Military Review

Why the West will never win or forgive Russia (Agora Vox, France)

283
Why the West will never win or forgive Russia (Agora Vox, France)



В historical perspective, Russia intuitively fought for the survival of all mankind. Of course, events are far from always presented in this way. Be that as it may, this huge country has repeatedly resisted the most powerful forces of evil, which became a threat to the very existence of our planet.

During World War II, the Soviet (mostly Russian) people sacrificed at least 25 of millions of men, women and children for the victory over Nazism. No other country in modern history has had to go through such trials.

Immediately after this victory, Russia, along with China, Cuba and then launched the most incredible and noble project of all time: the systematic destruction of Western colonialism. Worldwide oppressed masses rose up against European and North American barbarity, while the Soviet Union was ready to become a beacon of hope for them, to provide substantial financial, ideological and military aid.

As the oppressed and deprived nations gained independence one by one, hatred of the Soviet Union and the Russian people grew in all capitals of the Western world. After all, the plundering of "non-white" continents was considered the natural right of the "civilized world."

In the United States and Europe, words like “colonialism” and “imperialism” quickly acquired an extremely negative connotation, at least outwardly. Therefore, it would be counterproductive to demonize the USSR (and even less to attack it) for supporting the liberation struggle on all those continents. Instead, developed theories about the "Empire of Evil."

Russia has always been an "obstacle." This colossal country interfered with the cruel plans of Washington, Berlin, London and Paris. Plans on how to take control and plunder the whole world.

But the good deeds, the dirtier the attacks on them.

Russia has always stood an incredible ability to mobilize their forces to throw all the resources to achieve a single, deeply humanistic and moral purpose. In its struggle it has always been something sacred, something high and extremely important.

“Get up, great country, Get up for a mortal battle!” This is how one of the greatest patriotic songs of World War II begins. When Russia fights, only victory is important for it. At any price.

Russia was destined to fight for the whole world by fate. If you do not believe in fate, you will never understand the famous "Russian soul". The point here is not in religion: Russia is for the most part anarchic and atheistic. But she believes in fate and accepts it.

In addition, in most cases, Russia has little choice. The alternative to victory was only the end of humanity. And when the very existence of the world was threatened, Russia always rose - fierce and frightening, but at the same time incredibly beautiful in its anger and determination. She fought with every handful of her land, with every heart of her people. And almost always won. But at a terrible price - burying millions of sons and daughters and plunging into the sea of ​​unimaginable sadness and pain.


And next has never been anyone who comforted her. So far, the fires raged until the faces bereaved mothers and wives have not yet had time to dry tears, to have spit upon, mocked and humiliated treacherous Western regimes and their propaganda.

Her heroism belittled, mocked the victims. It was alleged that he gave his life for mankind millions actually died for nothing.
In exchange for the heroism of the Russian did not ask for anything, except for two basic things: recognition and respect. But I never received either one or the other.
Now Russia is again rising, begins the epic struggle with the IG, a monstrous parody of the Muslim faith, which creates and armed the West and its regional angry hangers.

Russia was forced to act. After all, if it is not, then who? After centuries of the Crusades and colonialism terrifying West from the Middle East, one of the cradles of our civilization is almost nothing left. Stripped and humiliated by the Middle East has become a mosaic of miserable standing in the service of Western client states. Tens of millions were killed. All that can be looted. The socialist and secular governments are pressed to the wall and toppled.

I worked a lot in this region and I can attest that, perhaps, the exception of Africa, in the world there will be no more victims of greed and barbarism of the West.

Syria and Iraq, two desperate, suffered mortally wounded country, appealed to Russia for help. And she agreed.

Yes, of course, I already hear this cacophony of voices voicing from Europe and North America about “Russian interests” and “sphere of influence”. Because in the West there is nothing sacred. And it can not be in principle. Because gloomy sarcasm and nihilism are mixed with everything ... If the West behaves like a thug, the picture of the rest of the world also needs to be painted in the same colors and shades. In the end, the West has no allies, no feelings. Interests only. It was not I who invented it, they told me about it again and again when I lived and worked in the ruined corners of Africa.

But I do not care what they say in Paris and Washington. What matters is what they say in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. And I will explain to you how things are there: if you go to the barber and say that you are Russian, the people will rise, embrace you and wept.

Russia will never attack other countries, but if she herself comes under attack, her rage can be terrifying, especially during a war. “Whoever comes to us with a sword, will die of the sword!” Said the Prince of Novgorod Alexander Nevsky in the 13th century.

The recent incident with the Russian bomber that was shot down over Syria, the Turkish Air Force, increases the risk of a wider regional war.
Turkey, a NATO member country, spreading terror throughout the region: from Libya and Somalia to Iraq, Syria and its own Kurdish territories. She tries people destroys a lot of people (including journalists), robs millions of their natural resources and dissipates (mostly on the money Qatar) the most that neither is extremist Islamist teachings.

I met Recep Tayyip Erdogan many years ago, at the beginning of the 1990s in Istanbul, when he was still the mayor of the city, and I “licked my wounds” after publishing how the West systematically destroyed Yugoslavia.

“Do you speak Turkish?” He asked me somehow. “Not very well,” I replied. - Little".

“But you know perfectly well how to pronounce the name of our party! He exclaimed. “It proves how important we are.”

From the very first meeting, I realized that he was an aggressive bastard with megalomania and an inferiority complex. But it never occurred to me that he would go that far. And he could. And it affects millions of people across the region.

Now he has brought down a Russian bomber and invaded Iraq.

Turkey has repeatedly fought with Russia and almost always loses. And in the period between the two world wars, she was able to survive only with the help of the Soviet Union. Therefore, it would be worth to think twice the next step.

Russia is not just "leading the war." Her struggle for the survival of humanity is nothing but a work of art, poetry, a symphony. It's hard to explain, but true. Everything is intertwined.

It is mean to knock down the Russian Su-24 - the same as spitting on the graves of 25 for the millions who died in World War II. This is a disgusting and stupid step. In Russia, this is not done. If you want to fight, fight face to face.

But if you kill, like a coward, invades devastated neighboring countries, once you can see in the sky is not the Su-24, and heavy bombers.

Russia can not win. There are many reasons. One of them is very pragmatic: it is a nuclear superpower. The second is that it usually is fighting for a just cause. And he does it with all his might and with all your heart.

If it were not for Russia, the planet Earth would no longer exist. At least, in the form in which we are accustomed to see it. The West and its fascist Christian states would completely control the world. And the “nedonaroda” would be treated like animals (even worse than now): there would be no boundaries, limits to theft and destruction.

The so-called "civilized world" (the one that builds its theaters and schools on the bones of others) without the slightest resistance would go to full control over our planet.

Fortunately, there is Russia. And it can not be beat. And that never, no one will. The West would never forgive her for what she stood to the side of the poor and oppressed.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/international/article/pourquoi-l-occident-ne-pourra-175848
283 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Eugene-Eugene
    Eugene-Eugene 3 January 2016 19: 05 New
    93
    Because they once in 100 years are going to grab shchi.
    1. Esso
      Esso 3 January 2016 19: 10 New
      37
      But after all, they are naturally taken away from us ...
      1. Proxima
        Proxima 3 January 2016 19: 24 New
        95
        It seems to me that the main reason for the aggression of the West towards Russia is that we are not like them. They cannot count us, therefore we are unpredictable for them, and therefore dangerous. So it was, and unfortunately, it will be so.
        1. Old Schweik
          Old Schweik 3 January 2016 19: 55 New
          53
          I agree. We are aliens for them. And they are for us primates in a cage.
          1. Oleg14774
            Oleg14774 3 January 2016 21: 06 New
            -155
            Quote: Old Schweik
            I agree. We are aliens for them. And they are for us primates in a cage.

            Oh! We love to praise ourselves and toss our hats! Do not feed bread! A kind of sitting on the couch and dare to whip!
            1. Eugene-Eugene
              Eugene-Eugene 3 January 2016 21: 16 New
              16
              cut the map on Ava, olezhka, and you will be respected
              1. nadezhiva
                nadezhiva 3 January 2016 22: 19 New
                57
                The question is not in reductions, but in the angle of view wink I like the world map used in the States. How they did not reach schizophrenia from such an angle is a mystery.
                The terrible and huge Russia surrounds the small States from the west and from the east.
                Well, and above the world map for Australia, in principle, only the very lazy did not laugh.
                1. pofigisst74
                  pofigisst74 3 January 2016 23: 10 New
                  +6
                  In fairness, find on the internet maps of the world, as they see them in Australia and South Africa. there everything is upside down! wink
                  1. kirpich
                    kirpich 3 January 2016 23: 55 New
                    +2
                    So they were always called "ANTIPODES" T, e, people who walk upside down wink Even V.S. Vysotsky has such a song.
                2. nadezhiva
                  nadezhiva 3 January 2016 23: 15 New
                  32
                  World map for Australia. Here is an example "upside down" and a visual explanation of why they hate and are afraid of Russia to the point of kondrazhki, while amuse themselves with the illusion that they can pile on us all en masse.
                  1. Chera
                    Chera 5 January 2016 15: 19 New
                    +1
                    Well, so the relatives went further ...
                    https://yandex.ru/images/search?img_url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.qrz.ru%2Fattachments%
                    2Fpozyvnye%2F56221d1315743722-aziopa-globus_ukraini-1.jpg&text=%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B
                    E%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%81%20%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8B&noreask=1&pos=3
                    & lr = 35 & rpt = simage
                3. Shiva83483
                  Shiva83483 4 January 2016 03: 46 New
                  +3
                  They have such a life ... and not figs on OUR, Afghan land to run ....
                4. Aandrewsir
                  Aandrewsir 4 January 2016 13: 24 New
                  +4
                  Well-ooh ... "Of course" ... the USA is in the center of the World, and the rest are around. And Russia "aggressively surrounds them"! And the whole world around is the "zone of American interests"!
                  1. LeftPers
                    LeftPers 4 January 2016 14: 18 New
                    +4
                    Exactly) is very reminiscent of an old anecdote, where the old major enters a standing skating rink, and a pocket cop knocks out the readings from the tractor driver from the skating rink: "tell me how you overtook it, cut it and passed it back."
                5. Foxmara
                  Foxmara 5 January 2016 09: 56 New
                  0
                  Quote: nadezhiva
                  The terrible and huge Russia surrounds the small States from the west and from the east.

                  Now it’s clear why they need so many bases around us. They are simply afraid of us. Demand to surrender or what? Anyway, we surrounded them.
            2. avva2012
              avva2012 3 January 2016 21: 16 New
              27
              Well, who else will praise? Or not at all? Especially nice to read, a, opinion from a foreigner. We, after all, not so long ago, were engaged in self-flagellation. Enough, I think. Eat your own, now, do not choke yourself, gentlemen Europeans.
              1. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky 4 January 2016 00: 31 New
                44
                Quote: avva2012
                Well, who else will praise? Or not at all? Especially nice to read, a, opinion from a foreigner.

                And not only in Europe there are sane people. The Middle East also appreciated us
              2. V.ic
                V.ic 4 January 2016 17: 05 New
                +1
                Quote: avva2012
                It is even more pleasant to read such an opinion from a foreigner.

                It may be / ethnic / Serb, or maybe Slovak or Czech (the latter is hard to believe, reading about their valiant work to supply the Third Reich).
                1. avva2012
                  avva2012 4 January 2016 17: 15 New
                  +2
                  What difference does it make, colleague. Barclay de Tolly, quite a foreigner. The main thing is that despite brainwashing, thinking people appear in the West.
            3. Starik72
              Starik72 3 January 2016 21: 42 New
              10
              Well, it’s in vain that you Oleg 147741 throw such words! Think carefully, I won’t tell you what to do next, decide for yourself. And for your statement, I put you minus.
            4. Hardy
              Hardy 3 January 2016 22: 13 New
              -103
              Quote: Oleg147741

              Oh! We love to praise ourselves and toss our hats! Do not feed bread! A kind of sitting on the couch and dare to whip!

              No, well, they’re not just sitting on the couch. They act !!! Cons give out pluses)))))
              Judging by the number of pluses to this article, one of the eternal Russian troubles with us for a long time ...
              1. EvgNik
                EvgNik 4 January 2016 05: 10 New
                23
                Judging by the comments (yours) - this is your trouble with Oleg.
                Quote: Hardy
                No, well, they’re not just sitting on the couch. They act !!! Cons with pros hand out
              2. Ros 56
                Ros 56 4 January 2016 11: 15 New
                +7
                And you probably wrote this nonsense while sitting on a tank or in the cockpit of a fighter?
              3. excomandante
                excomandante 4 January 2016 12: 57 New
                +3
                You write, fiercely fighting as a DAISHAK, on ​​the boot of a murdered lover?
              4. dzeredzavkomimu
                dzeredzavkomimu 5 January 2016 03: 29 New
                0
                with you for a long time? Russian troubles? you are not philosophers by chance? or under .. rain .. often run?
            5. torkov66
              torkov66 3 January 2016 23: 57 New
              38
              Yes, we just don’t forget that when the time comes, we will get up from the sofas and all your piderastic pindovy shoble, we will make kirdyk ...
              1. Hardy
                Hardy 4 January 2016 02: 45 New
                -63
                Quote: torkov66
                Yes, we just don’t forget that when the time comes, we will get up from the sofas and all your piderastic pindovy shoble, we will make kirdyk ...

                Aaaa, so the hour has not come yet))))))) The country was divided into parts, turned into "banana republics", everything valuable is exported for nothing, our children are being prepared for the West right away, but the hour has not yet come)))) Why- when Hitler attacked, he immediately came.
                Let us remember what Hitler wanted from Stalin's speech "To Victory over Germany on May 9, 1945":
                "Hitler publicly declared that his task was to dismember the Soviet Union and to sever the Caucasus, Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic states and other regions from it. He bluntly stated:" We will destroy Russia so that it can never rise again. "

                Did not Hitler's dreams come true? Explain to me why you are so proud here, when everything that is possible, are we already ready? And when will this treasured hour come, when will you get up from the sofas?))))))
                -----------------------
                Special thanks for the minuses, from such couch "patriots" they are more expensive than thousands of pluses)))) There was still not enough to be confused with the local couch "generals" here)))
                1. shuhartred
                  shuhartred 4 January 2016 03: 13 New
                  23
                  Quote: Hardy
                  And when will this treasured hour come, when will you get up from the sofas?))))))

                  And you probably already got up and rush into battle waving your saber? Or are you one of those who "the whole world is in dust"?
                  Quote: Hardy
                  Did not Hitler's dreams come true?

                  No, not fulfilled. Russia is not destroyed this time, and two you do not know well the goals of Germany in the "eastern campaign". The main task at the first stage was to enter the Arkhangelsk-Astrakhan line and gain a foothold on it along the Ural Mountains. Something I do not see NATO bases in the Urals.
                  1. Hardy
                    Hardy 4 January 2016 03: 22 New
                    -42
                    Quote: shuhartred
                    b and gain a foothold on it in the Ural Mountains. Something I do not see NATO bases in the Urals.

                    Naive)))) Yes, we ourselves asked for NATO, but they didn’t take us))) Because we are not a country for them, but a developed territory)))) They already have everything here))))) Even if formally the owner with a Russian passport, then he and his family have long been living in the west)))
                    Ukraine, too, is not taken into NATO, just like Georgia ... doesn’t it suggest any thoughts?))))
                    1. vovanpain
                      vovanpain 4 January 2016 09: 44 New
                      19
                      Quote: Hardy
                      Yes, we ourselves asked for NATO, but they didn’t take us))

                      Here you are my dear, and upset because of this and rush here at all.
                      Quote: Hardy
                      what can we already do?

                      Who pissed off something? Can be more detailed and less emotionally sweetheart.
                      Quote: Hardy
                      Judging by the number of pluses to this article, one of the eternal Russian troubles with us for a long time ...

                      With whom it is with us, it’s disgusting to be dear to us on one hectare. hi
                      1. Hardy
                        Hardy 4 January 2016 12: 12 New
                        -22
                        Quote: vovanpain

                        With whom it is with us, it’s disgusting to be dear to us on one hectare. hi

                        And I'm funny with you)))))

                        I received an interesting letter, I will answer here, of course, without specifying the addressee:

                        why argue? here is the same as on the censor. this is typical Slavic chauvinism! as soon as someone says something wrong, the enemy will immediately, when someone messes up they will refuse yesterday’s words and even mix up their brother with shit. Therefore, they don’t like Russians where people don’t live. Not a permanent ethnic group! Sorry if you are Russian and something offended.

                        I do not argue, I am a troll)))))
                        And where does the nationality and chauvinism. Russian people were launched into space, made a lot of discoveries and inventions that have become the property of all mankind.
                        And Russian fools are apparently a consequence of the law of nature, that if they arrive in one place, then they disappear in another)))) A large number of fools is a sign of the nation’s high brain diversity. The more of them, the more geniuses. But even in fools there is an interesting grain, they don’t tear their asses for themselves, they want to make everyone happy, to the best of their idea of ​​happiness))) Do not rob other nations or make slaves, but make happy, what is chauvinism? Yes, they will give the last shirt to another ... but they can also be killed by an excess of feelings ... fools)))))
                        ---------------------
                        "If someone else wanders in.
                        It will amaze the living creatures of the poor.
                        Our rare strength of heart
                        Yes, fool our evil-reserved. "
                      2. Diana Ilyina
                        Diana Ilyina 4 January 2016 14: 06 New
                        22
                        Quote: Hardy
                        I do not argue, I am a troll))))) And where does the nationality and chauvinism.


                        I’m just wondering, did the woman give birth to you ?! I was always wondering how, from the same children the woman gave birth to, they came from the same Matrosovs, Gastello, Zhukovs, Rokossovsky, Suvorovs, Nevsky, Susanins, Minins and Pozharsky, Komodemyansky, Kovpaki, Rumyantsevs, Nakhimovs, Potemkins, de Ribasy, Ushakovs, The Kornilovs, and hundreds of thousands, there are no millions, ordinary Ivanov, Alesandrov, and generally nameless soldiers of Russia, and from the others (almost the same ones) they got Vlasovs, krasnovs and .... (as I remembered no one else), others about which no one remembers the freaks that you are so eager to join Xia ?!
                      3. Hardy
                        Hardy 4 January 2016 16: 30 New
                        -11
                        Quote: Diana Ilyina
                        others, about which no one remembers the freaks that you are so eager to join ?!

                        How many emotions and hatred))) So far I try not to join the couch generals.
                        But essentially, what do you disagree with me? Do you think that Russia is not captured now, that we have something to be proud of? Believe that we are still hoo ... that only the time will come?)))))
                        It’s nothing that the USSR, contrary to the will of the citizens, shared that it’s now good to get a job at a German plant, that nothing belongs to the people, that Chubais is living, and most of the citizens live in poverty ... Do you like to believe in fairy tales that we are a superpower and are we making progress to humanity?)))) Even the tomato response to a downed plane doesn’t bother you?)))
                      4. avva2012
                        avva2012 4 January 2016 17: 24 New
                        +5
                        Why are you here on the couch and not in the trench? Who asked you with his hatred and devilry to come to the site? Enjoy from the outside. And the "downed plane", what are you talking about? What poverty, look at the street, the price of a car, what? Himself, you, soulful rogue.
                      5. Hardy
                        Hardy 4 January 2016 18: 32 New
                        -10
                        Quote: avva2012
                        Why are you here on the couch and not in the trench? Who asked you with his hatred and devilry to come to the site? Enjoy from the outside. And the "downed plane", what are you talking about? What poverty, look at the street, the price of a car, what? Himself, you, soulful rogue.

                        I do not quite understand what you wrote here, maybe for you the Russian language is not native. But I will try to answer.
                        Not in the trench because people like me in the rear are needed tongue
                        As for poverty ... this is of course a relative concept, but work is now a problem. I know many who have been laid off and they can no longer find work. Good only to those who work in Western firms.

                        And on the site I like to watch your friendly empty turbulence and self-praise, forgive me generously for this weakness wink
                        It is not clear just how much anger and hatred is in you for those who do not share your point of view. Perhaps you think that the more rude and emotional you answer, the more a patriot? Who taught you that you were right in proving?laughing
                        And with minuses and pluses it is generally something like adults. And most importantly, everything is so serious laughing )))))))))))))))
                    2. pilot67
                      pilot67 4 January 2016 19: 49 New
                      -3
                      But where were you at that time? I stood on Novosibirsk Square, though I only gave a bandage to take it as my own. If there were more patriots, then maybe we would get the guns and the authorities would support the referendum, not the capital.
                    3. Hardy
                      Hardy 4 January 2016 21: 24 New
                      +1
                      Quote: pilot67
                      But where were you at that time? I stood on Novosibirsk Square, though I only gave a bandage to take it as my own. If there were more patriots, then maybe we would get the guns and the authorities would support the referendum, not the capital.

                      Wow, I didn’t even hear that there were some popular actions against the collapse of the USSR. But I know how Shamil Basayev then transferred the weapons of our military units to Georgia ...
                      It's good that you didn’t get the trunks. At that time, I think there were no more chances to save the country. I remember how the USSR hated the republics. And Bandera already in Ukraine did not lurk. Moreover, even before Gorbachev’s arrival, it hung in the air, with him they were no longer afraid. Everything has rotted much earlier ...
                      We destroyed ourselves. They voted for the USSR, but nobody then believed in communist (or socialist) ideals. And this problem, the lack of a common idea, has not gone anywhere. And without a human idea, we are no different from the West, in the same way we live by instincts. The President, he wanted and divorced his wife ... But what, the body is more pleasant with the young)) Now everything is possible, whatever you want)))

                      I do not even assess how correct the idea of ​​communism was, this is certainly a controversial issue. But this was the first time in the history of mankind when people tried to build a society based on reason, and not on instinctive social behavior. And this fascinated many peoples. No, but an alternative to the "law of the jungle".

                      Now we have nothing to offer either to ourselves or to human civilization. A purely national idea based on religion after the USSR is too small. Therefore, the article and comments on it in no way ...

                      I don’t know what to do next and what to do, I have no answers. Adapt to the new world is not difficult, the law is simple, use the weak and do not get strong))) But he is somehow boring, nothing human remains. Who will now work for the sake of work, not money? Without an idea, this is pointless.

                      Well, here, on the forum, activists came up with a fairy tale and pounce on anyone who ruins their fantasies))) Let them have fun if it’s easier for them to live like that))))
                  2. co-creator
                    co-creator 6 January 2016 14: 58 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Hardy
                    How many emotions and hatred))) So far I try not to join the couch generals.

                    Where is the hatred seen? This is contempt, but you have hatred that you do not hide and call trolling.
                2. a housewife
                  a housewife 4 January 2016 16: 37 New
                  +7
                  Yes, just the year of the monkey has come. And some will not decide whether they are smart or beautiful. At the same time, they themselves ask for cons - well, do not offend the same and offended!
                3. avva2012
                  avva2012 4 January 2016 17: 30 New
                  +4
                  Irina, here's why, I like smart women, so they are also beautiful. Guys are just smart love Happy New Year!
              2. pilot67
                pilot67 4 January 2016 19: 44 New
                +3
                And I will answer you, all marshals, generals, etc. under avami simply. I am a simple military builder and my rank is a private. But I do not want such people to be in our ranks when the time comes to get up from the sofa, shame and shame on you " defenders of the homeland. "
            6. avva2012
              avva2012 4 January 2016 14: 13 New
              10
              Hardy, what can’t be taken from you, you are sincere ..:"And Russian fools are apparently a consequence of the law of nature that if they arrive in one place, they will decrease in another)))) A large number of fools is a sign of the high brain variability of a nation. The more of them, the more geniuses. But even fools have an interesting grain , they are not tearing their asses for themselves, they want to make everyone happy, to the best of their idea of ​​happiness))) "
              I would like to ask, are you an intellectual? That is, you all know better than the poor us? Apparently V.I. Lenin was a genius when he sent those like you with a "philosophical steamer" to where you all belong. Into nothing. You are not needed either here or there. And your fate, hanging between this and this world. In a long way.
            7. Alexey Lobanov
              Alexey Lobanov 4 January 2016 16: 05 New
              +9
              Quote: Hardy
              And Russian fools are apparently a consequence of the law of nature, that if they arrive in one place, then they disappear in another)))) A large number of fools is a sign of the nation’s high brain diversity.

              Dear, you will sober up tomorrow, read it and you will want to become small and inconspicuous. Bullshit! COMPLETE NONSENSE.
            8. Hardy
              Hardy 4 January 2016 17: 05 New
              -14
              Quote: Alexey Lobanov
              Bullshit! COMPLETE NONSENSE.

              Yes, some laws of nature also amaze me)))
              From an anthropological point of view, genius is a common deviation from the norm, which gave their wearer some advantages in his environment. Therefore, the more a nation gives birth to talented people, the more geeks will be, it’s obvious))) But geeks are also useful, they create a more varied environment where geniuses are again easier to show their qualities.
            9. Alexey Lobanov
              Alexey Lobanov 4 January 2016 19: 35 New
              +3
              Joseph Mengele in the flesh, saint ... wassat
        2. co-creator
          co-creator 6 January 2016 14: 56 New
          0
          Quote: Hardy
          I received an interesting letter, I will answer here, of course, without specifying the addressee
          I do not argue, I am a troll))))):

          He wrote, he answered. This is trolling. Well done. that admitted.
    2. IRINA-IRINA
      IRINA-IRINA 4 January 2016 21: 19 New
      +2
      Ukraine and Georgia deliberately climb into NATO, while Yeltsin made a proposal in the interval between boozes and did not coordinate with anyone, which no one even took seriously. Therefore, does not suggest thoughts ....
    3. dzeredzavkomimu
      dzeredzavkomimu 5 January 2016 03: 37 New
      0
      not us, but Yeltsin’s rule in NATO was pressing, I agree with the rest
      1. kartalovkolya
        kartalovkolya 5 January 2016 11: 33 New
        +2
        Well, on the occasion of joining NATO, do not take away this merit from Joseph Vissarionovich. After all, it was he who heard that NATO was being created "to strengthen peace" proposed to admit the USSR there and received a negative response, with which the West confirmed the anti-Soviet orientation of this bloc! And all the business, and Boriska's drunken nonsense is not worth remembering a lot of things he "put on"!
  • 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 4 January 2016 06: 17 New
    15
    Regarding "children for the West", you have correctly noted that. You are already prepared - a typical product.
  • Vanko
    Vanko 4 January 2016 10: 37 New
    +7
    [quote = Hardy] [quote = torkov66] Yes, we just do not forget that when the time comes, we will get up from the sofas and all your piderastic pindovy shoble, we will make kirdyk ... [/ quote]
    Aaaa, so the hour has not come yet))))))) The country was divided into parts, turned into "banana republics", everything valuable is exported for nothing, our children are being prepared for the West right away, but the hour has not yet come)))) Why- when Hitler attacked, he immediately came.
    Let us remember what Hitler wanted from Stalin's speech "To Victory over Germany on May 9, 1945":
    "Hitler publicly declared that his task was to dismember the Soviet Union and to sever the Caucasus, Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic states and other regions from it. He bluntly stated:" We will destroy Russia so that it can never rise again. "

    Did not Hitler's dreams come true? Explain to me why you are so proud here, when everything that is possible, are we already ready? And when will this treasured hour come, when will you get up from the sofas?))))))
    -----------------------
    "

    Hitler's dreams did not come true. And so far we have not lost all the polymers. And Russia is already rising from its knees. At least the berets already laced up.
  • Sergey Polt
    Sergey Polt 4 January 2016 11: 23 New
    +5
    Eh, VO does not allow obscene expression, but in any other way ...
  • Gorjelin
    Gorjelin 4 January 2016 11: 46 New
    +5
    Special thanks for the minuses, from such couch "patriots" they are more expensive than thousands of pluses)))) There was still not enough to be confused with the local couch "generals" here)))

    Yes, you campaign, great undivided "patriot", are very concerned about Hitler and his dreams, are you happy? What do you want to prove to yourself and to others?

    For such words, Stalin, whom you remembered, was right to the wall of traitors.
  • unsinkable
    unsinkable 4 January 2016 12: 17 New
    +7
    Quote: Hardy
    so that they confuse me here with the local sofa "generals")))

    My friend, for you * a couch general * is certainly not enough. You are undoubtedly MARSHAL, but not even a couch, but a clamshell. You are the best, but only from provocateurs. You are not successful, dear. fool negative
  • LeftPers
    LeftPers 4 January 2016 14: 23 New
    +5
    I put a minus from admiration for such stupidity and historical and political illiteracy. I haven't seen this for a long time. Is that from young hohlotroli in the comments to the program "Vesti".
  • dzeredzavkomimu
    dzeredzavkomimu 5 January 2016 03: 35 New
    +1
    do not confuse the concept of Homeland and State, I don’t digest Putin’s state, but I love Motherland-Russia, an article about the place of Russia in general, and not specifically what happened
  • oracul
    oracul 6 January 2016 08: 30 New
    0
    It is you and your kind "all that is possible ... ask .... whether" because they are not able to understand the obvious. But regardless of this, they take the liberty of judging everything with all the categorization worthy of another application.
  • zritel
    zritel 6 January 2016 11: 21 New
    0
    No need to BAM ... Himself shit or ask if you are seated sitting screen.
  • 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 4 January 2016 06: 11 New
    0
    So like the Frenchman writes, what do we mean? request
  • meriem1
    meriem1 4 January 2016 08: 31 New
    +7
    Quote: Oleg147741
    Quote: Old Schweik
    I agree. We are aliens for them. And they are for us primates in a cage.

    Oh! We love to praise ourselves and toss our hats! Do not feed bread! A kind of sitting on the couch and dare to whip!


    Better to praise yourself than to stick to the brown bolt in liberal ecstasy. And not to write WE !!! Sweetheart to yourself !!!! Just talk to yourself. We are not you!
  • Maj.
    Maj. 4 January 2016 09: 49 New
    -2
    Oleg, I agree with you. We are much to chat, and not only we, but also our kings. And then we have almost zero business. The country is rich in resources and brains, but we live like homeless people. To be honest, only the Stalin regime is suitable for us, then we will live, build, develop.
    1. unsinkable
      unsinkable 4 January 2016 12: 28 New
      +1
      Quote: major
      .And then we have almost zero.

      Do not hang sunflowers on the ears of sane people, army husks. negative
    2. pilot67
      pilot67 4 January 2016 20: 01 New
      0
      I agree with you, you need a solid hand. And in general, a blockage in the country. We’ve been building a cosmodrome for 30 years now, I’m talking about Vostochny. In 87-89 it was called Svobodny. And before that there was a missile part. mess. I need a solid hand. A dozen indicative shootings and landings with relatives and everything will be normal.
      1. kartalovkolya
        kartalovkolya 5 January 2016 11: 37 New
        -1
        Well, if so, let's start with you, dear "political scientist"!
  • Rom14
    Rom14 4 January 2016 11: 31 New
    +8
    I didn’t put you a minus, you have your own idea in the head of the People. And many who are here beat pro-Western ushlopkov ..., and Russia was a country of Goodness and will be, such is fate ..., I don’t even want to write about foreign creatures ... Ghouls.
  • Rom14
    Rom14 4 January 2016 11: 31 New
    0
    I didn’t put you a minus, you have your own idea in the head of the People. And many who are here beat pro-Western ushlopkov ..., and Russia was a country of Goodness and will be, such is fate ..., I don’t even want to write about foreign creatures ... Ghouls.
  • LeftPers
    LeftPers 4 January 2016 14: 13 New
    +3
    And what is not true in the author's article? In my opinion, everything is written correctly, from the heart, and there is no "hap-hap" and "self-praise"
  • Cherdak
    Cherdak 4 January 2016 20: 26 New
    0
    Men who always criticize others, not too high moral principles.

    From the article Which men should be avoided? http://love-911.ru/zhenskij-razdel/otnosheniya/lyubov/999-kakix-muzhchin-sleduet
    -izbegat.html
  • korsa
    korsa 6 January 2016 17: 01 New
    0
    I totally agree with you. It's scary. As before the Second World War "with little blood and on foreign territory"
  • zennon
    zennon 3 January 2016 21: 54 New
    23
    One of the most sensible articles that I have read in recent years. A young author. He is not just a singing parrot to order. He has an analysis, his own understanding of the events. Well, I can tell you Starina Shveik in response to yours:
    Quote: Old Schweik
    they are for us primates in a cage.

    You probably don’t know, but the primates detachment Primates was introduced by Karl Liney in the middle of the 18th century. In particular, it has a family of Hominidae hominids, including orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and humans. And people, Homo, are a kind of primates hominid families. It includes the species Homo sapiens, an intelligent man, and extinct species close to him. Well, to make it clear, people and monkeys make up a single family, which is part of the primacy squad. And in this squad there are many interesting representatives, about 400 species. Well, for example, Galago, Tamarins, Tupaya ... Here is meet-small Lori, the same primate as we are:
    1. Old Schweik
      Old Schweik 4 January 2016 16: 24 New
      +4
      Believe me, I know what primates are and what they eat with!)))
      That's why I called them that. They are not pigs (their order can be envied), not stupid Penguins (they have a high level of technology and industry) ... they are primates in a CAGE. In the cell of their false values ​​and liberal principles, as well as their eternal misconceptions about the Russian people and their destiny in the world deck of nations.
      1. zennon
        zennon 4 January 2016 19: 31 New
        0
        Quote: Old Schweik
        Believe me, I know what primates are and what they eat with!)))
        That's why I called them that. They are not pigs (their order can be envied), not stupid Penguins (they have a high level of technology and industry) ... they are primates in a CAGE. In the cell of their false values ​​and liberal principles, as well as their eternal misconceptions about the Russian people and their destiny in the world deck of nations.

        Well then, I'm sorry. And then I thought that another person was captive of their own misconceptions. It is not uncommon for citizens to oppose humans and monkeys, not suspecting what kind of relationship we are ...
  • ML-334
    ML-334 3 January 2016 22: 01 New
    12
    Old Schweik! We have a Creator God, they have God Darwin. They feel it at the genetic level, that's why they are furious.
  • anykin
    anykin 3 January 2016 19: 58 New
    -114
    This laudatory article is written by a typical modern European ((

    "It's not about religion: Russia is mostly anarchist and atheistic."
    "The West and its fascist Christian states would completely control the world."

    Everything is upside down!
    1. Alexander 67
      Alexander 67 3 January 2016 20: 39 New
      22
      Here we can disagree with you. The so-called West, a descendant of the Roman Empire. Rome, as an empire, broadcast its orderly system of government to the earth, and from that they have everything smooth and manageable. Russia is not anarchic. She, as someone says, "lives by concepts." Our people more often rely on their inner intuition than on the written norms of laws. The fact that the majority is atheistic is highly controversial. People can, without visiting the Temple, live according to the commandments of Christ and according to their own conscience. And the majority live this way. After all, as the Biblical plot says: "The first" guest "of Paradise was a robber, and the first one who got to Hell was the apostle.
      1. nadezhiva
        nadezhiva 3 January 2016 23: 00 New
        41
        This laudatory article is written by a typical modern European ((

        What was it for?
        The funny thing is that "typical Europeans" are quite strange these days. For example, with these slogans
      2. Mentat
        Mentat 6 January 2016 04: 31 New
        0
        Quote: Alexander 67
        After all, as the Bible story states: The first guest of Paradise was a robber. And the first to go to Hell was the apostle.
        There are no plots in the Bible that the apostle went to Hell. Very strange statement and strange error. Apparently, you do not understand the difference between the student and the apostle.
      3. anykin
        anykin 11 January 2016 17: 53 New
        -1
        1. Our history and Orthodoxy are inseparable. This is in our blood (for now). Apparently Europeans believe that if we do not burn witches at the stake, then we are atheists. They have a religion for showdowns and wars, and we have for life in the world.

        2. The state cannot be both fascist and Christian. As Kozma Prutkov said: "If you read the inscription" buffalo "on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes.")
    2. de_monSher
      de_monSher 4 January 2016 09: 12 New
      14

      "It's not about religion: Russia is mostly anarchist and atheistic."
      "The West and its fascist Christian states would completely control the world."
      Everything is upside down!


      Why, upside down? It seems to be a completely adequate assessment - most of the population of Russia = like the former USSR, by the way = "thank God", spits on religious "values" from the high bell tower = I put these words in quotes, not to belittle their value, but what move them away from the usual attitude of a person of the former USSR =.

      The invasion of clericalism in people's daily lives is the most stupid thing you can think of. A lamp in a corner of the house, with icons, for the average Christian, or a Friday prayer for the average Muslim of the former USSR, is not at all the same as religious thinking for the average Christian, or a Muslim resident of the rest of the world. The West is tired of such thinking, chooses complete godlessness, and the Middle East is tired of the West, chooses terrorism - that’s the whole result of clericalism.

      In this regard, whatever one may say, the USSR left us all a legacy of an excellent worldview and attitude = especially in this respect, the non-Slavic peoples were lucky = - multilingualism from birth, the possibility of obtaining the broadest outlook, since from birth a person is "cooked" in a "pot peoples ", with" not dissolved ingredients "also from birth = the latter already depends on the person himself =.

      Moreover, Western civilization is a civilization of "letters and dots of the law" - if robbery is legal, then it cannot be condemned by anyone. Ours, we can already say civilization = and the USSR, after all, there was a civilization with its own imperatives of development =, does not strongly accept the law if it runs counter to human values.

      Of course there are things that have been alarming lately - the former USSR is now trying to follow in the footsteps of the West and the East (Christian and Muslim parts, respectively). In the "Christian" parts of the former USSR, it seems to me that the people themselves are opposed. In the "Muslim" countries, for the most part, the state, and then the people themselves. As an example - Russia and Uzbekistan. In Russia, the main opponents of clericalism are people who care, but in Uzbekistan, the state "hated and tired of all" is like a battering ram against any attempts to create a fortress of clericalism on its territory. I don't know what will come of it - but I would like us all to win this confrontation.

      Remember, at one time the USSR was called the Upper Volta with missiles? This definition has its advantages. We have never been infected with those diseases that now, in the West and in the East of the "developed" world, have turned into cancerous tumors with metastases. This gives hope that a consciousness that is not blindfolded by all sorts of nonsense will be able to give out a new imperative of development, which will finally lead all of us out of the global deadlock of development. And here it's not about technology, and other benefits of civilization = technology, in fact, does not correlate with the development of people, they just serve, everyone and everything - for example, the same chapter of "Boko Haram", driving around in Africa in a Mercedes and using all over with satellite phones, insolently denied the existence of not only the universe or the solar system, but even the near space, that is, the possibility of even launching satellites =

      Mdya ... that the brain after the new year does not function well, thoughts run up ... *) Happy New Year to all of you, Friends. I wish you all the best, the realization of all the dreams and desires this year. Look ... *)
      1. unsinkable
        unsinkable 4 January 2016 12: 47 New
        -1
        Quote: de_monSher
        making all dreams come true

        Sorry, dear, but in this comment only the last paragraph is yours. A person who wrote such a * abstruse * comment cannot admit such a blunder: * All DREAMS *. Correctly, all DREAMS. If you distort it for fun, take it in quotation marks. (Refute conclusively sorry) hi
        1. de_monSher
          de_monSher 4 January 2016 14: 13 New
          10
          * All DREAMS *. That's right, all DREAMS.


          Thanks for the amendment, but still, keep two things in mind:

          1. It is permissible to distort words a little, in "live" communication = which includes communication on the forums = - after all, no one has canceled direct speech yet. And she, always shows the human soul, to the bottom ... *))

          2. Well, I'm sorry, not Russian ... *)) Although he is my native. And I love and respect him, and even write on it, works that are quite extensive - but still, that is, that is ... *)))

          Well, on the occasion of you, separately. I hope this year you will not be too academic ... *)))
      2. a housewife
        a housewife 4 January 2016 16: 53 New
        0
        And what to put - minus for "intelligible words" or plus for interesting reasoning? Probably, after all, a minus - for the fact that interesting arguments are still controversial.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. anykin
        anykin 11 January 2016 17: 54 New
        0
        1. Our history and Orthodoxy are inseparable. This is in our blood (for now). Apparently Europeans believe that if we do not burn witches at the stake, then we are atheists. They have a religion for showdowns and wars, and we have for life in the world.

        2. The state cannot be both fascist and Christian. As Kozma Prutkov said: "If you read the inscription" buffalo "on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes.")
      5. anykin
        anykin 11 January 2016 17: 54 New
        -1
        1. Our history and Orthodoxy are inseparable. This is in our blood (for now). Apparently Europeans believe that if we do not burn witches at the stake, then we are atheists. They have a religion for showdowns and wars, and we have for life in the world.

        2. The state cannot be both fascist and Christian. As Kozma Prutkov said: "If you read the inscription" buffalo "on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes.")
    3. dzeredzavkomimu
      dzeredzavkomimu 5 January 2016 03: 55 New
      +1
      ahh, that is, in your opinion, the West has prevented Russia from controlling the whole world?
    4. anykin
      anykin 11 January 2016 12: 14 New
      0
      1. Our history and Orthodoxy are inseparable. This is in our blood (for now). Apparently Europeans believe that if we do not burn witches at the stake, then we are atheists. They have a religion for showdowns and wars, and we have for life in the world.

      2. The state cannot be both fascist and Christian. As Kozma Prutkov said: "If you read the inscription" buffalo "on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes.")
  • djqnbdjqnb
    djqnbdjqnb 3 January 2016 20: 44 New
    16
    Quote: Proxima
    It seems to me that the main reason for the aggression of the West towards Russia is that we are not like them. They cannot count us, therefore we are unpredictable for them, and therefore dangerous. So it was, and unfortunately, it will be so.


    I agree, but I will supplement it. They feel that we are morally stronger, taller than them, and cannot bear it. Hence the constant throwing of information mud at us, no matter what the political system is in Russia now. So it was under the tsar-priest, during the Soviet era, the same continues now. With a little break for Yeltsin
    1. Starley from the south
      Starley from the south 3 January 2016 21: 44 New
      16
      Quote: djqnbdjqnb
      They feel that we are morally stronger, taller than them, and cannot bear it.

      And then I will supplement. In all wars, they showed themselves from the worst side, even if they fought with us on the same side. We showed ourselves from the best side. They cannot forgive us for the fact that they always turn out to be defeated; in them, on a subconscious level, lives the desire to get rid of constant humiliation, of which we and World History are evidence. Their base souls are not able to find a way out, therefore they strive, if not to destroy us, they cannot afford it, then at least to slander, and also to rewrite History, having deleted from there the traces of their shame and insignificance!
  • Gorynovich
    Gorynovich 3 January 2016 20: 54 New
    21
    Unfortunately, it really was, it is, and it will be so.
    And the mental reason for the hatred of the West really is our negligence.
    Only now, even if we were thoroughly predictable, soft, white and fluffy for them, one hell would have tried to devour us. The reason is commonplace - huge natural wealth and geostrategic position.
  • Oleg14774
    Oleg14774 3 January 2016 21: 05 New
    -15
    Quote: Proxima
    . They can't count us

    The collapse of Russia, when it was called the USSR do you think their failure?
    1. Starik72
      Starik72 3 January 2016 21: 50 New
      11
      Oleg is not their luck, but a real loss. He showed the whole WORLD what the United States and world capitalism are.
      1. nadezhiva
        nadezhiva 3 January 2016 23: 58 New
        23
        Interview with Bush Sr. 1992 year.
        - Then I do not understand - why did you do this?

        - Then what - "Friend in need - Friend forever" (Friend in Need is - Friend indeed). You do not understand well what happened. Russia is not defeated, on the contrary - it has become very strong and we need it to be Our Friend - that is why I fed all these Russians for free. And those who defeated me only want to rob. The Russians will not forget that and will send us an invoice someday.

        - I do not understand why you are sure that Russia has increased. After all, she had just been defeated ...

        - Russia and the Union - as Matryoshka. They were nested in each other. In reality, we competed with Russia, but she was in the form of the Union, that is, she had huge Giri on her feet. Now, with the collapse of the Union, these Gears have been removed, Russia will overcome its current problems and become much more evil and powerful, and will well remember everyone who has offended it now. And I would like to be the same Friend of Russia as I was the Enemy for the Soviets.

        It is necessary to put on the best horse. Do you want to know what kind of Geary she had? This is in numbers - there were two bottomless holes in the Union, where all budget surpluses flowed - Agriculture and Social Assistance. Since today's Russia may have former incomes and not spend money on these unprofitable items of expenditure - in the coming years it will become stronger and more dangerous than the USSR.

        - I do not understand - why Russia will be able to cut its spending on social assistance and agriculture?

        - It's all in numbers. The main consumers of agricultural subsidies in the Union were in Ukraine. Ukraine leaves - the Russians are closing the "black hole" in the budget for subsidies for the village. The main consumers of social assistance were in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Since there is no Union, Russia, the main earner for the Union budget, stops subsidizing its Muslim republics with many children. And then - arithmetic - Ukraine, Central Asia and the Transcaucasus find themselves with budget deficits and plunge into the abyss of despair, Russia finds itself with budget surpluses and its treasury turns out to be larger and more powerful than the Soviet one. And then she will return with triumph and remember everything to us, and our economy is already in a borderline state - zero profit. My rival Clinton promises to "stimulate the economy", which means that we will go into debt, and our economy is in a state where we can no longer afford borrowing. This means that our budget will be negative and over time we, as a country, will become naked and barefoot, and the Russians will be rich and powerful.

        And for the sake of Friendship with the strong and powerful - my free legs in a moment when they have nothing to eat - will bring huge dividends. And they would bring even greater ones if I could keep the flock of our eternally hungry hyenas and jackals from robbery ... Ah, if you could keep the Union from collapsing, if it got used to our good hand and eventually became tame, like a pet dog ...

        But nothing can be done. All these jackals themselves decide their fate - I know the Russians, they will not forgive anything, they will not forget anything ....
        1. Proxima
          Proxima 4 January 2016 00: 36 New
          17
          Quote: nadezhiva
          Interview with Bush Sr. 1992 year.
          - Then I do not understand - why did you do this?

          - Then what - "Friend in need - Friend forever" (Friend in Need is - Friend indeed). You do not understand well what happened. Russia is not defeated, on the contrary - it has become very strong and we need it to be Our Friend - that is why I fed all these Russians for free. And those who defeated me only want to rob. The Russians will not forget that and will send us an invoice someday.

          - I do not understand why you are sure that Russia has increased. After all, she had just been defeated ...

          - Russia and the Union - as Matryoshka. They were nested in each other. In reality, we competed with Russia, but it was in the form of the Union, that is, it had huge kettlebells on its feet. [/ U]

          This is the whole paradox. The USSR fed half of the world. The RSFSR, as a true "bloodthirsty" metropolis, constantly dated its 14 "colonies". But nobody, I stress NO ONE, appreciated this. Everyone thought that Russia, in some incomprehensible way for their minds (they probably judged by themselves), still managed to rob them. And everyone perceived our help as our weakness. Hence the burst of separatism, both in the republics and in the RSFSR. Let me remind you that Russia was also the initiator of the collapse of the Union. But the Americans quickly calculated this whole situation for the simple reason that everything is different for them. If you want to rob the state, it couldn't be easier, bribe the "elite", zombie the population, and then take at least three skins from this population.
        2. Hardy
          Hardy 4 January 2016 03: 14 New
          -2
          Quote: nadezhiva
          Interview with Bush Sr. 1992 year.

          Everything is correct, only they made sure that we had nothing left and that we did not rise.
          How much do they officially export from us annually? 150 billion bucks? And not officially, how much do we owe them and to whom does everything in Russia belong? In which countries are the homes of our owners and where do their children study? Where do corrupt officials take stolen goods?
          They heard Bush and drew conclusions. Why are you happy here? To the fact that they succeeded?))) The Gorbachev-Yeltsin case lives and thrives, unlike the country. And what kind of museum did they beat !!!!! Be proud of the country with its first president)))))))))
          Maybe new weapons and little green men rejoice? So the West is preparing us for the war, so that once again it will take its foe away from it with the wrong hands. Only now will we kill ourselves. They don’t need us so much for the export of resources. Or maybe you cheated guys from the former social. republics as enemies?
        3. Old Schweik
          Old Schweik 4 January 2016 16: 30 New
          0
          It turns out that this funny old man was not at all!
          1. Old Schweik
            Old Schweik 4 January 2016 20: 38 New
            0
            I got a strange comment with the censorship fades.))) wassat
    2. nemets
      nemets 4 January 2016 09: 35 New
      +2
      it’s not so simple, maybe this is our move. To succumb, to rub in confidence (Georgia and Ukraine) and begin to ruin them. The collapse of the EU is not far off, the collapse of the Americans is possible. Everything will show a new year)
      1. Hardy
        Hardy 4 January 2016 12: 50 New
        -2
        Quote: nemets
        it’s not so simple, maybe this is our move. To succumb, to rub in confidence (Georgia and Ukraine) and begin to ruin them. The collapse of the EU is not far off, the collapse of the Americans is possible. Everything will show a new year)

        Everything is just very simple))) Transnational corporations weaken the state around the world. And Europe and the United States are just like we are being crushed. The United States is smaller, because there they still have a lot of offices))) And they are not even doing it from evil, they have the task of weakening state control over themselves. What they successfully achieve. See who is most crushed by the same sanctions, medium and small national business, that is, the support of states. At the same time, Russia quietly sells rocket engines))) And the funny thing is not even that they did not impose sanctions, but that we sell them ... that means, there are agreements on the top))))) And the agreements are already not war to victory, this is business))))
    3. djqnbdjqnb
      djqnbdjqnb 5 January 2016 03: 37 New
      0
      Quote: Oleg147741
      The collapse of Russia, when it was called the USSR do you think their failure?


      A common mistake is to assume that the collapse of the USSR is the work of Western intelligence agencies. If they had won the Cold War, they would have divided Russia. This is the result of internal problems, our party has degenerated, and it has failed to cope with the leadership of the country. And the West was immediately laden with orders, it was he who won the Cold War, it was he who destroyed the USSR.
  • Starley from the south
    Starley from the south 3 January 2016 21: 32 New
    13
    Quote: Proxima
    we are not like them

    We can say more precisely: we belong to different civilizations. They are the worst kind of material civilization, where there is nothing sacred, but there is only money. We are involuntarily striving for perfection, a spiritual civilization. Our values ​​are completely different, we should never live in peace, one of us must die. But our cause is just, the victory will be ours!
    1. katerina
      katerina 4 January 2016 00: 17 New
      -16
      ??? this is pearl !! Russia is a spiritual civilization ?? do not make me laugh! rather, it’s nothing sacred in Russia but it’s just money that rules everything, people don’t count people for people, just heaps and corruption everywhere is sad. will you argue?
      1. Starley from the south
        Starley from the south 4 January 2016 01: 37 New
        +8
        Quote: katerina
        will you argue?

        I will. Fortunately, in our country, Western civilization has not gone as far as you think. And the question is backfill, and why do we have then ... a conflict with the West? Or do you want to say that it is Putin’s personal ambitions? So it's even funnier! laughing laughing laughing
    2. Proxima
      Proxima 4 January 2016 08: 30 New
      +8
      Quote: Starley from the South
      Quote: Proxima
      we are not like them

      We can say more precisely: we belong to different civilizations. They are the worst kind of material civilization, where there is nothing sacred, but there is only money. We are involuntarily striving for perfection, a spiritual civilization. Our values ​​are completely different, we should never live in peace, one of us must die. But our cause is just, the victory will be ours!

      You can even put it simpler. We have an order of magnitude more healthy worldview, morality. A case in point: a bearded woman wins at Eurovision, a bearded monk, Father Photius, won in our Voice. What is noteworthy, both here and there the audience chose.
  • rom8726
    rom8726 4 January 2016 08: 24 New
    -3
    It seems to me that the main and only cause of Western aggression against Russia is natural resources. Europe has few or no of them, so they always went to the East for these resources, something needs to be fed to the children. And we have everything, so we always had a defensive position (with the exception of the wars for access to the seas). If Russia were a small or medium-sized European country without oil, metals, timber and other things, then we would be just as aggressive towards those who have enough resources, among Europeans we would be ours and together we would go to war against all eastern neighbors.
    Always for this reason they fought with them, so we are bad for them simply by inertia. And I do not agree with the opinion that we are all so holy, and they are the fiends of hell. We must fight for life. They fight - well done, we defend - fine. There are no bad and good.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 4 January 2016 11: 18 New
      +3
      "There are no good and bad."
      Sorry, if you hit someone's face, that's okay, but if you are, then "why?"
      The difference is that we don’t go to them, and they easily. And the thing is, yes, in the resources, of which we have a lot. Are we bad as a result of this? No, they are the fiends of hell!
      You know, in court, how they reason. The girl, as it were, did not behave provocatively, but if she said "no", then be kind, serve your five years, if you don't understand. Anything can happen there.
  • Maj.
    Maj. 4 January 2016 09: 45 New
    0
    Dear Proxima, which means, unfortunately, do you want us to be enslaved?
    1. Proxima
      Proxima 4 January 2016 10: 14 New
      +3
      Quote: major
      Dear Proxima, which means, unfortunately, do you want us to be enslaved?

      "Unfortunately" - this means that I do not want to see the constant aggression of other states towards my country. It is economically very costly to confront the whole world.
  • Skif83
    Skif83 4 January 2016 10: 20 New
    12
    The main reason for their aggression is the largest and richest country in the world! And her people are Russians, for some reason they don't want to share with the "poor" Europa!
    But it came to us thanks to our ancestors, who did not sit on the stove, contrary to fairy tales, but conquered and developed new lands.
    If you argue this way, then whoever tried as hard as he got by his efforts. So Europe went to the Crusades to Asia and what ...? Well, they robbed as much as they could, but conquered something with a gulkin nose ...
    And we are dangerous because we fight as we live, without compromise, if we love, then we truly love, if we walk, then we walk from the heart, if we fight, so that there is no stone unturned.
    And it is IMPOSSIBLE to control us!
    For the most part, I hope.
    We can, out of laziness, tolerate all sorts of crooks, mediocrities and scoundrels who have seized power, but this is up to the moment when we begin to understand that there is nothing to lose and “it’s no longer possible.”
    And there is also a "strange" quality, we (at least the majority) do not count tugriks in the pockets of our partner-neighbors, and we don’t like their democracy, give us our own, what we like, but it is just consonant with world justice, morality ..., but such a people will not obey any "new" world feudal lord.
    Something like this ...
    1. Proxima
      Proxima 4 January 2016 17: 27 New
      +1
      Quote: Skif83
      The main reason for their aggression is the largest and richest country in the world!

      And we also had Alaska, Oregon, Northern California ... It's a pity that it was all wasted, we had to give it up. We were then weak after the Crimean War. True, after 15 years we again strengthened economically and militarily and began to further "develop" the territories - Manchuria, southern Turkestan, northern Iran, but the American continent was irretrievably lost to us.
  • parafoiler
    parafoiler 4 January 2016 10: 38 New
    +1
    I apologize! Wrong clicked. HUGE PLUS for you !!!
  • solkhat
    solkhat 4 January 2016 12: 47 New
    +5
    We are sincere. We take a bottle (vodka, wine, moonshine) and go to cry to a friend. There is a conversation about life, politics. About everything. Truth is born. We don’t take parents to nursing homes en masse. There is no euthanasia, especially euthanasia revolts me children. That is, in the West there is a rule: it is necessary to destroy what prevents you from living without worries. A consumer society has been growing for many years. And we have a soul. Hence the sincere actions, caring for the weak and helpless, helping the sick. That's the fundamental difference.
  • dmi.pris
    dmi.pris 3 January 2016 20: 04 New
    +7
    It's just masochism, history doesn’t teach them anything. They try all the problems of Russia on themselves, and they think, right now the Russians will bend .. But no .. That's what infuriates them.
    1. the villain
      the villain 3 January 2016 22: 51 New
      +3
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Try on all the problems of Russia on themselves, and think, right now, the Russians will bend.

      I remembered Sergei Trofimov: "Now, if these Yankees with their jacuzzi and bidet were to our government, to communal apartments, and to our own traffic police" I would love to look at this yes
  • zulus222
    zulus222 3 January 2016 20: 31 New
    13
    we always win. just pay for it is very expensive!
  • Sid.74
    3 January 2016 23: 56 New
    11
    Quote: Esso
    But after all, they are naturally taken away from us ...

    ... Yes ... well, because they climb the same ... request

  • MIKHALYCH1
    MIKHALYCH1 3 January 2016 19: 10 New
    51
    Eshkin the cat only knows .... And the old woman! hi
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 3 January 2016 19: 55 New
      20
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      Eshkin the cat only knows .... And the old woman! hi [media = https: //www.youtub.com/watch? feature = player_detailpage & v = 2AhPONOePg]

      All European civilization is trying in every possible way to make us savages and raise our level. This is perhaps one of the fundamental mistakes of the West! We in their view are still drinking bread with cabbage soup with bears!
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 3 January 2016 20: 16 New
        21
        Quote: APASUS
        We in their view are still drinking bread with cabbage soup with bears!

        Oh, they forgot about the bears, they are walking along the street with balalaikas. laughing
        1. Bayonet
          Bayonet 3 January 2016 21: 03 New
          13
          Quote: vlad66
          Oh, they forgot about the bears, they are walking along the street with balalaikas.

          smile
        2. Bayonet
          Bayonet 3 January 2016 21: 07 New
          +3
          Quote: vlad66
          Oh, they forgot about the bears, they are walking along the street with balalaikas.

          And ride! wink
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 3 January 2016 21: 19 New
            17
            Quote: Bayonet
            And ride!

            Quote: Bayonet
            Quote: vlad66
            Oh, they forgot about the bears, they are walking along the street with balalaikas.

            smile

            Quote: vlad66
            Oh, they forgot about the bears, they are walking along the street with balalaikas.

            Yes, we don’t pay much attention to them good
      2. Rock616
        Rock616 3 January 2016 22: 41 New
        16
        Or so)))) wassat
    2. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 5 January 2016 19: 14 New
      +1
      It's like that. But while reading the article I hear that song all the time. Do you understand me? We are Russian. We are not superheroes. We do not have a superweapon that will defeat everything for us. We are not immortal, we are vulnerable, we are not so heroes now. Really have to ?! Yes, we will win, otherwise it is impossible. We will win, of course. But...

      The enemies burned their native hut
      Ruined his whole family
      Where can the soldier go now?
      Who should bear their sorrow?
      Soldier went in wide field
      At the crossroads of two roads
      Found a soldier in a wide field
      Grass overgrown tubercle ...

      Is the soldier again scorched by all the lights of the world roaring in the ashes without tears? Yes, how much can you! Will the Russian land withstand another blow, another victory? No matter how the soldiers died on that tubercle, on the old placer, the heart, although it became stronger, was still not eternal. And then what?
  • Proxima
    Proxima 3 January 2016 19: 12 New
    26
    Yes, it turns out that in France there are literate people. The style resembles Prokhanov. I read it with great pleasure. Many thanks to the author!
    1. Corporal Valera
      Corporal Valera 3 January 2016 19: 37 New
      20
      I was also very surprised to read a kind of ode to Russians from a Western journalist. One can only hope that they are printed elsewhere, except for Russian publications.
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 3 January 2016 19: 50 New
      13
      Quote: Proxima
      Yes, it turns out that in France there are literate people.

      Well, as if the name of the author - Andre Vlchek hints that he is not quite French. Slav - Czech, Pole, Slovenian? But this was especially pleasant: "if you go to a barber and say that you are Russian, people will stand up, hug you and cry." Strong. Really strong, if so ..
      It is a pity that the author did not indicate what would happen if, suddenly, you introduce yourself as an American, I think that nothing good is expected in this case bully
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 3 January 2016 20: 08 New
        +3
        Well, it depends on where .. In Poland, for example, they’ll lick the whole ass .. In France they can spit in your pocket (if you’re a fart)
      2. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 3 January 2016 20: 19 New
        11
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Well, as if the name of the author - Andre Vlcek hints that he is not quite French. Slav - Czech, Pole, Slovenian?


        An American philosopher, writer, film director, journalist, poet, playwright and photographer, Andre Vltchek is a revolutionary, internationalist and traveler who fights against Western imperialism and the Western regime imposed on the world.

        The translation from English, a colleague, is therefore somewhat clumsy. In general, he has a very interesting blog, with a translator. hi
    3. Monos
      Monos 3 January 2016 20: 31 New
      +7
      He is not French. Rather, an American Czech with Russian roots. Born, by the way, in St. Petersburg.
    4. vetrov
      vetrov 4 January 2016 22: 25 New
      0
      I agree with you. Honestly, I did not expect such a text from a foreigner. Just an amazing understanding of our mission on the planet. It was also surprising that this article was generally published in the West.
  • vovanpain
    vovanpain 3 January 2016 19: 15 New
    49
    Thanks to the author, a good article. Russia saw many enemies and not many enemies came back, think a sheep, think Obama.
    1. Weyland
      Weyland 4 January 2016 01: 52 New
      +2
      The funny thing is that all three are representatives of the same racial type (carriers purely african haplogroups E1b1)! laughing
      1. Kunar
        Kunar 4 January 2016 19: 38 New
        +1
        If it is true..... laughing
  • Imperialkolorad
    Imperialkolorad 3 January 2016 19: 28 New
    +6
    Quote: Eugene-Eugene
    Because they once in 100 years are going to grab shchi.

    Yes, they have such a tradition. The last time the EU came under the leadership of Adik.
  • vlad66
    vlad66 3 January 2016 19: 29 New
    23
    If it were not for Russia, the planet Earth would no longer exist. At least, in the form in which we are accustomed to see it. The West and its fascist Christian states would completely control the world. And the “nedonaroda” would be treated like animals (even worse than now): there would be no boundaries, limits to theft and destruction.

    Everything is rightly said that we are observing this hour in the Middle East and Ukraine and other countries enslaved by the West.
  • Wolverine
    Wolverine 3 January 2016 19: 41 New
    11
    Everything in the world is cyclical, the ebb-tide, the emission-remission, people get tired of a good life, too, Europe is tired of life and tired, as it is, is looking for adventure on its ass.
  • kodxnumx
    kodxnumx 3 January 2016 19: 42 New
    +7
    Quote: Eugene-Eugene
    Because they once in 100 years are going to grab shchi.

    These are the words that liberals, traitors of Russia, should remember all kinds of colors! This is not said to be a citizen of Russia, a citizen of enlightened Europe, but they understand and see the capital truths, but you’ll settle down all you couldn’t ruin Mother Russia, in the West people pray that we are it means that something has not been lost! A lot of the clever and useful by the Author Andre Wlczek for our homegrown traitors.
    1. Oprychnik
      Oprychnik 3 January 2016 20: 12 New
      42
      I went to the author's site. There, in this article there is such a picture.
      1. Andrei946
        Andrei946 3 January 2016 21: 02 New
        +2
        Quote: Oprychnik
        I went to the author's site. There, in this article there is such a picture.
        Well, this is already too much ....
        1. Dembel77
          Dembel77 3 January 2016 21: 57 New
          +6
          If it weren’t for Russia, there would be no more planet Earth
          I will add: "If not for the Soviet Union." And there is nothing more to add to the article, almost everything to the point.
        2. Dryuya2
          Dryuya2 4 January 2016 01: 55 New
          +8
          Quote: Andrei946
          Well, this is already too much ....

          This is a photo from Syria - why bust?
        3. Victor-M
          Victor-M 4 January 2016 02: 25 New
          12
          Quote: Andrei946
          Quote: Oprychnik
          I went to the author's site. There, in this article there is such a picture.
          Well, this is already too much ....

          This is for you, and these people who see death every day do not think so.
        4. seregina68
          seregina68 5 January 2016 07: 46 New
          0
          And I think that this is just gratitude.
      2. Simon
        Simon 3 January 2016 21: 41 New
        +7
        Interestingly, did anyone in the world kiss Obama like that?
        1. vlad66
          vlad66 4 January 2016 00: 51 New
          14
          Quote: Simon
          Interestingly, did anyone in the world kiss Obama like that?

          Well, there for example dill, sprats, pscheki, and even then in the ass.
  • shooter18
    shooter18 3 January 2016 22: 22 New
    +9
    What a generous article about my homeland! thanks to the author! We are Russians what a delight !!
  • 11 black
    11 black 4 January 2016 12: 08 New
    0
    Quote: Eugene-Eugene
    If it weren’t for Russia, there would be no more planet Earth. At least in the form in which we are accustomed to see it. West and its fascist Christian states

    I don’t understand this - Christians have something to do with, you know, before the attack, before rushing at the enemy, at the cannons and machine guns, I don’t believe that at least one of the soldiers didn’t have a "Well with God" in his head, so the Christian religion (not the one that traded in indulgences, but the Orthodox) should not interfere with fascism - this is disgusting, although maybe I misunderstood you ...
    1. a housewife
      a housewife 4 January 2016 17: 15 New
      0
      Just the word "Christian" should be in quotation marks!
  • SAXA.SHURA
    SAXA.SHURA 4 January 2016 12: 57 New
    0
    Not a bad article, but only I didn’t quite understand why they should forgive us, we should behave in such a way that no one would get the idea to forgive us or forgive us from under the gates, but nothing more, but tear off the head.
  • GSH-18
    GSH-18 3 January 2016 19: 10 New
    29
    Russia has always been an "obstacle." This colossal country interfered with the cruel plans of Washington, Berlin, London and Paris. Plans on how to take control and plunder the whole world.

    Exactly. Do not subtract, do not add.
  • Igor39
    Igor39 3 January 2016 19: 12 New
    +8
    Well done Andre! I wrote everything correctly.
    1. larand
      larand 3 January 2016 19: 41 New
      15
      Quote: Igor39
      Well done Andre! I wrote everything correctly.


      It is bad that with us, except maybe Prokhanov, no one dares to say so. But Putin or Lavrov would have given such a thing from the UN rostrum.
  • velikoros-xnumx
    velikoros-xnumx 3 January 2016 19: 12 New
    15
    Neither add nor decrease. Only the presence of such people helps to stay one step away from insurmountable hatred and hostility towards the West.
  • RESEARCHER
    RESEARCHER 3 January 2016 19: 15 New
    +3
    If we do not merge with the West in the general ecstasy of consumption for consumption, then everything will be fine. And if Western appetites prevail in us, then the grandmother said in two,
  • venaya
    venaya 3 January 2016 19: 16 New
    +4
    in most cases, Russia has almost no choice. The alternative to victory was only the end of humanity ...
    In the West there is nothing sacred. And it can’t be in principle.

    This article raises important issues that, in my opinion, are not sufficiently covered. Russia has no other choice because Russia does not set the tone for global processes, but is forced to respond to them, now gradually it is no longer productive enough, we are gradually forced to change.
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 3 January 2016 19: 20 New
      +6
      Russia lives its own life, and it desires from others
    2. Azitral
      Azitral 3 January 2016 21: 38 New
      +5
      You are right.
      1) According to the article - I have not thought about conquering the country in such an aspect for a long time: and yet, even if we distract from kvass patriotism, into which it is so easy to fall into, there is something in it. Without us, the collapse of colonialism would not have come. But it ended, perhaps, with the rise of China.
      2) The ability to fight in Russian is still a defense. Cinema, which is watched by the whole world, animation, which is watched by the whole world, medicine, for which they call into the country, education, which gives invincible people, unbearably beautiful cities, is an offensive.
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 3 January 2016 22: 17 New
        +1
        There would be no rise in China, and India would not be independent either.
        1. Azitral
          Azitral 4 January 2016 02: 54 New
          +1
          I’m talking about this. We brought down. And the rise of China is a sign that Western colonialism is over. A non-Western super-giant sprang up. Whatever one may say, we are white, we live in Europe, Hoistians. With all reservations.
          An analogy came to mind: hecatonheirs. When the full atatuy came, the gods pulled them out of Tartarus to restore order. And then somehow without much effort they sent back.
    3. sarmaght
      sarmaght 4 January 2016 23: 22 New
      0
      “World processes” today consist in sharing resources with the “golden billion” - do you enter it? are they waiting for you there? VV-speaks in a language they understand, “calibers” that make the US 6th fleet a senseless pile of metal, and will not allow UNDERSTANDING PURCHASE anywhere! "Bastions" who launched "d.kuk" and for a long time discouraged the Yanks from hunting here, and other "nishtyaks" for respected "partners"!
  • doc62
    doc62 3 January 2016 19: 17 New
    +9
    perhaps it’s more accurate not to say ... every word is like a nail in the coffin of the west
  • YGV-97219
    YGV-97219 3 January 2016 19: 19 New
    +6
    Such judgments are rare in the "west" but as we can see they are still present and this is encouraging!
  • ordin64
    ordin64 3 January 2016 19: 20 New
    +6
    The more representatives of this or that nation speak about its purity - be it Poles, Ukrainians, Turks ... - the meaner the nation. The exception is the USA. A smelter of nations, but meaner politicians to look for.
  • avva2012
    avva2012 3 January 2016 19: 22 New
    +5
    Colonialism, as the author describes it, simply has outlived itself. At present, the West needs markets for its products, that is, not by will they have to maintain a certain standard of living in the former colonies. Resources are now being robbed more civilized. So, we can say that colonialism did not disappear anywhere, but simply transformed. Unfortunately, the role of Russia is currently not understood. There is no ideology, and therefore, there is no direction where we are striving. Just saying that we are not like that is not enough. You need to really say who WE are.
    1. MREDBEST
      MREDBEST 3 January 2016 20: 31 New
      +5
      Quote: avva2012
      So, we can say that colonialism did not disappear anywhere, but simply transformed.

      I would say "transatlantic", because transatlantic corporations have launched their claw to our country, and we need to do something about this, like slowly develop their production and gradually state. structures to oust foreign freeloaders!
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 3 January 2016 21: 08 New
        +2
        I would say that once the Bolsheviks did this, let someone not like it. In RI, the share of foreign capital was not small. And now, apparently, internal privatizers did not give much opportunity to get into the economy. Or not?
        1. MREDBEST
          MREDBEST 3 January 2016 21: 19 New
          +1
          Quote: avva2012
          And now, apparently, internal privatizers did not give much opportunity to get into the economy. Or not?

          Why they didn’t give, they gave, here we reap the fruits, drink Coke, eat big poppy, my head with headscolders))))
          Well, I personally try to switch to Russian goods in almost everything!
          1. avva2012
            avva2012 3 January 2016 22: 15 New
            +3
            No, I'm not talking about Coca-Cola. It is known that in RI, oil fields, almost 80% were in the hands of foreigners. Lena mines in my opinion, railway, built on French loans. Yes, a lot of things. The USSR, they did not want to admit, was also for the fact that all these enterprises were nationalized. So, in a big way, in Russia, isn’t that now?
  • soroKING
    soroKING 3 January 2016 19: 23 New
    +4
    Quote: yugv-xnumx
    Such judgments are rare in the "west" but as we can see they are still present and this is encouraging!

    judging by the surname Slav hi
  • Luga
    Luga 3 January 2016 19: 26 New
    +6
    I have not encountered this author before, but in vain. Article plus, of course. The only thing that bothered in some way was too much pathos. I see the role of Russia as an eternal counterweight to the West in the struggle to preserve the spiritual component of humanity exactly as the author described.

    Went to read his other publications.
  • IrOqUoIs
    IrOqUoIs 3 January 2016 19: 32 New
    +3
    Quote: soroKING
    Quote: yugv-xnumx
    Such judgments are rare in the "west" but as we can see they are still present and this is encouraging!

    judging by the surname Slav hi

    Yeah ... For the rhetoric of recent times, it sounds very frank ... However, this is a voice into the void, but no one will hear us.
  • Alex 74
    Alex 74 3 January 2016 19: 34 New
    +5
    The correct article!
  • Bosk
    Bosk 3 January 2016 19: 37 New
    +5
    This is a very emotional article, but I agree on one thing all one hundred percent, if it weren't for Russia, the world would look differently ... much differently and it would be much worse “differently”! But if it weren't for America ... hmm it brought ...
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 3 January 2016 19: 38 New
    +5
    The author is emotional, the writer, apparently. But as I understand it! Unfortunately, in politics one does not have to deal with those who like, but with those who are. And what about the destruction of colonial policy recalled. But we forgot about it. In reality, there should be no hegemon in the world. Development stops ...
  • ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 3 January 2016 19: 40 New
    +6
    People get tired of sleeping, loving, singing and dancing faster than fighting (Homer).
    How many of them still have to disappear on our open spaces, so that everyone once and for all understands that it is easier to cross the ocean than to crush Russia? request
  • YohanPalych
    YohanPalych 3 January 2016 19: 45 New
    16

    Russia is not just “waging wars”. Her struggle for the survival of mankind is nothing but a work of art, poetry, a symphony. It is difficult to explain, but it is so ... And it does it with all its power and with all its heart.

    Author-Foreigner. But He grasped the SPIRIT of the Russian People-Our essence with you! For this Honor and Praise !!! hi
  • kiparis
    kiparis 3 January 2016 19: 48 New
    +6
    How many people have read this article over the hill? And I wonder how many of those who read it accepted?
  • Stinger
    Stinger 3 January 2016 19: 52 New
    +7
    Good article. Very emotional, but essentially correct.
  • sds87
    sds87 3 January 2016 19: 53 New
    13
    The author, apparently, is a Slav. Andre Vlchek is associated with the Russian Andrei Volkov. The article is certainly correct. It’s a pity, only, that this is a separate opinion, about which there will be few in the world. Unfortunately, Western propaganda goes ahead of all their rotten policies and destroys all sprouts of common sense. Capitalism is alive as long as there are goods and buyers. And he will be alive, as long as there are places on Earth where you can capture and sell something in another place. Therefore, wars are the main tool for expanding capital. Capitalism loves war. Giant money is made on them. And they are the main tool for the survival of capitalism as a system. There will be no wars - there will be no capitalism. And therefore, you can write a million articles, but as long as the world lives with a capitalist system, wars will continue. And the farther, the more massive and bloody they become. And white is declared black, and black is white. All in the name of increasing capital ...
  • Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 3 January 2016 19: 57 New
    10
    I just didn’t understand why the West should forgive Russia? For the fact that we are against homosexuals, against their reptiles in front of the states? Yes, I (sorry for my treasury) put my aggregate in this west.
  • freejack
    freejack 3 January 2016 20: 00 New
    10
    If it weren’t for Russia, there would be no more planet Earth

    Strongly ... Hooked ... One of the best publications about Russia, which was not written by a Russian, which I read here ... +++ love
  • evgeny1979
    evgeny1979 3 January 2016 20: 06 New
    +5
    Now, if on the contrary Russia had not forgiven the West at least once, there would be order!
  • cap
    cap 3 January 2016 20: 08 New
    44
    vlechek
    "Vlcek Andre - philosopher, writer, journalist, poet, playwright, director and photographer; author of books:" Exposing the lies of the empire, the fight against imperialism "," Point of no return "(in English)," Found "(novel in Czech) et al. Andre Vlcek is a revolutionary internationalist and traveler who has visited dozens of war zones and conflicts including in Iraq, Peru, Sri Lanka, Bosnia, Rwanda, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, DR Congo and Timor. Vlcek confronts Western imperialism and a Western regime imposed on the world. "

    I do not think that liberal Western publications of such writers are very fond of.
    It is all the more pleasant to read it on the VO website. Thank. hi
  • Elizabeth
    Elizabeth 3 January 2016 20: 10 New
    +4
    Russia was destined to fight for the whole world by fate. If you do not believe in fate, you will never understand the famous "Russian soul". The point here is not in religion: Russia is for the most part anarchic and atheistic. But she believes in fate and accepts it.

    The article is correct, in my opinion. My + to the author. If only because there is something to argue with. About the "Russian soul", for example. There is something higher - the "Russian spirit", intolerable by all the forces of evil. Therefore, I was scratched by the fact that the author considers most of Russia anarchic and atheistic. God is order, conscience, harmony, truth. And this is, was and will be the main asset in Russia. Religions come and go. And God remains with those who are not alien to truth, harmony, conscience and order, that is, observance of laws, ranging from the laws of nature, the laws of the universe to the laws of human relationships. Each person has his own personal idea of ​​God, even the one who calls himself an "atheist". A Russian person, even having accepted the Byzantine faith, did not become a "servant of God." He has always remained and will remain free. But not an anarchist or an atheist. Because he respects order, truth and harmony and always lives by the laws of conscience.
  • Federal
    Federal 3 January 2016 20: 11 New
    +6
    I liked the article very much, thanks to the author.
    Russia can not win. There are many reasons. One of them is very pragmatic: it is a nuclear superpower. The second is that it usually is fighting for a just cause. And he does it with all his might and with all your heart.
  • arsenks
    arsenks 3 January 2016 20: 13 New
    19
    Tell me the American, what is the strength! Is it in the money? So the brother says that in money. You have a lot of money, and why? I think that power is in the truth: whoever has the truth is stronger! And the truth is always on our side ... because we are decent people.
  • olegfbi
    olegfbi 3 January 2016 20: 20 New
    13
    I can subscribe to every word from this publication!
    From personal observations ... I have been to many places in different countries. So, the vast majority of people - ordinary people, are enthusiastic about the Russians and Russia! Sincerely Enthusiastic!
    And Amer \ Anglo-Saxons hate, also sincerely!
  • parusnik
    parusnik 3 January 2016 20: 24 New
    +3
    Bravo, Andre Vlcek! It’s a pity, only one thing, there are few who understand such things ...
  • yuriy55
    yuriy55 3 January 2016 20: 27 New
    +7
    Why the West will never win and never forgive Russia


    It will never win because the spirit is not enough. They have no truth, no honor, no conscience. Russia has always been, is and will be higher than false Western morality and, if it gets down to business, it will bring it to the end. yes

    Why not forgive? Yes, in fact, Russia has never knelt in entreaties and requests for forgiveness. In addition, the disgusting feeling of cowardice and his own worthlessness, guilt and the fate of defeats before the enemy, in front of whom Russia did not flinch, makes them shed dirt on those who always beat the invaders, smashed the thugs, drove out the executioners ... does not give rest to the neighbor "civilized" Europeans, does not give them the courage to stretch out a hand to Russia with an open palm ... By this they hide and will continue to hide their testimony of poverty, moral poverty ... what
    1. Olegovi4
      Olegovi4 3 January 2016 23: 43 New
      +3
      Quote: yuriy55
      They have no truth, no honor, no conscience

      what are you speaking about? for them it is a myth, a simple shaking of the air. the main thing is to snatch, not about ,,, be the opportunity to grab an extra piece of paper for yourself, and then even a flood. we, as Vladimir Semyonovich performed - "... and that's why I left the trench, so that there was no flood at all ..." (sons go into battle).
  • Mikhail Krapivin
    Mikhail Krapivin 3 January 2016 20: 30 New
    +4
    Interestingly, and who set the only negative article?
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 3 January 2016 21: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
      Interestingly, and who set the only negative article?

      Local liberal.
    2. Starik72
      Starik72 3 January 2016 22: 12 New
      +3
      Michael. The one who really pricks his eyes, he puts the minuses.
  • DPN
    DPN 3 January 2016 20: 33 New
    +3
    Russia can be defeated only by the PEOPLE; once, he did it by ruining the USSR after listening to the offended alcoholic fuck.
    1. Olegovi4
      Olegovi4 3 January 2016 23: 44 New
      0
      and before that swept the Empire.
  • polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 3 January 2016 20: 33 New
    +4
    The West will play out, the West will wait, oh wait ..... !!!
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 4 January 2016 17: 54 New
      0
      As they say, the closest land to Germany is the black soil from Belarus, because it consists of thirty percent of the Germans.
  • BABAY22
    BABAY22 3 January 2016 20: 43 New
    13
    Russia will never attack other countries

    I don’t understand why the idea that Russia never started the war first is very popular?
    Are we so weak and we have no Interests?
    Yes, over the past 500 years, you can count a couple of dozen wars that Russia launched against other states.
    So what?
    Never mind.
    What, Joseph Vissarionovich was wrong in 1940, when the border with Finland was 40 km from the city limits of Leningrad? No matter this war, in a year 1941 Leningrad would have disappeared.
    Or in 1945 it was not necessary to fulfill allied obligations and attack Japan?
    Or didn’t Peter I need to start the Northern War in 1700? It might not have been necessary, but Russia in this case would have been completely different (we were not given better or worse to know).
    PS. No need to rewrite your story, it is without us who want to rewrite a dime a dozen.
    1. pofigisst74
      pofigisst74 4 January 2016 01: 08 New
      0
      Please list TWO Dozen wars that Russia began. With dates and details! If you do not dial two dozen, then you are a troll!
      1. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 4 January 2016 02: 04 New
        0
        Quote: pofigisst74
        If you do not dial two dozen, then you are a troll!

        laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. BABAY22
        BABAY22 4 January 2016 02: 08 New
        +3
        The Russian-Persian war of 1796 - started by the Russians in fulfillment of the obligations of the St. George Treaty, as a response to the military operations of the Persians in the Caucasus, a military victory.

        The Russian-Swedish war of 1808-1809 - started by the Russians as part of the Anglo-Russian war against the English allies, a military victory, the annexation of Finland.

        Russian-Turkish war (1828-1829) - started by the Russians, episode of the wars for the independence of Greece, military victory, ter. acquisitions (Moldova, Danube Delta, Georgia, eastern side of the Black Sea)

        The war of Russia against the Khiva khanate of 1835-1840 is a counter-terrorist operation of the Russian expeditionary force on the right bank of the Caspian, in response to the robber actions of the Khiva and Kyrgyz

        The Polish uprising of 1863 - the suppression of Russian civil uprising on the ter. Poland and Lithuania.

        The Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878 - started by the Russians, in response to the brutality of the Turks in the Balkans, a military victory, the return of Bessarabia

        Ihe-Tuan uprising of 1899-1901 - the participation of Russian troops in the suppression of the civil uprising, during which they suffered, including Russian settlers in China, which grew into a full-scale war of the Anglo-Russian-Japanese-American coalition against China

        The Soviet-Finnish War (1939-1940) - the USSR began, with the aim of pushing the border of the hostile state from Leningrad (comp. 40 km before the war), victory, ter. acquisitions (Karelia, Southern Finland)

        Soviet-Japanese War (1945) - the USSR began in pursuance of an alliance agreement with the United States, victory, the return of Sakhalin, the acquisition of the Kuril Islands

        The Afghan War (1979-1989) - started by the USSR with the goal of overthrowing the pro-American regime.


        This list is far from complete.
        Offhand, there was absolutely no participation of the Cossacks in expanding the Empire’s possessions to the Urals, Southern Siberia, Amur Region, the Far East, and Kamchatka. The conquest of Chukotka is not covered.
        1. pofigisst74
          pofigisst74 4 January 2016 11: 43 New
          -2
          You still tell about the Swedes near Poltava! And about the Nazis near Stalingrad! laughing
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. BABAY22
        BABAY22 4 January 2016 10: 50 New
        +6
        Quote: pofigisst74
        list TWO Dozen wars that Russia began. With dates and details! If you do not dial two dozen, then you are a troll!

        First of all, dear, you and I did not drink to the Brudershaft, and therefore I do not need to poke.
        And secondly, I accept your offer, but with the condition that if I fulfill it (I list what you asked for, then you will be an old man VOID, ILLUSTER AND IVAN DO NOT KIND OF KIND. And besides, take care of yourself for 90 days.

        Well. Go.

        The Livonian War (1558 - 1583) - started by the Russians to lift the trade blockade from the Hansa, Sweden, Lithuania and Poland (R.P.) took turns in Livonia, the result is extremely unsuccessful (the loss of almost the entire northwest and Belarusian lands)

        Russian-Swedish war (1590-1595) - launched by the Russians, successful, minor acquisitions of territories in Karelia

        Smolensk war (1631-1634) - started by the Russians against the Poles for the return of Smolensk lands, military and political draw

        Russian-Polish war 1654-1667 - started by the Russians for the return of Western lands, successful, significant territorial acquisitions (Smolensk, left-bank Little Russia, Seversk, Kiev)

        The Russo-Turkish War (1686-1700) - started by the Russians as part of the pan-European military alliance against Turkey, was fought for including access to the Black Sea, military draw, territorial acquisitions giving access to Azov

        The Northern War (1700-1721) - the war was launched by the Russians for the return of the northwestern lands and access to the Baltic, a military victory, significant ter. acquisitions (Izhora, Livonia, Estonia, southern Finland)

        Persian campaign 1722-23 - started by the Russians, military victory, ter. acquisitions in the Caspian region (for a short time)

        Russian-Turkish war of 1735-1739 - started by the Russians, military and political draw

        Russian-Polish war of 1792 - started by the Russians, military victory, the return of the West Russian lands (Pinsk, Polesie, Podolia, Volyn)

        Uprising Kosciuszko (1794) - the suppression of Russian civil uprising in Poland.
        1. pofigisst74
          pofigisst74 4 January 2016 11: 51 New
          -1
          These are all historical facts far-fetched, taken out of the context of events! The long-known technique of Western behavior! It even seems to me that these are quotes from Wikipedia. If you consider the above more closely, then in reality it will turn out the opposite!
        2. pofigisst74
          pofigisst74 4 January 2016 12: 13 New
          -1
          I chose, offhand, the Russian-Swedish war of 1590-1595. You mentioned, and looked at the wiki, for fun! So, there it is written in Russian in white and white that this war began because of King Sigismund's attacks on the Russian border garrisons! We defended ourselves! You are lying! request
          1. BABAY22
            BABAY22 4 January 2016 13: 02 New
            +5
            Yes, you, my friend, are not honestly playing.
            First, ask a question, initially implying that it is impossible to give an answer to it:
            list TWO Dozen wars that Russia began. With dates and details!

            And when, to your considerable surprise, you receive a detailed answer, then you begin to flail, hastily seek excuses for your defeat, use propaganda cliches:
            The long-known technique of Western behavior! It even seems to me that these are quotes from Wikipedia

            This will not work.
            And in general, what difference does it make from which source my information was taken from - Wikipedia, memoirs of participants in events or inscriptions on the fence. This does not change the essence of the matter.
            What is even more ridiculous is the fact that you yourself, to check my facts, rushed to leaf through Wikipedia.
            The conclusion suggests itself.
            If you consider yourself to be the person responsible for your word, then according to our agreement with you, you will merge for 3 months. Well, if you think that there are only two points of view: the wrong one and yours and you don’t need to answer for your words, then go the straight road to your place, and you (the place) yourself know where (remember the words of Nikola Pitersky addressed to Associate Professor )
            I am taking my leave for the sim. Goodbye.
            hi
            1. pofigisst74
              pofigisst74 4 January 2016 13: 29 New
              -9
              We did not agree on anything! wink You lied again! lol
              1. BABAY22
                BABAY22 4 January 2016 14: 14 New
                +2
                As I understand it, the choice is made.
                Well, well, you have to live with it.
                Live and remember who you are now.
                sad
        3. dzeredzavkomimu
          dzeredzavkomimu 5 January 2016 04: 11 New
          0
          Three wars have begun for the return of land, this is not an attack, suppression of upheaval in their state, this is not an attack on another state, they forgot the Finnish, Russian-Japanese, and the liberation of China, and now they attacked the igil in Syria. Or, according to your .. creep .. should we ignore the aggression of other countries?
          1. BABAY22
            BABAY22 5 January 2016 16: 47 New
            0
            Quote: dzeredzavkomimu
            dzeredzavkomimu

            Dear, you are reading inattentively.
            I have listed both Finnish and Russian-Japanese, see posts a little higher (it happened because of problems with moderation). My attitude to these wars is also indicated there.
            Quote: BABAY22
            I don’t understand why the idea that Russia never started the war first is very popular?
            Are we so weak and we have no Interests?
            Yes, over the past 500 years, you can count a couple of dozen wars that Russia launched against other states.
            So what?
            Never mind.
            What, Joseph Vissarionovich was wrong in 1940, when ...

            Read carefully.
            hi
        4. Tagil
          Tagil 6 January 2016 15: 00 New
          -3
          and what is there to conquer Chukotka! They came and said to the Chukchi: - "Will you be called Petya or Vasya, or you will get it in your ear!" that's all the conquest! people are slowly but surely dying out! "You" even this small people have forbidden to fish without quotas on boats and drink vodka, as the Americans used to drink Indians!
          1. antaeus
            antaeus 6 January 2016 15: 10 New
            0
            Unfortunately you are mistaken. The Americans were drinking vodka for the Chukchi, it was closer to them from Alaska, they organized trade there. The Russians mainly carried gunpowder, ammunition, and hardware. And in Chukotka it’s living better now than in some cities in Europe. Thanks to Roma and Vova. According to quotas, they have always been with indigenous peoples. This is prescribed by law.
  • veksha50
    veksha50 3 January 2016 20: 48 New
    +9
    "Fortunately, Russia exists. And she cannot be defeated"...

    A good article ... And that Russia has always been alone is also well noted by the author ...

    Judging by the mood of Putin's New Year greetings, we can say that once again the call may sound: "Get up, the country is huge ... Get up to mortal battle" ...

    I think that the liberal-pro-Western-minded people here are all the same lesser, and most of us, regardless of age and sores, will take up arms if necessary ...

    All again, Happy New Year, and God grant that Russia continues to rise and develop in the new year, no matter who says anything or whatever dirty tricks ...
  • VB
    VB 3 January 2016 20: 53 New
    +3
    Brilliant article. Well done author. Do not decrease nor add
  • dobrovic
    dobrovic 3 January 2016 20: 58 New
    -2
    nice to read, only to French publications has little to do. By reference - a translation from another resource (in English and Russian), the author - was born in Leningrad ... why pretend? ..
  • tolancop
    tolancop 3 January 2016 21: 04 New
    +2
    Minus for the name of the material. Forgiveness implies GUILT. And what is Russia's fault before the West? Russia, in my deep conviction, somehow does not need "forgiveness" from the West ... This is the mantra of pro-Western liberals that "Russia must repent for ..." FOR EVERYTHING !!! They will grind.
  • Andrei946
    Andrei946 3 January 2016 21: 06 New
    +1
    The author convincingly proved that Russia is be, not Russia in be. So the West made efforts to civilize Russia according to its patterns. Only the Russian mentality is not like that. There was no slavery in Russia, and that says a lot. And it’s time for the West to admit that when their women fought for their rights, the color fought for their rights, and in the USSR people dreamed of interplanetary travel. And the first in the world to realize this dream.
  • vv3
    vv3 3 January 2016 21: 18 New
    +4
    Europe is well-fed, prosperous in appearance, `` black '' in soul. These waves of the Inquisition, cynicism of betrayal, immense meanness, fierce hatred and complete corruption. Hundreds of times ill with the plague and other diseases, hiding heaps of debris and dirt. All this forever lays off like rings on a cut of a tree. No, I'm not against the Europeans. Do not mind until they start teaching us. Who gave them the right to teach us. I am proud that I am Russian; I consider us a hundred times cleaner and nobler. And we do not teach anyone ... And I don’t want to talk about the States, sorry, a country without history, without faith ... They have only one faith, in their green piece of paper, and even then they draw it themselves ...
  • RUS69
    RUS69 3 January 2016 21: 18 New
    +1
    As they said in the famous film "get tired of swallowing dust" !!!!
  • Stariknv
    Stariknv 3 January 2016 21: 19 New
    +1
    I completely agree with the author. The United States and European countries consider themselves superpowers that dictate their order of thorium leads to wars, and Russia has to establish peace on the whole earth at the cost of great efforts and losses.
  • Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 3 January 2016 21: 31 New
    +3
    Russia fights and beats with heart, spirit and to the end, without looking back. Therefore, it cannot be defeated.
  • tokens3
    tokens3 3 January 2016 21: 55 New
    -7
    In a historical perspective, Russia intuitively fought for the survival of all mankind.

    Yeah. Apparently in the event of a nuclear conflict, nuclear warheads will intuitively fly to Western cities for freedom and survival. lol
    Brad.
    Yes, the Russian people have never fought for someone’s freedom and survival. What did WWII fight for the freedom of the German people? No, of course.
    They fought with such frenzy that they didn’t take prisoners during the bloody battles.
    All this propaganda husk about the missionary mission of the Russian people obscures the eyes of many in the West. The "clichés" of the Soviet Union are still not released.
    Naive.
    1. CB activist
      CB activist 3 January 2016 23: 14 New
      +1
      lexei3, the struggle against fascism was a struggle for the future of all mankind, including the future of the German people, for the German people had no future in the fascist project. Ukraine is now demonstrating this in a cartoon form. Well, they got into Bandera's fascism, and what?, Where is their future? Where, where, in "Karaganda", that's where. You need to grow wiser, leksey, then your head will no longer be visited by "nasty nasty things" about the fact that Russian messianism is just a husk.

      Remember, lexe3, in fascism, the people overlap their eyes on its History, and stubbornly impose a certain myth. And myth is an attribute not of a nation, but of an ethnos, tribe. Achievements of culture developed by this people, with its regression to the tribal state, of course, are also not needed. So it turns out that the USSR fought not only for itself, but also for the great German culture.

      And I’ll also say: all peoples have a future in the framework of the communist project, but in the framework of the bourgeois project there is no future, because the bourgeois project stubbornly slides to fascism, as History shows.
      1. tokens3
        tokens3 3 January 2016 23: 46 New
        -5
        CB activist
        leksey3, the struggle against fascism was a struggle for the future of all mankind, including and for the future of the German people

        I think ... if YOU were a political instructor in the winter of 1941 and would push these speeches before the formation on the eve of an enemy tank attack ...
        You would not be understood, to put it mildly. Most likely they would have let a bullet along an "unpredictable" trajectory.
        So it turns out that the USSR fought not only for itself, but also for the great German culture.

        But do you know your own culture is closer. Yes, and what kind of culture is this that makes animals out of people? So garbage.
        You need to grow wiser, leksey, then your head will no longer be visited by "nasty nasty things" about the fact that Russian messianism is just a husk.

        Yes ... apparently it's too late for you to grow wise. I'm sorry.
        However, I have to note that Russian messianism is a yoke on which the West deftly "shakes out" the pockets of my people.
        In the words of Kiselev. How long?
        1. CB activist
          CB activist 4 January 2016 00: 25 New
          +1
          1. Each situation and each time has its own speech and its level of understanding. Incidentally, the level of understanding that fascism is a threat to European culture was demonstrated by such European intellectuals and anti-fascists as Thomas Mann and Antoine de Saint-Exupery.
          2. You, Lex 3, are generally far from culture. It is not culture (any) that makes animals out of people, but its oblivion, the experience of fascism proves this.
          3. The liberals of the 90s who put the collar on Russia to please the West did not say anything about Russian messianism.
          4. You have here "proverbs according to Freud": "my own culture", "my people." It is evident that you cannot write simply: "Russian culture is closest to me". Your subconscious mind resists such words. Are you a Russophobe hiding behind patriotic rhetoric?

          To grow wiser, grow wiser and again grow wise, token 3.
          1. tokens3
            tokens3 4 January 2016 00: 54 New
            -1
            CB activist
            It is not culture (any) that makes animals out of people, but its oblivion, the experience of fascism proves this.

            Wrong.
            All ideologues of Nazism and Fascism were in fact "conductors" of the ideas of the Western intellectual elites.
            Moreover, to step over ethical standards for the sake of a higher goal is the main law of the West.
            It has always been like this:
            And when they drove the crusaders, with the ideas of messianism.
            And when they drove Napoleon, who arose due to the chaos arranged by freethinkers.
            Culture is the "shaft" for the spear.
            And this spear does not always look "with its eyes to the sky."
            Can look directly at you.
            To grow wiser, grow wiser and again grow wise, token 3.

            Thanks, you too.
            1. CB activist
              CB activist 4 January 2016 01: 54 New
              +2
              You are mistaken, Lex 3.
              I have already said, but only you did not notice that the bourgeois project ends and inevitably slides towards fascism. Already at the beginning of the 20th century, it was clear to the most sophisticated observers that the bourgeois project could no longer offer humanity except an unfolding spiral of atrocities. Read "Retribution" by A. Blok, if, of course, your "own culture" will allow you.

              Accordingly, everything is not the way you wrote, but exactly the opposite.
              The bourgeois political and financial elites, realizing that the bourgeois project was coming to an end, came to the realization of the need to develop some new strategy. The intellectual community was involved in this work (as executors of the order), of course, not all polls, but who agreed. Thomas Mann, Erich Fromm, Victor Frankl, Antoine de Saint-Exupery, naturally, did not agree. And those who agreed came to the conclusion that the only humanistic alternative to the bourgeois is communism, in communism there is a place for humanism, but there is no place for bourgeois financial and political elites. Then the Customers decided that they needed a new project, where they had a place, even if there was no place for humanism in it. The intellectual community contracted for this work has produced a product that meets the wishes of the customer. Here's fascism in all its "glory". The bourgeois customer decided that if there is no place for him in History, then so much the worse for History, it must be stopped.

              Thus, the "intellectual elites of the West" are themselves the intellectual servants of the bourgeoisie. M. Gorky wrote about this in his article "Proletarian Humanism" in 1934.
    2. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 3 January 2016 23: 17 New
      +1
      After the end of World War II, the Germans did not die out, did not disappear!
      1. Azitral
        Azitral 4 January 2016 03: 06 New
        0
        Large nations do not disappear so quickly. Having received a mortal blow, they agonize both a century and a half. The Americans castrated Germany. For good or for worse is another question.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  • tehnokrat
    tehnokrat 3 January 2016 22: 01 New
    +4
    The author of the article "+", and thank you for your kind words!

    I hope, however, that in its actions Russia is more guided by common sense,
    the very "perceived need" rather than emotions, as it may seem
    after reading the article.
  • Pirogov
    Pirogov 3 January 2016 22: 17 New
    +6
    It’s good that there are still people in Europe.
  • Belarus
    Belarus 3 January 2016 22: 35 New
    +4
    Why the West will never win and never forgive Russia


    In short: because it is Russia.
  • Foresterer
    Foresterer 3 January 2016 22: 59 New
    +3
    Thank you very much to the author, you must definitely repost. 4 minuses from four, afraid of the truth, justice and punishment, it is a little. The usual percentage of those who later, when Russia arrives, hides in caches.
  • pofigisst74
    pofigisst74 3 January 2016 23: 17 New
    +2
    This article was a couple of days ago at INOSMI. there are many comments. who wants to come in!