Military Review

War goes to home to sponsors of terrorism: Saudi Arabia goes for broke

120



I always liked the white guys, who pushed their heads against the native tribes in the war. In war, it doesn’t matter what - beads, water, diamonds, the most healing herb in the world, from which the war of Western TNCs made drugs among themselves, etc. The Russians, while building the Empire, were not out of this line. Only for cover we used the myth that, they say, it all attacked us, and we only fought back. Further, everyone knows - so defended that they created the largest country in the world. As they say, everyone would be so defensive.

The Anglo-Saxons, due to territorial limitations, and not only in terms of the fact that this is an island, acted more subtly - they came (sailed), were guided by the terrain and set off the local ones. True, sometimes they did not succeed. When it threatened to collapse, then, by the way, unlike the Russians, they organized the genocide - India (Bengal), North America.

Many criticize this approach, and find serious arguments to confirm the point of view that Anglo-Saxon imperialism is not like much more bloody than native Orthodox Slavic. But, by and large, this is a matter of taste, and not fundamental irreconcilable contradictions, or as they say in philosophy - dichotomies. In fact, there are no irreconcilable dichotomies between whites in Russia, Europe and North America. On the contrary, in the light of the growth of completely different global contradictions, including religious ones, the Slavs, the Germans and the Anglo-Saxons unites much more than religion. We are united by skin color. And it is much more fundamental against the background of the coming new world military conflict in the form of the Third World War or the First Religious Conflict, unlike the first two, which were Imperial (first MW) and Civilization (second MW).

It seems that it still can not be avoided. This is a minus. But there is a plus. Unlike the two previous world wars, it will not take place on the territory of Russia and, in general, “white” countries. And this, strictly speaking, will mean our (Russia) rightful entry into the community of "developed" countries and the strategic alliance of the West and the North.

In future textbooks stories will write about what started all January 2. On this day, the Saudis carried out the most massive execution in the kingdom over the past 35 years and executed 47 people on various charges (by the way, the number may not be coincidental of the film “47 Ronin”). One of those executed was an influential Shiite preacher Nimra an-Nimr, who was arrested in 2012 for criticizing the royal family and suppressing Shiite speeches during the “Arab Spring”. For which, of course, Iran immediately fit in: "The unjustly shed blood of this oppressed martyr, without doubt, will have consequences, and divine retribution awaits Saudi Arabia," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei resented. The Islamic Guardian Corps also supported the country's leader - “The pro-terrorist and anti-Islamic regime in Saudi Arabia must be overthrown”.

The people also supported their spiritual leader - January 3 in Tehran during a demonstration of protest against the execution of the preacher-co-religionist, the embassy of Saudi Arabia was crushed by the crowd, and in the city of Mashhad in northeastern Iran, because of the arson attack by the anti-Saudi participants protest, burned down several premises. In addition, unrest began in the Shiite part of Saudi Arabia, including in the hometown of the preacher El Qatif. During the day, they reached such a heat that the authorities of the kingdom were forced to send armored vehicles and military units to the east of the country to pacify the demonstrators. Protests were also held in Bahrain and Lebanon. And then there is Yemen ...

And at the very end of January 3, it became known that the kingdom was breaking off diplomatic relations with Iran: Tehran’s diplomatic mission must leave the territory of the kingdom within 48 hours. At the same time, Saudi Arabia itself on January 3 evacuated 47 employees of diplomatic missions and their relatives from Iran. Suddenly, yes? The only question is for whom ...

As Grigory Ignatov notes: “Let's be honest, without political correctness: any aggressive action against the Muslim majority (whether Sunni or Shiite) leads to extremely predictable consequences. There is no such thing: today, some American pastor will burn the Koran, and tomorrow, thousands of Muslims will go to donate blood for sick children en masse to show how good they are. No, we all know what will happen instead - many demonstrations with enraged mobs, a couple of defeated US embassies and some small (or large) terrorist attacks.

The reaction of Shiite Muslims to the execution of one of their respected leaders also could not be forecasted in advance down to the smallest detail. Execution of Nimr, the Saudis could not understand that they spit in the face of Tehran. With the execution of Saudi Arabia, Nimra instantly made Muslims from almost all Islamic countries, including from among her own citizens, her enemies. Was it possible to foresee such a development of events, even without being an analyst? Lord, yes of course! Such effects were as clear as day! But ... then why? Has the power of the CA acted to its detriment? It may sound shocking, but ... yes.

Very good point. Some may imagine that the Saudis, being in their mind and sound memory, accidentally executed a certain “unknown” preacher to no one, in order to receive an “answer” from Iran (the same “unexpected”) in order to break off diplomatic relations on the same day , the next step after which a declaration of war might well be? There is no need to worry about the lack of a common border - one terrorist act in one country, the response in another, and it started ... But the question now is not at all in the process technology, but in the main thing - by chance or not the Saudis executed the preacher?

In my opinion, this was done thoughtfully. First of all, the rapid reaction of the Saudis to the defeat of the embassy in Tehran speaks about this - on the same day they calmly declare a break in diplomatic relations, as if only this was expected. This is not a Russian-Turkish "mezhdusoboychik" - "the boy said - the boy did." The second (or rather, the first) step by the Saudis was made much earlier, and it is precisely this step that indicates that the execution of a Shiite preacher was a deliberate action with a view to sharply raising tension in the entire Middle East. Let me remind you that December 15 "for no reason, no reason" Saudi Arabia decided to create its own anti-Igilov coalition, which included the 34 states.

Some experts then decided that this action does not make any sense. For example, military expert, orientalist, military translator Boris Podoprigora declared: “It seems to me senseless to create such kind of regional coalitions. It seems to me that a different approach than the one that was recognized as the most correct in the 40-s under the threat of Hitlerism, will not work today. That is, this kind of local unification, be it pro-American, be it Islamic or any other coalition against international extremism and terrorism, is initially unpromising, because the terrorist evil itself far exceeds any local countermeasures in its danger and risks. That's the problem. And therefore, to take some private measures, as I have already told you, is meaningless. ”

At that time, this idea of ​​the Saudis initially seemed very suspicious to me, it was just not clear what the meaning of another, already the third, “anti-Igilov” coalition was about. When between the Saudis and the Persians it started, everything fell into place - the coalition from the 34 countries of the Saudis did not create at all against ISIS, which they also finance (!), But against Iran, their main and sworn enemy.

Those. what we have? When it became clear to the chief instigators of the war in the Middle East (such as the Saudis) that in Russia after Russia’s intervention everything was clear, nobody would give Syria to them, they chose the most unpleasant for themselves, but the last remaining scenario ’ and get involved in the war with Iran. Now they seem to be cool guys. But in fact, everything is already over. If the Saudis reach the war with Iran, it will be possible to put a cross on it. It is quite possible that the last visit of Secretary of State Kerry to Moscow, which caused a lot of interpretations and rumors, was a requiem for Saudi statehood. By the way, it was after this visit that Washington recalled twelve of its fighters from Turkey, although they were put there only in mid-November. That is, at first the calculation was one, and then, after a visit to Moscow, everything changed with an accuracy of 180 degrees. And it is on the day Kerry’s visit to Moscow that the Saudis form their coalition. Accident, of course ...

Those. the answer to Grigory Ignatov’s question “why did the Saudis do this?” is simple. The war has already gone to them: the defeat of ISIS in Syria will return the hydra to their homeland. And we wrote about this in September 2015, in the article “Is there a connection between the events in Ukraine and in Syria”: “There is one more reason why the Americans were so nervous. Let's think - what and how will Moscow do in the Syrian direction? It is clear that to destroy the vanguard of US terrorists under the guise of ISIS. That's how?

If you look at the map of this region, then there can be only one answer: Russia will wrap ISIS from the coast and the north, where now, according to eyewitnesses, there are very fierce battles between government forces, ISIL, the Syrian opposition, Kurds, etc. ., to the south, but not in the direction of Damascus, from which they will also be pushed in the direction of Palmyra and further, but towards the western border of Iraq, where Iraq and Iran will chase them for their part. And there IS only one way left for ISIL - to Saudi Arabia! At home, you can say. In this context, it becomes absolutely logical and understandable that Sechin’s refusal from the proposal of the Saudis to become a Russian member of OPEC. It is too early to negotiate. Too many "kings of the desert" have not yet realized. They still do not understand that with such a development of events they will actually have only two choices: “terrible end or horror without end”.

And if they didn’t do anything, but they waited in silence for it, then the kingdom would be taken apart in parts, as it is now going to happen to Ukraine. They have only one option left - to attack themselves at the head of a hastily cobbled coalition and try to draw the United States into this business, which is about to improve relations with Iran. And then the grandmother ends - the Saudis began to play so much in lowering the price of oil that they remained almost without gold reserves. The only nuance is that there is no more ridiculous thing than the "Saudi coalition." Truly, if God wants to punish a man, he deprives him of his mind.

Those. An interesting picture emerges. In order to unleash the Third World First, the Greater Middle East, including Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, etc., was set on fire for fourteen years. Then - four years Syria. Then, for two months, they tried to set Russia and Turkey against each other, and then, in just two (!) Days, they took and pitted "best friends" between themselves - Iran and Saudi Arabia ... and put the world on the brink of the Third World War. Competent work. Only one question arises - why didn't they do it right away, why all these years of preparation? The answer, of course, is. All this time there was bargaining and mutual pressure from Russia and the West against each other, including Libya, Egypt, Syria and Ukraine (although Russia correctly played the 2000 — 2012 period). Then, after Russia's entry into Syria, a very interesting “squiggle” emerged - some configuration appeared that allowed, in a consistent way and to the mutual pleasure of Russia and the United States, to solve the existing problems and agree globally. But as agreed - to unleash a war stick between two sworn friends turned out to be a matter of two (!) Days.

Not a bad combination. It's hard not to agree. By the way, for Americans in general, the excuse is iron - after all, according to the official version, the Saudis were behind the 9 / 11 attacks. That will return the favor. And Russia will return the favor for all Wahhabi affairs, which for many years drank blood from Russia. And all the other Limitrophers have been given a good sign that there will be enough small geopolitical bipods to push the world superpowers with their foreheads - mankind is full of other, much more serious tasks of civilizational development. And the key to technological development (recall the concept of “method” of Rene Descartes, and the “dialectic” of Hegel, and the concept of “tehne” by Martin Heidegger, in general, the entire terminological scientific-natural and humanitarian apparatus describing the existence of modern human civilization) as a guarantee of existence and the destruction of all mankind, as the whole experience of the development of the world has shown, while only the white race owns And once demonstrated it.
Author:
Originator:
http://regnum.ru/news/polit/2048516.html
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sasha 19871987
    Sasha 19871987 6 January 2016 13: 31 New
    21
    all ge will still return to your house, gentlemen, the Anglo-Saxons ... 3 Newton’s law has not yet been canceled ... for all the military budgets of the same NATO you can give EVERY housework, feed, drink and cure, and these scum are all in war they’re playing, they’re not enough dirty green papers ...
    1. shooter18
      shooter18 6 January 2016 13: 34 New
      27
      all clear! Anglo-Saxons once again mobilize forces around Russia .. in Europe NATO .. ​​in the Middle East igil .. everything repeats .. it was already in history .. we need to first get rid of the colonization of the Central Bank, without fail to nationalize the Central Bank!
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 6 January 2016 17: 30 New
        10
        shooter18

        GDP, he knows when it is necessary to nationalize the Central Bank. Not yet needed.

        Otherwise, it will be difficult to negotiate with whom. In the meantime, there is the opportunity to speak, we must speak.

        Yeah ... the world is full of mysteries. And the most interesting thing is that this mysterious person is very creative. There are more riddles than answers to them.
    2. NIKNN
      NIKNN 6 January 2016 13: 35 New
      44
      The Russians, while building the Empire, did not break out of this series. Only for cover they used the myth that, they say, everyone attacked us, and we only fought back. Everyone knows what follows - they defended themselves in such a way that they created the largest country in the world. As they say, everyone would defend themselves like that.


      Author, Christmas is gonna nag. Fast. You can’t reach the first star! no
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 6 January 2016 14: 00 New
        26
        Quote: NIKNN
        Author, Christmas is gonna nag. Fast. You can’t reach the first star!

        .. judging by this phrase ..
        On the contrary, in light of the growth of completely different global contradictions, including religious, Slavs, Germans and Anglo-Saxons, much more is united than religion. We are united by skin color. And this is much more fundamental against the backdrop of the impending new world military conflict in the form of the Third World War or the First Religious, in contrast to the first two, which were Imperial (first VM) and Civilization (second VM).
        ..it was obviously mushrooms .. Author, tie with mushrooms .. laughing .. and where they suddenly disappeared from the peoples of Russia: .. Tatars, Chechens, Dagestanis, Ossetians, Kalmyks, Yakuts, Buryats, Tuvans, etc. .. oh, Author .. don’t bring the Lord the publication will be read by Sergey Kuzhugetovich .. current Minister of Defense .. laughing .. and, the Author so amused .. about the definitions of the Imperial and Civilization I will not even comment on it and everything is in plain view, oh these Author’s pickled mushrooms laughing .. Merry Christmas to all! .. hi
        1. Al_oriso
          Al_oriso 6 January 2016 14: 46 New
          18
          There were definitely mushrooms.
          I remember the author’s conclusion that Russia and the United States conspired and provoked 3 a world war in the Middle East.
          1. cniza
            cniza 6 January 2016 15: 27 New
            15
            This is a “masterpiece” of analytics and knowledge of the history of the formation of states.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. tol100v
            tol100v 6 January 2016 15: 34 New
            +7
            Quote: Al_oriso
            There were definitely mushrooms.

            And most likely not very fresh!
            1. aksakal
              aksakal 6 January 2016 15: 56 New
              +1
              Quote: Tol100v
              And most likely not very fresh!

              - just fresh, vigorous! The stale do not break through laughing
          4. midivan
            midivan 7 January 2016 01: 19 New
            +4
            Quote: Al_oriso
            There were definitely mushrooms.
            I remember the author’s conclusion that Russia and the United States conspired and provoked 3 a world war in the Middle East.

            yes not mushrooms it smile grass and not of very good quality, and the article reminds - the priest had a dog -
          5. Dry_T-50
            Dry_T-50 7 January 2016 20: 20 New
            0
            Quote: Al_oriso
            I remember the author’s conclusion that Russia and the United States conspired and provoked 3 a world war in the Middle East.

            Nnn-I do not know. Remember, 80 years ago, no one could imagine that in Europe the war would begin with the efforts of the USA, Germany, the USSR and Great Britain
        2. alicante11
          alicante11 6 January 2016 15: 00 New
          27
          and, where they suddenly disappeared from the peoples of Russia: .. Tatars, Chechens, Dagestanis, Ossetians, Kalmyks, Yakuts, Buryats, Tuvans, etc. .


          Well, Duc, moaning under the yoke of the "Russian white man."
          Reading the article, I found for myself the answer to the question of what is the difference between Russian and Western imperialism. Just what the author is trying to deny the difference. Well, really, Russia developed in three ways. The first is when we were attacked, and we fought back so successfully that we came to visit the enemy. You don’t have to go far for examples - Berlin 2 times, Paris. It is clear that we did not attach these "natives" to our Empire. But only because the woman’s yaga is against, that is, "Englishwoman shitting." There are many reasons, of course, but the main one is precisely the one voiced. But if there was no such resistance, or we had enough strength to hold on to the conquests, then this did not prevent us from joining all the Baltic states, Finns, Romanians, Bulgarians, Hungarians, etc. And if we go deeper into the centuries, then we are talking about New Russia , The Urals, Central Asia, the Caucasus (but what about the proud Chechens, didn’t they then engage in raids?). By the way, our expansion in the east was also stopped by the arrogant Saxons. Or rather, at first, under Albazin, our smaller brothers, the Chinese, drove us north. And then, due to the low capacity of the northern lines of communication and the underdevelopment of the merchant and military fleets, it was not possible to first develop Alaska, and then it was necessary to abandon it altogether.
          The second way is when Russian researchers or traders "fell" into the void. Just like the militia near Novoazovsk. They beat him with a fist, but fell into the void. Well, there were native peoples in Siberia, but they absolutely had no opportunity in the near future to create their own state and provide at least some serious armed resistance. Of course, they will tell me that this is not a reason to crush such natives for themselves. However, here the question is posed in a different way. Or we will come to Siberia - or the Chinese. By the way, they felt like masters on the Amur River before the arrival of Nevelsky. True, for them it was something like the Wild West, where it was possible to earn fortunes, without problems from the state. If we do not come to the Far East, then the same arrogant Saxons would come here, they had already run into the Chinese, the English flag over the Far East was quite real. Well, they couldn’t have fought off the English conquistadors. Most likely, they would simply be genocidal. But it was worth colliding with the Japanese, who showed that they can stand up for themselves, but at the same time did not shout at our lands (at first), as soon as our expansion stalled and we were satisfied with Sakhalin, giving the Kuriles to the Japanese.
          Well, the third option is the acquisition of land "so that the enemy does not get it." So the Poles were attached. How much blood they drank to us, but how many centuries have been neighbors. Once they fought, once and together with the Turks and Europeans fought. Well, they “offended” the proud lords only when it became clear, if not us, then the Austrians and the Prussians. But for some reason only we are listed as conquerors.
          1. Pirogov
            Pirogov 6 January 2016 17: 09 New
            +4
            Quote: alicante11
            and, where they suddenly disappeared from the peoples of Russia: .. Tatars, Chechens, Dagestanis, Ossetians, Kalmyks, Yakuts, Buryats, Tuvans, etc. .


            Well, Duc, moaning under the yoke of the "Russian white man."
            Reading the article, I found for myself the answer to the question of what is the difference between Russian and Western imperialism. Just what the author is trying to deny the difference. Well, really, Russia developed in three ways. The first is when we were attacked, and we fought back so successfully that we came to visit the enemy. You don’t have to go far for examples - Berlin 2 times, Paris. It is clear that we did not attach these "natives" to our Empire. But only because the woman’s yaga is against, that is, "Englishwoman shitting." There are many reasons, of course, but the main one is precisely the one voiced. But if there was no such resistance, or we had enough strength to hold on to the conquests, then this did not prevent us from joining all the Baltic states, Finns, Romanians, Bulgarians, Hungarians, etc. And if we go deeper into the centuries, then we are talking about New Russia , The Urals, Central Asia, the Caucasus (but what about the proud Chechens, didn’t they then engage in raids?). By the way, our expansion in the east was also stopped by the arrogant Saxons. Or rather, at first, under Albazin, our smaller brothers, the Chinese, drove us north. And then, due to the low capacity of the northern lines of communication and the underdevelopment of the merchant and military fleets, it was not possible to first develop Alaska, and then it was necessary to abandon it altogether.
            The second way is when Russian researchers or traders "fell" into the void. Just like the militia near Novoazovsk. They beat him with a fist, but fell into the void. Well, there were native peoples in Siberia, but they absolutely had no opportunity in the near future to create their own state and provide at least some serious armed resistance. Of course, they will tell me that this is not a reason to crush such natives for themselves. However, here the question is posed in a different way. Or we will come to Siberia - or the Chinese. By the way, they felt like masters on the Amur River before the arrival of Nevelsky. True, for them it was something like the Wild West, where it was possible to earn fortunes, without problems from the state. If we do not come to the Far East, then the same arrogant Saxons would come here, they had already run into the Chinese, the English flag over the Far East was quite real. Well, they couldn’t have fought off the English conquistadors. Most likely, they would simply be genocidal. But it was worth colliding with the Japanese, who showed that they can stand up for themselves, but at the same time did not shout at our lands (at first), as soon as our expansion stalled and we were satisfied with Sakhalin, giving the Kuriles to the Japanese.
            Well, the third option is the acquisition of land "so that the enemy does not get it." So the Poles were attached. How much blood they drank to us, but how many centuries have been neighbors. Once they fought, once and together with the Turks and Europeans fought. Well, they “offended” the proud lords only when it became clear, if not us, then the Austrians and the Prussians. But for some reason only we are listed as conquerors.
            .................................................. ..............................
            .................................................. ...................
            I fully support!
        3. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 6 January 2016 20: 07 New
          0
          Basically I agree with you. But why do you write capital names of peoples? Now it’s not accepted.
        4. Weyland
          Weyland 7 January 2016 12: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: Inok10
          where suddenly disappeared from the peoples of Russia: .. Tatars, Chechens, Dagestanis, Ossetians, Kalmyks, Yakuts, Buryats, Tuvans


          Other peoples disappeared - Daurs, for example, in full force migrated to China. Circassians piled into Turkey not in full force, but about two-thirds.
          Bushkov wrote best of all about conquering Siberia:
          Ermak comes to some Mansi or Khanty and asks:
          - Who are you heading for the roof?
          - Kuchum!
          - And how many?
          - 5 sables from the nose per year!
          - Damn yourself a mess! Bash at me one sable, but with this scumbag I'll figure it out!
          Khanty and Mansi, essno, shouting "Hurray" voluntarily join Russia.
          Essentially, you have to cut with Kuchum long and hard.
          So statements about the "peaceful accession" or "bloody conquest" of Siberia do not contradict each other: they had to bloodyly conquer the local "masters of life",
          and peacefully attach - everyone else
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. INTER
        INTER 6 January 2016 14: 38 New
        +4
        Quote: NIKNN
        If the Saudis reach the war with Iran, it will be possible to put an end to it.

        Not everything is as simple as the author says! I will explain why, in Arabia, there are the main shrines of Muslims and it is difficult to imagine a Muslim who will react indifferently to an attack, for example, Mecca or Medina. And taking into account the fact that Shiites are about 10%, their fate is not enviable when attacking these cities. Suppose they were driven to the SA so they will fight on their side, or does the author naively think that they will commit atrocities like the Syrian there? The raven will not peck out the crow's eye! And on the sidelines, as they say, no one will remain, including us. I think so))))request
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Nikolay K
          Nikolay K 6 January 2016 18: 22 New
          +3
          Iran, of course, may limit itself to blocking the Strait of Hormuz, but then the international community will declare Iran the initiator of the conflict and will exert any pressure on it. Iran is clearly stronger than the Saudis in "close" combat, its army is larger and better organized, but the problem is that the opponents do not have a common border. And KSA will try to act at a distance, trying to destroy the military and civilian infrastructure, having a clear advantage in modern weapons, especially in tanks and aircraft. If Iran tries to occupy Iraq in order to invade the KSA and engage in close combat, then it will again be accused of aggression with all the ensuing consequences. In a word, everything is not so obvious for the parties.
      3. SklochPensioner
        SklochPensioner 6 January 2016 15: 53 New
        +5
        The author has already darkened, and one, two, or better, of course, five stars appeared belay

        Minister of Emergency Situations: "The Russians famously and cheerfully celebrated the New Year ..." Here I believe him! laughing
      4. Monos
        Monos 6 January 2016 16: 37 New
        +7
        Quote: NIKNN
        The Russians, while building the Empire, did not break out of this series. Only for cover they used the myth that, they say, everyone attacked us, and we only fought back. Everyone knows what follows - they defended themselves in such a way that they created the largest country in the world. As they say, everyone would defend themselves like that.


        Author, Christmas is gonna nag. Fast. You can’t reach the first star! no


        good Short and capacious. Let me add from myself: the conflict between the SA and Iran is undoubtedly the 3 World War (it is the same superpower, undoubtedly!)
      5. gunya
        gunya 6 January 2016 20: 34 New
        0
        But he accepted it, he only postponed it until the first star, and that’s it!
      6. Scraptor
        Scraptor 6 January 2016 23: 46 New
        -1
        This is rather not to his liking ... They went to rob almost everything from the Tatars to the outskirts of the Russian slaves as well. The Crimean Khanate lasted the longest, which was roofed by Turkey and some diasporas there, and the inaccessible Khiva with English instructors. The latter was broken up after the fact that Napoleon abolished the homegrown Peter slavery (his people and not the army were expelled).
        Then another Adik crawled behind Lebensraum and Russian slaves,
        The Chinese through Amur led people to abduct people in due time,
        To the Caucasus, directly from Moscow, slaves (who are in no hurry to disassemble for organs) and now they steal from the black soil like sheep, and one does not have to pretend that all this is not there.
        Another scumbag article on the holiday, allegedly on a Russian resource. And who misses them like that?
        It is doubtful that the author and the dear editors did not even know about the Crimean "raiding economy." By the way, an article about him from Wikipedia was recently deleted by someone, only the broken link (red) from the Battle of Molody remained. laughing
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Битва_при_Молодях
        Probably in order not to “kindle”. Or rather, so that the ongoing lawlessness does not interfere.
    3. MIKHALYCH1
      MIKHALYCH1 6 January 2016 13: 37 New
      +8
      It’s a pity for camels (as they would be without golden teeth) ..Here they used to live quietly, without oil! In which case all the camels will not be saved by the Saudi
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 6 January 2016 15: 51 New
        0
        Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
        It’s a pity for camels (as they would be without golden teeth) ..Here they used to live quietly, without oil! In which case all the camels will not be saved by the Saudi

        - “greens” and animal rights societies need to be attracted, for to accustom animals to golden teeth, and then at the first financial difficulties to refuse camels this is an ACT of the HAREST GENOCIDE in relation to these glorious animals! Without the intervention of these public organizations, we will witness a terrible crime.
      2. 4 wheels
        4 wheels 6 January 2016 17: 45 New
        0
        Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
        It's a pity for camels (as they would be without golden teeth)

        This is not relevant already in the set of new events.
        A camel in a Kevlar kit and a personal non-volatile toilet in an armored capsule - this is now a new feature in the sheikhs lol
    4. Finches
      Finches 6 January 2016 13: 38 New
      +8
      I n ... did not understand! laughing
    5. Kostyar
      Kostyar 6 January 2016 14: 05 New
      +4
      War goes to home to sponsors of terrorism: Saudi Arabia goes for broke

      What goes around comes around!!!
      Saud and Qatar will have to pay the bills, the "reward" will find its heroes even in the toilet .......
    6. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 6 January 2016 14: 18 New
      11
      the article is purely subjective (Written by Yuri Baranchik), which has nothing to do with reality, just a Private opinion, no more ... "analyteGov" of such a ...
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 6 January 2016 15: 55 New
        +1
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        the article is purely subjective (Author Yuri Baranchik),

        - I rarely find fault with surnames, but here the surname does not lie. When the ram is still indulging in difficult mushrooms, then the kebab from this cattle is not recommended categorically.
      2. Rom14
        Rom14 6 January 2016 15: 56 New
        +1
        However, he wrote from a hangover ...
        1. Dembel77
          Dembel77 6 January 2016 17: 11 New
          0
          Probably the author has broken more than one button accordion on the Internet. So we decided to play our favorite musical instrument. Only the song is old - from * its time.
      3. vsoltan
        vsoltan 6 January 2016 17: 55 New
        +3
        Andrey Yuryevich

        1. Not inclined to think that a GREAT war will unleash
        2. He wrote earlier and got cons ... if the war breaks out, then not for oil, not for influence on BV. A hypothetical war will become a war of civilizations, Christians and Muslims. And this question is the most important for the so-called "white world".
        For a nasty, albeit, but no civilization.
        I don't like pederasts and drugs in Europe, but even less I like massive head truncations and sharia.
        IMHO
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 6 January 2016 20: 38 New
          -1
          [quote = vsoltan] I don't like pederasts and drugs in Europe, but even less I like massive head truncations and sharia.
          IMHO [/ quote, I'm sorry, but I will challenge your IMHO, because this is your IM ... and why not argue ??? for me, what you listed is equally not acceptable ...
          1. vsoltan
            vsoltan 7 January 2016 00: 42 New
            0
            I'm sorry, I pressed the wrong button. A plus. Well, I and I do not like one and the other .... But of two evils .... A ray to step into a smaller pile of crap ... oh, sorry ... :-) "unacceptable" in this context, it is written together. Thank you ... :-) sorry for the random minus ... :-) fix ...
  2. vorobey
    vorobey 6 January 2016 13: 32 New
    +9
    and here the Americans beat the Saudis ... the war for the oil market by the states was lost, but it was a Saudi feast of victory .. I will explain later .. I’m waiting for a big bang in the Middle East ..
    1. shooter18
      shooter18 6 January 2016 13: 35 New
      +1
      I do not agree that it was lost ALREADY !! Americans certainly lose influence it is undeniable! but they can easily smell hysterical!
      1. Nick
        Nick 6 January 2016 14: 05 New
        +2
        Quote: shooter18
        but they can easily smell hysterical!

        I hope that the women in the path to the US presidency will be closed.
      2. vorobey
        vorobey 6 January 2016 14: 37 New
        +4
        Quote: shooter18
        I do not agree that it was lost ALREADY !! Americans certainly lose influence it is undeniable! but they can easily smell hysterical!


        they don’t need to plow, they have already pitted Shiites and Sunites ... Saudis will now connect the energy-dependent Turks and then the alignment of forces is not in Iran’s favor ... that’s why the C300 are urgently boosted there .. surely the shot courses for the Iranian generals in Iraq and Syria are open. .. true cacoo banana, they all climb into the trenches on the front end I do not understand ..
    2. GRAY
      GRAY 6 January 2016 13: 40 New
      +3
      Quote: vorobey
      and here the Americans outplayed the Saudis ...

      I am more inclined to think that the Americans played up to the Saudis, or at least did not prevent them from creating a coalition against Iran, similar to the one that was created in Europe against Russia.
    3. atalef
      atalef 6 January 2016 13: 50 New
      +7
      Quote: vorobey
      and here the Americans outplayed the Saudis ... the war for the oil market was lost by the states

      Sanya, not the States lost, but Saudia lost the States
      Quote: vorobey
      but it was a Saudi feast of victory

      No, they have come back and that's enough.
      Will bring expenses to the scope of income.
      Quote: vorobey
      big bang waiting in the middle east

      Still early. The background is not ripe.
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 6 January 2016 15: 08 New
        10
        Quote: atalef
        . The background is not ripe.

        Sanya, they ripen with 2006. Here is a map of Colonel R. Peters, a former Pentagon employee. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in 2006, at a time when no one had heard about ISIS. Saudi Arabia, the main US ally in the region, was left with a short exit to the Persian Gulf, its current coast was “given” to the “Arab Shiite state” - southern Iraq. But even more importantly, the shrines “Mecca and Medina” were “taken away” from the Saudis, having given these sacred cities “for use” to all Muslims. In Riyadh, she was undoubtedly seen, so your prognosis has come to life and it’s quite enough. laughing Happy New You drinks !
      2. avva2012
        avva2012 6 January 2016 15: 51 New
        +1
        The background is not ripe.
        atalef, can you voice? In my opinion, everything is ready. Remained CA, kick in the ass.
    4. Altona
      Altona 6 January 2016 14: 26 New
      +1
      Quote: vorobey
      and here the Americans beat the Saudis ... the war for the oil market by the states was lost, but it was a Saudi feast of victory .. I will explain later .. I’m waiting for a big bang in the Middle East ..

      ----------------------------
      The results of the war are not written by marshals, but by diplomats. What will happen after and what configuration will be drawn in the Middle East. Will the old states fall apart and will new ones be created? Syrian, Iraqi and Turkish Kurdistan, Saudi Emirates, Ottoman Sultanates? Why not?
    5. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 6 January 2016 14: 47 New
      +1
      Quote: vorobey
      nude later .. big bang waiting in the middle east ..

      that is: there will be no "bach" - there will be no explanation? type: didn’t happen ..? wink
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 6 January 2016 15: 06 New
        +7
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        that is: there will be no "bach" - there will be no explanation? type: didn’t happen ..?


        That's exactly what did not happen ... Toda it will be a collapse for amers ..

        Quote: GRAY
        I am more inclined to think that the Americans played up to the Saudis, or at least did not prevent them from creating a coalition against Iran, similar to the one that was created in Europe against Russia.


        it’s unlikely .. the Americans were dying .. if Iran destroys the infrastructure of the Saudis .. the Saudis will leave custody completely .. and here the Americans will help restore everything .. but the control will no longer be with the monarchs but in other hands and the Americans will become the head of the guardianship and receive the ability to dictate prices for a long time .. such a multi-way way I think so
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 6 January 2016 20: 29 New
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          but control will no longer be with the monarchs but in other hands and the Americans will become the head of custody and will be able to dictate prices for a long time .. such a multi-way way, I think

          options are both dicky ... there must be one of ours.
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 6 January 2016 21: 23 New
            +4
            Quote: Andrew Y.
            options are both dicky ... there must be one of ours.


            Andrei Yuryevich, gracious sovereign, well, look at the alignment of the Sunnis - Shiites, even most of the Muslims of Russia are Sunites. and you look, my dear, with whom Russia is making alliances and on whose side is it speaking ... our main gain will be that Muslims, regardless of the current, will understand that Russia is not their enemy and all Muslims who under the wing of Russia have equal rights and, most importantly, the right to life . a little pathetic, but I repeat all nationalities for some reason nouns and only the Russian adjective .. and what connects nouns, gives them colorfulness and life? and therefore what the adjective will be and the world will be, the adjective will be shameful and the world will be the same repeat
            1. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 7 January 2016 17: 17 New
              +1
              Quote: vorobey
              Andrei Yurievich, gracious sovereign, well, look

              ... beautifully sets out ... learn Kitty! (C) good drinks
  3. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 6 January 2016 13: 32 New
    +3
    You should be sooooo careful in your ambitions gentlemen of Saudi !!!
    https://youtu.be/27tadC0hXIw
    1. Stinger
      Stinger 6 January 2016 16: 35 New
      +2
      The ambitiousness of oil shavers has always surprised me. It would seem to pump oil and live in peace. No! Be sure to seek adventure on your ass. If you want adrenaline, then jump from an airplane without a parachute, but why drag people into your adventures?
      1. hrapon
        hrapon 6 January 2016 18: 23 New
        +6
        Quote: Stinger
        The ambitiousness of oil shavers has always surprised me. It would seem to pump oil and live in peace. Not! Be sure to seek adventure on your ass .....


        Colleague, you absolutely precisely localized the root cause. It's all about the ass.

        I do not presume to judge complex archaeogenetic relationships, but the archetype of modern Saudi princes was formed during at least a dozen centuries, when dignitaries (like other tribesmen) carried out sanitary-hygienic procedures for cleaning the sphincter with the left hand finger, i.e. they simply wiped it with ... a finger. That is why the Arabs still consider their left hand to be a "dirty hand" (Can you imagine how they relate to left-handed Americans?). Even in the Middle Ages, the Spaniards, when they wanted to indicate the Arbish origin, someone said: "El hombre limpia el culo con el dedo" (This person wipes with a ... finger).

        In my humble understanding, this could not but affect the worldview, psychology and intelligence of the Saudis, who consider themselves Arabs from Arabs. From here, I dare to assume that the “specific stench” of the Saudi house’s policy has recently arisen.

        Seriously speaking, the Saudis are now experiencing a deep crisis, from which they will not be able to get out whole. They are rapidly losing their weight and influence in the region. The sporadic efforts to pseudo-consolidate the Arab world (ridiculous anti-igil coalition, anti-Iranian solidarity of the Arab League, and deliberately demonstrative execution of ayatola) are all an attempt to show (primarily to their former main US ally) that they are the "main force" in the region. However, this is no longer the case. There is a feeling that they are already pretty tired of the Americans and that the Yankees decided to write them off and set up a new Protectorate on their oil fields, taking control of the Mecca and Medina sacred to the Muslim world.

        What is happening is reminiscent of a “drama in a harem” (Mozart is resting) when the oil monarchy, accustomed to the role of “beloved wife,” suddenly decided that it could control the “unreasonable sahibs” with vagaries and intrigues, but the Owner laid eyes on his neighbor and generally decided to rebuild the harem.

        I believe that these are exclusively striped games. This is another arrogant attempt to redraw the world.
        At first glance, we can also get some dividends from the collapse of the SA, but this is an illusion. The Yankees will not take our interests into account. By taking the Saudi oil reserves under the Protectorate, they will be able to turn the oil market completely without any restrictions. But we do not need this. Therefore, in the interests of Russia de-escalation of the conflict.
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 6 January 2016 19: 58 New
          +1
          Hrapon, why are you still not in the Duma? What, I like, in your comments, is the derivation of the basic principles of general concepts. The fact that the Saudis wipe their ass with their left hand, and this is the fundamental concept of understanding Saudi tolerance, i.e., the lack of understanding, basic hygiene procedures. What can be added to this concept?
          1. hrapon
            hrapon 6 January 2016 20: 32 New
            +3
            Apparently, because I still could not understand what it means to "derive the basic principles of general concepts."

            Besides, here I am not allowed what is allowed to Minister Lavrov. I had to be somewhat verbose.
            1. avva2012
              avva2012 7 January 2016 09: 49 New
              0
              All the same, not bad. Write zealously, damn it!
              1. hrapon
                hrapon 7 January 2016 10: 02 New
                +1
                Thank you, colleague.
                1. avva2012
                  avva2012 7 January 2016 11: 31 New
                  0
                  It's my pleasure. It’s my fault. hi
  4. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 6 January 2016 13: 32 New
    +5
    If someone tells me that Russia in all this "Arab mess", not in business, I will not believe in life! If somewhere, someone is fighting around oil wells, then someone needs this! No?! Try to dissuade! wink
    1. shooter18
      shooter18 6 January 2016 13: 37 New
      +1
      If someone tells me that Russia in all this "Arab mess", not in business, I will not believe in life! If somewhere, someone is fighting around oil wells, then someone needs this! No?! Try to dissuade!

      I completely agree! the war for resources is very serious and in my opinion the whole history of mankind was fought!
  5. aszzz888
    aszzz888 6 January 2016 13: 35 New
    27
    The Russians, while building the Empire, did not break out of this series. Only for cover they used the myth that, they say, everyone attacked us, and we only fought back. Everyone knows what follows - they defended themselves in such a way that they created the largest country in the world.


    Author? These are the consequences of the new year or how?
    1. GRAY
      GRAY 6 January 2016 13: 55 New
      +8
      Quote: aszzz888
      Author? These are the consequences of the new year or how?

      It is his chronic brain achejak that manifests itself, because of this he sees “Russian imperialism” everywhere.
      The article, in my opinion, is pulling an owl on a globe.
      The regional interests of Saudi Arabia coincide with the current global interests of the United States and it is unfair to blame the cunning white sahibs alone.
    2. Victor Demchenko
      Victor Demchenko 6 January 2016 16: 28 New
      +6
      Quote: aszzz888
      Author? These are the consequences of the new year or how?

      this is another you ... p liberoid, who is also trying to mix us with nuggle-saxes and show in further publications how Russians abruptly oppressed the Baltic states and the "great ukrov"
  6. SAM 5
    SAM 5 6 January 2016 13: 36 New
    +4
    This is not a Russian-Turkish “cabal” - “the boy said - the boy did.”

    Put "-" to the author for this phrase. This may be a "brawl" for him, but for most Russians this is far from the case.
    For the rest, one can agree and that is not all.
  7. Polovtsian
    Polovtsian 6 January 2016 13: 36 New
    +3
    Unlike the two previous world wars, it will take place not on the territory of Russia and, in general, on the “white” countries.
    There are HUGE doubts about that, although oh how I would like the Third World to bypass our cities and villages, but because of this, it is also global, which catches everyone.
    And so the article "+".
    SA - now there is Va-Bank, since it has nothing else to do, all military companies Failed to intervene in the internal affairs of other states. Moreover, from Yemen, penetration already began on the territory of the SA itself, and this was in the most oil regions, so soon a lot of interesting things in the world could happen.
  8. Private27
    Private27 6 January 2016 13: 38 New
    +5
    Afror zhezheeettt! The poor fellow was not sober, the muddy consciousness is contorting!
  9. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 6 January 2016 13: 38 New
    +1
    The Saudis seem to have outwitted themselves — now the Ishilovites are simply obliged to demand from the Saudi dynasty or total support in all their deeds, or Gaddafi’s fate awaits this dynasty.
  10. niki233
    niki233 6 January 2016 13: 38 New
    11
    where did this author come from if not from the censor and in general what did he need here?
  11. tanit
    tanit 6 January 2016 13: 39 New
    +1
    Yeah, still - let’s recall the prophecies of the Christian saint Imbecil the Decedent, made 4000 years before the birth of Christ — there, already on his holy child’s skeleton no less holy tablets appeared ... And how many of them appeared on his skeleton as an adult ...
    "St. Jorgen," if the film wasn’t dumb, would have predicted no less tragic.
    No, I’m not trying to offend the feelings of believers, like the feelings of conspiracy theorists, like the feelings of analysts ...
    I am trying to offend the "predictors."
    1. aksakal
      aksakal 6 January 2016 17: 09 New
      0
      Quote: tanit
      I try to insult the "fortune tellers"

      - somehow it didn’t work out very well ... what I will try to help .... In short, the "predictors" are ...!, ...!, ...!, ...!, ...!, ...!, ...!, .. .!. Huh. But it seems to me that the robot will not miss those words that I threw to help Tanit ((((
  12. Kibl
    Kibl 6 January 2016 13: 41 New
    +1
    It's time to roll this Saudi Arabia into a pancake, and for one Qatar and other trouble-makers too! By the way, by the noise to the heap and the USA, well, so as not to return to the question later, otherwise our grandchildren will not understand ......
  13. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 6 January 2016 13: 42 New
    +7
    I do not agree with the author, although I pay tribute to interesting analytics. But he read with pleasure and interest, almost like A. Bushkova. hi
    1. tanit
      tanit 6 January 2016 15: 28 New
      +2
      Svarog or Masuria? Hmm ... Ah, the Siberian horror? No? Well, then you guessed -NKVD against monsters - or something that is just as real ... laughing
  14. tanit
    tanit 6 January 2016 13: 44 New
    +8
    Moses is a prophet revered by both Jews and Christians and Muslims. Jesus is revered by both Christians and Muslims. Mohamed is a prophet revered by one and a half billion people on the planet.
    Yuri Baranchik, I didn’t hear ..
  15. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 6 January 2016 13: 44 New
    +3
    The third world war began on the 2nd ... fellow Christmas is already all sat down so far only from the Korean bomb. What is drooling sprinkle ahead of time?
  16. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 6 January 2016 13: 46 New
    +3
    Well, what we lacked was to "plunge" into the mess between the SA and Iran! Enough experience was gained, and the "unpaid" accounts by the Saudis required an adequate response. Well, what are we helping Syria at the request of a legitimate government, we will help the people of Iran to knock off the horns of “camels”, but we won’t get into a fight! Do we need it?
  17. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky 6 January 2016 13: 50 New
    +9
    The author is an evil Russophobe. after the first paragraph of the evil vyser did not read this abomination
  18. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 6 January 2016 13: 52 New
    +1
    Well, I wanted that piece of desert to become the Great World Piece of Desert. Here you can declare yourself as Don Corleone, and even after that, stay with them for two minutes. Damn, a drum on the neck.
  19. Very smart
    Very smart 6 January 2016 13: 54 New
    -10
    The article is good, the author - respect.
    On the topic: there was a real chance without going in, with the help of the Caliber, to “level out” a couple of ISIS training camps in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain. There, "real boys" immediately jump up, and it will become even more fun. But, most importantly, more fun - there, not here! Let the Saudis slurp hot "without leaving the cash register!" And Iran - help. And no one is behind the noise ... in general, everything will be quiet.
    1. BaLaLaykin
      BaLaLaykin 6 January 2016 15: 44 New
      +1
      wonderful time HOLIDAYS laughing
  20. From Samara
    From Samara 6 January 2016 13: 54 New
    +4
    If there is a war with Iran, then the price of oil will be about 1.000 dollars ...
    1. SAM 5
      SAM 5 6 January 2016 14: 00 New
      +2
      If there is a war with Iran, then the price of oil will be about 1.000 dollars ...

      Xs, now generally any predictions to do an ungrateful thing. The scenario is unpredictable.
      1. From Samara
        From Samara 6 January 2016 14: 02 New
        +2
        And what is there to predict if oil production sites burn, and the Saudis are the main supplier, and Iran’s missiles are a fig!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Al_oriso
      Al_oriso 7 January 2016 09: 00 New
      0
      But the US has opened its oil for export, and its oil is shale, ...
      1. Dry_T-50
        Dry_T-50 7 January 2016 20: 26 New
        0
        Quote: Al_oriso
        But the US has opened its oil for export, and its oil is shale, ...

        It will be like during the Second World War: both yours and ours. Gazprom, alas, will pinch, but there is still an Asian market
  21. From Samara
    From Samara 6 January 2016 13: 56 New
    +2
    Saudi Arabia will lose the Iranian war, even despite their technological advantages in military technology ..
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 6 January 2016 16: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: From Samara
      Saudi Arabia will lose the Iranian war, even despite their technological advantages in military technology ..

      If at least one rocket falls on Mecca, then Iran’s Khan.
      1. Dry_T-50
        Dry_T-50 7 January 2016 20: 25 New
        0
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Quote: From Samara
        Saudi Arabia will lose the Iranian war, even despite their technological advantages in military technology ..

        If at least one rocket falls on Mecca, then Iran’s Khan.

        Iran itself will not raise a hand on Mecca and Medina.
        But on Riyadh is quite possible
  22. Zomanus
    Zomanus 6 January 2016 13: 58 New
    +2
    There are of course a couple of controversial points, but in general the article is interesting.
    I wonder if we will see a direct confrontation in the gulf?
  23. meriem1
    meriem1 6 January 2016 13: 58 New
    19
    The Russians, while building the Empire, did not break out of this series. Only for cover they used the myth that, they say, everyone attacked us, and we only fought back. Everyone knows what follows - they defended themselves in such a way that they created the largest country in the world. As they say, everyone would defend themselves like that.


    The author is new to HISTORY! They squeezed the Crimea out of the way, as they ragged on the raids! The Swedes squeezed out PETER ... So these are the original lands, and they are also embarrassed .. If you think about it, half of the names in Germany bear old Russian names! Siberia. They simply mastered without destroying anyone .. Of course, not everything is so smooth. But the Finns, for example, were Our Principality (like Poland). And for Karelia, Stalin offered twice as much territory. And where they came, they did not turn anyone into slaves. In Alaska and California, Indians pass IT from Rod to Rod. I will keep quiet modestly about the others. And just remember some humiliated ... Sipaev and South Africa! The Opium War in China. ..... Well, enough !!! So the author is in the Archives. And do not shame anymore ... And then the article is so sensible, and the introduction is lower than the plinth.
    1. Victor Demchenko
      Victor Demchenko 6 January 2016 16: 21 New
      +4
      and the end of the article is generally a song, if anything! somewhere at the level of the cellar or rather a pit. from me afflutor agrarian minus! fool
  24. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 6 January 2016 13: 59 New
    +5
    I always liked the white guys who pushed the foreheads of the indigenous tribes in the war.


    Plus smile

    As the unforgettable Ostap Bender used to say (unfortunately, son Turkish citizen laughing )

    "If in two days we don’t get decent food, I will revolt any tribes. Honestly! I will appoint myself an authorized prophet and declare a holy war, jihad. For example, Denmark. Why did the Danes torture their prince Hamlet? Under the current political situation, even the League of Nations will be satisfied with such an occasion for war. By golly buy from the British per million rifles - they like to sell firearms to the tribes - and a marsh march to Denmark. Germany will miss - at the expense of reparations. Imagine the tribal invasion of Copenhagen? Ahead of all, I'm on a white camel".
  25. jovanni
    jovanni 6 January 2016 14: 00 New
    +4
    Well, the author, well, shaitan, knows everything! Although he is lying of course ... Especially about Russia.
  26. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 6 January 2016 14: 08 New
    -5
    The original point of view of the author. In any case, there is nothing to minus it. The mass execution in the SA is an obvious provocation. Absolutely not calculated from the point of view of global consequences. Or vice versa - but an incredibly complex combination, I do not believe that there are analysts capable of calculating such distant dealings.
    1. Extraneous
      Extraneous 6 January 2016 21: 40 New
      +2
      The author is a clear Nazi.
      In addition, he did not take into account a large number of Muslims, both here and in Europe. So in the event of an inter-religious war, which the author wishes, it will be global.
      The execution in the SA could very well have been provoked by the family opposition in the royal house. A very good reason to substitute the monarch and remove him in the wake of the ensuing conflict with Iran. Iran is unlikely to directly enter the war with the Saudis. This is useless. It is enough to strengthen support for resistance in the same Yemen, which will greatly complicate the already hot situation for the SA. Iran’s war with the SA is not beneficial either to Russia, or to Iran, or to the states, as it may result in a direct conflict between NATO and Russia through allied commitments. Neither NATO nor Russia is ready to do this. They will try to extinguish this wave. Saudis are also unlikely to want to hit first. They are counting on NATO assistance. And about the desire of amers to participate in this, I have already said above. The fight will continue to continue indirectly in Yemen and Syria.
  27. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 6 January 2016 14: 12 New
    +2
    It seems that it still can not be avoided. This is a minus. But there is a plus. Unlike the two previous world wars, it will not take place on the territory of Russia and, in general, “white” countries. And this, strictly speaking, will mean our (Russia) rightful entry into the community of "developed" countries and the strategic alliance of the West and the North.

    What did the author of this article smoke?
    1. Victor Demchenko
      Victor Demchenko 6 January 2016 16: 03 New
      +1
      in my opinion he smoked manure from Chui hemp! laughing
  28. vobels
    vobels 6 January 2016 14: 12 New
    0
    "..to the mutual pleasure of Russia and the United States to solve the existing problems and agree globally. But as agreed - to unleash a war between two sworn friends .." It turns out to be cool. And then we think that for these suckers these CAs, why did they start a war game.
  29. gg.na
    gg.na 6 January 2016 14: 17 New
    +1
    What a complicated and incomprehensible article. I could not understand her and figure it out ... BUT! what I think that everything always comes back yes with much greater power repeat what was launched bully initially!
  30. Orionvit
    Orionvit 6 January 2016 14: 17 New
    +4
    Quote: shooter18
    all clear! Anglo-Saxons once again mobilize forces around Russia .. in Europe NATO .. ​​in the Middle East igil .. everything repeats .. it was already in history .. we need to first get rid of the colonization of the Central Bank, without fail to nationalize the Central Bank!

    Nobody has canceled the “Big Game”, and the Anglo-Saxons will spoil a lot of blood. I’m interested in something else when it’s Russia that pushed some natives with their foreheads. Fought a lot, yes it was. But again, because almost all the wars of Russia are a direct result of setting these natives against Russia, you yourself know who. And where are these natives now, all survived with their languages, national identity, territories of residence, and Russia is bad for them. In addition, it also feeds, all national suburbs, these are subsidized regions. To the fact that from among the natives the workers are like from .. on a bullet. All the former "fraternal peoples" separated, and what, everywhere paradise has come? A lot of their small ones are left, and they mark, as it were, Russia to shit, not realizing that without Russia they are nobody. And with the west to which some pray, the fate of the Indians awaits them. I suspect now they are again naming, accusing of racism, but you can’t hide the facts.
  31. Oprychnik
    Oprychnik 6 January 2016 14: 18 New
    +2
    There’s something in there! Putin and Obama conspired, like Molotov and Ribbentrop, and the TMV raced over the bumps!
    Fir-trees! Yurchik completely forgot that Russia will grow in Siberia, and not in the Middle East, to satisfy the imperial ambitions of the people!
    1. Oldwiser
      Oldwiser 6 January 2016 19: 40 New
      0
      But is it weak for us, according to the precepts of Athanasius Nikitin, to swing to the Indian to the Indian Ocean? The last throw - so to the south, you know, and not to the East - there they ran into the Pacific Ocean.
      1. Oprychnik
        Oprychnik 6 January 2016 20: 33 New
        0
        So we already wiped our nose there in 1905. Thanks IV, at least I returned my. And so, on the further expansion of Russia in that direction, the limit was put to us by this magical war - "Next, do not panic! Arrange what you have taken, to begin with."
        And that's right! And in 1991 they prompted again: “You don’t need the South! Let them multiply and multiply by themselves. And you don’t need it. Arrange your territory.”
        What do you think, they just say that the Virgin Mary loves and overshadows her with her cover?)))
  32. shadow
    shadow 6 January 2016 14: 31 New
    +1
    The author is right, but only half. Yes, events unfolded very quickly: in just 2 days. It can be concluded that this was planned. But by whom and why? I think you need to look for the answer in oil, or rather in the prices for it. The Saudis too lowered prices and the United States found themselves in such an asshole that they even began to export oil. When asked to lower oil production, the Saudis refused, after which Kerry went to Moscow to seek support, and the SA created a coalition, albeit in haste, and not very strong. In Moscow, Kerry did not receive support, so I had to do everything ourselves: to pit Iran with Arabia, otherwise America’s kirdyk. Remember, America rose in the sale of weapons to the Second World War, so it is here: pitted and got a market. After all, we refused the armament of the SA when they came to us. What's next? And then kirdyk is already for Europe. Which one? Chemical weapons. His hell 10 tons took mustard gas in Libya, and what will they do with it? And then we'll see ... This is my personal opinion based on all the news that I read.
    1. Extraneous
      Extraneous 6 January 2016 21: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: Shadows
      After all, we refused the armament of the SA when they came to us.


      The conclusion of transactions for the purchase of weapons is the standard move of the Arabs, if they want to bargain for themselves. The type of gift required in the east when visiting an equal in status or higher standing family. They have nothing to do with real arms purchases. In this way, the Saudis have already stockpiled hundreds of tons of both NATO and Russian weapons. Then they let them go on sale slowly.
      The refusal to conclude an arms deal in this case means that the Saudis demanded from Russia what Russia did not intend to do.
  33. Makarov
    Makarov 6 January 2016 14: 37 New
    +3
    My opinion is that the author is either a minor Nazi trying to hide behind a veil of quotation marks for politeness, or simply ... no offense. The world war will not be divided by the color of the skin in the modern world, since the mixture of peoples and blood in the West has already crossed that line when you can separate one from the other - this is the time. JOINED Russia voluntarily (with rare exceptions), and not defensive captures - these are two. V.V. has always been and remains the most respected orientalist in Russian modern politics. Zhirinovsky. The fact that after Syria there will be Iran, he said a year ago and the involvement of Iran in the war is a process of approaching the borders of the Russian Federation ... these are three ...

    And now, dear author, we turn on the imagination and imagine that Iran is becoming the second Iraq, completely controlled by the United States ... or the second Ukraine .... What do you think will happen to the Caucasus? Listen to people who have really dealt with this issue for at least 10 years ....
  34. cheap trick
    cheap trick 6 January 2016 14: 38 New
    +1
    whose grandmother runs out? have the Saudis? you are the author -> author -> the author completely drive a gag! according to conservative estimates, the Saudis have only a reserve of 1 trillion bucks! think about it !!! and most likely there’s still a wagon and a small cart of money. why write propaganda, only the RED ARMY IS ALL STRONG used to! while the Saudis go bankrupt, Russia and America, taken together, will go without pants.
    1. BaLaLaykin
      BaLaLaykin 6 January 2016 15: 41 New
      0
      a trillion or a trillion, and they have 650 billion. For a population of 30 million this is a lot, only without the states this money will not help them.
  35. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 6 January 2016 14: 52 New
    0
    For some reason, there is a lot of discussion on the topic of the Middle East, after each event they try to immediately print some kind of end with the crown of the third world. As if people don’t have enough thoughts to go further. Don’t strain yourself ahead of time. There will be a lot of such events, and the third all the same, you won’t wait, beholders of a damn! The Middle East is really Westerners most likely trying to break up. The main goal is oil. And Turkey was put on the role of the main mediator, it can be traced. Our role: to prevent an animal feast around the swill, so to speak, to calm a little kindergarten a bit. This is essentially the main role of Russia around the world. We want it or don’t want to be world police in this story.
  36. antaeus
    antaeus 6 January 2016 14: 59 New
    +3
    The article clearly has the task to equate the Great Russian World with the Anglo-Saxon one under the sauce of chess arrangement in the Middle East. The task of the article is to put in some brains that we are no worse and somewhere meaner than the west. Just something I do not remember how we warmed the Mongols with blankets with smallpox. And we were always late for the plot with the West.
  37. cap
    cap 6 January 2016 15: 02 New
    +2
    I read very carefully; “I always liked the white guys who pushed the native tribes with their foreheads in the war ..” “The Russians, while building the Empire, did not break out of this series. They used the myth only for cover that they supposedly attacked us all, but we only fought back. ” “As they say, everyone would defend themselves like that.”

    “Anglo-Saxons, due to territorial limitations, and not only in terms of the fact that this is an island, acted more subtly. When the case threatened to collapse, then they, unlike the Russians, staged genocide - India (Bengal), North America. ”

    “Many criticize this approach, and find serious arguments in support of the view that Anglo-Saxon imperialism is not an example much more bloody than the native Orthodox Slavic.”
    “When it started between the Saudis and the Persians, everything fell into place - the Saudis created a coalition from 34 countries not against ISIS, which they finance (!), But against Iran, their main and sworn enemy.”
    “Now they seem like cool guys. But in fact, everything is already over. If the Saudis reach the war with Iran, it will be possible to put an end to it. It’s entirely possible that Secretary of State Kerry’s latest visit to Moscow, which caused many interpretations and rumors, was a requiem for Saudi statehood. ”
    “Then, after Russia's entry into Syria, a very interesting“ squiggle ”emerged - a configuration emerged that made it possible, in a consistent way and to the mutual pleasure of Russia and the United States, to solve the existing problems and agree globally. But how they agreed - to unleash a war between two sworn friends turned out to be a matter of two (!) Days. ”

    “And the key to technological development (we recall both the concept of“ method ”by Rene Descartes, and the“ dialectics ”of Hegel, and the concept of“ tehne ”by Martin Heidegger, in general, the whole terminological scientific, natural and humanitarian apparatus that describes the existence of modern human civilization) as a guarantee the existence and destruction of all mankind, as shown by all the experience of the development of the world, so far only the white race owns. And once already demonstrated it. "
    Author Yuri Baranchik
    However, Rene Descartes and Hegel’s “dialectics” and Martin Heidegger's “tehne” concept, in general, will have to study the entire terminological scientific, natural and humanitarian apparatus that describes the existence of modern human civilization in order to understand that the existence and destruction of all humanity is in the hands of only the white race.
    Or take the author’s word for it.
    At the same time, study the “Mine Camp” by Adolf Hitler.
    To believe in your exclusivity. At the same time with the Anglo-Saxons to finish off a half-wit in their own den, and continue to rest on their laurels, with the rest of the white and fluffy race.
    And to make it clear to all other limitrophes that it will be enough for small geopolitical bipods to push the world’s superpowers with their foreheads - humanity is full of other, much more serious tasks of civilizational development.
    In this case, no interpretations or rumors about Secretary Kerry’s last visit to Moscow arise. This is the requiem for Saudi statehood.
    And I thought .... quite another. And then “national socialism” in its purest form.
    I have the honor. To the author minus. hi
    1. cap
      cap 7 January 2016 01: 53 New
      0
      Yu. Baranchik
      Who the author was interested in. Get to know.
      BARANCHIK Yuri Vladimirovich (b. 1972)
      Belarusian publicist. Graduate of the philosophical department of the Belarusian State University (BSU). PhD in Philosophy. He worked in the Ministry of Education of the Republic, the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Belarus, the Institute of Social and Political Studies at APRB, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Research Institute of Theory and Practice of Public Administration of the Academy of Management under the PRB. Since 2007 - the head of the information and analytical portal "Empire".
      Last place of work - director of the information-analytical center of the Research Institute of TPGU of the Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Belarus.
  38. tanit
    tanit 6 January 2016 15: 23 New
    +3
    Preparing for the World War predicted by you, and the universal kirdyk, trusting you, I:
    1. bought an elite liquor;
    2. bought an elite snack.
    3. bought no less elite corrupt women.
    If the world kirdyk does not come in your time, will you compensate my financial and moral losses?
    Accounts, references and protocols - I will provide. hi
  39. HAM
    HAM 6 January 2016 15: 24 New
    +1
    What I liked was the author’s idea, “from where (evil) came, it went there” - in the SA.
    1. tanit
      tanit 6 January 2016 15: 40 New
      0
      And you are not in the USA, are you talking about Saudi Arabia? They would explain right away. Saddened you, when this evil, you, when it came, Saudi Arabia was not. Not only that, the future Saudis fought against. And the Ethiopian Christians were behind. Are you sure about the "evil"?
  40. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 6 January 2016 15: 53 New
    +1
    When was Saudi Arabia friends with Iran?
  41. Midshipman
    Midshipman 6 January 2016 15: 54 New
    0
    According to the author, to arrange genocide or not to arrange is about the same thing - a matter of taste, damn it. He famously placed equal signs.
  42. Victor Demchenko
    Victor Demchenko 6 January 2016 15: 57 New
    +1
    everything seems to be right. and analytics at the level, and all the same a smell of shit, excuse me for nationalism, it is very clearly visible in the text. Now I really do not want to, but that would not be unfounded:Nice combination. It’s hard not to agree. By the way, for Americans in general, the excuse is iron - after all, according to the official version, the Saudis were behind the 9/11 attacks. So they will return the favor. And Russia will return the favor for all Wahhabi affairs that drank blood from Russia for many years. And all the other limitrophies have been given a good sign that it will be enough for small geopolitical fry to push the world’s superpowers with their foreheads - humanity is full of other, much more serious tasks of civilizational development. And the key to technological development (we recall both the concept of “method” by Rene Descartes, and the “dialectics” of Hegel, and the concept of “tehne” by Martin Heidegger, in general, the whole terminological scientific, natural and humanitarian apparatus that describes the existence of modern human civilization) as a guarantee of existence and the destruction of all mankind, as shown by all the experience of the development of the world, so far only the white race owns. And already once it demonstrated it.
    Sorry it stinks! straight so gosdepovskim darling! ....
  43. revnagan
    revnagan 6 January 2016 16: 07 New
    +3
    The article is interesting, but the author’s passages that Western civilization already sees the Slavs as equal among equals (for the “whites”) evokes a homeric laugh. But the penultimate sentence also made fun. China, Pakistan and India have already been written off by the author. Nude ...
  44. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 6 January 2016 16: 13 New
    +2
    "And there IS only one way left for ISIL - to Saudi Arabia!
    At home, you can say. "////

    ISIS was born in Iraq. Saudi was born its competitor - Al Qaeda.
    1. Dry_T-50
      Dry_T-50 7 January 2016 20: 35 New
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      "And there IS only one way left for ISIL - to Saudi Arabia!
      At home, you can say. "////

      ISIS was born in Iraq. Saudi was born its competitor - Al Qaeda.

      As far as I know, IG is an al-Qaida process that separated from it at the beginning of 2014.
  45. gendir.grifon
    gendir.grifon 6 January 2016 16: 32 New
    +1
    Saudi Arabia is not an independent player in geopolitics, they depend on the Americans. What they say TNCs (transnational corporations) say, so be it.
  46. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 6 January 2016 16: 52 New
    +1
    “A terrible end or horror without an end” - I liked the turnover, the standings!
  47. karavay82
    karavay82 6 January 2016 17: 58 New
    +1
    Everything and everything ... Everything was remembered, but the conclusions are strange.
    Russia was accepted into the "European gang", agreed.
    Not funny.
    Russia has become just a catalyst for the situation with Iran and the Saudis.
    Everyone somehow forgot the experts before Syria, when they bombed Libya, a clear chain of countries that were to be destroyed was indicated.
    Libya-Syria-Iran ... and the natural chain is Muslim countries, which in a certain sense personified the coexistence of Islam and the development of technological, cultural, social. Unlike the Sunni monarchies, which are characterized by luxury (cars, airplanes, gold toilets, hotels) and nothing more.
    They set it on fire, set it on fire ... probably when in fact you read the news and it turns out so simple.
    But in fact - this is analytics, resources, people, and most importantly determination.
    Libya was so politically correctly ruined from the full connivance of the UN.
    Syria had the same scenario, but the analytics failed, and there the situation was rocked, the opposition arose, but it was somehow sluggish, and everything was reinforced by the Needle.
    Everything went according to plan, but then Russia woke up from a dream, and intervene even in Libya, then there was no Syria. At what Irantozh also intervened.
    Now the militants are grinding in Syria ...
    And here is the option with Iran, you just think it’s so easy to agree to such a RISKY
    step. Or your name will glorify for centuries, or curse. The Saudis are very at risk, and most likely they have guarantees from you know who they will protect.
    But in the end, millions will die, millions will be crippled, millions will be left homeless ... and the rich will be richer, the United States and K will solve the problems of dollar hegemony, and the CAPITALIST System will be preserved.
    Russia has become a catalyst. She was pulled in Ukraine, did not succumb, but did not solve the problem to the end. in Syria, in general, a fantastic thing happened, we challenged, Iran also felt that the good old days were back and the United States could be broken off.
    And of course, it was possible for Saudis to incite Iran to Iran (in Ukraine, they incited Europe to Russia).
    And the worst thing is that the world has gone crazy ...
    1. Olegovi4
      Olegovi4 6 January 2016 21: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: karavay82
      world has gone mad...

      not the first time. just not in the last ....
  48. Korsar4
    Korsar4 6 January 2016 18: 00 New
    0
    The article is interesting. The syllable is good. But provocative. The difference between the methods of increasing the territory of the Germans, for example, and the Russian Empire, Ilyin is well shown.
  49. 31rus
    31rus 6 January 2016 18: 36 New
    +2
    Dear, I fully support, members of the forum who noted the article as nonsense
  50. Indifferent
    Indifferent 6 January 2016 18: 47 New
    0
    The author clearly ate the wrong mushrooms for the holidays or smoked something wrong ... There will be no conflict between the Saudis and Iran. Everything will be limited to threats and farce. Rather, ISIS will be squeezed out over time to Arabia and there will be a small "banquet" there.
    The author does not even know that September 11th was not organized by Arabs, but by US special services in order to arrange in the Middle East what they arranged.
    1. Wheel
      Wheel 6 January 2016 19: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: indifferent
      The author clearly ate the wrong mushrooms for the holidays or smoked something wrong ...
      Actually, this is the natural state of Mr. Baranchik.
      Tea, far from the first opus of this author with a repost on VO.