Military Review

Obama's last year

42
2016 is a year of large elections not only for Russia - November 8 will elect the United States 45 President in the United States. There are no obvious favorites for the race, but American public opinion is an unpredictable environment. But one thing is for sure - the foreign policy line, approved by Barack Obama, will continue until November, and by inertia even longer. This line is aimed at actively provoking domestic and international conflicts in all regions and, above all, in the Islamic world, where the tension reached its limit by the end of the first decade of the twenty-first century.




The Arab spring, which passed through two continents in a whirlwind and disturbed all possible hives, was only the beginning of a great chaos. Chaos, which was to wipe out several dozens of states from the face of the earth. This process does not yet have a name, but it can be very conditionally called a new decolonization, but now independence will be received not by colonies, but by parts of quite sovereign states.

The first swallow on the dismemberment of states (if you do not take the declaration of independence of East Timor in the 2002 year) flashed in the 2011 year, when South Sudan was split off from Sudan with the active assistance of the Americans. It was a kind of experiment on "how it will be." The experiment is largely unsuccessful for its initiators. The fact is that although a territorial dispute with military actions immediately broke out between Sudan and South Sudan, their scale was extremely limited. States, unlike armed groups, have something to lose and they can always declare a "break" and disperse into national apartments, lick their wounds. The organizers of chaos made the following conclusion: in order for the war to blaze and be as long and cruel as possible, the disintegration does not need to be fixed legally, so that the losers simply have nowhere to retreat. This strategy is being used today with success in Libya and Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Each of these states has actually broken up into several parts, but at the level of international law (as in Sudan), no one is in a hurry to consolidate the breakup. Not because someone is interested in the territorial integrity of the above-mentioned countries, but because otherwise the conflict can, if it does not end, then at least lose intensity. After all, if, say, the Yemeni Hussites get their internationally recognized state, then, relying on the support of the same UN, it will be much easier for them to fight within their own territory already completely owned by them. By and large, all parties to the conflict, including ISIS, are striving for recognition - but they will not receive it, since the organizers of chaos are not interested in this outcome yet.

Another important point is that the Obama administration is extremely intolerant about any manifestation of unauthorized independence in the camp of pro-American allies. Much more intolerable than, say, the Nixon administration or even the Bush Jr, at which, as we remember, a demarche of the “old Europe” on the Iraq issue took place. The first black president, in contrast to them, crossed the line that separates the active influence from direct dictate. Such behavior cannot be called reasonable, and it speaks of two possible extremes: either the ruling class of the United States gradually loses the ability to influence otherwise than by direct order, or the governing elites have already degraded so much that they simply cannot otherwise.

This approach is applied to both states and individual groups. Let's say "democratic Europe" felt the power of Washington on itself, as soon as it deviated from the general line regarding anti-Russian sanctions. ISIS * from moderate rebels immediately turned into evil terrorists, as soon as they took a step from the role that they had been taken away from outside.

The third characteristic feature of the Obama presidency is the betrayal of those whom the United States previously called its allies: Japan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, to some extent Turkey. Thus, Tel Aviv ** still cannot believe that the lifting of sanctions against Iran has become a reality and, obviously, they plan to demand additional guarantees. In Japan, they are unhappy with the passivity of the United States towards China and are gradually restoring their naval power. If this goes on, then in the future, Tokyo will face the need to expand the security zone with a subsequent aim at unification historical Japanese lands. Even more interesting is the position of Saudi Arabia, the power that, along with the United States of America, most resembles the archaic colonial empire of the 1970th century. In the XNUMXs, when Nixon canceled the gold backing of the dollar and decided to provide it with oil, a united and stable Saudi Arabia was the guarantee of the stability of the new order. But today, when the dollar is growing due to global instability, as well as due to an increase in the Fed's base interest rate, it does not really need oil any more. And then there is also American oil workers entering the world market and they do not need Saudi competitors at all. On the basis of the totality of circumstances, it can be assumed that the theocratic empire is destined to be “decolonized” in its most radical form, which the Al Saudis clearly cannot be happy about.

As for Russia and China, the desirability of their breakup across the ocean has never been particularly concealed. The Americans are still preparing for a similar fate, despite the apparent warming of relations. Next in line are Turkey, Pakistan, and possibly Indonesia. By the way, more and more signs that fragmentation in one form or another is waiting for Ukraine. There, in the regions, not even two, but multiplicity, are beginning to take shape, while the resources of the central government are already insufficient to stifle the new shoots of separatism.

International politics today resembles a competition under the motto “Who will more quickly move into the abyss,” with the competitor pushing there himself moving away from the abyss for some distance. America today seeks to push everyone away from the edge at once: friends, enemies, neutrals — in order to be as far as possible from the abyss, a meeting with which is inevitable for her anyway. This is the essence of the entire Obama administration policy, which regional powers now resist with varying degrees of effectiveness.

For Russia, all this means the continuation of a consistent and irreconcilable confrontation with the United States, which will develop regardless of whether high-ranking officials want to recognize its reality. It so happened that the US state project does not move to a new level without the collapse of the Russian project, because no single European or Asian country has its resources. Along the way, on the collapse of the Third Rome, smaller players will also try to swim out. Their goal is the same as that of the United States - to hold out as long as possible, avoiding the grasp of Uncle Sam.

In the meantime, games with kerosene and matches continue. The frontier on the Indian-Pakistani border, where until recently it had been calm, flared up the relations between Tehran and Riyadh after the execution of Shiite preacher Nimr al-Nimr. Of course, right now the war will not start, but the degree of confrontation has steadily increased and talk about the war, which three years ago had a purely hypothetical dimension, is now moving into the plane of concrete: who is with whom and against whom, by what forces, and most importantly, when everything will begin. Perhaps it is this atmosphere of universal hatred and mistrust that was the real result of the first black president of the United States, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, who, after such a confusion, is fit to stop issuing.

Whether the vector of American foreign policy will change, it will become clear only in a year, when the next owner of the White House will take its first steps. But you should not prepare for radical changes.


Obama's last year


* Forbidden in the Russian Federation.

** According to the UN Security Council resolution 478 of the USSR, and behind it, the Russian Federation does not recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Author:
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. yuriy55
    yuriy55 7 January 2016 08: 00
    +8
    Will the vector of American foreign policy change, it will become clear only after a year, when the next owner of the White House will take its first steps. But you should not prepare for radical changes.


    Did you take the steps? stop It would be better if he broke his legs and remained motionless for the rest of his life ...
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 7 January 2016 08: 34
      17
      Whether the vector of American foreign policy will change, it will become clear only in a year, when the next owner of the White House will take its first steps. But you should not prepare for radical changes.

      No, it will not change. The President of the USA is the talking head of Wall Street and all Rockefellers, Rothschilds and TNCs there. And let this misunderstanding go to the horses.
      1. DanSabaka
        DanSabaka 7 January 2016 09: 59
        +5
        What are you talking about?
        2016 is a year of big elections, not only for Russia

        after this phrase, the article is no longer mono to read .... what are the BIG ELECTIONS in Russia?
        1. MIKHALYCH1
          MIKHALYCH1 7 January 2016 11: 41
          +6
          Everything goes to this ... They do not want to be friends with Russia, well, their problems! laughing
          1. amirbek
            amirbek 7 January 2016 13: 15
            +4
            Interestingly, on February 16, they will again stir up some kind of catastrophe ... what kind of palosy "titan" nickname will go to the bottom?
          2. gladcu2
            gladcu2 7 January 2016 21: 26
            +3
            MIKHALYCH

            Well, you all translate arrows to Russia ...

            The article is extremely well written. As the saying goes, "not in the eyebrow, but in the eye." Full respect to the author.

            The US is no longer like a state. Rather, it is like a set of heterogeneous commercial poems that conflict at a strategically important state level. The USA itself fell into an environment of chaos and without the firm hand of a wise statesman able to smash the planet, including itself. With wise statesmen the planet has obvious problems.

            By the way to the author. Did you feel that NATO has become a separate commercial structure. In the form of self-sufficiency and independence. Which causes serious concern. So far, NATO is not a danger to the highest degree, but there are already prerequisites for the development of independence.

            And in general, it should be noted that the destruction of states occurs regardless of belonging to the golden billion. The rich are already crying.

            And you MIKHALYCH a topic for reflection. So that the Russian Federation would not shove their opinions into different holes.

            Insurance business.

            The insurance business is a direct function of the state. Donated to private hands. The insurance business has an average annual profit of 200%. With which he pays income tax. Now you can see how much taxes the state loses. This is for you to argue with the "Plato" system.

            Having given such a significant part of the profits to private hands, the state itself is being destroyed.

            The state is the law. And chaos is lawlessness.
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 7 January 2016 13: 41
      +4
      Quote: yuriy55
      Did you take the steps? It would be better if he broke his legs and remained motionless for the rest of his life ...

      He took steps, but it only got to the point where all the candidates, with Trump's light hand, clearly now accuse Obama and Hilory Clinton of creating ISIS and unleashing wars throughout the Middle East.
      1. Alena Frolovna
        Alena Frolovna 8 January 2016 00: 24
        +9
        Letter from Vanka Zhukov (our days)

        Hello Uncle Obama
        Negro Leader Barack!
        Why are you - I ask directly
        Bred around a mess?

        You poke the star flag in hari,
        Offend arabchat
        Killed thousands of people
        (Old men, old women, grandchildren)

        You scare everyone with words,
        Throw bombs at them
        Cocking a parrot
        It's like you're some kind of crazy.

        Stop telling us tales
        Atlas of the World is familiar to me
        I know for sure that Damascus
        Far from Oklahoma

        What can you not share with them?
        And fight with the kid?
        Really really
        Just messing with bullshit?

        I warn you - my grandfather - Zhukov,
        So the other day I bowed you:
        Called a goat and a bitch
        He promised to set the belt!

        And after it does not rust -
        Asshole I remember every moment.
        So be more modest, Barack.
        Take care of yourself, old man.

        Potpies - Vanka Zhukov

        Durimar karabasovich
  2. Jarilo
    Jarilo 7 January 2016 08: 12
    +6
    Judging by the US presidential candidates, either there are no normal people left there, either they don’t want to substitute, or they mow under fools ... no, they don’t mow. The choice is limited: either a donkey, or an elephant, or both in one bottle.
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 7 January 2016 11: 22
      +5
      Quote: Jarilo
      Judging by the US presidential candidates, either there are no normal people left there, either they don’t want to substitute, or they mow under fools ... no, they don’t mow. The choice is limited: either a donkey, or an elephant, or both in one bottle.

      The President in the United States is no one, and the difference in his name is insignificant ... (democracy) request
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 7 January 2016 08: 12
    +6
    America today seeks to push everyone from the edge at once: friends, enemies, neutrals - in order to be as far away as possible from the abyss, a meeting with which is inevitable for it anyway.


    It will fly after, it’s not going anywhere, because tied with one rope.
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 7 January 2016 08: 16
    +2
    And how beautifully he acts ... grimaces in a mirror ... lets a tear in public ... well, right by STANISLAVSKI even a tear struck me ... I almost believed him .... a great actor disappears in him.
  5. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 7 January 2016 08: 18
    +8
    It would be interesting to see if, in all seriousness, some Texas, together with California and Alaska, decided to separate from the USA, and Russia and China actively supported the right of peoples to self-determination, how would they sing in Fashington? repeat laughing
    And then they sit and plan where and whom they share, where to create chaos ...
    "..... s, .... b" (S.V. Lavrov)
    laughing hi
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 7 January 2016 22: 40
      0
      Rurikovichi

      Do you need it? So you talked with the United States, and after the collapse with a bunch of small ones.

      Yes, everyone wanted to spit on the department. Loot cut nada, this is important. For everything else - a bolt.
  6. Tusv
    Tusv 7 January 2016 08: 31
    +4
    This process has no name yet.

    Obama's mess
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 7 January 2016 08: 31
    +3
    America today seeks to push everyone at once from the edge: friends, enemies, neutrals - in order to be as far away as possible from the abyss, a meeting with which is still inevitable for it

    As they say - comments are redundant. Judging by what is happening in the last 2-3 years, the way it is.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 7 January 2016 08: 34
    +4
    ... either the ruling class of the USA is gradually losing the ability to influence otherwise than by direct order, or the ruling elites have already degraded so much that they simply cannot do otherwise.
    The "levers" are too small. Because they decided that the strength is not in the heads when it is necessary to think, but in the "physical" strength, cheap and angry. But time will pass and the "strongman" will fizzle out and what will they say? Well that's all.
  10. parusnik
    parusnik 7 January 2016 09: 15
    +2
    November 8 in the United States will elect the 45th president of the country...In 2016, the year and the reign of the Fire Monkey will end ...
  11. UVB
    UVB 7 January 2016 09: 18
    +9
    Will the vector of American foreign policy change
    One of the options. Years through ... ten:
    1. UREC
      UREC 7 January 2016 11: 19
      +5
      Nafik - nafig, let the power in America move to the indigenous peoples!
    2. Sirius-2
      Sirius-2 7 January 2016 18: 46
      +2
      What beautiful flags !!!
      But the United States must become the Disconnected States, and warring with each other! Geopolitical rival must be fragmented!
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 7 January 2016 22: 46
        -2
        Sirius-2

        No, really. States must remain united.

        And if you want extreme sports. Go out and send the gopniks at the nearest beer stall to the long sexual route.
  12. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 7 January 2016 09: 20
    +8
    The title of the article is just once a year of the monkey. laughing
  13. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 7 January 2016 09: 31
    +1
    Obama will get away but not gifts on the way.
  14. Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 7 January 2016 09: 41
    +4
    Klim died, and hell with him. And in general, less focus on their affairs and more on ours. And it will be all the way.
  15. Leprekon
    Leprekon 7 January 2016 09: 42
    +8
    Somewhere I already saw this plot!
    1. Elena2013
      Elena2013 9 January 2016 22: 37
      +1
      Video Coffins for Americans. World backstage plans.
      1. Elena2013
        Elena2013 9 January 2016 22: 51
        0
        Another interesting video on this topic. "Concentration camps and plastic coffins in the US. America is getting ready." Arkady Mamontov and his team went to America, where he found out that secret objects were being built in the United States, the purpose of which could be a camp for people in case of big riots.
  16. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 7 January 2016 09: 51
    -4
    "As for Russia and China, the desirability of their disintegration overseas has never been particularly hidden" ////

    What a breakup? What matters most to Americans is that nuclear weapons remain
    under the control of a strong central government. Therefore, the collapse of Russia is extremely
    undesirable.
    And the "disintegration" of China is apparently just a slip of the tongue by the author of the article.
    1. MIKHALYCH1
      MIKHALYCH1 7 January 2016 11: 50
      +5
      Quote: voyaka uh
      What matters most to Americans is that nuclear weapons remain
      controlled by a strong central government

      How in the 90s ..? I remember, I remember then a little bit of security (special forces of the USA) was not put up at our strategic points ... They started to cut everything in the literal sense of the word! Thank God, not everyone had time ...
    2. 0255
      0255 7 January 2016 12: 07
      +9
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Therefore, the collapse of Russia is extremely
      undesirable.

      So "undesirable" that the United States supported Chechen terrorists in 1994-2000, finance movements like "Siberia is not Russia" or "Ural is not Russia"? What do they dream of seeing Russia like this in the future?
    3. Weyland
      Weyland 7 January 2016 20: 05
      +3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      What matters most to Americans is that nuclear weapons remain under the control of a central strong government. Therefore, the collapse of Russia is extremely undesirable.


      Whom the enemy praises us - in that, apparently, there is no sense! (from)
    4. The comment was deleted.
  17. Stoler
    Stoler 7 January 2016 10: 14
    +6
    Last year of the Black Monkey.
    1. MIKHALYCH1
      MIKHALYCH1 7 January 2016 11: 44
      +3
      Quote: Stoler
      Last year of the Black Monkey.

      The hint understood ..... laughing laughing good
  18. viktor561
    viktor561 7 January 2016 11: 56
    +4
    Quote: voyaka uh
    And the "disintegration" of China is apparently just a slip of the tongue by the author of the article.

    Why a typo? Taiwan split off and in Tibet is not calm.
  19. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 7 January 2016 11: 59
    +4
    Interestingly, the author interpreted the role and actions of Obama, and Igor Kabardin’s analyst as always is not bad. And I really liked the conclusion
    Perhaps it was this atmosphere of universal hatred and mistrust that was the true result of the reign of the first black president of the United States, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, who after such embarrassment fit to stop giving out altogether.

    True, as always, the author left us little bright in the future, but the article is still interesting. hi
  20. Seasoned22
    Seasoned22 7 January 2016 14: 03
    +4
    As Obama was a hut so messed up and stayed.
  21. givigor71
    givigor71 7 January 2016 14: 07
    +1
    It’s already time to leave him ...
    1. Vladimir 1964
      Vladimir 1964 7 January 2016 17: 06
      +3
      Quote: givigor71
      It’s already time to leave him ...

      Colleague, do you think the next one will be better? This is a system, and he is only a representative, and nothing more.
      Something like that, colleague. hi
    2. Sirius-2
      Sirius-2 7 January 2016 18: 50
      +4
      Clinton said about Yeltsin: The longer he has been in power, the better for America.
      The longer Obama will rule, the worse for America!
    3. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 7 January 2016 20: 40
      +1
      Quote: givigor71
      It’s already time to leave him ...

      Why make him a hero posthumously? request
  22. Worohilow
    Worohilow 7 January 2016 15: 57
    +3
    the person will be replaced and the claims and slogans will remain, the main thing is that there shouldn’t be worse hi
  23. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 7 January 2016 16: 11
    +1
    The last year of Obama ... and America ...

    Yes, let it be so! Amen!
  24. TsUS-Air Force
    TsUS-Air Force 7 January 2016 17: 27
    +1
    and remember, just recently, after the younger Bush, everyone said that relations with Obama were a thaw, and then suddenly the threat of impeachment did not trust the United States and Obama became against Russia. guys and what is happening then?
    1. cap
      cap 8 January 2016 02: 09
      +2
      Quote: NOC-VVS
      and remember, just recently, after the younger Bush, everyone said that relations with Obama were a thaw, and then suddenly the threat of impeachment did not trust the United States and Obama became against Russia. guys and what is happening then?


      What is happening is that in the new US military doctrine Russia is a "revisionist" state. Here is just a short excerpt from the document:
      “The concept of“ revisionist states ”has been introduced in the new strategy. By “revisionism” is meant the desire of states to change their current status to a higher world level. Therefore, along with the growth of world terrorism, it is precisely revisionist tendencies that increase the “global disorder” in the understanding of the United States, directly threaten their world hegemony and national interests, and weaken the military potential of the United States in different regions of the world. This explains the need for a substantial correction of military doctrine.
      The list of "revisionist states" and, in general, US adversaries includes Russia. Moreover, according to the authors of the National Military Strategy, the Russian Federation officially becomes the number one adversary for the United States.
      Russia is directly accused of striving to regain its former sovereign, otherwise, imperial status: an attempt to "revise key aspects of the international order" and, thus, actions that threaten US national security interests.
      “Russia, contributing to solving problems in certain security issues, such as the fight against drug trafficking and terrorism, at the same time has repeatedly demonstrated that it does not respect the sovereignty of neighboring countries and wants to use force to achieve its goals. Russian direct and covert hostilities undermine regional security. These actions violate numerous agreements in which Russia has committed itself to acting in accordance with international standards, in particular, in the UN Charter, the Helsinki Agreements, the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Russian Federation, Budapest Memorandum and Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles. ”
  25. sa-ag
    sa-ag 7 January 2016 17: 51
    +4
    Quote: NOC-VVS
    guys and what is happening then?

    Well, in my opinion, the movement of African Americans for equal rights, which was born with Martin Luther King, came to its logical conclusion, the representative of African Americans took the highest state post and achieved nothing, it was with him that his fellow tribesmen were killed in Ferguson and there was nothing
  26. mr.vasilievich
    mr.vasilievich 7 January 2016 23: 05
    +2
    Well, instead of one "barrack", another will come, and nothing in US policy will change.
  27. Vega
    Vega 7 January 2016 23: 08
    +2
    Which changes? A new freewheel will come and start twisting its tail in a new way, otherwise the tail will be pinched. While the authorities have big money, the policy will not change.
  28. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 8 January 2016 11: 59
    +2
    Russia should not wait for warming from America (and we don’t need it)
    Because the pre-election rhetoric of all candidates for the presidency of the United States is anti-Russian. We do not take Trump into account because this is a quality jester.
  29. biplan
    biplan 8 January 2016 12: 05
    +1
    According to a Levada Center survey, about 70% of Russians have a negative attitude towards the United States, but the number of Russians who want to move to America is higher than ever, Bloomberg writes.

    The US State Department claims that this year about 265 thousand Russians applied for a green card, although only 4 thousand such certificates are issued to Russia annually.
  30. KryoWarrior1978
    KryoWarrior1978 8 January 2016 13: 59
    +3
    Need to work. Put things in order at home, and above all in your head, without looking at what is overseas.
  31. Chidoryan
    Chidoryan 8 January 2016 18: 25
    +1
    Obama is not as creepy as you paint here. For all its shoals, it’s not the most bloodthirsty (it’s obviously not George W. Bush or Ivan the Terrible), besides, it’s necessary to somehow support the image of a peacemaker (yes, no matter how you hoot, but Nobel’s in his pocket). So do not rush into it with bananas, as some deputies and the majority of the population of Russia do when comparing them with a monkey (and this is still in Ukraine, you see, fascism! Huh), other democrats evaluate our foreign policy even more negatively. I am generally silent about the Republicans, these would have immediately armed Ukrainians and rebels in Syria. Moreover, the latter by such means that we would not be able to bomb anyone. Of course, I understand the power of our propaganda in the spirit of Uncle Goebels, but you must have your own head on your shoulders, gentlemen and comrades.
  32. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 9 January 2016 01: 08
    +2
    US Presidents are puppets. They do not solve anything. Any attempt at independence is immediately punished. Reagan was hurt. Kennedy was killed. There are other examples. That's the problem.
    1. Yak28
      Yak28 9 January 2016 07: 24
      +2
      So it should be, but with us the fate of the country depends on one person, a normal president is lucky, not a normal kapets country
  33. robbihood
    robbihood 9 January 2016 11: 15
    +3
    Quote: Yak28
    So it should be, but with us the fate of the country depends on one person, a normal president is lucky, not a normal kapets country

    Because since ancient Greece, in democratic countries, with an elected government, the elected leader is a hired worker, and according to the Russian tradition, and the Belarusian one - "you are the boss - I'm a fool .... k". What is not right.
  34. ltc35
    ltc35 9 January 2016 20: 25
    +1
    In fact, nothing will change from a change of president in the states. Everything is influenced by the specific situation at the moment. We, for some reason, are now promoting Mr. Trump. But this does not mean at all that when Putin won, he would cuddle with him, as with his own. Believe me: Trump is still that dark horse! Those who put it know a lot in the long run.
  35. Elena2013
    Elena2013 9 January 2016 22: 49
    0
    Watch the 1988 feature film They Live. Then a lot will become clear to you. good
  36. Elena2013
    Elena2013 10 January 2016 00: 21
    +1
    Quote: 0255
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Therefore, the collapse of Russia is extremely
    undesirable.

    So "undesirable" that the United States supported Chechen terrorists in 1994-2000, finance movements like "Siberia is not Russia" or "Ural is not Russia"? What do they dream of seeing Russia like this in the future?

    Somewhere else in 2010, I came across information that in 2012 there will be nothing, and a pole change is expected by 2030. One of the safest places will be the Siberian plain. The climate is changing on the planet. The ice age in Russia is ending. Crimean climate is expected. The Yankees know this, so they send their agents to Siberia to explore Siberia, who for some reason, under the guise of political asylum, settle in Siberia and the Urals.
    PS I remembered. The book is called "The World Inside Out". It says about the change of poles at the very end. The authors are our guys. soldier
  37. Avantageur
    Avantageur 10 January 2016 23: 05
    0
    For Russia, all this means the continuation of a consistent and implacable confrontation with the United States, which will develop regardless of whether high officials want to recognize its reality. It just so happened that the American state project could not move to a new level without the collapse of the Russian project, because not a single European or Asian country has its resources.

    We already know who our real enemy is. We are ready to repel any aggression. Whether it be external pro-US nuclear aggression, whether it be internal, liberal dirt ...
    1. Elena2013
      Elena2013 10 January 2016 23: 59
      0
      It should be reminded of the Illuminati tabletop game cards that were released in 1995. Oddly enough, but much develops precisely according to the scenario of those cards. Here are a couple of ominous examples:



      And this bacterium Cynthia now eats not only oil, but even alive people in the area of ​​the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Just like on the map.
      All maps with translation and comments can be viewed and downloaded here. The worst is just beginning.
      http://www.kpe.ru/sobytiya-i-mneniya/ocenka-tendencii-s-pozicii-kob/2112-illumin

      atus-end-games
  38. Elena2013
    Elena2013 11 January 2016 00: 10
    0
    There is a planned World War 3 and even control of people's consciousness through orbiting satellites sad