Rosoboronexport will display combat robots on the international market

60
Rosoboronexport will start promoting military robots, including the Uran-9 robotic complex, to the international market, the company's press service said.

Rosoboronexport will display combat robots on the international market


“Russian developers have all the necessary competencies for creating modern military robotics, which will be in demand on the international market. This is an actively developing segment, so Rosoboronexport will build a long-term marketing strategy to promote such samples, including as part of comprehensive security projects, ”the newspaper quotes the message. MIC.

The “Uran-9” complex is intended for remote reconnaissance and fire support of combined-arms, reconnaissance and anti-terrorist units. It consists of two reconnaissance and fire support robots, a tractor for transporting them, and a mobile control point, ”the press service explained.

According to the information, “armament of reconnaissance and fire support robots includes the 30-mm automatic gun 2А72 and the 7,62-mm machine gun coupled with it, anti-tank guided missiles“ Attack ””. It is noted that the composition of weapons "may vary depending on customer requirements."

According to the company, the robots "are equipped with a laser radiation warning system and equipment for detecting, recognizing and tracking targets."

  • Rosoboronexport
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    30 December 2015 18: 04
    This is the "meat grinder" - the highest class !!!
    1. +3
      30 December 2015 18: 06
      And here comes the fundamental question of robotics. Can a person harm a robot with artificial intelligence? The answer is yes. And what's more interesting: can a robot harm a human? So far, Spot can not respond to a kick in the side. But 50 years will pass and it is unknown who else will have a whip in the manipulator, and who will be in slavery? ..
      1. +13
        30 December 2015 18: 15
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        And here comes the fundamental question of robotics. Can a person harm a robot with artificial intelligence? The answer is yes. And what's more interesting: can a robot harm a human? So far, Spot can not respond to a kick in the side. But 50 years will pass and it is unknown who else will have a whip in the manipulator, and who will be in slavery? ..


        Yes, it is too early to raise such a question. Banal external management. 15 years later, you can compare the clock again to say: "wow, he now works independently according to the program, where there is a list of tasks and a reconciliation base, no comrades, after all, this is not AI yet, we disagree, we will leave the topic to grandchildren."
        1. +4
          30 December 2015 18: 30
          Several manned combat vehicles were called "terminators", but I think that the most unpopular name in the VO would suit this particular vehicle ...
          1. +9
            30 December 2015 18: 35
            It took 80 years to fully implement the project of a remote-controlled tank, defended by Tukhachevsky.
            1. +7
              30 December 2015 19: 55
              this is not an alternative reality for you! this kapets is shorter!
          2. +8
            30 December 2015 19: 12
            Unlike Google's one-eyed krakozyabra, the KAMAZ-self-propelled vehicle, even though slowly, drives not on the asphalt in a city washed with powder, but on an intersection. Of course, we will sell to especially advanced ones, let them bother, and if necessary, we will stop selling them. History repeats itself. But this is all a trifle, did you notice what happened with the arrival of "Armata", "Kurganets" ??? New principle of building armor !!! My first question after the appearance of photos and videos from the preparation of the 2015 parade - why are they all so tall? Second question: And what about the third ??? Now I look at these photos and enjoy it !!! If the degree of protection of the BRDM is increased to BMPT based on the T-72, so at least call it a teapot !!! And do not care that the space for the crew has decreased, so we will compensate with those brains. And do not care that the body has become 20cm higher. Even so, it is almost half a meter lower than the Bradley. Fine! The main thing in Russian tank building was a qualitative move. It is a move, not a breakthrough, towards a single concept, and not just a single tank. There will be no breakthrough, do not wait, but structurally for factories and MTO this is exactly what is needed.
            1. -9
              30 December 2015 19: 17
              Quote: NDR-791
              Unlike Google’s one-eyed krakozyabry, the Kamaz-self-propelled gun even though slowly, but doesn’t drive on asphalt in a powder-washed town, but on an intersection.

              when your KоMAZ also in the project there were no competitions of unmanned vehicles so that is enough to carry nonsense.
              DARPA Grand Challenge 2004 [edit | edit wiki text]
              March 13, 2004. Prize fund - $ 1 million. 15 teams took part. Competitions began near the city of Barstow.
            2. +11
              30 December 2015 20: 09
              something inspired from youth ...
              (film "Short Circuit" fantasy 1986)
        2. +3
          30 December 2015 18: 33


          Yes, it is too early to raise such a question. Banal external management. 15 years later, you can compare the clock again to say: "wow, he now works independently according to the program, where there is a list of tasks and a reconciliation base, no comrades, after all, this is not AI yet, we disagree, we will leave the topic to the grandchildren"


          Grandchildren: "Grandfathers, b ... b, where did you look .. Kolya he is already here, fuck him ...., then we will write a message to the past!" wassat
    2. +4
      30 December 2015 18: 29
      And still, will there be a final statistic on the VO, how many aircraft, ships and other equipment were delivered to the troops for 2015? soldier
      1. 0
        30 December 2015 18: 33
        So it was already in my opinion?
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      30 December 2015 19: 03
      as in the terminator)
    4. +3
      30 December 2015 19: 10
      I want the same for the New Year! laughing
  2. 0
    30 December 2015 18: 05
    small it will pass well where large equipment does not pass on the other hand it can be destroyed by the same large equipment
  3. +7
    30 December 2015 18: 05
    Now the US Secretary of Defense must throw himself out of the window shouting "The robots are coming!"
  4. +1
    30 December 2015 18: 05
    The thing is very useful and can successfully work in a variety of fields. But I would like to know how their parts and services are equipped with them? Export is certainly a good thing, but you should not forget about your parts.
    1. 0
      30 December 2015 22: 46
      The thing is very useful and can successfully work in a variety of fields. But I would like to know how their parts and services are equipped with them? Export is certainly a good thing, but you should not forget about your parts ...................................... ...................................
      .................................................. ..............................
      .................................. Vanya is in his units and services!
  5. +3
    30 December 2015 18: 06
    Well guys give the best for the hill, earn a penny. Only surrenders to me from these contracts (I hope that they will) the lion's share will be received by all sorts of different intermediaries and super-managers.
    Yes, well done!
    1. +2
      30 December 2015 18: 20
      While the whole peg to the dollar, why be surprised, the main thing is to interest and attract foreign buyers. In general, there should be a national security policy in such matters as what weapons, to whom and how much can be sold, while they are not in sufficient quantities in their army. Otherwise, with such selfish motivation, we will arm our competitors, and even probable opponents.
      1. 0
        31 December 2015 08: 25
        Sergei! You voiced the truth !!! What is happening in the field of arms exports is a complete mess. The oil feeder began to give less, so all the evil spirits pulled their dirty hands to arms. No one thinks about the Russian Army, if only to quickly fill your pocket. Those who do not understand, while not having anything from these deals, applaud intensely. Russia supposedly wins !? Bullshit. There are small ones! receipts and no more. For non-fulfillment of the state defense order, you can lose the position, and with a good deal, and on the bunk. When exporting, finances both came and went, and all no emotions. Professionals who made the technique a little throw and that's it !!!
    2. +6
      30 December 2015 18: 29
      If the turret is larger, it will be similar. The State Department will not be satisfied with plagiarism.
      1. +2
        30 December 2015 19: 21
        kil 31

        Identity drew attention. Some sort of Sherman, mutated.
        1. +2
          30 December 2015 22: 14
          Personally, this pepelats reminded me of a mini-BMD .... If it can also change the clearance ... then ...
      2. 0
        1 January 2016 18: 13
        kil 31
        If the turret is larger, it will be similar. The State Department will not be satisfied with plagiarism.

        rather, the American M8 self-propelled gun is closer. Based on the light M5.
  6. +19
    30 December 2015 18: 06
    It has long been started to use such wedges.
    I thought Israel would be the first, but Russia was ahead
    in Syria.
    We have such "buggies" are used only for the patrol service,
    but we must learn to introduce tracked combat vehicles into battle.
    1. +2
      30 December 2015 18: 25
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It has long been started to use such wedges.

      As a mess, you got the first sentence, as if you started one thought, and then continued another.
    2. +2
      30 December 2015 18: 26
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Russia is ahead
      in Syria.

      Do ours use them in Syria?
      1. +4
        30 December 2015 18: 47
        Quote: Sith Lord
        As a mess, you got the first sentence, as if you started one thought, and then continued another.

        So, there is from what ... smile

        WSJ: NSA intercepted talks between Israeli authorities and US congressmen

        And then suddenly ... winked
        1. +3
          30 December 2015 18: 58
          And then suddenly ...

          Come on, quit. Israel annually receives $ 3 billion from overseas sponsors, and on 2016, it asked for 5 lard. They are not given for beautiful eyes. And the situation with wiretapping is reminiscent of bugs in the wayward wife’s handbags, which the incredulous spouse put into it.
      2. +4
        30 December 2015 19: 18
        "Do ours use them in Syria?" ////

        There was such an infa. So far, no one has denied it.
        1. +4
          30 December 2015 19: 56
          Yes, somewhere it was reported about the use of such "toys" in Syria, but somehow briefly. Against a serious army with electronic warfare means, such robots may not work, but against the spirits the very thing. hi
          1. +1
            31 December 2015 00: 56
            Quote: Kasym
            Yes, somewhere it was reported about the use of such "toys" in Syria, but somehow briefly. Against a serious army with electronic warfare means, such robots may not work, but against the spirits the very thing. hi

            fit, it's a semiautomatic device
      3. +10
        30 December 2015 19: 51
        Quote: Vladimirets
        And ours in Syria use them

        It seems to apply
        For the first time in the world, an attack was carried out on the fortified area of ​​militants with combat robots. In the province of Latakia, the army units of the Syrian army, with the support of Russian specialists and Russian combat robots, took a strategic height of 754,5, the Siriatel Tower.

        More recently, the Chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, General Gerasimov, said that Russia is striving to fully robotize the battle, and perhaps soon we will become witnesses of how robotic groups independently conduct military operations, and this is what happened.
  7. +14
    30 December 2015 18: 07
    Can robots be in our ministry of economics? Maybe they will put things in order laughing
    1. +10
      30 December 2015 18: 16
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      Can robots be in our ministry of economics? Maybe they will put things in order laughing

      Nifiga! Bribery will be introduced at the program level laughing
      1. +3
        30 December 2015 18: 29
        We will "persuade" Kaspersky - write "antiprog" smile Recall past studies at the KGB of the USSR ... let them pay tribute.
  8. +1
    30 December 2015 18: 10
    Apparently not enough automatic grenade launcher caliber that way 25mm
    1. +1
      30 December 2015 18: 27
      Quote: denni
      Apparently not enough automatic grenade launcher caliber that way 25mm

      Yes, yes, and also the GK towers in 300mm. Yes
    2. 0
      31 December 2015 06: 23
      The article says that the equipment will be custom made. Will we order? wink
  9. +10
    30 December 2015 18: 12
    It is wrong to call this technique a robot. This is a Remote Controlled Machine (DUM). The robot is able to act independently, but this technique is not.
    1. +1
      30 December 2015 20: 26
      they are able to operate independently, at least "platform m", which is for export. unlike "Uranus 9" (and all other numbered Uranus), it is not offered, that is, it can completely autonomously select targets and hit ...
  10. +1
    30 December 2015 18: 18
    Terrible thing in appearance ... With proper management and interaction with the troops, it is very useful! Dear to see ... and still we need it! Many lives of our soldiers can save, and this is important! hi
  11. +10
    30 December 2015 18: 23
    Min.defense urgently needed WOT players with high efficiency)))
  12. +6
    30 December 2015 18: 24
    Maybe now the current WoT players from the army will stop mowing. They will find things to their liking.)))
  13. 0
    30 December 2015 18: 25
    Quote: wizarden
    It is wrong to call this technique a robot. This is a Remote Controlled Machine (DUM). The robot is able to act independently, but this technique is not.

    Well, or maybe a drone ... if by American
  14. +1
    30 December 2015 18: 26
    May appear in dill. Here they will be a dudger. smile
    1. +4
      30 December 2015 18: 30
      Gee-gee. The Russian army invaded, but again there is no Russian! Yokarny Babai!)))
    2. 0
      30 December 2015 19: 00
      Quote from Chis2009diman
      May appear in dill. Here they will be a dudger. smile

      It is necessary to ask "KARS", "OPLOT" will not mind if we give a couple of "URAN-9" to LDNR.
  15. +1
    30 December 2015 18: 28
    The beauty! I would not refuse his scale model 1:18 on the radio control!
  16. 0
    30 December 2015 18: 35
    Business by business, but if only they wouldn’t use this weapon against us later
    1. 0
      30 December 2015 18: 51
      Well, really, will China and India fight against us?
      1. -2
        31 December 2015 02: 52
        Quote: Leia Organa
        Well, really, will China and India fight against us?

        not so long ago, everyone said so about "krymnash" ...
  17. 0
    30 December 2015 18: 39
    looks amazing in Syria for a run-in, show in action and the line itself will line up bully
  18. 0
    30 December 2015 18: 41
    So they’ve already built a couple of armies, are they planning to sell them over the hill? Or does our army not appear in the list of possessors as convenient complexes?
  19. 0
    30 December 2015 18: 42
    Beauty!!! good
  20. -1
    30 December 2015 19: 07
    If not for Serdyukovism, then these robots would have ridden in Syria long ago!
  21. +1
    30 December 2015 19: 16
    Pretty interesting platform. But I would like to know about her protection from small arms. What autonomy (in every sense). Also, the communication range with the operator in an urban environment. The degree of stability of this relationship.

    Honestly, this is more of a toy and a laboratory sample. Model for testing technology. A real combat vehicle, I think, will appear no earlier than in about 15 years. But the fact that we are doing this is pleasing.
    1. 0
      30 December 2015 20: 07
      Quote: cobra77
      Honestly, this is more of a toy and a laboratory sample. Model for testing technology. The real fighting vehicle, I think, will appear no earlier than in 15 years.

      Everything is more optimistic, look here for example http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/71993/
  22. 0
    30 December 2015 19: 22
    New-these are the forgotten old: radio-controlled were back in time before the Second World War (tv-18 and tt-26). In modern conditions, in the presence of electronic warfare, this becomes problematic.
  23. +1
    30 December 2015 19: 31
    The Rosoboronexport company will begin to promote combat robots, including the Uran-9 robotic system, on the international market

    that our army has already been equipped with them, or will we rearm others and use the trash ourselves?
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. bad
    +3
    30 December 2015 20: 14
    Quote: BaxBan
    Quote: NDR-791
    Unlike Google’s one-eyed krakozyabry, the Kamaz-self-propelled gun even though slowly, but doesn’t drive on asphalt in a powder-washed town, but on an intersection.

    when your KоMAZ also in the project there were no competitions of unmanned vehicles so that is enough to carry nonsense.
    DARPA Grand Challenge 2004 [edit | edit wiki text]
    March 13, 2004. Prize fund - $ 1 million. 15 teams took part. Competitions began near the city of Barstow.
    when your darpa was not there, Soviet designers designed and made a radio-controlled "teletank" in metal that fought to a limited extent in the Finnish war ... for rudeness ..
  26. 0
    30 December 2015 20: 31
    He's a third generation ATGM "fired forget" is not enough.
  27. 0
    30 December 2015 21: 58
    I want to brag! My company made parts for these products!
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. 0
    30 December 2015 22: 23
    We need them for real tests in Syria - to control the border with Turkey. Yes, and the border with Lebanon, Jordan and Israel too. As incorruptible border guards - they are the most.
  30. eaz
    -1
    30 December 2015 22: 59
    so horrible ... a good point and infantry runoff can be put .. about tanks not sure .. but still ... respect
    as if in Tukhachkv)))
  31. eaz
    0
    30 December 2015 23: 00
    stupid traitor homeland
  32. 0
    30 December 2015 23: 42
    Quote: Jura
    Quote: cobra77
    Honestly, this is more of a toy and a laboratory sample. Model for testing technology. The real fighting vehicle, I think, will appear no earlier than in 15 years.

    Everything is more optimistic, look here for example http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/71993/


    Hmmm. I'm afraid this is a fake, how unfortunate. Photos from exercises and just from Syria, but without the DUMA. Here where to read about this DUM? Especially about the control system, guidance, range, etc. And so far it is more like a radio-controlled typewriter with a camera. This is something (without a camera) even before the Second World War. Just did not go into the series. Found it a little effective with that level of technology.
  33. 0
    30 December 2015 23: 57
    Quote: lopvlad
    The Rosoboronexport company will begin to promote combat robots, including the Uran-9 robotic system, on the international market

    that our army has already been equipped with them, or will we rearm others and use the trash ourselves?


    Well, taking into account the dampness of the technology, the best experiments are on cats .... foreign buyers. Count beta testers for their money.
  34. +1
    31 December 2015 02: 20
    And our troops again shish !? Not a single country sells the latest technology and advanced developments abroad, but at first it equips its army with them. And only we are ready to sell everything, regardless of the military security of our country!
  35. 0
    2 January 2016 21: 21
    Fucking handsome, but wait a minute? export? and in our troops?
  36. 0
    6 January 2016 18: 15
    It remains to make domestic chassis on Uranus and there will be order.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"