Military Review

"Ilyushin" began to create the IL-76TD-90A - the civilian version of the military transport aircraft

58
"Ilyushin" began to create a modernized version of the transport aircraft Il-76TD-90A for civil and commercial aviation, Said MIC with reference to Interfax-AVN.




“Work is beginning on the creation of a deeply modernized IL-76TD-90А transport aircraft,” a source said. “The lead developer of the aircraft is the Ilyushin Aviation Complex and there are already preliminary applications for the purchase of such aircraft.”

“The onboard radio-electronic equipment will be installed upgraded, similar to the avionics on the IL-76MD-90А. The engines are the same - PS-90-76 on take-off to 14,5 t. The capacity of IL-76TD-90А will be increased from 47 t to 52 t, as on the military version of IL-76МД-90А, ”said the source.

He recalled that “in November 2015 of the year, Emergencies Minister Vladimir Puchkov signed an agreement with Il to supply six new aircraft from 2016 to 2022.” The Transaviaexport company (Belarus) was interested in the civilian version of the aircraft, as well as a number of companies from Middle Eastern countries.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has already received the second military transport Il-76MD-90А.

“We have received the first two cars and are starting tomorrow with a planned development in our Training Center for flight crews,” said Vladimir Benediktov, commander of the BTA VKS.

Earlier it was reported that the military ordered 39 such aircraft.
Photos used:
Photo: Victoria Chernysheva / RG
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 13 January 2016 15: 45 New
    +3
    Volga-Dnepr can take it.
    1. AUL
      AUL 13 January 2016 15: 54 New
      0
      And why not create a passenger version on the basis of this aircraft? A machine that is not particularly demanding on runway quality would be in demand on lines in Siberia.
      1. Primus pilus
        Primus pilus 13 January 2016 15: 59 New
        +1
        This is unlikely to be economically viable.
      2. Horst78
        Horst78 13 January 2016 16: 37 New
        +2
        Quote: AUL
        And why not create a passenger version on the basis of this aircraft? A machine that is not particularly demanding on runway quality would be in demand on lines in Siberia.

        And what does Siberia have to do with it? What do you think We have unpaved airports here? no Where the IL-76 run-up / mileage coverage is nothing to do.
        1. gjv
          gjv 13 January 2016 20: 23 New
          +5
          Quote: Horst78
          Where the IL-76 run-up / mileage coverage is nothing to do.

          1. NordUral
            NordUral 13 January 2016 21: 03 New
            -4
            Yes, our flyers, real men! And the technique that you need! Only in power alone ... and so for more than half a century ... It is time for the power of a real man, and not just one, it's time!
            1. NordUral
              NordUral 14 January 2016 09: 24 New
              0
              What, minus signers, have nothing to say? Put the minuses, let's silently help the liberals plunder the country and drag them into the abyss.
          2. egor1712
            egor1712 13 January 2016 21: 16 New
            +1
            Just a class video. real aerobatics. I flew from the primers, but on Ile. Super!
      3. gergi
        gergi 13 January 2016 21: 23 New
        0
        In the village of dairyman grandmothers to deliver? Milk will become brilliant.
      4. samoletil18
        samoletil18 13 January 2016 22: 40 New
        0
        If only kerosene will be attached for free.
    2. FID
      FID 13 January 2016 15: 54 New
      +7
      What for? They are equipped, but there are no orders for cargo transportation ... Passenger wide-body bodies can cope with the transportation of goods, and large-sized ones are not often ...
      1. gjv
        gjv 13 January 2016 16: 15 New
        +7
        Quote: Primus Pilus
        Volga-Dnepr can take it.

        Quote: SSI
        What for? They are equipped, but there are no orders for cargo transportation ...

        There are orders, Volga-Dnepr flies quite intensively (look at least flyradar, it can be seen there). Another thing is that they have already built for themselves 5 pieces of IL-76TD-90VD. What will be especially different IL-76TD-90A? request Given that for a military modification of the IL-76MD-90A, the maximum carrying capacity is usually indicated 60 tons. A much larger volume of Volga-Dnepr traffic is carried out by An-124-100 Ruslan aircraft. There were 10 of them in the company, and at the end of 2015 another 2 were purchased from Flight. They will repair it and plan to start operation this year. So the IL-76TD-90A for Volga-Dnepr is unlikely ...
        1. FID
          FID 13 January 2016 16: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: gjv
          There are orders

          In addition to Belarusians (a few pieces) who else orders? Crisis in cargo transportation ... Of the large a / c only AirBridgeCargo (daughter of Yeroflot), but the Volga-Dnepr remained ...
    3. Sweles
      Sweles 13 January 2016 15: 55 New
      0
      "Ilyushin" began to create the IL-76TD-90A - the civilian version of the military transport aircraft

      What does "started" mean? if already in the year 12 they released the first such aircraft?
      Serial production began in 2012, three copies were built. If the initial need was estimated by the number of 38 aircraft, then at the time of the launch of the series it increased to fifty, and then reached one hundred pieces of various modifications (until 2020). The defense department also showed interest in a special long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft based on the same IL-76MD-90A. - Read more on FB.ru: http://fb.ru/article/158878/samolet-il--md--a-tehnicheskie-harakteristiki-i-foto




      and why the load capacity of 52 tons, when we talked about 60 tons ??? what it is?

      1. gjv
        gjv 13 January 2016 16: 21 New
        +2
        Quote: Sveles
        What does "started" mean? if already in the year 12 they released the first such aircraft?

        Please note that in the article we are talking about the civil modification of IL-76TD-90A, and you refer to the military IL-76MD-90A. There may be some differences in the cargo equipment (and quite significant), as well as the lack of equipment for parachute landing.
        1. Sweles
          Sweles 13 January 2016 16: 35 New
          -1
          Quote: gjv
          Quote: Sveles
          What does "started" mean? if already in the year 12 they released the first such aircraft?

          Please note that in the article we are talking about the civil modification of IL-76TD-90A, and you refer to the military IL-76MD-90A. There may be some differences in the cargo equipment (and quite significant), as well as the lack of equipment for parachute landing.

          you yourself pay attention that you said that MD will be 60t
          http://fb.ru/article/158878/samolet-il--md--a-tehnicheskie-harakteristiki-i-foto

          and in this, as it were called, cut-down article it is said that
          “The onboard radio-electronic equipment will be installed upgraded, similar to the avionics on the IL-76MD-90А. The engines are the same - PS-90-76 on take-off to 14,5 t. The capacity of IL-76TD-90А will be increased from 47 t to 52 t, as on the military version of IL-76МД-90А, ”said the source.

          TD will be carrying capacity, as MD -52t, why confuse so? and where is the truth?
          1. gjv
            gjv 13 January 2016 19: 43 New
            0
            Quote: Sveles
            TD will be carrying capacity, as MD -52t, why confuse so? and where is the truth?

            What is the truth, brother? bully OKB them. S.V. Ilyushin http://www.ilyushin.org/aircrafts/transport/311/
            Maximum payload, t 52 (with development up to 60)

            By the way, the capacity of the IL-76TD-90VD of the Volga-Dnepr company is 50 tons, only 2 tons less.
            1. Sweles
              Sweles 13 January 2016 20: 33 New
              0
              lies about 60t or maybe you have the wrong? ...
              1. gjv
                gjv 13 January 2016 21: 15 New
                0
                Quote: Sveles
                do you have the wrong one? ...

                Plus or minus 200 kg ...
            2. The comment was deleted.
  2. queen
    queen 13 January 2016 15: 45 New
    +2
    For six years, six planes ... how many.
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 13 January 2016 15: 47 New
      +4
      When busy with military orders - a lot. Factories need to be built.
    2. seti
      seti 13 January 2016 15: 49 New
      0
      Quote: regin
      For six years, six planes ... how many.

      Each of them has its own niche and its own tasks. The main thing is that they have a high level of interchangeability and domestic equipment. There was a sales market not only in Russia but also around the world.
  3. seti
    seti 13 January 2016 15: 46 New
    +8
    After understandable complications began with Antonov, there was a bet on Ilyushin and Yakovlev. Everything is logical. It is necessary to develop and improve your own then there will be jobs and profits, and most importantly there will be something to fly on. And flying is safe.
    We look forward to following the Superjet, the next-generation MC-21 aircraft. Moreover, an engine has already been created for it.
  4. alekc73
    alekc73 13 January 2016 15: 48 New
    +2
    Demand will be. Old IL-76 is worn out. In the coming years to be changed.
    1. FID
      FID 13 January 2016 15: 56 New
      +4
      Passenger planes do not change, but you are already talking about trucks ...
  5. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 13 January 2016 15: 48 New
    0
    And how many people fit there? And why didn’t they start building them before?
    1. Gomel
      Gomel 13 January 2016 15: 57 New
      0
      Too rhetorical question :) smile
    2. ver_
      ver_ 13 January 2016 16: 02 New
      0
      ... when it is ready -usya ukraina will fit it ..
    3. Slarch
      Slarch 13 January 2016 16: 02 New
      0
      Military transportation

      paratroopers 126
      personnel / when installing the second deck 145/225
      affected by the installation of sanitary equipment 114


      If passenger seats are installed, then somewhere around 200 passengers.
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 13 January 2016 17: 42 New
        +2
        Quote: Slarch
        If passenger seats are installed, then somewhere around 200 passengers

        Here in this compartment? And if everything is brought to the comfort of a normal passenger airliner, it will be another plane. smile
        1. WUA 518
          WUA 518 13 January 2016 17: 55 New
          +5
          Quote: Bayonet
          comfort of a normal passenger liner, e

          The cargo compartment is slightly longer than 20m (excluding the ramp), now you need to install the luggage compartment, toilets, kitchens, and passenger life support systems. And how much will remain after the rearrangement of space?
    4. faridg7
      faridg7 13 January 2016 16: 03 New
      +2
      This is a transport car, not a passenger one. But it can be equipped to transport troops. I remember we were assigned one side to the company, but there was still a lot of space there. I heard that landing from a ramp was banned, is anyone aware of that? I thought this was generally the safest way.
      1. gjv
        gjv 13 January 2016 16: 34 New
        +2
        Quote: faridg7
        I heard that landing from a ramp was banned, is anyone aware of that?

        Jumps in three and four streams are performed with the permission of the commander of the Airborne Forces or in wartime.
      2. WUA 518
        WUA 518 13 January 2016 17: 42 New
        +3
        Quote: faridg7
        but there was still plenty of space.
        If necessary, on the IL-76MD (M) the crew forces install a suspended second deck in a matter of hours, allowing 225 passengers to be transported.
      3. gjv
        gjv 13 January 2016 21: 24 New
        +2
        Quote: faridg7
        This is a transport car, not a passenger one.

        Transportpassenger, only the "passengers" are specific ... bully

      4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 13 January 2016 16: 25 New
      0
      Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
      And how many people fit there?

      Ask Skiryak. smile
  6. Streich
    Streich 13 January 2016 15: 53 New
    +1
    And why not take this great airline to a real new civilian plane. After all, IL86 and IL96 were wonderful cars. Not much better than this disgrace superjet. I would even think about the old TU144 for our country a very necessary car. Anyway, the carcasses have proven themselves perfectly. For me personally, the most convenient civilian aircraft in all respects is the TU 204. No airbus or Boeing can be compared with him, in second place is IL96.
    1. seti
      seti 13 January 2016 15: 59 New
      +2
      Quote: Streich
      And why not take this great airline to a real new civilian plane. After all, IL86 and IL96 were wonderful cars. Not much better than this disgrace superjet. I would even think about the old TU144 for our country a very necessary car. Anyway, the carcasses have proven themselves perfectly. For me personally, the most convenient civilian aircraft in all respects is the TU 204. No airbus or Boeing can be compared with him, in second place is IL96.

      It has long been taken.
      The aircraft of the MS-21 project is designed to transport passengers, baggage and cargo on domestic and international airlines and is designed to compete with foreign counterparts in all geographical markets. This aircraft has the widest fuselage in the class of medium-range aircraft (4,06 m), which allows passengers and crew to provide comfort comparable to the comfort of the latest generation wide-body aircraft. A lot of 6 billion $ were invested in the program. The cost of a unit is about 80 million $.

      MS-21 our future along with the Superjet
      1. puffnutiy
        puffnutiy 13 January 2016 16: 45 New
        0
        Poghosyan simply intentionally killed many airlines with his Spurjet. It would be nice if the plane came out good and they would buy it like hot cakes, no. A lot of problems.
        Il must do IL-96 and IL-114. And the government should oblige domestic carriers to buy them. Dreams Dreams...
      2. Streich
        Streich 13 January 2016 18: 32 New
        -1
        Thank you, I did not know that MC21 is Ilyushin!
        1. glasha3032
          glasha3032 13 January 2016 19: 26 New
          +1
          MS-21 is the Yak-242 brainchild of Yakovlev Design Bureau and OAO Irkut
        2. samoletil18
          samoletil18 13 January 2016 22: 48 New
          0
          Quote: Streich
          Thank you, I did not know that MC21 is Ilyushin!

          bully good
    2. Engineer
      Engineer 13 January 2016 16: 08 New
      -1
      Because there is nothing worth behind the big words of import substitution: avionics and airborne complexes are completely imported. And the point is to sculpt a new plane, if only our glider is there, and the engine is worse than the imported one. The plane will be more expensive to operate. Because airlines will not buy it. And look at what a high percentage of imported components in the latest domestic aircraft MS-21. Superjet is generally a diversion against our aircraft industry. Our government does not know how to develop the economy. They are waiting for a miracle, i.e. high oil prices and all. Now our aviation is only alive thanks to the military.
  7. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 13 January 2016 16: 04 New
    +2
    Once, the IL 76 was mass-produced in Uzbekistan. Now few people believe it.
    1. puffnutiy
      puffnutiy 13 January 2016 16: 36 New
      +2
      They say that even the remaining gliders were taken from there at the time, and in Russia they were already finishing it.
      1. Horst78
        Horst78 13 January 2016 16: 41 New
        +1
        Quote: puffnutiy
        They say that even the remaining gliders were taken from there at the time, and in Russia they were already finishing it.

        How much all equipment was transported to Russia during the course.
      2. gjv
        gjv 13 January 2016 20: 03 New
        +1
        Quote: puffnutiy
        They say from there they even took some remaining gliders in due time

        Traveling from Tashkent to Taganrog ...








        Two Il-76TD aircraft were transported by road train of SV Trans LLC with the Tashkent Mechanical Plant JSC to the port of Aktau (Caspian Sea), then by water to Taganrog for conversion to TANTK into AWACS aircraft and A-50EI control aircraft (EI) ) for the Indian Air Force.

        Quote: Horst78
        How much all equipment was transported to Russia during the course

        All equipment? This is something with something. And where? recourse
    2. asher
      asher 13 January 2016 17: 06 New
      +1
      Yes there was a time! Actually, when he started working at TAPOiCh in 1985, 5 cars were given per month.
  8. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 13 January 2016 16: 10 New
    0
    Quote: Streich
    And why not take this great airline to a real new civilian plane. After all, IL86 and IL96 were wonderful cars. Not much better than this disgrace superjet. I would even think about the old TU144 for our country a very necessary car. Anyway, the carcasses have proven themselves perfectly. For me personally, the most convenient civilian aircraft in all respects is the TU 204. No airbus or Boeing can be compared with him, in second place is IL96.

    I fully support you!
  9. pavelty
    pavelty 13 January 2016 16: 18 New
    +2
    [quote = seti] [quote = Streich]

    MS-21 is our future along with the Superjet [/ quote]

    Don’t get angry, but as a person I’m a little bit in the subject, I’ll inform you that, unfortunately, before the first flight
    MS-21 is still sooo far, but taking into account how many imported components are there ....
  10. Sakhalin.
    Sakhalin. 13 January 2016 16: 19 New
    0
    Nishtyak, God forbid, go to the series!
    1. twincam
      twincam 13 January 2016 16: 22 New
      0
      Quote: Sakhalin.
      Nishtyak, God forbid, go to the series!

      Nothing.
  11. cte-power
    cte-power 13 January 2016 16: 20 New
    -2
    Quote: Engineer
    Because there is nothing worth behind the big words of import substitution: avionics and airborne complexes are completely imported. And the point is to sculpt a new plane, if only our glider is there, and the engine is worse than the imported one. The plane will be more expensive to operate. Because airlines will not buy it. And look at what a high percentage of imported components in the latest domestic aircraft MS-21. Superjet is generally a diversion against our aircraft industry. Our government does not know how to develop the economy. They are waiting for a miracle, i.e. high oil prices and all. Now our aviation is only alive thanks to the military.


    kill against the wall engineer
  12. twincam
    twincam 13 January 2016 16: 22 New
    0
    Good plane
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 13 January 2016 16: 34 New
    0
    Well. You look and OJSC "IL" will breathe deeply.
  14. puffnutiy
    puffnutiy 13 January 2016 16: 46 New
    0
    But what about the IL-106 and the theme of "Ermak"?
  15. COLLECTOR-2015
    COLLECTOR-2015 13 January 2016 17: 19 New
    0
    The news is definitely pleasing. It is necessary to supply airplanes not only to the army but also to the "citizen", so that the enterprise and the entire industry develop.
  16. Ros 56
    Ros 56 13 January 2016 17: 43 New
    +1
    It’s strange, as a transport or commercial one, it’s understandable, but there is a modernized (elongated) IL-76, there is an An-124 Ruslan. And as a passenger, what's the point. There is an IL-96, upgrade, fly. Reminds cut dough.
  17. aba
    aba 13 January 2016 19: 30 New
    0
    Good news! However, it’s always nice to read what airplanes do in Russia, but the fact that almost all of our civil aviation is imported is disappointing. I read that our civilian aircraft are not allowed abroad in terms of noise. But only last December, flew a Boeing 757-200. So from the noise in the cabin it is not possible to talk with a neighbor through a chair. Something I do not remember this on our Carcasses. And how to understand that ?!
  18. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 13 January 2016 19: 38 New
    0
    And I'm sorry AN 70 is a sad fate.
  19. Demon_blood
    Demon_blood 13 January 2016 21: 11 New
    +4
    The Americans put their seats on their Globemaster III transports and everyone is happy, nothing needs to be invented
    1. Andrey55
      Andrey55 14 January 2016 07: 18 New
      +2
      Well, ours can do that too.
  20. Andrey55
    Andrey55 14 January 2016 07: 43 New
    +1
    Actually, this article is about planning the release of a civilian version of a military transport aircraft. In many comments, the types and names of passenger liners are voiced, as if the transport vehicle cannot be civilian. For example, at the Tashkent factory since 1978, modifications of the IL-76 for GA were mass-produced.
    IL-76T Transport. Civil modification of the IL-76M. On the plane, a stern cannon mount, a dipole reflector ejection machine, landing equipment and military electronic devices were dismantled.
    IL-76TD Transport far. Civil modification of the IL-76MD. Dismantled military equipment. The vehicle's carrying capacity was 50 tons. The maximum take-off weight was 190 tons. The range with a maximum load of 3600 km.
    IL-76TD-90VD Civil modification of the aircraft IL-76TD. Uses more efficient PS-90A-76 engines (IL-76TD-90VD). Modified under the leadership of Volga-Dnepr Airlines (IL-76TD-90VD). The aircraft of this modification meets the ICAO requirements for noise on the ground.