How a small NIS managed to harm NATO

13
It was in 1997 year. Our Murmansk research seismic survey vessel (let's call it Akademik Schastnyi) conducted a planned seismic survey in the Norwegian part of the North Sea. On the instructions of geologists and oilmen.

How a small NIS managed to harm NATO


It was at night. We lit the usual in such cases navigation lights (three white towing and red-white-red: the ship is limited in its ability to maneuver), the "tree", as the sailors say, and dragged their eight-kilometer long seismic vehicle behind the stern.

The scythe is a transparent gut with a diameter of 10-15 cm, on which sensors and other hydrographic equipment are located with an interval of approximately 200 meters. Immediately behind the stern of the vessel-seismic still very powerful pneumatic guns are located. The task of the guns is to shoot high pressure air into the bottom of the sea, the task of the sensors on the braids is to receive echoes reflected from the bottom. Based on the nature and structure of these echoes, scientists on board ship determine the size of oil and gas reservoirs on the seabed, if any.

When a seismic goes "on the profile" with a scythe, it usually does not give way to anyone, on the contrary, it warns all vessels to keep away from it. With a discreteness of approximately minutes in 30 in all known languages, we transmitted such warning messages on VHF radio station. The brief meaning of which: "Everyone is afraid and not to approach, but not that ..." Usually, all the vessels behaved accordingly. In addition to fishing. Fishermen to our complaints in the style of what we, say, have been doing seismic here for a year now, and it’s time to know about it, usually answered like this: "And we've been fishing here for thousands of years, and turned your seismic on our winches! "

This time we walked calmly along the profile until the lights of a suspicious vessel loomed ahead. Suspicious because also with the Christmas tree. Red-white-red ... Limited to maneuver. Perhaps the same seismic ... This is worse than fishermen!

I, the watch navigator, rushed to the ship's automatic identifier (AIS system). What the hell? Warship ... Warrior, and certainly NATO. He is rushing at me, surely he is plotting something against our submarines, or he is shooting, I am against him. Usually in such cases, someone alone must give way. Because the departure from the profile for seismic is a grave crime after losing the spit itself (worth millions in. E. e.). It is punished by many thousands of money for the company and the loss of the person for the shipmaster. However, if it were the same seismic, albeit an enemy one, I, perhaps, would have turned it off. But here - the adversary. The most that neither is! It works against us! And I, in all languages ​​known to me, including the abusive, began to drive the accursed imperialist out of the way.

As usual with NATO warriors, he does not respond, but rushing at me. Already visible silhouette in the night. The size of my "Academic", but certainly with machine guns! Against my emergency flares. But we are in vests! I decided: I will not give way to anything, until the collision will not go. Vrazhin already began to respond. And also not inferior, see, too, is afraid of losing his face ... He began to demand that I wake up the captain. And I say - the captain is resting, and I first started calling you - give in! If there was a day, we would have dealt with the enemy simply. They would have lowered the speedboat, drove past the side, read the name, and would have called it all over the North Sea using the secret name on board. Very NATO members do not like this, they even complain somewhere in Brussels about this. And we have a kind of sport. But here night, the boat you will not lower.

The NATO member almost implored him to miss it, but it went on principle, and I turned it off for order, of course, but not to ruin the profile, and the adversary had to completely interrupt his "profile" ... I can imagine how many millions of bucks we are their ministry of defense! I'm not talking about the loss of their NATO face ...
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    16 January 2016 07: 18
    From such "little things", as a result, VICTORIES are made!
    1. +3
      16 January 2016 09: 44
      Quote: PlotnikoffDD
      From such "little things", as a result, VICTORIES are made!

      And NATO members shaking off der..ma justify themselves saying "Crazy Russia". We are smart and turned away.
    2. +3
      16 January 2016 12: 14
      Quote: PlotnikoffDD
      From such "little things", as a result, VICTORIES are made!

      Yes, yes, something like this ...
    3. +1
      16 January 2016 18: 04
      However, then some Gorbachev with Shevarnadze will betray and sell all your victories ...
  2. 0
    16 January 2016 08: 33
    in the Norwegian part of the North Sea.

    In the territorial waters of Norway?
  3. +3
    16 January 2016 09: 44
    But how is the consumption of such vessels regulated, or is it considered impossible to meet two NIS at sea with Christmas trees ??
  4. 0
    16 January 2016 09: 58
    The stubbornness of ignorance triumphed.
  5. +2
    16 January 2016 13: 36
    The NATO watchman is probably now telling how he prevented the third world war, because under every Russian NIS there should be a dozen submarines hiding. wink
  6. 0
    16 January 2016 14: 24
    smiled article - thanks !!!! our Seaman - honor and praise! and military and not very! Sincerely Respect!
  7. 0
    16 January 2016 22: 32
    Funny story. And how would NATO members behave in the USSR?
  8. +2
    20 January 2016 16: 38
    Drunk nonsense! Read the conventions and the MPPSS - doubts will go away with a careful reading. I know the author. And he quit in 2000-2001 from us (seismicists). No military vessel displayed on AIS! This identification system is for commercial vessels only. In the Norwegian and North Sea, even a simple fisherman takes precedence over a seismic vessel, they have achieved this through the union, etc. About the boat and I will not explain, complete nonsense! There was nothing, fantasy. Or confused with a tanker in the fog and at night. But fantasy is on the top five!
    1. +1
      15 October 2016 07: 13
      “Good maritime practice” does not just exist, but is widely used even in the most demanding cases. Moreover, it is legalized by such an important international legal document as the COLREGs-72 (see rule 8a). The author is not familiar with this concept. In general, an unpleasant sensation, as from a pimply teenager on a nine, "showing off" on the road. Fu!
  9. -1
    13 November 2016 11: 35
    Lord, what nonsense the author wrote. "Hero" -aga. He almost created an emergency and is boasting. And if he had his "scythe" (as he writes, worth millions of dollars), this "warrior" grabbed him, then who would be to blame? And besides, in fact, he turned away, as he writes ("slightly"), in order to let the warrior pass and thus, in fact, or "ruined" the "profile" (as far as I know, a ship going along a seismic profile during seismic 2D should not deviate from the course more than 5 meters to the side) or made a "decent hole" in it, which must then be closed in any way, that is, again wasting time to enter it, etc. (and the client does not pay for this time), or maybe the whole profile needs to be redone after that, as the client on board says so it will be. "Hero", yeah.