Military Review

Flexible strategic fist

94
Flexible strategic fist



The evening of November 14 nuclear ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), "Vladimir Monomakh" project 955 "Borey" development of CDB ME "Rubin" from the depths of the White Sea has made the launch of two intercontinental ballistic missile "Bulava-30" (3M30 or PCM-56 - on classification of the Treaty on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms), created by the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering (MIT), at the Kura test site in Kamchatka.

STRENGTHENING THE MEASL

The tumultuous recent events: the war against the “Islamic State” banned in Russia, the death of a Russian passenger plane in the sky over the Sinai, the terrorist attack in Paris - turned a significant share of attention to the problems associated with curbing international terrorism. However, the external situation around Russia is not rosy either. Therefore, our country has to pay a lot of attention to maintaining the combat readiness of the Armed Forces, and above all - their strategic component. This circumstance was indicated by Russian President Vladimir Putin during a series of November meetings in Sochi, where issues of increasing the state’s defense capability were discussed. Of particular concern is the continued construction by the United States and its allies of a global missile defense system. “We have repeatedly pointed out that such actions are regarded as an attempt to undermine the existing parity in the field of nuclear weapons, and in fact to undermine the entire system of regional and global stability,” said the head of state and commander-in-chief. That is why, according to him, Russia is forced to respond to the challenges of the times.


The emblem of SSBN "Vladimir Monomakh".

For the first time, a salvo launch of the Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missile launcher from the Vladimir Monomakh SSBN is one of the elements for practicing actions to overcome the missile defense system. Recall that each "Mace" carries up to ten nuclear warheads of individual guidance with the possibility of maneuvering yaw and pitch. It uses the principle of "bunch of grapes", that is, the warheads simultaneously attack several targets. Integrated countermeasures against missile defense also include a flat flight path and the ability to counter electronic suppression.

“Vladimir Monomakh”, which last year joined the Russian Navy, after a successful salvo firing, the Bulava will now replenish the number of nuclear-powered submarines of the Naval Strategic Nuclear Forces (NSNF) of Russia. They include other important events.

On September 30 this year, the Alexander Nevsky submarine - the first production boat of the Borey type - under the command of Captain 1st Rank Vasily Tankovid, arrived at its permanent base - Vilyuchinsk in Kamchatka. SSBN made an inter-naval transition from the North fleet to the Pacific, breaking 4500 miles under arctic waters. Next year, Vladimir Monomakh will also come there. Thus, there will be a phased replacement of the Pacific squad project 667BDR Kalmar built in the early 80s of the last century. In the meantime, Vilyuchinsk continues to improve the infrastructure for the basing of new generation nuclear powered ships.

October 15, after more than two months of autonomous navigation in the Arctic, returned to the Yadi Dolgoruky base in Gadzhiyevo SSBN under the command of captain 1 rank Vladimir Shirina. It was the first combat service of the lead strategic nuclear-powered icebreaker of the fourth generation 955 project in the Arctic Ocean. As the Northern Fleet Commander, Admiral Vladimir Korolev, stated during the meeting of the NS, “the crew of Yuri Dolgoruky once again confirmed that the Russian Navy has the most modern nuclear-powered missile carriers capable of performing the tasks of strategic nuclear deterrence in the World Ocean, including Arctic ice.


SSBN "Vladimir Monomakh".

QUARTET FOR CHANGE TRIO

October 30, another important event took place, which remained as if in the shadow of the mass of others News. On this day, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation conducted a routine audit of the Armed Forces command and control system. It, in fact, has become a fleeting training of the nuclear triad and not only it. The exercises were attended by formations and units of the Strategic Missile Forces, the Northern and Pacific Fleets, the Caspian Flotilla, as well as the Far aviation and ground forces. “During the training, the reliability of passing combat training orders and signals across the entire control vertical from the National Center for Defense Management of the Russian Federation to command posts of formations and military units inclusive was checked,” the Ministry of Defense said in a statement.


The Alexander Nevsky SSBF arrived in Vilyuchinsk.

During a training session of the Strategic Missile Forces, the Topol intercontinental ballistic missile was launched from the Plesetsk cosmodrome. A strategic nuclear submarine “Bryansk” of the project 667BDRM “Dolphin” fired an R-29RMU2 “Sineva” submarine from the Barents Sea. A SSNS "Podolsk" project XNUMBBDR struck the SLBM P-667Р from the depths of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.


Submariners love to joke.

In turn, strategic supersonic long-range aviation bombers Tu-160 launched cruise missiles at targets at the Pemboi ranges in the Komi Republic and Kura in Kamchatka. At the Kapustin Yar test site, the calculation of the launcher of the Iskander operational-tactical complex entered into business. Judging from the video distributed by the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, it was Iskander-K with cruise missiles developed by the Novator Design Bureau, which is part of Concern VKO Almaz - Antey. The range of destruction of targets by these high-precision and unobtrusive means is up to 500 km.


SSBN "Yuri Dolgoruky" returns to base after combat service in the Arctic.

Finally, from the Caspian Sea, the crew of the small rocket ship Velikiy Ustyug fired at the designated target with a Caliber-NK cruise missile. “As you know,” said Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu at a conference call following a training session, “this complex of high-precision weapons Long-range has already shown its combat capabilities in the course of a massive strike on the infrastructure of the militants of the Islamic State in Syria. ” As the head of the Russian defense department emphasized, “on the whole, the results of the training showed high combat readiness of the strategic nuclear forces and high-precision long-range weapons complexes - all the designated targets were hit with the established accuracy”.


The SSBN of the 667BDRM project is still the basis of the Russian NSNF.

The October 30 exercises, first, confirmed the high coherence of all components of the strategic nuclear triad. Secondly, they demonstrated flexibility in cooperation with non-nuclear strategic deterrence devices, which were represented by the Iskander-K and Kaliber-NK cruise missiles. Thirdly, today we can say that the strategic trio of the Russian Armed Forces has been transformed into a quartet, which not only expands the range of use of deterrents, but also allows using them in different combinations, depending on the situation and situation, and if necessary all together. And, of course, high-precision cruise missiles, again, if necessary, can be equipped with nuclear warheads.

Today, strategic forces are also being used to combat the Islamic State Islamic Organization (IG), which is banned in Russia. Since November 17, Long-Range Aviation with the participation of Tu-22М3, Tu-160 and Tu-95MS airplanes are delivering massive bombing and rocket attacks on headquarters, training camps, warehouses and infrastructure facilities of gangs in Syria. In the video plots of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation there are shots showing the latest X-101 cruise missiles developed by the Raduga GosMCB, which is part of the Tactical Missile Weapons Concern. These cruise missiles of length 7,45 m and warheads weighing 400 kg fly at subsonic speeds, but they are extremely difficult to detect. The rocket's fuselage is made using low-visibility stealth technology, and it moves to a target at low altitude, which does not allow the radar to detect it in a timely manner. X-101 is designed to hit objects at a distance of 5500 km. There is also an option with a nuclear warhead power 250 kilotons. Its designation is X-102. “Unobtrusive and capable of flying without getting into the radar detection zone, the X-101 is especially suited for the so-called sudden first strike, especially when striking well-protected targets,” writes the American magazine Popular Mechanics. Thus, the publication emphasizes, "The Bear" shows its newest claws ". “Bear” means not only Russia, whose symbol has become this beast, but specifically the Tu-95 bomber, which in the West is designated as “Bear” (“Bear”). But the X-101 / X-102 carriers are not only Tu-95 bombers, which deliver eight such missiles to the launch site, but also Tu-22М3, raising four missiles each. And Tu-160 bomb-compartments accept twelve X-101 / X-102 altogether.


Launch of the Sinev SLBM.

The combined massive strike on the IG objects was carried out on 20 November, when special-purpose aviation flight crews based on the Syrian Hmeimim airfield attacked the targets held by the Islamic State gangs, almost simultaneously with the Long-Range Aviation and 18 airplanes of the “Calib“ Calib “Calib“ Calibrated ”. launched from the ships of the Caspian Flotilla, on seven sites in the provinces of Rakka, Idlib and Aleppo. They were all amazed.

ABOUT "AMAZING THINGS"


In the evening of November 7, flickering green-blue light lit up the dark sky over Los Angeles. In the largest California metropolis panic began. Someone thought it was a falling meteorite, others took the unusual phenomenon as a UFO, and finally, others thought about the beginning of a nuclear war. The local airport in connection with the inexplicable situation even stopped the takeoffs and landings of aircraft. But everyone was wrong. This, it turns out, was amused by the Pentagon, more precisely demonstrated the American military might of Russia, China and its own citizens. The Kentucky nuclear-powered missile submarine (SSBN 737) launched the Trident II D-5 SLBM from the Pacific Ocean adjacent to Los Angeles. This was not done by chance.

Just at this time, US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter gave a speech at a military-political conference at the Ronald Reagan Memorial Library in Simi Valley California, California - actually a suburb of Los Angeles. He accused Russia of “endangering the world order”. According to the associate of the American news agency Associated Press, Robert Barnes, this speech of the Pentagon chief was "the toughest attack on the former American rival in the Cold War."


Supersonic strategic bomber Tu-160.

If you follow the logic of Ashton Carter, then all the evil in the modern world comes from two sources - Russia and China. "Of course, neither Russia nor China can change this order (by which the leadership of the United States is meant - author's note), but both countries challenge it," said the Pentagon chief. That is why "we (that is, the United States - author's note) are investing in technologies that are most important for countering Russian provocations, such as new unmanned systems, new long-range bombers, and innovative technologies, including electromagnetic rail guns, lasers and new systems for waging electronic war, among which there are so amazing things that I cannot even tell about them here. ”

The head of the US military did not specify what these “amazing things” are, but I think he was unpleasantly surprised when, three days later, he heard from television news about a new surprise for “insidious Russians”. And that's what happened. The report dealt with the second day of the meeting in Sochi under the chairmanship of President Vladimir Putin, at which issues of strengthening the stability of strategic forces were discussed. “We have repeatedly said that Russia will take the necessary response to strengthen the potential of strategic nuclear forces,” said the Russian leader, anticipating the discussion. “We will work on missile defense systems, but at the first stage, as we have repeatedly, I repeat, we said, we will work on attack systems that are able to overcome any missile defense systems.” “Over the past three years, defense industry enterprises have created and successfully tested a number of promising weapon systems that are capable of solving combat missions in a layered defense system,” he said. “Such systems have already begun to enter the army this year.” And just here the page of the presentation booklet, which was lying on the table in front of one of the participants in the Sochi meeting, got into the camera lens.

And it showed elements of a new type of naval strategic weapon - the ocean multi-purpose system “Status-6”. It is intended, as is clear from the booklet, to destroy “important objects of the enemy’s economy near the coast and cause guaranteed unacceptable damage to the territory of the country by creating zones of extensive radioactive contamination unsuitable for military, economic and other activities in these zones for a long time ".


Launch of the Kalibr-NK cruise missile with the Velikiy Ustyug MRK.

The main components of the system are self-propelled underwater vehicles (SPA), equipped with compact nuclear power plants (probably of direct-flow water-vapor type), capable of delivering cobalt nuclear charges with a power of 100 megatons (Mt) to the enemy’s coast, which is at a distance of 6200 miles (10000 km ). The underwater projectile moves to the target at a speed of 100 nodes, that is, 185 km / h. The depth of his stroke can reach 1000 meters. In other words, it is impossible to intercept a SPA with currently available PLO weapons. It is also almost impossible to detect because the engine noise is shifted to high frequencies, which will not allow existing sonar stations to detect them in a timely manner.


Launcher of the Iskander-K complex.

What is a cobalt nuclear warhead with a power of 100 MT? The most powerful thermonuclear bomb AN602, later called "Tsar Bomb" dropped from a Tu-95V commanded by Major Andrew Durnovtseva 30 1961 October, the above ground "Dry Nose" in the New Earth, had the power 57-58,6 Mt of TNT . After the explosion at an altitude of 3700-4200 m (different numbers here refer to sources), a fireball was formed with a radius of 4,6 km, the mushroom cloud rose to an altitude of 67 km, its diameter reached 95 km, and the seismic wave went round the Earth three times.


Cruise missile X-101 out of the Tu-160 bomb bay.

It is worth noting that the capacity of AN602, created by a team led by three times Hero of Socialist Labor Academician Andrei Sakharov, was almost halved, as there were concerns about the extremely high level of radioactive contamination that it should have caused. The fact is that the "Tsar-bomb" originally had a three-stage structure. The first stage with a power of 1,5 Mt “launched” the second stage thermonuclear reaction (50 Mt), and she, in turn, initiated the nuclear “Jekyll-Hyde reaction” in the third stage with a power of 50 Mt. Undermining this third stage would have caused the strongest radiation and radioactive contamination. As the American magazine The National Interest points out in this connection, if such a bomb had been detonated in Los Angeles, then “within a radius of five miles from the epicenter, all those who did not die from the blast wave and heat would receive a lethal dose of hard radiation - 500 rem An 20 mile radius would cause an explosion to gut all buildings, including reinforced concrete structures. In short, the Tsar Bomb would have completely devastated Los Angeles with all the suburbs. ” And AN602 itself, exploded on Novaya Zemlya, turned out to be very “clean”. In the epicenter of the explosion, the testers were able to appear within two hours after the monstrous firestorm swept over the ground.


US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter believes that Russia and China "endanger the world order." And the United States is called upon to stop them.


HELL. Sakharov proposed the use of cobalt-238 cobalt-59 instead of uranium-60 in shells of thermonuclear ammunition. After the explosion of such warheads, an intense and long-lasting cobalt-510 isotope radiation field is formed. The first to describe the effect of a cobalt bomb, an American physicist of Hungarian origin, Leo Szilard, called this weapon the “Doomsday Machine”, because, according to scientists, only 60 and Cobalt-XNUMX are enough to stop life on Earth.

"Torpeda SAKHAROVA"


From the page of the presentation booklet it is not clear how the Status-6 self-propelled underwater vehicles will operate. Some experts say that these are giant torpedoes of caliber 1,6 m, designed to literally torpedo the state of the enemy, or rather its areas adjacent to the coast. This is enough for the country to cease to exist. After all, for example, 75-80% of the industrial potential of the United States falls on coastal areas. Most of the population lives there.

The Sakharov torpedo is also remembered in this connection. At the initiative of this scientist in the USSR at the end of 40-s - the beginning of 60-s of the last century in the Scientific Research Institute-400 under the guidance of N.N. Shamarin was developing an unusual torpedoes T-15. Its caliber is 1,5 m, length is 24 m, mass is about 40 t. It had to carry a cobalt thermonuclear charge with a power of about 100 megatons. That is, a number of parameters of the Sakharov torpedo are close to those intended to be achieved at the SPA. However, its stroke range was approximately 30 km. To deliver the torpedo to the site of the attack, work was carried out on the first national nuclear submarine of the 627 project. When the sailors became acquainted with the ideology of this weapon, they decisively rejected it. After all, in order to get close to the American coast, it was necessary to overcome powerful anti-submarine frontiers. And this seemed impossible, because in those days the US Navy had absolute superiority in the seas and oceans. Even if T-15 were able to fire, it was highly likely that it would be destroyed by depth charges.


AN602 explosion at the Dry Nose testing range 30 October 1961

But, probably, even this circumstance would not have stopped Sakharov’s project. “The hull of such a torpedo can be made very durable; mines and barrage nets are not afraid of it,” AD wrote in his memoirs. Sakharov. “Of course, the destruction of the ports, both with a surface explosion of a torpedo with a 100 megaton charge that jumped out of the water, and an underwater explosion, is inevitably associated with very large human casualties.” But everything was spoiled by the “Tsar Bomb”, or rather its weight and size characteristics. Indeed, in those days there were no technologies of high-power and at the same time compact thermonuclear warheads. The bomb weighed 26,6 T. The charge did not fit not only in the T-15, but also in a very rather big Tu-95 bomber. He transported AN602 to the dumping site at the Sukhoi Nos launch site with an open bomb bay as the ammunition simply did not fit in its womb.

As a result, the project turned. And because of the impossibility of its implementation, and in connection with the emergence of new carriers of nuclear weapons - intercontinental ballistic missiles. The K-3 - the head submarine of the 627 project, later called the Leninsky Komsomol, was completed as a torpedo.


The layout of the "Tsar-bomb" AN602.

"SPILIT" - "SKIF" - "STATUS-6"

However, let us return to the self-propelled underwater vehicle of the ocean multi-purpose system “Status-6”. Actually, this SPA was known for a long time. Work on the topic of research and development “Spilit” was quite successfully carried out by the Makeyev State Rocket Center together with Leningrad underwater shipbuilding “Rubin” design bureaus in 1988-1990 in Soviet times. After the collapse of the USSR, activity in this area slowed down, but was not stopped. Already at the dawn of the post-Soviet era - at the beginning of the 1990-s, the SRC Makeev began the full-scale development of the ROC Skif commissioned by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. A little later, the head organization for the creation of the product and the Skif complex was identified by the Rubin Central Design Bureau. Somewhere around 2008, the production of prototypes of the product began. And in the autumn of the same year, the tests of the first prototypes of the new weapons started.


Academician Andrei Sakharov was the ideologue and creator of the most powerful thermonuclear weapons.

Year by year they intensified. As it appears from the presentation booklet, an experimental diesel-electric submarine B-90 “Sarov” (the name of this submarine suggests that the Russian Federal Nuclear Center’s Sarov’s Russian Federal Nuclear Center’s 20120 project, the rescue the towing ship "Zvezdochka" of the 20180 project developed by the Almaz Central Marine Design Bureau and the non-self-propelled floating test complex (PIK) of the 20210 project. All of them are capable of launching new underwater weapons. However, asterisk and PIK are engaged in lifting the product after testing on the surface. In the bow of the diesel-electric submarine Sarov there is a torpedo apparatus-launcher of a large caliber of the original design. It is through him that Skif Spa is fired.

In connection with the above, some media claim that the status-6 is a kind of bluff, with the help of which Russia wants to “take on the bluff” of the West and, above all, the United States, are surprising. No, the product completes the test cycle and will appear to be ready for deployment by 2019-2023. As its carriers, it is supposed to use, as is clear from the same booklet, nuclear submarines of special purpose Belgorod of the 09852 project and Khabarovsk of the 09851 project currently under construction on Sevmash.


A torpedo tube with a single T-15 occupied more than a quarter of the length of the submarine hull of the 627 project.

Still, there is a lot of ambiguity with Status 6. In May, 2013 was discussed in the Russian media as to how Skif would hit enemy territory. At that time, it was suggested that the SPA could for a long time be in standby mode on the sea or ocean floor off the coast of the enemy, and then on command from the ultra-low-frequency ZEVS transmitter operating on super-long waves capable of passing through water and land, hit targets. In other words, a spa is a kind of self-propelled mine that explodes at a signal. A version was also expressed that the Skiff was an uninhabited underwater vehicle, transporting to the launch site a ballistic or cruise missile attacking a coastal target from a pistol distance when the anti-aircraft defense systems could no longer intercept it. This option is also possible. Let's not forget that the “Status-6” is called the ocean multi-purpose system, that is, it is designed to perform different tasks.


Layout of Skif Spa before loading onto the carrier vessel.

In September of this year, a wave of publications swept through foreign media, initiated by an article by Bill Hertz in The Washington Free Beacon and The Washington Times about the new Russian underwater weapons, which received the code name Kanyon in the Pentagon, which means our Skiff. They noted that Kanyon does not fit into the Russian-US agreements on strategic nuclear weapons and therefore there are no restrictions on its deployment, and the system itself is "another example of Russia's aggressive and innovative approach to the development of military potential." It was also noted, with reference to representatives of American intelligence, that such a torpedo was "impossible to intercept." In this connection, the statement by some Russian publications about the creation in the USA of an "unmanned submarine" under the program ACTUV (Anti-Submarine Warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel), which, allegedly, is specially developed to combat SPA, is surprising. But note that the ACTUV is not an uninhabited underwater vehicle, but an unmanaged surface. His task is to conduct hydroacoustic observation in the designated area and to detect, if possible, submarines. And nothing more. Since, for the above reasons, detecting the movement of a high-speed, deep-sea Skif is extremely difficult, if not impossible, then the ACTUV will be as useful as a fly swatter when hunting an elephant to fight SPA.


Experimental diesel-electric submarines B-90 “Sarov” of the 20120 project is intended for testing SPA.


The XTNUMX Zvezdochka rescue tugboat provides SPA testing.

Invulnerability and all the crushing power of the Status-6 cause in the West quite understandable fear and horror. The ocean multipurpose system is often called an “anti-humane” weapon, as if a weapon is humane. Yes, this is the “Doomsday Machine”, when all other means in the war will be exhausted or will not bring a deterrent effect. Of course, these weapons can be the subject of discussion in negotiations with Western countries, subject to their refusal to deploy a global and regional missile defense system.


Screenshot of the report on the meeting in Sochi. Seen a fragment of the presentation booklet on the "Status-6".
Author:
Originator:
http://www.nationaldefense.ru/includes/periodics/armedforces/2015/1214/145317358/detail.shtml
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Megatron
    Megatron 10 January 2016 07: 21 New
    33
    No concessions to adversaries, all concessions that we made to the Westerners - in the end they were used against us!
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 10 January 2016 07: 35 New
      11
      Quote: Megatron
      No concessions to adversaries, all concessions that we made to the Westerners - in the end they were used against us!

      Where did you see in the article something about concessions? Or did it so excited you: "weapons can be a subject of discussion in negotiations with Western countries, provided they refuse to deploy a global and regional missile defense system."
      The American missile defense system really poses a serious threat to Russia's security. Therefore, its ban is a blessing for our country. And if such a ban is achieved, including with the help of "Status-6", it is doubly good. The costs of developing and manufacturing the US global missile defense system and our local oceanic multipurpose system are incomparable.
      1. subbtin.725
        subbtin.725 10 January 2016 07: 58 New
        +3
        Yes, this is Doomsday Machine, when all other means in the war will be exhausted or will not bring a deterrent effect. Of course, these weapons can be discussed at negotiations with Western countries, provided they refuse to deploy a global and regional missile defense system.

        Of course, this will be a weighty argument in negotiations with our sworn friends. And these negotiations are just around the corner, because it is not for nothing that the GDP spoke about the red lines.
      2. Megatron
        Megatron 11 January 2016 08: 07 New
        0
        Nothing will stop them .... except for the new deployment of missiles in Cuba.
      3. leon1204id
        leon1204id 12 January 2016 20: 37 New
        0
        Yes, the Pentagon already intends to "respond" to the possible (or imaginary) threat of "Status-6". And do not hope that they will come to us with flowers and good intentions. laughing
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 10 January 2016 08: 23 New
      +2
      And it depicted the elements of a new type of naval strategic weapon - the ocean-based multi-purpose system “Status-6”.
      it’s not clear whether it’s a myth or a true story ... what
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 10 January 2016 09: 57 New
        0
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        it’s not clear whether it’s a myth or a true story

        A fertile topic - everything is secrecy, at least fantasize I do not want the name, just do not confuse ...)))
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 10 January 2016 11: 44 New
        +1
        This torpedo will definitely not have a cobalt warhead, in the form of a third stage, because when this torpedo explodes under water, a huge "nuclear sultan" is formed, in which all the decay products will remain, this will cause strong radioactive contamination, mainly of the Atlantic or Pacific oceans, depending on where it is used, and the minimum of the US coast, the resulting tsunami will wash away all the surrounding areas to an explosion, but this radioactive water will return back to the ocean.
        1. Mooh
          Mooh 11 January 2016 21: 15 New
          0
          The cobalt warhead, in the form of a third stage in this torpedo, will definitely not

          And why did you decide that the explosion is underwater? Everything is not so clear smile
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS 10 January 2016 16: 07 New
        +4
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        it’s not clear whether it’s a myth or a true story ...

        There is an opinion that the carrier of the Status-6 will be the Belgorod nuclear submarine (project 649). There are many ambiguities with the construction of this submarine, as well as no less vultures, which raises many questions. But it’s good, because the less the adversary knows, the will sleep better.
        The very idea of ​​Status-6 is not bad, because this project (if implemented) will be, in my opinion, the most reinforced concrete deterrent for any adversary.
        And along with the above questions, there is one more ... If there is a Status-6 project, what is Status-1/2/3/4/5? And is there Status-7, etc. ...?
        1. Dembel77
          Dembel77 11 January 2016 20: 41 New
          +1
          So what are you-the asymmetric response of Russia! good
        2. avia1991
          avia1991 11 January 2016 21: 10 New
          0
          Quote: NEXUS
          If there is a draft Status-6, what is Status-1/2/3/4/5? And is there a Status-7, etc. ...?

          So maybe "6" is the estimated number of PL carriers? what Or the warheads themselves .. however, 6 warheads will not be enough to guarantee the drowning of America wassat
    3. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 12 January 2016 00: 26 New
      0
      Yes, this is Doomsday Machine, when all other means in the war will be exhausted or will not bring a deterrent effect.

      And right !!! good In the fight against Western demagogues, with their democracy and a policy of double standards, all means are good!
      This idea would be brought to the successful completion of the tests and would have collected a dozen, another!
      Further, if she will act like that
      Then it was suggested that the SPA could be in standby mode for a long time on the sea or ocean floor off the coast of the enemy, and then, on command from the ZEVS ultra-low-frequency transmitter operating on extra-long waves capable of passing through water and land, could hit targets. In other words, the SPA is a kind of self-propelled mine exploding upon a signal.

      Then connect it to the "Perimeter" or "Dead Hand" and then let the States invent anything, but they know that they will have to hide from these systems only on the Moon!
  2. Olfred
    Olfred 10 January 2016 07: 25 New
    +3
    "innovative technologies, including electromagnetic rail guns, lasers and new systems for waging electronic warfare, among which there are so amazing things that I can’t even talk about them here."
    just like "Alice in Wonderland" ... wink hi
  3. yuriy55
    yuriy55 10 January 2016 07: 34 New
    +3
    Thanks for the summary. It’s a natural state of affairs, even when one’s own people should not be aware of the latest developments, but there should be confidence in their own defense and protection of the interests of the state! good
  4. tlauicol
    tlauicol 10 January 2016 07: 36 New
    +1
    Mace in November one missed, but still they report "salvo launch"
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 10 January 2016 08: 25 New
      +5
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Mace in November one missed, but still they report "salvo launch"

      "missed" and "start" are different things ... no?
      1. tlauicol
        tlauicol 10 January 2016 08: 49 New
        -14
        it's hard to scare the enemy that our rockets have learned to take off
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 10 January 2016 09: 29 New
          +6
          Quote: Tlauicol
          it's hard to scare the enemy that our rockets have learned to take off


          What is meant?

          Firstly, nothing difficult - they were scared for a long time, especially in October 1957, when the USSR launched the first satellite

          And then they got scared more than once, with the advent of new missiles. How their "Satan" scared you can not remind.

          Now the emergence of new missiles - "Bulava", "X-101", "Iskander", "Caliber", S-400, S-500 .....
          also scares no less.

          Or not?
          1. tlauicol
            tlauicol 10 January 2016 09: 53 New
            -6
            if 24 out of 10 strategic missiles hits the target, (+ launch of the layout) .. somehow it’s uncomfortable for our future
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 10 January 2016 11: 14 New
              +3
              Quote: Tlauicol
              if 24 out of 10 strategic missiles hits the target, (+ launch of the layout) .. somehow it’s uncomfortable for our future


              Why are we uncomfortable?

              It’s uncomfortable for those who will / will not fall


            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. avia1991
              avia1991 10 January 2016 13: 58 New
              +2
              Quote: Tlauicol
              if out of 24 strategic missiles, 10 hits the target

              Indelicate question: Are you sitting in the General Staff of the Navy? Or at the training ground, with a net, catch warheads?
              If not both, you can keep your "we know, swam" as a keepsake! There is no need to puff up here, trying to show your "information".
              And if the first or the second - then your place is behind bars! "For disclosure" .. and so on. wassat
              1. kavad
                kavad 10 January 2016 16: 57 New
                -7
                Man, you're burning! He asked the question himself - he froze.
                Are you sitting in the General Staff of the Navy? Or at the training ground, with a net, catch warheads?
                - i.e. you just sat in the General Staff ?! Well, or at the landfill with a net ?!

                And if the first or the second - then your place is behind bars! "For disclosure"
                - Are you scribbling from the message area ?! For the disclosure of top-secret information?

                Or not? Well, then
                No need to puff here
                !
                1. avia1991
                  avia1991 10 January 2016 17: 59 New
                  +5
                  Quote: kavad
                  Man, you're burning!

                  Would YOU learn courtesy to begin with? "Poke" has not matured yet.
                  Quote: kavad
                  were you just in the General Staff building?

                  Where do I write it? The statement given by the opponent, not confirmed by anything other than his words - idle talk. This is the case, if a simple reading does not reach hi
                  Quote: kavad
                  Scribble from the message area ?!

                  You would have decided, Sasha, where do you think? And then, it seems, he himself got confused, and you bring down others.
                  Quote: kavad
                  Or not? Well, then
                  and then do not try to engage in verbiage: there is something to argue in support - say, no - do not get into someone else's conversation.
                  1. avia1991
                    avia1991 10 January 2016 19: 08 New
                    0
                    On the "have something to say":
                    I would like to see the arguments live. What I found myself indicates 16 successful launches, incl. the latter is partially:
                    http://politrussia.com/vooruzhennye-sily/bulava-zhivee-vsekh-zhivykh-673/
                    http://vpk.name/news/97822_bulava_vrozhdennyie_defektyi.html
                    http://gruzdoff.ru/wiki/Булава_(ракета)
                    etc.
                  2. kavad
                    kavad 11 January 2016 14: 00 New
                    -1
                    Oh yo-yo! Well, and YOU have grown so mean, Seryozhenka ?!
            4. Zefr
              Zefr 12 January 2016 22: 33 New
              0
              For example, in Los Angeles, it is enough to destroy the system of extraction and supply of water. And the city will die. Need 1 warhead.
        2. Tektor
          Tektor 10 January 2016 11: 39 New
          +4
          As far as it came to me, the second Mace missed precisely because of the volley launch: it was damaged when leaving the mine due to insufficient stabilization of the boat from the start of the previous one. New information is always helpful. You can increase the interval between starts or improve the stabilization system.
      2. mvg
        mvg 10 January 2016 19: 30 New
        -7
        terminology .. and the point is that the first of 16 will fly? at the same time, the rest will most likely drown the boat .. after all, the second one "missed" due to the fact that the stabilization system worked incorrectly, when the "weight" of the submarine changed .. the video shows that the second one was already "clumsily" coming out of the water ..
        how many years are brought, and the horse is still there ..
        and the tridents, one and a half hundred launches without emergency
    2. Moore
      Moore 10 January 2016 08: 55 New
      0
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Mace in November one missed, but still they report "salvo launch"

      ... According to confirmed data from objective control, warheads missiles successfully arrived at the Kura training ground in Kamchatka, ”noted the military department.
      http://www.topnews.ru/news_id_84039.html
      Whom to believe?
    3. orthodox71
      orthodox71 10 January 2016 09: 48 New
      +3
      The main thing is that it takes off, and it’ll get to the continent, it is not required to fly into the window
  5. Nik_One
    Nik_One 10 January 2016 07: 43 New
    +7
    It is worth noting that the power of AN602 was almost halved, because there were concerns about the extremely high level of radioactive contamination that it should have caused.

    Not quite right. The power of the bomb was reduced, because with a 100 Mt explosion, the crew of the Tu-95 bomber would most likely not have returned from the mission.
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 10 January 2016 08: 05 New
      +5
      Quote: Nik_One
      The power of the bomb was reduced because ...


      There are other versions:
      (In fact, the Tsar Bomb was designed for a 100-megaton equivalent; the planned explosion power was cut in half, according to Khrushchev, “In order not to break all the glasses in Moscow”). With this test, the Soviet Union demonstrated the ability to create a hydrogen bomb of any power and means of delivering a bomb to a detonation point.


      can be read here:
      https://otvet.mail.ru/question/21504410

      But in reality, scientists have proposed limiting the capacity due to the unpredictability of the consequences ... what
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 10 January 2016 11: 52 New
        0
        They simply removed the shell of uranium 238, in view of the very strong contamination with decay products, the bomb itself was three-stage - "a hydrogen bomb in a hydrogen bomb" and if a shell of uranium 238 were added, then this bomb was already four-stage in design.
      2. avia1991
        avia1991 11 January 2016 21: 16 New
        0
        Quote: yuriy55
        But in reality, scientists have proposed limiting the power due to the unpredictability of the consequences.

        ..at least Sakharov himself explained exactly this by the decrease in power. hi
  6. rassel0889
    rassel0889 10 January 2016 07: 48 New
    +8
    I read it to half, with very great pride in our aircraft. But then insight came, and pride gave way to fear. Fear of where our beautiful world is heading ... There was a feeling that he (our world) was infected with a terrible disease called a man, this disease is progressing, and will inevitably lead to the death of planet Earth, which created us ... straightforward pun but not at all funny. And the same person argues about this ...
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 10 January 2016 07: 52 New
      +1
      Quote: rassel0889
      ... the world has contracted a terrible disease called a man, this disease is progressing ...


      From the source:
      1. rassel0889
        rassel0889 10 January 2016 08: 22 New
        +1
        This is the number)) I honestly didn’t even think about the film when I wrote! the subconscious mind is a powerful thing, it gives out pre-heard phrases, do not let the mind understand where this pun came from !!

        PYSYA In place of the claim of reason, I too would besiege humanity in its rapid self-destruction. Fiction has always been relevant decades after the release on the screens and shelves of boutiques.
        Already we live in a matrix, only built in real life, and not in that same subconscious.
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 10 January 2016 08: 28 New
      0
      Quote: rassel0889
      where our beautiful world is heading ... There was a feeling that he (our world) was infected with a terrible disease called a man, this disease is progressing, and will inevitably lead to the death of planet Earth, which created us ..

      whoo! The Moment will come, and the Earth will shake off, like a flea dog ... and it will be right, we humans, Enemies of the Planet and all living things.
  7. Same lech
    Same lech 10 January 2016 08: 04 New
    +2
    RUSSIA has all the resources and opportunities to erase the US dust ... it pleases me US officials it saddens ... a positive effect has a beneficial effect on the nervous system.
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 10 January 2016 10: 14 New
      +2
      Fine. If only in Russia, the standard of living would rise to the level of the United States. This is what would really please me.
      1. PHANTOM-AS
        PHANTOM-AS 10 January 2016 18: 06 New
        0
        When the standard of living of those in power ceased to be directly dependent on the will of the people (plebs in their past), that's exactly from that moment we became slaves ..., slaves (hostages) of the system that built itself super-communism, having accumulated income in hands, and shifting the costs to slaves.
        I remember in the Primer it was: "We are not slaves, we are not slaves", heh, now the slaves are dumb doubts? Or is this, the money-grubbing idea of ​​"jackpot" fiddling with the pancreas of the majority of the population?
        curious however experiment fellow
        None of the governments in the world have ever managed to indulge their own people for so long request
    2. mav1971
      mav1971 10 January 2016 17: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: The same Lech
      RUSSIA has all the resources and opportunities to erase the US dust ... it pleases me US officials it saddens ... a positive effect has a beneficial effect on the nervous system.

      Lech! Do you know that even England and France and China, not to mention America, have the resources and the ability to dust Russia?
      Does it affect your nervous system?

      Moreover, for all of us, only half an hour is enough to end our life in a completely different way from what our parents would like. children, and yourself.
      and everything that I would do in my life, all your plans — repairing an apartment, a daughter at the institute, planting apple trees in a summer cottage — all this could be crossed out by some John, Michelle, Lee, or Sergey.
      Think before you revel in the "may" ...
      1. n.kolesnichenko
        n.kolesnichenko 11 January 2016 18: 43 New
        0
        But this is unlikely! This is troublesome ....
  8. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 10 January 2016 08: 05 New
    +2
    “Status-6” is actually not a classic torpedo, but a 100% robotic, currently the fastest in the world deep-sea submarine of miniature size and with innovative stealth technologies.

    Endorsed good
  9. Shark Lover
    Shark Lover 10 January 2016 08: 14 New
    0
    Someone can say when the nuclear submarine is on alert, is it fully loaded with nuclear weapons? Strategists fly without, and nuclear submarines?
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 10 January 2016 08: 29 New
      0
      Quote: Shark Lover
      Someone can say when the nuclear submarine is on alert, is it fully loaded with nuclear weapons? Strategists fly without, and nuclear submarines?

      Are you interested in the General Staff? wassat
    2. orthodox71
      orthodox71 10 January 2016 10: 07 New
      +1
      We have two torpedoes loaded with apples, the rest are ordinary, dmb 92, dpl pr.641
    3. mvg
      mvg 10 January 2016 19: 41 New
      0
      Of course, they go around with blanks, what are you, apaldels .. to shove 200 sailors into the reactor, but for six months !!! when the war begins, they "blow" at full steam to the base, there they load "with a margin" and go to war! kill foes !!!! and, if, practice shooting? than to shoot then? immediately fighting? with YABCH. And if it doesn't reach the Kura? Or even in the direction of Japan will go ..
      Well, you ask questions.
      1. n.kolesnichenko
        n.kolesnichenko 11 January 2016 18: 46 New
        0
        No need to write nonsense !!! If only you would have thought before you write !!! A nuclear engine on a boat is normal, and a nuclear warhead is a "reactor"?
  10. azbukin77
    azbukin77 10 January 2016 08: 17 New
    +1
    This disease is called S.A.A., this infection has infected more than half the world and continues to agonize !!! How many troubles and blood of an innocent shed every day and all this is S.A. So either we are them, or they are us (which I strongly doubt).
    1. rassel0889
      rassel0889 10 January 2016 08: 24 New
      +1
      You don’t need 300 million people to condemn a handful of rich people in actions ... the USA has nothing to do with it. This is just a tool.
  11. pas682010
    pas682010 10 January 2016 08: 21 New
    +2
    The presence of so many "gifts" for NATO pleases! There is something to go to Uncle Sam on the tinsel!
  12. s.melioxin
    s.melioxin 10 January 2016 08: 24 New
    +1
    The turbulent recent events: the war against the Islamic State banned in Russia, the death of the Russian Boeing in the skies over the Sinai, and the terrorist attack in Paris - have switched a significant share of attention to the problems associated with curbing international terrorism. However, the external situation around Russia is by no means rosy.
    Dark times. Therefore, all these weapons must be acquired and developed. But the enemy also has the same or something similar weapons. And a man only needs nine grams. But the most important thing is that the descendants would not say that then there was a "white strip".
    1. cap
      cap 10 January 2016 16: 55 New
      0
      Quote: s.melioxin
      The turbulent recent events: the war against the Islamic State banned in Russia, the death of the Russian Boeing in the skies over the Sinai, and the terrorist attack in Paris - have switched a significant share of attention to the problems associated with curbing international terrorism. However, the external situation around Russia is by no means rosy.
      Dark times. Therefore, all these weapons must be acquired and developed. But the enemy also has the same or something similar weapons. And a man only needs nine grams. But the most important thing is that the descendants would not say that then there was a "white strip".


      Lesson on tactics. The last century.
      -Comrade Colonel, resolve the question. Kursant Ivanov.
      - Ask.
      -after a nuclear strike against the enemy in the offensive zone, in terms of conventional explosives, it turns out for each defender 50 tons of TNT!
      - cadet Ivanov, do not ask stupid questions. Read the task and put on the map.

      No comments soldier .
  13. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 10 January 2016 09: 13 New
    +3
    Let's go well. "Accidentally" showed "Status-6", let them know what to expect. "To live with wolves, howl like a wolf" and it is not our fault that in Washington they understand only the language of force. After our test of the Tsar Bomba, they immediately became more accommodating and went to sign contracts with us.
    “Of course, neither Russia nor China can change this order (by which is meant the leadership of the United States - author's note), but both of these countries challenge him,” the Pentagon chief said.
    Well, I don’t understand: are they deaf or blind? Yes, we are ALREADY changing. Oh, sorry, we weren't warned. All. There will be no more unipolar world! "I like it, I don't like it, be patient, beauty."
  14. Lumumba
    Lumumba 10 January 2016 09: 18 New
    +2
    Only the availability of weapons of guaranteed and inevitable retaliation, ensuring the almost complete destruction of the industrial potential of the aggressor, keeps the world from sliding into the hot phase of the third world war. I am glad that we are developing such systems. "Perimeter-M", "Status-6", "Object-4202" and many other projects reliably keep the damned imperialists and neo-colonialists from taking wrong steps. All they have to do is to play off the banana republics out of impotence and anger, and also try to pursue a sanctions policy.
  15. 31rus
    31rus 10 January 2016 09: 27 New
    +1
    Dear, two articles "Yantar" and this, on reflection, you come to the conclusion that Russia is creating the structure and the system itself "Status-6", but the scale and its capabilities will not give rest to the United States and other "partners" for a long time, if Russia got down to business, then I'm sure we'll see it through
  16. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 10 January 2016 09: 49 New
    0
    Of course it’s good that we have everything described or will be soon. Bad that us
    pulling into the next arms race, unbearable for our budget.
  17. Flat5160
    Flat5160 10 January 2016 11: 51 New
    +1
    After the United States withdrew from the ABM treaty, we are simply forced to do something that will put everything in its place. So another direction of this kind was lit. And for good reason.
  18. Robert Nevsky
    Robert Nevsky 10 January 2016 12: 40 New
    0
    MY RUSSIA - SUPER POWER !!!!
  19. jovanni
    jovanni 10 January 2016 13: 06 New
    0
    "... The invulnerability and all the overwhelming power of" Status-6 "causes quite understandable fear and horror in the West."

    And it was cool! But we warned you ...
  20. bratchanin
    bratchanin 10 January 2016 14: 14 New
    0
    Only the prospect of the complete destruction of the Anglo-Saxons, can make them try on the defeat.
  21. sa-ag
    sa-ag 10 January 2016 14: 52 New
    0
    and then Australia, South America, and part of Africa in this world, a wonderful new world ...
    1. Former battalion commander
      Former battalion commander 10 January 2016 19: 40 New
      0
      I think there will be a little more:
      1. China.
      2. India.
      3. Indonesia.
      These are the most densely populated countries and no one is going to shoot at them. Well, humanity will start almost from scratch ... Well, that's okay. The next iteration may be smarter ...
      1. mvg
        mvg 10 January 2016 19: 46 New
        -1
        If there is such a "booze", then "cut the last cucumber", why would India and China stay? There will be no ball .. it will come down from orbit ..
        You can blow up your own right at the pier .. We will have our own "plus points" - we will die right away ... and "these" will suffer a little more
  22. Old26
    Old26 10 January 2016 14: 53 New
    +5
    I read the article and honestly, I don’t know how to treat it. Therefore, I did not put anything. No plus or minus. The author, of course, did a great job, but IMHO collected everything that is possible: facts, speculation, draining (though carried out "classically"), plus his opinion. The article turned out.

    Quote: Ami du peuple
    The American missile defense is indeed a serious threat to Russia's security.

    In what? I understand that the easiest way to repeat the statements of the media and political figures intended for internal use, but still, what?

    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    it’s not clear whether it’s a myth or a true story ..

    And you ask yourself a few questions. For instance:
    1. Do we have a direct-flow nuclear reactor in our project (not to mention iron)?
    2. Can it be "shoved" into a XNUMX-meter cylinder?
    3. What will happen to such a torpedo at a depth of 1000 meters?
    4. How natural is the behavior of Colonel General when an operator with a camera becomes his shoulder? And this is when protocol shootings are usually carried out in the frontal plane so that faces are visible, and if shooting is done from behind, then from a sufficiently large distance and not where the military is.
    5. A document of this direction must have the stamp "SS.OV". I came across such a document a couple of times, because it had stamps on every page. And here are ordinary sheets, not even sewn, as it should be for a secret document flow, but compressed by a plastic spring.
    6. Printed document reads "slide 3". Not a page, but a slide. The inscription is in the upper left corner instead of the lower right one, but figs with it, with the left corner. On the next inscription "slide 4" is not. There is also a mention of "Status-4".
    7. And most importantly. The currently existing Shkval submarine missile has a rather peculiar shape with a cavitator on the nose. There is also a classic scheme. And yet a speed of 100 knots?
    After you answer all these questions, the question is, will it really disappear by itself ...
    1. opus
      opus 11 January 2016 01: 16 New
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      1. Do we have a direct-flow nuclear reactor in our project (not to mention iron)?

      Why direct-flow nuclear water jet engine?


      And where is he "mentioned"?

      And so were the poison:
      11B91, RD-04109 (a small alteration for the doomsday, and not for the LV, will do) True traction / power is excessive. You can combine the m / y YaEDU "Zarya-3" and YaED "Topaz-1".
      The working fluid, cooler, water moderator. her a lot

      Quote: Old26
      2. Can it be "shoved" into a XNUMX-meter cylinder?

      I give a hint to the RTG-it is possible.

      Just temperature from 300 and above ° C is enough for the eyes
      Quote: Old26
      3. What will happen to such a torpedo at a depth of 1000 meters?

      belay
      ?
      What are the difficulties?
      DSV-2 Alvin manned 4500m
      Bluefin-21 (unmanned) also feels great at 4500m


      (doesn’t look like a torpedo by chance?)
      Quote: Old26
      How natural is the behavior of Colonel General

      I won’t answer. I haven’t been to meetings with presidents in the defense industry.
      Are there any other entries?
      Quote: Old26
      A document of this direction must be labeled "SS.OV".

      This is not technical documentation, but SLIDE for a President who has (let's say) a specific education

      Quote: Old26
      but figs with him, from the left corner.

      I’m in slides, I don’t understand their numbering. Is there any standard?
      Quote: Old26
      And while the speed is 100 knots?

      RT-45-2 from 1945 with the IDL had a speed of 75 knots (experimental USSR)
      21 "" Spearfish "(UK) seems to have a maximum of 80
    2. alexej123
      alexej123 11 January 2016 13: 56 New
      0
      I fully support the "vultures". He worked with Seo Seo vultures himself. There, in addition to the stamp, there must be details - if the document was printed - a number, etc.
  23. Old26
    Old26 10 January 2016 14: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: bulvas
    And then they got scared more than once, with the advent of new missiles. How their "Satan" scared you can not remind. Now the emergence of new missiles - "Bulava", "X-101", "Iskander", "Caliber", S-400, S-500 ..... also scares no less. Or not?


    As for "Satan" - they were afraid of her, silos of these ICBMs were their priority targets, but they usually scare the civilian population. What we are, what they are.
    Why should they be afraid of the "Bulava", which is inferior in its performance characteristics to their "Tridents".
    Or X-101? What is so extraordinary about them to be scary? Stealth? So they used this technology in the decommissioned "129s" back in the late 90s? Range? So 5500 km is achieved with a certain flight profile. The speed is subsonic. It's the same with the "Caliber", when a non-kill, indestructible, all-powerful "wunderwaffe" was made from a conventional cruise missile.
    What can scare them with the S-400 with the same set of missiles (for now) that the S-300? What can frighten a non-existent S-500 SAM?

    Well, then in turn. Nobody knows anything yet, but everyone is already scaring everyone. The same "Skif", which is unknown whether the American name "Canyon" corresponds to the American name or not (even the author of the "Militarization" resource, Dimmy not sure about it, no data). Either it is an underwater unmanned vehicle carrying weapons, or a "bottom" rocket. HZ.

    And it would be possible to "scare" the foe with a few more samples of our weapons about which there is practically no data, for example, the Karavan or Traffic light missile systems. You can too. Moreover, it is not clear that it is
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 11 January 2016 11: 49 New
      0
      We could frighten the opponents by creating a modernized version of the Voevoda ICBM with a monoblock nuclear orbital warhead with a capacity of 100 megatons.
  24. surrozh
    surrozh 10 January 2016 16: 05 New
    +1
    I don’t understand, Russia (and China) is openly called enemies, and what are we not going to call the United States the enemy? And we are not politically correct yet.
  25. for_White_Only
    for_White_Only 10 January 2016 18: 05 New
    -1
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: Megatron
    No concessions to adversaries, all concessions that we made to the Westerners - in the end they were used against us!

    Where did you see in the article something about concessions? Or did it so excited you: "weapons can be a subject of discussion in negotiations with Western countries, provided they refuse to deploy a global and regional missile defense system."
    The American missile defense system really poses a serious threat to Russia's security. Therefore, its ban is a blessing for our country. And if such a ban is achieved, including with the help of "Status-6", it is doubly good. The costs of developing and manufacturing the US global missile defense system and our local oceanic multipurpose system are incomparable.


    But why see that another is written in the article? this is so, pick up the pluses) ahah)
    1. cap
      cap 10 January 2016 19: 58 New
      0
      Quote: for_White_Only
      But why see that another is written in the article? this is so, pick up the pluses) ahah)


      And this is who, and what he sees. hi
  26. Garris199
    Garris199 10 January 2016 19: 50 New
    +1
    Somehow modestly appreciated the power of a 100-megaton charge. There, not only Los Angeles with its suburbs, but the entire state will be destroyed.
  27. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 10 January 2016 21: 08 New
    -2
    I want to insert five kopecks about the PRINCIPAL IMPLEMENTABILITY of such a project and about a possible way to block it.
    1. Feasibility to put it mildly in doubt. And that's why. How will this torpedo be controlled and induced? With a driving range of 10000 km. and allow a deviation of 5-10 km, the accuracy of the inertial guidance system should be colossal, namely, the gyroscope should not be more than 0.001 degrees per hour (!) wrong. These are practically limit values ​​for existing laser gyroscopes, and in laboratory consider ideal conditions.
    Who is interested in more details here http://fullref.ru/job_9029f8adc479665fab91d146247d9823.html
    2. Even if this navigation problem can be solved, the task of blocking such weapons is NOT DIFFICULT than its creation. And that's why. Goals for this weapon is not enough, well, let two three dozen. Undermining the device at a distance of 40-50 km from the object does not lead to significant losses. And therefore, the length of the anti-torpedo defense zone is not so significant. Throughout these zones, an EFFECTIVE autonomous interception system for such torpedoes can be created. Something like at a distance of 5-10 km from the place of destruction of the torpedo sensors detect it (by sound). Next, its trajectory is calculated and in a given place at a given time, a nuclear weapon is detonated in order to incapacitate a torpedo. Ammunition may be stationary on the way or it will be delivered to the meeting point by rocket.
    The result of an attempt in Russia to obtain an unblockable system for defeating the enemy will be another round of the arms race. The gain will be short-term. The undisputed gain is ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR ANTI-TORPONIC defense of cities on the coast. The magnitude of these costs will depend on the chosen method of protection. You can go by fencing with a solid metal network of all coastal cities (the cheapest and fastest way).
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 10 January 2016 21: 37 New
      +2
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      How will this torpedo be controlled and induced?

      What is so difficult here? If all the tasks and target designation are incorporated into this apparatus "on the doorstep." And control, as the article says, will take place at over-long waves.
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      And that's why. Goals for this weapon is not enough, well, let two three dozen.

      Even so, do you think this is small? Given the fact that most of the US industrial facilities are located at ports.
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      Throughout these zones, an EFFECTIVE autonomous interception system for such torpedoes can be created.

      I recall a joke - Let me turn my head, but I want to see it. Do Amers have torpedo-hunters who would hunt at such depths?

      Quote: Former battalion commander
      Undermining the device at a distance of 40-50 km from the object does not lead to significant losses.

      Do you think so? That is, a warhead of 100 mega tons, and cobalt, will be completely useless? Do you remember Chernobyl (the emission power of radioactivity was orders of magnitude lower) as the floor of the world stood on your ears.
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      The result of an attempt in Russia to obtain an unblockable system for defeating the enemy will be another round of the arms race.

      Do you think this race is not?
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      The gain will be short-term.

      And no one talks about winning. It's about a way of deterrence, when other means become not critical and not convincing.
      Quote: Former battalion commander
      You can go by fencing with a solid metal network of all coastal cities (the cheapest and fastest way).

      Do not be like Yatsenyuk ... he also decided to build a fence along the entire border with Russia.
      1. mav1971
        mav1971 10 January 2016 23: 44 New
        +1
        Quote: NEXUS

        What is so difficult here? If all the tasks and target designation are incorporated into this apparatus "on the doorstep." And control, as the article says, will take place at over-long waves.

        I advise you to read more closely.
        http://topwar.ru/31764-kak-svyazatsya-s-podvodnoy-lodkoy.html
        Especially about the penetration of radio waves in depth and about the data transfer rate.
        Accordingly, there can be no talk of any high-quality target designation, and especially operational management.
        Depth at 1km is uncontrollable. Inertial orientation with KVO at least in 10 miles is unattainable for such cruising ranges.

        Quote: NEXUS

        Even so, do you think this is small? Given the fact that most of the US industrial facilities are located at ports.

        Nevertheless, the main industrial facilities are located offshore. And far away.
        Remember again. That this prodigy needs a prodigy.
        Accordingly, we still need to remake or build 20 SSBNs from scratch?
        We will not achieve anything but the strongest dispersal of the Cold War with a sharp transition to the hot.
        Not a single admiral would allow such a carrier to go to sea without more than just escorting 2-3 Virginia or Elk. And direct contacts. Enclosures.
        The boat (Wunderwaffe carrier) should immediately return to base. At any price. Or sink.

        Quote: NEXUS

        I recall a joke - Let me turn my head, but I want to see it. Do Amers have torpedo-hunters who would hunt at such depths?

        The Americans came up with their Captor many years ago.
        Now they have re-equipped it on MK50. With a depth of 600 meters.
        Finishing up to 1000 meters is no longer a problem due to the fact that the large MKNNXX already knows how to walk at kilometer depth.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 10 January 2016 23: 59 New
          +1
          Quote: mav1971
          Accordingly, there can be no talk of any high-quality target designation, and especially operational management.

          You must have read it inattentively ... I said initially that, as an option, target designation "on the doorstep" is laid. And about the transmission of waves in the aquatic environment, I consider it as an auxiliary method.

          Quote: mav1971
          That this prodigy needs a prodigy.

          Nuclear submarine Belgorod (project 649) ... there is an opinion that it is made the carrier of Status-6
          Quote: mav1971
          Finishing up to 1000 meters is no longer a problem due to the fact that the large MKNNXX already knows how to walk at kilometer depth.

          It is interesting to see how our device will be "detected" at a kilometer depth, if the Varshavyanka mattresses are not really heard.
      2. mav1971
        mav1971 10 January 2016 23: 45 New
        0
        Quote: NEXUS

        Do you think so? That is, the warhead in 100 mega tons, and cobalt, will be generally useless?

        To reduce the defense ability of the adversary - is useless.
        Only in the case of a typhoon, a hurricane going through a blasting point towards the shore.
        And keep in mind that after undermining the cobalt warhead somewhere in the Norfolk region, it will be too late to remove the remaining population in Murmansk or Arkhangelsk in 30 days.

        Quote: NEXUS

        And no one talks about winning. It's about a way of deterrence, when other means become not critical and not convincing.

        This is not a deterrent.
        Containment is parity.
        What we were shown under the guise of Status-6 is a prodigy weapon.
        Moreover, as I have already tried more than once to convey - which has no superiority compared to ground-based thermonuclear fusion power in 100 times less.
        For water is a medium that does not give at a distance over 1 miles any destructive effect.
        There is no need to talk about the tsunami.
        Already probably a dozen times here gave layouts of the most powerful tsunamis in comparison with possible explosions. 100 megatons of thermonuclear fusion compared to a strong tsunami, it’s like a children's pistol with a suction cup compared to an artillery shell on 152mm.
        Only pollution.
        And so that "the whole world is in dust" and "after us even a flood" - there are many other means.
        And they don’t even need to report to the countries of the adversary ...


        Quote: NEXUS

        Do not be like Yatsenyuk ... he also decided to build a fence along the entire border with Russia.

        Sorry, but apparently you do not know. that network barriers are a normal practice for protecting a naval base. So I'm Yatsenyuk, you somehow ... hurried.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 11 January 2016 00: 09 New
          +1
          Quote: mav1971
          To reduce the defense ability of the adversary - is useless.

          That is, radiation, panic, destruction, damage to the industrial sector and the destruction of ports are all useless?
          Quote: mav1971
          This is not a deterrent.

          From what, for example, how does it differ, say TU-160 with X-102 from a nuclear submarine with such a device?
          Or is one of the components of the nuclear triad no longer an argument?
          Quote: mav1971
          Only pollution.

          Sorry, but this is not about breaking a sewer pipe, but about radioactive contamination.
          Quote: mav1971
          And so that "the whole world is in dust" and "after us even a flood" - there are many other means.
          And they don’t even need to report to the countries of the adversary ...

          I absolutely agree.
          Quote: mav1971
          Sorry, but apparently you do not know. that network barriers are a normal practice for protecting a naval base. So I'm Yatsenyuk, you somehow ... hurried.

          No ... the network along the perimeter of the mainland, covering a column of water per kilometer, is that simple. hi
  28. Old26
    Old26 10 January 2016 22: 28 New
    +1
    Quote: Garris199
    Somehow modestly appreciated the power of a 100-megaton charge. There, not only Los Angeles with its suburbs, but the entire state will be destroyed.

    It only seems so. The zone of continuous destruction during the explosion of 1 Mt bomb, depending on whether the ground or air has a radius of 2,2-2,9 km. A simple calculation shows that the radius at a 100 Mt charge will have a coefficient of 3,98 to a radius of 1 MT
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 10 January 2016 22: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      It only seems so. The zone of continuous destruction during the explosion of 1 Mt bomb, depending on whether the ground or air has a radius of 2,2-2,9 km. A simple calculation shows that the radius at a 100 Mt charge will have a coefficient of 3,98 to a radius of 1 MT

      Do you not take into account the emission of radiation, the effect of EMP, the shock wave and the temperature surge? A hydrogen bomb does not destroy buildings and level cities with the ground as thermonuclear weapons can do, but the damage is many times greater. All living things are simply destroyed. Roughly the same. makes a cobalt charge. There everything is more "sharpened" not for the destructive effect, but for the radioactive effect.
      Best regards hi
      1. mav1971
        mav1971 11 January 2016 00: 18 New
        +1
        Quote: NEXUS

        Do you not take into account the emission of radiation, the effect of EMP, the shock wave and the temperature surge? A hydrogen bomb does not destroy buildings and level cities with the ground as thermonuclear weapons can do, but the damage is many times greater. All living things are simply destroyed. Roughly the same. makes a cobalt charge. There everything is more "sharpened" not for the destructive effect, but for the radioactive effect.
        Best regards hi


        Water will quench 90-95% EMP, shock wave and temperature.

        Hydrogen, this is thermonuclear. used deuterium in conjunction with lithium.
        It alone is much cleaner if 238 uranium is not used.
        Examples on the New Earth.
        Cobalt - does not give a single plus to karma, i.e. It is not a power-boosting element.
        It just becomes very radioactive.
        Half-life of cobalt 5 years.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 11 January 2016 00: 34 New
          +1
          Quote: mav1971
          Half-life of cobalt 5 years.

          You are talking about beta decay.
          Cobalt-60 is a daughter product of β − decay of 60Fe nuclide (half-life is 1,5 (3) · 106 years [2]):
          Cobalt 60 also undergoes beta decay (half-life of 5,2713 years), as a result of which a stable nickel isotope 60Ni is formed:
          Best regards hi
    2. Garris199
      Garris199 11 January 2016 20: 13 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      It only seems so.

      Probably need to ask Yapov, they then did not seem enough 20 kilotons. In Nagasaki, there was continuous destruction in an area of ​​2 square kilometers. Instantly all died within a radius of almost 1 km. A fiery tornado raged on an area of ​​about 10 km2. About 80 thousand dead. How much later died from radiation sickness?
      And this is 20 kilotons. Here we are talking about a charge 5 times more powerful. Something is wrong with your calculations.
  29. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 10 January 2016 23: 36 New
    0
    It is imperative that atomic submarines can shoot with calibers, this will increase their versatility and reach of calibers around the world. In the United States, this issue was decided by installing inserts in the missile silos; instead of one nuclear warhead, 4 axes fit. The effectiveness of the use of nuclear submarines increases dramatically, thanks to the range of weapons (including conventional).
  30. Old26
    Old26 11 January 2016 00: 08 New
    0
    Dear Andrey !. I basically answered the phrase comrade Garris199who wrote:

    Somehow modestly appreciated the power of a 100-megaton charge. There, not only Los Angeles with its suburbs, but the entire state will be destroyed.

    It seemed to him a little destruction of the city with the suburbs and he hoped that the whole state would be destroyed. Incidentally, I was mistaken. The coefficient will be 4,64, not 3,98
    Now regarding your question

    Quote: NEXUS
    Do you not take into account the emission of radiation, the effect of EMP, the shock wave and the temperature surge? A hydrogen bomb does not destroy buildings and level cities with the ground as thermonuclear weapons can do, but the damage is many times greater. All living things are simply destroyed. Roughly the same. makes a cobalt charge. There, everything is more "sharpened" not for the destructive effect, but for the radioactive effect


    The main damaging factor in nuclear and thermonuclear munitions is still a shock wave. It is it that destroys cities, not EMP or radiation. The light emission factor is, of course, taken into account, but like radiation, it is exclusively in relation to manpower. The question was specifically about the destruction of the state. You will destroy the population of these factors (SI, PR), but not buildings and structures. As for the thermal (temperature) surge. In any case, the zone of the fireball will be smaller than the zone of impact of the shock wave. Zone of continuous destruction - i.e. all structures (or the vast majority of them) will be demolished for a 100 megaton charge will have a diameter of 20,5 to 27 km. I did not take into account either the strong zone or the medium destruction zone. Only solid.
    The diameter of the fireball in the tested AN-602 charge was 4 km. Again, of course, it will cause fires, but on a much smaller area than all types of destruction from a shock wave.

    Have fun with your passage:
    Hydrogen a bomb doesn’t destroy buildings and doesn’t level the city’s ground, as it can do thermonuclear weaponbut the damage is many times greater.
    laughing

    A hydrogen bomb is, let’s say, the colloquial equivalent (option) of a thermonuclear weapon (bomb). Just like an atomic bomb is the colloquial equivalent of a nuclear weapon (bomb). Therefore, your phrase in fact is as follows:

    Thermonuclear bomb it doesn’t destroy buildings and level the city with earth, as it can do thermonuclear weaponbut the damage is many times greater

    The phrase is masterpiece and completely meaningless.

    As for the "cobalt" bomb. This is just a "dirty" version of a conventional thermonuclear bomb. The destructive effect will be somewhat less, but the territory will be contaminated for hundreds and thousands of years. It is unlikely that now in the arsenals there are such ammunition (whether it was or was it just a purely theoretical version - I don't know). It is foolish to use weapons against the enemy, so that later (in the sense for the generation under which the war began) it would never be possible to use his territory
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 11 January 2016 00: 18 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      The main damaging factor in nuclear and thermonuclear munitions is still a shock wave. It is it that destroys cities, not EMP or radiation.

      Dear Vladimir, And what is the use of structures and cities in general if the population is dead or irradiated to the maximum?
      Quote: Old26
      A hydrogen bomb is, let’s say, a colloquial version of thermonuclear weapons (bombs). Just like an atomic bomb is a spoken version of a nuclear weapon (bomb). Therefore, your phrase in fact is as follows:
      The thermonuclear bomb doesn’t destroy buildings and level the city with earth, as a thermonuclear weapon can do, but the damage is many times greater
      The phrase is masterpiece and completely meaningless.

      You didn’t understand me ... I talked about the next effect. After the hydrogen bomb, there may be buildings, cities, etc. ... but there will be no people. Are there wars against people or buildings?
      Quote: Old26
      It is foolish to use weapons against the enemy, so that later (in the sense for the generation at which the war started) it would be impossible to use its territory

      There is a double-edged sword ... on the one hand, you are right, but on the other hand, what do we need these lands for, if you really did not live in Siberia and the Urals?
  31. Old26
    Old26 11 January 2016 00: 39 New
    +2
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Former battalion commander How will this torpedo be controlled and guided? What's so complicated about it? If all tasks and target designation are included in this device "on the doorstep." And control, as the article says, will take place at over-long waves

    The question is posed correctly. How?
    You can, of course, lay down all the tasks and target designation even before the shot, but the question arises. How to carry out target designation in RMV, if the object is at a depth of 1 km. In order for it to move autonomously in such a dense and heterogeneous environment as water, it needs some kind of observation and correction devices. How to do this in an "object" with a diameter of 1,6 meters? Will you put the GAK? How will you receive target designation? Extra-long waves for control are not suitable, to put it mildly. Yes, they are able to reach an object that is thousands of kilometers away from them. But they only have one very serious drawback. Very low data transfer rate. Voice communication is generally impossible, and data transmission is so "slow" that often coded messages of a general nature were received. And to control a "torpedo" going at a speed of 180 km / h is generally a circus. While the command to turn around is given, it will pass the turning point already. And how the place of this "Status" will be tracked in order to transmit specific commands
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 11 January 2016 00: 47 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      How to carry out target designation in the RMV, if the object goes at a depth of 1 km.

      And why? The BPA goes and goes ... the target designation was initially laid down. And the command to detonate may not follow at a depth of a kilometer. The device "came" to the specified point and waits for the command. Adjustment in real time is not necessary. Here are the spacecraft how it works at distances where the signal travels for a few minutes, so why can't it be?
  32. serverny
    serverny 11 January 2016 05: 07 New
    0
    Quote: Old26
    "Bulava", which in its performance characteristics is inferior to their "Tridents"

    Advice for the future - do not write so categorically about what you do not understand at all.
    Then your words may be listened to, and they will not be justifiably considered a local fool of the holy fool.

    This statement of yours is not just false, it is either idiocy against the background of uneducation and overstated FSW, or intentional Russophobic propaganda.
  33. Old warrior
    Old warrior 11 January 2016 17: 01 New
    0
    Things are good. Still to clean up the Government, so as not to constantly wait from the agents for the impact in the back, as it was in February 1917, and in August 1991. It's time to learn how to learn from history.
  34. Neko75
    Neko75 12 January 2016 20: 26 New
    +1
    Test more, develop more! And do not care at all!
  35. leon1204id
    leon1204id 12 January 2016 21: 22 New
    0
    The reality of such a project is distrusting.
    1 These 100 mgt must be blown up in the canyon, at the mouth of the river, etc. then at a distance of 50 miles you can expect a giant tsunami
    2. Radioactive contamination on such a scale is really a doomsday. This is from the opera "Perimeter"
    3. 1,5 m in diameter a torpedo sweeping under water at a speed of about 200 km / h is 58 m / s The roar will stand for tens of kilometers.
    4. The same is written on the fence, but it is advisable to know for sure.
    Author 5+ Knows how to make. hi
  36. Zefr
    Zefr 12 January 2016 22: 28 New
    0
    "these weapons can be the subject of discussion in negotiations with Western countries, provided they refuse to deploy a global and regional missile defense system"

    What are the negotiations on missile defense? That is, they demand something from us, and we agree that they will do something too. Or they won’t. And we must.

    Let’s the other way around - go to hell with all the bases around Russia at a distance of 3000 km, with the impossibility of recovery, and we will think about what to do next. Because there are no bases - there is no attack, there is no attack - there is no probability of getting by status. And everyone is happy.