Military Review

In the defense industry began testing multicopter equipped with grenade launchers

78
In the "United Instrument-Making Corporation" (part of Rostec), they began to test the first samples of shock copters armed with grenade launchers, reports TASS message of the representative of the enterprise.


In the defense industry began testing multicopter equipped with grenade launchers
Archival photo.

“Testing copters have already begun. They are held under conditions as close as possible to the fighting, ”said the representative of the military-industrial complex.

According to him, “drones are subjected to various tests: they are fired from an automatic weapons from the ground, to test for survivability, they are trying to “land” using various means of electronic warfare ”.

"And the copters show themselves very well," said the source. “But it’s too early to talk about the end of tests.”

Earlier, the general director of the defense industry, Alexander Yakunin, told the agency about the creation of several types of UAVs for various tasks.

“We have already created samples of a copter scout, an observer-spotter of fire, a shock and a cargo copter. They can offline monitor objects and perform special maneuvers during the shelling, which makes them practically invulnerable to small arms, ”said the general director.
Photos used:
Alexander Ryumin / TASS
78 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 13 January 2016 18: 09 New
    10
    Very interesting.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 13 January 2016 19: 01 New
      12
      Then the tests must be transferred to Syria. We need to check how you can conduct a ground operation against terrorists using military robots.
      1. Tor5
        Tor5 13 January 2016 19: 29 New
        +2
        Right! Testing finally - in Syria!
        1. Vorobey-1
          Vorobey-1 13 January 2016 21: 05 New
          +2
          Well done, maybe we’ll reach this level:
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Nick
        Nick 13 January 2016 21: 29 New
        +4
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        Then the tests must be transferred to Syria. We need to check how you can conduct a ground operation against terrorists using military robots.

        So already ... In nete there was infa that Russia for the first time in the world used combat robots when taking altitude in Latakia.
        “For the first time in the world, the Russian Armed Forces carried out an attack on the fortified area of ​​militants with combat robots. In the province of Latakia, the army units of the Syrian army, with the support of Russian paratroopers and Russian combat robots, took the strategic height of 754,5, the Siriator Tower.
    3. KAV
      KAV 13 January 2016 19: 32 New
      +3
      This is already serious. Well done! I was at Interpolitech in 2015, I saw there interesting models of copters, for various tasks. Really, ours know how to do when necessary!
    4. UREC
      UREC 13 January 2016 20: 35 New
      +2
      Yes, God did not create man, but the devil. How many brains are working around the world and the money is spent to create tools for killing their own kind.
      1. KAV
        KAV 13 January 2016 20: 45 New
        12
        Correction He did not create only some of them, but he devoured it, the devil ... Having promised endless nishtyaks and immortality. Here they are, these nits, all the time and try to capture someone else's, and with resistance - to kill. But, substituting the second cheek for a second blow with a hand is a direct path to extinction, and this commandment is sometimes interpreted incorrectly. Therefore, in some cases, these tools are primarily a means of protection and survival, and not a means of destroying their own kind.

        And now, the two most prominent representatives of those absorbed by the devil and absorbing someone else's good (and maybe the sons of the devil):
        1. Rom14
          Rom14 14 January 2016 07: 56 New
          +2
          Well, funny faces (!), I don’t believe that these are people ???
        2. Rom14
          Rom14 14 January 2016 07: 56 New
          0
          Well, funny faces (!), I don’t believe that these are people ???
      2. rati
        rati 13 January 2016 23: 39 New
        +5
        One must struggle with another's appetite for wealth, otherwise they will devour it. The armada has already been assembled, but for now it’s scary to go to Russia for the third time.
      3. Nick
        Nick 14 January 2016 18: 51 New
        0
        Quote: UREC
        Yes, God did not create man, but the devil. How many brains are working around the world and the money is spent to create tools for killing their own kind.

        Do not blaspheme.
  2. dr.star75
    dr.star75 13 January 2016 18: 10 New
    +5
    I would still take a look ... And it's so cool.
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 13 January 2016 18: 24 New
      +1
      Quote: dr.star75
      I would still take a look ... And it's so cool.

      Amerikos hitched a machine gun to the copter
      https://youtu.be/SNPJMk2fgJU
      1. MolGro
        MolGro 13 January 2016 18: 45 New
        +5
        recoil is somehow different) border and gun
        )
        1. KVIRTU
          KVIRTU 13 January 2016 19: 54 New
          +2
          Yeah .
          "When testing the GP-25 in the troops, another unpleasant recoil effect was revealed - when fired from a grenade launcher the receiver cover fell off machine, held, as you know, by the head of the rod of the return spring. "
          And it's just a Bonfire.
          Hopefully, the grenade here is reactive, with almost no recoil.
          1. Sorokin
            Sorokin 13 January 2016 20: 58 New
            +1
            But it was personally pawed 1988 but only after the 2nd shot. And even after the box is reshooted after the first GP shot at the oar with plastic.
      2. Alexdark
        Alexdark 13 January 2016 18: 53 New
        +1
        Famous dude, does montages. This is just a graphic)
    2. opus
      opus 13 January 2016 19: 26 New
      +9
      Quote: dr.star75
      I would still have a look at the photo.

      "Raven-700" (pictured with fire bombs)

      Since 2007, this device has been transported to exhibitions, hanging an automatic machine on it, the grenade launcherthen a hydraulic breaker.

      Although this is not a "copter", but it says

      "As a payload on copters, conventional serial hand grenade launchers and flamethrowers are used."


      On the trifle shown below "ordinary serial hand grenade launchers" do not put

      (TC "star" shows this)



      (TASS shows this)

      1. Dmitry Toderes
        Dmitry Toderes 13 January 2016 20: 17 New
        +3
        Here is the copter that opus mentioned is garbage at all - you just look at it - the camera is civil! Yes, and probably Chinese. This is not a copter, this is baby talk. Here is that drone-helicopter that the very first one is even more or less decent - at least it can be seen that it was not created from Chinese consumer goods.

        PS The company logo is visible on the camera. Is that advertising Korean (or Japanese) firms? It’s not embarrassing for TASS to show it - I myself can assemble such a copter. But what about import substitution? - After all, you need to develop your own high-quality digital cameras by yourself, but only to the little sharashka (I can’t call this sharashka KB) that “developed” this “Russian” miracle copter is simply laziness. It’s easier to buy all the parts at the local radio market.
  3. ded100
    ded100 13 January 2016 18: 10 New
    +3
    A very useful thing in the army, we hope that the tests will be successful and our army will receive them in sufficient quantities!
  4. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 13 January 2016 18: 13 New
    +5
    Quadcopter is how many screws? quadra -4, hecto-6. Tricks ..don't give out military secrets laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Rader
      Rader 13 January 2016 18: 32 New
      +6
      Quadcopter is how many screws?

      MUCH is said - means LOT of these screws, the rest is not supposed to know! They themselves said: military secret. laughing
      I’m more interested not in the number of screws, but in the mass and dimensions of this device, and what kind of grenade launcher did the same thing (an ordinary grenade launcher, or something like a "drill"?). Well, the drone - the artillery spotter - this is without a doubt a useful thing.
    3. tol100v
      tol100v 13 January 2016 18: 42 New
      +7
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      Quadcopter is how many screws? quadra -4, hecto-6. Tricks ..don't give out military secrets

      Multi? OUR warrant officer will answer: to x ..! And he won’t give out military secrets! And the fact that our industry is doing everything possible to equip our army is a low bow and gratitude!
    4. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 13 January 2016 19: 58 New
      +2
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      Quadcopter is how many screws? quadra -4, hecto-6. Tricks ..don't give out military secrets laughing

      This is probably not a secret, since there are already photos in the media.
      1. Asadullah
        Asadullah 13 January 2016 21: 11 New
        0
        This is probably not a secret, since there are already photos in the media.


        This secret is already twenty years old. And ten years, this is being traded all over the Internet. The secret is that it doesn’t force this thing to be planted on the balcony by an advanced eighth grader, which discovers the target and the golden ratio - the mass of batteries with a payload. And then, such a secret is not very secret, let's call it the cunning of a locksmith.
  5. Monos
    Monos 13 January 2016 18: 14 New
    +4
    Such a platform does not seem to me suitable for a grenade launcher. Although ... If you put gyroscopes ...
    1. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 13 January 2016 18: 18 New
      +1
      Quote: Monos
      Such a platform does not seem to me suitable for a grenade launcher. Although ... If you put gyroscopes ...


      - It also seems to me that a full-fledged rocket-propelled grenade launcher after the first shot will throw the drone far back, and well, if it doesn’t stick it into the ground, due to loss of control. However, it all depends on the mass of the drone. These guys could take some old MI-8 by the chassis and pervert over it.

      UPD: looked at the link of comrade Alexei, http://rusvesna.su/news/1451020270, there is a photo of the drone. No MI-8 and other derivatives of the gloomy Soviet genius.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 13 January 2016 19: 25 New
        +2
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        It also seems to me that a full-fledged rocket-propelled grenade launcher, after the first shot, will throw the drone far back, and well, if it does not stick it into the ground, due to loss of control. However, it all depends on the mass of the drone. These guys could take some old MI-8 by the chassis and pervert over it.

        This is when using a standard grenade launcher, but what if the grenade launcher and sighting system are separated? In this case, the rocket does not have to be fastened dead to the quadrocopter, it may well start after separation from the supporting structure (reset and delay of 1 sec).
        The whole problem of such UAVs and robotic systems is that you have to adapt weapons planned and made for human use.
        1. Asadullah
          Asadullah 13 January 2016 21: 22 New
          +1
          In this case, the rocket does not have to be fastened dead to the quadrocopter, it may well start after separation from the supporting structure (reset and delay of 1 sec).


          I add that b \ h can be completely different. From a commonplace lighter to ....., but the fact is that the carrying capacity of this device is extremely small, the mass for one kg already requires internal combustion engines. From that word, “grenade launcher”, deciphered in a milder form, could be called a grenade launcher. Which just lets go of the maximum payload on top. As a serious combat unit, one can consider hundreds of such objects, connected to the management of one operator, with very advanced communication software.
        2. alexng
          alexng 13 January 2016 23: 51 New
          +1
          Most likely, everything will be on the principle of "shaitan trumpet." Although I am not an expert in these matters, but if I started this device and conduct a test of the system to counteract external interference and destruction from small arms, then the issue of recoil and stabilization after the shot has already been resolved. I think, most likely, the container is first detached from the X-copter and then the container itself shoots with a grenade. Yes, and the grenade itself or the container, I think, is also stuffed with a homing system with duplication of escort from the copter. I would have solved this issue.
    2. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 13 January 2016 18: 21 New
      +6
      Gyroscopes now in children's low-budget helicopters even stand on radio control ...
    3. Sorokin
      Sorokin 13 January 2016 18: 25 New
      +1
      And they will be delivered, not a bomber jacket. Most likely designed for GP
      1. Mister22408
        Mister22408 13 January 2016 21: 52 New
        0
        Tape feed GP? Do you know the damage radius of VOG?
    4. Mister22408
      Mister22408 13 January 2016 21: 50 New
      +1
      And if you stick an 18th-century mortar, there will be no price. There is stabilization on gyroscopes (OG). Would put a couple of small-caliber URS with VVPM instead of a piece of iron.
  6. marshes
    marshes 13 January 2016 18: 14 New
    +4
    If only they would draw a diagram. And what will be armed with GPs?
    Better multicopter with a mine, cumulative, made against the tanks. I sat on the tower and that’s it.
    1. Sorokin
      Sorokin 13 January 2016 21: 19 New
      0
      Problematic. From a height of 1-2 meters to plant in the bushes for a more fun purpose. And flew away. The money however is intact.
      1. marshes
        marshes 13 January 2016 21: 42 New
        0
        Quote: Sorokin
        Problematic.

        We'll see how it goes laughing The Germans had a cumulative mine in WW2, Hafthohlladung 3 (HHL 3, Haft - H3)
  7. Haettenschweiler
    Haettenschweiler 13 January 2016 18: 15 New
    +1
    - Very little information. Russian UAVs are Israeli (or American) toys. Domestic ones were also being developed, there was even a rumor that an extra-heavy UAV based on the T-50 would be created. How it ended - I do not know, complete silence on the air regarding his fate. All publications switched to the T-14. Here in connection with this is curiosity: who produced these UAVs? Kaike samples were taken for production? Who supplied the electronic stuffing of the toy? In fact, this short note gives an order of magnitude more questions than answers.
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 13 January 2016 18: 18 New
      +4
      http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201512221303-u16j.htm
      Specialists of the United Instrument-Making Corporation have created multicopter models armed with grenade launchers and flamethrowers.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 13 January 2016 19: 08 New
        +2
        Quote: WUA 518
        http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201512221303-u16j.htm
        Specialists of the United Instrument-Making Corporation have created multicopter models armed with grenade launchers and flamethrowers.

        Sasha, welcome, friend drinks
        Is such a bee visible on radars? Or does such a fly fly low, buzz quietly? wink
        By the way, Sashok, I was looking for info on our drummer up to 20 tons ... something, our “Uncle Vasya” is working quietly, and nowhere gu-gu. But after all, the USSR was the first to use UAVs. “Flight” (TU- 143) and the “Kite” (TU-300) are still in service, if sclerosis does not change me.
        Regards, friend. drinks
    2. flSergius
      flSergius 13 January 2016 18: 49 New
      +3
      I will not argue about the share of domestic in domestic UAVs, but as for the unmanned T-50 I will say: first you need to bring the manned to mind so that there is at least a small series in the army, and not 2 prototypes in the design bureau. Then we can talk about all sorts of gadgets. But this does not prevent active development on paper and testing of individual systems.
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. Dmitry Toderes
        Dmitry Toderes 13 January 2016 20: 10 New
        +3
        The T-50 has already 17 flight prototypes and 5 prototypes for ground tests.
  8. Same lech
    Same lech 13 January 2016 18: 17 New
    0
    “Already created samples of the scout copter, observer spotter fire, shock and cargo copters. They can autonomously monitor objects and perform special maneuvers when fired, which makes them virtually invulnerable to small arms.
    Conventional serial hand grenade launchers and flamethrowers are used as payloads on copters, ”the agency’s interlocutor said.


    http://rusvesna.su/news/1451020270

    Video to the studio ...

    Aircraft with full combat load ... it's not a tsetse fly.
    Nobody has yet repealed the laws of physics, and I can’t believe in the invulnerability of quadrocopters until I see the evidence.
    1. WUA 518
      WUA 518 13 January 2016 18: 23 New
      +4
      Quote: The same Lech
      Video to the studio ...

    2. Extraneous
      Extraneous 13 January 2016 22: 01 New
      0
      With six months ago, I saw the video seems to be a "military acceptance" on YouTube. Multicopter, designed for specials. Attached a gun, it seems glock, not sure. memory problems senile. Positioning and guidance are stabilized by a gyroscope. shooting solitary. the return is compensated by computer-controlled engines. remote control. in case of loss of communication - automatic return of the device to the base.
      Shown shelling from a Makar. For single shots, the reaction is instant - going to the side while maintaining the aiming point. The line from the machine is a broken path with a change in altitude, in short - "St. Witt's dance". Getting in is very difficult. But there is a height limit, below which the device no longer has time to react, in my opinion - 30 meters.
  9. flSergius
    flSergius 13 January 2016 18: 26 New
    0
    Look, this is the same news in Russian spring, where drones are equipped with grenade launchers and flamethrowers. http://rusvesna.su/news/1452697253
    And how is a flamethrower on an aircraft? Obviously not jet. Reactive (bumblebee, varna) or even a black spot?
  10. 31rus
    31rus 13 January 2016 18: 27 New
    +1
    Dear, it is completely possible that under the concept of a grenade launcher, a flamethrower, not what you imagine, it is possible that the aircraft is only a conditionally copter, there is no need to rush to conclusions
  11. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 13 January 2016 18: 29 New
    +2
    It’s fun to let such a thing into the boys ... smile I would love to be pampered ... and they also say it’s bad to serve in the army laughing
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 13 January 2016 18: 35 New
      +2
      http://geektimes.ru/post/257244/


      Here you are for the development of creative abilities. smile

      And what only people do not come up with ... truly there is no limit to the imagination of man.
    2. dauria
      dauria 14 January 2016 01: 06 New
      +2
      It’s fun to let such a thing into the boys


      laughing But the adult "boys" and indulge in nonsense ...
      Seriously weapons on an electric fly swatter should not be considered. Up to 1 kW, an electric motor with a lithium battery still competes with the internal combustion engine according to the power-mass-duration criterion. Well, let them be 4 or 8 is a maximum of 10 kg of take-off (and not useful) weight. And if the scout, on the contrary, is smaller, quieter and more inconspicuous, so it will be a wind toy. A simpler disposable projectile with a parachute.
  12. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 13 January 2016 18: 29 New
    +2
    Nice one. So you sit, don’t touch anyone, and then a grenade flies on your head from above ... :)
    1. Hey
      Hey 13 January 2016 18: 51 New
      +3
      The militias in Dombas did just that. They put a grenade into a glass cup, pulled out a check and adapted the glass to the drone and sent it on the road. The glass held the trigger. After the reset, the glass broke, the lever was released ... an explosion. The accuracy and efficiency of course were not very, but it worked specifically on the nerves.
    2. flSergius
      flSergius 13 January 2016 18: 52 New
      0
      That's to prevent this, you need to pay attention to your wife, just touch. And do not sit in the evenings in wink
  13. Faust
    Faust 13 January 2016 18: 32 New
    0
    What grenades?

    Most likely, the power of bestowal is important here. Interestingly, the grenade from the grenade launcher is strongly given?
    1. flSergius
      flSergius 13 January 2016 19: 12 New
      -1
      I saw a video with an American armed quadrocopter. There they made a maaalenky 4-barrel recoilless rifle caliber. There is no return.
      I can’t find the proof - it was a long time ago.
      1. Aleksey_K
        Aleksey_K 13 January 2016 20: 06 New
        +2
        Quote: flSergius
        There they made a small 4 four-barrel recoilless rifle caliber. There is no return.

        Rollback is always there. The word "recoilless" merely means that the barrel of the "gun" is not rolled away separately from the "gun". Rollback makes the entire "gun" along with the barrel of the "gun".
  14. Undermined ustoev
    Undermined ustoev 13 January 2016 18: 43 New
    +4
    I want, really want to make them! No, at least to experience. But alas, my train left at the stage of choosing its engineering specialization. So sorrow. However, it does not hurt these people to sincerely shake hands in case of personal acquaintance.
    1. marshes
      marshes 13 January 2016 18: 49 New
      +2
      Quote: Undermining the Foundations
      I want, really want to make them! No, at least to experience

      What's the problem?
      The Chinese can provide everyone. smile You can buy on ALI through the Internet.
      Long-term connections, by the Chinese, acclaimed. The most decent from Hong Kong and Shanghai and the rest are scoundrels.
  15. Mihalich17
    Mihalich17 13 January 2016 18: 47 New
    +4
    Reading such articles, I understand that I’m ready for years to hunch back in the garden and eat only what I can grow, but the army should be dressed, fed, trained, equipped and sent to inspire everyone who shows at least the slightest signs of maloperation.
  16. vobels
    vobels 13 January 2016 18: 52 New
    +1
    Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
    Nice one. So you sit, don’t touch anyone, and then a grenade flies on your head from above ... :)

    Well, if you don’t touch, then maybe it won’t fly. And if, then, yes.
  17. Undermined ustoev
    Undermined ustoev 13 January 2016 18: 54 New
    +1
    Quote: marshes
    Quote: Undermining the Foundations
    I want, really want to make them! No, at least to experience

    What's the problem?

    In the Chinese. I want to work in the defense industry, to do this professionally, and not in my backyard. But, unfortunately, my once deep knowledge of electrical engineering and electronics is forgotten as unnecessary. In the current field of activity is quite superficial. For a hobby, in addition to stuffing the minuses here, I have a graphic tablet and a classic six-string Leningrad still produced.
    1. marshes
      marshes 13 January 2016 19: 09 New
      +3
      Quote: Undermining the Foundations
      In the Chinese. I want to work in the defense industry, to do this professionally, and not in my backyard.

      The most interesting thing is that in the backyard you can make money, tenge smile
      Producing not fancy stuff. smile And then move on to the “miracle of the world auto industry”, but you won’t earn an apartment, not those times, and the prices. But I eat caviar, I prefer red-black, rye, bread-butter-butter-vodka-Talka, it’s strange but the Russian Federation, although there’s our short circuit, not bad but it's sweat BESH.
      And so a video clip, random. China is something ...
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 14 January 2016 19: 03 New
        0
        Quote: marshes
        The most interesting thing is that in the backyard you can make money, tenge

        I will support your thought, but the example you have chosen is not entirely successful.
        If you find someone who will buy these horses 100 pieces a month, then it makes sense to invest money initially, and we will talk about real money 10-20 pieces of American rubles.
  18. evgeny1979
    evgeny1979 13 January 2016 18: 55 New
    0
    Such innovations are very encouraging, the main thing is that the costs are justified, and if it’s not expensive too, it’s excellent !!!
  19. a.hamster55
    a.hamster55 13 January 2016 18: 58 New
    0
    So nowhere is it written that a rocket launcher! Maybe he just folds the hand! Like F-1 without a ring in a faceted glass lol
  20. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 13 January 2016 19: 02 New
    0
    Soon, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation will make films about real battles involving drones, guided vehicles, ...
  21. lexx2038
    lexx2038 13 January 2016 19: 02 New
    0
    Why argue, our domestic engineers, competent people, and automatic machines we always did well, here it all depends on those who set the task task. They say that they buzzed and fired - ours will do, maybe they will not be painted so beautifully as those of fools, but I am sure it will be better and cheaper to shoot. As now in Syria - a new specialized computing subsystem (SVP-24) allows old unguided munitions from a height of 6000 meters to fall into the very “hole” - cheaply and angrily. But p! Ndosov is expensive, and all get to hospitals or weddings.
  22. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 13 January 2016 19: 03 New
    +2
    great news! I recently proposed such an option for using quadrocopters.
    For those who are in doubt, I can inform you that there are modern “small” devices on sale that can carry loads of up to 40 kg, have stabilization that allows you to shoot high-quality professional films. There may be several hours in the air. Precise guidance and launch can be carried out remotely, including at night through infrared equipment on a quadrocorteur.
    Great weapon for the fighters of New Russia!
  23. Undermined ustoev
    Undermined ustoev 13 January 2016 19: 27 New
    +2
    Quote: marshes
    Quote: Undermining the Foundations
    In the Chinese. I want to work in the defense industry, to do this professionally, and not in my backyard.

    The most interesting thing is that in the backyard you can make money, tenge smile
    Producing not fancy stuff. smile

    I get paid at work. If you also start earning on a hobby, then what kind of hobby is it? I prefer the proletarian approach to making money on the principle: my brains and hands on your means of production and grandmother. If I draw for someone - only if there is an irresistible desire and only for hard currency "thank you very much". It goes without saying that there are very few people for whom I am doing something for free and I have known them personally for quite some time. So it goes.
    1. marshes
      marshes 13 January 2016 19: 44 New
      0
      Quote: Undermining the Foundations
      I get paid at work

      Well, thank God. smile
      Quote: Undermining the Foundations
      If you also start earning on a hobby, then what kind of hobby is it?

      What I brought, it began with a hobby, a lot of money was spent but everything returned, now I have metalwork, though it’s not steel but duralumin, D3. Five machines are torn.
      I’m not so “smart”, not those educations. smile There is a brain, that decides. laughing And that RVSNschik. laughing I can agree or fill a turnip laughing
      Quote: Undermining the Foundations
      I prefer the proletarian approach to making money on the principle: my brains and hands on your means of production and grandmother.

      We tried to crank it up in 90, no one writes it. As long as we didn’t do our own on cabinet furniture, it’s looking and soft. The work throughout the KZ diverged, even were “court furniture makers” laughing It all starts with a small one. They started that in the house, a private house is a suburb, they collected furniture.
      Now a metal shop, there is something true ...
  24. Dyagilev
    Dyagilev 13 January 2016 21: 10 New
    0
    It used to be good: he went out into the street, greeted the people and led the country back. And now? Guys in suits won't help. Papamobile won't save either.
    1. marshes
      marshes 13 January 2016 21: 19 New
      0
      Quote: Dyagilev
      It used to be good: he went out into the street, greeted the people and led the country back.

      As in the movie-Chicken Ryaba-hello people. laughing
      Quote: Dyagilev
      . And now? Guys in suits won't help. Papamobile won't save either.

      Meren Pullman, protects against weapons of mass destruction, not only against grenade launcher shots, Shevornadze will not let you lie. laughing
  25. Cobra77
    Cobra77 13 January 2016 22: 00 New
    0
    I have been hearing about these rotorcraft for about 5 years, as I probably have. However, I would like to see real prototypes with weapons on board. And not mass-scale models from exhibitions. I would also like to hear about the alleged tactics of combat use. Range of action, degree of autonomy, security. I also want to understand why copters have an advantage over the drone's airplane scheme, except for mobility and the possibility of hovering precisely in the context of combat use?
  26. midashko
    midashko 13 January 2016 22: 13 New
    0
    “Military valor ends,” Alexander the Great once said, inspecting the ballista.

    Indeed, soon (well, maybe not so soon) the soldier and, especially the officer, will fight in the bunker, at the computer, will knock on the keyboard, in the mouth a cigarette, next to coffee. And on the battlefield, various robots with artificial intelligence will run, jump, fly, crawl underground, swim on and under water. They will exterminate their own kind and the civilian population, as well as protect people in the bunker. Warriors will forget how to shoot, just as they forgot fencing, physical training will come down to formality, they will be fat and belly, the whole service will be held in computer shooters. Decisions for warriors will be made either by politicians or by a computer, as a device capable of processing large volumes of data in the shortest possible time and more accurately making a decision.
    Macedonian was right.
  27. Papapg
    Papapg 13 January 2016 22: 53 New
    0
    Very good news, long-awaited. And to fly at night, then they won’t bring down.
  28. Mestny
    Mestny 13 January 2016 23: 23 New
    -1
    Quote: UREC
    Yes, God did not create man, but the devil. How many brains are working around the world and the money is spent to create tools for killing their own kind.

    Do not worry. If there is no use in a real war, then they will certainly be used in a civilian. There is no need to shoot grenades there, but cargo delivery and high reliability in extreme situations will come in handy.
  29. Michael easily
    Michael easily 14 January 2016 00: 47 New
    0
    Expanding the UAV scanning area is a normal evolutionary STEP ...
  30. vv3
    vv3 14 January 2016 03: 20 New
    +1
    There are simply no words !!! Why hang weapons on a small UAV, if it can be coordinated with the same "KOALITSEYA", with "SMERCHEM", other long-range weapons of destruction. Is it so hard to understand? Here’s a simple task. When will it be solved? That’s what is needed for Syria and in general ...
    1. Letnab
      Letnab 14 January 2016 08: 07 New
      0
      Here, rather, the coordination of a large UAV with a long autonomous stay in the air will be, i.e. it turns out the UAV control center transmits air surveillance data to artillery units through the command and control center. It turns out discussed here on the Andromeda website.
      And for small units, as an additional option, small UAVs such as quadrics and multicopter, to control their sector during the battle, and according to their data, the adoption of any decision, including calling for help from artillery or aircraft.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  31. Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 14 January 2016 10: 40 New
    0
    The “grenade launcher” may be a system from a glass beaker with a grenade inserted inside, from which the fuse was pulled out of the detonator (or it is pulled out when dropped).
    At the command, the glass is dropped, when it hits the ground it breaks, then it is known that.
    What is not a "grenade launcher"? Moreover, they can be dropped right on your head.
    And at the same time - no return! .. :)