Yatsenyuk called the price of Russian gas for Ukraine unacceptable

68
Approved rates of export customs duties on Russian gas, which is supplied to the Ukrainian territory. When taking into account new rates, Kiev will be able to purchase Russian gas at the price of 212,23 dollars per thousand cubic meters. Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk responded to the price voiced by Russia. According to him, such a price "is too high."

Yatsenyuk during a ten-minute appeal to the citizens of the country said (published on Yatsenyuk’s page Facebook):
We have stopped buying gas from the Russian Federation. 1 January they (Russia) billed us with the price of gas at 212 dollars per thousand cubic meters. We do not buy gas from Russia, since we buy gas from the European Union at a lower price than Russia offered us. In the European Union, the average cost of gas we buy is around 200 dollars. We have accumulated almost 13 billions of cubic meters of gas. This is 2,3 billion more than at the same time 2015 of the year. For the passage of the heating season of this volume is enough.


In addition, Yatsenyuk said that many Ukrainians ("every third") receive a subsidy for utilities. Statements of the Ukrainian Prime Minister commented on the citizens of the country.

Inna Beskova (Kiev):
Last year there was no heating in the week, on -20 street, in the apartment + 15. Conclusion: why heat, if you can take 85% cost for heating and do nothing. Handsome !!! Maybe you need to measure the temperature of the batteries? This is much more informative and fair. After all, the people are not as illiterate as Arseny Petrovich would like. And about subsidies. According to him, every third Ukrainian receives a subsidy, it follows from this that among my 100 friends, at least 30 should receive it. Believe me, my circle of acquaintances is from 50 to 80 years old, and not one of them receives a subsidy. ENOUGH TO LIE WITH YOURSELF AND PEOPLE.


Yatsenyuk called the price of Russian gas for Ukraine unacceptable


Anatoly Topilo:
These "reformers" set the gas consumption rate for the private sector 7 cubic meters. on 1 sq.m. heated area. I figured out what my gas consumption for 2012,13,14 years. And I got 4.88 m 3 on 1 m. And for 3 of the month 2015 at the temperature in the house + 18 I have 3,5 cubic meters per 1 sq.m. heated area. This shows that 50% of the money for the subsidies transferred to the regional gas (OLIGARCHAM) excess. So who did you do Communism, Mr. Yatsenyuk?
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    11 January 2016 06: 43
    Yatsenyuk hopes that in the end, Russia has a generous soul, Russia will yield.
    1. +24
      11 January 2016 06: 50
      Quote: avvg
      He hopes that Russia will yield.

      And at the same time, a thief was caught by a transit pipe leading to Europe: fellow laughing
      1. +4
        11 January 2016 11: 14
        they themselves allowed these bastards to power, now they complain, even if they pay a penny out of their pockets for their inaction, they organized a revolution, they were silent, they were to blame for everything ... and the campaign was too cold ... flawed people ...
        1. 0
          11 January 2016 15: 15
          Yes, they didn’t let anyone in, the Nulandiha launched this brat to them. Ukraine lives in fear.
    2. +12
      11 January 2016 06: 59
      Only a freebie is acceptable for them, and even then in case of payment by the supplier ...
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 09: 46
        Yatsenyuk called the price of Russian gas for Ukraine unacceptable

        Now ordinary Ukrainians will have to re-heat themselves with their fart gas, if they have something to eat.
        Yatsenyuk probably counts on this, only "modestly" is silent about it. Well, he's a scoundrel!
    3. +1
      11 January 2016 07: 56
      Quote: avvg
      Yatsenyuk hopes that in the end, Russia has a generous soul, Russia will yield.

      Does Gazprom have any options? Where to put the excess gas into the atmosphere?
      1. +3
        11 January 2016 14: 37
        Actually, there are options, half of the country is not supplied with gas. For example, a brother lives in a private sector (a city with a million inhabitants), a gas pipe runs along the street. Gas workers want to have 4 (one hundred) thousand rubles to bring them into the house (distance 100 meters). Isn't it too much? And you say: "What to do with gas?"
    4. +2
      11 January 2016 08: 04
      I still can not understand what the rabbit ultimately achieves? The fact that he leads the country into chaos is understandable, but why?
      1. +8
        11 January 2016 08: 10
        Quote: vodolaz
        What does the rabbit ultimately achieve?

        The creation in the minds of Ukrainians of at least some kind of illusion of victory over Russia. That's all. But Gazprom made a beautiful feint ....
        It is clear that it is possible to conclude a supply agreement. But it seems to me that the price is specially comparable to the European one. In order to transfer risks from Ukraine to the EU, the Europeans pay regularly for gas. And these are their problems now, knocking money out of Ukraine.
        And giving the opportunity to earn extra money at the Ukrainians, we buy some of their loyalty. Something like this.
        1. +2
          11 January 2016 08: 49
          Yatsenyuk called the price of Russian gas for Ukraine unacceptable

          Does Yatsenyuk want to make one big Genichesk from Ukraine? I’m afraid that Gazprom doesn’t have such an amount of free gas.
        2. +4
          11 January 2016 10: 35
          Quote: domokl
          But Gazprom made a beautiful feint ...

          Why does Miller have such a good salary? For feints, it turns out! A feint with the "South Stream" - minus 5 lards, a feint with discounts for Bandera partners in 14, a few hundred lemons, a feint with a "Turkish stream" is still considered. And then there are good-natured Putin's feints, but this is sacred. So why shouldn't the egg-bearer wander about, if he is so prettier?
      2. +3
        11 January 2016 08: 57
        Quote: vodolaz
        I still can not understand what the rabbit ultimately achieves? The fact that he leads the country into chaos is understandable, but why?

        And then, so that as many Slovenes as possible on the outskirts would kill each other, they would simply die out or go down morally and mentally to the level of the Stone Age. Moreover, for the Yankees themselves, the words: Slovens, Ukrainians and Russians are synonyms. From the outskirts of the United States, they want only territory, preferably without or with a minimal population, which will serve their masters and which will be ruled out simply.
        Also, the territory of the Outskirts is ideally suited for NATO military bases, because only 650 km from Moscow to Kharkov, 760 km from Moscow to Kuev, and only 1700 km from the borders of the Outskirts to the Urals. In my opinion, a very convenient bridgehead to control the entire European territory of Russia and the Urals. recourse
      3. +4
        11 January 2016 11: 42
        Quote: vodolaz
        I still can not understand what the rabbit ultimately achieves? The fact that he leads the country into chaos is understandable, but why?

        Yatsenyuk does not solve anything there. This is just a talking head that only voices what she was ordered to.
        Ukraine does not have its own money to buy gas and payment comes from the treasury of Europe.
        If Europe pays for gas, then it is much more interesting for it to close the cash flow from Europe to Europe i.e. payment through Ukraine of reverse European gas to one of the EU countries, than to give this money to Russia. At the same time, Ukraine will still have to pay interest on gas loans to Europe.
        As for the "reverse", in my opinion this term itself is "virtual" and Ukraine simply takes from the transit pipe the missing volume of gas intended for Europe. The turbines installed at the compressor stations were initially pumped in one direction and the back pressure requires a return pipe laying. The gas in the pipe cannot blow in different directions)))
        So we still have to endure these "Yatsenyuk" oddities until the completion of the construction of Nord Stream 2 and the loss of Ukraine's status as a transit country in 2019. Sensing that the loss of freebies is inevitable, Ukraine is trying to convince Europe of the need to stop the SevPotok-2 project, but Europe is unlikely to agree to this, since she was already tired of the "new Europeans".
    5. 0
      11 January 2016 17: 06
      What do you want from an unhappy person? Should he somehow beat off the received loot? "Do not shoot the taper, he plays as best he can" laughing
  2. P81
    +10
    11 January 2016 06: 46
    Yes, let firewood be heated once expensive, no one forces. Do not want do not take it!
    1. +16
      11 January 2016 08: 23
      Zadolbali already with these Ukrainians. Nobody remembers about Russia. half of Siberia is heated with wood, and frosts are far from twenty degrees.
      1. 0
        11 January 2016 10: 01
        In the European Union, the average cost of the gas we buy is around 200 dollars.
        Oh, these storytellers, oh, these fairy tales laughing
      2. +2
        11 January 2016 12: 37
        Quote: tor11121
        Zadolbali already with these Ukrainians. Nobody remembers about Russia. half of Siberia is heated with wood, and frosts are far from twenty degrees.

        Our country consumes extremely little gas, but gas is much more convenient than coal or firewood, and cheaper. The inaccessibility of gas raw materials greatly limits gas chemistry, which is also preferable to oil, as a rule.
  3. +4
    11 January 2016 06: 47
    Well, it will lead to something .... request winked
  4. +5
    11 January 2016 06: 48
    Yatsenyuk called the price of Russian gas for Ukraine unacceptable

    It is surprising that our side is still doing business with them and, moreover, is constantly making concessions. What they use, using a proven method of blackmail. It’s hard to even say what’s big politics or Gazprom’s interests. But with constant blackmail, it's time to end.
    1. +3
      11 January 2016 07: 37
      Quote: rotmistr60
      It’s hard to even say what’s big politics or Gazprom’s interests.

      Both that and another. Look at the validity of gas supply agreements. Until the gas supply agreement through the Ukrainian gas transportation system expires, you will have to suffer until then, that is, two more years under the existing agreement. And then you can put this network on overhaul and forget about her.
      1. +3
        11 January 2016 10: 41
        Quote: Amurets
        Look at the validity of gas supply agreements. Until the gas supply agreement through the Ukrainian gas transportation system expires, you will have to suffer until then, that is, another two years under the existing agreement.

        There would be a desire, but force majeure will always be found. wink
  5. +4
    11 January 2016 06: 50
    Last year there was no heating for a week, on the street -20, in the apartment + 15.


    The remark is absolutely unrealistic - at -20, "-" will also be in the apartment (without heating).
    I wonder how much Slovakia pays Gazprom that Yatsenyuk costs gas on 200?
    1. +2
      11 January 2016 08: 13
      Quote: Aleksander
      I wonder how much Slovakia pays Gazprom that Yatsenyuk costs gas on 200?
      and who pays Slovakia?
  6. +5
    11 January 2016 06: 50
    Zombies continue, in this matter it is impossible to stop, otherwise people will wake up.
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 08: 00
      Quote: Aleksander
      The remark is absolutely unrealistic - at -20, "-" will also be in the apartment (without heating).

      Well, heating is not only batteries, it is also heaters, heat guns, infrared floors, etc.
      1. +2
        11 January 2016 08: 14
        Quote: PSih2097
        Well, heating is not only batteries, it is also heaters, heat guns, infrared floors, etc.
        + The electricity bill is such that heating is no longer necessary, and so sweat.
    2. +2
      11 January 2016 09: 13
      Quote: Alexander 3
      Zombies continue, in this matter it is impossible to stop, otherwise people will wake up.


      In this and the next two generations, the population of Ukraine is unlikely to wake up. The virus has penetrated so much into the genes of non-healers that only deep and total vaccination of all newborn babies of both sexes can still save future generations of Ukraine.
  7. +14
    11 January 2016 06: 57
    Quote: Alexander 3
    Zombies continue, in this matter it is impossible to stop, otherwise people will wake up.

    I am surprised at the behavior of our government, which offers the Nazis gas at a discount, and she has the Ukrainian DULIA in her nose. Well, one must not respect himself so much that the Ukronazists cease to reckon with Russia and continue to bother about the suffering of ordinary people. Let ordinary people go to the militia, and we will help them. And so it is not necessary to offer. Want to pay and get the goods. There is no goodbye. Let Slovakia sell gas to them, and one can think about whether to limit the supply of gas to the BRNO to the extent of their own needs only.
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 11: 40
      Quote: valokordin
      I wonder at the behavior of our government,

      But not me. I won’t be surprised either that gas in 2016 will be offered at such a discount that fastidious Kiev partners will agree.
  8. +4
    11 January 2016 06: 57
    And these comrades, let me say it, paid off past debts at least? For me, they still owe Gazprom a doculliard of dollars, or am I wrong?
  9. +13
    11 January 2016 06: 59
    Quote: avvg
    Yatsenyuk hopes that in the end, Russia has a generous soul, Russia will yield.

    Think not give in? They will not yield to us as swamies, but it’s easy for them, you will see.
    1. +2
      11 January 2016 09: 54
      Quote: Man1
      Think not give in? They will not yield to us as swamies, but it’s easy for them, you will see.

      More than once it was.
  10. +3
    11 January 2016 07: 01
    When will the gas be completely cut off to this under-state ???? They didn’t even deserve it for $ 500.
    "..know she is strong, barks at an elephant ..". Hypocrites, when will they stop stealing gas from Russia, or begging? Apparently it is better to sit without light and heat, but enjoy "independence" ...
  11. +7
    11 January 2016 07: 03
    So ukrofashikam gas at a discount, and they tear off their own skins in three, to begin to strain our power !! Enough already?
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 09: 54
      This is Putin’s cunning plan.
  12. +14
    11 January 2016 07: 04
    I would be in Putin’s place, for the constant dirty insults of these nonhumans, they would break the price at exorbitant prices. And he is like a silly brotherly people, brotherly people, to whom I do not know these scumbags brothers, but I don’t know for sure.
  13. +11
    11 January 2016 07: 05
    Legs, wings ... The main thing is the tail! (c) What is the difference at what price to set if the rabbit has no money. Let them freeze, this is their superstitious choice. hi
  14. +2
    11 January 2016 07: 08
    Quote: horoh
    So ukrofashikam gas at a discount, and they tear off their own skins in three, to begin to strain our power !! Enough already?

    Tighten up just now noticed ?!
  15. +13
    11 January 2016 07: 10
    Many pensioners are no longer able to buy gas for heating. Stoked with wood, freezing.
    A communal apartment, even for a family of workers, costs one salary; those who work in the family with difficulty survive. This is from the words of those living in Ukraine.
    Subsidies are obviously stolen before reaching the population.
    I don’t see the point in any kind of gas discounts for Ukraine — this is helping corrupt officials and wealthy oligarchs.
    Do not need gas, let them not take it.
    Does Gazprom have surplus gas? Let the Russians supply gas, then there will be no interest in the collapse of the ruble. Today, gas is available only in large cities and in rural areas where there is little gas.
    It's time to provide the Russians with "national treasure", otherwise it only works abroad.
    1. +1
      11 January 2016 12: 43
      The retail price of gas for the population in 2011 was 7 times higher than the purchase price in Russia. For industrialists, the price is completely different. As far as I understood, nothing has fundamentally changed. The Ukrainian elite earns themselves just on margin when selling gas to its population, and industry is often subsidized. No wonder those who come to power immediately put their people or relatives in near-gas organizations.
    2. 0
      11 January 2016 15: 20
      Quote: olimpiada15
      It's time to provide the Russians with "national treasure", otherwise it only works abroad.


      Dear guardians of rural residents! Did you know that in the remaining and existing only on geographical maps, villages / villages live from one to 2 - 5 indigenous, living out their days "stubborn" old people who do not want to move to cities / towns to their children or other relatives. And they perfectly use good old wood for heating. If necessary, use is also made of LNG (liquefied natural gas), which is much cheaper than the so-called main line, because it is not required to bring a gas pipeline to a house with a length of N hundreds of meters, or even more. And this translates into hundreds of thousands of so-called wooden rubles. You will say that the state cannot do it at its own expense. It can, if each of you makes a contribution to help these "stubborn" old people.

      And yet ... Each of these villages has long become
      summer cottages and are used only in the summer.

      PS To many "guardians" of the villagers, my doubts can
      seem blasphemous. But life is life.
      Do not judge strictly.
    3. 0
      11 January 2016 15: 20
      Quote: olimpiada15
      It's time to provide the Russians with "national treasure", otherwise it only works abroad.


      Dear guardians of rural residents! Did you know that in the remaining and existing only on geographical maps, villages / villages live from one to 2 - 5 indigenous, living out their days "stubborn" old people who do not want to move to cities / towns to their children or other relatives. And they perfectly use good old wood for heating. If necessary, use is also made of LNG (liquefied natural gas), which is much cheaper than the so-called main line, because it is not required to bring a gas pipeline to a house with a length of N hundreds of meters, or even more. And this translates into hundreds of thousands of so-called wooden rubles. You will say that the state cannot do it at its own expense. It can, if each of you makes a contribution to help these "stubborn" old people.

      And yet ... Each of these villages has long become
      summer cottages and are used only in the summer.

      PS To many "guardians" of the villagers, my doubts can
      seem blasphemous. But life is life.
      Do not judge strictly.
  16. +1
    11 January 2016 07: 10
    Let them jump for a sugare, they do it well. For one, they will raise the temperature in the street, everything will be warmer in the houses if they do not like the price!
  17. +3
    11 January 2016 07: 15
    From this it can be seen that 50% of the money for subsidies was transferred to the regional gas (OLIGARHAM) extra

    All can not be stolen. Theft has grown into a daily need
  18. +3
    11 January 2016 07: 19
    Setting the price for Ukraine higher than for Europe is a normal political move. They buy our own gas, but problems with payment are not our concern. And stick to the pipe directly does not work.
  19. +2
    11 January 2016 07: 24
    Well, if it's dear to you, don't take it, what else? Buy "European", it is also from Russia, only "cleared" by passing through the territory of Poland or Slovakia.
  20. +1
    11 January 2016 07: 27
    Of course, Gazprom’s commercial interests come first here, there is overstocking of the Russian Gas Market (see the stat report of Gazprom), but on the whole they don’t want to heat gas, it’s possible to dung.
    1. ICT
      +2
      11 January 2016 07: 54
      Quote: avg-mgn
      overstocking of the Russian gas market takes place


      about five years ago, they began to pull pipes in an area where there is no gas, but after a couple of years even removed the concrete columns (what did the same do)
  21. 0
    11 January 2016 07: 30
    Again - "throw pearls in front of pigs"?
  22. +2
    11 January 2016 07: 51
    (We do not buy gas from Russia, since we buy gas in the European Union cheaper than Russia suggested to us.)

    The answer begs one - DO NOT WANT, DO NOT EAT.
  23. +1
    11 January 2016 07: 53
    No, the market is big, let’s look where it’s cheaper.
    Our business is to offer, their business is to refuse.
    By the way, what about three lard?
  24. +4
    11 January 2016 08: 00
    Gazprom has an excess of gas. Volumes in Europe have fallen, China doesn’t really need our gas, where to put it?
    There is of course a way out, to increase domestic consumption, but this is not interesting for Gazprom in anyone because it requires huge investments, and payment is only in rubles, not in foreign currency ...
    1. +5
      11 January 2016 08: 28
      Quote: Mera Joota
      but it’s not interesting for anyone in Gazprom because it requires huge investments, and payment is only in rubles, not in currency ...

      given the daily salary of the miller, this is natural, why do something long-term, when there is already ready bringing immediate profit.
    2. +5
      11 January 2016 09: 04
      Gasification at our place is not at the expense of Gazprom, but at the expense of the subscriber. If my memory serves me right, then last year about 150 thousand rubles were taken for connection (in the Leningrad region). As I understand it, on the part of Gazprom this is not an investment, but a profit. In Primorye, they didn’t connect anything besides the CHPPs; they are not interested in domestic consumption for rubles.
      1. +2
        11 January 2016 09: 11
        Quote: faridg7
        Gasification at our place is not at the expense of Gazprom, but at the expense of the subscriber. If my memory serves me right, then last year about 150 thousand rubles were taken for connection (in the Leningrad region). As I understand it, on the part of Gazprom this is not an investment, but a profit. In Primorye, they didn’t connect anything besides the CHPPs; they are not interested in domestic consumption for rubles.

        It's you about the gasification of regions where there is already a pipe, I'm talking about regions where there is no gas. For example, Khakassia or Buryatia, where they could agree to gasify for 150 thousand, but they have only two options, coal or firewood.
      2. ICT
        -1
        11 January 2016 09: 20
        Quote: faridg7
        took about 150 thousand rubles.


        in Vladimir there is about 100 (a project and a pipe to the house, pipes in the village or all of them for a fee, well, maybe the administration will partially compensate, and the pipe to the village is conditionally operated by Gazprom (you’ll understand them too)) and everyone is ready to pay because . gas in the village is civilization
      3. Hey
        +1
        11 January 2016 12: 02
        There are many complaints against Gazprom, but we will be honest.
        Gazprom really invested in the gasification of the country. Under the gasification program, Gazprom was responsible for bringing the pipe only to the locality specified in this program. Gazprom has fulfilled its part of the program. Other commercial enterprises such as Regiongaz operate inside the settlements. So they break the price for connection and maintenance. But these are problems of local leadership and the effectiveness of the work of these enterprises. These companies buy gas from Gazprom and are no longer connected with it. So the claim in this matter is not at the address.
        1. 0
          11 January 2016 12: 47
          Absolutely right, and to Ukraine and Russia, the regional monopolists are the most bullied, breaking inappropriate prices. They don’t have any desire to optimize expenses. The only concern is maximizing profits. Often, such organizations are covered by the local government or individual officials, which helps to maintain the position and receive tenders.
  25. +2
    11 January 2016 08: 41
    The main goal of the hype about rejecting the purchase of Russian gas is to show that the government can solve something and seem to put pressure on Russia. But the question is, whose gas is in the pipe from Slovakia? I don’t hear anything about the drop in gas supplies to Europe. we don’t give a damn about the gas supplied to them. Where do I go wrong if I am mistaken with the volume of gas supplied to the eurozone
  26. +2
    11 January 2016 08: 53
    What price was not, everything is wrong for them, I don’t like it, don’t take it
  27. +2
    11 January 2016 08: 57
    That is why it seems to me that gazbrom is ready to sell gas to anyone and at almost any price ... And Ukrainians can really buy gas cheaper in Europe, but with one "BUT", payment for part of the gas goes towards transit payments. Those. instead of additional money for the economy - just gas ...
    But for Gazprom, this option is probably even more profitable than direct purchases of Ukrainians, because the geyropeytsy, in order to sell something unnecessary Ukrainians, you need to buy this unnecessary from Gazprom
  28. +4
    11 January 2016 09: 04
    Quote: Mera Joota
    Quote: avvg
    Yatsenyuk hopes that in the end, Russia has a generous soul, Russia will yield.

    Does Gazprom have any options? Where to put the excess gas into the atmosphere?

    Gasify and supply blue fuel to regions-settlements where people dream of gas.
    This is better than trolling nothing with a zhovto-blakitny "partner"!
    In Russia there are a huge number of such regions.
    1. +4
      11 January 2016 09: 15
      Quote: Yuri Nikolaevich
      This is better than trolling nothing with a zhovto-blakitny "partner"!
      In Russia there are a huge number of such regions.

      So this is a DREAM of many Russians, only Gazprom does not have such a DREAM, and therefore it is unrealizable.
  29. +3
    11 January 2016 09: 31
    Quote: O. Bender
    Something is not heard about the drop in the volume of gas supplies to Europe. And if the euro members pay us for the delivered gas in full, then they don’t give a damn where they are delivering it. If I am mistaken, the volume of gas supplied to the eurozone

    Will they talk about this on TV? They can only talk about Crimea and about Ukraine.
    I will say that for 2014-2015. The volume of gas transportation to Europe via the Yamburg - Uzhgorod branch fell by 40%.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 09: 49
      This is only one branch, and on the other? And as for TV, I think it’s not necessary to explain. From Gazprom, such information does not get infa as a bee has a special status. So how to unlock numbers?
      1. +1
        11 January 2016 10: 12
        Quote: O. Bender
        This is only one branch, and on the other? And as for TV, I think it’s not necessary to explain. From Gazprom, such information does not get infa as a bee has a special status. So how to unlock numbers?

        What status is a well-known fact and open information. Any worker on this gas pipeline knows this.
        The point is that the bulk from Urengoy is thrown to China through Surgut and Nizhnevartovsk, and from Yamburg via another branch to the Nord Stream 2.
        One can rejoice, but the joke is that then the Yamburg-Uzhgorod branch will not be needed in full, which means that people will be kicked out of work under assholes and most cities formed to transport gas will bend right away.
        Yes, and they like to build gas pipelines, there immediately huge money and kickbacks to Moscow gaskets 30%;)
      2. The comment was deleted.
  30. 0
    11 January 2016 09: 41
    Yaytsehniuk as usual in shock.
  31. +3
    11 January 2016 09: 43
    But what's the point of selling gas to a country that does not pay for gas supplies. Let the ruin outbid from Europe and payments will be their headache, European consumers pay for gas.
    In general, the situation with gas in the country is outraged, we have high gas prices, we have not gasified almost the entire countryside, we need cheap hydrocarbons to develop our economy, we have a huge number of people who are unemployed and engaged in deceiving the population to resell goods more expensive. We have everything for production — raw materials, labor resources, and demand for everyday goods, but low solvency of the population due to low salaries, due to the depreciating ruble exchange rate. The ruble exchange rate affects primarily the population who buys goods in the ruble zone, the ruble exchange rate is reflected in the price of these goods: who will sell Russian cucumbers at a price of 50 rubles, if the import price is not less than 150 rubles, it is clear that the sale price will be equalized. The solvency of the population falls due to the imposed services - we pay for the advertising services for medicines, the purchase of which depends on the disease and the prescription of the doctor. The same situation in the housing and communal services, at first we are obliged to set up counters, and then pay the debts of unscrupulous neighbors. Etc.
    The Russian economy resembles that of a chicken coop, where hens are underfed and generously fed cocks that run to a neighboring chicken coop, and are outraged that there are few and small eggs in their chicken coop.
  32. +2
    11 January 2016 09: 46
    They Pts not badly with the Russians tear money in our country for the winter of 8 months a year and gas 4700 per thousand cubic meters. There is a mine. But it is unprofitable to take gas from it. But what about Miller and Co.
  33. +2
    11 January 2016 09: 57
    If Gazprom is not interested in domestic consumption in Russia, then it’s time to consider transferring Gazprom’s leadership to Europe and completely (or rather, somewhere to the north in Russia), why does our country need a company that is parasitic to resources and is not interested in Russia and its people - whether we are alive here or not - just pump gas from here .. You need to do something with such a company. Especially if you take into account how many problems Russia could have avoided - removing all these gas conflicts, which by and large are the result of ill-conceived contracts of company management such as Gazprom and the same politicians in the country's leadership. And in general, someone will explain what is the matter? Ukraine has already returned all the debts of Russia? And if Ukraine has not only not returned the old debts of Russia, but is also not going to return them no matter what .. and at the same time they are trying to trade with it ... and for the sake of whom, for the sake of Gazprom? The collapse of the ruble is another story altogether interesting article (how much you can believe in it is another question - although much seems to be true) http://cherkesk.monavista.ru/news/1314085/
    With such a ruble exchange rate and economic management - not only Gazprom will not be interested in building anything in the country, there will be little interesting for us in the future. Yes, and Ukraine has its own reasons to behave this way, because whatever they get up there is good for them with hands.
    1. 0
      11 January 2016 12: 59
      That's right, some football budgets are worth it. BUT the government began to cut Gazprom's unchecked income a bit.
  34. 0
    11 January 2016 10: 39
    he can call anything and anything, but you still have to pay
  35. +1
    11 January 2016 10: 42
    Where in Europe gas if they buy it there?
  36. 0
    11 January 2016 11: 07
    They will definitely throw off the price. "Our Ukrainian partners" is the most sacred thing for the Kremlin.
  37. 0
    11 January 2016 11: 11
    Bear with Senya! Soon masked will reduce the price! .... As always ...
  38. 0
    11 January 2016 11: 20
    It’s strange. Some kind of high price voiced.
  39. 0
    11 January 2016 13: 32
    Ukrainians ("every third") receive a subsidy for utility bills. It's lucky for people. And everyone complains about something and does not appreciate the state's concern for them.
  40. 0
    11 January 2016 15: 20
    Yaytsenyukh no longer knows how to spin. The orders are hard because of the puddles. Scary senka, creepy, that’s how it can be cast out. Lice on the crest.
  41. +2
    11 January 2016 22: 55
    I am sure Russia will reduce the price of gas for Poroshenko and his wretched people, and will raise us for mere mortals.