Military Review
Sign in Sign up

Iran reports the detention of two US Navy ships (boats) in its territorial waters

53
TV channel Press TV spread the information that Iran has detained two ships (boats) of the US Navy near the Iranian island of Farsi (Persian Gulf). The report said that one of the American ships (boats) "lost speed" and went into the territorial waters of Iran, the second followed him. At that time, the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle was near the US warships (boats), which, as they say in Paris, is participating in an antiterrorist operation against the DAISH (IS). The aircraft carrier did not enter the territorial waters of Iran.


Iran reports the detention of two US Navy ships (boats) in its territorial waters


Information Agency Associated Press reports that both American ships stopped communicating at the moment when they were in the waters of the bay between Kuwait and Bahrain. White House spokesman Josh Ernest said that the Iranian side guaranteed security to the crew members of the US Navy, and also assured that both ships would soon be able to continue their journey after conducting an incident check.

This is one of the extremely rare cases in which communication, as they say in Washington, is lost with American warships, and which “unintentionally” enter foreign territorial waters, “off the course.” The “drift” of the two ships of the US Navy, strangely caught in the territorial waters of Iran, is more than a strange phenomenon, given the constant focus of the United States on provocations of a different nature.
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Google News
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dezinto
    Dezinto 13 January 2016 06: 32
    +9
    An absolute coincidence ....

    American boats off the coast of Iran - well, just by mistake ... of course.
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 13 January 2016 06: 44
      24
      Quote: DEZINTO

      American boats off the coast of Iran - well, just by mistake ... of course.

      I think as casually as in the 88th year in the Black Sea.
      So to say, reconnaissance in battle.
      Not pierced, not scared Iranian sailors.
      1. ASUR
        ASUR 13 January 2016 08: 28
        +1
        I completely agree:
        Size doesn't matter :)
    2. Mahmut
      Mahmut 13 January 2016 06: 48
      17
      Understand and forgive. Lower and let go.
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 13 January 2016 07: 00
        +2
        Quote: Mahmut
        Understand and forgive. Lower and let go.

        A source in the US government said that Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif assured John Kerry in the speedy resolution of the situation with the Navy courts.
        Understood and forgiven smile
      2. The black
        The black 13 January 2016 08: 04
        +4
        Well, yes. Now the US sailors will finish off, take a shower, have breakfast, refuel for free and move on to protect the WORLD on Planet Earth laughing
      3. meriem1
        meriem1 13 January 2016 10: 59
        +1
        Quote: Mahmut
        Understand and forgive. Lower and let go.

        Or act like Turks !!!! Drown and let them howl later.
    3. Letun
      Letun 13 January 2016 07: 04
      +4
      Provocations with ships and planes are a favorite move of the "exceptional nation".
    4. Belarus
      Belarus 13 January 2016 07: 42
      +2
      Rafik is not guilty ...)))
    5. Lelek
      Lelek 13 January 2016 08: 26
      17
      Quote: DEZINTO
      American boats off the coast of Iran - well, just by mistake


      No, not by mistake. Iran is certainly to blame, arrogantly bringing its territorial borders to the boats of the most exclusive US in the world. bully
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 13 January 2016 23: 21
        0
        Quote: Lelek
        Quote: DEZINTO
        American boats off the coast of Iran - well, just by mistake


        No, not by mistake. Iran is certainly to blame, arrogantly bringing its territorial borders to the boats of the most exclusive US in the world. bully

        Conversation of an American aircraft carrier with a Spanish lighthouse at Cape Finisterre (Galicia).
        Spaniards (clutter in the background):
        - ... Says A-853, please turn 15 degrees south to avoid a collision with us. You are moving right at us, a distance of 25 nautical miles.
        Americans (background noise):
        - We advise you to turn 15 degrees to the north to avoid a collision with us.
        Spaniards:
        - The answer is negative. Repeat, turn 15 degrees south to avoid a collision.
        Americans (different voice):
        “The captain of the ship of the United States of America is speaking to you.” Turn 15 degrees north to avoid a collision.
        Spaniards:
        “We do not consider your proposal either possible or adequate; we advise you to turn 15 degrees south so as not to crash into us.”
        Americans (in elevated tones):
        - CAPTAIN RICHARD JAMES HOWARD SPEAKS TO YOU, USS LINCOLN AIRCRAFT COMMANDER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECOND BY THE MAJORITY OF THE Navy OF THE AMERICAN Navy. We are escorted by 2 cruisers, 6 destroyers, 4 submarines and numerous support ships. I DO NOT ADVISE YOU - I ORDER TO CHANGE YOUR COURSE BY 15 DEGREES IN THE NORTH. OTHERWISE, WE WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE THE NECESSARY MEASURES TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR SHIP. PLEASE IMMEDIATELY REMOVE OUR COURSE !!!
        Spaniards:
        “Juan Manuel Salas Alcantara is speaking to you.” There are two of us. We are accompanied by a dog, dinner, 2 bottles of beer and a canary, which is now sleeping. We are supported by the radio station and channel 106 “Extreme situations at sea”. We are not going to turn anywhere, given that we are on land and are the A-853 lighthouse on Cape Finisterre of the Galician coast of Spain. We have no idea what place we have in size among the Spanish lighthouses. You can accept everything ... !!! measures that you consider necessary, and do anything to ensure your safety ... !!! ship that will smash into smithereens on the rocks. Therefore, once again, we strongly recommend that you do the most meaningful thing: change your course 15 degrees south to avoid a collision.
        Americans:
        - OK, accepted, thanks. lol
    6. GRAY
      GRAY 13 January 2016 09: 35
      +1
      Quote: DEZINTO
      American boats off the coast of Iran - well, just by mistake ... of course.

      In theory, the amers should not have boats there. The only thing that comes to mind is landing boats. We saw the Iranians and immediately "broke", oga.
      1. Gomel
        Gomel 13 January 2016 15: 16
        +3
        American Patrol Boat Cyclone

        photo by the way from the Persian Gulf
    7. Aleksander
      Aleksander 13 January 2016 11: 04
      +3
      Quote: DEZINTO
      American boats off the coast of Iran - well, just by mistake ... of course

      This often happens between countries that have a common sea border — swam in the Gulf of Mexico and marry!request-proved in Persian .... lol
  2. 24rus
    24rus 13 January 2016 06: 33
    +1
    Provocation. Classic
  3. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 13 January 2016 06: 33
    +2
    It was also necessary to "accidentally" let them feed the sharks, and take the boats for themselves.
    1. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 13 January 2016 09: 12
      +1
      Moreover, their connection supposedly died. Cover for electronic warranties and flood. And then say that they did not see any boats at all. Well, what is the interference on the air - so this transformer on the island sparked a faulty one.
      1. Angry orc
        Angry orc 13 January 2016 16: 04
        0
        Boats sailed into the anomalous zone and disappeared from the radar screens)
  4. evgeny1979
    evgeny1979 13 January 2016 06: 34
    0
    Put all the fuck like spies.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 13 January 2016 07: 25
      +1
      In Yandex news, a message appeared that the crews will release on 13.01.2016/XNUMX/XNUMX, not a word to the rental car.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 13 January 2016 11: 15
        0
        Boats were left to themselves - there is equipment.
  5. BLOND
    BLOND 13 January 2016 06: 39
    0
    What can I say ...
    Well done Iran !!!
    lowered phashington!

    ... even Ukrainian sailors in Crimea, when asked to surrender, shouted in response, "The Russians do not surrender!"
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 13 January 2016 07: 28
      +2
      Quote: BLOND

      ... even Ukrainian sailors in Crimea, when asked to surrender, shouted in response, "The Russians do not surrender!"

      You read it on the Censor wink Strange, they somehow didn’t give up, everyone raised the Andreev flags laughing
      1. BLOND
        BLOND 13 January 2016 08: 25
        +1
        "Slavutich" -The control ship was built as a large reconnaissance ship, launched in 1990, was completed for Ukraine. Taken by storm by Russian special forces and self-defense, the crew went ashore

        The mine action ship was built in Leningrad in 1977. In 1997 it became a part of the Naval Forces of Ukraine, was named "Cherkassy". During the assault on Lake Donuzlav, the administration was destroyed, along with the flag of Ukraine, a Russian

        "Konstantin Olshansky" - a large landing ship was built in Poland in 1985, named after the lieutenant of the hero of the USSR. With the division of the fleet, it went to Ukraine. On March 24, he was captured on Donuzlav Lake. A crew of 20 destroyed the ship's electronics and engine and was towed to the pier


        Alas, not all surrendered themselves (what does Cesor have to do with it)
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 13 January 2016 08: 47
          +1
          Quote: BLOND

          Alas, not all surrendered themselves (what does Cesor have to do with it)

          About the Russians they don’t give up they wrote on Censor. I myself read this dregs, that's why I remember.
          1. BLOND
            BLOND 13 January 2016 10: 10
            0
            I have never been to Censor and other dill sites
            (I will try to find the source where I read)
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 13 January 2016 12: 37
      0
      Quote: BLOND
      What can I say ... Well done Iran !!! lowered fascington!

      So phishington counted on this. The usual provocation and intelligence gathering.
      -How fast will she be loaded? What forces will be attracted to counteract and will there be any actions at all? - etc.
      But ideally, the mattresses probably counted on the fact that Iran would sink any boat out of the two, and the second was as insurance in order to pull out the sailors, and then unwind sanctions and other "troubles" against Iran, up to the use of force. Broke off.
  6. Dmitrii210
    Dmitrii210 13 January 2016 06: 39
    -1
    I can’t understand why Iran is shouting about it. If they caught it, they had to cut it quietly and that’s all.
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 13 January 2016 06: 46
      -1
      Quote: Dmitrii210
      I can’t understand why Iran is shouting about it. If they caught it, they had to cut it quietly and that’s all.

      Oh well. This is exactly what they need. Or are you so naive, and you think these two boats, so go fishing on your own initiative, went there? Yes, they cannot fart without an order from above.
  7. bronik
    bronik 13 January 2016 06: 41
    +3
    Help repair and let go. Let the brains begin to boil in the Pentagon.
    And the mines under the bottom will then work.
  8. corporal
    corporal 13 January 2016 06: 42
    +1
    "Inadvertently" enter foreign territorial waters, "straying off course."
    What does the law of the sea say about this?
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 13 January 2016 06: 46
    +4
    Well, what are all bloodthirsty. Cut to feed sharks ... Another thing is surprising - not that the boat broke - everything breaks, and everyone has it. And the fact that the second boat did not come to the rescue, did not take it in tow, or something. A provocation is that hegemonic sailors consider any territorial waters of any state their own. Did you feel the coastal defense? In the plan - how are the territorial waters in a particular place covered by radars?
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 13 January 2016 06: 57
      0
      hegemonic sailors consider any territorial waters of any states their

      Totally agree with you. And then they express surprise at why they did this to them, and even begin to threaten. That this provocation is understandable. Another thing is not clear - what did the Americans expect?
  10. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 13 January 2016 06: 48
    +4
    A slap in the US is deafening.
    1. sleeping sayan
      sleeping sayan 13 January 2016 06: 56
      0
      And as Jews, as allies of the United States, they will react to this news.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 13 January 2016 07: 29
        0
        Quote: Sleeping Sayan
        as Jews, as allies of the United States, will react to this news.

        Given that this is asking a person under the flag of the USA ............ uh, Jin Psaki? You have not been seen for a long time.
        1. sleeping sayan
          sleeping sayan 13 January 2016 08: 18
          0
          You, by yourself, do not judge Hillary.
    2. ImPerts
      ImPerts 13 January 2016 07: 02
      +2
      In order not to receive stars, it is better not to go where they are distributed))) Or to bypass these distribution points)))
  11. asiat_61
    asiat_61 13 January 2016 06: 51
    0
    In my opinion, a breakdown could really happen. And no need to inflate, like: cut everyone.
  12. Lawrence
    Lawrence 13 January 2016 06: 59
    0
    How dare they detain the boats of the "most powerful" country?
  13. 24rus
    24rus 13 January 2016 07: 02
    0
    Scouts were taken from the shore
  14. pv1005
    pv1005 13 January 2016 07: 04
    +3
    That is what Iran is not a member of NATO. Sheltered, warmed and even released home. Well, undemocratic like that. They needed a rocket, a rocket, like the beams of democracy do.
  15. Dmitrii210
    Dmitrii210 13 January 2016 07: 19
    0
    Quote: Sirocco
    Quote: Dmitrii210
    I can’t understand why Iran is shouting about it. If they caught it, they had to cut it quietly and that’s all.

    Oh well. This is exactly what they need. Or are you so naive, and you think these two boats, so go fishing on your own initiative, went there? Yes, they cannot fart without an order from above.

    You are just naive dear. If they raise a cry, they automatically recognize aggressive intentions towards a sovereign state.
  16. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 13 January 2016 07: 20
    +1
    They won't just leave Iran alone, the mattresses are bogged down too much in attempts to bend this country. Two boats are a probing, so to speak, "support of the tone" of the Iranian border guards. Not even a test of the reaction of the Iranian leadership, not without it. I don't know what the mattresses were counting on, but it was clearly not according to their scenario: everything was civilized, without aggressive rhetoric. Calmly accepted, calmly examined and just as calmly sent to their own. Hi McCain.
  17. Senior manager
    Senior manager 13 January 2016 07: 25
    0
    Ordinary ignorance of geography and the rules of navigation is a very slow thinking crew of boats. High probability of provocation, or special task.
  18. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 13 January 2016 07: 35
    +1
    if they came to our shores of the boat, we would express concern and prohibit the sale of American peanut butter in Russia.
  19. Junior, I
    Junior, I 13 January 2016 07: 37
    +3
    Well done Americans, they conduct their double politics and game. Electronics is not eternal, but also the human factor is present. The captain’s mistake, the failure in the electronics, everything can be attributed. They previously made themselves a corridor from which you can exit.
    There is a good saying: Before you enter somewhere, think how to get out of there!
    She works for them !!! more precisely, they stick to it.
    1. askort154
      askort154 13 January 2016 10: 21
      0
      Junior, I ... Americans are great, they are conducting their double policy and game.
      .... There is a good saying: Before you enter somewhere, think how to get out of there!
      She works for them !!! more precisely, they stick to it.

      They came out especially "nicely" from Iraq and Afghanistan.
      As practice has shown, Americans enter briskly to shift their disloyal power, and go out awkwardly, leaving behind a devastation and chaos.
  20. bmv04636
    bmv04636 13 January 2016 08: 04
    0
    as always, the zhoporez got it wrong laughing
  21. gukoyan
    gukoyan 13 January 2016 08: 22
    -1
    The ancient technique of the Omerikans often breaks ... And then there is a stream of how it took evil boats to Iran ...
  22. uge.garik
    uge.garik 13 January 2016 08: 30
    0
    ... well, yes, the connection has disappeared - to transfer the rescued sailors to their homeland, and let the ships drift - let the owner save if he finds ...
  23. private person
    private person 13 January 2016 08: 33
    +1
    Amerekosov will be fed, given to drink and released. And if our ships "accidentally" found themselves in the waters of an unfriendly country, what would happen? If they had not sunk, then the whole world would have raised probably what a hoo.
  24. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 13 January 2016 08: 45
    +3
    In light of recent discussions about the desire of the Saudis and their patrons to provoke Iran in order to again strangle it with sanctions, this incident can also be viewed from this side. And if the Iranians could not restrain themselves? A howl would have begun - the ship, the fiends, the enemies of the human race, attacked the wrecked ship, and here are sanctions for Iran for another ten years. Not a ride, but these guys still come up with something, they are very persistent when they need something.
  25. From Samara
    From Samara 13 January 2016 09: 11
    0
    Seals from the MTR of the Navy ...
  26. Just felix
    Just felix 13 January 2016 11: 58
    +1
    One boat broke down, the other disconnecting the connection went to the rescue so that everything was quiet, without noise, but they were noticed. And as already mentioned above, the sailors will be fed and put to sleep in general as best friends. Of course, Iran, on the eve of entering the oil and maybe the gas market, will not rock the boat against the United States, although if it were a year ago ...
  27. Captain45
    Captain45 13 January 2016 14: 58
    +1
    The article says:At that time, near the American warships (boats) was the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, which, as stated in Paris, was involved in the anti-terrorist operation against Daesh (IS). The aircraft carrier did not enter Iran’s territorial waters.
    As far as I can remember, initially "Charles de Gaulle" was in the Mediterranean Sea near the coast of Syria. Putin, as shown on TV, gave instructions to the commander of the RRC "Moscow" not to offend and interact with the French, they say they are our partners. When "Charlot" Did I move to the Persian Gulf? What have I missed or is there an error in the article on its location? request
    1. Gomel
      Gomel 13 January 2016 15: 10
      +1
      Yes, they did.
      after what you called, there was a shout from Washington (about the correct coalition) and the "old rattletrap" quietly without show-off and media coverage moved to the Persian Gulf.

      All this was informationally blotted out by a showdown with Erdogan, etc.
      I don’t understand everything. I missed the development of the Ukrainian contract with Thailand, Putin’s interview with Bilda and the little things.
  28. ICT
    ICT 14 January 2016 23: 38
    +1
    it's a shame