Day of Military Glory of Russia - Victory Day of the Russian squadron at Cape Sinop

29
Day of Military Glory of Russia - Victory Day of the Russian squadron at Cape Sinop

"Truly Russian courage" of the Black Sea sailors in the Battle of Sinop

18 (30) November 1853, the Battle of Sinop took place, in which the Russian Black Sea Fleet, commanded by Admiral Pavel Stepanovich Nakhimov, destroyed the Turkish fleet for several hours. This was the first major battle of the Crimean War.

It should be noted that the situation in the Black Sea basin has become significantly complicated since May 1853, when there was a break in diplomatic relations between Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Russian forces were brought into the Danube principalities (Moldavia and Wallachia), the Anglo-French fleet arrived at the Dardanelles. In late September, Port demanded that St. Petersburg withdraw its troops from the territories of the Danube principalities, but before the end of the term of the ultimatum, it declared war on the Russian Empire. The Turks were confident in their abilities, since France and Britain stood behind them.

October 11 (23), the Russian Danube detachment flotilla was shelled from the side of Isakcha fortress. On the night of the 16th, Turkish forces attacked the Russian garrison of the post of St. Nicholas on the Black Sea coast, it was located between Poti and Batum. On October 21, Turkish forces crossed the Danube and created a bridgehead for a strike against the Russian army. So began the next Russian-Turkish war.

Black Sea

In the plans of the Turkish command, a large role was assigned to the Caucasus and the actions of the Turkish army in support of the Turkish fleet from the sea. In Batumi, 20, a thousand Turkish corps, and a large flotilla of coastal vessels (up to 250) were concentrated to transport troops by sea. They planned to land the troops in the area of ​​Sukhumi, Poti, Gagra, Sochi, Tuapse.

To cover the assault, a squadron of the best ships under the command of Vice-Admiral Osman-Pasha was formed, Rear Admiral Hussein Pasha became the second flagship. When the squadron was a British adviser - Captain A. Slade, in the Turkish fleet, he was promoted to rear admiral. The squadron consisted of 7 frigates and 5 corvettes. To increase its reconnaissance capabilities, she was given a detachment of steam-frigates from 3, under the command of Vice Admiral Mustafa Pasha. The Anglo-French fleet at this time passed from the Dardanelles to the Bosphorus.

From 5 to 6 in November 1853 of the year in 12 miles from Cape Pitsunda, the frigate “Flora” marching under the command of young captain-lieutenant Skorobogatov was attacked by three Turkish steamboat-frigates under the command of Admiral Mustafa Pasha. The battle went from 2 hours of the night to 9 hours of the morning, as a result, the Turkish squad was defeated and retreated. The Turkish command, along with the British, could not take advantage of the speed, strength, and armament. Although the Turkish steamboat frigates were large-caliber bombing guns, which could fire, being outside the reach of the Russian ship. The Russian captain showed cold-blooded reasoning and courage, and his team knowledge of his business. This was the only case in the marine storieswhen one sailing ship was able to defeat three steam.

Black Sea Fleet Actions

The squadron of Vice-Admiral Nakhimov (84-gun battleships "Empress Maria", "Chesma", "Rostislav") and a detachment of steamships under the command of the fleet chief of Vice-Admiral Vladimir Alekseevich Kornilov were sent by prince Menshikov to cruise to the shores Anatol Vladimir Alekseevich Kornilov to coast to the shores Anatol Vladimir Alekseevich Kornilov. reconnaissance and search of the Turkish naval forces.

After a week of searching in the western region of the Black Sea and at the Bosporus, Kornilov decided to return to Sevastopol. 5 (17) on November, the steamer-frigate "Vladimir" was holding the flag of Kornilov on it, and the commander of the ship was G. I. Butakov, in the area of ​​the Turkish port of Penderakli, the Turkish ship Pervaz-Bahri was spotted. There was the first in the history of the battle of steam ships. After a two-hour fight, the Turks lowered the flag. As a result of the march to the Bosporus, Kornilov found out that the Turks were preparing a squadron for the march, which should cover the landing in Sukhumi and Poti. He reported this to Nakhimov.

At that time, a squadron of Nakhimov was cruising off the coast of Anatolia, where the main maritime communications connecting Istanbul with Batum took place. For more than a month the Russian ships were in a campaign, which proceeded under conditions of severe autumn weather, constantly waiting for a meeting with the Turkish fleet and a possible attack by the British fleet. 3 November Nakhimov announced an order for the fleet, in which he reported that the Turkish fleet went to sea: "The enemy can not fulfill his intention otherwise, like passing by us or giving us a battle ... I hope to accept the battle with honor."

November 8 1853 squadron Nakhimov discovered an enemy squadron of 16 combat and auxiliary vessels on the roads of the Turkish port of Sinop. The Turkish squadron was armed with 476 guns, plus 44 guns on the coastal 6 batteries, they were equated to several ship guns, since they were more powerful. Nakhimov had three linear sailing ships with 252 guns, i.e., his forces were initially weaker than Turkish, but the Russian admiral decided to block the enemy in Sinop until reinforcements from Sevastopol arrived. Moreover, Nakhimov was ready to join the battle if the Turks go for a breakthrough. He wrote in one of the orders that if he met an enemy that exceeded the Russian squadron in strength, he would attack him, “being absolutely sure that each of us will do his own thing ...”.

The Turkish command, despite the superiority in strength, did not dare to join the battle or to break the blockade. A report on the blockade was sent to Istanbul, hoping for help from the Anglo-French forces, and the Russian forces were exaggerated three times.

November 16 (28) November, a squadron of Admiral Fyodor Mikhailovich Novosilsky arrived in Sinop, consisting of three 120-gun battleships (Paris, Grand Prince Constantine and Three Saints) and 2 frigates (44-gun Kagul and XI - gun "Kulevchi"). As a result, his strength, including the three ships, increased to 54 guns. Nakhimov decided to attack himself.



Nakhimov's plan

The idea of ​​Nakhimov, this great Russian naval commander, was imbued with determination and initiative. According to his plan, the ships in the ranks of two wake columns (the line of ships when following one after the other along the course line) were to break through to the enemy raid and attack the ships and batteries of the enemy. This system was supposed to reduce the time of passage of ships under the fire of an enemy squadron and land batteries. In addition, facilitated the deployment of the Russian squadron in order of battle when anchored. The frigates were in the rearguard, blocking possible attempts to escape the enemy ships.

The admiral has carefully developed the position of the squadron during the battle, gave clear instructions on the preparation for the battle, the location of each ship, its purpose. At the same time, the commander was confident of the high skill of the repaired commanders, ordinary sailors, and artillerymen, so there was no strict regulation. Nakhimov always encouraged personnel on the initiative, independence.

Battle

The ships sent the last call of Admiral P. S. Nakhimov: “Russia expects glorious feats from the Black Sea Fleet; it is up to us to live up to expectations. ” 18 (30) November 1853, 9.30 of the morning squadron headed for the Turkish raid. The flagship linear 84-gun ship "Empress Maria" headed the right column. At the head of the left was "Paris" under the flag of Rear Admiral F, M. Novosilsky (the commander of the battleship was V. I. Istomin).

Turkish ships were starboard at a minimum distance from the coast. Noticing the movement of the Russian squadron, the Turks began frantically preparing for battle. In 12 hours of 28 minutes of the day, 1-th shot from the 44-cannon flagship frigate "Aunni Allah" was fired from all Turkish ships and batteries. Russian ships came under heavy fire. The Turks hoped that when they came under heavy fire from the coastal and naval artillery, the Russian squadron would not be able to break through at close range and retreat.

But the Russian ships continued to confidently go to the Turkish squadron. Nakhimov, knowing the techniques of the Turkish commanders, foresaw that the enemy fire would be concentrated on the mast (this is a combination of the above-deck parts of the ship equipment), and not along the decks. Thus, the Turks wanted to bring a large number of Russian sailors at a time when they would remove the sails before setting the ships to anchor and break the controllability of the ships during movement. And so it happened, the Turkish cores blew the sails, broke yards, and ridges. But the sailors were at the bottom, Nakhimov ordered to anchor the ships without removing the sails.

The squadron’s flagship received the most damage; it received the main fire of the enemy, the flagship lost most of its mast. But, despite the damage (after the battle 60 was counted in the holes in the board), the Russian flagship continued to move and began to approach the Admiral frigate Aunni Allah. Approaching a distance of about 400 meters, the "Empress Maria" anchored, followed by other ships. The Russian squadron executed the first part of the plan - it broke through under the fire of the enemy on the Sinop raid.

The battle began between the two squadrons. Russian ships hit the enemy to 200 shells per minute. A great role was played by coordinated, clear actions of the Russian commanders. The Turks also now beat on the gun decks, and after several volleys they were shot.

“The Empress Maria” concentrated the fire on “Aunni Allah”, the Russian sailors skillfully acted under the fire not only of the enemy flagship, but also other ships, batteries, which supported their flagship frigate. Nakhimov noted the “personal courage and orderliness” of Lieutenants P. Prokofiev and D. Butakov. Half an hour later, the enemy frigate, unable to withstand Russian fire, rushed to the shore. The Turkish squadron has lost the main leadership and command center. After that, the Russian flagship concentrated fire on another Turkish frigate, the Fazli-Allah, which soon caught fire and also rushed ashore. After that, "Maria" began to fire on the battery number XXUMX.


Battleship "Empress Maria"

The linear 120 gun ship “Grand Duke Konstantin” (he was under the command of the captain of the 2 rank L. A. Ergomyshev), anchored, fired at the Navek-Bahri frigate (60 guns) and the battery No. XXNX. After 4 minutes of battle, the enemy frigate exploded - one of the Russian shells hit the gunpowder cellar. After that, "Constantine" concentrated fire on the frigate "Nesimi-Zefer" (20 cannons) and the corvette "Nedzhmi-Feshan" (60 cannons), both enemy ships were forced to throw ashore.

Linear 84-gun ship "Chesma" fought against two Turkish batteries that supported the left flank of the Turkish squadron - №4 and №3. With each volley of the ship, the destruction of the Turkish positions increased. Soon both batteries were put down.

The flagship of the second Russian column, and she opposed the right flank of the Turkish squadron - 120-gun "Paris" was fighting with the frigate "Damiad" (56 guns), the corvette "Guli-Sefid" (22 guns) and the central coastal battery - №5. After the corvette caught fire, and then exploded, when the fire reached the powder cellar, the efforts of the Russian commanders were concentrated on the frigate Damiad, he could not stand the strong fire, the crew chopped off the anchor cable and the ship dropped ashore. "Paris" opened fire on the 62-gun frigate "Nizamiye", Admiral Hussein Pasha was holding the flag on it (it was the most powerful frigate of the enemy fleet). Soon the frigate lost two masts - fok- and mizzen-mast, caught fire, it was carried to the shore. The battleship commander Istomin showed "fearlessness and firmness of spirit", made "prudent, skillful and quick orders." After this, the ship put down a strong central battery of the enemy, which provided great resistance to the squadron. As Nakhimov wrote: “It was impossible to stop looking at the beautiful and coolly calculated actions of the ship Paris.

The teams of other ships acted in the same selfless way. The linear 120-gun ship "Three Prelates" entered into battle with the frigates "Qaedi-Zefer" (54 guns) and "Nizamiye". When the enemy's line was interrupted by an anchor cable and the ship began to roll down the stern to the enemy, but midshipman Varnitsky was able to repair the damage. The Three Saints underwent a heavy bombardment from the side of the battery No. XXUMX, its mast badly damaged. This was noticed by the commander of the 6-gun "Rostislav" captain 84-rank A. D. Kuznetsov, he transferred the fire of the ship to this battery. The fire of two battleships she was suppressed. "Rostislav" also forced the corvette "Feise-Meabud" (1-gun) to be thrown ashore.

It should be noted that the Turkish commanders did not differ heroism. In the midst of the battle, Yahya Bey on the 22-cannon ship-frigate "Taif" withdrew from the anchor and fled to Istanbul, the Russian frigates could not pursue him because of the difference in speed. The commander of the ship “Erekli” - Ismail Bey, the commander of the corvette “Feise Meabud” - Itset-Bey, etc., escaped from the ship during the battle.

Battle results

During the three-hour battle, the Turkish squadron ceased to exist - from the squadron to the 16 pennants, 15 was destroyed, the remaining coastal fortifications and batteries were suppressed a little later. The Russian squadron did not lose a single ship. More than 3 thousand Turks were killed and injured. An 200 man was taken prisoner along with the commander Osman Pasha. Our losses - 37 killed, 233 injured.

The complete defeat of the Turkish squadron had a great influence on the military-strategic situation on the Black Sea. The naval force of the Ottoman Empire was greatly weakened. The Turkish ground forces on the Danube and the Russian-Turkish border in the Caucasus were deprived of the support of the fleet. The Black Sea Fleet could now unhindered support the maritime flanks of the Russian armies on the Caucasian and Danube fronts. If it were not for the intervention of the war between Britain and France, then the Turks would hardly have lasted a long time.

The defeat of the Turkish squadron was of great importance for the situation in the Caucasus. Nakhimov struck a powerful blow to the plans of Porta and its allies on the landing of troops on the Caucasian coast of the Black Sea.

Sinop battle again showed the world the heroism, courage, courage of Russian sailors. So Nakhimov wrote that the Black Sea sailors showed "true Russian courage." In this naval battle, the results of the advanced training and education system for seafarers and commanders of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, led by the best Russian naval commanders, clearly showed themselves. High combat skills, which showed the sailors in the Battle of Sinop, was achieved by hard training, study, sea trips. Sinop "exam" proved the highest combat readiness of the sailors and commanders of the Black Sea Fleet. The high skill level was shown by Russian naval gunners, during the battle they fired more than 18 thousand shells at the enemy. The highest rate of fire was shown by the rostislav’s gunners, from each gun of the operating side shots were fired on 75-100. On other ships, 30-70 shots were fired with every weapon on the active side.

The battle of Sinop demonstrated the importance of bomb bombers for the future development of the Navy. The battle showed the great vulnerability of wooden ships to the fire of such guns. It became obvious that it was necessary to strengthen the armor protection of ships.

This battle showed the highest skill of the Russian admiral Pavel Stepanovich Nakhimov, who correctly took into account his forces and forces of the enemy, worked out the battle plan in detail, showed perseverance in achieving the goal. I was able to skillfully build a squadron to break into the raid and to fight, to organize the interaction between the ships. He managed to save the lives of crews, it proves the absence of dead ships and the relatively low human losses of the Russian squadron.

Sinop battle was the result, a brilliant point to the centuries-old development of sailing fleets. Moreover, both Pavel Nakhimov and Vladimir Kornilov understood this very well, considering that it was necessary to quickly develop the Russian steamship fleet.


Battleship "Paris"
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. wk
    +3
    1 December 2011 07: 51
    Glory to the Russian fleet! Eternal memory to Nakhimov and his brave sailors!
  2. Tolia
    -8
    1 December 2011 08: 50
    There is no glory to the Russian fleet for a long time .... the last major naval battle at Tsushima, its result is known ... and after Sinop, they literally drowned their fleet in Sevastopol Bay just a few years later, since he was helpless against the steam-driven English fleet ...Amen...
    1. Perseus
      +3
      1 December 2011 10: 01
      Actually, the fleet in Sevastopol was flooded so that the British did not enter the bay
      1. ZHORA
        -5
        1 December 2011 10: 51
        So why didn’t such a valiant fleet with such an experienced admiral sink this miserable English expeditionary force, which operated very far from its supply bases and allowed it to enter directly into the heart of Sevastopol?
        1. Mr. Truth
          +1
          1 December 2011 11: 12
          And how many pennants were in this miserable expeditionary force? Together with the allies almost 90,
        2. 0
          2 December 2011 04: 33
          zhora, study history .. because you probably don’t teach it in kakyandii ...
        3. Perseus
          0
          10 December 2011 23: 39
          The fleet was technically backward, you are right. Moreover, the whole army at that time was technically much inferior to the enemy, for example, Russian rifles hit 300 meters with force, while English rifles at 700 (!) Therefore in this war (although this is traditionally a strong side), we relied on close combat, but what is surprising, the losses with all the lag were almost the same.
      2. +1
        1 December 2011 12: 35
        Russians fight in spirit!
        It can be seen because our army is not armed?
        1. -1
          2 December 2011 04: 34
          your army is probably not armed ...
    2. +5
      1 December 2011 14: 36
      Duc, is someone arguing? Everything was; there were times of decline, there were times of rise, there were loud victories and no less loud defeats, this is what is called History and Traditions. France had Abukir and Trafalgar, the USA had Pearl Harbor, and under Jutland the Germans threw the Britons, but agreed; neither France, nor the USA, nor Britain ceased to be Great Sea Powers after that. So your sarcasm is not appropriate.
    3. 0
      2 December 2011 04: 31
      in spite of the fact that Russia regularly gives its foes to its foes, the boobies, like you, still hope that this happens due to a misunderstanding .. all the time they are trying to test their theory and get it again ...

      and yes ... Russia, in contrast to ALL who have broken off the under-states, still has a fleet, army and aviation, for which it is not a shame ..
  3. storm12
    +3
    1 December 2011 12: 05
    If Admiral Makarov had commanded our squadron in the Tsushima battle, the victory would be ours. Glory to the Russian Navy!
    1. ZHORA
      -4
      1 December 2011 13: 23
      First, the Japanese sank the bulk of the Pacific squadron near Port Arthur ... then the entire Baltic fleet under Tsushima ... and what prevented Makarov from drowning the Japanese with his Pacific? the answer was given even by contemporaries the backwardness of the Russian fleet ... Glory to the Russian Fleet!
      1. +2
        1 December 2011 14: 03
        The most modern cruiser (at that time) "Varyag" gave battle. One for the crowd. More like a squadron (or even three squadrons, as at Tsushima) did not approach ours.
      2. +2
        1 December 2011 14: 08
        S.O. Makarov found an extremely difficult situation in Port Arthur and was forced to pay for other people's failures. Against twenty armadillos and cruisers X. Togo in the Yellow Sea, he had only nine. “Tsesarevich” and “Retvizan”, taken aground on February 24, were corrected with the help of wooden caissons, brought under the holes. They could come into operation no earlier than three months later thanks to the arrival of 189 artisans of the Baltic factory to Port Arthur, led by the talented ship engineer N.N. Kuteinikov. The repair of the Pallas docked was moving somewhat faster. The state of destroyers left much to be desired. In March 1904, “Terrible” and “Slender” entered service, of the 23 units no more than a third were ready to go to sea. Organizational and technical measures carried out by order of the fleet commander were somewhat successful: at the end of March, 13 destroyers left the squadron.
      3. 0
        2 December 2011 04: 39
        Jora, if you hadn’t been absent from school at one time, you should have known that Admiral Makarov died as a result of a ship’s bombing in a Japanese mine almost immediately after arriving in Port Arthur ... history certainly does not suffer a subjunctive mood (I doubt that you the meaning of this expression is familiar), but be sure that if he commanded, nothing would stop the Russian fleet from kicking asses of the Japs ... and they didn’t beat them like that ... so your brain is obviously backward ...
      4. 0
        2 December 2011 19: 34
        Admiral Makarov was prevented by the sinking of the Japanese landmine, which blew up the battleship Petorpavlovsk and the valiant admiral with it.
      5. wesmann
        0
        3 December 2011 13: 18
        Read Pikul, "Tsushima" there you will find the answer!
        1. 0
          3 December 2011 17: 22
          Quote: wesmann
          Honor Pikul

          and what does he have to do with it?
          not a historian, and he treated the facts very freely
          his works express only the relationship (his or someone else's) to what happened
  4. jamert
    -11
    1 December 2011 13: 55
    The result of that war is known. Therefore, a single battle won does not mean anything.
    Russian fleet - a place at the bottom !!!!!
    1. +2
      1 December 2011 14: 44
      Well, if at the bottom there is a place for the Russian Fleet, then probably on the surface of the sea the very place for the Ukrainian Fleet? Do not enlighten about significant and heroic milestones in his, no doubt, outstanding story ....
      1. jamert
        -9
        1 December 2011 23: 27
        I in no way exalt the Ukrainian fleet. The rampant boasting of Russian cheers-patriots simply staggered.
        1. 0
          2 December 2011 04: 43
          and what to do, such is fate and history ... there is something to be proud of ... when the outskirts achieve something, you can get out of your caches and also boast ...
    2. stalker
      +2
      1 December 2011 16: 51
      And your place is in a bucket.
    3. 0
      2 December 2011 04: 41
      go eat your lobio, look do not crap one's pants, dreamer .. wink
  5. +1
    1 December 2011 13: 57
    Nakhimov was an outstanding strategist of his time. Not only did he complete not only a combat, but also a "political" mission, but also almost without losses. A total of 37 of our killed in battle fleet to fleet!
  6. +1
    1 December 2011 14: 18
    The Crimean front at that time was the only one of SIX TVDs on which Russian troops acted simultaneously.

    Reducing the crisis, fraught with the first world war to a draw and victory in FIVE TVD - the result is simply magnificent. And the British, provoked by a long-term campaign in Central Asia, still have not regained their presence in the region.

    The conclusions are obvious.
  7. Igor91
    +2
    1 December 2011 14: 49
    yes they found guys to argue with whom they don’t have any pride in their great-grandfathers and I won’t be surprised if they’re not even Slavs
    1. svvaulsh
      -1
      1 December 2011 16: 58
      They are not Slavs. They are ukry. And ukry is the ancestors of Adam and Eve.
      1. 0
        1 December 2011 21: 20
        That is, the ancestors of the Jews wink
      2. BYRY
        -1
        2 December 2011 03: 21
        What ancestors, they are ancestors. They, under the guise of a snake tempter, seduced Eve with an apple. And above, I'm generally afraid to think.
      3. docenton
        +1
        6 December 2011 17: 40
        You are all stupid people, if you start quarreling with each other. In all wars, Ukrainians and Russians fought side by side to defend or glorify their homeland, both under Tsushima and Sinope. But for people like you, there were losses. What Russia what Ukraine mixed ethnic groups. And if we cannot respect each other within the Slovenian nations, we will never achieve respect in other countries.
  8. 0
    1 December 2011 18: 29
    eternal memory to the soldiers who defended the borders of our Fatherland!
  9. 0
    2 December 2011 04: 01
    okay yapping stupid provocatively, but how do you like that?
    For a moment, it was not so much the devastating victory of the Russians that dawned, considering the correlation of forces, there was no need to wait for anything else, the terrifying impact attributed to the bombs
    After Sinop, England and France, who feared that the Turkish barrier would collapse, holding back Russia's expansion into the Eastern Mediterranean, came out to defend Turkey. The Crimean War began.
    1. 0
      2 December 2011 04: 25
      Quote: Denis
      All the time, it was not so much the grieving defeat of the Russian victory that dread, considering the balance of power there was no other way to wait, the terrifying impact attributed to the bombs After Sinop, England and France, who feared that the Turkish barrier that restrained Russia's expansion into the Eastern Mediterranean, would collapse Defense of Turkey. The Crimean War began.

      This belongs to the non-traditionally oriented scribe and the Pindos hero Edward L. scourge
      he somehow "forgot" about the coastal batteries of the Turks
      can Pindos remember this http://gusev-av.livejournal.com/62025.html?
      it is written in "The Great Admirals", this nasty letter tomorrow, the paper is hard, not to be used for the intended purpose, I will give the grandmothers on bags for seeds
  10. +1
    2 December 2011 04: 59
    By the way, about the Russian-Japanese. As far as I remember, after this war in the world, no one else fought in the "fleet to fleet" format. There were battles of 2-3 ships against the same number. And in these battles, our fleet had absolutely nothing to be ashamed of.
    In general, when the military merits of the Russians are belittled - it just makes me laugh, I have not been angry for a long time. Everything is known by comparison, and if you start comparing the Russian army with another, all other countries and 10% don’t have the strategic victories that Russia has.
    1. Starcom1183
      0
      8 July 2012 18: 35
      In the Pacific Ocean there were large naval battles, including the battles of the AUS, if of course this term is applicable at that time. However, even these "global" battles seem to be a game of children in a sandbox compared to what happened on the so-called. eastern front.
  11. Ivanych
    0
    2 December 2011 23: 01
    Glory to the sailors !!! And to the Heroes-Admirals Glory and honor !!!