Military Review

Strolling on? ..

107
Watching the meetings in the State Duma of the Russian Federation, you often catch yourself thinking that the deputies of the lower house of the Russian parliament, unfortunately, are not the people who can be an example of our schoolchildren and students in terms of attendance at “classes”. To say to careless students: you look, idiot, at the hall of the Duma meetings and at your audience - take an example from people's representatives, because they are all alone in their seats! .. But in reality there are vacant seats not warmed by fifth points of parliamentarians, more often in times more than places occupied. Sometimes, even with a quick glance, it becomes clear that: a) the hall is empty rather than full, b) some parliamentarians “sit out” for themselves and for that guy, and in addition also vote for their faction colleagues, unceremoniously walking along the rows.


Strolling on? ..


And where are these same colleagues? If officially, the majority works in the regions, has endless meetings with voters on the ground or is outside the walls of the Duma’s meeting room for other purely, of course, valid reasons, including illness, severe ailments or a long delay in the cafeteria or restroom (it happens that the delay is measured in days ...).

Unfortunately, there are no official statistics on the hands of how many Russian deputies, on average, attend meetings on a daily basis (actually present and actually vote on their own behalf). If we consider the issue from the position of an observer for the voting panel, then everything is always in order - the majority is present, there is a quorum, things are going. But the sitting chairs, gaping in emptiness, say that with the attendance of our respected elected representatives not all thank God ...

It turned out that such a problem worries not only the average man in the street, but also the deputies themselves - first of all those who are used to working honestly themselves and are ready to demand the same from other colleagues. So, in October 2015, a group of deputies prepared amendments to the Federal Law “On the status of a member of the Federation Council and the status of a deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation”. The deputies (and it just so happened that all the authors of the amendments to the federal law represent the LDPR faction) Svintsov, Lebedev, Kalyuzhny, Nilov and Zolochevsky proposed to punish those parliamentarians who systematically miss meetings, ignore their official duties and in fact disrupt the legislative work. What could be the punishment? It was suggested that careless parliamentarians (both Duma members and senators) be deprived of a mandate not only for systematic absenteeism of meetings, but also for ignoring such work as meetings with voters, visits to the districts from which they were elected (appointed). The authors of the draft laws suggested the possibility of an intra-factional fine for careless colleagues - punishment up to the recall of the mandate.

Representatives of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia began to work on identifying malicious violators of the set of duties. The picture in the end was very interesting. So, at once, five deputies from this faction never (!) Ever attended meetings of the State Duma. Other fractions of data about the hard-core shirkers decided not to submit for some reason known to them ...

It is quite natural that the deputies who do not fulfill their direct duties, it’s time to bring to justice until the deprivation of the mandate, and such an initiative has matured, although it is late, but it’s better late than never. It seemed that a regulatory document would finally appear that would deprive the notorious “deputy” Ilya Ponomarev of the “crust” of the parliamentarian — the very Ponomarev, to whom the investigation of the Skolkovo case has many questions, and that since last year parliamentary immunity) "deputies", being outside not only the building of the State Duma, but also outside Russia. It would seem that an effective tool will finally emerge, thanks to which people's representatives and the representative of the Federation Council will feel direct responsibility for avoiding the fulfillment of official duties.

However, this should happen, the initiative did not pass ... Yes, yes ... It did not pass.

The question arises: who “braked” a very sensible idea? It is surprising (or not surprising) that the government of the country acted as a brake. According to the newspaper "News"It was the Cabinet of Ministers that rejected the amendments, stating that the people were electing deputies, and this is precisely what could not allow “to revise the election results.”

An interesting statement, isn't it? It turns out that the Russian government is cutting its wings not only to the amendments prepared by lawmakers, but also to the federal law "On the status of a member of the Federation Council and the status of a deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation." This law has Chapter II, “Guarantees for the activities of a member of the Federation Council, a State Duma deputy,” and the 12.3 clause http://base.garant.ru/10118919/2/#block_200, which sounds like this:

A member of the Council of Federation, a State Duma deputy is required to take a personal part in a meeting of the relevant chamber of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, a committee, commission, conciliation and special commissions of which they are members, in the manner prescribed by the regulations of the chambers of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. If it is impossible to attend a meeting of the relevant chamber of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, a committee, commission, conciliation and special commissions for good reason, a member of the Federation Council, a State Duma deputy shall inform the Chairman of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation Federation, the chairman of the committee, commission, co-chairman of the conciliation and specifically th commissions. Responsibility for the absence at a meeting of the relevant chamber of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of a member of the Council of Federation, a deputy of the State Duma without a valid reason is established by the regulations of the chambers of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.


The law, apparently, states the need for personal participation in the chambers' meetings and responsibility, which is determined inside each of the chambers for the absence of meetings without a valid reason.

It turns out that in the regulations of the chambers there is not a word about responsibility for absenteeism. Words appear in the amendments proposed by the deputies, but these amendments, as already noted, were rejected in the cabinet of ministers.

It turns out to be a paradoxical situation: if a deputy passes to the State Duma (for example, according to parliamentary lists) and does not appear in the Duma from the first day of meetings, is deprivation of his mandate considered “revision of the election results”? If the government thinks so, then this is the real freemen for all sorts of loafers at the level of legislative power. Moreover, this is freemen for corrupt officials of the highest level.
If the same deputy Ponomarev openly declares that someone in the Duma votes for him, while he himself travels around the United States trading Russian interests, then it comes out (at the suggestion of government officials) that even he can feel calm - deputy salary will continue to flow into his account.

It is possible to drive the “deputy” Ponomarev to “abroad”, but, for example, the hypothetical lieutenant Tsutskin cannot, because Lieutenant Tsutskin is a “carrier” of a terrible state (military) secret. “Deputy” Ponomarev, would become such a carrier is not, and no consequences in the law for it is not provided.

This theater of the absurd! It is difficult to choose a different definition ... It turns out that the government issues indulgences to crooks who are elected by the people and do not fulfill their duties? Strangeness, which is difficult to explain by a desire for legality ...
Author:
Photos used:
www.kle.no
107 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 13 January 2016 06: 23
    21
    "who does not work, he eats, you confused dad ..." V.S. Vysotsky
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 13 January 2016 06: 33
      21
      The neighbor said that he is the people!
      What the basic law observes-
      Like, he who doesn’t eat doesn’t drink!
      And drank by the way ....

      And further down the text!
      1. Riv
        Riv 13 January 2016 07: 55
        13
        My neighbor traveled all over the Union.
        He’s looking for something, and what is not visible.
        I don’t bother with other people's affairs
        But I am very bitter and offended.

        He has plush and silk on his windows,
        Baba roaming around in his bathrobe.
        I would have found uranium with a pick in Moscow
        With such an increased salary ...
    2. Ruslan
      Ruslan 13 January 2016 08: 15
      18
      what claims do you have to the monkeys? as correctly said Yu.m. Mukhin, without responsibility (in any form) to the people, any sheep can sit in the leadership, this will not change anything. any trained dogs can be planted, buttons will also be jammed. still surprised at this situation!
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 13 January 2016 08: 56
        20
        Someone tell me why people tend to go to parliament? Is it really in order to make the life of the people better? - Damn it, they go there to solve their financial affairs and satisfy their irrepressible ambitions. They hold on to their places by all possible means, from there they cannot be pulled out by anything. Only those who for various reasons could not fit into the "team" leave their seats. In our country, being a deputy is a business and not a bad one, that's where you have to dance.
        1. bandabas
          bandabas 13 January 2016 12: 45
          +5
          Well no. There are people. Only, as a rule, they do not fall into deputies. And if they do, then this codla eats them quickly.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 13 January 2016 10: 09
        +8
        Brilliant offer. We chose gymnasts, singers and other chosen ones in the State Duma, so the body of the country is a little more useful in higher legislation than from a dog. So I urge United Russia to go all the way and create in the State Duma a fraction of dogs, kitties, monkeys, hamsters, etc. Give the voter the opportunity to take his initiative and voted for his beloved animal! Voters are pleased, but it will not affect the adoption of the next budget anyway!
      3. stopkran
        stopkran 13 January 2016 12: 08
        +1
        In some situations, these sheep do not even press buttons, but openly engage in sabotage!

        MPs from parties in EP and SR are engaged in sabotage in Goduma! Voting on the draft law on the Central Bank. 14.10.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX
        The trap for the traitors of the Motherland from the EP party in the State Duma of the Russian Federation slammed with a fat catch.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9q_z41nFrk

        Who influenced the deputies of the State Duma?
        http://nstarikov.livejournal.com/1474485.html
    3. goose
      goose 13 January 2016 09: 48
      +6
      Salary is proportional to responsibility and work, if they are not, why should the salary?
      1. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 13 January 2016 10: 12
        11
        Do you still naively believe that deputies work for a salary? Yes, they themselves are ready to pay extra for parliamentary immunity. Actually, they pay extra, and how, you know what a "competition" for a paid department of the State Duma! And in general, at the present time a deputy is not a job, but an honorary title.
        1. washi
          washi 13 January 2016 12: 01
          +1
          Quote: Nikolai K
          Do you still naively believe that deputies work for a salary? Yes, they themselves are ready to pay extra for parliamentary immunity. Actually, they pay extra, and how, you know what a "competition" for a paid department of the State Duma! And in general, at the present time a deputy is not a job, but an honorary title.

          Give the Constitution of 37 years without amendments introduced by the Party Congress. All power to the Soviets. Power to the workers, peasants and cooperatives. Down with private ownership of the means of production.
          For the development of industry and agricultural carry out reforms, including financial one, like Zverev’s reform.
          We are not the west. There is no room for egoism. Give collectivism.
          And this is not funny. Only together can you do something. Alone in Taiga it’s hard to survive. And we announced a Safari. And this is a big difference.
          And about the deputies ........
          Remove the regional (regional). The rest will do without finances at the local level (the main thing is that the KGB should work, not protect). Society sends federal deputies to the Duma. Get out of the impoverished area - sit in the transition. You receive financing from the center - sit in the transition. Earned on the public domain - the transition. Earned the mind - rent the house.
          Not for nothing that in the Middle Ages they appointed those who looked after the pot of His Majesty. Everyone must know their place. If you are supposed to develop the Far East, then make or ready for yourself and your family a family zone (such as farmers by the thorn). What produced, then ate (Sterligov example)
          1. stopkran
            stopkran 13 January 2016 13: 01
            18
            Bismarck on the salary of civil servants.
            1. Halfunra
              Halfunra 13 January 2016 15: 57
              0
              A plus! Plus! Plus!
              Once, it was in Siberia, went to the local elections. For some reason, he did not appear on the voter lists. To recover, you needed a document from the court that I, this is me. And this is the day and hour of the election. The court confirmed my living status, so the election commission sent me to ZHEK for a certificate of my residence permit. By 19-30, I collected all the papers.
              Then a polite uncle, from the local leaders, took me by the elbow to the side and privately in my ear, said that they had already voted for me and I could go to the buffet.
              Let's go to hell! I’ll need it in the buffet. drinks hi
        2. stopkran
          stopkran 13 January 2016 12: 59
          +2
          And the assistant deputy is also very willing to pay for the post! Personally, I was familiar with such an organism ..))
          1. venedofruss
            venedofruss 13 January 2016 14: 20
            +1
            and how did this organism behave?
          2. venedofruss
            venedofruss 13 January 2016 14: 20
            0
            and how did this organism behave?
      2. TORMAN
        TORMAN 13 January 2016 11: 17
        +5
        Irresponsibility, idiocy, corruption - this is their work, in the literal sense of the word, work, well paid and useful. The question, who needs it, is a "forbidden" topic.
    4. sherp2015
      sherp2015 13 January 2016 09: 50
      +4
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      who does not work, he eats, you confused dad ... "V.S. Vysotsky


      It’s time to disperse such a parliament. Choose normal people from the common people, from the hinterland - they understand more in life than the sybarites torn from it. How do sloths and chatterboxes get there? Therefore, our production is almost destroyed, and most of the people are without normal work. Well, look at their faces, look closely: well, what good can be expected, for example, from Isaev? All his wishes are written on his face.
      1. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 13 January 2016 10: 20
        +4
        The offer is good, but two questions: who will disperse and what prevented us from electing such people for the last time? You read the former Deputy Head of Presidential Administration Surkov about his theory of controlled democracy. Actually, it has long been implemented. Well, this is when people think that it is he who controls the state, but in fact participates in a political show.
      2. TORMAN
        TORMAN 13 January 2016 11: 21
        -1
        How to disperse this, what are the country's goals for the future, and the government is being formed for these goals, deputies are being recruited, and the president is being selected.
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 13 January 2016 14: 16
      -1
      Previously, on a collective farm, a workday was indicated with a stick in the payroll. Is it time for deputies to insert real sticks for passes? Or is there no Negro in Moscow? Soap at the expense of the budget.belay
    6. Genur
      Genur 13 January 2016 19: 08
      0
      They would pay more, perhaps they would come ... for pay.
    7. alich
      alich 13 January 2016 21: 32
      0
      And what does the labor code not apply to deputies? After all, for 3 absenteeism in production they dismiss without talking! And the demand from the deputy must be more stringent!
  2. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 13 January 2016 06: 25
    31
    It’s time to shoot a third, plant a third, a third if they do not want to work to drive out.
    1. Kibalchish
      Kibalchish 13 January 2016 06: 52
      23
      It’s better to shoot everyone. laughing There is no sense anyway - one harm and loss.
      1. adept666
        adept666 13 January 2016 07: 42
        +8
        It’s better to shoot everyone. laughing There is no sense anyway - one harm and loss.

        I ask Volfovich to leave, who else will carry the uterus to the masses? laughing
        1. Nikolay K
          Nikolay K 13 January 2016 10: 23
          +4
          Volfycha is no longer funny; it's time to look for a younger replacement.
      2. kryuger.mark
        kryuger.mark 13 January 2016 10: 08
        +4
        450 parasites are too much for the country's budget at such a time. It is high time to cut this thought in two, but whoever cut it, they won’t cut themselves.
        1. Kombrig
          Kombrig 13 January 2016 15: 15
          +1
          Quote: kryuger.mark
          they themselves will not reduce them.



          A raven will not peck out a crow's eyes ... Deputies are really like crows, as soon as they are driven from one "tree" they will circle around, you look and sow something new ...
      3. shasherin.pavel
        shasherin.pavel 13 January 2016 10: 14
        0
        Quote: Kibalchish
        It’s better to shoot everyone
        But what about us without Zhirinovsky? Who will amuse us. Do you know, when Peter I executed many for resisting his reforms, but he always forgave one, said: "At least the jester must tell me the truth." Leave Zhirinovsky!
        1. TORMAN
          TORMAN 13 January 2016 11: 36
          +2
          Then let the little Zhirik in clown clothes walk.
      4. Vadim237
        Vadim237 13 January 2016 11: 05
        +1
        It is better to cut the Duma in two - one devil is not half in place.
    2. Junior, I
      Junior, I 13 January 2016 07: 16
      12
      First you need to return the firing article.
      And nobody will do that. Who wants to dig a hole for themselves.
      1. Kibalchish
        Kibalchish 13 January 2016 07: 25
        12
        THESE, naturally, if they return the execution, it is only for the people. But...

        [V.I. Lenin, 1913 g.]
        "For a revolution it is not enough that the lower classes do not want to live as before. It also requires that the upper classes cannot manage and govern as before."
        1. Sirocco
          Sirocco 13 January 2016 07: 39
          +1
          Quote: Kibalchish
          "It's not enough for a revolution

          There is also a third, but not superfluous. Serving buns and hot tea with denyushka. If not for the third, there would be no revolution. I think so.
          1. Kibalchish
            Kibalchish 13 January 2016 07: 43
            11
            The fact is that it is impossible to cause a revolution from the outside, if conditions have not developed inside. Though a rash of gold.
            1. Cap.Morgan
              Cap.Morgan 13 January 2016 08: 48
              +2
              A revolution can be called from without.
              Accordingly, preparing the opinion of the people. Discontent can always be caused by something because there are no ideal schemes of government.
            2. afdjhbn67
              afdjhbn67 13 January 2016 10: 19
              +1
              Quote: Kibalchish
              The fact is that it is impossible to cause a revolution from the outside, if conditions have not developed inside. Though a rash of gold.

              That's right Igor, that's why the Kremlin is afraid of the "Orange Revolution" - we preach everything made in USA .. forgetting about the existing preconditions inside the country (Georgia, Ukraine, etc.)
          2. TORMAN
            TORMAN 13 January 2016 11: 37
            +2
            the third comes where they are waiting
        2. shasherin.pavel
          shasherin.pavel 13 January 2016 10: 16
          +3
          Quote: Kibalchish
          the tops could not manage and manage,

          So they don’t want to manage and manage, and then they will cry that they hang them on the lanterns.
    3. shasherin.pavel
      shasherin.pavel 13 January 2016 10: 10
      +4
      shoot a third, plant a third, De, zhavyu! I remember the "congress of the executed" in Stalin's times. Oh, what fluffy and pink "tyrant" shot. However, calls to sacrifice millions of Russians to the "world revolution" stopped and the words about "world revolution" disappeared from the Constitution. Discipline in the government also rose after that ... anarchy disappeared from the consciousness of the deputies.
    4. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K 13 January 2016 10: 21
      12 th
      Putin, Medvedev, Shoigu. In what order do you propose to shoot and expel?
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 13 January 2016 11: 05
        +2
        Quote: Nikolai K
        Putin, Medvedev, Shoigu.

        This is all the berries of one field .. still Lavrov forgot to add perhaps Rogozin, only this does not change anything, they are all smeared with one myrrh.
      2. Private27
        Private27 13 January 2016 12: 06
        0
        But they are not in the Duma. This is the government. Although Mendel did not interfere with the wall.
        1. Nikolay K
          Nikolay K 13 January 2016 14: 52
          -1
          And so, and in our country are all the troubles from the Duma? Those. You propose to shoot 150 people of deputies and happiness has come to us forever and ever. Do you believe in it yourself, or did you blurt out without thinking?
    5. TORMAN
      TORMAN 13 January 2016 11: 23
      +3
      The pug (people) barks at the elephant (deputy body), well. Well.
      1. KBR109
        KBR109 13 January 2016 13: 01
        +3
        Do not forget that the number of police and explosives is almost 1.5 times higher than the armed forces. We are clearly reminded where the most dangerous enemy for the country is concentrated.
    6. bandabas
      bandabas 13 January 2016 12: 57
      0
      Why shoot? Complete confiscation of everything with a loss in civil rights - and to Kolyma. To fresh air. Benefit the Fatherland (Homeland until the 90s).
      1. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 13 January 2016 14: 53
        -1
        Who then will go to the deputies, no one is hunting for Kolyma. Is that natives from this very Kolyma
    7. siberalt
      siberalt 13 January 2016 14: 51
      -1
      Those left over to the funeral of their brothers from the budget will raise everything! belay
  3. pv1005
    pv1005 13 January 2016 06: 30
    21
    Unfortunately, the labor code does not apply to the servants of the people. And then it's time for half of the State Duma to dismiss for absenteeism.
    1. inkass_98
      inkass_98 13 January 2016 06: 42
      +8
      And to receive ministerial salaries - is the TC distributed?
      If the body has never been in meetings, how can it represent voters? Here, our false government has again blunted with the blocking of amendments. Or do they all imagine themselves in the role of future deputies?
    2. Boos
      Boos 13 January 2016 08: 39
      0
      To begin with, they need to be banned from thinking ...
    3. shasherin.pavel
      shasherin.pavel 13 January 2016 10: 19
      0
      "Only as before, the" servants of the people "live better than the people!" KVN is not Zhirinovsky, but it is a pity that he is not taken to the jury.
  4. evgeny1979
    evgeny1979 13 January 2016 06: 31
    +4
    Better to skip, otherwise they will again invent various unnecessary dicks!
  5. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 13 January 2016 06: 40
    10
    This is not a thought, it’s just parasites, at the expense of the budget and the people who are stuffing their feeds. They therefore do not appear at meetings because they don’t want to make decisions and laws that can improve the economic development of the country. All their activity comes down to running around shops and places of rest, and it’s a pity that deputies cannot be automatically deprived of immunity or dismissed from the Duma.
  6. Massik
    Massik 13 January 2016 06: 42
    +3
    This does not need to be sniffed, This has to be taught ...
    And so it goes comrades.

    To be honest, no agents of influence are needed, for sowing various anti-state grains, a dozen of such articles and grains will grow on their own in the minds of citizens. It’s not bitter to realize the fact itself, but that no one is fighting this and the government is in every way preventing the struggle.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 13 January 2016 06: 55
      +8
      Quote: Marssik

      To be honest, no agents of influence are needed, for sowing various anti-state grains, a dozen of such articles and grains will grow on their own in the minds of citizens.

      There were already hundreds of such articles, but people have brains fortunately.
      Quote: Marssik
      and the government impedes the struggle in every way.

      Is it the government's fault that the deputies lost their conscience?
      1. Darkoff
        Darkoff 13 January 2016 07: 25
        -8
        Support!
        deputies are elected by the people, and this is precisely what can not allow "to review the election results."

        And it is right. And, if I voted for someone, I don’t want anyone else to have the right to take away from my chosen one.
        Whom we choose, he rules.
        1. Corsair0304
          Corsair0304 13 January 2016 07: 46
          +6
          Quote: DarkOFF
          if I voted for someone, I don’t want anyone else to have the right to take away from my chosen one.


          If your chosen one has voted and conscientiously fulfills campaign promises and is actively involved in legislative activity, then yes, of course.
          And if the chosen one promised, and then "stupidly threw it" without appearing at the workplace and at the same time receiving 400 sput a month .. - this has nothing to do in the Duma, because he does not represent anyone's interests except his own and does not express the will of the people who elected him ...
          1. Darkoff
            Darkoff 13 January 2016 08: 45
            -2
            Quote: Corsair0304
            Quote: DarkOFF
            if I voted for someone, I don’t want anyone else to have the right to take away the mandate from my chosen one.


            If your chosen one has voted and conscientiously fulfills campaign promises and is actively involved in legislative activity, then yes, of course.
            And if the chosen one promised, and then "stupidly threw it" without appearing at the workplace and at the same time receiving 400 sput a month .. - this has nothing to do in the Duma, because he does not represent anyone's interests except his own and does not express the will of the people who elected him ...

            "And who are the judges?"
            Only I, the voter, have the right to issue a verdict on the degree of satisfaction of my hopes by the chosen one. And I will endure it in the elections.
            Well, I'm not saying that they should not be punished. It is necessary to fine, deprive of privileges, etc., but you can deprive the mandate only for specific crimes, on the recommendation of law enforcement agencies, on good grounds and after the vote by the entire Duma.
            If you create such a body, which in its own way can influence the composition of a popularly elected parliament, this will be a serious step either to anarchy or to totalitarianism.
            1. Corsair0304
              Corsair0304 13 January 2016 13: 57
              +2
              Quote: DarkOFF
              "And who are the judges?"
              Only I, the voter, have the right to issue a verdict on the degree of satisfaction of my hopes by the chosen one

              How, then, to act in the case when the people elect Ivanov (Obeshalkin), and the latter within the faction hands over his mandate to Petrov and calmly washing his hands counts the money spent: "promised, passed, washed away."
              And the faction makes a helpless gesture about this: they say "the current legislation allows such castling, but what Ivanov promised does not apply to Petrov - he did not promise." On top of that, Petrov does not appear in the Duma either - does he need it? He has his own business ..
            2. siberalt
              siberalt 13 January 2016 14: 58
              +1
              For this, it is a democracy with a variety of Maidan. So it turns out that Russia needs a tsar who can cut heads for the boyars. Or communism somewhere or something. laughing
            3. Massik
              Massik 13 January 2016 22: 25
              +1
              Quote: Alexander Romanov

              There were already hundreds of such articles, but people have brains fortunately.
              That is, the brains, they just hint at the mess, what to do if the Russian person is the most patient in the world ...
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Is it the government's fault that the deputies lost their conscience?
              Um, did I miss something? How do they get into the government?
              Quote: DarkOFF

              Only I, the voter, have the right to issue a verdict on the degree of satisfaction of my hopes by the chosen one. And I will endure it in the elections.
              Well, I'm not saying that they should not be punished. It is necessary to fine, deprive of privileges, etc., but you can deprive the mandate only for specific crimes, on the recommendation of law enforcement agencies, on good grounds and after the vote by the entire Duma.
              If you create such a body, which in its own way can influence the composition of a popularly elected parliament, this will be a serious step either to anarchy or to totalitarianism.
              Tell me, with what fright does the deputy have to have some sort of mandate? I remember everyone is equal before the law, isn't it? Why is it that worker Ivan Petrov, having stolen a bag of potatoes, should be in jail, and deputy Vasya Sidorov, having done the same, can hide behind a mandate ??? Is he God's chosen?
        2. Senior manager
          Senior manager 13 January 2016 09: 18
          +5
          DarkOFF. And this is wrong, laws and regulations are written in such a way that the people do not have the REAL ability to call their chosen one to order. I believe that the reform of the legislators is overdue. To begin with, it is necessary to reduce the length of stay in deputies, it is undemocratic, as the President does not have the right to rule a post for life, and deputies - please.
  7. parusnik
    parusnik 13 January 2016 06: 43
    12
    But under a bad "totalitarian" regime ... a deputy could be recalled by voters ... and they worked more on the ground ..
    1. Cap.Morgan
      Cap.Morgan 13 January 2016 08: 53
      -2
      Of course. The choice of candidates was especially wide. One of one is the representative of the indestructible bloc of communists and non-partisans. There was not a single decision of the Supreme Council that would not have been adopted by a 100% vote.
    2. shasherin.pavel
      shasherin.pavel 13 January 2016 10: 26
      +4
      In fact, under the "totalitarian" regime, the deputies (senators) of the government worked on the ground, remember the deputy of the pilot of the "catalina" near Pikul in the "Requiem for the PQ-17 caravan", which the deputy's badge showed to the foreign captain on an island in the Arctic Ocean?
  8. Nikolay K
    Nikolay K 13 January 2016 06: 45
    21
    You will laugh, but most of the laws issued by our State Duma over the past few years were adopted with gross violation, because our legislation does not provide for voting for oneself and a "comrade" and, of course, no one issues any powers of attorney to vote. Our laws are simply illegitimate. Why is this happening? Because this suits the current government. We do not have PEOPLE'S deputies, but there are people who press the buttons, and even then from time to time, but endowed with immunity. In fact, the entire party political system in the country is a fiction and voting is a vivid example of this.
    1. pv1005
      pv1005 13 January 2016 06: 53
      +4
      Quote: Nikolai K
      You will laugh, but most of the laws issued by our State Duma over the past few years were adopted with gross violation, because our legislation does not provide for voting for oneself and a "comrade" and, of course, no one issues any powers of attorney to vote. Our laws are simply illegitimate. Why is this happening? Because this suits the current government. We do not have PEOPLE'S deputies, but there are people who press the buttons, and even then from time to time, but endowed with immunity. In fact, the entire party political system in the country is a fiction and voting is a vivid example of this.

      The buttons should be pressed through fingerprint identification of the voter, otherwise the voting equipment should be blocked. I hope no one will delegate his finger apart from his beloved.
      1. Corsair0304
        Corsair0304 13 January 2016 08: 19
        +2
        in the Chelyabinsk region there is a chain of stores selling draft drinks "Pivstation" (do not consider it an advertisement) and so there instead of discount cards they just use the terminals that read the thumbprint))) Because sometimes customers cannot clearly answer where there is such a card, but finger - always with you.
      2. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 13 January 2016 09: 08
        +2
        To think up a system of identification, in modern times, is a simple matter. Nobody just needs it. Everything has already been decided in advance, because the vote is so formal that the deputies can not even attend meetings. Guided democracy in action.
  9. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 13 January 2016 06: 47
    11
    Deputies go to power for money, because these two concepts are always inextricably linked. Money gives entrance to power, power allows you to make money. The electorate can be promised anything, it is not necessary to fulfill. Endure, not the first time.
    And it is necessary to mount presence sensors in deputy seats so that the voting panel turns on a couple of minutes after landing. Immediately the problem of multi-job users will disappear. That's just, I'm afraid the government will not find the money for this. The crisis, however.
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 13 January 2016 07: 19
      +2
      Quote: Mikhail M
      And it is necessary to mount presence sensors in deputy seats so that the voting panel turns on a couple of minutes after landing.

      The very next day, a heavy briefcase will appear in the armchair imitating the presence of the chosen one, and the duty jacket on the back of the armchair will also appear ...
      1. B.T.V.
        B.T.V. 13 January 2016 07: 45
        +5
        Quote: Tatar 174
        The very next day, a heavy briefcase will appear in the armchair imitating the presence of the chosen one, and the duty jacket on the back of the armchair will also appear ...


        There is an anecdote on this topic from the late USSR: "in one design bureau, they decided to check the efficiency of the departments with the help of the latest equipment. The equipment was installed, set up. In one department, the working people plowed all day without raising their heads, and in the other, who just jumped on the spot At the end of the working day, the results are summed up: the department that worked - low indicators, the department where they did not do anything all day - the indicators go off scale, and then the cleaning lady, Aunt Glasha, comes into the room of the "shock workers" , comes up to the basket with garbage and says: "Again these parasites were beating the whole day!" The bosses to her: "Aunt Glasha, how did you determine ?!" "And what is there to determine when the waste basket is empty ?!"
      2. lexx2038
        lexx2038 13 January 2016 07: 56
        -1
        Quote: Tartar 174
        Quote: Mikhail M
        And it is necessary to mount presence sensors in deputy seats so that the voting panel turns on a couple of minutes after landing.

        The very next day, a heavy briefcase will appear in the armchair imitating the presence of the chosen one, and the duty jacket on the back of the armchair will also appear ...

        The sensor can be put more cunningly - if no one has been in the chair for an hour, then the deputy is absent, with all that it implies ... laughing
    2. Dragon-y
      Dragon-y 13 January 2016 07: 31
      0
      Dumbbells will be brought in pockets and laid on chairs ... :)
    3. Kahlan amnell
      Kahlan amnell 13 January 2016 07: 43
      +7
      Quote: Mikhail M
      And it is necessary to mount presence sensors in deputy seats so that the voting panel turns on a couple of minutes after landing.

      All this is nonsense and nonsense! Neither fingerprint voting buttons nor chairs with weight sensors will fix the matter. Just as the "people's" deputies were the hands of oligarchic capital and, in essence, just parasites on the body of the country, they will remain. All these protracted games of democracy are disastrous for the country.
      Correct the situation can only real mechanisms guaranteeing personal responsibility deputy for the results of his work.
      But such funds, alas, no longer exist. So it turns out that the State Duma, for the most part, consists of incompetent and lazy "servants of the people" who come to life only when it is necessary to work out their deputies and benefits, in favor of their true masters.
      Isn't it time to end the games of "democracy"?
      1. Corsair0304
        Corsair0304 13 January 2016 08: 24
        +4
        Quote: Kahlan Amnell
        Isn't it time to end the games of "democracy"?


        It is time.
        "At the heart of democracy, first of all, not freedom (as many think), but respect. Respect for a person, for the people, for their understanding of life, for their past, for customs, the system of thinking. (B. Okudzhava)"
      2. shasherin.pavel
        shasherin.pavel 13 January 2016 10: 33
        +1
        Quote: Kahlan Amnell
        But such funds, alas, no longer exist.

        I do not agree !!!! categorically!!! there is such a tool! the deputy should receive his salary as in the last place of work plus travel allowance, but only on tickets to his district.
        1. Kahlan amnell
          Kahlan amnell 13 January 2016 10: 51
          +1
          Quote: shasherin.pavel
          I do not agree !!!! categorically!!! there is such a tool! the deputy should receive his salary as in the last place of work plus travel allowance, but only on tickets to his district.

          Should. But the difference between "should" and see for yourself.
  10. Alexander S.
    Alexander S. 13 January 2016 06: 52
    0
    and the people go and vote for these ....
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 13 January 2016 06: 56
      +3
      Quote: Alexander S.
      and the people go and vote for these ....

      vote for others, it will be the same.
      By the way, where is the Communist Party, that is a lot of empty seats.
      1. My address
        My address 13 January 2016 07: 55
        16
        Hello, Alexander.

        No, it won't be the same. If United Russia receives less than 40% in the fall, the Kremlin will understand that the people do not like the economy at all (as well as the work of the judicial system, and other "delights" of irresponsibility for the entrusted work of those who are loyal to Putin) and serious organizational conclusions will be drawn. And it will not be good, despite the assurances of Medvedev and Putin. But if EP again occupies more than half of the seats, the calm will continue and the matter will end badly.

        It is useful to remember that the irresponsible so-called Russia brought Russia to the disgrace of 1917, elite, but not the Bolsheviks,

        Everyone in the country should understand that a higher responsibility falls on their shoulders from a higher position.

        And the author of the article is about as a good doctor warning:
        - My dear! Stop getting drunk from the belly with pineapples and grouse, and liter whiskey in liters! Otherwise you in oncology will be cut a lot of things from the gastrointestinal tract.
        1. atalef
          atalef 13 January 2016 08: 02
          +8
          Quote: My address
          No, it won't be the same. If the United Russia receives less than 40% in the fall, the Kremlin will understand that the people do not like the affairs of the economy at all (as well as the work of the judicial system, and other "delights" of irresponsibility for the task entrusted to those who are loyal to Putin) and serious organizational conclusions will be drawn

          Well, NF is already at the ready.
          Quote: My address
          . But if again EP takes up more than half of the seats, then calm will continue and things will end badly.

          What's the difference.
          All are absolutely tame and well-fed, the opposition is not.
          There is no one to criticize WWP.
          Medvedev whipping boy.
          The ratings are off the charts.
          What kind of course change can you talk about?
          everyone likes everything. the main thing is not to rock the boat - I disagree with something --- the liberalist and the 5th column.
          Quote: My address
          It is useful to remember that the irresponsible so-called Russia brought Russia to the disgrace of 1917, elite, but not the Bolsheviks,

          ?????
          1. My address
            My address 13 January 2016 08: 48
            +6
            Welcome back to the front line!

            Alexander, for your questions:
            In 60-s, someone Martynenko taught the history of the CPSU in Sverdlovsk UPI. The most interesting uncle, I tell you! Because of the heap of merit, he was tolerated at the pulpit even under Khrushchev, when he was really neat, but declared that Stalin was hanged by something that was not in nature. So Martynenko walked away from the Short Course and said that until the summer of 1917 the Bolsheviks were in tenth roles, the more serious parties were the Social Revolutionaries, the Mensheviks, the Bundists and I do not remember who else, not to mention the bourgeois parties. It was later, for ideological reasons, began to declare that the Bolsheviks took an active part in the February events. Yes, and Spartacus in ancient Rome was the Commissioner lol ,

            And about liberasta and the fifth column is interesting. Already on many sites it began to sound that if you do not support Putin unconditionally, then the enemy. Do you think these de Bilny foolish ideas?

            hi
          2. goose
            goose 13 January 2016 09: 58
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            ?????

            Kerensky and the Provisional Government overthrew the king and led the country to a second revolution.
          3. sherp2015
            sherp2015 13 January 2016 10: 01
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            atalef (7) Today, 08:02 ↑
            Quote: My address
            No, it won't be the same. If the United Russia receives less than 40% in the fall, the Kremlin will understand that the people do not like the affairs of the economy at all (as well as the work of the judicial system, and other "delights" of irresponsibility for the task entrusted to those who are loyal to Putin) and serious organizational conclusions will be drawn
            Well, NF is already at the ready.
            Quote: My address
            . But if again EP takes up more than half of the seats, then calm will continue and things will end badly.
            What's the difference.
            All are absolutely tame and well-fed, the opposition is not.
            There is no one to criticize WWP.
            Medvedev whipping boy.
            The ratings are off the charts.
            What kind of course change can you talk about?
            everyone likes everything. the main thing is not to rock the boat - I disagree with something --- the liberalist and the 5th column.


            Wow!
            For the first time I agree with Ataleff ... +
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 13 January 2016 11: 31
          -1
          Quote: My address
          Hello, Alexander.

          Hi hi
          Quote: My address

          It is useful to remember that it was the irresponsible so-called “Russia” that brought Russia to the outrages of 1917. elite but not the Bolsheviks

          And who was swinging the country from the inside?
          1. Was mammoth
            Was mammoth 13 January 2016 14: 19
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And who was swinging the country from the inside?

            King.
          2. IS-80
            IS-80 13 January 2016 15: 16
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And who was swinging the country from the inside?

            Yeah, there were no problems in the country, milk rivers flowed in the jelly banks. And then the evil Bolsheviks came and spoiled the whole gingerbread picture. laughing
      2. Was mammoth
        Was mammoth 13 January 2016 14: 52
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        By the way, where is the Communist Party, that is a lot of empty seats.

        The main thing is to find deputies from the EP.
      3. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 13 January 2016 15: 11
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        By the way, where is the Communist Party, that is a lot of empty seats.

        All sit on the site, discuss)))
  11. samarin1969
    samarin1969 13 January 2016 07: 04
    +2
    450 bums and showmen - an expensive tribute to the European tradition of "separation of powers".
    ... Elect the Guarantor + the Constitutional Court: both the economy and no one will moan about "bad laws", always impersonal "corrupt officials".
    1. atalef
      atalef 13 January 2016 08: 04
      +7
      Quote: samarin1969
      Elect the Guarantor + Constitutional Court:

      But why the court?
      Is the guarantor the same?
      maybe just a king?
      it's easier.
      and in general, I have always been interested. why GDP --- Guarantor?
      the guarantor in general then what?
      1. Fox
        Fox 13 January 2016 10: 03
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        the guarantor in general then what?

        it went with EBN ... he pushed the speech (drunk, as usual) ... well, he charged: I, the guarantor, says!
      2. goblin xnumx
        goblin xnumx 13 January 2016 10: 13
        +2
        someone's guarantor let's say so
  12. Flat5160
    Flat5160 13 January 2016 07: 08
    +7
    Inviolable. Looking at them I just want to say: "Do not pretend to be the standard of a citizen of Russia!" Most of them (probably a good half) are just leeches on the body of the country, or sticky like fish.
  13. gla172
    gla172 13 January 2016 07: 10
    +6
    I need to work 4 years to get their monthly salary .....
  14. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 13 January 2016 07: 11
    +4
    Lenin also said that the State Apparatus should be cleaned.
    1. Cap.Morgan
      Cap.Morgan 13 January 2016 08: 58
      -1
      He could say that. He had Dzerzhinsky, and he has a Mauser.
      Under Lenin, however, the state apparatus increased by 10 times, to 2 million, and there was also a party apparatus
      1. Shadowcat
        Shadowcat 13 January 2016 09: 58
        0
        The CPSU (b) was also cleansed under Stalin (speaking the party meant the state apparatus. Ugh, vice versa), as he said "without periodic cleansing from shaky elements, the party cannot strengthen."
        And with a population of 200 million for the year 1940, 2 million state machinery is not even enough.
  15. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 13 January 2016 07: 16
    +2
    Duma must think, and for this it’s not necessary to sit in the Duma, half of them have no brains at all, the other thinks they are.
    On kitsch !!!
  16. Evgtan
    Evgtan 13 January 2016 07: 16
    11
    Should I write such articles when the jokes have already written about everything?

    Do you have a tap flowing? Burned iron? The computer does not work? “Deputy for an hour” - doesn’t fix anything, proves that everything is fine with you and leaves you without money.

    - The salary of the staff of the State Duma will be doubled, and pensions will be indexed only by four percent!
    - Tell me, what's more than two or four?
    - Of course, four more than two, twice!
    - It turns out that pensioners will receive twice as much!

    And the speaker said to the People’s Deputies:
    - Who among you is without sin - let him be the first to vote for the abolition of immunity!

    The salaries of Duma deputies increased again. This is the third such case in the past year and a half. Lawmakers cannot yet explain the nature of this mystery.
  17. Glock
    Glock 13 January 2016 07: 22
    +8
    It is a pity that the deputies forgot that they are primarily servants of the people !!!
    The question is why it happened and who is to blame ???
    1. walrus-a
      walrus-a 13 January 2016 14: 36
      +2
      The deputy is not a "servant", he has long been a "master"!
  18. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 13 January 2016 07: 31
    +5
    In our country, each new Duma starts with one thing - the question of the deputy's salary is naturally upward. Then the work routine begins - truancy, scandals, the adoption of bad laws, etc. At the expense of taxpayers, "servants of the people" carry out their "difficult" service.
  19. Neophyte
    Neophyte 13 January 2016 08: 03
    +3
    High-wage parasites are the dream of every student!
  20. Was mammoth
    Was mammoth 13 January 2016 08: 13
    +9
    The deputies (and it so happened that all the authors of amendments to the federal law represent the LDPR faction) Svintsov, Lebedev, Kalyuzhny, Nilov and Zolochevsky proposed punishing those parliamentarians who systematically miss meetings, ignore their official duties and actually disrupt legislative work.
    Molotsy! Last on the website of the State Duma:
    10:57:33 The law was adopted, as it were, 241 deputies (FOR -ER, the rest voted on it);
    11:02:41 the law has not been adopted, there is no quorum, like 90 deputies (ZA-KPRF, the rest did not vote);
    11:08:17 the law is not adopted, there is no quorum, as it were 127; (ZA-KPRF-81; LDPR-45)
    11:09:47 the law is adopted, as it were 240; (ZA-240 EP, AGAINST -88 Communist Party, SP-2 Chela, LDPR is not in full force).
    http://www.duma.gov.ru/
    This theater of the absurd! It is difficult to choose a different definition ... It turns out that the government issues indulgences to crooks who are elected by the people and do not fulfill their duties? Strangeness, which is difficult to explain by a desire for legality ...
    No weirdness. Look at the website of the State Duma. What laws, how and with what speed are voted.
    I am not delighted with the "opposition", but as long as the EP monopolist, nothing will change.
    PS With discipline cool in the State Duma, "their" laws in the United Russia (from the government) always gain a quorum. With a conscience problem. Therefore, I urge you to go to the elections and before them, at least on the website of the State Duma, see who, for, what votes.
    1. goblin xnumx
      goblin xnumx 13 January 2016 10: 18
      +1
      of course you can walk, or maybe someone needs it, so that you can stretch your legs, breathe air :): - but about the fact that you vote something, you don’t even think, it just breathes the air of air, talk to people, the day off :)
      1. Was mammoth
        Was mammoth 13 January 2016 14: 46
        +1
        Quote: Leshy74
        you can walk of course -....


        Necessary.
        The people have only two ways to influence the government, participating in the political life of the country:
        1. Through elections, parties, actions of support or protest, strikes ....
        2. Through the riot.
        In any other case, for the authorities, the people are "cattle".
        PS conversation with a neighbor:
        - If not a secret, for whom did you vote?
        - For EP.
        - Why not?
        - They will win anyway.
        1. PHANTOM-AS
          PHANTOM-AS 13 January 2016 23: 41
          +1
          Quote: There was a mammoth
          - If not a secret, for whom did you vote?
          - For EP.
          - Why not?
          - They will win anyway.

          disgusting however
  21. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 13 January 2016 08: 38
    +3
    Formally, the deputies are elected by the people.
    But is it really?
    Take the party. In each party there are people who are capable and ready to serve the country, but not all.
    Many are, if not the business itself, then they are promoted by big business to protect their interests. Do the people want such deputies? No, but there is an election campaign, where any nominated candidate from the devil with horns is represented by a defender angel. In this case, it is not easy for the voter to find his way. All "independent" media have their own owners, as a result, inconvenient ones are poured with compromising material like a bucket, others are made victims of criminals. But that's not all.
    Here I take the newsletter, there is a party and a list. In this list I see the name of the person I know, and I know that this person is worthy of a mandate in his worldview, competence and ability. I put a tick. The party is passing, but this person is not in the deputies. But people like the same Ponomarev become deputies. There are other options. Put a famous person on the list, say an athlete. Sport should be presented in the State Duma, people vote. But it turns out that this person had his own professional plans, and another person gets the mandate.
    This is how crooks come to power, who receive the support of a state person, not fulfilling their duties, but who are hiding behind a mandate.
    Did the people choose these crooks? No, I didn’t choose, I didn’t vote.
    All claims to the electoral system.
    When, after the annexation of Crimea, sanctions were imposed, i.e. it became clear that the US State Department knows all the details of the decision-making mechanism of the State Duma of the Russian Federation - where did the traitors come from?
    I will answer: deputies representing the interests of other states in the State Duma are supplied by the electoral system itself
    To be honest, the state oversees such important issues as elections. So they must not allow those who serve the interests of other states into power. And don’t talk about democracy, people don’t need traitors, at least the eyes and ears of the State Department in the State Duma.
  22. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 13 January 2016 08: 45
    +2
    One can talk endlessly about deputies as well as corruption. But nothing will change until a strong-willed leader like Stalin arrives and disperses all this Caudle in sunny Magadan or evening Vorkuta.
    But here, too, there is a double-edged sword: ".... applause from the delegates, turning into a standing ovation ...", laws are adopted with a 100% vote, and so on.
    1. gla172
      gla172 13 January 2016 08: 59
      +5
      I completely agree.....
    2. Cap.Morgan
      Cap.Morgan 13 January 2016 09: 02
      -1
      New Stalin will not stop there. The media, literature and cinema will follow, and ordinary citizens will be drawn into dull series of columns, tinkling with shackles.
    3. goose
      goose 13 January 2016 10: 07
      0
      Quote: Corsair0304
      But here, too, there is a double-edged sword: ".... applause from the delegates, turning into a standing ovation ...", laws are adopted with a 100% vote, and so on.

      The main stick in the problem of the succession of power, as a rule, after the rule of a charismatic dictator, the next ruler is a real failure.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. Mihail55
    Mihail55 13 January 2016 09: 03
    +2
    The budget for 2016 was adjusted by 10%, but is it time for the Duma too ... to adjust?
  25. Begemot
    Begemot 13 January 2016 09: 05
    +7
    If I could, would put 100 pluses to the article, it's time to deal with this pack. Laws are an instrument of government. For such a many-sided, multinational, much confessional, vast territory from glaciers to subtropics of the country, laws should be verified and polished to a shine. And these villains do not even go to work, I am sure that they did not read most of the laws adopted. What, besides rotten slops, can such a thought issue? I have been asking for a long time: who is the employer of the deputies? Why can anyone be asked for quality of work and discipline, but there is no demand for deputies? They generally do not answer to anyone! It is not surprising that not only experts, but ordinary citizens, when confronted with our legislation, pronounce only two phrases: 1. Rave! 2. Complete nonsense! But the law is a concentrated view of the people about good and evil, about truth and justice.
  26. art 230
    art 230 13 January 2016 09: 06
    0
    and according to our legislation, it is possible, having collected a certain number of signatures, to "force" to adopt a law on deprivation of mandate for absenteeism?
  27. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 13 January 2016 09: 17
    +7
    I had to somehow get into the office of a party preparing to take part in the municipal elections of deputies. The party is not in the first roles, but sometimes flickers. Portrait of a party member and candidate. These are people who were not "lucky" for some reason to get into the leading party. The composition is variegated. Recorded oppositionists, filmed corrupt officials and their children, businessmen covering up their scams with a deputy mandate, as well as ambitious adventurers (usually newcomers) in the manner of Khlestakov. The purpose of the nomination is to earn "credibility" with the local elite. Look for opportunities, prepare the ground. Assign with the right people, and then sit down in a warm place. Delegation is seen as an intermediate stage, unpleasant and tedious, due to annoying petitioners. Oil painting!
  28. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 13 January 2016 09: 52
    +7
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    This government is guilty that deputies lost their conscience


    Who? Or is the king good, the boyars bad?
  29. NOTaFED
    NOTaFED 13 January 2016 09: 59
    +4
    Dima-iPhone-nolpromille also gathered for the elections ... Freak-asshole.
  30. Million
    Million 13 January 2016 10: 00
    +5
    If you don’t attend meetings, then nobody needs it. The main thing is to have a deputy mandate
  31. Belousov
    Belousov 13 January 2016 11: 34
    +1
    Well, if there was real responsibility for what they accept there, then they would really sit and read before pressing the buttons. And so - complete profanity.
    The wording "the cabinet of ministers rejected the amendments, stating that the deputies are elected by the people, and this is what cannot allow" revising the election results "" complete garbage. To deprive a mandate for absence from the workplace equate to a change in the will of voters? Well, in general, as usual, bees against honey, the king is good, these are bad boyars, and so on along the knurled ...
  32. Leader
    Leader 13 January 2016 11: 35
    +3
    The State Duma is an absolutely unnecessary organ in our country.
    This is a bunch of thief and moral freaks. The political ones are simple ... tutki, lobbying for any idea, even murderous for Russia, for money - these are deputies offering to bring 40 million migrants to our country!
    I don’t go to the polls, I despise deputies.
  33. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 13 January 2016 11: 44
    +3
    "Parliament is not a place for discussion" BV Gryzlov. If there are no discussions, then all that remains is to stick the cards and press the "for" button, and the trained monkey will cope with this. I would have washed away, too, there are more interesting things to do.
  34. sds87
    sds87 13 January 2016 11: 47
    +4
    Everyone wants a deputy -
    Everyone wants to live richly
    Everyone wants a reap button
    And do not answer for anything.
    (C) Mine.
    Everything was rotted from above specifically. A battered deck of friends cards at the top. And businessmen in the Duma, thinking only of their interests. The result is a mess in the country. The people in the pen.
  35. Tankist_1980
    Tankist_1980 13 January 2016 12: 20
    +5
    Why does our country need so many deputies? To Malakhov go to the show? From each region one at a time. And the Federation Council is not needed. The son asked why he was, and I don’t know what to say))) At many enterprises, the reduction of deputies and cut ...
    1. walrus-a
      walrus-a 13 January 2016 14: 24
      +2
      Very good suggestion. It’s a pity that it will not work ...
  36. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 13 January 2016 12: 26
    +4
    As one civil servant who extorted a bribe once said to me: "I did not go to this position for so long to live honestly"
  37. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 13 January 2016 12: 56
    0
    The first rule of the citizen: "Never ask your state questions that it does not like. Because you may not like the answers."
  38. fa2998
    fa2998 13 January 2016 13: 19
    +1
    Quote: Burmeister
    THEREFORE I propose to collectively write a petition to the PRESIDENT so that this disgrace stops

    Well, how little children! The President knows everything, the main thing is that the "necessary" laws are being adopted! And they will find quite a few good reasons for the absence, and for voting "for others" they will say that they made a general decision at a faction meeting. And he gave a voting card voluntarily, to his party member. laughing hi
  39. walrus-a
    walrus-a 13 January 2016 14: 22
    +1
    In the theater of the absurdity, nothing should be surprised ...
  40. red rocket
    red rocket 13 January 2016 14: 37
    +1
    never these parasites will think about the people, they think how to do more privileges for themselves.
  41. Starik72
    Starik72 13 January 2016 14: 40
    +1
    I read the article and remembered the old joke. The Armenian radio was asked the question: What is the name of a woman surrendering in the PARADE entrance? The Armenian radio thought, thought and cannot answer. Then IT turned to all the radio, everyone shrugs, they don’t know, one Belarusian radio only smirks. Then the Armenian radio turned to the Belarusian, help me out, tell me. Belarusian radio says: oh you You can’t answer a simple question, but it’s called simply JUST. This is why, yes because, IT WORKS there, and THE OTHERS outside the front door DO NOT WORK. So make a conclusion.
  42. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 13 January 2016 15: 50
    0
    Take the panorama of the conference room, which shows the scoreboard for voting with the results - and count the heads in the room.

    Absenteeism, by the way, as far as is known, is not paid anywhere. Especially those who have never appeared at a meeting. Do not pay, that's all. Why did they sit less in the USSR Armed Forces, and the turnout was greater (according to the results of the vote, 100% in general). Surely pluralism has leaked into this question - I want to go, I want to - I do not go.
  43. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 13 January 2016 17: 40
    +1
    The deputies do not have enough time to spend their salaries, and therefore they skip.
  44. Egevich
    Egevich 13 January 2016 18: 57
    +1
    profanity and once again profanity and imitation of higher nervous activity ... The Duma is a screen for real puppeteers ... we can say dust in the eyes, like we have democracy ... yeah ... yes ... you still tell me about the Immaculate Conception tell me ...
  45. tank64rus
    tank64rus 13 January 2016 19: 21
    +2
    For absenteeism, deputies in the tsarist Duma were subject to a heavy fine of about 200 rubles. which at that time was very significant. Who is now sitting in the Duma here as a deceased is better to say, and so everything is known. Starting with the traitor Ponomarev. Everyone knows how they get there. In general, one of the politicians of our time said: "Our Duma is the place where rich people take care of the interests of very rich people." All. The curtain.
  46. Cobra77
    Cobra77 13 January 2016 19: 30
    +2
    Well, let's just say honestly that the presence or absence of deputies in the workplace does not affect the work of the State Duma. From the word at all. Adoption or non-adoption of laws does not occur at voting or readings. They are discussed and accepted in other rooms. The State Duma simply officially approves them and nothing more. It’s just a dance figure, such a legal one, which has no relation to decision-making.
  47. kirgudu
    kirgudu 14 January 2016 14: 48
    0
    Yes, everything is normal. Deputies pass laws which palm off the higher leadership, the higher leadership covers the quasi-State Duma. And everyone pretends that they are working for the good of Russia and without them everything will come down.

    And we pay for all this ...
  48. Gippo
    Gippo 15 January 2016 20: 20
    +1
    Ugh on them.
    Ugh on them again.
  49. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 15 January 2016 23: 42
    +1
    Shame, just shame, no words ...
    Exit four.
    Lack of absenteeism from the salary.
    Any vote only with all deputies.
    Departure to the regions all at once.
    One word from Putin. Once he has organized "manual control", let him manage himself.
  50. olf
    olf 16 January 2016 00: 47
    0
    They put parasites on their necks and are taking them to a brighter future. Isn’t it time to throw off a gang of hollow breeds and a thief from the neck.