Syrian opposition oppresses Daishe group in the area of ​​the city of Raqqa

40
A coalition of Kurdish and Arab formations ("Syrian Democratic Forces") is conducting offensive battles in the north of the province of Al-Raqa, having beaten several localities from the DAISH (IG) faction, reports RIA News a message from the representative of the Allied Forces Command Talala Selo.



“With the support of the United States,“ Democratic Forces ”managed to repel several villages and settlements near the city of Ain Isa, in 30 kilometers north of the city of Rakka (the self-proclaimed capital of ISIS in Syria),” said Selo.

The city of Ain-Isa was already freed by the militias from terrorists in June last year. However, after 2 of the week, the militants managed to knock out Kurdish units from it.

The fight continues with the DAISh militants in the north of Sinai. There, in the course of the ongoing 3 day of operation, Egyptian troops destroyed 52 of the gangster from Vilayat Sina, a branch of Islamic State.

“In the most large-scale anti-terrorist operation“ Right of the Martyr 2 ”in recent months, attack helicopters, airplanes and ground units are involved,” Al-Masravi reported, referring to military sources.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    5 January 2016 13: 17
    It’s squeezing ... It’s necessary to beat, otherwise some kind of pillow fight Or they still cannot wean that they are fighting not against Assad, but against ISIS?
    1. +8
      5 January 2016 13: 19
      “With the support of the United States,“ Democratic Forces ”managed to repel several villages and settlements near the city of Ain Isa, in 30 kilometers north of the city of Rakka (the self-proclaimed capital of ISIS in Syria),” said Selo.
      As I understand it, I'm even sure that they just renamed.
      1. +4
        5 January 2016 14: 08
        As soon as I.G. by the names it immediately became clear that they all very quickly change the names, and so on to infinity ... well, or until we all of them, together with Assad, do not interrupt.
        1. +3
          5 January 2016 15: 59
          Quote: cniza
          we will not kill them all, together with Assad.

          It sounds ambiguous. laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      5 January 2016 13: 23
      "The" Democratic Forces "managed, with the support of the United States, to recapture IS from the militants

      Now in all the media (Western) read ... Is it familiar? Well, Russia is not the first time to face this! hi Our cause is right, destroy the devils!
    3. +5
      5 January 2016 13: 24
      "Democratic Forces of Syria" - this is, in fact, the opposition of the "official" authority of the Islamic State, but the opposition of Assad, with the light hand of the United States, is called by the opposition - an ordinary play on words and substitution of concepts! Therefore, the command of the Aerospace Forces will need to falsify the coordinates, what they have taken under control, these fiery oppositionists, with the support of their overseas masters ... I think such data will be useful soon ...!
      1. +2
        5 January 2016 13: 36
        Quote: Finches
        The democratic forces of Syria "are, in fact, the opposition to the" official "authority of the Islamic State, but the opposition of Assad, with the light hand of the United States, is called by the opposition - an ordinary play on words and substitution of concepts!


        Interested in your point of view, colleague. hi
        1. +2
          5 January 2016 14: 56
          In 2013, IS militants entered a civil war in Syria against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, which means that, in fact, having entered into an agreement with the very "opposition" supported by the United States, the Americans turned a blind eye to this for a long time in the hope that this formed coalition of oppositionists would overthrow Assad , and only then they will deal with IS, but ... IS became close to success, pushing all the "Democratic Forces of Syria" to the sidelines, which naturally was not at all in the plans of the Oval Office! That is, in fact, it turns out, as I wrote
          All would be nothing and maybe all these guys would have squeezed Assad, but here on the side of official Damascus Russia harnessed, radically changing the entire balance of power in the region and confusing all the calculations of the Americans!
          Best regards hi
        2. +1
          6 January 2016 01: 31
          Quote: Vladimir 1964
          Interested in your point of view, colleague.


          Someone from colleagues, not badly amused at bedtime, putting a minus. That is, someone or something considers me a priori, not in the right to their own opinion. wassat
    4. +3
      5 January 2016 15: 06
      Quote: oldseaman1957
      It’s necessary to beat, otherwise it’s some kind of pillow fight. AND

      good good good
    5. 0
      5 January 2016 15: 39
      Quote: oldseaman1957
      It’s squeezing ... It’s necessary to beat, otherwise some kind of pillow fight Or they still cannot wean that they are fighting not against Assad, but against ISIS?

      The point is different. The Americans, realizing that they would not push us politically, decided to use the same tactics on the soil of Syria as we did, only using their local paid bandits, so as not to be left with nothing. After all, Assad's troops will eventually return the entire territory of the country with the support of our aviation. And theirs "rebels" will be thrown out of the country or destroyed, where they go! The backside is on fire, how to explain to your own citizens the billions of dollars of American taxpayers spent unclear where and for what? request
    6. +2
      5 January 2016 18: 13
      The warriors are useless, from all sides wherever you throw .. They are fighting in the markets, but in a real battle they’re so-so ...
    7. 0
      6 January 2016 16: 05
      What the fuck pillow fight? there cities are dusted away ....
  2. +10
    5 January 2016 13: 18
    I do not understand the Americans opened a second front once again clinging and appropriating?
    1. +13
      5 January 2016 13: 26
      Quote: vorobey
      I did not understand the Americans opened a second front once again

      Well, yes, Front en Nusra and all sorts of fronts (Jebhat), and in the north of Syria somewhere as many as 50 US special forces shy away. request
    2. +5
      5 January 2016 13: 31
      Quote: vorobey
      I do not understand the Americans opened a second front once again clinging and appropriating?

      Well, what are you, just "democracy" wins ... hi Hastily begin to evacuate everyone from the Russian aerospace forces! bully They spent 5 billion on Ukraine, tens of them are here, .. (urgent evacuation of finance leaders ...)))) They will kill everyone else ...))))
      1. +10
        5 January 2016 13: 43
        Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
        Russian Aerospace Forces


        It sounds beautiful ... you need to expand and distribute ...

        The range of the Russian Aerospace Forces is similar
      2. -1
        5 January 2016 17: 56
        Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
        ) They will kill everyone else ...



        Hey.
        I found here the sister of the DAISH executioner, though she doubts that this is her brother, but another thing is important - as they will accept in the EU countries (and the CIS too) returnees from the DAISH army.
        (cry.)
    3. +1
      5 January 2016 13: 50
      Yes, the front was opened. Once they realized that ISIS will be wetted in Syria, it does not matter with or without the Americans. But taught by the experience of the Second World War, they want to seize the capital themselves in order to appropriate the laurels of the winner.
      1. +2
        5 January 2016 15: 34
        Quote: Nikolai K
        to appropriate the laurels of the winner.


        yes the flag in their hands ... let them dare ...
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. -3
      5 January 2016 16: 54
      What else can you tell, can we look at the cards?
      http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Syria%20Blobby%20Control%201
      4% 20SEP.pdf
      http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Syria%20Blobby%20Control%20M
      ap% 2022% 20DEC% 2015_2.pdf

      On the map, I hope you will see that the only ones who normally conquer territories and fight ISIS are SDFs created by Americans from Kurds and Asyrians, who among other things constantly note the assistance of coalition aviation.
      They liberated territories much more than the Assad army
      and with the help of the Americans, they established control over a strategically important facility, a dam on the Efrat River.
      So do not tell that they are taking their laurels
      1. +3
        6 January 2016 01: 06
        Quote: retardu
        So do not tell that they are taking their laurels



        But it’s true .. most of them are controlled ... only you modestly keep silent the darling that this territory is deserted ... but apparently the correctness is not about you .. rather, you are an amateur who does not know that it is more difficult to clean and control the cities than the wind in the field laughing

        and by the way, a logical question arises, and with whom did the calicilium fight the previous two years? is there an answer?
        1. 0
          6 January 2016 11: 32
          Well yes, the desert http://aranews.net/2015/12/us-backed-syrian-democratic-forces-recapture-new-are
          as-from-isis /

          210 settlements in 2 weeks
          http://www.syriahr.com/en/?p=18733
          in May another 230.

          Can you boast of Assad’s success? how many settlements were there, 80?
          You can also recall the past 2 years, Tikrit, Kobani, Djurf-es-Sahr, Sarrin, thousands of dead militants.
  3. +2
    5 January 2016 13: 31
    Rather, it was Russia that opened the "Second Front" in Syria, taking away the victory (as they imagined it) from the United States and Turkey (well, there is also from the SA and Qatar at the same time).
    And this is an attack on Raqqa - I believe when Raqqa is liberated. In the meantime, this is an art theater.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      5 January 2016 13: 55
      I agree. But the theater ... let's say not quite artistic, rather - a booth, where the United States tries to play the role of Karabas Barabas to no avail. And all the other actors (with the exception of B. Assad and his army) are puppets, whose threads break from time to time, with which they are controlled (apparently rotten). The game in the booth went according to the script of K. Barabas, but then a forester came (that is, Russia and its VKS) ... and ruined the whole game. The performance did not go according to a pre-staged scenario. And now the States are doing a good face at a bad game of puppet actors - only they - the great USA can be the leader of a coalition whose members increasingly play their own role, no longer always looking at the director and even forgetting to look into the script.
      I have the honor.
  4. +1
    5 January 2016 13: 31
    It is time for the Kurds to paint their bright future ... These are people who have been fighting for their national definition since childhood ... They deserve more ... than just attention to their needs ... If you conclude clear agreements with autonomy programs with them ... their effectiveness fighting will only increase ...
  5. 0
    5 January 2016 13: 37
    ISIS, at first, became IS, and now DAISH. And the difference was formed between the opposition and Daesh. But what if some time passes and it turns out that the militants were not so bad and Assad is a bad guy.
  6. +1
    5 January 2016 13: 39
    Great news!!!! Raqqa turned into the main terror gopher. Her capture will break Daesh both morally and physically. This is far away, but you need to strain. They are already running away, leaving their pregnant wives and children to their fate. There is nothing sacred for them.
  7. +1
    5 January 2016 13: 48
    It’s going to be a turning point, as I used to comment on Syria’s release in the spring. And the opposition will sort it out after ISIS.
    1. 0
      6 January 2016 03: 24
      The opposition is a serious matter, it must be finished to the end (it was not for nothing that the Russian Aerospace Forces began their work with it), and ISIS - that, they themselves will scatter, it is not for nothing that the blows are inflicted not so much on them (apparently, it is not entirely rational to chase the deserts and roads for several "Toyotas" with the bandits), how much according to their sources of income, but they already ran.
  8. 0
    5 January 2016 13: 59
    It seems that the year of the monkey will be extremely unlucky for DAISHman.
  9. +1
    5 January 2016 14: 04
    I understand that the right hand decided to fill the face with the left, but did not inform the owner. One shaitan is that igil, that these "fighters" are puppets of the United States, and whoever won, and the United States will always win, attributing someone else's victory to itself.
  10. +1
    5 January 2016 14: 06
    It looks like the Americans will again skim the cream of victory. The Syrian army stalled, and the entire
    a rabble called the "opposition" and now the "Democratic Forces", with US support, will "take" Raqqa and the entire oil-producing region. And ISIS will seep through American fingers in the right direction. Most likely, Syria will be divided.
  11. 0
    5 January 2016 15: 23
    To the point. Here are a few of our bombs and Allahakbar.))
    http://www.yaplakal.com/forum28/topic1283633.html
  12. 0
    5 January 2016 15: 29
    And if near the city of Raqqa, put a mus.r.l.s.m. r.ak.kom and put a stake in them in s..r..a..k..k..y? It seems to me that it will help!
  13. +2
    5 January 2016 15: 51
    Current situation (Click-to-click map increases in size)
    Yellow and Dark Yellow Kurds
    Burgundy Iraqi forces
    Assad Reds
    Green Syrian Free Army
    White Al Nusra
    Blue hezbollah
    Orange government of Lebanon
    Gray ISIS.

    The zone of union of the Syrian Free Army and the Kurds, that is, the "democratic forces of Syria" is shown by the fact that the populated points of joint control are partly yellow and partly green.
    1. +2
      5 January 2016 16: 10
      Quote: BlackMokona
      Current situation (Click-to-click map increases in size)

      It’s a very informative map, I just don’t understand, who is controlling the house number 8 on Nayzar Kabani street in Homs? smile
      1. 0
        5 January 2016 16: 20
        The map clearly shows that Homs controls Assad’s army
    2. 0
      5 January 2016 17: 22
      Is this hourly war map not obsolete?
      1. 0
        5 January 2016 18: 51
        Map of January 1, 2016.
  14. +1
    5 January 2016 16: 06
    Racca is kind of like the unofficial capital of Daishovtsev. Etozh moral kick will be hellish power if beaten.
    1. 0
      5 January 2016 17: 24
      They are already creating a new state in Libya, there is practically no one to confront them with.
  15. +1
    5 January 2016 18: 08
    Quote: retardu
    So do not tell that they are taking their laurels

    They were there before, but in friendship with IS. Now they simply distanced themselves from IS, so as not to be eliminated during the liberation and to be able, after the "pacification" in the "democratic" elections under the control of councilors from the SGA, to take power in the region. Already on a legal basis. But this whole process is a time bomb and allows in the future to split Syria into several, as it were, independent entities. So The SGA will be able to promote its project on gas pipelines, which was previously blocked by Syria, but already on the territory of these formations. And for this, formally, Syria will be forced to accept a federal structure or a confederation. In a global sense, Russia in this case will lose to the West, but in return it will get the opportunity to control the BV through its bases (VM and AB). But all the remaining forces of IS and other gangs will be redirected to Russia (through Turkey, Georgia, Central Asia). So the threat from the South will remain and will come to the fore - "friends and partners" will continue to ignite conflicts against Russia. And we need to prepare for this now! soldier
    1. 0
      5 January 2016 18: 53
      Kurds have been fighting with them from the very beginning of the war. The SSA were friends for a while, and then they quarreled. It seems like Anna News about the fights between them is still for 2014, or even earlier.
      1. 0
        5 January 2016 19: 11
        Quote: BlackMokona
        Kurds have been fighting with them from the very beginning of the war. The SSA were friends for a while, and then they quarreled. It seems like Anna News about the fights between them is still for 2014, or even earlier.

        Well, Anna-News often broadcasts fake information. Yes, indeed there were disagreements between the Kurds and the SSA. But they didn’t hear this at war with each other. Kurds after the overthrow of Assad wanted the independence of the Kurdish territories in Syria from the SSA. These forces again began to act together in during the battles for Kobani. It was the SSA units that came to the aid of the Kurds and together managed to push Daesh away from this city. Kobani was of strategic importance and its capture actually meant the loss of the northern territories of Syria.
        1. 0
          5 January 2016 22: 14
          I'm talking about ISIS and the SSA, not about the Kurds and the SSA. Read the post I am responding to.
          PS: And it is true that he wrote his post crookedly, because of which they might not have been correctly understood.
          Correctly it was necessary so
          Kurds have been fighting ISIS since the start of the war. The SSA were friends for a while, and then they quarreled. It seems like Anna News about the fights between them is still for 2014, or even earlier.
      2. 0
        5 January 2016 21: 27
        Everything is simpler. There is no longer a single ssa, but its fragments are each for itself. The coastal division of the SSA, for example, is Turkish and is friends with the Nusra, and we extinguish it from all guns, and part of the SSA, for example, combined with the Kurds. Our aviation, for example, on a tip from the pro-Kurdish parts of the SSA, works on the yoke, and the pro-Turkish militants, too, the SSA in the north of Aleppo. request But we do not bomb the southern front of the Soviet Union because it is rooting with Israel and Jordan, but the Saa work on it themselves. Civil war, she is. wink
  16. 0
    5 January 2016 18: 31
    BE AFRAID ??? WELL TO BE AFRAID, WE RUSSIANS DO NOT BE AFRAID !!!
  17. 0
    5 January 2016 19: 15
    Quote: retardu
    What else can you tell, can we look at the cards?
    http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Syria%20Blobby%20Control%201

    4% 20SEP.pdf
    http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Syria%20Blobby%20Control%20M

    ap% 2022% 20DEC% 2015_2.pdf

    On the map, I hope you will see that the only ones who normally conquer territories and fight ISIS are SDFs created by Americans from Kurds and Asyrians, who among other things constantly note the assistance of coalition aviation.
    They liberated territories much more than the Assad army
    and with the help of the Americans, they established control over a strategically important facility, a dam on the Efrat River.
    So do not tell that they are taking their laurels

    how did you get hooked on these laurels then?)
  18. The comment was deleted.