Military Review

For 2, the paratroopers of the Tula and Novorossiysk units received 30 upgraded Strela-10МН air defense systems

54
In 2014-2015 In the Tula and Novorossiysk connections, more than 30 of the Strela-10MN complexes arrived, the press service reported. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


For 2, the paratroopers of the Tula and Novorossiysk units received 30 upgraded Strela-10МН air defense systems


“The mobile (floating) Strela-10MN” air defense missile system has the capability of effective night autonomous sector search and destruction of air targets, as well as equipped with modern reconnaissance facilities, ”the release says

It is reported that "the upgraded complexes are designed to conduct reconnaissance and destruction of various aircraft, cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles at low and ultra-low altitudes."

“Enhanced Strela-10MN SAM with enhanced capabilities and compact low-altitude radar target detectors combined with the automated control system Barnaul-T will provide effective cover for ground assault operations, notifying in advance about the approaching air targets,” the press service noted.

In May last year, Vladimir Slobodchikov, director of the design bureau of precision engineering, reported that by 2016 the Defense Ministry would receive a total of 72 upgraded Strela-10MN (night) complex. He explained then that "we are talking about the improvement of the already existing air defense systems."
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ded100
    ded100 9 January 2016 11: 34 New
    +4
    Good news!! good
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 9 January 2016 11: 40 New
      11
      Quote: ded100
      Good news!! good

      The news is good, the military-industrial complex is working!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 9 January 2016 11: 47 New
        +9
        Quote: vlad66
        MIC works!

        Would you leave such a comment in sathya about the economy wink
        1. Homo
          Homo 9 January 2016 14: 13 New
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Would you leave such a comment in sathya about the economy

          There is one BUT! "Economy" is thanks to ..., and "armament" is contrary to ...! Therefore, weapons will always be in spite of the state of the economy.
        2. Tor5
          Tor5 9 January 2016 14: 17 New
          +1
          Yes, this, of course, is great, there are no words, but it would be nice for the rest to catch up, and not only in the military sphere.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. avva2012
          avva2012 9 January 2016 14: 39 New
          +2
          MIC, without an economy? Wow! belay
      2. Vadivak
        Vadivak 9 January 2016 11: 48 New
        13
        Quote: vlad66
        Quote: ded100
        Good news!! good

        The news is good, the military-industrial complex is working!

        Already since 1976 smile They fought wherever possible, Angola, Iraqi dozens shot down the A-10, the last time eastern Ukraine
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 9 January 2016 11: 44 New
      23
      Quote: ded100
      Good news!! good

      The Strela-10MN anti-aircraft missile system (Strela-10M4) is a modernization of the Strela-10M, Strela-10M2, and Strela-10M3 air defense systems. The modernization project was prepared by JSC Design Bureau of Precision Engineering named after A.E. Nudelman ". Designed to protect military units in various forms of battle and on the march from air attack and reconnaissance, diving and flying at low and very low altitudes. The new version of "Strela-10MN" (night) has the ability to night autonomous sector search and target detection. It can work at night due to the introduction of an autonomous sector search and target detection, ”said Gordeev.
      A special device automatically detects the target, sends a command to the operator, the operator captures the target and fires.
      Features:
      Armament 8 pcs. SAM 9M333 (9M37M, 9M37MD)
      Rocket mass in flight / in TPK, kg 41/72
      Caliber rocket, mm: 120
      Guidance System: Homing
      Zones of destruction, km:
      range 0,8 - 5,0
      height 0,01 - 3,5
      The speed of the hit targets, m / s about 420.
      The interference counteraction is high, including modern powerful optical interference, regardless of the method of their formulation.
      The ability to work at night and in adverse weather conditions is provided.
      Reload time: min 10,0.
      Operating modes: autonomous and with centralized management.
      1. Hey
        Hey 9 January 2016 12: 26 New
        0
        Zones of destruction, km:
        range 0,8 - 5,0
        height 0,01 - 3,5
        The speed of the hit targets, m / s about 420.


        I hope that the modernization touched not only the complex itself but also its missiles. Let there be a surprise for the adversaries.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 9 January 2016 12: 42 New
          13
          Quote: MUD
          I hope that the modernization touched not only the complex itself but also its missiles. Let there be a surprise for the adversaries.

          It is hard to say request There was information about the new SAM 9M333, for "Arrows-10". Compared to the 9M37 missiles, which was discontinued 25 years ago, it uses a more efficient engine and a new GOS, which has three operating modes, in addition to infrared and photo contrast, there is an interference mode. The autopilot provides more stable operation of the seeker and the missile control loop. Increased the probability of hitting targets due to an increase in the warhead.
          1. 31rus
            31rus 9 January 2016 13: 31 New
            +1
            Added the ability to "work" on the counter courses
      2. Lex.
        Lex. 9 January 2016 13: 41 New
        +7
        defeats, km:
        range 0,8 - 5,0
        height 0,01 - 3,5
        These TTH and MANPADS willow provides which is more compact
        1. Artyom
          Artyom 9 January 2016 13: 55 New
          +1
          at night and in cloudy weather, willow is not so effective, but the radar is on the arrow!
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 9 January 2016 13: 58 New
            +1
            Quote: Artyom
            at night and in cloudy weather, willow is not so effective, but the radar is on the arrow!

            Really? no In which place?
          2. Lex.
            Lex. 9 January 2016 18: 09 New
            +1
            This radar can play a cruel joke with a detection range that is small and even reveals itself once again
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 10 January 2016 02: 58 New
              +5
              Quote: Lex.
              This radar can play a cruel joke with a detection range that is small and even reveals itself once again

              No radar on the "Arrow-10" and never was no Unfortunately, the low level of knowledge does not allow some website visitors to distinguish between a "radar" and a radar range finder. The range finder provided the determination of the range to already visually detected targets (within 430-10000 meters, with an accuracy of up to 100 meters) and the radial speed of the target (maximum error - 30 meters per second), people who are ignorant often take it for the radar as its parabolic antenna. In addition, the platoon commander’s machine has a passive radiation recording station for aircraft radio systems.
              1. Lex.
                Lex. 10 January 2016 19: 21 New
                +1
                Well, you won’t know everything
            2. Aleksey_K
              Aleksey_K 11 January 2016 12: 35 New
              +1
              Quote: Lex.
              This radar can play a cruel joke with a detection range that is small and even reveals itself once again

              The aircraft has a combat mission and limited ammunition. Waste on these cars, the tanks will remain intact and break through the defenses, or the arrows with Verba will survive. So everything on the battlefield is interconnected and limited by ammunition. Not in vain, after all, fighters always take ammunition many times higher than the standard. But the plane cannot do that.
        2. avva2012
          avva2012 9 January 2016 14: 48 New
          +3
          These TTH and MANPADS willow provides which is more compact
          The mass of the rocket is 9M37, more than 40 kilo. Schwarzenegger and that will not pull.
          1. Basarev
            Basarev 9 January 2016 15: 04 New
            -16
            Well, who needs this ancient MANPADS on a wagon that only protects from SVD? First of all, the country needs the latest strategic air defense systems like Triumph or C-500. And all sorts of dwarfs such as Arrows, Tunguska and Shell for wimps.
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 9 January 2016 15: 10 New
              +8
              Quote: Basarev
              Well, who needs this ancient MANPADS on a wagon that only protects from SVD? First of all, the country needs the latest strategic air defense systems like Triumph or C-500. And all sorts of dwarfs such as Arrows, Tunguska and Shell for wimps.

              Are you joking or serious?
            2. avva2012
              avva2012 9 January 2016 15: 11 New
              +3
              The longer I live, the more I am surprised at how much everything was thought out by the USSR. I think not in vain, "this wagon" appeared, so it was necessary. And, this, without even going into the tactics and strategy of the armed forces.
              1. looker-on
                looker-on 12 January 2016 01: 13 New
                0
                Especially the cars we got in the USSR. Oh, I’m lying, everyone copied from the Packards (Volga 21) and from fiat (a penny ... we think until the release of vases 2105-07 in the current decade is stopped). Due to the fact that VPC gave us fantastic models of technology, the entire population of the USSR for years stood in line for the Muscovite. If I impudently lie the invoice of the truth. The auto industry is just an example. Ready to bring a lot of them.

                And if without enthusiasm, then let us have tanks and planes will be in the top 20 of the world, but at the same time the standard of living of ordinary people will be in the Top 10. And do not about the fact that these Tops are directly interconnected. Canada, for example, is a very large country. There are few people. The army is not so wow, but people do not live badly. Not bad at all.
            3. Dam
              Dam 9 January 2016 16: 14 New
              +4
              Fools in Russia 100 years in stock
              1. sharp-lad
                sharp-lad 9 January 2016 19: 54 New
                +2
                Unfortunately, millennia pass, and fools around the world never end. request
              2. LÄRZ
                LÄRZ 10 January 2016 02: 49 New
                +2
                And how many roads?
            4. Anton56
              Anton56 9 January 2016 21: 58 New
              +1
              potential opponents have the best in their military air defense - the same MANPADS on the wagon (I exaggerate a little)
          2. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 9 January 2016 20: 00 New
            +3
            Quote: Lex.
            This radar can play a cruel joke with a detection range that is small and even reveals itself once again
            You miss the “Barnaul-T”, which is associated with the “Arrows” and stands in a hierarchy above them. In addition, compact radar posts significantly increase stealth and efficiency in general.
        3. Aleksey_K
          Aleksey_K 11 January 2016 12: 27 New
          0
          Quote: Lex.
          defeats, km:
          range 0,8 - 5,0
          height 0,01 - 3,5
          These TTH and MANPADS willow provides which is more compact

          We need different options, because the infantryman is very susceptible to fragmentation at the battlefield. This vehicle can advance behind infantry and provide air cover. In addition, as you probably already guessed. The infantryman can only shoot at the track of a used aircraft (if he survives), and the machine is equipped with radar and the shot is fired at a target that has not yet reached the battlefield.
  2. SklochPensioner
    SklochPensioner 9 January 2016 11: 47 New
    +2
    May a grain of doubt and ... fear fall in their (sashnikov) minds am

    "... have the ability to effectively nightly autonomous sector search and destruction of air targets, as well as equipped with modern intelligence tools"

    And yes, the news is great!
  3. gg.na
    gg.na 9 January 2016 12: 03 New
    +1
    So the airborne assault rifle was modernized! good I am very happy about this news! drinks yes
  4. Papapg
    Papapg 9 January 2016 12: 04 New
    +7
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: vlad66
    MIC works!
    Would you leave such a comment in sathya about the economy

    Such a comment should try to put the banking system with their interest on loans. Not the banking system, but moneylenders with the beastly face of capitalism. So I can’t understand this, why beat a collective farm bull in the testicles in order to expect more milk from a cow?
  5. Bongo
    Bongo 9 January 2016 12: 06 New
    10
    For 2, the paratroopers of the Tula and Novorossiysk units received 30 upgraded Strela-10МН air defense systems

    Another issue is that these Strela-10MN air defense systems cannot cover airborne units after parachuting. As you know, the base for Strela-10 is MT-LB, this tracked vehicle, with all its advantages, has never been dumped using parachute systems. In the past, the air defense of the paratroopers was carried out by the ZU-23 installed BTR-D (pictured) and MANPADS.
  6. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 9 January 2016 12: 29 New
    +7
    In two years, thirty cars, if not many, hundreds of them have remained in service since the Soviet era, and not all of them correspond to the realities of modern combat. Many of these are simply preserved and, in practical use, their effectiveness will be very low.
  7. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 9 January 2016 12: 38 New
    +2
    The system is good, but it is outdated. I need a replacement for the Pine.
  8. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 9 January 2016 12: 56 New
    +1
    Why not Pine? Of course, "Strel" has been released a lot, they are constantly being upgraded, that's good, but it's time to switch to the new system, especially the paratroopers. At present, Strela can easily be replaced even by Verba MANPADS.
  9. In search
    In search 9 January 2016 12: 56 New
    0
    Oh yes .. 30 cars on the territory of 17 125 407 km² are POWER. We’ll tear it to rest, laying down it! What are the squeals of joy? This amount for our country is 0.
    1. Moore
      Moore 9 January 2016 19: 29 New
      +3
      Why these antics about the territory?
      Do you imagine the use of these machines by installing them in every village toilet or, after all, as a cover for subunits and units of the airborne forces in their areas of operation?
  10. spolo
    spolo 9 January 2016 13: 27 New
    +1
    Hornet boom work

    Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBWcsJxiLqk
  11. 31rus
    31rus 9 January 2016 13: 28 New
    +3
    Dear, I have a question, what’s the purpose of the landing? MTL-B is correctly noted, it’s not suitable for landing from airplanes, besides the problem is the “Arrow” helicopters operating from a jump, if not landing, then why not the “Shell” on the tracked chassis , another option to build on BTR-D, while the “Shell”, will be launched, and this only complicates the logistics
    1. 2k11
      2k11 9 January 2016 13: 46 New
      +3
      not quite on the topic, but still:
      many write, and why are they landing? supposedly not suitable for landing ...

      And when over the past 50 years, our airborne troops were used for their intended purpose? What are the landing forces used when and when?
      1. Bongo
        Bongo 9 January 2016 13: 57 New
        +5
        Quote: 2k11
        many write, and why are they landing? supposedly not suitable for landing ...

        Excuse me, why then do you need a special airborne special equipment? what Let's equip the paratroopers with much more protected main tanks, the same as the BTR and BMP motorized rifles, self-propelled howitzers on a caterpillar track. Nothing that it’s all impossible to drop from military transport planes, because paratroopers do not jump with a parachute in combat conditions. request
        1. 2k11
          2k11 9 January 2016 14: 02 New
          +3
          Quote: Bongo
          paratroopers, after all, do not jump with a parachute in combat conditions.

          In my opinion, most likely amateurish, but nevertheless having the right to life, a look:
          the main task of the landing: landing in the landing method, and for this, "Arrow-10" and the Armor are quite suitable.
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 9 January 2016 14: 05 New
            +6
            Quote: 2k11
            In my opinion, most likely amateurish, but nevertheless having the right to life, a look:
            the main task of the landing: landing in the landing method, and for this, "Arrow-10" and the Armor are quite suitable.

            Certainly suitable, but motorized units are also suitable for landing. Just not the fact that where there is an urgent need to deploy troops there will be suitable airfields for this.
  12. Vladycat
    Vladycat 9 January 2016 14: 02 New
    +5
    30 cars at 17 million km2. Fine. Airborne does not perform the functions of air defense of the country. Yes, it does not land, but provided that the enemy airfield is captured by an advanced landing force, it is delivered by aircraft to strengthen the defense. People before criticizing. You can think a little. We do not have the time now when you can swing swords. Modernization is going as planned, I hope in that quantity.
    1. 31rus
      31rus 9 January 2016 14: 16 New
      +2
      Dear, the weak point of the Strela complex is helicopters in hop mode, the absence of a standard radar, the speed of the complex’s reaction, there is a Pantsir, there will soon be a Pine, and you need to work in this direction rather than PR and not spend budget money
      1. TOR2
        TOR2 9 January 2016 15: 58 New
        +4
        Quote: 31rus
        Dear, the weak point of the Strela complex is helicopters in jumping mode, the absence of a standard radar, and a high reaction rate

        To detect such a hazard, an acoustic channel is also required. SAM does not emit anything, this is a very good surprise for what flies. The reaction time is reduced due to the use of a more advanced elemental base and the creation of additional channels. But it will be another complex.
        1. 31rus
          31rus 9 January 2016 19: 02 New
          -1
          Dear TOR2, thermal guidance heads used on missiles do not give this complex any chance, if only an ambush in possible areas, and even after the first launch, will be noticed and destroyed, in the extreme case, upgrade for installation on any car such as a pickup truck, trailer make remotely controlled from one post to 6-8 launchers, and even then this is enough to cover "not closed zones", amplifications, additions to already formed echelons
      2. ivanovich
        ivanovich 9 January 2016 17: 32 New
        0
        there is only a passive radar, there’s no sense from it anyway because ZR guidance is conducted only through the optical channel i.e. you need to see the goal with your own eyes, if the Pine is with the same technical flaws, then this is really a waste of budget money
  13. Zomanus
    Zomanus 9 January 2016 14: 13 New
    0
    "The dog jumps on the bitch, and the paratroopers make the jumps."
    And then, this machine can go in a convoy and on the move to serve as a cover.
    A landing is not necessarily from the air.
    1. 31rus
      31rus 9 January 2016 14: 48 New
      +6
      Dear Hellfire missile, has a launch range of 8 km, and it is already armed with a UAV, the question is, who needs this modernization?
      1. Dam
        Dam 9 January 2016 16: 17 New
        +1
        Didn’t you hear that Cubans already had it? It seems that all is no longer writing about it. Therefore, you can write off already Hellfires.
  14. Leader
    Leader 9 January 2016 15: 13 New
    +5
    How much can the Soviet legacy be exploited?
    Maybe you need to sell any obsolete equipment abroad, and with the money raised, carry out R&D and prepare the production?
    Especially if the equipment is for disposal. Just give it to someone - and then it will cost less.
    By the way, I would gladly accept the T-55 tank, for example, as a private person for safekeeping. I like this simple "soldier" battleship ...
    It will take the Motherland - I will give: painted, served, in readiness.
    Do not need it - let it stand in my cottage under a canopy.
    1. ivanovich
      ivanovich 9 January 2016 17: 23 New
      +2
      Maybe you need to sell any obsolete equipment abroad, and with the money raised, carry out R&D and prepare the production?


      The right thought! I served as an operator-gunner on Strela 10M, this machine was good for the 80s, partly 90s, but now it is absolutely outdated, the crew has no chance to survive against the attack helicopter, these are suicide bombers. It is necessary to arm the army with Torahs and Shells, and not to restore this junk.
  15. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 9 January 2016 17: 14 New
    0
    On the basis of this shaitan-arba, do their death machines svidomye? :) Putting three suspensions for NURSES on this chassis. It’s called “I won’t get it, so at least scare” :)
  16. From Samara
    From Samara 9 January 2016 17: 44 New
    0
    Airborne would be nice to have your own fleet ...
  17. From Samara
    From Samara 9 January 2016 17: 45 New
    0
    Also, the Airborne Forces would be nice to form their Anti-Terrorism Unit like the British CAC ...
  18. Yak28
    Yak28 9 January 2016 17: 56 New
    +1
    Arrows need to be assembled in Russia and donated to Syria and Iran, and not supplied in part. Not for 25 years, Russian designers have come up with nothing better than the Soviet Arrow-10, developed in 1973. All that can be squeezed out of it. to develop new systems, new weapons. I honestly thought that they had long been removed from service laughing
    1. TOR2
      TOR2 9 January 2016 23: 19 New
      +1
      Of course, we need a new ultra-short-range complex. Apparently, such a SAM, in addition to classic targets, will have to fight with UAVs, and even the smallest. And this means in addition you will need a laser locator, an optics detector, a microwave module. Let's see if it will be implemented on the "Pine".
  19. lilian
    lilian 9 January 2016 21: 26 New
    0
    30 pieces is enough?