Military Review

Painting and insulation works are completed at Admiral Kasatonov

36
On the frigate Admiral fleet Kasatonov ”(project 22350), being built at the Severnaya Verf shipyard, the main painting and insulation works have been completed, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the enterprise.




“Electromechanical equipment was mounted on the frigate, power was received from the shore, production of general ship systems is being completed. Shipbuilders prepare all the tanks of the ship under the reception of water, fuel, oil. Electrical work is now being done on the frigate, ”the release says.

The Admiral of the Kasaton fleet was launched in December 2014. The lead ship of the series Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Gorshkov is now in state trials.

Manufacturer Help: “The 22350 frigates of the project are designed to conduct combat operations in the ocean and sea areas against surface ships and submarines of the enemy, to repel attacks of air attack weapons, both independently and as part of a compound of ships.

The frigates are armed with A-192 millimeter caliber X-NUMX artillery mounts, Onyx or Caliber-NKE anti-ship 130 launchers, and Polyment-Redut anti-ship missile system.

Main characteristics: displacement - 4500 tons; length - 135 m .; width - 16 m; speed - up to 29 nodes; cruising range - 4500 miles; autonomy - 30 days; crew - 180-210 people. "
Photos used:
Curious / forums.airbase.ru
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. g1v2
    g1v2 13 January 2016 17: 47 New
    +9
    Well, the turbine alone is still under repair, what's the point of painting? And it looks like it will be repaired for a long time, which means that Kasatonov will be handed over only next year. request
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 13 January 2016 17: 51 New
      +6
      Quote: g1v2
      And it looks like it will be repaired for a long time, which means that Kasatonov will be handed over only next year.

      Well, if you consider that it was laid back in 2009, the extra year does not play a special role. Stop, or do you mean 2017? Oh, nafik, I think in 2016 they will surrender.
      1. g1v2
        g1v2 13 January 2016 18: 02 New
        +2
        It is 2017 and I mean. Well, if this year it goes to the test, but I think they will accept it in 2017. request
      2. Wiruz
        Wiruz 13 January 2016 18: 13 New
        0
        Well, if you consider that it was laid back in 2009, the extra year does not play a special role. Stop, or do you mean 2017? Oh, nafik, I think in 2016 they will surrender.

        This is all right. I’m more worried whether the frigates pr.22350 (M) will still be built? As for me - it’s not worth it. We recently sat with our comrades in the kitchen, thought, had a bite, and decided that instead of frigate-less destroyers it is better to build full-fledged gas-turbine destroyers. And forget about all the plans for the 15-kiloton leaders with YaSU.

        What do you think? Isn't it better to reduce the Corvette-Frigate-Destroyer chain to Corvette-Destroyer? At the same time, destroyers build on all the fleets (well, maybe except for the DCBF) hi
        1. Vladimyrych
          Vladimyrych 13 January 2016 18: 49 New
          12
          Perhaps it’s necessary to cut the chain just now? We can proudly announce the replacement of 11356P with 22600 and here on all forums cheers articles that it's cool! The complete idiocy of course.
          Well, suppose there is a shock and a counter shock? Fort again? Or Calm what on 11356P? Or generally beam like in the Indians? belay
          The S-400 is not oversized, the S-500 is still no mention of the land and will there be sea-based? What can I say if the spent 11356Rs are so late that you are amazed at the lack of responsibility among the responsible persons. And the main thing is to spoil everyone. No one plants and doesn’t react at all.
          And already about the gas turbine and generally disgusting to think ...
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 13 January 2016 19: 07 New
            +4
            We can proudly announce the replacement of 11356P with 22600 and here on all forums cheers articles that it's cool! The complete idiocy of course.

            No one has ever said anything smart about replacing 11356 with RTOs (except for the commander-in-chief, God bless him with a new job).
            S-400 is not messed up

            Firstly: I do not think that work on his soaking has not been / is being conducted, we just don’t know about it. Secondly: what if we have the S-400F.
            S-500 is also no mention of the land

            When I go out into the field - I don’t see a gopher either
            The S-500 also has no mention of the land, and will there be sea-based?

            It will be.
            the spent 11356Rs are so late that you are amazed at the lack of responsibility of those responsible

            Here I agree. Unfortunately, the constant delay in the delivery of ships is a new tradition.
            And already about the gas turbine and generally disgusting to think ...

            But do not you feel disgusted to think about how much cheaper a ship with a non-nuclear power plant will be? Or how much safer it will be and how much easier to operate?
            1. Vladimyrych
              Vladimyrych 13 January 2016 19: 16 New
              +1
              One of the naval commanders, by tradition, echoed in Moscow and blurted out 22600. A worthy replacement for the 11356R. I will not search for links.

              On S-400, I really doubt the marine version, for they do not bother to forge the polymer. And IMHO do not bother to return to Fort or develop a new Calm.

              S-500 IMHO horror story. I do not believe.

              YaSU with our training on the cruiser arsenal (and the leader implies it) the very thing. True ambition to be able to and not 12 in the series but at least 6 degenerate.
            2. Tusv
              Tusv 13 January 2016 20: 42 New
              0
              Quote: Wiruz
              Firstly: I do not think that work on his soaking has not been / is being conducted, we just don’t know about it. Secondly: what if we have the S-400F.

              The S-500 has space targets, why such a system on board a ship? Expensive and cumbersome.
              Tolley deal S-350 namoryat, which is on the state. tests. Compact and killer
              1. Vladimyrych
                Vladimyrych 13 January 2016 20: 51 New
                +2
                S-350 is not much different from the Buk M3. In addition, in constant refinement Poliment-Redoubt. They say "Furke" does not work correctly. Also about 350ka. I don’t really understand why so many clones.
                On the Leader they predict exactly the S-500. Outrun America with their standards.
                1. Tusv
                  Tusv 13 January 2016 22: 04 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Vladimir
                  S-350 little different from Buk M3

                  Clarification. The means of delivery of damaging elements are not much different. Everything else, like family underpants, differs from thongs, but in general, all the same, underpants :)
                  1. Vladimyrych
                    Vladimyrych 13 January 2016 22: 26 New
                    0
                    And it is known what is the difference ..? I would read with pleasure ... yes
                    1. Tusv
                      Tusv 13 January 2016 23: 24 New
                      +2
                      Quote: Vladimir
                      And it is known what is the difference ..? I would read with pleasure

                      The guidance and control system is neutered, the system of determining "friend or foe at the level of the non-Ardental man. Actually everything.
                      Toru, Shell and Buk is not required. Flew in - catapult if you can.
                      The divisional complex can self-destruct the damaging element, in the case of ChiWo, and practically evade the landing gear, “lilac little hopeless”
        2. chunga-changa
          chunga-changa 13 January 2016 18: 59 New
          +6
          The destroyer industry is not pulling, because there is not only a box, there are so many problems with turbines alone. Even the frigate is not clear when it will be. Well, they are going to do atomic ones not from a good life, but because the nuclear power industry is ready to give them.
          1. Vladimyrych
            Vladimyrych 13 January 2016 19: 03 New
            +3
            And this is not the last reason. It is openly said about autonomy because we will not pull 100500 from a gas turbine.
            The situation will develop as follows: 2-3 (as it turns out) 1144 and 3-4 Leaders. By the time of the descent of Leaders 1144 will be in a colander IMHO ...
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. gispanec
          gispanec 14 January 2016 09: 13 New
          0
          Quote: Wiruz
          Isn't it better to reduce the Corvette-Frigate-Destroyer chain to Corvette-Destroyer?

          not better, each has its own task ..... it’s all the same, it’s better to build only c400 and remove the rest from the chain ..... you can build a wunderwafel - floating crEpost with GDP .... docks ... Blasters ... with railguns and the rest of the husk ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 13 January 2016 18: 52 New
      0
      Quote: g1v2
      Well, the turbine alone is still under repair, what's the point of painting? And it looks like it will be repaired for a long time, which means that Kasatonov will be handed over only next year. request



      I heard somewhere that they can buy Chinese turbines.
      1. Primus pilus
        Primus pilus 13 January 2016 19: 30 New
        0
        Yes, even if the Chinese fish without fish and bezryba.
  2. bad
    bad 13 January 2016 17: 47 New
    +3
    we are waiting very much when the handsome frigate will carry out military service to protect the interests of RUSSIA! .. there would be more of such frigates .. you look and the adversaries will not be impudent smile
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 13 January 2016 18: 11 New
      +3
      Something I did not understand, why are you being minus?
      1. Signore Tomato
        Signore Tomato 13 January 2016 19: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Dr. Bormental
        Something I did not understand, why are you being minus?


        "Ahhh !!! Everything's gone, boss! Everything's gone !!! Gypsum is removed !! The client is leaving !!!"
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio 13 January 2016 17: 49 New
    +1
    Yes beautiful frigate
  4. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 13 January 2016 17: 50 New
    +1
    More need such beauties!
  5. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 13 January 2016 17: 54 New
    +1
    They would have said honestly this year, or they would bring them to the fleet.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 13 January 2016 19: 52 New
      +6
      Turbine Return Contract September.

      Then another 3 of a month for constructive procedures, connection, checks, settings. For testing, most likely they will be pushed under the tree, and putting in 2017 without options, even if the contract is completed on time, which is far from a fact.
  6. Yellow white
    Yellow white 13 January 2016 17: 55 New
    +2
    All one, seven feet under the keel! hi
  7. tinibar
    tinibar 13 January 2016 18: 14 New
    +4
    Why guess when Kasatonov will be introduced, when Gorshkov has not yet completed the test ... hi
  8. lecturer
    lecturer 13 January 2016 18: 50 New
    +5
    The frigate “Admiral of the Fleet of Kasatonov” (project 22350), which is being built at the Severnaya Verf shipyard, completed the main painting and insulation works, the military-industrial complex reports ...
    , and as the boatswain told us: “the more layers of the meerk — the more reliable the armor!”, ..., “and keep watch on guard always! Schaub not splash!”, ... And in general “if you want to sail at random - it’s better to go to the sea drop it, "..." The sea wolf knows a lot about everything. "... or so, in modern terms:" you don’t know GPS Glonass, then rely on us! ".
    BUT, the most important sayings of our boatswain:
    • A soldier beats the enemy in the field, and a sailor - in the sea.
    • The enemy knows how a Russian sailor is fighting!
    1. Kathernik
      Kathernik 13 January 2016 19: 57 New
      +9
      - I know other sayings of a mechanic: iron in the Urals Doha ...! (at critical diesel loads).
      1. lecturer
        lecturer 13 January 2016 20: 54 New
        10
        I just picked up for your hardware:
        Two young lieutenants, a mechanic and a navigator, decided to exchange posts on one watch. The navigator stands in the engine room, crows from the roar of diesel engines. A sailor runs up to him: - Comrade Lieutenant! The main thrust bearing is warming up on the right diesel engine! - “Increase the speed!” “Comrade lieutenant, we’ll melt the bearing - we’ll all go to court ...- Well, to hell with you, we’ll go to the bridge, we’ll consult with the mechanic. There is a characteristic atmosphere, night, faint lights of instrument illumination. A mechanic was leaning over the map, concentrating on the back of his head. - Comrade Lieutenant, there is a problem in the car - the main thrust bearing of the right diesel engine is heating up. - And no wonder: the second hour we’ll go by land ...
  9. tol100v
    tol100v 13 January 2016 19: 22 New
    +3
    The timing of commissioning is important, but taking a crude ship into operation is worse than sabotage!
  10. bochman
    bochman 13 January 2016 20: 49 New
    +6
    Quote: Tol100v
    The timing of commissioning is important, but taking a crude ship into operation is worse than sabotage!

    Good evening.
    You are right, of course. But for information: even in Soviet times favorable for shipbuilding, ships left the factories on New Year's Eve (the plant received large bonuses) and after the first exit another half or a year became, for the so-called, revision. And then by all means brought everything to a more or less combat-ready state (I have personal experience).
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 13 January 2016 22: 36 New
      0
      To someone, a car could come in turn. Here the refinement was carried out by the auto-owner.
  11. Sultan Babai
    Sultan Babai 13 January 2016 22: 41 New
    +1
    Thank you for the information, because the information on this ship is very scarce. The news about the fleet is always interesting, since each new ship is like a grand event, comparable in size to some small or big victory ... There is very interesting information about the future of our fleet but I’ll describe it later in my article, I found out information on the website of the Federal Institute of Industrial Property ... very interesting information, my hands are itching right now to dump everything, but so far the material is raw ...
    1. lecturer
      lecturer 13 January 2016 23: 21 New
      0
      For you, I will specially tell you about the "living organism of the ship from the quote":
      “The ship is a living organism,” said the commander of the military-industrial complex, Captain First Rank Anton Speransky. - Of course, this is a complex engineering structure. Construction takes a long time, sometimes several years. Progress, meanwhile, does not stand still, so with the apparent similarity, each ship is individual. It has its own character, soul, if you want. The core, of course, is people.

      Подробнее: http://www.b-port.com/smi/6/3718/69278.html#ixzz3x9pjCeGe
  12. sergant67
    sergant67 13 January 2016 23: 08 New
    0
    Painting (moral) restoration work must be carried out with our government.
  13. sergant67
    sergant67 13 January 2016 23: 29 New
    0
    Painting (moral) restoration work must be carried out with our government.
  14. Garris199
    Garris199 14 January 2016 01: 31 New
    0
    It is funny that frigates 11356, which they began to build due to the fact that they are type mastered by industry, are finally being commissioned at the same pace as 22350. What is the point in them then?
  15. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 14 January 2016 10: 35 New
    0
    These are all rogues "effective managers" interfere with the Russian Navy! When will they take up the "liberalists" in the defense industry?
  16. abc_alex
    abc_alex 14 January 2016 10: 59 New
    0
    Quote: Vladimir
    The S-400 is not oversized, the S-500 has no mention of the land, and will it be sea-based?


    Yes? And what is the S-400, if not the "digitized" S-300? Fundamentally different from the S-300, it differs in the use of AFAR and a new control center on a modern elemental base.
    Redoubt differs from Fort exactly the same.
    By the way, the 9M96 rocket of Poliment Redut and S-400 is common.