Military Review

The equipment of the Strategic Missile Forces of the combat control system of the new generation will begin this year

76
The equipment of the Strategic Missile Forces of the integrated automated combat control system (IASBU) of the 5 generation will begin this year, the press service informs Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


The equipment of the Strategic Missile Forces of the combat control system of the new generation will begin this year


“Industrial enterprises are being tested by a promising integrated fifth-generation automated command and control system. Starting from the current year, this will allow us to start equipping the upgraded control posts of the Strategic Missile Forces with the links of the IASBU and the developed strategic missile systems (RCCH). Their implementation will ensure the management of both existing and prospective CSCN over several decades ", - said in a release.

The ministry explained that “the exchange of information in the IASBU is based on a digital transmission system of combat orders, which will allow for the operational re-targeting of missiles, as well as to ensure the solution of the tasks of the daily activities of the Strategic Missile Forces Command, formations and formations”.

"The combat control units developed in IASBU together with the established wired, radio and satellite communication channels, which have the necessary survivability and noise immunity, will ensure that combat control orders are brought both to control points of various ranks and directly to launchers, including conditions of nuclear exposure and electronic suppression, "- said the press service.

It is noted that "during the creation of the IASBU, the issue of import substitution was also resolved: only the Russian electronic component base, its most modern designs are used in the development." The system is ergonomic and features “an improved intelligent and user-friendly software interface.”

The ministry clarified that “the newest ASUs of the fourth and fifth generations envisage bringing combat control orders directly to launchers, bypassing intermediate links, including under conditions of nuclear influence and radio-electronic suppression.”
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. APASUS
    APASUS 5 January 2016 15: 09 New
    0
    This is understandable, a new element base, ergonomics and security, and whose PROG?
    Are we writing our own or are we only doing electronics ourselves?
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 5 January 2016 15: 11 New
      19
      Quote: APASUS
      This is understandable, a new element base, ergonomics and security, and whose PROG?
      Are we writing our own or are we only doing electronics ourselves?


      For such objects - only our own software, we have programmers


      Quote: Author
      It is noted that “when creating IASB, the issue of import substitution was also addressed: only the Russian electronic component base is used in the development, her most modern designs". The system is ergonomic and features an "improved intelligent and user-friendly software interface."


      "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

      1. SAM 5
        SAM 5 5 January 2016 15: 18 New
        +1
        Quote: bulvas
        "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

        It’s good that there is no TA-57. wink
        1. Asadullah
          Asadullah 5 January 2016 16: 05 New
          0
          It’s good that there is no TA-57


          belay How so !!! But how to make a "call to a friend" ???!
          1. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 5 January 2016 16: 56 New
            0
            It’s better to invite naval signalmen ...
        2. Truth
          Truth 5 January 2016 16: 22 New
          +3
          Quote: SAM 5
          It’s good that there is no TA-57.

          Yeah ... this phone is a powerful thing ...
          ... two rings of bare wire, to the big toes of the sleeping fighter, and vigorously twist the call lever.
          Emotions eight bags ... damn it, I came across such a scoundrel.
          1. Mikhail Krapivin
            Mikhail Krapivin 5 January 2016 16: 34 New
            +4
            Quote: Truth
            Quote: SAM 5
            It’s good that there is no TA-57.

            Yeah ... this phone is a powerful thing ...
            ... two rings of bare wire, to the big toes of the sleeping fighter, and vigorously twist the call lever.
            Emotions eight bags ... damn it, I came across such a scoundrel.


            And just as our police love this phone, they simply pray for it! He so increases their disclosure! The same two bare wires, but not to the fingers, but to ..., well, the men have already understood and we twist the handle with enthusiasm! Ten seconds later, you are ready to confess to the killing of Kennedy and any other terrifying atrocities, if only they stopped turning the knob.
          2. VP
            VP 6 January 2016 01: 46 New
            0
            And I had to, and with bays for tapik, rush along "very rough terrain" as the main elk of the unit, while loaded with the rest of the equipment and BC (
        3. GRAY
          GRAY 5 January 2016 16: 24 New
          +2
          Quote: SAM 5
          It’s good that there is no TA-57.

          It is with a pen which? Surely there is, well, maybe it’s not he, but something similar probably exists. At least as a backup means of internal communication.
        4. KAZAK67
          KAZAK67 5 January 2016 18: 45 New
          +5
          TA-57 was, is and will be !!!
          1. ver_
            ver_ 6 January 2016 05: 55 New
            0
            ..and thai -43 will not pull ..?
        5. Moore
          Moore 5 January 2016 19: 01 New
          +5
          Quote: SAM 5
          Quote: bulvas
          "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

          It’s good that there is no TA-57. wink

          Answering the first question, I can say that this is not ASBU but simply someone's workplace.
          As for the TA-57, they are still there. Especially when on duty in the field.
      2. Amurets
        Amurets 5 January 2016 15: 21 New
        +3
        Quote: bulvas
        "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

        And this is done so that the enemy does not spy, and then suddenly bookmarks are sewn up in the monitor?
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 5 January 2016 17: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: Amurets
          And this is done so that the enemy does not spy, and then suddenly bookmarks are sewn up in the monitor?

          The presence of bookmarks is quite easily detected, in addition, special generators without fail work in such special rooms, which jam all potential bookmarks.
      3. veksha50
        veksha50 5 January 2016 15: 28 New
        12
        Quote: bulvas
        Why are monitors 20 years old in the photo?



        They just stuck that photo at hand ... This often happens ...

        PS And who will give a new system to photograph ???
        1. Truth
          Truth 5 January 2016 16: 29 New
          +6
          Quote: veksha50
          And who will let you take pictures of the new system ???

          That's right, let the enemies believe that we are launching rockets from matches.
          1. remy
            remy 5 January 2016 18: 04 New
            +2
            Well, yes, so bl .. no one had doubts ...
      4. Samurai3X
        Samurai3X 5 January 2016 15: 30 New
        +3
        Quote: bulvas
        "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

        Because it was stuck that gets into the search for Yandex or google pictures.
        This is just news. It does not have to be supplemented with photographs.
        And so the photo seems to be from here (2011 year, although I think that somewhere in the middle of 00's)
        https://agperm.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/началась-качественна
      5. kil 31
        kil 31 5 January 2016 15: 34 New
        +5
        Quote: bulvas
        Quote: APASUS
        This is understandable, a new element base, ergonomics and security, and whose PROG?
        Are we writing our own or are we only doing electronics ourselves?


        For such objects - only our own software, we have programmers


        Quote: Author
        It is noted that “when creating IASB, the issue of import substitution was also addressed: only the Russian electronic component base is used in the development, her most modern designs". The system is ergonomic and features an "improved intelligent and user-friendly software interface."


        "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

        Yes, nonsense monitors. Over in Syria, we taught how to remotely control the battle on fig monitors.
        As can be seen from the teams, the fighters use ATGMs and probably ZU-23 (a Soviet-made anti-aircraft gun).

        - A convoy of one motorcycle and 4 heavy vehicles is approaching from the West.

        - Anti-tank team, get ready, get ready!

        - Fire, fire!

        - 23 mm shooter, shoot left.

        “Akram, send the missile 200 meters to the left.”

        - Urgent left, they are retreating.

        - Open fire now!

        - All fighters opened fire on the village now.

        - Ideal, repeat to the same place.

        - They are like sheep,

        - Finish them off.

        - Perfect!

        1. sabakina
          sabakina 5 January 2016 17: 35 New
          +4
          That's what I love the Russian language for, because 10 orders can be placed in three letters ... well, if you're lucky, then in five ...
      6. iConst
        iConst 5 January 2016 16: 02 New
        0
        Quote: bulvas
        Quote: APASUS
        This is understandable, a new element base, ergonomics and security, and whose PROG?
        Are we writing our own or are we only doing electronics ourselves?


        For such objects - only our own software, we have programmers


        Quote: Author
        It is noted that “when creating IASB, the issue of import substitution was also addressed: only the Russian electronic component base is used in the development, her most modern designs". The system is ergonomic and features an "improved intelligent and user-friendly software interface."


        "Most modern" - why are monitors 20 years old on the photo?

        - Software can be written in a notebook (tin, of course) without CASE-tools.
        - Domestic Elbrus and "Russian" Baikal (on licensed ARM Cortex A57 cores) are manufactured ... by the Taiwanese company TSMC. In the event of a "mess" - it is clear what will happen ...

        And the monitor in the photo is a projector. And where domestic monitors or projectors will be manufactured and on what element base is a mystery.
        1. adept666
          adept666 5 January 2016 17: 40 New
          +2
          Domestic Elbrus and "Russian" Baikal (on licensed ARM Cortex A57 cores) are manufactured ... by the Taiwanese company TSMC. In the event of a "mess" - it is clear what will happen ...
          Who told you that there is an Elbrus series processor and even more so Baikal-T1? There other microprocessors are used. smile In addition, the same Elbrus-2SM is adapted for production on our territory.
      7. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 5 January 2016 16: 54 New
        0
        There is still a lot of much older technology .. And the modern technology for displaying information has only just begun to be done.
      8. Vadim237
        Vadim237 5 January 2016 17: 30 New
        +2
        Because this photo was taken on April 10, 2003 - there is a date written on the tablet on the left.
      9. kajur7
        kajur7 5 January 2016 21: 55 New
        +1
        On the scoreboard on the left is the date 10.04.03 - elementary Watson
      10. VP
        VP 6 January 2016 01: 43 New
        +1
        Because the texts of the articles are illustrated with the first "thematic" photos that come across. And bloggers find it difficult to take photos from real closed objects.
        And what answer did you expect, do not tell?
    2. Finches
      Finches 5 January 2016 15: 35 New
      +5
      I was here, as if on an opportunity, climbed into the element base of one military product in the field of telecommunications, though Serdyukov's time and was surprised to see the inscription: "Made in Cina" ... I really hope that these were the last echoes of the "effective" management of the then leaders of the Russian MIC! laughing

      But seriously, such tricks on the issue of state defense are not even theft on an especially large scale, but treason to the motherland! With all the ensuing consequences ...

      Somewhere else we still have an incomprehensible organization "Rusnano", just for the creation of its technologies organized by the state ... Which has not just a lot of money, but a lot ... So I hope - everything is grown-up, all its own!
      1. iConst
        iConst 5 January 2016 16: 18 New
        +5
        Quote: Finches
        ... and was surprised to see the inscription: "Made in Cina" ... I really hope that these were the last echoes of the "effective" management of the then leaders of the domestic military-industrial complex!
        “And don't hope.”

        Restrictions on the process technology have long been introduced against Russia, even before the sanctions.
        The maximum that we can buy is machines two generations ago. But this is completely unprofitable.

        The industry was ditched at once, and setting up a complex infrastructure: the production of substrates, precision machines for chip production machines, again, sales markets, etc.

        This is a super task and it will not be possible to solve it without state administration - the train of the market economy has left.
        Empty apron and empty control room. Now they rule megacorporations.

        Only a tough plan with real investment, control and ready sales will ensure success. But ... our officials are not trained in this. The maximum is to play "business" with the state double, like Chubais.
        1. Finches
          Finches 5 January 2016 16: 31 New
          +3
          Konstantin! hi
          They wrote as an incorrigible pessimist, but it’s right - that only strict state control and a planned economy in this area will allow us to keep up with ....
          1. iConst
            iConst 5 January 2016 16: 49 New
            +3
            Quote: Finches
            Konstantin! hi
            They wrote as an incorrigible pessimist, but it’s right - that only strict state control and a planned economy in this area will allow us to keep up with ....

            Mutually! hi

            As noted: a pessimist is a well-informed optimist. smile

            I consider myself a realist. laughing

            And the reality is that not stupid people come to power, but not accountable people.
            If there was a real feedback mechanism with the electorate, then:
            1. Less greedy people would be eager to feed.
            2. Less would be stolen, but more really done.

            These values ​​are multiplied and the effect is multiple.

            But the people are passive. C'est la vie ... smile
            1. Finches
              Finches 5 January 2016 17: 15 New
              +2
              Our mentality is centuries old and well-established! Expressed in a conservative respect for authoritarianism! We trust a strong tsar-father who will punish all wretches even without our participation - for Russia, with its multinationality, multifunctionality and vast territories, democracy in its pure form with its liberal values ​​is not the most effective form of government! As history shows, the peaks of the heyday of the Russian state fall on tough authoritarian rule, and the deepest falls on soft democracy ... The Communists, realizing this, have introduced such a governing body as the Politburo and party control - a very effective means of struggle against the presumptuous bureaucrats, which is now in the present conditions impossible thing! Therefore, Putin maneuvers by creating a rigid vertical of power and various forms of public control, which you are talking about - such as the Popular Front (ONF), but under capitalism, all this is not so effective, unfortunately! Although we must pay tribute - slowly, but surely we are going in the right direction!
      2. Amurets
        Amurets 5 January 2016 16: 18 New
        +3
        Quote: Finches
        Somewhere else we still have an incomprehensible organization "Rusnano", just for the creation of its technologies organized by the state ... Which has not just a lot of money, but a lot ... So I hope - everything is grown-up, all its own!

        I don’t understand what she’s doing? Does the tag on Chinese products re-stick on my own?
        1. Finches
          Finches 5 January 2016 16: 33 New
          +2
          You proposed good nanotechnology ... hi laughing
    3. Great-grandfather of Zeus
      Great-grandfather of Zeus 5 January 2016 15: 42 New
      +1
      APASUS-if you are Chinese, then the elementary base for you is your own, but in software, I think that it definitely should be Russian.
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 5 January 2016 16: 03 New
        +2
        Quote: Great-grandfather of Zeus
        APASUS-if you are Chinese, then the elementary base for you is your own, but in software, I think that it definitely should be Russian.

        And what interestingly made such a cunning conclusion, I can’t understand ........... bully bully
    4. GRAY
      GRAY 5 January 2016 16: 17 New
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      , and whose PROG?

      What other program? We close the chain and FSO laughing
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 5 January 2016 17: 36 New
        0
        For that, this is the most reliable "Prog"
    5. Warrior of Russia
      Warrior of Russia 5 January 2016 17: 00 New
      0
      Here the programs are only domestic! It always has been - a special area!
    6. Vlad5307
      Vlad5307 5 January 2016 17: 38 New
      0
      ask a question without thinking ?! Weird!
    7. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 5 January 2016 18: 00 New
      0
      SKYNet ??? belay ..........................
      1. Colonel
        Colonel 6 January 2016 09: 43 New
        0
        Nope, SKYDa !!! bully
    8. VP
      VP 6 January 2016 01: 34 New
      0
      Do you work in the housing sector?
      You are extremely far from Aichi.
      If completely its own component base, then this means that there is a completely different architecture. And this means that there is nothing close with typical OSes and, accordingly, languages.
      And all the more interesting is what foreign programs you know that are sold to control the Strategic Missile Forces.
      Well, why did you write a post on a topic in which neither ear nor snout? What would become the first in the subject and be noted as patriotically preoccupied with the country's security?
  2. ODERVIT
    ODERVIT 5 January 2016 15: 13 New
    0
    All my own, no doubt.
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 5 January 2016 17: 24 New
      +1
      Quote: ODERVIT
      All my own, no doubt.

      C'mon, on Su-35С a significant part of the elemental base is imported - Chinese and Indian production. With regards to the new cryptographic equipment - the marking of microcircuits is bashfully smeared. So that the manufacturer cannot be established ... request
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 5 January 2016 17: 59 New
        +2
        Quote: Bongo
        C'mon, on the Su-35S, a significant part of the element base is imported - Chinese and Indian production.

        "Gazeta.ru" source of course still the same laughing
        But she claims, according to unnamed people from the Sukhoi corporation, that not everything is so bad:
        The United Aircraft Corporation refused to comment on the situation, saying: "We have no problems with the production of Su-35S." At the same time, a source close to the Sukhoi corporation explained that a number of components of this aircraft could never be replaced.

        “Basically, there is all kinds of“ frizz ”from foreign components: for example, fittings, adjustment pumps, and so on. They are cheap, but it takes time to start doing them here. But the problem is not in them, but in the electronic element base, which no one is even going to do with us. We cannot replace a number of microcircuits with anything, so we will have to purchase them ready-made. This is dangerous, because although they are produced in Asian countries, they are developed in Western countries, primarily in the USA. And no one can guarantee that there aren’t any bookmarks and other nonsense, ”the Gazeta.Ru interlocutor noted.

        http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2015/02/05_a_6400845.shtml

        And how things really are in SU-35 with the replacement of components and parts supplied from abroad would write an article when there will be time if it would not be difficult would be very interesting.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 5 January 2016 18: 05 New
          +4
          Quote: quilted jacket
          And how things really are in SU-35 with the replacement of components and parts supplied from abroad would write an article when there will be time if it would not be difficult would be very interesting.

          To write about this in detail means to be your own enemy. I have already been "asked" to be more careful ...
          1. padded jacket
            padded jacket 5 January 2016 18: 07 New
            +1
            Quote: Bongo
            To write about it in detail means to be an enemy to oneself. I was already asked to be careful ...

            Understand. It's a pity I would read.
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 5 January 2016 18: 09 New
              +1
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Understand. It's a pity I would read.

              I would, too, and probably would have laughed. But I try to write only about what is already on the network. At least on English sites.
          2. NIKNN
            NIKNN 5 January 2016 19: 40 New
            +2
            Quote: Bongo
            Quote: quilted jacket
            And how things really are in SU-35 with the replacement of components and parts supplied from abroad would write an article when there will be time if it would not be difficult would be very interesting.

            To write about this in detail means to be your own enemy. I have already been "asked" to be more careful ...

            Sergey, I probably do not quite agree with you. Our T-50 computers are ours (and surpass the similar F22 hardware by an order of magnitude. The point is that the Su-35CM3 will have modern and domestic electronics and AFAR software and new weapons (for that it is also modernized (SM)). wink with respect hi
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 6 January 2016 02: 43 New
              +1
              Quote: NIKNN
              Sergey, I probably do not quite agree with you. Our computers on T-50 (and outperform the similar F22 hardware by an order of magnitude.

              Nikolay, I can’t say anything about the computing systems installed on the T-50 PAK, since I don’t own information on them request But about the superiority "by an order of magnitude" I will allow myself to doubt this. "An order of magnitude" is 10 times! No.
              Quote: NIKNN
              The point is that the Su-35СМ3 will have modern and domestic electronics and software for AFAR and new weapons (for that it is also serialized (SM)).

              With all due respect, Nikolai, but this is still "Wishlist". request Let's talk about what really exists - it is in service and is being mass-built at KNAAZ. And the reality, unfortunately, is such that without waiting for the P-77, the Su-35С had to arm the P-27.
        2. padded jacket
          padded jacket 5 January 2016 18: 05 New
          +1
          So easy for comparison inside the fighting compartment of our new Armata tank
        3. VP
          VP 6 January 2016 02: 04 New
          +1
          There are no and cannot be bookmarks in microchips. Bookmarks are in systems, in products that are not a microcircuit, but part implemented by hardware and software. Module.
          The chip itself is dead. She absolutely does not care where you stick it. She, even the most sophisticated one, implements only the execution of elementary instructions. Bookmarks make levels higher.
  3. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 5 January 2016 15: 18 New
    0
    What is this photo for the article? From the 90s or what? It's just that the film "DMB" immediately comes to mind ...
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 5 January 2016 15: 25 New
      +3
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      What is this photo for the article? From the 90s or what? It's just that the film "DMB" immediately comes to mind ...

      And who will show the new ones? We chat a lot too much. And we post a lot of extra photos.
      1. Bongo
        Bongo 5 January 2016 17: 21 New
        +1
        Quote: Amurets
        And who will show the new ones? We chat a lot too much. And we post a lot of extra photos.

        Nikolay, unfortunately our "potential partners" learn about new products at the design stage. So VO is not the most important source of information for them. request
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 January 2016 17: 35 New
      +1
      This photo of 2003 - there is a date in the left corner on the panel.
  4. veksha50
    veksha50 5 January 2016 15: 23 New
    +2
    "provide for the delivery of orders of combat control directly to the launchers, bypassing the intermediate links"...

    Hmm ... the idea of ​​the Perimeter (Dead Hand) is practically laid down ... Not really, but still ... If you pass the army and the division link, then the launch dates will be reduced oh how much ...

    PS But this is only for those missiles in which the mission has already been assigned a flight mission ... But the re-aiming, which used to take a lot of time, in this case will also be much faster ...

    In general, thanks to our designers and industrial developers, they work with great benefit for the country's armed forces ...
    1. andr327
      andr327 5 January 2016 16: 49 New
      0
      only this system was to be introduced 2 years ago under a new generation of missile systems, and now it didn’t pass .....
      Developers can’t share the means and responsibility in any way. No beria on them
      1. VP
        VP 6 January 2016 02: 14 New
        0
        Why exactly under the new generation?
        Do you assume that the new missile systems have their own system and the complexes of the previous generation have their own?
        Or that with the start of production of new missile systems, the old ones were urgently scrapped so that they would not interfere with the creation of a new control system?
        Or just did not have time to think about anything?
        1. andr327
          andr327 6 January 2016 06: 42 New
          +1
          The Strategic Missile Forces have always been distinguished by continuity, and no one writes off old systems. but they don’t need to such an extent a new system. Or do you propose to immediately change control equipment everywhere. I understand that nothing is a pity for the army, but not as much. or you can’t imagine the full scope of this work.
  5. Woodman
    Woodman 5 January 2016 15: 31 New
    +1
    Favorite city can sleep peacefully
    And to dream, and turn green in the middle of spring.
    1. Former battalion commander
      Former battalion commander 5 January 2016 17: 50 New
      0
      Then you wouldn’t fall asleep at all so you won’t wake up! And the more in the system of electronics and programs THEME THE SYSTEM IS NOT RELIABLE! If all this is not duplicated in the USUAL WAY - the price of such a system is worthless ... We know, they went through, developed, burned ... But the authorities still don’t suspect it!
      1. VP
        VP 6 January 2016 02: 20 New
        -1
        I don’t know where and in the capacity of whom you "passed" it, but in such organizations this is the very bosses, as a rule, from those who passed it themselves and pulled out topics on themselves. Those. experience they have for a dozen "passed". I myself did not work in that system as a watchman, I know it.
        1. Former battalion commander
          Former battalion commander 6 January 2016 17: 46 New
          0
          Oh, just don't talk about what you don't know! NO SYSTEM CAN BE FULLY TESTED! This is AXIOM! And even if the "bosses" from the "lower classes" and something themselves passed, so this rather speaks just not in favor of reliability, but on the contrary, that the system is LOW-RELIABLE, prone to ERRORS, MISLESSED BOOKMARKS, HEROSTRATIC AMBITIONS ... If you If you rely on systems without INDEPENDENT redundancy, then BIG UNEXPECTATIONS await you at the most inopportune moment ... Only the IDI puts all its eggs in one basket and has no spare options. It looks like in this case we are dealing with just such a situation.
  6. Zomanus
    Zomanus 5 January 2016 15: 41 New
    0
    As I imagine it, now it will be possible directly
    aiming a specific missile to throw off a package with target designation.
    That is, steer launchers online,
    redirecting them according to the current situation.
    Well, cool of course ...
  7. podgornovea
    podgornovea 5 January 2016 15: 42 New
    0
    I wonder if "Perimeter" was also transferred to a new base?
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 January 2016 16: 12 New
    +2
    I hope the developers haven't watched Terminator and won't repeat Skynet laughing
    And you still want to live ...
  9. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 January 2016 16: 26 New
    +1
    Quote: Zomanus
    As I imagine it, now it will be possible directly
    aiming a specific missile to throw off a package with target designation.
    That is, steer launchers online,
    redirecting them according to the current situation

    Well, cool of course ...



    Like so old, like that.
    As for the elemental base and software, since the tasks are narrowly special, it is certainly a question of specific control complexes and a line of data transfer media where there is no place for consumer goods, and mathematics in Africa is Boolean Algebra.
    Something like this.
  10. Sergey Vladimirovich
    Sergey Vladimirovich 5 January 2016 16: 32 New
    +1
    The ministry explained that “the exchange of information in the IASBU is based on a digital transmission system of combat orders, which will allow for the operational re-targeting of missiles, as well as to ensure the solution of the tasks of the daily activities of the Strategic Missile Forces Command, formations and formations”.

    The ASBU of these links has already been asking for a "pension" for a long time, so the time has come.
  11. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 5 January 2016 17: 35 New
    0
    All these electronic gimmicks are not particularly credible, especially the SOFTWARE part of them ... If this system is not DUPLICATED by USUAL (as before!) Means, everything will hang by a thread and in a critical situation MAY AND DO NOT WORK! How to check? But you won’t check it until THIS MOST CRITICAL SITUATION comes! The bottom line is what? The fact that people do the system! And people can make mistakes and sell and be offended and show off ... and all this together REDUCES THE REAL RELIABILITY OF SUCH SYSTEM down to zero ... Alas ... And ah ...
    1. Moore
      Moore 5 January 2016 19: 13 New
      0
      The program there in the sense of the actions performed is quite simple.
      Even at "Topol", according to the "fishery", the capabilities of the NCVK were used by 20-25 percent.
      The whole trick is to achieve the coherence of the equipment of different control levels - where these very capabilities are "cut off", as well as in ... let's call it special devices that allow preventing unauthorized actions and software failures.
      1. Former battalion commander
        Former battalion commander 6 January 2016 17: 57 New
        0
        Respected! Even the MOST SIMPLE PROGRAM MAY NOT WORK, SEND, BLOCK. Especially if you did it SO! How do you check the algorithm laid down by the BUYED ENEMY programmer? How do you check the algorithm laid down by the WORLDWIDE programmer? How do you check the algorithm laid down by the DREAMING ABOUT HEROSTRUS LAURES programmer? How do you check the ERROR algorithm? It is simply IMPOSSIBLE! Hence the POSTULATE, the more complex the system, the less reliable it is! Only duplication of systems up to the most primitive level can give some guarantee of reliability! Most likely, the described system with sufficient reliability is not developed, hence the fears ...
        1. Colonel
          Colonel 6 January 2016 18: 05 New
          0
          Quote: Former battalion commander
          Even the MOST SIMPLE PROGRAM MAY NOT WORK

          Sir, you are a little out of touch. This program will work, it has such a job.
  12. Old26
    Old26 5 January 2016 19: 46 New
    0
    Quote: Zomanus
    As I imagine it, now it will be possible to directly drop off a package with target designation directly from a targeted rocket.

    ASBU transmits only start orders, signals and orders. The very input of the flight mission (target designation, as you write) is carried out already on the rocket itself. At least it was before, and it is unlikely that this has changed. New generations of ACBUs will allow transferring to links 7, not along the line - link 1 - link 2, etc., up to link 7, but immediately to the lower link
    1. Colonel
      Colonel 6 January 2016 08: 40 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      mission input is already carried out on the rocket itself

      Why then? On the Topol, it was possible to retarget the missile from the 5th and 6th levels. True, the OPDshnik had to sit next to him and dictate the numbers.
  13. AIR-ZNAK
    AIR-ZNAK 5 January 2016 20: 23 New
    0
    Decision time is less and less with reduced flight time and increased opposition from a ** probable ally * The final decision is all the same for the person and the new control system will help to quickly understand what is happening as a whole and give a command to counter in the right amount and direction
  14. karevik
    karevik 5 January 2016 21: 01 New
    0
    Lay hydrogen charges off the shores of the Americans and the Angles and warn you a little kirdyk! This is what Sakharov suggested and had to be done.
  15. Old26
    Old26 5 January 2016 21: 52 New
    0
    Quote: karevik
    Lay hydrogen charges off the shores of the Americans and the Angles and warn you a little kirdyk! This is what Sakharov suggested and had to be done.

    Again this nonsense ... Yes, Sakharov didn’t offer to mine the coast with hydrogen charges ... He didn’t offer, and couldn’t offer, knowing how long it was necessary to carry out routine maintenance on charges.
    The only thing he suggested was to use a T-15 torpedo, which by the way did not exist in the hardware.
  16. Mestny
    Mestny 5 January 2016 22: 15 New
    -1
    Quote: Former battalion commander
    But you won’t check it until THIS MOST CRITICAL SITUATION comes! The bottom line is what? The fact that people do the system! And people can make mistakes and sell and be offended and show off ... and all this together REDUCES THE REAL RELIABILITY OF SUCH SYSTEM down to zero ... Alas ... And oh ..

    Imagine, there is no such system. And all that she has to do is done by people - a long chain of people at different levels of government. Well, those who can "make mistakes and sell and take offense and show off."
    So let them do it until that critical situation sets in.
  17. paaash
    paaash 5 January 2016 23: 27 New
    0
    the general principle is clear)) ... and it sounds menacing !!!
  18. Gomel
    Gomel 6 January 2016 10: 38 New
    0
    Hmm in the photo on the CRT screen from the bottom left, it looks like 2000 wines if not 98 ...
  19. Gunther
    Gunther 6 January 2016 21: 43 New
    0
    Good news.
    Bongo Quote:
    The presence of bookmarks is quite easily detected, in addition, special generators without fail work in such special rooms, which jam all potential bookmarks.

    It all depends on the level of the bookmark, the hardware bookmark is not determined either by built-in tests or by visual inspection of the processor.
    For example, six years ago, G. Becker of the University of Massachusetts created a version of a "hardware-level trojan" that disrupts the PRNG in the cryptographic block of Intel's Ivy Bridge architecture.
    K. Talmadge created a hardware trojan for the central processor, providing complete control over the system to a remote user.
    The rotten story with the "domestic" military laptop MVK-2 with a holographic sticker for special checks (nee Getac А790 from the Taiwanese company Getac Technology - purchased by the Russian Ministry of Defense) is well known.
    http://www.securitylab.ru/contest/430512.php
    So, we can only welcome really domestic axis and processors.
    iConst Quote:
    - Domestic Elbrus and "Russian" Baikal (on licensed ARM Cortex A57 cores)

    The Elbrus architecture is an original Russian development, with the implemented support for the Intel x86 architecture (binary translation), for example, in one test - data encryption according to the Russian GOST algorithm - Elbrus bypassed the quad-core Intel Core i7-2600 (3400 MHz i7), and in the case of "Elbrus-4S" the difference was almost two-fold)))