New icebreaker Navy PLA

27
In late December, in the Chinese province of Liaoning, a ceremony was held to introduce the Haibing 722 diesel-electric icebreaker into the PLA Navy. bmpd with a link to navyrecognition.com.

New icebreaker Navy PLA


The icebreaker is the lead ship for the 272 project and was built at Bohai Shipbuilding Heavy Industry Company, Ltd. (BSHIC), a subsidiary of CSIC.

“The Haibing 722 icebreaker will be used mainly for escorting ships and ships in winter conditions in the periodically freezing Bohai Gulf of the Yellow Sea, including for ensuring the wiring of Chinese nuclear submarines under construction and repair in Huludao. As part of the PLA Navy, the new icebreaker replaced the former icebreaker with the same name Haibing 722, built in Shanghai in 1969 and decommissioned in July, 2013, ”the message said.

The project is fully developed in China. The ship was laid in November 2013, launched in March 2015.



According to the publication, “the icebreaker has a full displacement of 4860 m, length of 103,1 m, width of 18,6 m, main power plant is diesel-electric, full speed - 18 knots, cruising range by economic stroke - up to 7000 miles”.

The ship is equipped with a landing site capable of receiving heavy helicopters such as Z-8.

Currently, the second icebreaker of this project is being completed afloat.

  • www.navyrecognition.com, CCTV 7 / CNTV, www.haijun360.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    11 January 2016 13: 57
    The Haibing 722 icebreaker will be used mainly for escorting ships and vessels in winter conditions in the periodically freezing Yellow Sea Bohai Bay

    Well, if so. I hope the Chinese did not aim at the NSR ...
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 14: 03
      Some kind of unhealthy bullshit ...?!
      Something muddy-eyed muddy !!!
      1. +7
        11 January 2016 14: 56
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Well, if so. I hope the Chinese did not aim at the NSR ...

        He is little. In the Bohai depths of forty meters, in the surface go out only. And on the NSR, 4860t what , well, you have to pull it out, the same "Arctic" had a displacement of 23460t. And this, something like "Mudyug", the fairway at the mouth, along the Northern Dvina, to clean, and where next to a vessel from the ice to pick out. Also autonomy for about a month, probably.
        1. +1
          11 January 2016 20: 03
          He is small. In the Bohai depths of forty meters, above-water to go out only. And on the NSR, 4860t, well, you have to pull it out, the same "Arctic" had a displacement of 23460t.
          The "Ermak" about which the article was today on the VO displacement and that was more
          Already on October 17, 1898, the ship, at the behest of Emperor Nicholas II, called "Ermak", was launched. The ship was 93 meters long, then after conversion it reached 97 meters. The standard displacement was 8 thousand tons, the ship was equipped with four steam engines with a capacity of 2500 hp. - three in the stern, one in the bow.
      2. -1
        11 January 2016 18: 03
        Quote: Bone
        Some kind of unhealthy bullshit ...?!
        Something muddy-eyed muddy !!!

        So they also aimed at the north pole. The only question is on whose - ours or Alaska-American? crying
    2. -1
      11 January 2016 16: 33
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      The Haibing 722 icebreaker will be used mainly for escorting ships and vessels in winter conditions in the periodically freezing Yellow Sea Bohai Bay

      Well, if so. I hope the Chinese did not aim at the NSR ...

      I suspect that this type is really for the Yellow Sea, but experience will begin to build for the North Ocean. With aircraft carriers also comes out. Varangians bought it for experience, but what is now being stamped already before the World War.
    3. 0
      11 January 2016 19: 57
      They have nothing to do with such an icebreaker on the NSR. Even any "carrot" on the Dudinka-Murmansk line will be much more powerful.
      https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQWbB2ChtP_wNrKst6bMvXPPG_j
      VeCTHrC0n2gaeB7fgy6ZyYhs_g
  2. +2
    11 January 2016 13: 57
    It seems to me that the Chinese are going to the Arctic.
    1. +7
      11 January 2016 14: 03
      maxiban-Chinese are not suicide bombers to go to the Arctic in these pots, because the ice will crush them there once or twice.
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 15: 49
        Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
        maxiban-Chinese are not suicide bombers to go to the Arctic in these pots, because the ice will crush them there once or twice.

        But nevertheless, by the end of this year, they should finish building a new, heavy icebreaker, and dates help them there, and they certainly know how.
    2. +2
      11 January 2016 14: 14
      Yes, they only crush the ice in the bay, although in Vladivostok tugs can do this, though not everywhere, but it will be warmer with them.
    3. avt
      +1
      11 January 2016 14: 18
      Quote: maxiban
      It seems to me that the Chinese are going to the Arctic.

      what Why did it "give up"? request For the time being, they use the Arctic supplier purchased from us. And about this unit, so plainly it is not clear. Firstly, what is the capacity of this unit?; Secondly, what is its ice class? Then you can already search by type
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      I hope the Chinese did not aim at the NSR ...

      build, well, who is going where and on what. To the Arctic there, Antarctica.
  3. +2
    11 January 2016 14: 09
    Something tells me that the construction of these light icebreakers was not without the promptings of our shipbuilders. Only a suicide can go to the Arctic, but this is a good school for the Chinese to build heavy-class icebreakers.
    1. 0
      12 January 2016 01: 19
      Quote: NEXUS
      Something tells me that the construction of these light icebreakers was not without the promptings of our shipbuilders. Only a suicide can go to the Arctic, but this is a good school for the Chinese to build heavy-class icebreakers.

      What would we then order from the Chinese these icebreakers for it will be cheaper than the same Finns. Heavy Chinese icebreakers nafig did not fall. Where to apply them, but to sell to everyone for heaven’s sake.
  4. PPD
    +2
    11 January 2016 14: 10
    What is the Arctic there! Look at its stem and compare it with at least an icebreaker, no,
    with the icebreaker Lenin. The difference in physical strength in the eye.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 15: 56
      Quote: PPD
      Look at its stem

      Normal to himself, because he only stabs thin ice, and heavy - breaks with his weight, crawling on him.
  5. +1
    11 January 2016 14: 11
    Quickly build however.
    1. +2
      11 January 2016 15: 58
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      Quickly build however.

      For comparison - the Finns, a more powerful icebreaker made in 10 months.
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 16: 30
        Quote: lelikas
        For comparison - the Finns, a more powerful icebreaker made in 10 months.

        Yes, the Russian state-owned United Shipbuilding Company is not badly working (the shipyards of Arctech Helsinki Shipyard are 100% owned by USC). There, by the way, there is also an icebreaking supply vessel of the Aker ARC 121 project for the Russian shipping company Sovcomflot. And do not care all the sanctions. feel
  6. 0
    11 January 2016 14: 11
    We decided to go under the guise of Canadians and Amers to bite off a bit of the Arctic.
    1. +2
      11 January 2016 14: 21
      Quote: vkfriendly
      We decided to go under the guise of Canadians and Amers to bite off a bit of the Arctic.

      I suspect that these pelvis and meter ice are not pricked ... and you are talking about the Arctic.
      1. avt
        0
        11 January 2016 14: 59
        Quote: NEXUS
        I suspect that these pelvis and meter ice do not prick ...

        Well, since the icebreaker, then probably according to their Chinese B1 * from 0,5 meters, but how much higher ... request Again, the power is not known. So we can’t talk about access to the Arctic ice.
        1. 0
          11 January 2016 15: 15
          The icebreaker does not work as much power as mass. It’s not pricking but pushing ice, crawling on top of it. Chinese vessels in the Arctic have nothing to do.
        2. +2
          11 January 2016 15: 48
          Quote: avt
          Well, since the icebreaker, then probably according to their Chinese B1 * from 0,5 meters, but how much higher ... Again, the power is not known. So, we can’t talk about access to the Arctic ice.

          And the diesel power plant ... our nuclear powered icebreakers break ice up to 2 meters (push through). Now they are building ice breakers of the LK-60YA type (project 22220), which will break up to 2,25 meters of ice and they will have nuclear SU.
  7. 0
    11 January 2016 14: 12
    Where are they going on such labels then?
  8. 0
    11 January 2016 15: 21
    New icebreaker Navy PLA

    Wow! And did they have an old one? belay
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 15: 41
      Quote: Lyapis
      Wow! And did they have an old one?

      Yeah, and it’s even less icebreaking than the new one.
  9. DPN
    0
    11 January 2016 15: 41
    I must say scared right, I thought if they were going to visit us to the north.
  10. 0
    11 January 2016 15: 58
    Of course, these pepelats are not for the Arctic, the previous 071G series could cope with ice thickness up to 1m, which is abundant for the Chinese coastal zone, in the Arctic ice is from 0.8 (one-year-old) to 5m, on average 3-4m, but the question is not only how thick the ice can be broken, but also in order not to be "rubbed" in the dust by the masses of ice, this wunderwaffle for internal use with which it quite copes.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"