Leonov about a unique rocket for the Buk-M3 and not only

91
A unique new missile was created for the Buk-M3 medium-range air defense system, the Russian Service said on air News»Head of the Air Defense Forces of the Ground Forces Alexander Leonov.

Leonov about a unique rocket for the Buk-M3 and not only


“In the transport-launch containers (complex) there are six missiles in each self-propelled firing system. Rockets have become more compact, but, nevertheless, they fly faster, farther and more accurately. That is, a new unique rocket has been created, which will make it more likely to destroy air targets, ”Leonov quotes. TASS.

“The capacity of each installation has increased from four to six channels, which has increased productivity in 1,5 times,” he said.

Earlier it was reported that the "Buk-M3" will be adopted by the end of this year, and in the new year will begin to enter the army.

In addition, "a groundwork has been created to create a promising MANPADS, which will begin to arrive in a few years, and will already be protected from those jamming complexes that have just been developed and are being supplied to equip the advanced countries of the world, primarily from laser interference," he said. .

“The whole line of anti-aircraft missile systems comes to the air defense forces. The C-300B4 complex is unique. It allows you to fight with any means of air attack, including "avaksy", reconnaissance aircraft, jammers, "- said Leonov, answering the corresponding question of the journalist.

“The range of the C-300B4 is up to 350 km,” the general explained.

“Hypersonic air attacks require a completely different approach to the fulfillment of air defense tasks and the development of new systems,” he said.

According to the general, “the C-300B4 complex has two types of missiles, one of them is hypersonic, which allows you to hit ballistic aerial targets on hypersonic.”
  • "Almaz-Antey"
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +51
    27 December 2015 13: 33
    I hope that the shortest time will pass from "created" to being put into service. smile
    1. +51
      27 December 2015 13: 35
      Quote: Black
      I hope that the shortest time will pass from "created" to being put into service. smile

      Can you read? Although, if you write, you know how. smile So here is a quote from the article "Earlier it was reported that" Buk-M3 " will be adopted by the end of this year, and in the new year will begin to enter the troops "
      Our air defense is traditionally pleasing - after all, the strongest in the world, which no one disputes.
      1. +7
        27 December 2015 14: 52
        “The whole line of anti-aircraft missile systems comes to the air defense forces. The C-300B4 complex is unique. It allows you to fight with any means of air attack, including "avaksy", reconnaissance aircraft, jammers, "- said Leonov, answering the corresponding question of the journalist.


        Re-equipment is in progress not so fast, but it is progressing even somewhere somewhere ahead of plans.
        1. +7
          27 December 2015 16: 28
          From this, my soul somehow warms up !!!
          1. +3
            27 December 2015 21: 01
            It will become warmer when numerous gaps in the defense are closed, even in the USSR the entire territory did not overlap (and it was unrealistic). For any good news, the old complexes need to be modernized.
            Quote: Platonitch
            From this, my soul somehow warms up !!!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +33
        27 December 2015 14: 53
        I came across the opinion that everything connected with Buks, Torahs and other "outdated systems" should be melted down. Mistake dear. Modernization, innovative technologies, new types of missiles, increasing the training of crews and, in the future, the planned re-equipment of all units on time. There is no need to reinvent the elephant - these systems will serve in new conditions for a very long time. After such modernizations, they only remotely resemble themselves - in reality, this is something completely new. At times increased efficiency. Why waste a rocket in the tens or even hundreds of thousands. It is enough to spend 5 thousand. The main thing is that the result is guaranteed to be the same - the enemy is shot down and fried where it should.
      4. +8
        27 December 2015 14: 57
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And here is a quote from the article "Earlier it was reported that the Buk-M3 will be put into service by the end of this year, and in the new year will begin to enter the troops"
        - Assad after the settlement in Syria is the most. Israel will not be able to establish long-range air defense systems, because the whole territory of Israel is covered by such a complex, but Buk-M3 is just what you need. And afford Syria, because long-range air defense systems in addition to redundancy for Syria is also very expensive.
        1. +4
          27 December 2015 16: 38
          Quote: aksakal
          Israel will not be able to establish long-range air defense systems, because the whole territory of Israel is covered by such a complex

          A long-range air defense systems (S-300VM) are available there from another neighbor of Israel - Egypt.
          1. +33
            27 December 2015 18: 16
            The S-300V4 air defense team is,
            2 regiments of 2 battalions of 4 batteries = 16 batteries
            Battery:
            1 launcher with 2 9M82MV missiles with a range of 385 km.
            2 launchers with 4 9M83M missiles with a range of 200 km.
            + 1 ROM with 2 9M82MV
            + 2 ROMs with 4 9M83M
            We get to the volley! 385 km in range, 185 km in altitude. - 64 missiles 9M82MV
            Well, and against aerodynamic targets - 256 9M83M missiles
            Total: 320 SAM in salvo!
            + 2 ACS Polyana D4M1, give target designation for 450 targets at a time! and keep "in mind" another 1000.
            + 2 Sky-IED radars with a range of 600 km.
            1. +1
              28 December 2015 11: 35
              While the Israelis have the Golan Heights, it makes no sense to install S-300 installations against Israel. Medium-range with minimum altitude - yes, it is necessary.
              Against the northern neighbor with the ambitions of the Sultan, the S-300 will be effective. In general, Syria was "lucky" with its neighbors - all strong armies and air forces.
        2. 0
          28 December 2015 12: 11
          ..... here the Buk-M3 is just what you need. And afford Syria, because long-range air defense systems in addition to redundancy for Syria is also very expensive .....


          ..... It bribes that it is mobile - it is not tied to a guidance station (as far as I understand it is individual) .... And this is important .... lol
      5. +1
        28 December 2015 09: 58
        If so, then the level of our air defense will increase significantly, and if ours have already announced the presence of hypersonic missiles - this is a very serious argument !!!!!!!!
    2. +4
      27 December 2015 13: 37
      Quote: Black
      the shortest time will pass before being adopted.

      They can be adopted relatively quickly. The main question is at what pace the production of such complexes will be carried out.
    3. +16
      27 December 2015 13: 49
      There is such an indicator as "the effectiveness of hitting the target", for Buk-M2E it is 0,6-0,7, if it is increased to 0.95, or close - then this is a huge achievement! sorry they didn't give exact numbers ...
      in amers, the effectiveness of hitting a target on the best samples is 0.6 - 0.5 ...
      1. +5
        27 December 2015 14: 22
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        There is such an indicator as "the effectiveness of hitting the target", for Buk-M2E it is 0,6-0,7, if it is increased to 0.95, or close - then this is a huge achievement! sorry they didn't give exact numbers ...

        If by the effectiveness of hitting a target, you meant (as it really is) the effectiveness of hitting a target with one missile in the range of 0,6 - 0,7 (that is why the launch of two missiles at one target was practiced at once), then by "increasing the performance of the complex 1,5 times ", and the increase in this efficiency is not meant, as well in these 1,5 times - i.e. up to 0,95. This refers to the increase in the number of missiles on the launcher, and how much more accurately these missiles will hit the target - this is not said.
        1. +3
          27 December 2015 14: 55
          “The capacity of each installation has increased from four to six channels, which has increased productivity in 1,5 times,” he said.
        2. +2
          27 December 2015 15: 15
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Quote: Denis Obukhov
          There is such an indicator as "the effectiveness of hitting the target", for Buk-M2E it is 0,6-0,7, if it is increased to 0.95, or close - then this is a huge achievement! sorry they didn't give exact numbers ...

          If by the effectiveness of hitting a target, you meant (as it really is) the effectiveness of hitting a target with one missile in the range of 0,6 - 0,7 (that is why the launch of two missiles at one target was practiced at once), then by "increasing the performance of the complex 1,5 times ", and the increase in this efficiency is not meant, as well in these 1,5 times - i.e. up to 0,95. This refers to the increase in the number of missiles on the launcher, and how much more accurately these missiles will hit the target - this is not said.



          There is one. several times it slipped from the military that our performance characteristics of their weapons are underestimated, the Americans - their performance characteristics are overestimated. Whatever the coefficient for reliability, there are always two consumption .. no need to save on matches ..;)
          1. +4
            27 December 2015 15: 52
            Quote: Denis Obukhov
            There is one. several times it slipped from the military that our performance characteristics of their weapons are underestimated, the Americans - their performance characteristics are overestimated. Whatever the coefficient for reliability, there are always two consumption .. no need to save on matches ..;)

            Do not underestimate. I talked with one of the designers of Klab .., they came to us when the Indians on the 877s started to install them, from his words .. The performance characteristics are real, but for the most severe conditions. For example, the stylet flew 2k more than prescribed in its performance characteristics.
            1. +18
              27 December 2015 17: 07
              Quite possible. I know a little about how electronics were tested in the USSR. Indeed, there were "our chips are the largest chips in the world." But on the other hand, they withstood the mechano-thermo-X-ray-chemical abuse, namely the abuse, i.e. reliability was an order of magnitude higher than amerovsky. For example, the electronics of the F-111, received in the 70s from Vietnam, could not even pass only mechanical tests with us.
              1. +18
                27 December 2015 17: 37
                Quote: My address
                Indeed, there were "our chips are the largest chips in the world."

                - switched to import - and the result is obvious. There is no way to decipher the black box from the SU-24 bomber, everything is destroyed there. Whoever watched the opening of the black box - he saw how the specialists, after opening, were simply fucking with what was installed in this box. "Checkmate, everything is broken here! Checkmate again!" On the Worldcrisis website, one specialist said that there is only one Soviet chip, the largest in this box, but made of gold, so it is one and a whole, the rest of the chips are well.
                I think maybe stop laughing at the size, and resume their release? And even the black boxes no longer fulfill what they are supposed to do, but what if such chips are in combat units? It can refuse at the right time!
              2. +1
                28 December 2015 20: 23
                Quote: My address
                Quite possible. I know a little about how electronics were tested in the USSR. Indeed, there were "our chips are the largest chips in the world." But on the other hand, they withstood the mechano-thermo-X-ray-chemical abuse, namely the abuse, i.e. reliability was an order of magnitude higher than amerovsky. For example, the electronics of the F-111, received in the 70s from Vietnam, could not even pass only mechanical tests with us.


                Something we have different opinions.
                As far as I know, during the standard application of the F-111, namely flight in the mode of enveloping the terrain, the airplane is subject to constant overloads. And the shaking is very strong. especially where such a flight is needed. In hilly and mountainous terrain.
                And their electronics allowed it.
                and moreover, on tests of the "pigs" in automatic flight with a rounding of the relief they reached speeds of 1.2M at an altitude of 60-80 meters.
                And ours were not able to implement a similar flight mode. Just because of the electronics and its mechanical strength.
                Something like that! :)
        3. 0
          27 December 2015 16: 23
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          then by "increasing the productivity of the complex by 1,5 times" does not mean an increase in this efficiency, also by these 1,5 times - i.e. up to 0,95. This refers to the increase in the number of missiles on the launcher, and how much more accurately these missiles will hit the target - this is not said.

          Not professionally familiar with air defense systems. The nominal consumption of missiles for the 1st target of the 2nd missile? And is the norm different from the types of air defense systems?
          1. +6
            27 December 2015 17: 30
            Quote: Lt. air force reserve
            Not professionally familiar with air defense systems. The nominal consumption of missiles for the 1st target of the 2nd missile? And is the norm different from the types of air defense systems?

            I can’t say for sure about modern systems, but when I was at the S-125, there was such a standard. If I’m not mistaken, then on the early S-300 missiles consumption was also up to two for one target.
        4. +3
          27 December 2015 17: 28
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          the effectiveness of hitting a target with one missile in the range of 0,6 - 0,7
          - not enough? Such efficiency is permissible for long-range air-to-air missiles, but for stationary air defense systems ... the S-0,9 has always had 300, and in general at exhibitions during demonstration firing the target was hit by the very first missile.

          Here was the S-200 complex at live firing in Sary-Shagan, and all our calculations were always struck by the first and only missile.
          Perhaps wrong.
          1. +2
            27 December 2015 17: 52
            Quote: aksakal
            the effectiveness of hitting a target with one missile in the range of 0,6 - 0,7 - is it not enough? Such efficiency is permissible for long-range air-to-air missiles, but for stationary air defense systems ... the S-0,9 has always had 300,

            The coefficient 0,6 - 0,7 is not my statement, but a visitor under the nickname "Denis Obukhov". The S-300 has a coefficient of 0,9 - you are right here. But they are guided to the target, still two missiles, if the first does not destroy the target, then the second starts automatically, in the latest upgrades, it is possible to switch to manual control. If someone corrects me, I would be very grateful.
          2. 0
            27 December 2015 21: 30
            Not much, of course.
            By aerodynamic purpose Buk M3 - 0,99
          3. 0
            28 December 2015 08: 26
            I would say the expense is determined by the senior manager for the situation, com. a regiment, for example, or a division commander, if one acts autonomously.

            And so, from practice, at the test site I saw a consumption of 6 (!), Although for the Wasps division, and on finishing off the Reis target (UAV Tu-143), which left both from the 200th and the 300th, although it was damaged, the autopilot failed, did not want to land on a parachute in the right place (those had a flow rate of 2, since the target height was up to 1000).
            What drones did in the 70s!
        5. +7
          27 December 2015 18: 51
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          "increase in the productivity of the complex by 1,5 times" does not mean an increase in this efficiency, also by these 1,5 times - i.e. up to 0,95. This refers to the increase in the number of missiles on the launcher.
          If memory serves, then the fire performance of the SAM complex is the number of targets fired per unit of time. Usually take a minute. Judging by the fact that the missile was hidden in the TPK, the influence of the ship's system "Shtil-1" is strong here.
          The use of 9M317M missiles and vertical launch launchers gave the air defense system a completely new quality. The fire performance of the air defense missile system has significantly increased, the rate of fire has increased (each missile can be launched every 1-2 seconds instead of 12 seconds for a single-beam oblique PU SAM "Uragan"), the reaction time, weight and dimensions of the complex have decreased ...
          I think the "vertical configuration" of the air defense missile system will be the main one during the modernization of the EM 956 pr.
          1. 0
            29 December 2015 08: 13
            The complex in all respects becomes universal. By the principle: Wherever I want, I’ll put it there.
      2. -2
        27 December 2015 14: 53
        Dear Denis Obukhov!
        Let's, right away, discard such concepts as "if", "if only," and "what if". For a serious server "topwar.ru" such concepts are not suitable!
        You write that "the effectiveness of hitting a target" for Buk-M2E is 0,6-0,7, while for "amers" the effectiveness of hitting a target on the best samples is 0.6 - 0.5. What do you mean? "Minus 0,6"? The more "Americans" shoot, the less they hit? Just inattention when writing a comment or ...?
        Did you take this data about "the effectiveness of hitting a target" from open sources that always lie, or from secret documents of both the Russian and the US Defense Ministry (your statement is fraught with recognition of treason or recognition of espionage)? Or, God forbid, the data on the "effectiveness of hitting the target" you took from the advertising brochures of manufacturers? Or from the statements of representatives of the Ministry of Defense?
        1. +1
          28 December 2015 03: 09
          Quote: hrad
          - 0.6 - 0.5. What do you mean? "Minus 0,6"? The more "Americans" shoot, the less they hit? Just inattention when writing a comment or ...?

          Sorry, but your comment is pure populism (drawing attention to the insignificant). Everyone understood that the first "-" was used as a dash.
          If you have other TTX data (not from open sources), then either bother to provide them, or give a logical refutation. Everything else is demagogy.
          PS there was a dash in the last sentence.
      3. 0
        29 December 2015 09: 39
        Initially, the Buk 9K37 military air defense missile system was intended to combat aerodynamic targets in radio countermeasures, and in the long term - to combat Lance ballistic missiles.
        The probability of defeat (one SAM) for the Buk 9K37 air defense system:
        fighter 0,8., 0,9
        Helicopter 0,3., 0,6
        cruise missile 0,25.,0,5
        Buk-M2E has the probability of hitting targets with one missile:
        tactical aircraft and helicopters 0,9 – 0.95
        tactical ballistic missiles 0,6 – 0,7
        http://topwar.ru/83497-.html
        There are changes.
    4. 0
      27 December 2015 14: 08
      Quote: Black
      I hope that the shortest time will pass from "created" to being put into service. smile

      There’s no need to talk much: things speak for themselves. Military engineers are doing their best, perfecting Russian weapons, so that there are no analogues in the world. Well, Minister of Defense S. Shoigu correctly put the emphasis, trying to increase the combat readiness of the Armed Forces of the country. After all, the military power of Russia is the guarantee of peace for our people!
    5. -7
      27 December 2015 16: 51
      and we hope that there will be no crude and not suitable as a boulder or first yars!
      1. +4
        27 December 2015 19: 10
        Quote: NOC-VVS
        will not be raw and not suitable as a boulder or first yars!
        Yes, it seems that all childhood illnesses are behind and the last launches of the Bulava were successful, even with the salvo firing of 2 ICBMs on November 14. 2015 from the board of the APRK "Vladimir Monomakh". Judging by the video, the rate of fire is 5 sec. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Svdgop5D4wU
    6. 0
      27 December 2015 19: 29
      It would be desirable, time and so to spare
    7. +8
      27 December 2015 20: 55
      Upgrading only missiles is much cheaper than developing the entire complex. “Buk M3” slowly gets into the “zone” C 300, “Tor” into the zone “Buka”, “Carapace” into the zone “Torah”! Directly "Faster, Higher, Stronger." It seems to me that the breakthrough occurred in the energy of fuel for solid rockets, on which new achievements are based .. This allowed us to reduce the weight of warheads and increase the amount of fuel. The probability of hitting the target became 99.999, if not mistaken.


      Even the ultralight "Willow" has increased the ceiling to 4.5 km!

      clickable.
    8. 0
      28 December 2015 08: 24
      Google complex S-300B4, we get:
      12.03.2012
      The Russian Defense Ministry has signed a contract with the Almaz-Antey air defense concern for the supply of S-300V4 anti-aircraft missile systems, Interfax reports, citing a representative of the military department. The agreement is for three years. The source of the agency did not specify how many complexes the Ministry of Defense bought, but noted that the South Military District will receive the first three S-300V4 divisions.
      The signed contract provides for an advance payment to Almaz-Antey and its contractors in the amount of 80 percent of the total cost of the agreement. Exactly what amount is referred to in the contract is also not reported ...
      Complexes S-300V4, called by some sources "Vityaz" (?!?!?) ...
      ... In 2011, the Russian army will be equipped with a new high-performance modification of the S-300 - S-300B4 anti-aircraft missile system (SAM), the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry said. This SAM model has performance characteristics that exceed the capabilities of the previous modification - S-300V3 - 1,5-2,3 times ...
      source http://bastion-karpenko.narod.ru/S-300V4.html
      Rhetorical question: NU And ???
      ps: what's the wild photoshop in the article? is it really really "Used photographs:" Almaz-Antey ""
  2. +6
    27 December 2015 13: 41
    Simply put, they are engaged not only in creating new systems, but also in "pulling up" those already in service.
    This is the optimal solution that allows you to support air defense / missile defense at a fairly high degree, without failures during rearmament. Everywhere it would be like this, incl. throughout the industry. Thank God that the idiotic postulate of Yegor Daidar and other Chubais - "the market organizes everything," is not applied to defense.
  3. +4
    27 December 2015 13: 42
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    will be adopted by the end of this year,

    there will be some difference between WILL BE ACCEPTED and ACCEPTED, especially since there is nothing left before the end of this year wink
  4. +2
    27 December 2015 13: 45
    According to the general, “the S-300V4 complex has two types of missiles, one of them is hypersonic

    How many grandmas have thrown into the hypersound and still thunder, but just a rocket costing 1000 orders of magnitude less and ... request
    1. +3
      27 December 2015 14: 39
      Hypersonic aircraft and missiles have a future, so let the attendants swell it.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    27 December 2015 13: 50
    So here you are, the killer of the "Peaceful American Bombers Bearing Democracy" ™!

    ... in the instructions supplement in small print - "... to achieve a high-quality result, use in combination with the drugs" S-300 "," Pantsir C1 "," Krasuha "," Mercury "," Avtobaza "."
  7. +1
    27 December 2015 13: 56
    I want one at least one real goal from 82 years old and all are just targets. They asked the Yugi of the "Ural pathfinder" striped with the French to click, but the paid agent to whom the enemies of the country built another Ulyanovsk hut was afraid.
    1. +4
      27 December 2015 19: 21
      Quote: 23424636
      They asked the Yugi "Ural pathfinder" striped with the French to click, but the paid agent, to whom the enemies of the country built another Ulyanovsk hut, was afraid.

      He was just "very worried, you know" for its spread across the planet! If the "voynichi" would have knocked down striped and paddling pads over the South, you see, and democracy would have stalled for a while ... And this is a terrible loss for the champions of this very democracy.
      HER, would not have been allowed to do so by the 200 counselors-crusaders who sat in their offices and waved the hand of our homegrown reformers-privatizers. bully
  8. +3
    27 December 2015 13: 58
    The S-300V4 complex is unique. It allows you to fight any means of air attack, including avaks, reconnaissance aircraft, jammers "
    They will train the electronic warfare of KRET well, confirm our advantages in practice. How are the performance characteristics of electronic warfare implemented in combat use and the tactics of influencing the "partners" If not worse than Khibinami according to D. Kuk, then go ahead and sing!
    That would be by the way to test the S-300V4 complex to cover our pilots and airfields in Syria. And then they announced NATO's readiness to send German "Avaks" to Turkey.
  9. +5
    27 December 2015 14: 01
    Tests of the Buk-M2 SAM:



    Military engineers are doing their best, perfecting Russian weapons, so that there are no analogues in the world. Well, Minister of Defense S. Shoigu correctly put the emphasis, trying to increase the combat readiness of the Armed Forces of the country. After all, the military power of Russia is the guarantee of peace for our people!



    More information about air defense systems is here. http://nevskii-bastion.ru/buk-m3/
    1. +3
      27 December 2015 18: 20
      SAM Buk-M3 transport and loading machine 12 missiles
    2. 0
      29 December 2015 09: 58
      interesting cutting, especially off-screen commentator delivers on 1-09 laughing
  10. +4
    27 December 2015 14: 01
    It’s like the golden age of missiles has come ... you don’t have time to digest the information .. Under a good umbrella and the soldier is comfortable
    1. +3
      27 December 2015 14: 07
      The main thing in NATE is the age of frustration. The question constantly hangs: is it worth it? And how at the same time is not about.
  11. +4
    27 December 2015 14: 11
    More and more often news about new air defense systems appears, aliens have shared their technologies (just kidding). And here's another new missile defense complex - "willow" just accepted for armament - these are the wonders of design thought.
    1. +1
      27 December 2015 14: 42
      We made a willow based on the NEEDLE - we quickly tested and accepted it.
    2. -26
      27 December 2015 14: 42
      These are not aliens, but the American company Raytheon (Rayzion) drives everyone.
      (Aegis system, Standard Missile SM-2, SM-3 missiles)
      She is now the world leader in air defense / missile defense.
      Sometimes she shares technology herself, sometimes she has hackers
      borrow technology and ideas ... One way or another, it sets the pace. crying
      1. +4
        27 December 2015 14: 58
        I agree that in the new beech they made it convenient to store missiles, reload in a package, and put new electronics. in the USA it is necessary to adopt the communication of different systems into one complex, this is why they are strong. To hit the target in one area of ​​work was not.
        1. +3
          27 December 2015 19: 37
          Quote: Zaurbek
          in the USA it is necessary to adopt the communication of different systems into one complex, this is why they are strong. To hit the target in one area of ​​work was not.

          Respected! The fleet has already mastered this at the Shtil-1 air defense missile system, Polyment-Reduta ... I believe that we will not stop there. Yes
      2. 0
        27 December 2015 14: 58
        I agree that in the new beech they made it convenient to store missiles, reload in a package, and put new electronics. in the USA it is necessary to adopt the communication of different systems into one complex, this is why they are strong. To hit the target in one area of ​​work was not.
      3. 0
        27 December 2015 16: 35
        On the high banks of the Amur
        http://alex-anpilogov.livejournal.com/109887.html
        There and about SOI even.
      4. 0
        27 December 2015 16: 35
        On the high banks of the Amur
        http://alex-anpilogov.livejournal.com/109887.html
        There and about SOI even.
      5. 0
        27 December 2015 17: 55
        Not a company, but some sort of entrance yard.
      6. +3
        27 December 2015 20: 56
        Quote: voyaka uh
        customize all the American company Raytheon (Rayzion).

        - this which is released by Mr. ... clearly under the name "Patriot" developed? Nu-nu, world leader in air defense laughing laughing laughing
        The rockets themselves are at the level, I do not argue, there is still an unsolved technology of kinetic interception, but this is all that this Revision has in its assets, and this does not make it a leader in air defense / missile defense in any way, just the number of the best companies in the world, and then with a stretch
      7. 0
        28 December 2015 13: 33
        I don’t know how Ration shares the info, but I’m not averse to poking it myself - that's for sure!
      8. +1
        28 December 2015 16: 47
        Let's be frank. Not a company, cool, by the way, drives everyone, but the decisions of the American government. Without the decisions of the US leadership, there would be no Standard Missile. Now essentially. In terms of missile technology SM-2, SM-3 are certainly advanced in the field of interception of medium and short-range missiles and possibly for SM-3 to intercept individual ICBM head units on the final flight path. However, and most importantly, SM-3 has the ability to destroy satellites in low orbits. The deployment of this system essentially changes the strategic balance between nuclear powers with satellites in low orbits, and these are military satellites. So it gave a similar deployment for the United States. Can there be confidence in their superiority and invulnerability? Not at all. The security of the United States and its space grouping has not increased, but rather worsened. There is no secret that the PRC has already tested its anti-satellite weapons, and Russia will soon adopt even more advanced S-500 complex than Aegis. In addition, it will follow race to replace expensive satellites with new ones capable of recognizing an attack and maneuvering away from missiles. No dear, Raytheon does not manage to be in the undisputed leaders. And it is worth remembering the Russian proverb, for every tricky w-y, there is x with a screw.
      9. 0
        29 December 2015 17: 24
        @voyaka_uh, I do not agree with you
        missiles about a little on other principles: firstly, there is a kinetic defeat of the target (which is generally unique);
        further they are capable of intercepting only ballistic targets at a height of at least 60 km;
        they do not take into account multiple warheads, and effectively intercept missiles in the initial slow section of the trajectory. so that the spread of technology from the MISLs standards was allegedly affecting the regimental air defense designed to deal with low-flying and maneuverable targets.
        all the more so, western air defenses of this class traditionally lag behind in characteristics, first of all everything is poured into aviation as an air defense system.

        By the way, your dome is a very interesting system and trophies, but they are not designed for interference
  12. +8
    27 December 2015 14: 11
    Obviously, our chemists have made a "breakthrough" in the energy of solid fuels. Otherwise, there are no options for such a mass production of new missiles with unique characteristics in terms of range and speed. The point is clearly not only in the "electronic filling". Even the ultralight "Verba" raised the ceiling a kilometer!
    1. +1
      27 December 2015 14: 16
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Obviously, our chemists have made a "breakthrough" in the energy of solid fuels.

      Yes! Most likely they switched to octogen.
  13. +3
    27 December 2015 14: 19
    Success! Separated air defense and missile defense is the most important area of ​​our air defense from missiles of various types to aviation.
  14. +1
    27 December 2015 14: 37
    It seems like such rockets go to the new "Calm", don't they?
    1. +1
      27 December 2015 16: 07
      Well, how to "look" .... SAMs for the Buk-M3 air defense system have the index 9M317M (x); that is, a whole "series" of missiles has been developed. Basically, these missiles can be classified into 2 "groups": with semi-active and active radar "homing heads". For most modifications, an inclined start is provided, but there is also a vertical launch. A number of "sources" claim that the 9M317ME missile for the ship-based air defense system "Shtil-1" is from this "series".
  15. 0
    27 December 2015 14: 45
    Dear SRC P-15! You are not quite right. The fact is that a larger number of missiles ready for launch at a launcher increases the chances of multiple shelling of the same target. And then the likelihood of her defeat increases. For example, when firing a target with two missiles, the probability of which is W1, the probability of hitting the target will be W2 = 1- (1-W1) x (1-W1).
  16. 0
    27 December 2015 14: 57
    In short, it’s clear that there is a strengthening and modernization of air defense and this is good. I just get confused about beech and armor, about their mission.
  17. +1
    27 December 2015 15: 06
    The increased channeling of the Buk-M3, as well as the increased ammunition load, are very "useful" for massive raids by the CD, which is what our "sworn friends" from the West love to do.
    Io what is needed.
  18. +4
    27 December 2015 15: 12
    The main thing is to save the BUK-M3 school! Apparently, this school is an extremely necessary combination of operational and strategic air defense !!!
  19. +1
    27 December 2015 15: 18
    nice to read, cheers to military engineers! keep it up and don't stop!
  20. +2
    27 December 2015 16: 13
    Such news is encouraging.
  21. +1
    27 December 2015 16: 13
    But what is increased channelism, do you even know? What is it for? It's interesting to just read the calculations of respected experts.
  22. +4
    27 December 2015 16: 28
    The S-300V4 air defense system was mentioned here. I don't understand everything about this air defense system. Somehow I came across such data that the latest modifications of 9M82 / 83 missiles with "final indexing" -M1? Or M2? have a "range" of up to 350 km. It was this fact that served for the decision to resume production of the S-300V4 complexes; for a long time it was not possible to solve the problems with the 40N6 missile for the S-400 air defense system. Recently I made an attempt again to find the mentioned data on the S-300V4 air defense system ...... and .... did not find anything about the 9M82 / 83 missiles (M1? / M2?), But a link appeared that the S-300V4 would use the 40N6 missile of the S-400 complex.
  23. +2
    27 December 2015 16: 39
    It often seems that our rocket designers are working wonders. Perhaps this area of ​​military equipment is simply charging with work, a very interesting direction. Behind is the country.
  24. -12
    27 December 2015 16: 53
    Leonov ... And what else did Kimlyuzhinov say?
    We admire the words of those who personally and closely interacted with aliens?
    The main thing is to say it right and on time, and it doesn’t matter anymore that the roommate Napoleon says the same.
    For those who are not in the know. Leonov has long and far and deeply gone mad. With all due respect to him, this uncle has ceased (for a long time) to be friends with brains. hi
    We smile and wave. (Penguins, from the south of Africa, the island is there)
  25. +2
    27 December 2015 16: 55
    This is great, which means that industry is starting to catch up with the Wishlist of the military, whom they lost in the dashing 80s and 90s.
  26. +1
    27 December 2015 17: 03
    According to the commander in chief, in the near future the arrival of the S-500 in the territory of the Arab Republic is expected.

    Read on: http://izvestia.ru/news/600621#ixzz3vWu2QpsL

    Is this true or idle talk?
    1. 0
      27 December 2015 17: 28
      Hmm .. if from Leonov something chatter hi
      Everything else can be true.
      1. 0
        27 December 2015 19: 41
        For harmful talk in the field of defense, it is necessary to excommunicate from access to the Internet.
    2. +1
      27 December 2015 19: 39
      Quote: Good AAAH
      According to the commander in chief, in the near future the arrival of the S-500 in the territory of the Arab Republic is expected.

      Read on: http://izvestia.ru/news/600621#ixzz3vWu2QpsL

      Is this true or idle talk?

      Firstly, even your link says that the aerospace forces are awaiting the arrival of the S-500 (just the receipt, there is no question about the ATS), and secondly, the S-500 is only EXPECTED in 2016.
      1. 0
        27 December 2015 20: 29
        Firstly, even your link says that the aerospace forces are awaiting the arrival of the S-500 (just the receipt, there is no question about the ATS), and secondly, the S-500 is only EXPECTED in 2016.

        Like this? And where did I copy about the Arab Republic? Maybe it's some other, not ATS?

        Russian Aerospace Forces cleaned up the sky over Syria thanks to the S-400

        According to the commander in chief, in the near future the arrival of the S-500 in the territory of the Arab Republic is expected.


        Read on: http://izvestia.ru/news/600621#ixzz3vXimHeGp

        Immediately after the headline.
        1. 0
          27 December 2015 20: 44
          Quote: Good AAAH
          Like this? And where did I copy about the Arab Republic? Maybe it's some other, not ATS?

          Well, a stupid journalist writes "according to ...", and further in the text: "... The S-400 is a reliable defense of air lines, and at the moment the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are awaiting the arrival of the S-500." If you understand in Russian, then the VKS will receive the S-500, but there is, as it were, nothing about the delivery to the SAR. request Although the text also says VSK. laughing I don’t know what it is, maybe a military construction company. smile
        2. +5
          27 December 2015 20: 50
          According to the commander in chief, in the near future the arrival of the S-500 in the territory of the Arab Republic is expected.

          Order in the skies over Syria was restored thanks to the S-400 anti-aircraft missile system, delivered to the territory of the Arab Republic to strengthen the Khmeimim air base on November 26, said Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Aerospace Forces Viktor Bondarev.

          According to him, the S-400 is a reliable defense of the air borders, and at the moment, the VSK of the Russian Federation is awaiting the arrival of the S-500. In addition, the Tu-160 White Swan bomber will be presented in a new configuration in the near future, he added.

          Bondarev also noted that Russian pilots have never attacked civilian targets in Syria, reports TASS.

          “I want to say with dignity that during my entire stay there my pilots never missed, never struck at“ forbidden ”objects, the so-called“ sensitive places ”- these are schools, hospitals, mosques, other holy places” “He said, adding that the operation was carefully thought out.

          Russia made the decision to transfer the latest S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria after Turkey shot down the Russian Su-24 bomber. The incident occurred on November 24. The Su-24, which was carrying out a combat mission as part of the fight against Daesh, was shot down by a Turkish F16 fighter near the border with Turkey. However, the Turkish military still deny that the Russian plane did not violate the borders of the country's airspace.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  27. 0
    27 December 2015 17: 22
    There is an escalation of tension. Bulgarian media.

    Miroslav Lazanski, Serbian military analyst and candidate for Minister of Defense announced the shocking information to write to balkanspress.com. According to him, from overheard a conversation between NATO officers it became clear that "it will be soon, on Thursday." Lazanski was allegedly at a luxury hotel in the Austrian capital, where there was also an informal meeting of senior NATO officers. He was next to a group of them and overheard fragments of conversation during the next major military conflicts in the world.


    http://www.blitz.bg/news/article/382925

    New Year's, drunken joke, and he disheveled?
  28. 0
    27 December 2015 17: 36
    That's about Anal Whiners .... Serbian, Montenegrin, Bulgarian and other Greek "brothers" - maybe not. There are enough of our own. Even at VO.
  29. +2
    27 December 2015 18: 20
    Quote: Platonitch
    From this, my soul somehow warms up !!!

    And the "partners" - it gets colder wassat
  30. +3
    27 December 2015 19: 43
    There are brains and hands in our defense industry. So we are happy and the enemies are afraid. hi
  31. 0
    27 December 2015 21: 19
    The first two sentences are wonderful. But not enough. The rest is all superfluous and far-fetched, such as not only two notorious phrases. I directly and don’t know what to plus, and what to discuss. Thanks to the people who managed to tell something about the main topic, continue and develop the discussion, which is interesting to read. But for such modest informative news, you can express a loud fi. Of course, I can’t put a minus, but a respected author ... Instead of an article, you can do just one name ..
  32. 0
    27 December 2015 22: 19
    Your idle talk is empty.
    Until she works on a flight or someone else whom Assad did not call into the sky of Syria, all this blah blah blah ........
  33. +1
    27 December 2015 22: 25
    All sorts of "beeches" are needed, all sorts of "beeches" are important! good
  34. 0
    27 December 2015 23: 06
    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    Yes, it seems that all childhood illnesses are behind and the last launches of the Bulava were successful, even with the salvo firing of 2 ICBMs on November 14. 2015 from the board of APRK "Vladimir Monomakh"


    I read somewhere that there were still comments on one of the two missiles at the final stage of the flight
  35. 0
    28 December 2015 05: 21
    I just want to say - "welcome" brothers in mind ... lol
  36. 0
    28 December 2015 05: 52
    time is urgent, this product immediately to the troops ...
  37. 0
    28 December 2015 07: 45
    the main thing that would have time to rearm !!!
  38. 0
    28 December 2015 08: 29
    / All this is good, enthusiasm rolls over. How about the material and technical supply of existing complexes and new ones? In terms of repair base is changing?
  39. 0
    28 December 2015 10: 50
    “The range of the C-300B4 is up to 350 km,” the general explained.
    But I wonder what AWACS range works for? Will these "up to 350 km" be enough to land it?
  40. +1
    28 December 2015 11: 47
    BUK has the very first probability of 0.7-0.8 on the plane. and for a single non-maneuvering plane and helicopter, only 1 missile was considered. When maneuvering and in interference 2. The launch interval of at least 2-3 s during the maneuver of the target was increased by calculation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"