Military Review

American admiral: the Russian Federation and the PRC challenged the fleet of the United States

113
US Navy Commander John Richardson has published a plan of large-scale events that should help the American the fleet maintain superiority in the oceans, reports RIA News.




The document, titled “Naval Excellence Project,” notes that over the past 25 years, America has for the first time been faced with rivalry from large states.

“Russia and China have improved their military capabilities, allowing them to act as world powers. Their goals are supported by a growing arsenal of high-level weapons, many of which are focused on our vulnerabilities, ”writes the admiral.

"They continue to develop and deliver to the troops weapon on the basis of information technologies, both kinetic and non-kinetic, with an increased range, accuracy and destructive power, ”he points out.

“The Russian Navy operates regularly, including in those regions of the world where it has not been visible for almost two decades,” Richardson notes. “The Chinese fleet is also expanding its presence around the world.”

In order to maintain superiority, the commander-in-chief proposed to act in the 4 directions.

First, to continue "strengthening US naval power, including the modernization of strategic submarines, the development of means of information warfare, and the creation of new weapon systems."

Secondly, “to achieve high rates of education at all levels”.

Thirdly, “pay special attention to the motivation of the staff”.

Fourth, "strengthen cooperation with partners of the US Navy."

He further stressed that "the US Navy will remain the best navy in the world only if they fight every minute for their superiority."

“Our rivals have focused on taking the lead, but we must accelerate the pace and prevent them. The advantage is minimal, but it is decisive, ”Richardson concluded.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
113 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 7 January 2016 09: 03 New
    33
    No way Americans can abandon the idea of ​​superiority over others, American exclusivity. Anyway, in my opinion, sooner or later the end of American hegemony will come.
    1. vlad66
      vlad66 7 January 2016 09: 10 New
      21
      Quote: avvg
      No way Americans can abandon the idea of ​​American exclusivity.

      Yes, let the best be strangled by their exclusivity. Asks for money. Yes, more hoopoe.
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 7 January 2016 09: 34 New
        18
        Quote: vlad66
        He asks for money. Yes, more hoopoe.

        Let him go to the panel to beg, and let him take this ram. fellow
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 7 January 2016 12: 29 New
          +6
          Quote: vovanpain
          Let him go to the panel to beg.

          laughing , Typically, alms are asked on the porch, and on the panel they earn what is known and how. So in his guest workers in Amsterdam on the red light district wink
      2. dr.Bo
        dr.Bo 7 January 2016 11: 04 New
        +5
        An exceptional nation with a monkey at the head. Cool.
      3. iConst
        iConst 7 January 2016 13: 06 New
        +3
        Quote: vlad66
        Quote: avvg
        No way Americans can abandon the idea of ​​American exclusivity.

        Yes let better be strangled by their exclusivity. Money asks. yes more hoopoe.
        “That is their Achilles' heel.”
        Their main lever for controlling the whole World is financial and economic.
        But until they were sent to the farm ... And for those especially greyhounds naughty - already a military club.

        But it should be thicker than all the other clubs taken together.

        If Russia and China strengthen the fleet, then in order to achieve overwhelming superiority, the United States will have to increase strength.
        Already, they understand that they simply will not pull quantitatively - if the budget is reduced, this will lead to collapse: they will have to choose what to reduce: the army or the social network.

        Therefore, the United States is now looking for ways to dominate: global strikes, lasers, rail guns ...
        There is a search for a method of how to get on a Christmas tree and not to rip off zep.
        Those. how to pile on everyone cheaply and angrily.
      4. cap
        cap 7 January 2016 13: 44 New
        +2
        Quote: vlad66
        Quote: avvg
        No way Americans can abandon the idea of ​​American exclusivity.

        Yes, let the best be strangled by their exclusivity. Asks for money. Yes, more hoopoe.

        I completely agree with you. Recently appointed. Money is needed. We need it.
        Here are the numbers for the fleets. More here: http: //flot.com/nowadays/structure/techreadiness/2014/

        According to the State Armaments Program for 2010-2011 (GPV-2020) adopted at the end of 2020, it is envisaged to allocate more than 20 trillion rubles for the development of the army and navy, including the construction of 50 surface ships, 8 strategic submarine carriers and 20 submarines Up to 80 auxiliary fleet ships. Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that by the end of 2015, the Navy will receive eight warships and 2 submarines. However, according to some reports, the costs of building new warships and auxiliary fleet ships will be cut.
        Combat capabilities of the Russian Navy and US Navy 2014
        US Navy US Navy

        Personnel 143000 322000 + reserve 124000
        Name
        classes and subclasses of warships of the Russian Navy
        Payroll, units Weight,
        conv. units US Navy
        Payroll, units Weight,
        conv. units
        Total 216
        Ratio 92,31% 51,73% 100% 100%

        Auxiliary fleet (not taken into account in the general calculation

        Ratio 117,59% 71,09% 100% 100%

        The obvious simplicity of the calculation yielded results that made it possible to understand the acute public concern about the state of our fleet.
        That something like this. hi
        1. cap
          cap 7 January 2016 14: 26 New
          0
          Quote: cap
          The obvious simplicity of the calculation yielded results that made it possible to understand the acute public concern about the state of our fleet.
          Something like that. hi

          The tablet crookedly stood up, I apologize. It is better to go to the footnote, there is very detailed.
    2. demo
      demo 7 January 2016 09: 31 New
      +8
      History says that the Empires, even the most powerful, and seemed to be eternal, are coming to an end.
      Either fast, with a crash of destruction, or slow, seeming a normal forward movement.

      All will pass. It will pass.

      Motivation is great.
      That's just the motivation to plant "democracy" and its "maintenance" is one thing, and the motivation to defend your life ideology is completely different.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 7 January 2016 10: 07 New
        +3
        Quote: demo
        Motivation is great.

        In their understanding, motivation is an increase in the monetary allowance of the staff, and this is an increase in the military budget, which is what the military lobby is seeking.
      2. Bennert
        Bennert 7 January 2016 10: 11 New
        +7
        American admiral: the Russian Federation and the PRC challenged the fleet of the United States

        Not funny

        Americans have more warships in the ocean zone, than all countries of the world combined. 11 atomic aircraft carriers and 9 helicopter carriers, 72 nuclear submarines, 85 cruisers and destroyers, over 3000 aircraft units.

        The quality gap is even greater most US Navy ships simply have no analogues in the Old World. Giant floating airfields, Aegis system, naval patrol drones, 45 nodal frigates LCS, submarines carrying cruise missiles on 150 ...


        Navy Norfolk - 17 kilometers of moorings with cruisers and aircraft carriers

        What side is the Russian Navy here? Where are his new ships? How is it compared with the American and Chinese fleets?
        1. Jozhkin Cat
          Jozhkin Cat 7 January 2016 11: 16 New
          +7
          However, they will burn beautifully ...
          Straight for ,, Status 6 ,, goal repeat
          1. Bennert
            Bennert 7 January 2016 11: 30 New
            0
            Quote: Jozhkin the Cat
            Straight for ,, Status 6 ,, goal

            Marine Strategic Nuclear Forces (SNLF) - an extremely formidable tool, the probability of which does not have a clear answer. NSLF guarantee the sovereignty of the state, at the same time do not give anything in domestic international conflictsConventional Weapons.

            Where is the Russian and Chinese counterpart of the Ohio with 150 tomahawks?
            1. Jozhkin Cat
              Jozhkin Cat 7 January 2016 11: 37 New
              +5
              Do you still believe that war between nuclear countries will be waged by convection weapons? 15 minutes, yes, until the orders for the units pass
              1. Bennert
                Bennert 7 January 2016 11: 43 New
                -4
                Quote: Jozhkin the Cat
                Do you still believe that war between nuclear countries will be waged by convection weapons?

                1. Yes, there is a high probability that the war between the nuclear powers will be fought without nuclear weapons or its limited use in a tactical version, without use in large settlements.

                Reason: lack of desire to die among the powerful.
                Proof: all the calculations and doctrines of the Cold War, as well as the composition of the fleets of both superpowers (a huge number of escort ships to escort convoys to Europe, and multipurpose submarines from the Soviet side)

                2. In addition to war with each other, super fleets can have dozens of other tasks - from control of oil supplies from the Persian Gulf to missile attacks on Isil. And it is completely unclear how to solve them in the absence of ships
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. gjv
                  gjv 7 January 2016 12: 06 New
                  +4
                  Quote: BENNERT
                  from control of oil supplies from the Persian Gulf to missile attacks on Isil. And it is completely unclear how to solve them in the absence of ships

                  It is perfectly clear that these are gangster tasks carried out by the United States of bandera.
                  Quote: BENNERT
                  Tomahawks have been in service since 1983.

                  USA - Bandit railway station the state from the day it was founded to this day ...
                  1. Jozhkin Cat
                    Jozhkin Cat 7 January 2016 17: 23 New
                    +4
                    United States banderika.
                3. Mavrikiy
                  Mavrikiy 8 January 2016 07: 13 New
                  +2
                  Dear, do not tell tales of a future dream, about the limited use of nuclear weapons and the Cold War. The Caribbean crisis has not taught you anything? What tactical nuclear weapons are there? You would really like everything in theory. No friends, "let’s blow this way, the whole world is in ruin, but then." By the way, watch more of our films, this is not for studying culture, but for understanding the mentality of the enemy. And do not spoil your eyes by compiling mind-sets that are not worth paper.
            2. DenZ
              DenZ 7 January 2016 12: 25 New
              +1
              Marine Strategic Nuclear Forces (SNLF) is an extremely formidable instrument, the probability of which does not have a clear answer. NSLF guarantee the sovereignty of the state, at the same time they do not give anything in domestic international conflicts waged by conventional weapons.

              Where is the Russian and Chinese counterpart of the Ohio with 150 tomahawks?

              So, dear, boats of class SSGN (such as Ohio with tomahawks) do not belong to the NSLF! Learn materiel! But still, if now we do not have such, this does not mean that there will not be in 4-5 years.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. Major Yurik
              Major Yurik 7 January 2016 12: 36 New
              +8
              Quote: BENNERT
              Quote: Jozhkin the Cat
              Straight for ,, Status 6 ,, goal

              Marine Strategic Nuclear Forces (SNLF) - an extremely formidable tool, the probability of which does not have a clear answer. NSLF guarantee the sovereignty of the state, at the same time do not give anything in domestic international conflictsConventional Weapons.

              Where is the Russian and Chinese counterpart of the Ohio with 150 tomahawks?


              I understand your awe for the Yankeeps, but superiority in anything, especially in the number of pieces of the ships of the navy, is quickly leveled by effective means of destroying them, especially by little-known enemy.
              There are two ways to control the harvest on the collective farm field, a militarized mobile group armed to the teeth with bases and allies (this is when you print grandmother yourself), or dense mining of a field with surprises and shooting any crap dangling with weapons around. The choice is provided! hi
            5. vlad66
              vlad66 7 January 2016 16: 34 New
              10
              Quote: BENNERT
              Quote: Jozhkin the Cat
              Straight for ,, Status 6 ,, goal

              Marine Strategic Nuclear Forces (SNLF) - an extremely formidable tool, the probability of which does not have a clear answer. NSLF guarantee the sovereignty of the state, at the same time do not give anything in domestic international conflictsConventional Weapons.

              Where is the Russian and Chinese counterpart of the Ohio with 150 tomahawks?

              We do not accidentally surrender. Can we kneel? Can't wait.
            6. Mavrikiy
              Mavrikiy 8 January 2016 06: 59 New
              +2
              Well, let’s wish more Ohio with 150 Tamahawks put into operation. Yes, 100 junks are not equal to a destroyer. But so far it has no cruise missile, at least one on it. Asymmetric answers were not invented yesterday, and the race for the symmetrical Navy remained in history.
          2. In search
            In search 7 January 2016 13: 49 New
            -2
            Jozhkin Kot "They will burn beautifully, however ..."

            What are you going to set fire to? 5 boats of 4 pcs. Gauges on each?
          3. Nosgoth
            Nosgoth 8 January 2016 07: 17 New
            +3
            Hat-taker? Oh well
        2. Boris55
          Boris55 7 January 2016 11: 38 New
          +4
          Quote: BENNERT
          Americans have more warships in the ocean zone than all countries of the world combined. 11 atomic carriers and 9 helicopter carriers, 72 nuclear submarines, 85 cruisers and destroyers, over 3000 aircraft units.

          And we have the "Caliber" in the air, on land, at sea and under water. And against aviation C-300, C-400, C-500 apart from everything else. We are not aggressors, we don’t need so much “iron”!
          1. Bennert
            Bennert 7 January 2016 11: 44 New
            +1
            Quote: Boris55
            And we have the "Caliber" in the air, on land, at sea and under water.

            Zapl entire Caspian flotilla = half the salvo of one American destroyer

            Tomahawks have been in service since 1983.
            1. Boris55
              Boris55 7 January 2016 12: 11 New
              0
              Quote: BENNERT
              The volley of the entire Caspian flotilla ...

              By this, do you mean the 3 of the tiny boat you are trying to hit? That's the American destroyer - how you gave so soon a kirtyk to two fleets. laughing

              About cruise missiles in the USSR "Work on ramjet and long-range cruise missiles
              with ramjet in the USSR (1947-1960) ": http://astronaut.ru/bookcase/books/evstafiev/text/10.htm
              1. Bennert
                Bennert 8 January 2016 00: 41 New
                +2
                Quote: Boris55
                3 tiny boat which torment to hit?

                Small rocket ship pr. 21631
                length - 74 meters

                Arly Burke missile destroyer:
                length - 154 meters

                Not so small, 74 meters - like a 20-story house laid on its side
                torment getting
                Quote: Boris55
                That's the American destroyer - how did you give a kick to two fleets so immediately

                The destroyer has air defense and missile defense

                mrk has nothing
            2. Diana Ilyina
              Diana Ilyina 7 January 2016 12: 27 New
              15
              Quote: BENNERT
              Zapl entire Caspian flotilla = half the salvo of one American destroyer
              Tomahawks have been in service since 1983.


              We understood you, “we’re thinking,” America is the main thing and to fight with it a-ta-ta nizyayaya! Just see, dear, the Wehrmacht in 1941 was the most powerful military machine on the planet, and how did it help him ?! I can give you dozens of examples when the enemies of Russia were so stronger than hers that the defeat of Russia seemed inevitable to everyone, but this did not save them from defeat! So put your exclusive fleet in the place where Makar did not drive calves!
            3. Tersky
              Tersky 7 January 2016 12: 41 New
              +6
              Quote: BENNERT
              Zapl entire Caspian flotilla = half the salvo of one American destroyer

              I wonder what will remain of the American destroyer after half of the ash barrage ...
              1. Atrix
                Atrix 8 January 2016 12: 45 New
                -1
                Quote: Tersky
                I wonder what will remain of the American destroyer after half of the ash barrage ...

                What does this have to do with the article ??? A man is trying to tell you that a Russian fleet cannot even theoretically challenge the US fleet in the near future. And you immediately begin to write about "Ash", you still remember about biological weapons and chemical.
                1. gladcu2
                  gladcu2 8 January 2016 23: 41 New
                  -1
                  Atrix

                  Do not contradict.

                  The Fursenkov generation falls into the audience. For them, statements in the style of “Spartak Champion” are easier to understand. Yes, and an article in the same series.
            4. In search
              In search 7 January 2016 13: 54 New
              -9
              BENNERT US is the only adequate here. The rest are a bunch of "urakryaks" who are about to gather their bast shoes, apparently. Yes to us before their fleet - as to China with cancer.
              1. Jozhkin Cat
                Jozhkin Cat 7 January 2016 14: 51 New
                +1
                and you’ve already dug up a grave for yourself, right?))
                Before the army of the Wehrmacht, too, it was, far, .. ide that Wehrmacht now?
                and quantity is not always = quality, without a bold and professional team, even a spaceship will be just a target.
              2. NEXUS
                NEXUS 7 January 2016 16: 07 New
                +7
                Quote: In search
                Yes to us before their fleet - as to China with cancer.

                Our Navy has different tasks. You apparently forgot that the fifth of the land is Roosia, with a border of slightly less than 36 thousand km. And the land component of the army is important for us, which can’t be said about the United States. It’s because America is surrounded by oceans most of the military budget in the fleet.
                But this does not mean that our fleets are not able to solve the tasks that are set for them. After more than 20 years of collapse, everything has to be restored. And the hands of the fleet are slowly reaching. But you need to understand that the fleet is not a cheap pleasure.
                At the same time, the land part and the Strategic Missile Forces are an order of magnitude weaker than ours. So everything is very relative, dear.
                1. afdjhbn67
                  afdjhbn67 8 January 2016 07: 55 New
                  0
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  At the same time, the land part, and the Strategic Missile Forces are an order of magnitude weaker than ours

                  At this point, Andrew, intrigued the right word ..
                  Did not come across similar in your comments ..
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 8 January 2016 11: 29 New
                    +1
                    Quote: afdjhbn67

                    At this point, Andrew, intrigued the right word ..
                    Did not come across similar in your comments ..

                    And what is wrong with this moment?
                    When was the Minutemen last modified? Yes, we have parity in the number of carriers, but not in the quality and power of charges. We’ll include mobile systems that are not so easy to track and such missiles as Rubezh and Sarmat that are accepted for service. Do not forget about our ABM, this is the A-235, and S-400 (in the near future S-500), Shell C, and so on. That is, a layered missile defense, which the United States does not have.
                    And as regards the ground forces, so sorry, good soldiers cannot be obtained from mercenaries, since the incentive for such people is one-money (or a US citizen passport).
                    Once again, the United States spends most of its military budget on the fleet.
                    Best regards hi
              3. vlad66
                vlad66 7 January 2016 16: 10 New
                +9
                Quote: In search
                BENNERT US is the only adequate here. The rest are a bunch of "urakryaks" who are about to gather their bast shoes, apparently. Yes to us before their fleet - as to China with cancer.

                I didn’t forget to kiss the mattress’s ass with BENNERT. Politics, pah, even reading these nonsense is disgusting.
                1. tolian
                  tolian 7 January 2016 18: 11 New
                  0
                  Do not read. And to us, the rest. it will be nicer to talk to each other. Are you a strategist, tactician or just sober ..... Bandera, and Ulad?
                  1. vlad66
                    vlad66 7 January 2016 18: 35 New
                    +9
                    Quote: tolian
                    Do not read. And to us, the rest. it will be nicer to talk to each other. Are you a strategist, tactician or just sober ..... Bandera, and Ulad?

                    So you Tolian Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Do not want to read, you are a strategist, tactician, I hope sober .... not a banderlog, but Tolyan? hi
              4. gladcu2
                gladcu2 8 January 2016 23: 42 New
                -1
                In search

                Support.
            5. sherp2015
              sherp2015 7 January 2016 15: 10 New
              +3
              Quote: BENNERT
              Tomahawks have been in service since 1983.


              Probably rusted for so many years))
            6. vlad66
              vlad66 7 January 2016 16: 36 New
              11
              Quote: BENNERT

              Tomahawks have been in service since 1983.

              Yes, scared. fellow laughing
            7. NEXUS
              NEXUS 7 January 2016 18: 10 New
              +1
              Quote: BENNERT
              Zapl entire Caspian flotilla = half the salvo of one American destroyer

              So what? Compare destroyers with small ships ... very clever lol
              Then, for self-education, calculate how much power the entire nuclear missile arsenal is with us and the United States. I'm talking about power in TNT equivalent. And then let the bubbles go, dear.
            8. Talgat
              Talgat 7 January 2016 20: 40 New
              +2
              I must admit the reasonableness of Bennert's comments

              Truly world aggressors, printing dollars, robbing the whole world, concentrated huge resources

              The entire world economy works for them, including China and Russia.

              Hence the overwhelming superiority in the fleet. This is not surprising - the United States and the West (formerly England) are the civilization of the "sea" - and dominance at sea is their hobby

              But all the same, the USSR, being another incarnation of "land", still managed to challenge them with its own fleet. And now China will do it - wait years 15-20 and see
              1. gladcu2
                gladcu2 8 January 2016 23: 47 New
                0
                Talgat

                Bennet man is right. Mui Ne does not write.

                But the problem is that the United States is a little uncontrollable and often puts in turns, and therefore the problems with modern management methods are also solved through the Russian Federation and China.
        3. noWAR
          noWAR 7 January 2016 12: 22 New
          +6
          Quote: BENNERT
          Americans have more

          Are you under the table enjoying yourself wrong?
        4. tolian
          tolian 7 January 2016 18: 05 New
          +1
          Remember the comparison of the tanks and planes of the USSR and Germany in the 41st. And how we fled to Moscow. For 4 months. These 17 km of the pier with the fleet are doomed to a “bulky” from one Russian boat. And they know it well. And all articles of this type are written by admirals for the next fat soldering of the US Navy. Object. If you can.
        5. RDX
          RDX 7 January 2016 18: 58 New
          +1
          Due to the fact that the aircraft carrier needs a whole squadron of cover, a couple of missile destroyers will be turned into useless rubbish by an aircraft carrier group, I'm not talking about cruisers
        6. Mavrikiy
          Mavrikiy 8 January 2016 06: 50 New
          +1
          How, how. Do you know how scary or ugly he is. It was impossible not to mention. And then the threats are not enough for full funding.
      3. NIKNN
        NIKNN 7 January 2016 12: 10 New
        +8
        Secondly, “to achieve high rates of education at all levels”.

        Thirdly, “pay special attention to the motivation of the staff”.

        But they will have big problems with these points, since patriotism must be educated, not exclusive! request
      4. gladcu2
        gladcu2 8 January 2016 23: 37 New
        0
        demo

        The modern world has centralized management. Has already. All events are managed at 60-70%. Therefore, to say that history can have forecasting events is pointless. Until the complete legalization of the control center.

        And this will not happen in the near future. Because there is a confrontation of this centralization.

        Do you know chaos theory? This is a system of confrontation.
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 7 January 2016 13: 47 New
      +4
      Quote: avvg
      No way Americans can abandon the idea of ​​superiority over others, American exclusivity. Anyway, in my opinion, sooner or later the end of American hegemony will come.

      Mattresses are bending their line, trying to return everything to the format of a unipolar world. Therefore, such statements by the admiral are not news. Another question, and the most important, is how we and China will answer this. And here the question of strengthening, updating and modernizing the fleet is even more acute. there is already the adversary himself pushing us in the construction of new ships, the modernization of old and the development of promising surface and underwater systems.
      1. tolian
        tolian 7 January 2016 18: 13 New
        0
        Will not customize! He provokes to run after them.
    4. ser-pov
      ser-pov 8 January 2016 00: 35 New
      0
      Yeah! When a wrapped candy wrapper bends ..
    5. gladcu2
      gladcu2 8 January 2016 23: 30 New
      0
      avvg

      This is not the Americans can not, this is their military can not. They have their own sporting interest.
  2. svp67
    svp67 7 January 2016 09: 04 New
    10
    In short, the meaning of what was said is “Give more money” ... Than not Ponyakovsky
  3. OlegV
    OlegV 7 January 2016 09: 04 New
    28
    it's already in the blood ....
    1. Cananecat
      Cananecat 7 January 2016 10: 44 New
      +3
      It’s enough to support their opinion of their own superiority, and then just “break the template” wassat
  4. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 7 January 2016 09: 05 New
    13
    “Pay special attention to the motivation of staff”
    Guidelines created on the basis of personal impressions of the crew of "Donald Cook" ?! repeat
  5. dmi.pris
    dmi.pris 7 January 2016 09: 06 New
    +6
    Well, what are the fenders? Scratch the back of your head, a strong opponent has appeared .. This is not a "trifle in your pockets" ...
  6. Same lech
    Same lech 7 January 2016 09: 07 New
    +1
    US Navy Commander John Richardson Announces Large-Scale Events


    It would be interesting to look at this plan.
    Well, such statements by the US military are not new ... the desire to keep the whole EARTH ball in a fist is a stupid desire ... to explode from the strain.
  7. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 7 January 2016 09: 07 New
    +3
    “Our rivals have focused on taking the lead, but we must accelerate the pace and prevent them. The advantage is minimal, but it is decisive, ”Richardson concluded.
    If you didn’t crap everywhere you come, nobody would pay attention to you! But now more and more are piling up in the Pacific Ocean, and this is our garden, so sorry if that request
  8. Tusv
    Tusv 7 January 2016 09: 10 New
    +1
    "The US Navy will remain the best navy in the world only if every minute they fight for their superiority."

    And who is easy now? Nuna means nana. Without the construction of just three fleets can not do. Go ahead. And we, the peaceful container ships will put the clubs. Well, to build a couple more fleets for targets.
  9. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 7 January 2016 09: 13 New
    11
    Yes, this is complete crap, and you, colleagues, were delighted. Open on Yandex or Google comparative tables on the balance of forces, including in the Navy, and you will understand what I mean. We still have to work and work to begin to step on their heels. Gradually, but steadily.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 7 January 2016 09: 35 New
      +6
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      We still have to work and work

      We then, of course, work. But the fact that they were worried suggests that not everything is going smoothly with them, as they would like.
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 7 January 2016 09: 36 New
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Open on Yandex or Google comparative tables on the balance of forces, including in the Navy, and you will understand what I mean.

      From Onyx, their heels are not yet protected. And thank God.
      Not so terrible 7 American fleets, as their submarines.
      1. ver_
        ver_ 7 January 2016 09: 45 New
        +3
        ... Damn not so terrible as his little ones ..
    3. Amurets
      Amurets 7 January 2016 09: 48 New
      +5
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Yes, this is complete crap, and you, colleagues, were delighted. Open on Yandex or Google comparative tables on the balance of forces, including in the Navy, and you will understand what I mean.

      Yes, and so it is clear. From January 04.01.2016, 01.02.2016 to February XNUMX, XNUMX, a budget is proposed for the next fiscal year, so you need to grab a piece fatter. Therefore, all the US military began to have problems with training, arming and superiority of the DPRK army and Easter Island over the US armed forces .
    4. tolian
      tolian 7 January 2016 18: 18 New
      +1
      We will not “step” on their heels. We are on our way. And, as always, unexpected.
  10. Neophyte
    Neophyte 7 January 2016 09: 18 New
    +2
    Partnership with the US Navy? The "rubber" fleet of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia is just right! And if, from midshipman Nechiporenko pick up the stolen batteries, then the famous "thunderstorm of the seas and oceans" will float - Zaporozhye!
  11. Sasha75
    Sasha75 7 January 2016 09: 28 New
    +1
    They walk on strangers print as much as necessary and correctly do any in their place looked at all from high, and we on our own here is the whole conversation. Honest, but not rich.
  12. North
    North 7 January 2016 09: 33 New
    +2
    everything in their repertoire. rehearsing for beads on the Indians with this tactic and live. and the whole world for pieces of paper to crush their goal. a piece of paper by the way on production is much cheaper than beads.
  13. Yak28
    Yak28 7 January 2016 09: 36 New
    +7
    Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Navy John Richardson doesn’t know that the fleet of the Russian Federation and China combined, is nothing compared to the huge fleet of the United States. Even 20 years is not enough to even come close to the United States in terms of the number and variety of ships. Once the most powerful the Soviet fleet was destroyed without a single shot, by the traitors of the country under the leadership of Gorbachev and Yeltsin. As a result, Russia is not possible to catch up with in the US shipbuilding.
    1. dauria
      dauria 7 January 2016 11: 14 New
      +5
      As a result, to catch up with Russia in the US shipbuilding, I think it is no longer possible.


      Yes, we were never equal, we always lagged behind and caught up. Well, only in the submarine there were moments, then we’ll lag behind, then in some ways we will overtake a bit. Let them fight with China now, but we just have to keep the bar of “unacceptable” damage so that silly thoughts would not arise.
  14. fa2998
    fa2998 7 January 2016 09: 42 New
    +3
    Quote: Neophyte
    Yes, this is crap

    Another horror story in front of the Senate - GIVE MONEY! None (and together) of the world Navy have dozens of aircraft carriers (with hundreds of planes), and do not have permanent fleets in different parts of the world (Middle Sea, Indian Ocean), and dozens of bases. Infantry in number and equipment can argue with some countries. hi
  15. family
    family tree 7 January 2016 09: 47 New
    +1
    First, to continue "strengthening US naval power, including the modernization of strategic submarines, the development of means of information warfare, and the creation of new weapon systems."

    Secondly, “to achieve high rates of education at all levels”.

    Thirdly, “pay special attention to the motivation of the staff”.

    Fourth, "strengthen cooperation with partners of the US Navy."

    Fifthly, but it’s better, firstly, to kick from the twentieth floor, with a cry of “Russians are coming!” wassat
  16. bronik
    bronik 7 January 2016 09: 48 New
    +3
    "Not by number, but by skill." Our great commanders and naval commanders have proven this many times.
  17. BOB044
    BOB044 7 January 2016 09: 50 New
    +5
    When the Russian Navy beat the Turks and the British on the seas. You Americans were still playing boats in a basin. That's the American general. hi
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 7 January 2016 12: 26 New
      +1
      when the British beat the sea? wassat
      1. tolian
        tolian 7 January 2016 18: 34 New
        +1
        Stirbjörn, then we beat the British to the sea, when they, namely the English, gave a command like - "Let the Turkish dogs down." Learn the story. And think about what this power represents today, over which the sun had not once set. And who has the same Crimea and Sevastopol today. The same awaits the "heirs" of the English - pi ... s. Their blacks will eat. Already started to eat.
  18. nrex
    nrex 7 January 2016 09: 54 New
    +2
    Our rivals have concentrated on taking the lead, but we must accelerate the pace and stop them. The margin is minimal but crucial, ”concluded Richardson.

    And here you are cunning Mr. General! The minimum advantage is not decisive, not at sea, not on land, this is proved by our great commanders Suvorov, Ushakov and Nakhimov. War is a kind of chess and a child’s mate in them, no one canceled. Explore the history of the merchandise partner!
  19. Neophyte
    Neophyte 7 January 2016 09: 56 New
    +2
    Quote: BOB044
    When the Russian Navy beat the Turks and the British on the seas. You Americans were still playing boats in a basin. That's the American general. hi

    Once, the Russian squadron saved the states from the invasion of the fleet of England! Is everything forgotten?
  20. Averias
    Averias 7 January 2016 10: 01 New
    +4
    Strange they are these Americans. That in the Senate, "yelling" about the need to reduce the AUG (they say they are eating a breakthrough). Then again they “start a song” about dominating everything and everything. And the "navel" to tear off for long.
    ... "I’m all so sudden, contradictory ..." (f \ "Pokrovsky Gate")


    PS With the "light hand" of the resource, I became an EU citizen judging by the flag laughing
    1. HAM
      HAM 7 January 2016 10: 13 New
      +6
      Ukrainians will hang themselves with envy, you are already in Europe, and they have carrots in front of a donkey !! hi
  21. HAM
    HAM 7 January 2016 10: 01 New
    0
    I think that the most important of this plan is the third point: “on the motivation of the personnel” is that promise to every sailor a piece of the Arctic for a ranch? If the equipment can be handled more easily, if there was money, then it’s strained, now even American passport is not motivation.
  22. dmitrymb
    dmitrymb 7 January 2016 10: 06 New
    0
    Let them spin the flywheel of the printing press and so on in all directions !!! until they begin to print toilet paper .....
  23. Ros 56
    Ros 56 7 January 2016 10: 08 New
    +2
    It seems to be off topic, but in my opinion everything stretches from here. After all, why, by and large, the USSR fell apart. After all, there was a mighty power with enormous military potential, by the way the only one in the world capable of repeatedly destroying the United States.
    But no, they bought a show off about the SDI (strategic defense initiative), from here they snapped a breakthrough of money, instead of developing the economy. Conclusion - show-offs cost a lot of money.
    Further - Cossacks mishandled, the result of the work of the media "Freedom", "Free Europe", "Jerusalem Jerusalem" heard everything and others are the same, plus "samizdat", plus "farce", plus low salaries, especially in research institutes where they were collected very high quality brains.
    Third - using the principle - I'm the boss, you du..k. Well, if with a membership card, it’s a carcass of light.
    Well, you can still list a lot of reasons, but for this you need to have time, information sources, communicate with a huge number of people who were directly related to those events, because we will die out and we won’t really know anything
    Many probably do not even understand what I mean, but I about the future of us, children, grandchildren - great-grandchildren.
    1. alex-cn
      alex-cn 7 January 2016 11: 09 New
      +4
      As for the poor science in the USSR, you are in vain. For those who worked, lack of money was the first five years. Then, after defending a dissertation, 250-400 rubles, which at that time was not very weak. And with business contracts, etc., the salary of a senior scientific often reached more than 600 rubles.
  24. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 7 January 2016 10: 10 New
    +4
    Again begging for money from the Senate))) Yes, and even "in four directions")))
    The "partners" are right - this is not an arms race. This is a global trolling. Compare the military budgets of the Russian Federation and mattresses? Even with China, it seems that our military budgets are less than the mattress. But the army of mercenaries and bandits requires more and more money.
  25. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 January 2016 10: 11 New
    0
    Do not want to come to terms with the inevitable? Development cycles - they are - first up, then down. AUGs ceased to frighten, and the doctrine was puffed up. It is necessary to invent a new one.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 7 January 2016 10: 17 New
      +4
      So far, aircraft carriers are building shock worldwide.
      The Chinese are planning - 3, the Indians - 3. England will have 2.
      The Americans have -11.
      On large surface ships (destroyers) there will be missile defense everywhere (Aegis and analogues)
      to protect aircraft carriers from BR and KR.
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 7 January 2016 10: 56 New
        +2
        Quote: voyaka uh
        On large surface ships (destroyers) there will be missile defense everywhere (Aegis and analogues)
        to protect aircraft carriers from BR and KR

        If the anti-missile velocity is less than 3 km per second, this is not a missile defense.
        And who will develop SM-3? The speed of the rocket is impressive, but minimal for the BR and our anti-shipments (2,7). The brand-new combined-arms Beech 3 is even faster, but for 400 and 4.8, it’s finally a sub-fence.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 7 January 2016 14: 39 New
          -1
          Improved as a means of attack and defense.
          And it's not only the missile defense speed, but also its maneuverability, GOS
          and the ability to defeat a direct kinetic blow.
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 7 January 2016 15: 09 New
            +1
            Quote: voyaka uh
            And it's not only the missile defense speed, but also its maneuverability, GOS
            and the ability to defeat a direct kinetic blow.

            You speak with a direct kinetic blow. The usual maneuvering warhead falls at you at a speed of 3 km per second, and you have a missile defense of only about 2,7. What are the odds of meeting?
            1. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 7 January 2016 15: 25 New
              +1
              "The usual maneuvering warhead falls at you at a speed of 3 km per second" ///

              But does it fall right on an aircraft carrier? No matter how she maneuvers, get
              necessary to the point. And from this point a rocket flies towards. Chances to meet are pretty good.
              And the kinetic blow on the opposite course will be of immense strength.
              The main thing is to get there. wink
              1. Tusv
                Tusv 7 January 2016 16: 23 New
                0
                Quote: voyaka uh
                The main thing is to get there.

                From point A to Point - B, 2 trains run on a single track. One train is resting, the other is going. Everything was fine, but one wise guy sent two trains to meet. They did not collide. Do you know why? It's not meant to be!

                Here. Probably the same, according to Enschein. The probability is true 10000 times higher, but still negligible 0.0001`
  26. MIKHALYCH1
    MIKHALYCH1 7 January 2016 10: 17 New
    +6
    Of course, we are still far from the power of the US Navy and yet the launch of the "Caliber" from the Caspian, etc. It says that the time of the unpunished piracy of the American fleet in the oceans has ended .. We can get it, all of their aircraft carriers, if anything .. That's interesting (this is during the USSR)
  27. shimus
    shimus 7 January 2016 10: 19 New
    0
    The old Russian proverb "Russians harness for a long time, but go fast", but doesn’t make the strangers admonition !!!
    And after all, every hunt in their own skin to experience the shafts on their back !!!
    There is another saying, “Hurry up in no hurry!”, But the US representatives cannot understand!
    Let them chase the defense! Maybe even a little tired.
    As the two survivors discuss what they will do if day “Ch” comes, the first answers the second, “I make food supplies, and you ...?”, The second answers the first, “No, I’m buying cartridges, I’ll have to, there’s food!”
  28. Cfif2303
    Cfif2303 7 January 2016 10: 21 New
    0
    And I understand him ... they believed in themselves so and then ... some kind of beast drew up .. the scribe is called ... History needs to be taught ... The Germans called the operation to capture Murmansk "Blue Scribe" as they called ..that and received ... Now there will be a scribe of the Pacific ...
  29. Modest
    Modest 7 January 2016 10: 31 New
    0
    Quote: Yak28
    Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Navy John Richardson doesn’t know that the fleet of the Russian Federation and China combined, is nothing compared to the huge fleet of the United States. Even 20 years is not enough to even come close to the United States in terms of the number and variety of ships. Once the most powerful the Soviet fleet was destroyed without a single shot, by the traitors of the country under the leadership of Gorbachev and Yeltsin. As a result, Russia is not possible to catch up with in the US shipbuilding.

    but why do we need the same amount to go out into the pure sea-oceans and whip there wall to wall with them? our fleet has a different task than theirs, not
  30. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 7 January 2016 10: 33 New
    0
    Quote: BENNERT
    American admiral: the Russian Federation and the PRC challenged the fleet of the United States

    Not funny

    Americans have more warships in the ocean zone, than all countries of the world combined. 11 atomic aircraft carriers and 9 helicopter carriers, 72 nuclear submarines, 85 cruisers and destroyers, over 3000 aircraft units.

    The quality gap is even greater most US Navy ships simply have no analogues in the Old World. Giant floating airfields, Aegis system, naval patrol drones, 45 nodal frigates LCS, submarines carrying cruise missiles on 150 ...


    Navy Norfolk - 17 kilometers of moorings with cruisers and aircraft carriers

    What side is the Russian Navy here? Where are his new ships? How is it compared with the American and Chinese fleets?

    Not funny, don't laugh. Well, we will see how they enter the Belorussian Sea and swim to the Rostov Fjords)
    You are trying to compare everything with your finger (doctrine).
    1. Bennert
      Bennert 7 January 2016 10: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Denis-Skiff
      Well, we will see how they enter the Belorussian Sea and swim to the Rostov Fjords)
      You are trying to compare everything with your finger (doctrine).


      From the article:
      US Navy Commander John Richardson Releases Large-Scale Events to Help US Navy Maintain Superiority in the oceans, reports RIA Novosti.

      How:
      The Russian Federation and China defied the United States fleet?

      What can be done in the ocean without ships?
      1. MIKHALYCH1
        MIKHALYCH1 7 January 2016 11: 12 New
        +2
        Quote: BENNERT
        How:
        The Russian Federation and China defied the United States fleet?

        What can be done in the ocean without ships?

        Well, here is one option ...
        1. Bennert
          Bennert 7 January 2016 11: 27 New
          0
          Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
          Well, here is one option ...

          Variants of what

          Submarine - also considered a warship of the ocean zone
          And their number is even less than surface ships

          Then how does the Russian Navy and China defy the United States in the oceans. Without ships
          1. Red_Hamer
            Red_Hamer 7 January 2016 11: 47 New
            +6
            Dear, you still can’t understand that no one will fight with the USA and their allies, in the case of “what”, using the methods of the Second World War.
            1. Nosgoth
              Nosgoth 8 January 2016 07: 33 New
              +3
              "that with the United States and its allies, in the case of" what, "no one will fight by the methods of the second world" ie and will be dreams ?! You do not seem to have pink glasses, but a whole pink space suit.

              When vigorous, ALL die. And we are no exception.

              And when using conventional weapons, the yang has a gain in both quantity and quality (this is even if you do not take into account their allies, and their total potential is also not bad).

              Just the stupid cries about "we will win all the same" mean only that everyone wants a nuclear apocalypse and mutual destruction? It is necessary to soberly assess their strength, and not to DRAW.

              For example, I am a patriot of my country, but patriotism should not be confused with fanaticism. You are in this case a fanatic who does not think about the consequences or the means by which victory will be achieved (there are enough of them).

              ps you can forget about our "allies" right away. If the Amerikos and their allies share common goals and worldview (lord and six, dependence on the United States, “arrogant Saxons and their offspring”, etc.), then our allies are very heterogeneous, even those who are supposedly “fraternal peoples” to us (recent events this is clearly shown, they are fine with us for a while, a little bit instability, they’re looking for where it’s “warmer” right away, but about China and so on, I’m completely silent (it’s just that our common interests coincided, and they don’t die because of their interests interesting, so to speak).
          2. DenZ
            DenZ 7 January 2016 12: 35 New
            +1
            Then how does the Russian Navy and China defy the United States in the oceans. Without ships

            Yes, as if the ships are being built, everything is in order. If Americans interpret this as a challenge, then it is their problem, not ours. John Richardson and ask why he is so afraid.
            1. Atrix
              Atrix 8 January 2016 12: 53 New
              0
              Quote: DenZ
              Yes, as if the ships are being built, everything is in order.

              What ships of the ocean zone are transferred to the fleet and in what quantity. Do you yourself generally understand which ships are being built now and in what quantities ??? You looked at how many ships are being built in the USA.
  31. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 7 January 2016 11: 08 New
    +4
    Here, after all, one must be guided by the principle of reasonable sufficiency. Find the asymmetric answer. The main thing is not to blurt out, as you have plowed into the SDI.
  32. gergi
    gergi 7 January 2016 11: 19 New
    +2
    Of course, if the armada on the armada, and even with rams, well, as in the days of the sailing fleet, then yeah! Power! Just now, this is not for the Americans. They will not be able to protect their pelvis from a high-tech attack. All this gigantic junk is good for intimidating partisans in third world countries. With Russia, it’s not clear, hoot and hysteria.
  33. Friends
    Friends 7 January 2016 11: 21 New
    +2
    Allowed himself to clarify the thought of Mr.. Richardson.

    I think that this will be more true:

    In order to maintain superiority, the commander-in-chief proposed to act in the 4 directions.

    First, give him more money to "strengthen the US naval power, including the modernization of strategic submarines, the development of information warfare and the creation of new weapons systems."

    Secondly, “to achieve high rates of education at all levels” by allocating more money to the commander in chief.

    Thirdly, “pay special attention to the motivation of the personnel”, allocating more money to the commander in chief.

    Fourth, "strengthen cooperation with partners of the US Navy," allocating the commander in chief more money.

    You give more dough, under the cut!

    He further stressed that "the US Navy will remain the best navy in the world only if they fight every minute for their superiority."


    Oh well. you guys are on the right track. Especially considering that you yourself constantly shout that the Soviet Union collapsed due to the huge expenses of the military-industrial complex. According to you, fighting for your military superiority ...

    Flag in your hands ... Fair wind ...
    1. Atrix
      Atrix 8 January 2016 12: 56 New
      0
      Quote: Friends
      Allowed himself to clarify the thought of Mr.. Richardson.

      You think correctly no real challenge now exists from the fleet of Russia or China, the power of the US fleet and its allies. All this is said to intimidate domestic political elites to get more money.
  34. vobels
    vobels 7 January 2016 11: 27 New
    +1
    ".. In order to maintain superiority, the commander-in-chief proposed acting in 4 directions.

    First, continue to "strengthen the US naval power, .."
    You can go no further, and so it is clear after the fourth word of "superiority." They ask for more money, more ..
  35. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 7 January 2016 11: 28 New
    +3
    The Yankees' self-confidence has long been known to everyone as well as their arrogance, but not many people know what they fear most! And everything is very simple — they are afraid of Russia to the “green guano”, because the Anglo-Saxons have it in their blood, after all, historical memory in their subconscious mind is not subject to them! apparently sooner or later they will be calmed down and Russia will act as a "sedative"! As our great ancestors said: "Our cause is just! We will win!" And that says it all, and everything else is just a "rustle of nuts"!
  36. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 7 January 2016 11: 30 New
    +3
    Amers, as always, are amazing. laughing

    What is the background "weighty, rude, visible"examples (such as Syria; Assad did not like), sovereign countries are forced to defend themselves, they consider it a challenge.

    And then what is a huge navy of the states themselves, if not a threat to the whole world? Why do they need such a fleet? Who is threatening them? Unreasonable claims to God's chosen people - yes - they threaten this. But not a country as such, if it begins to behave decently.

    However, to expect decency from amers is something from the category of fantasy. They sexually do not know how to behave decently; Give them all some kind of bestiality and homosexual. laughing
  37. Gunther
    Gunther 7 January 2016 12: 05 New
    +4
    American admiral ....

    Whence this ridiculous association that America is the USA, the same Mexicans have an order of magnitude more rights to call themselves Americans.
    We must get rid of this flawed, in my opinion, habits, shtatovtsy (yusovtsy, etc.) in the best case.
    Fourth, “strengthen cooperation with partners
    US Navy. "

    Yeah, the burden of the world gendarme is expensive, they want to share the costs with the satellites.
  38. tinibar
    tinibar 7 January 2016 13: 16 New
    +1
    Quote: vlad66
    Quote: avvg
    No way Americans can abandon the idea of ​​American exclusivity.

    Yes, let the best be strangled by their exclusivity. Asks for money. Yes, more hoopoe.

    So for sure, one point three about the motivation of personnel is worth it! laughing
  39. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 7 January 2016 13: 17 New
    +2
    The most difficult thing is to guess in peacetime what weapons and tactics will be needed in the coming war, and not just to guess, but also to establish production, train personnel, and develop tactical tactics. This is what conflicts between the great wars are for.
    But this does not give a 100% guarantee. An example is World War II. Even a very trained army, with combat experience and supplied with the whole of Europe, can be defeated by a well-motivated opponent. And a practically won war will turn out to be a complete failure.
    Most likely, a new, previously unused weapon and equipment will come up in a new war. As one of the options for the Chinese laser rifles, officially to disable optical devices of the enemy, in practice they calmly deprive a person of vision ...
    It is officially believed that during the Second World War no chemical weapons were used, but from our memoirs we know very well how opponents smoked each other from bunkers and catacombs ...
    Personally, I think that our country should focus more on defensive preparations within the country. Few people know that guerrilla resistance in the USSR was prepared long before the war.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 7 January 2016 15: 40 New
      +2
      "The most difficult thing is to guess in peacetime what weapons and tactics will be needed in the upcoming war" ////

      You are absolutely right.
      In order not to get into trouble, now they are trying to do
      weapon systems as standardized and modular as possible
      flexible architecture.
      For example, Americans standardized launcher sizes
      mines on their ships and submarines. Those. from any fleet ship
      you can launch any rocket. You can let one "thick" out of the mine, you can
      3 "slim", you can 4 "thin".
      And in the air force in all of NATO + Japan, etc. any missile and bomb
      (within reasonable limits of size and power)
      should be placed in the internal compartment of the F-35.

      Type, boxes (ship hulls and airframes) will remain
      the same for a long time, and the weapon systems on them should change easily and quickly.
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 7 January 2016 17: 14 New
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Type, boxes (ship hulls and airframes) will remain
        the same for a long time, and the weapon systems on them should change easily and quickly.

        The Glider of the Eagle from the Raptor is visually not much different, but Arelik is not nonsense. Up to eight under the feselage and as many on the wings. The standardized Raptor is inferior in armament by 2 times, Lightning by 4.
        I like your standards
  40. Seasoned22
    Seasoned22 7 January 2016 14: 02 New
    +1
    The US Navy is already the largest. If you expand it, the economy may not be overpowered.)))
  41. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 7 January 2016 14: 53 New
    +1
    The third point of his plan cannot be cured. This is perhaps the most important reason why American troops are so weak. And in general, without the fleet we can sink the entire American flotilla, wherever it is. The main thing is to win, and with which money is not important. Russia already has enough money.
  42. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  43. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 7 January 2016 16: 41 New
    +1
    Having the largest fleet in the world is not cheap! if you don’t owe poverty and beg, then they will not only cut spending, but they can also delay salaries? Here is the admiral and begging for poverty, but Russian hooligans and Chinese mafiosi scare the respectable American farmers: "We need to fork out, otherwise they are us"? That's just kirdyk or p ... the American will come just because of their excessive gluttony and voracious numbers - try to feed 12 AUG, 41 submarines ARB, etc. If each AUG costs 6 billion dollars a year? Then I would feed this pack, and give him new hamsters, but fatter than Russia and China! Only China now has 8 jump airfields on artificial islands with powerful air defense (missile defense, anti-ship missiles) will be built in the South China Sea and there will be no sense from 12 American AUGs - there will be a full anus in a compartment with mainland aviation and ships! with regards to the Russian Federation, everything here is not so optimistic - but this is an eternal Russian disease! Chronic, almost incurable! I would help heal, but who needs it? So amer. the admiral can calmly pay no attention to Russian ships - HARMFUL and DANGEROUS, like Russian sailors, and in general RUSSIAN! All with the holiday of Christ and Baptism!
  44. Orionvit
    Orionvit 7 January 2016 17: 48 New
    0
    Quote: demo
    History says that the Empires, even the most powerful, and seemed to be eternal, are coming to an end.
    Either fast, with a crash of destruction, or slow, seeming a normal forward movement.

    All will pass. It will pass.

    Motivation is great.
    That's just the motivation to plant "democracy" and its "maintenance" is one thing, and the motivation to defend your life ideology is completely different.

    I also liked the points: Secondly, "to achieve high rates of learning at all levels."

    Thirdly, “pay special attention to the motivation of the personnel”. The United States has very big problems with education, and as a result with competent military personnel. You can’t send emigrants from Africa or Latin America to the fleet or aviation. This is not infantry; competent specialists are needed there. And the stupid high school graduate of America, who writes in block letters and reads in syllables, also can’t teach anything. And as for motivation, we all remember the case with the destroyer "Donald Cook", we still haven’t received the pill, but immediately managed it. In general, fighting spirit in the states, as well as in Europe, is a very big problem.
  45. Friends
    Friends 7 January 2016 20: 21 New
    0
    Quote: Gunter
    ridiculous association that America is the USA, the same Mexicans have an order of magnitude more rights to call themselves Americans.
    We must get rid of this flawed, in my opinion, habit,


    I agree.

    I also think that the habit is not quite right. Personally, I try to resist her, but also slips. Sometimes.
  46. andrereu74
    andrereu74 8 January 2016 07: 30 New
    0
    Quote: avvg
    sooner or later the end of American hegemony will come.

    and he will come when the demand for green toilet paper with portraits ends))))
  47. GOLUBENKO
    GOLUBENKO 8 January 2016 09: 27 New
    -1
    Quote: BENNERT

    What side is the Russian Navy here? Where are his new ships? How is it compared with the American and Chinese fleets?

    Hitler also thought in the summer of 1941. Think you too. The point is in your aircraft carriers, if they need one Caliber rocket and so on.