In the grouping of strategic nuclear forces replenishment - 2 th regiment of the PC "YARS"

28
In the grouping of strategic nuclear forces replenishment - 2 th regiment of the PC "YARS"


In the 54 th division of the Strategic Missile Forces, ready to start the combat duty of the 2 th regiment of soil complexes of mobile execution "Yars".

Now, together with Topol-M, the complexes constitute the main core of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation.

Since the complex "Yars" was created on the basis of the complex "Topol-M", you can with a clear conscience call it a smaller brother. All characteristics related to the deployed characteristics and data used missiles RS-24, kept secret. It is known only that the weight of the rocket has changed due to the increase in the warhead and other elements. The Yars complex carries up to four nuclear-filled units, the range has remained unchanged and is no less than 10 000 kilometers.

But the main advantage of the new complex is the highest survivability of the used missiles, in the creation of which they used technological developments, which have no analogues in the competition.

According to some experts, these complexes will be relevant for at least a quarter of a century. This means that missiles can with high probability overcome any missile defense system.

Probably exactly that weapon meant when the head of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev, talked about re-equipping units of the Strategic Missile Forces and submarines with promising and highly efficient complexes that have a high probability of overcoming the missile defense system of a “potential enemy”.



Designers who developed Topol-M, Yars and Bulava declare with full responsibility that the improvement of indicators has been achieved through new control and communication technologies, due to which the trajectory of nuclear units is constantly changing. To hit these blocks, the missile defense system of Western countries is not able to.

Based on the START-3 agreement, the Russian Federation can significantly increase the nuclear potential of the Strategic Missile Forces. By 2017, the number of new Yars and Topol-M complexes in the ranks of the Strategic Missile Forces will increase by almost 75 percent. We all look forward to the emergence of a new heavy intercontinental ballistic missile, which is to replace the legendary Stilet and Satan on the battle post.

If it happens that the Russian Federation still comes out of the START-3 agreement, and we are seeing the prerequisites for this now, then it is very possible to return to the RVSN railway complexes - BZhRK, which were removed from the database according to the START-2 agreement.



It may very well be that Yars will be on the railroad track, because the capabilities of such complexes for survivability are simply amazing. Judge for yourself: in the United States made calculations, the result of which stunned them - if 25 railway complexes with nuclear weapons were dispersed over an area of ​​120 square kilometers and a nuclear strike on them using Satan-type missiles, the probability of hitting 10 percent.

Concern about building up a nuclear shield of the Russian Federation is well founded. Various missile defense complexes are gradually being chosen for the borders of Russia. It turns out that the units of the Strategic Missile Forces of Russia will be closely monitored, if not worse - at gunpoint.

Today, the “Voevod” ICBM can break through any missile defense system, and the Topol missiles were designed specifically for the highly effective missile defense of the United States. If the Voyevoda missiles could be said to have rammed the defenses using armored cover, then Topol already uses various technologies that today make them virtually innocent.

But, if the missiles are intercepted right after the launch or at the moment of entering the ballistic trajectory, then the missiles will be shot down almost guaranteed.

In this case, you can hit a missile with either a missile defense missile or a weapon using the latest technologies - beam, laser and electromagnetic.



The United States constantly announces to the world about the successful tests of a new anti-missile weapon, such as a laser gun or a combat electromagnetic system, and all this for some reason as part of the improvement of the American missile defense system.

If the United States develops its missile defense at home, it is unclear how the US borders have reached the territory of Russia. Their goal, of course, is quite simple - in the absence of the opportunity to knock down the missiles after entering a ballistic trajectory, to knock them over the territory of Russia at the moment of launch.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    November 30, 2011
    Penetrating pencil! They can draw damn good things on the world map, if that! Yusov, I wonder if there is an eraser against him or is it "a great secret!" More "Yars" - good and different !!!
    1. +14
      November 30, 2011
      Well, this is not a pencil, but just an eraser, to erase aggressively-minded people from the world map wink
  2. ESCANDER
    +14
    November 30, 2011
    In, again, they started talking about nuclear trains.
    Traveled was Veshch. In vain they just broke it.
    1. 0
      November 30, 2011
      "Poezdyuk", on these very trains. :)
    2. +7
      November 30, 2011
      Unfortunately, our far-sighted politicians fled to the distillations ... to lick, and cut these trains ...
      And, if they didn't cut it, now they didn't even have to scare them with Iskander. Just in Kaliningrad on a sunny day, open the doors and raise the "pencil"! And, close the doors ..... EVERYTHING !!!! Would be the most low cost !!!!! way to answer!
      With Pindos, you should always have an ace up your sleeve. You can't play fair with these "partners"!
      1. vadimus
        +4
        November 30, 2011
        We need more hedgehogs like a hedgehog!
        1. Sergh
          +2
          November 30, 2011
          Aha, instead of each needle, in such a forest "hello"! String fungi.
    3. +1
      November 30, 2011
      Yes, yes, the most train trains in the world.
  3. +1
    November 30, 2011
    "By 2017, the new complexes" Yars "and" Topol-M "in the ranks of the Strategic Missile Forces will increase by almost 75 percent"
    Can’t you get any early?
    1. vadimus
      0
      November 30, 2011
      Such a respectable decent reptile. Can Germans, well done
  4. 0
    November 30, 2011
    Poplar. Yesterday was the RS-12, now the RS-24 ... Have you put new brakes on the controllers?
  5. semenar
    +2
    November 30, 2011
    timhelmet,
    You can’t, problems with materials, read Solomonov’s interview. By the way, we did BZHRK in Pavlograd. There is experience, but if you agree on the money, then in general it will be good. UMZ Dnepropetrovsk received money to extend the resource of strategists for Russia. They did Satan with us ...
    1. +1
      November 30, 2011
      And I served at the BZHRK. :) Good "product".
      1. itr
        +3
        November 30, 2011
        I ask you to explain the better solid-propellant rockets compared to liquid ones.
        I believe that liquid ones are better they fly on pulling more Even Satan is liquid and the name was given to horror simply
        And ours are lobbying for solid fuels. Well, yes, they have amer’s, but ours didn’t learn how to do them.
        So maybe you still need to do more liquid
        and not go on about Muscovites who obviously poke weak development
        You can simply compare the Mace and Sineva, or the Liner Mace simply sucks, but for a start it doesn’t even fly normally
        1. +3
          November 30, 2011
          The service life associated with the leakage of liquid fuel.
          And so both systems are full of pros and cons
          1. itr
            +1
            November 30, 2011
            Well then I got up to replace fuel
            or based on having missiles to replace is not a problem
            Well, what is 4 charges of 300 kilotons so zilch
            Imagine if at least one Satan reaches his goal, 20 Mt.
            Yars only mash Europe
            But African Americans of only this type of Satan out of 100 will fly at least 10% and all Long live the Stone Age!
            1. +1
              November 30, 2011
              18 kilotons were dropped on Nagasaki, don't give a damn 300 - zilch. I would not want this zilch to fall from me even in the 500 km.
              And for the Stone Age, it is not necessary to launch them
        2. +1
          November 30, 2011
          Even Satan is liquid and the name was given a horror simply.

          And we had solid fuel at the BZHRK ...
        3. ESCANDER
          +4
          November 30, 2011
          itr
          Advantages of solid fuel ICBMs:
          - Production organized in the territory of the Russian Federation (liquid produced in Ukraine)
          - A shorter (two to four times) active section of the trajectory, which is very important for overcoming missile defense.
          - Resistant to the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion and to laser weapons.
          - Mobility.
          The advantages of liquid ICBMs:
          - Great power.
          - Ability to carry a large number of warheads.
          - The large abandoned weight of heavy ICBMs allows you to carry more false targets to overcome missile defense.
          - Less vulnerability for sabotage groups.

          It seems like by 2018 they want to start deploying a new heavy liquid ICBM to replace the Satan. The rocket will be produced in Miass. That is, apparently, on the basis of the Sineva SLBM.
          1. itr
            +1
            November 30, 2011
            Build in Miass!
          2. dimarm74
            0
            November 30, 2011
            Where does infa come from in Miass? What will be done ... liquid and mine-based? There is no case to read references?
            1. ESCANDER
              0
              November 30, 2011
              dimarm74
              According to the former chief of the main headquarters of the Strategic Missile Forces, now a consultant to the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Colonel General Viktor Yesin.
              Plan mine.
              http://nvo.ng.ru/realty/2011-06-17/1_mbr.html
              1. dimarm74
                +1
                November 30, 2011
                ESCANDER
                Thank you so much. Read. In general, of course, it’s much easier to get out of SLBM ICBMs .... and the Makeyevites will be loaded head over heels .....
                sort of like "Liner" made, they say they say no worse than "Bulava", but again liquid ... Although this is not bad ..... for almost 25 years of operation of SLBM "Sineva" not a single accident .... ugh. ...Ugh...
        4. Commoner
          0
          November 30, 2011
          I recall that solid fuel cells are more compact and lighter than tanks with liquid fuel. RDTT control systems are simpler, but the process of restarting the solid propellant rocket motor is practically impossible. Maybe this is very old information :)
        5. 0
          November 30, 2011
          Solid fuel 8K98 we flew quite well in the seventies, and in the eighties I myself saw the launches of these products. Amazing sensations to the horror when you are at 500 m from the start.
      2. WOW
        WOW
        -1
        November 30, 2011
        Just because of such products of the USSR, it flew into the pipe.
        By the way, for those who are not up to date, MIT worked on research on the restoration of BZHRK with Yars and it was deemed inappropriate to restore it due to the fact that, with the same survivability in a retaliatory strike together with PGRK, the cost of BZHRK would reach heaven.
    2. +1
      November 30, 2011
      Reunite, not one b-will not stick!
  6. Perch_xnumx
    0
    November 30, 2011
    It is now necessary to raise the issue of restoring the BZHRK and pledge funds. And it would not be bad to dry bulk carriers river or barges to convert, on top of a bit of cargo. If that folds open and get hi aggressor.
    1. +1
      November 30, 2011
      The complex is easy to maintain. Mobility is higher than that of "Topol", 10 (!) BG, in addition to false ...
  7. Ion coaelung
    0
    November 30, 2011
    The United States constantly announces to the world about the successful tests of a new anti-missile weapon, such as a laser gun or a combat electromagnetic system, and all this for some reason as part of the improvement of the American missile defense system.

    If the United States develops its missile defense at home, it is unclear how the US borders have reached the territory of Russia. Their goal, of course, is quite simple - in the absence of the opportunity to knock down the missiles after entering a ballistic trajectory, to knock them over the territory of Russia at the moment of launch.


    It is necessary to give a decent answer to such provocations, so that there are no chances at all!
  8. Alexey Prikazchikov
    0
    November 30, 2011
    Cool, little by little updating our shield although in this case the sword smile
  9. dred
    +1
    November 30, 2011
    Yarssss rocket of my dreams.
  10. Artemka
    +1
    November 30, 2011
    This is true! There would be more of these, or something like just 291 complexes throughout the country. Although now probably already more.
  11. boos24
    +1
    November 30, 2011
    worthy change to the Poplars, but they will also serve without fail
  12. 0
    November 30, 2011
    offset))) good news)
  13. ZEBRASH
    +1
    November 30, 2011
    The news is good, but if only they didn’t fail at the crucial moment. And then lately it hurts often "rocket fall" is observed sad
  14. 0
    November 30, 2011
    Tremble and tremble, Western villains !!! tongue
  15. Evgeny B.
    0
    November 30, 2011
    Oh, sorry, so much time and money was wasted on "democracy", but it was necessary to improve and build equipment all the time!
    Then the American missile defense would not be on our doorstep.
    God forbid, now quickly restore everything and give people the opportunity to live well in their country and a sense of dignity and pride in their homeland!
  16. Odessa
    +1
    December 1 2011
    A huge "thank you" to VVP for the beautiful stroke of the pen, with which he put the BZHRK.Zh / d complex, which was really difficult to "graze" by means of space. observation due to the extensive network of railways in the Russian Federation and the similarity of the combat train with conventional civilian refrigerators. And all mobile Poplar and Yarsy are under constant close supervision. There are not so many of them and each complex is under several sights. that the same Topol will have time to launch an ICBM and will not be destroyed by saboteurs, etc. even before launch. Mine ICBMs are more significantly protected.
  17. wk
    +1
    December 1 2011
    an employee at work (a former officer of the Strategic Missile Forces) said that the railway basing is much more efficient than the automobile and mine ones, since The entire network of the Russian railway has a 100% geographical coverage, in contrast to the automobile version, which can only start from certain points, but on the way of "armored trains of the 21st century" there are some kind of agreements with the United States concluded under Gorbachev.
    1. Odessa
      +1
      December 1 2011
      The main reason for the removal of the BZHRK from the thief is the Americans. It was they who insisted on this. For example, reduce nuclear submarines, winged and mobile ICBMs as you like, and BZHRK first and foremost, despite the fact that there is no direct agreement on BZHRK under the agreement .Well, "we went to meet the wishes of the workers" - they cut it down.
  18. Sirob1996
    0
    December 2 2011
    I OFFER TO RENAME THE POPLAR TO HRENODER
  19. +1
    March 8 2012
    If I am not mistaken, in January we introduced the third regiment

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"