of which is consumed by China, which forces China to designate its presence to ensure its energy security.
          5. Deniska
            Deniska 14 January 2016 12: 58 New
            +1
            If Iraq asks the Chinese for help, then the Chinese will be on their side.
            If they take part in the war at the request of Iraq, they will render military support to Iraq.
            The enemy is common, but the fronts can be different.


            Earlier, in late December, Fars reported that Iran called on China to join the fight against Daesh.


            More attentively ...
      2. andre
        andre 14 January 2016 10: 35 New
        +7
        Buddhists !!! The Chinese will not fight, because they are too cunning. Hey Lus cada sakonchite, tada and we plid. No wonder they "sit on the shore and wait for the corpse of the enemy to pass by"
        1. good7
          good7 14 January 2016 10: 51 New
          0
          But Muslims will never stop! And Chinese philosophy completely impresses me! Scientific breakthrough, such that you envy and rejoice for a bright future!
        2. demo
          demo 14 January 2016 11: 16 New
          +4
          Or maybe they realized that the corpse of the enemy can swim along another river?
        3. Sura
          Sura 14 January 2016 11: 34 New
          +4
          Buddhists !!! The Chinese will not fight, because they are too cunning. Hey Lus cada sakonchite, tada and we plid. No wonder they "sit on the shore and wait for the corpse of the enemy to pass by"

          In 78g, when China attacked Vietnam, the media gave daily reports of Chinese casualties — many thousands in manpower and tens of tanks per day. He served in 77-79, after the end of this war a major came to us (he was an adviser to the Vietnamese), spoke to us in a soldier’s club and told us what gouging we were against the Chinese, I saw how the Chinese went on the attack and everything was exactly according to the charter .
          The regiment rises and march as if in a parade without bowing and not tacking to its full height, the machine guns did not have time to change overheated trunks, everything that could be fired (the Vietnamese did not pass 10 years after the war from the United States). The first regiment lay down the whole, the next got up behind it, also the whole lay down, and so on in a day, only two or three regiments fell on their site.
          According to the charter, the tank offensive is in columns, the first is knocked out because of it the next one creeps out and so in one place the tank company, battalion, regiment were knocked out.
          1. Onizuka teacher
            Onizuka teacher 14 January 2016 12: 13 New
            0
            Quote: Sura
            In 78g, when China attacked Vietnam, the media gave daily reports of Chinese casualties — many thousands in manpower and tens of tanks per day. He served in 77-79, after the end of this war a major came to us (he was an adviser to the Vietnamese), spoke to us in a soldier’s club and told us what gouging we were against the Chinese, I saw how the Chinese went on the attack and everything was exactly according to the charter .
            The regiment rises and march as if in a parade without bowing and not tacking to its full height, the machine guns did not have time to change overheated trunks, everything that could be fired (the Vietnamese did not pass 10 years after the war from the United States). The first regiment lay down the whole, the next got up behind it, also the whole lay down, and so on in a day, only two or three regiments fell on their site.
            According to the charter, the tank offensive is in columns, the first is knocked out because of it the next one creeps out and so in one place the tank company, battalion, regiment were knocked out.

            Is this tale true? No. Otherwise, they would have lost the war in Korea. Tales do not tell the sir, take the trouble to study the history of that war. Firstly, the PLA sent 44 divisions (fighting went along almost the entire line of the Vietnam-China border) and an offensive began in the early hours of February 17, 1979, and by March 4 Langshon was captured, opening the road to Hanoi. But here's what is interesting- The ships of the Pacific Fleet of the USSR since the summer of 1978 were in the area of ​​the South China and East China Seas, where they conducted exercises. By the beginning of 1979, a large squadron was concentrated in the South China Sea, which included 20 large warships by February 13. The Soviet fleet also used the former US naval base Camran in this area. By the end of February and the beginning of March 1979, the squadron received reinforcements and already consisted of 30 surface ships. China was aware that the USSR’s patience was not unlimited and that it would not endure a war with it, so peace was concluded on March 16th. And VOOOT, which is interesting, so the Vietnamese side announced that the losses of the Chinese amounted to 62 people killed - officially. So tryndet do not need sir.
            1. Sura
              Sura 14 January 2016 14: 21 New
              +1
              Loss reports were given primarily to the Vremya Channel 1 program, the official channel of the USSR. And I know about the ships, well-known data and the fact that we could be delayed by the demobilizer79 and sent there, because we knew the technique better (Cube), then we were told everything about it by the polit authorities and mentally, we had already begun to prepare in advance from the very beginning of the conflict , then there were many articles in various newspapers of military advisers and they all unanimously talked about the heavy losses of the Chinese, some made fun of the fact that China specifically unleashed this war in order to reduce the population. I made a typo instead of 79g, I gave 78g
              1. Onizuka teacher
                Onizuka teacher 14 January 2016 15: 52 New
                -1
                Quote: Sura
                Loss reports were given primarily to the Vremya Channel 1 program, the official channel of the USSR. And I know about the ships, well-known data and the fact that we could be delayed by the demobilizer79 and sent there, because we knew the technique better (Cube), then we were told everything about it by the polit authorities and mentally, we had already begun to prepare in advance from the very beginning of the conflict , then there were many articles in various newspapers of military advisers and they all unanimously talked about the heavy losses of the Chinese, some made fun of the fact that China specifically unleashed this war in order to reduce the population. I made a typo instead of 79g, I gave 78g

                Sir, the whole point is that after 16 days the Chinese captured strategic important points and put the Vietnamese mate in capturing Langshon. And the whole war was fought without the Air Force and Navy, purely infantry and artillery (tanks were useless, sir jungle), but the capture of Hanoi would force the USSR to enter the war against China and everyone knew that. In World War I, the British despised the Turks and underestimated them; they received a bloodbath under the Dardanelles, having at that time the best fleet in the world.
                1. Sura
                  Sura 14 January 2016 18: 19 New
                  0
                  Yes, I’m scratching your drum that you captured whom and for how much with the Navy or without the Navy with the Air Force or without the Air Force, that I’m writing completely blind for someone that 1 CHANNEL TIME PROGRAM, MAJOR, WHO SAW ITS OWN EYES, and you are trying to I am surprised that in Vietnam there is a jungle, some kind of a bathhouse under the Dardanelles, I have a Russian bathhouse and I’m soared in it, why do I need to go to a bathhouse under the Dardanelles? ... go to it yourself ...
                  1. Sura
                    Sura 14 January 2016 18: 44 New
                    0
                    For the most stupid - Channel 1 is a TV, and not a radio there, a chronicle from the battlefield is shown and watched by hundreds of millions of people of the USSR and the Vashav treaty, at least because it was the 1 CHANNEL of the USSR.
            2. YURIY888
              YURIY888 14 January 2016 15: 32 New
              0
              A modern Chinese researcher, referring to Chinese sources, reports about 22 dead and wounded from the Chinese side, and Vietnam said (his point of view was supported by Soviet sources) that 000 were killed. According to the American author Michael Klodfelter, both sides died 62 people [500] (that is, a total of 20). These numbers are probably somewhat overstated - according to the Stockholm Institute for Peace Research (SIPRI), about 000 people died in the war.
          2. Hydrograph
            Hydrograph 14 January 2016 13: 34 New
            0
            In the Primorsky Territory, men from the shift from the mine to the Chinese border, changed clothes and attack to the thorn, and so several times a day. And you speak only Vietnamese one left.
          3. wasjasibirjac
            wasjasibirjac 14 January 2016 14: 06 New
            0
            Quote: Sura
            The first regiment lay down the whole, the next got up behind it, also the whole lay down, and so on in a day, only two or three regiments fell on their site.
            According to the charter, the tank offensive is in columns, the first is knocked out because of it the next one creeps out and so in one place the tank company, battalion, regiment were knocked out.

            and THIS according to the combat charter?
            1. Sura
              Sura 14 January 2016 15: 39 New
              0
              The adviser said that the then charter of China read so.
              And what was our charter at the beginning of the Second World War? The whole war will go on the territory of the enemy, but how did it turn out? ... Therefore, the losses were also the largest in the beginning.
      3. Sharky
        Sharky 14 January 2016 10: 38 New
        0
        Well, as the numerous "expert elders" write:
        The Middle East will become the scene of wars in which Russians will take part. A lot of blood will be shed, and even the Chinese will cross the Euphrates River, having 200.000.000 army, and reach Jerusalem. A characteristic sign that these events are approaching will be the destruction of the Omar mosque, since its destruction will mean the beginning of work on the reconstruction of the temple of Solomon, which was built on that spot.
        So everything can be ...
        http://www.iarex.ru/articles/45057.html
        1. good7
          good7 14 January 2016 11: 15 New
          +1
          Well, as the numerous "expert elders" write:
          The Middle East will become the scene of wars in which Russians will take part. A lot of blood will be shed, and even the Chinese will cross the Euphrates River, having 200.000.000 army, and reach Jerusalem. A characteristic sign that these events are approaching will be the destruction of the Omar mosque, since its destruction will mean the beginning of work on the reconstruction of the temple of Solomon, which was built on that spot.
          So everything can be ...
          http://www.iarex.ru/articles/45057.html Ктулху не проснется?
          1. Sharky
            Sharky 14 January 2016 11: 23 New
            +1
            It is unknown, but in any case, we are sitting on the sidelines and competently observing with little seeds in the cam. hi laughing
          2. PSih2097
            PSih2097 14 January 2016 11: 36 New
            -1
            Quote: good7
            Cthulhu won't wake up?

            No, Master Chief will draw ...
      4. avt
        avt 14 January 2016 10: 55 New
        +1
        Quote: NIKNN
        Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned

        No, they have long agreed with Assad to restore the destroyed one in a row, and Assad promised us a license for oil and gas, and publicly without different tenders, he said that he would be granted. It’s just that the Chinese waited for the type to become clear which way it’s going to swing, and they’re driving a sting in the form of, maybe it’ll come in. “Like, and we plowed”
        Quote: SAM 5
        A cunning Chinese man waits for his suit to lie down.

        Exactly so, but, they’ll break the site with pegs ”- verbal runs are made.
      5. Observer2014
        Observer2014 14 January 2016 10: 55 New
        +3
        Media: Beijing is considering joining the antiterrorist operation in the Middle East
        Beijing needs to choke faster. And then, without military victories, China cannot be a superpower.
      6. SAM 5
        SAM 5 14 January 2016 10: 58 New
        0
        Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned

        China's geopolitical interests are not there. This is Afghanistan, Taiwan, Singapore. If we take strategic interest, this is practically the whole world for them.
        1. good7
          good7 14 January 2016 11: 06 New
          0
          Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned
          China's geopolitical interests are not there. This is Afghanistan, Taiwan, Singapore. If we take strategic interest, this is practically the whole world for them. And what are you afraid of trading you take off there will be nothing? What terrible Chinese people are: they blow up planes, rape local women, cut off their heads and force them to learn Mao’s sayings by beating off the floor with his forehead!
      7. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 14 January 2016 11: 09 New
        0
        Media: Beijing is considering joining the antiterrorist operation in the Middle East
        will carry out a "cleansing" of the territory, in small groups of a million people ...
      8. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 14 January 2016 11: 24 New
        0
        um ... well, what's up ... the Chinese in igil?))) what a multinational pro-American organization, but this is igil)))
      9. Now we are free
        Now we are free 14 January 2016 11: 24 New
        +2
        Quote: NIKNN
        Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned belay

        From me + Nikolay hi
        China does not fit in until the last, weighing all the risks Pros and Cons. Of course, one could skip this thought issue from CNN, But if the Iranian representative really voiced the invitation to China to participate in the "Syrian disco", then this question / invitation was discussed with China on closed sidelines ...
        In any case, the actual participation of the PRC in the "Syrian disco" will mean that, not that the PRC has actively taken up the eradication of the world evil of Daesh. And the fact that China wants to fuck its own piece in the division of Syria in the form of the appearance there of the Navy / Air Force bases of China or profitable contracts in post-war Syria / Iraq ...

        China is a barometer of both the global economy and global geopolitics, we will look at the action of the Middle Kingdom in the near future.
      10. GRAY
        GRAY 14 January 2016 13: 09 New
        +1
        Quote: NIKNN
        Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned

        This is the media that’s scamming what the Chinese really want, nobody knows (except the Chinese themselves).
        There is a 50/50 probability - either the troops will be sent or not. lol
      11. wasjasibirjac
        wasjasibirjac 14 January 2016 14: 03 New
        0
        Quote: NIKNN
        Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned belay

        what will we share, and between whom? Putin has repeatedly declared the territorial integrity of Syria. there remains only Iraq, in which there are so many different sides, it is already difficult to choose whom to support.
    2. good7
      good7 14 January 2016 10: 49 New
      +1
      Again sarcasm, and with whom should they be with Turkey? Oh, help the Uyghur issue be resolved using the Banco methods! By the way, they have a great fleet!
    3. vlad66
      vlad66 14 January 2016 10: 49 New
      11
      The question is, in whose coalition they will be, in ours or in the mattress or, as always, will be watched from the side.
      1. good7
        good7 14 January 2016 11: 08 New
        0
        The question is, in whose coalition they will be, in ours or in the mattress or, as always, will be watched from the side. You are straight geopolitics with a capital letter! I put it in the American one since they cooperate especially clearly near Taiwan
    4. Oleneboy_
      Oleneboy_ 14 January 2016 11: 16 New
      +1
      They will be with us. They remember well and did not forget who helped them in World War II! And how many of ours then died for the PRC
      1. good7
        good7 14 January 2016 11: 24 New
        0
        The question is, in whose coalition they will be, in ours or in the mattress or, as always, will be watched from the side.
        Reply Quote Report Abuse

        AvatarMayor
        good7 (2) RU Today, 11:08 ↑
        The question is, in whose coalition they will be, in ours or in the mattress or, as always, will be watched from the side. You are straight geopolitics with a capital letter! I put it in the American one since they cooperate especially clearly near Taiwan
        Reply Quote Change Report abuse
        Oleneboy_ (2) RU Today, 11:16 ↑ New
        They will be with us. They remember well and did not forget who helped them in World War II! And how many of ours then died for the PRC. That was sarcasm!
    5. Zheka40
      Zheka40 14 January 2016 12: 15 New
      0
      And who else should they be with? Got what you said?
  2. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 14 January 2016 10: 26 New
    +6
    The Chinese are funny :) We want ... No, we don’t want ... No, still we want ... What, the war in Syria has already ended ?! Well, then it’s not fate ... Confucians :)
  3. SAM 5
    SAM 5 14 January 2016 10: 26 New
    +3
    A cunning Chinese man waits for his suit to lie down.
  4. A-Sim
    A-Sim 14 January 2016 10: 26 New
    0
    It's time to decide.
  5. OlegV
    OlegV 14 January 2016 10: 28 New
    0
    If the PRC intervenes ....... well then EVERYTHING, the kapets will come to extremists,
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 14 January 2016 10: 30 New
    +1
    They won’t wait where they don’t go.
  8. nizrum
    nizrum 14 January 2016 10: 32 New
    +1
    They’ll climb into Syria ... I think Afghanistan ... and closer, and their interests are more ... and the IGilovites are full there ...
    1. udincev
      udincev 14 January 2016 11: 17 New
      +1
      I think the Chinese have enough panamokas and here and there to throw DAISH. With their Chinese desire, of course.
  9. Baloo
    Baloo 14 January 2016 10: 33 New
    +1
    China may send military forces to fight the Daesh group, RIA Novosti reports today’s Washington Times report.

    May direct, or may not direct. Like in that joke about the wolf and the little red riding hood: do you want to crucify me? Maybe five times, maybe six times. bully
    When the tigers weaken in the fight with each other, a wise monkey will come down from the tree and take everything. Doesn't it seem like Confucius? bully
    1. nimboris
      nimboris 14 January 2016 12: 07 New
      +1
      Sun Tzu said so in his stratagems
  10. The black
    The black 14 January 2016 10: 33 New
    +2
    It is hoped that in Beijing they still decide to move from words to actions and join the Russian operation against Daesh in the foreseeable future.
  11. evil partisan
    evil partisan 14 January 2016 10: 34 New
    +1
    And if Kim Jong-un sends his troops to Syria and defeats the MGIL, he will be counted? Can sanctions be weakened or removed altogether? He needs to throw such an idea ... repeat
    1. Great-grandfather of Zeus
      Great-grandfather of Zeus 14 January 2016 10: 47 New
      +1
      Angry partisan, you, along with the idea and technology, toss him a newer one!
  12. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 14 January 2016 10: 35 New
    +1
    World War III on the nose, it's time to train the army. Even the Chinese got it.
  13. morpogr
    morpogr 14 January 2016 10: 36 New
    +7
    In light of the fact that the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region remains a sore point in China, circumstances are forcing China to act proactively to stop this infection at the approaches. Since Russia is doing this in Syria, it is natural that China will enter into a coalition with Russia.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 14 January 2016 11: 34 New
      0
      I will support you so as not to repeat.
  14. pts-m
    pts-m 14 January 2016 10: 36 New
    +2
    It would have long been necessary to join Russia. There, the experience gained in combat conditions is valued more than that gained at the training grounds.
  15. Sorokin
    Sorokin 14 January 2016 10: 39 New
    +2
    The Chinese are tricky tv .. beetles at the lowest cost to get the most acceptable result. I know they studied in the same class. As we press the nozzle let go. We let the heroes go.
  16. askort154
    askort154 14 January 2016 10: 40 New
    +1
    Come on, come on - China! Make up your mind! Only - land option! There is plenty of air there.
  17. Gor-1974
    Gor-1974 14 January 2016 10: 40 New
    +1
    It seems to me that it is better to do without the help of China in this matter. And then you can stay with your nose yourself and, as an encouragement to the expended resources, get Assad's friendly squeeze. It’s like a second front during the Second World War, the Allies arrived just in time, right to the division of the “pie”
    1. good7
      good7 14 January 2016 10: 52 New
      +1
      They are not looking for good from good! And what do you want to fuck from torn land?
  18. Rom14
    Rom14 14 January 2016 10: 40 New
    +1
    Quote: NIKNN
    Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned belay

    Most likely oil resources ...
  19. Lelek
    Lelek 14 January 2016 10: 41 New
    +4
    The policy of "a monkey sitting on a mountain and watching a tiger fight with a crocodile" helped China many times, but not this time. Considering the large number of Muslims in the separatist-minded areas of China (and "crushed" with the help of the Chinese army), they can blaze in them, as it did in BV. So, the “smart monkey” will have to make a decision and join the fighters with the Daesh, and the sooner she makes this decision, the better it will be for the “under heaven”. yes
  20. Woodman
    Woodman 14 January 2016 10: 43 New
    +1
    In general, if we could not do without a ground operation in Syria, then the Chinese would fall into the topic. And Westerners, along with the Turks, would be easier to squeeze out of there, and we would have had less losses. But this is if a ground operation is planned. Although the Chinese Air Force would be useful there. In general, China is still trying to act more or less lawfully, so if it gets into Syria, it will only be in alliance with us, because no one has called the United States coalition, and we are there at the request of the legitimate government.
  21. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 14 January 2016 10: 44 New
    +3
    To carry out a ground operation of the PLA in Azerbaijan, this is an unattainable dream. They have been preparing for operations abroad since 2020. Aircraft, to help us, I think in the sky and so closely. Tanks, artillery, drones this AR would be needed.
    He may have an interest in the future wreckage of Turkey, as the direction of the Silk Road.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 14 January 2016 10: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      He may have an interest in the future wreckage of Turkey, as the direction of the Silk Road.

      That's just to hell with them, not the Bosphorus with the Dardanelles!
  22. bad
    bad 14 January 2016 10: 45 New
    +1
    Quote: NIKNN
    Well, since China wants to join, the division of territories is planned belay
    ... rather, spheres of influence in the Middle East .. like mattresses, it is afraid of strengthening the influence of RUSSIA .. and they are still worn with their own “silk road” like a fool with a written bag .. when the victory is close, there are so many “winners” will come out for free-grinning .. laughing
  23. Give the light
    Give the light 14 January 2016 10: 47 New
    0
    ... China is our first enemy ... what do you think ... where will it go ... of course in the international coalition ... they sleep and see the Russian Federation as Chinese ...
    1. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 14 January 2016 11: 28 New
      0
      Quote: Give the light
      ... China is our first enemy ... what do you think ... where will it go ... of course in the international coalition ... they sleep and see the Russian Federation as Chinese ...

      Can they themselves come in without asking anyone what they should be afraid of? And why share such a delicious cake, with oil, land, and indeed the location? Putin told us there is no need to have a base there. The Chinese are wise people, they’ll pick up everything that’s bad, they’ll put their base in there, and once and for all, then we should not only ask the Turks, but can we go to the Mediterranean? So also the Chinese, but can the Mediterranean? You can laugh at it, but knowing the Chinese, to be sad.
  24. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 14 January 2016 10: 47 New
    +1
    So this is the next Times crowed, is it worth listening to? I wonder how the Chinese intervention might look in practice? They won’t climb on the ground, they’ll settle in Iran at the airport, and they will distill 30 aircraft. In my opinion, they will have only one goal in them - to learn from us the effectiveness of work, then to reduce all this and implement it in the news, in the light of a large-scale reform, so to speak.
  25. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 14 January 2016 10: 50 New
    +1
    Now they rush-run all over China! Beat the face of the Washington Potts correspondent
  26. nik1321
    nik1321 14 January 2016 10: 53 New
    +2
    The entry of China into the war on terrorism in Syria (especially the ground forces) - this would probably not be bad news ... Sponsors of terrorists would go too far, to collect bandits around the world - for this meat grinder .. Yes and China a huge bonus - as a fighter against the world evil .And so that China enters into this war-let the politicians try to persuade him.
  27. Privat
    Privat 14 January 2016 10: 54 New
    +3
    Quote: morpogr
    In light of the fact that the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region remains a sore point in China, circumstances are forcing China to act proactively to stop this infection at the approaches.
    It is unlikely that the Chinese will climb south. Most likely they will declare their Uyghur separatists accomplices of the Daesh that they are not far from the truth (they already cut people at the train station in China), and they will cleanse Xinjiang under the banner of the fight against terrorists.
    Since this is close to our border, we, perhaps, will not be worse.
  28. Dimontius
    Dimontius 14 January 2016 11: 10 New
    +2
    with this China is a double-edged sword. here the key question is “how and where will it go?”. The Western coalition is a slap in the face to us, in and of itself - the question is "why?" - in order to become more geopolitically significant ?? it’s possible, but they won’t score a lot of points, and everyone knows that including China itself! well, it’s too good for us in the coalition, that would be true. To be honest, I’m honestly now. Let the Chinese, well, since you love “Office Romance” as we do, well, don’t let us down, millennial partners and neighbors! enough to be practical, take the side already!
    1. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 14 January 2016 11: 21 New
      0
      "Russian with Chinese brothers forever," century is a definite concept, century, unfortunately not centuries.
  29. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 14 January 2016 11: 14 New
    0
    They want to grab their piece of jam cake. Or they can by themselves without us and “theirs”, without joining anyone, it’s quite in the spirit of the Chinese, and it’s in their hands, why share the cake then)). Chinese proverb, - "Where the foot of the Chinese stepped, consider China")).

    The predictions of Paisius the Holy Mountaineer begin to take shape, only there about Turkey, is it already right before our eyes?
  30. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 14 January 2016 11: 23 New
    +3
    The Chinese will wait until the last and significantly be silent ... But when it remains to finish off a couple of donkeys and the time comes to divide the nishtyaks, then the formidable Chinese army will "show itself" in the fight against terrorists.
    When Russia with the ATS will knock out the hairy-nosed from the densely populated areas, only the desert will remain, then China will enter into counter-operation.
    Well, maybe they are afraid of embarrassment ... Will the Chinese army be as effective as in the parade? So far, after all, it has not waged hostilities, even local ones ...
    1. good7
      good7 14 January 2016 11: 35 New
      +2
      The Chinese will wait until the last and significantly be silent ... But when it remains to finish off a couple of donkeys and the time comes to divide the nishtyaks, then the formidable Chinese army will "show itself" in the fight against terrorists.
      When Russia with the ATS will knock out the hairy-nosed from the densely populated areas, only the desert will remain, then China will enter into counter-operation.
      Well, maybe they are afraid of embarrassment ... Will the Chinese army be as effective as in the parade? So far, after all, it has not waged hostilities, even local ones ...
      What kind of mother is his nishtyaki? Oil less than $ 30 This is a ruined country there except for tangerines, which now have nothing to take more expensive than oil! Justice, protection of the weak for you are these feelings?
  31. maxxdesign
    maxxdesign 14 January 2016 11: 23 New
    +1
    well and normal) we are from the air ... the Chinese on the ground ... they stupidly crush the amount) for one igilovets 20 Chinese
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 15 January 2016 00: 27 New
      0
      Quote: maxxdesign
      well and normal) we are from the air ... the Chinese on the ground ... they stupidly crush the amount) for one igilovets 20 Chinese


      But are they not afraid of the hour? From the air - it’s problematic, because they don’t have their own jeepies-glonass yet, to miss - how to pee on your fingers ... shame will turn out. Has anyone seen Chinese BTA aircraft? And how many of them, how about supplies? The sea is far, but possible. In theory . No, it cannot be, China is simply not ready to get a club, early, it will wait, I think so. Under the guise of Uyghurs, he is filtering himself and designating his presence. I don’t eat it in my life - the Western way of life is alien to them, for us too - the loot god is not a god for the Russian man, there seems to be no insurmountable contradiction between us, but here you go ... We are looking at each other from the trenches, and they still have tangerines with a Soviet education, what will come next.
  32. KOSMOS
    KOSMOS 14 January 2016 11: 36 New
    +1
    The Chinese are very pragmatic. You can’t take them for emotions! In Syria, they have no special interests! Perhaps not yet!
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 14 January 2016 11: 40 New
      0
      China has the same interest in Syria as all other players. A wise monkey is waiting for everyone to become exhausted.
    2. Red_Hamer
      Red_Hamer 14 January 2016 11: 42 New
      0
      Maybe there is, most likely there is, but no one will tell us about this ahead of time. Well, as they put their military base there. We don’t need a base there, the president said, no one else)).
  33. cniza
    cniza 14 January 2016 11: 48 New
    +3
    Quote: aktanir
    China’s ground forces are unlikely to be sent, and because they, like the rest, will bomb their air force neither hot nor cold to anyone.



    So it is true, but they also have many Muslims who are now "hanging out" there, so I think they will connect, but without infantry.
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. NDR-791
    NDR-791 14 January 2016 11: 55 New
    0
    Beijing is probably concerned about the growing number of Chinese-born militants who have joined Daesh (IS), the US military official told the publication, familiar with the discussion of the role of China in the fight against IS. “The question is which side they (the Chinese forces) will be on.”
    And on whose? Oh, that official’s last name! If Beijing is worried about its membership in the IS, is the party understandable, or did the "official" simply admit that we and the sashiki are on different sides? And he only confirmed it.
  36. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 14 January 2016 11: 57 New
    +2
    ISIS fighters seem to be volunteering to test new and recycle old weapons. If there is such a desire, then as in the saying - "Master of the master" ...
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 14 January 2016 12: 33 New
    +1
    When information appeared last year that China was sending an aircraft-carrying ship to the Middle East, I was very enthusiastic. China, with the support of Russian aviation, could land ISIS very quickly with ground troops. However, this did not happen. And I think it won’t happen.

    “Wars and revolutions do not solve problems. The only solution is the industrial revolution, industry and capital. China knows what war and crisis are dangerous for its economy, and will never get involved either in crisis or in war».

    (From a speech by General Qiao Liang to graduates of the Defense University of China, July 2015)
  39. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 14 January 2016 13: 00 New
    +2
    China likes to watch from outside; rise above (from their point of view) fools, and receive dividends.

    If he participates, it means that he is very hot.
  40. sleeping sayan
    sleeping sayan 14 January 2016 13: 25 New
    -1
    Barkhan. "Will the Chinese army be just as effective. Introducing hostilities, even local ones, it didn’t. Yes, but 2 (two) conflicts with India, conflict with Vietnam. In 90 (nineties) the Chinese, the army and the police crushed the Uyghur uprising, in Urumqi, Kashgar. They acted tough and decisively. And effectively.
  41. koshmarik
    koshmarik 14 January 2016 13: 26 New
    +1
    I think that it’s not far off when Belarus and Kazakhstan join the coalition. You never know. They will establish smuggling from Ukraine and enter.
  42. Hydrograph
    Hydrograph 14 January 2016 13: 41 New
    0
    Quote: Mama_Cholli
    ISIS fighters seem to be volunteering to test new and recycle old weapons. If there is such a desire, then as in the saying - "Master of the master" ...

    I did not have time to write. I join !!!
  43. YURIY888
    YURIY888 14 January 2016 15: 47 New
    +1
    "China could significantly increase support for regional stability by becoming a more active participant in the fight against DAISH," said Mohsen Rezai, an Iranian spokesman.


    China originally helped and is helping Syria !!! Iran asks China to become a more active participant, along with the Russian Federation and Iran.
  44. Zomanus
    Zomanus 15 January 2016 03: 44 New
    0
    Let's see how China helps.
    Perhaps only a weapon
    because ISIS is an American topic and direct confrontation
    may come across China's financial market.
  45. PatriotKZ
    PatriotKZ 15 January 2016 07: 51 New
    0
    China's accession to the fight against terrorism in Syria is necessary for China itself. Firstly, it is a test of their ability and combat readiness of military personnel. Secondly, test your military equipment and weapons. Secondly, China is not required to show the world i.e. That the Americans would not climb their nose along the disputed islands of the southern seas of China. There is a Chinese proverb if you want the world getting ready for war, about this proverb Putin V.V. spoke. Thirdly, China is one of the powers of the world and, as an ally of the Russian Federation, cannot remain on the side since the coalition led by America does not support the fight against terror of the Russian Federation in Syria. And fourthly, and most importantly, China over the past 50 years, if I’m not mistaken, hasn’t fought anyone, and this, to put it mildly, relaxes the combat readiness of the armies or you can tell not to know in pure terms what your own army is capable of.