Approved updated strategy of national security of the Russian Federation

37
On the eve of the New Year, Vladimir Putin approved the updated strategy of the national security of the Russian Federation, the newspaper said Look with reference to the legal information portal.



"In accordance with federal laws of 28 December 2010 of the year No. 390-FZ" On Security "and 28 of June 2014, No. 172-FZ" On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation "I decide: to approve the enclosed National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation", - says in decree.

"The Russian Federation is interested in building a full-fledged partnership with the United States of America on the basis of coinciding interests, including in the economic sphere, and taking into account the key influence of Russian-American relations on the state of the international situation as a whole," the strategy notes.

“The network of US military biological laboratories is expanding in the territories of states neighboring Russia,” the document states and stresses that “the risk of the spread and use of chemical weaponsas well as the uncertainty about the facts of the possession of foreign countries of biological weapons, their availability of potential for its development and production. ”

“In international relations, the role of the force factor is not reduced. The desire to build up and modernize offensive weapons, to create and deploy new types of them weakens the global security system, as well as the system of treaties and agreements in the field of arms control ... In the regions neighboring Russia, militarization and the arms race are developing, ”the document says .

"Increasing the power potential of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and endowing it with global functions implemented in violation of international law, intensifying the military activities of the bloc countries, further expanding the alliance, bringing its military infrastructure to the Russian borders creates a threat to national security," .

It is noted that "the increasing influence of political factors on economic processes, as well as attempts by individual states to apply economic methods, instruments of financial, trade, investment and technology policies to solve their geopolitical tasks weaken the stability of the system of international economic relations."

“Against the background of structural imbalances in the global economy and financial system, growing sovereign debt, energy market volatility, there remains a high risk of recurrence of large-scale financial and economic crises,” the document says.

In the text of the previous strategy, the main threats were called “intelligence activities of foreign special services, attempts to forcibly change the foundations of the constitutional system and disorganization of state power, nationalist, religious and ethnic extremism and attempts to violate the unity and territorial integrity of Russia and destabilize the situation in the country, the activities of transnational criminal organizations and the growth of criminal offenses against the person and property, power, public and economic security. "

The updated document added “the activities of foreign and international non-governmental organizations, financial and economic structures and individuals aimed at disrupting the unity of Russia and destabilizing the country, including inspiring“ color revolutions ”, as well as destroying traditional spiritual values”.

The main threats to state security also include “the use of information and communication technologies to promote fascism, extremism, terrorism and separatism, and harm civil peace, political and social stability.”

Corruption is also recognized as a threat - in the current document it is placed in a separate paragraph.

The list also includes natural disasters, including those related to global climate change, deterioration of the technical condition of the infrastructure, and the occurrence of fires.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    3 January 2016 08: 45
    Everything about the case is short and clear.
    1. +9
      3 January 2016 09: 09
      From the text of the article
      Corruption is also recognized as a threat - in the current document it is placed in a separate paragraph.

      It has long been time to recognize corruption as a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation and to attach special importance to the fight against it.
      1. +4
        3 January 2016 09: 28
        Quote: Tatiana
        It was high time to recognize corruption as a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation

        So far, only in words, basically. We understand that many dominated pigs will not vote against the trough am
      2. +3
        3 January 2016 11: 56
        Aha Serdyukov and Vasilyeva are shaking in UzhOs.
        1. +5
          3 January 2016 13: 15
          Well, Serdyukov and Vasilyeva were primarily engaged in chemists. They destroyed military schools in Saratov, by the way, the only thing was biological and chemical protection, and the academy was "transferred" to Kostroma, having previously dispersed the local command Kostroma. In general, "... your favorite city can sleep well." Now practice near Saratov - theory in Kostroma. Bravo State Department.
        2. +1
          3 January 2016 13: 15
          Well, Serdyukov and Vasilyeva were primarily engaged in chemists. They destroyed military schools in Saratov, by the way, the only thing was biological and chemical protection, and the academy was "transferred" to Kostroma, having previously dispersed the local command Kostroma. In general, "... your favorite city can sleep well." Now practice near Saratov - theory in Kostroma. Bravo State Department.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. -3
        3 January 2016 11: 07
        Quote: Skif83
        What's up? And what is short?

        And what is not the case, and where that is smeared. What a hysteria, list for example each of the accidents on the roads. It is said about the directions in which we are being attacked. Attack usa? Who doesn’t know, do you propose starting a nuclear attack? For output speed from pressure and dependencies. Our climb reminds me of scrambling out of a hole with shit, where we were dumped in the 90s. Slippery, dirty, smelly. Excess movement threatens to lose traction (slip) and roll back. But get out, slowly and surely. So let’s without tantrums and common words.
        1. +1
          3 January 2016 17: 22
          Your post reminds me of a statement by EBN about the further movement of Russia, that we climb out, slowly, crawl, etc.
          Only now where we crawl - did not say.
          Are you afraid of excess movements with loss of adhesion? It is familiar! Especially on the activities of Medvedev.
          1. 0
            4 January 2016 07: 22
            Quote: Saratoga833
            Your post reminds me of a statement by EBN about the further movement of Russia, that we climb out, slowly, crawl, etc.
            Only now where we crawl - did not say.
            Are you afraid of excess movements with loss of adhesion? It is familiar! Especially on the activities of Medvedev.

            I said out of shit. And I'm afraid to be in it again (loss of adhesion), and they are extra movements. Familiar, some like to turn everything inside out.
    3. +1
      3 January 2016 13: 26
      "The Russian Federation is interested" and so on and so, well, as long as possible, the main threat today is a stupid monkey who has not seen life and who was given a nuclear grenade in his hands, who does not understand that his country can be torn to shreds and more who never fought on his own land, but then the survivors will curse him. I think that after such a monkey, the people of America are unlikely to ever choose such a black bastard.
      1. 0
        3 January 2016 17: 57
        Quote: SAXA.SHURA
        I think that after such a monkey, the people of America are unlikely to choose such a black bastard for themselves.


        What is the better "white" Parashenko with Yaytsenyukh? What are they doing with the people in Ukraine?
  2. +6
    3 January 2016 08: 47
    Threats and corruption recognized

    Enemy of the people number 1.
    1. +17
      3 January 2016 08: 52
      Yes, I also noticed. This will now be equated with a threat to national security. Like a terrorist in essence. Maybe even one hang. Crude, of course, but it is high time to introduce the death penalty against such. Pen, hear ... I’ve earned less for the whole life.
    2. +1
      3 January 2016 08: 54
      Threat recognized as corruption - in current document it is displayed in a separate paragraph.


      And how should it be ?!
      A threat has also been recognized as corruption - it has been eliminated.

      hi
      1. +7
        3 January 2016 08: 59
        Quote: yuriy55
        This will now be equated with a threat to national security.


        - "Bees against honey" ... in spite of any scribbles, Serdyukov is still on horseback, Vasilyeva has "rewound" such a monstrous time that now even a child knows that it is necessary to steal in billions, at the Vostochny cosmodrome it is still a hell of a situation with salaries, the billions allocated to him and so on, in the same spirit, "did not reach" the Crimea.
  3. 0
    3 January 2016 08: 50
    building a full-fledged partnership with the United States of America on the basis of coinciding interests, including in the economic sphere, and taking into account the key influence of Russian-American relations on the state of the international situation as a whole

    Relations between Russia and the United States at the moment have again become decisive for the entire territory of our planet, it is useful to take into account and not particularly worry about all kinds of little things, as if we would not like otherwise.
    1. +1
      3 January 2016 08: 59
      Quote: venaya
      Relations between Russia and the USA at the moment have again become decisive for the entire territory of our planet, it is useful to consider ...


      In relations between the United States and Russia, the visible and audible military power of the Russian Armed Forces has become decisive. And this poses the United States some questions about its own capabilities to exalt its state interests in solving world problems, ignoring international law and the right of countries to develop themselves ...
      hi
    2. +1
      3 January 2016 09: 18
      But here it’s not clear .. (politics or something ...) ... We have diametrically divergent goals with us. We have a PROSPERING RUSSIA, they have a third world country. What interests can there be with liars and provocateurs?
      Quote: venaya
      building a full-fledged partnership with the United States of America on the basis of coinciding interests, including in the economic sphere, and taking into account the key influence of Russian-American relations on the state of the international situation as a whole

      Relations between Russia and the United States at the moment have again become decisive for the entire territory of our planet, it is useful to take into account and not particularly worry about all kinds of little things, as if we would not like otherwise.
  4. +2
    3 January 2016 08: 58
    Has the Great Purge begun in the country? God grant ...
    1. +10
      3 January 2016 09: 04
      This is Little Purge. Shoe uniform. The Great Purge will begin when the monument to E. Gaidar is demolished, the Yeltsin Center is closed and Chubais is planted ...
      laughing
      1. +6
        3 January 2016 10: 30
        yuriy55-the day when they plant Chubais, Atlantis will pop up.
        1. +4
          3 January 2016 11: 05
          How to look at Atlantis laughing
  5. +13
    3 January 2016 08: 59
    "The Russian Federation is interested in building a full-fledged partnership with the United States of America on the basis of coinciding interests, including in the economic sphere, and taking into account the key influence of Russian-American relations on the state of the international situation as a whole," the strategy notes.


    But I'm not interested in this ... and I will explain why.
    When building economic relations with the United States, we at the same time expose ourselves to all kinds of US sanctions when political disagreements between our countries escalate ... it is dangerous to deal with such partners they are very unreliable in this regard.

    Further, Washington does not consider RUSSIA to be an equal partner for they have proclaimed themselves to be the exclusive nation in the world ... which means we will always try to make us vassals of the USA .... which is fundamentally unacceptable to either of my people.

    It means a conflict ... it means a contradiction and it will only grow ... The USA does not abandon its policy of hegemony.
    This is the reality today.
  6. +8
    3 January 2016 09: 00
    National security is based on economic security, but I did not see this in the Strategy.
    Or will we wait for the price of oil, and with it the growth of the economy?
    It's a shame, damn it.
  7. +4
    3 January 2016 09: 02
    Frequently changing strategies indicate the absence thereof.
    1. -1
      3 January 2016 09: 05
      It is supposed to update every six years ...
    2. +1
      3 January 2016 11: 58
      Quote: Stinger
      Frequently changing strategies indicate the absence thereof.

      Not "frequently changing", but expanded and supplemented, taking into account emerging threats and new methods of influence from a potential adversary, undermining the state basis.
      It is clear that Russia and the United States never squeeze each other in fraternal embrace. The West has been trying to ruin Russia for 300 years, digesting it in parts. It is clear that in the foreseeable future the Anglo-Saxons are not going to abandon this strategy.
      For almost a quarter of a century, Russia tried to integrate into the Western model of development, but did not become an ally for the West and still played the role of a "horror story" for "progressive" humanity, despite the fact that it conscientiously cut military equipment for scrap metal, gave the United States for a pittance practically the entire reserve of enriched uranium, ceded the domestic market for their goods, almost destroying their producer and built its financial system in their image and likeness, annually investing billions of dollars in their economy, refusing to finance the development of their industry. It turned out - not for the horse feed and we will not become our own there. Hence the change in strategy; - a pivot to the East and the beginning of the restoration of its independence and sovereignty, much to the chagrin of the liberal-pro-Western elite. Slowly, but the process went on. I hope that relations with the "partners" will develop not to the detriment of Russia, but as stated in the Strategy - "" "" "The Russian Federation is interested in building a full partnership with the united states of america based on concurring interests, including in the economic sphere, and taking into account the key influence of Russian-American relations on the state of the international situation as a whole "" "" ... The key word is "coinciding", not "imposed"
  8. +7
    3 January 2016 09: 02
    The activities of the "fifth column" should also be included among the main threats to Russia's national security.
    1. +5
      3 January 2016 09: 16
      What do you mean!
      Are you proposing to "choke" Echo of Moscow, the main mouthpiece of the liberals? But Echo is part of the Gazprommedia holding. And this holding is a part of Gazprom, where Miller and Zubkov (who is the father-in-law of the unforgettable Serdyukov) rule.
      It is impossible so. What if liberals will be distorted into patriots?

      Just kidding, but almost through tears of anger. And we are told that Gazprom is a national treasure.
      hi
      1. 0
        3 January 2016 09: 45
        ... so let this "mouthpiece" in Gazprommedia stick out and live on the money that is allocated to it from the holding, and not on imported sponsorship ... accordingly, it is much more convenient to control it and shut it up when necessary it will be easier ...
  9. +2
    3 January 2016 09: 06
    I would like a real elimination of some threats, or at least, decisions on the degree of their significance for Russia's security.
  10. +2
    3 January 2016 09: 29
    That's right - first you need to call a spade a spade, and then start acting in accordance with the intended guidelines. So that no one would have stupid and perplexed questions.
  11. +3
    3 January 2016 09: 47
    The main danger for Russia I consider the cult of consumption imposed by advertising. It is considered prestigious to have an expensive foreign car. Imagine a Japanese who dreams of a foreign car !!! there are no such. Or a Toyota employee who drives a Nissan ?? If it is prestigious to buy domestic, then poher to America
    1. -1
      3 January 2016 22: 01
      You, too, decided to look at Atlantis? I don’t even know what is more likely in this life to landing Chubais or AvtoVAZ - a competitor to the Japanese auto industry laughing But seriously, as long as AvtoVAZ does not publicly shoot the entire management and carry out a complete technical re-equipment of not only the "conveyor" but also of all related industries, nothing will get off the ground. There would still be production discipline to tighten up so that the OTK would work like in Germany or in the same Japan ... Oh, we can't see Atlantis ...
  12. 0
    3 January 2016 10: 22
    Quote: Skif83
    What's up? And what is short?
    What is the ring around Russia shrinking? What compresses it exactly the USA?
    And what exactly are they "partners" with us, and we will get out of our skin to become ... "partners"?

    It’s impossible to provoke the enemy, who is our main enemy and it’s clear without written on paper. As long as they are stronger militarily and economically, one must be careful.
  13. -1
    3 January 2016 11: 53
    It’s harder and tougher to be Russia in the international arena, and not to perform ballet swan lake. You can of course portray the puete ... the red-crowned crane ... but do not forget that when the hostile forces creep in from the outside, instantly go to the puete .. .. the bear frolics ...
  14. 0
    3 January 2016 12: 02
    Don Quixote and windmills, but from Vasilyev, Serdyukov and a bunch of other figures ???
  15. 0
    4 January 2016 12: 07
    "Activities of foreign and international non-governmental organizations, financial and economic structures and individuals aimed at disrupting the unity of Russia and destabilizing the country, including instigating" color revolutions ", as well as destroying traditional spiritual values."

    This is indeed the world's most serious threat to the statehood of non-NATO countries and not only Russia!

    The main threats to state security also include “the use of information and communication technologies to promote fascism, extremism, terrorism and separatism, and harm civil peace, political and social stability.”

    It’s hard to stop such propaganda, and send propagandists to polar bears, even if they are told about fascism, they will surely be imbued!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"