The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad

72
Despite the readiness of Moscow to share information on the DAISH, the Pentagon does not intend to establish cooperation in Syria until the Kremlin changes its strategy regarding Assad, reports RIA News statement by the representative of the US military Michel Baldans.



On Friday, the head of the operational department of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Sergei Rudskoy, said that Russia "is ready to provide our partners with the coordinates of the ISIL facilities and is waiting for their mutual information on the infrastructure of terrorist organizations."

“The position of the Ministry of Defense has not changed. We do not intend to cooperate with Russia on Syria until Moscow changes its strategy to support Assad and instead focuses on IS, ”said Baldansa.

By the way, the military departments of the Russian Federation and France found a common language on this issue. As reported by the Russian Defense Ministry 23 December, the parties "agreed to exchange operational information to coordinate actions to more effectively defeat command posts, military equipment, warehouses, supply lines for militants and other infrastructure of ISIL in Syria."

The Russian ministry also noted that "following the meeting, a common understanding was confirmed that both Russia and France are seeking to preserve Syria as a single, secular, multi-religious state."
  • http://miroved.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +45
    26 December 2015 11: 52
    "The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh until it changes its attitude towards Assad," said curators of Daesh
    1. +13
      26 December 2015 11: 58
      Yes, they were already worn out with a change of power. that they are so attached to Assad) Assad to the bulb that the United States wants
      1. +26
        26 December 2015 12: 00
        The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against DAISH
        Of course they will not, because under the fire of the Russian VKS the innocent American taxpayers' money is dying. winked
        1. +6
          26 December 2015 12: 13
          The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until ...

          All military clearly.
          In the end, they said goodbye))) laughing
          Here are the goodies.
          As the Russian proverb says:
          - a woman with a cart is easier.
          1. +3
            26 December 2015 13: 11
            Quote: Temples
            In the end, they said goodbye)))

            -------------------------
            It seems that women's logic has penetrated into all spheres of the infantile will of the West.
            1. +4
              26 December 2015 13: 52
              Quote: Altona
              It seems that women's logic has penetrated into all spheres of the infantile will of the West.

              .. if only logic .. a vivid example is the Minister of Defense of Germany .. Ursula von der Leyen .. source: http://www.forbes.ru/forbes-woman/karera/249904-general-v-yubke-kak-mat-semerykh
              -detei-stala-zvezdoi-nemetskoi-politiki

              “Wow, this is a career! - Even the commander-in-chief of NATO forces in Europe, General Philip Breedlove, did not hide his enthusiasm and surprise when he heard the name of the new Minister of Defense of Germany. “As soon as I heard this news, I immediately typed her name on Google and was amazed at her outstanding biography.” Ursula von der Leyen’s nomination as Minister in December 2013 was a sensation even in progressive Germany, where women can serve in the army, and Chancellor Angela Merkel has been at the helm for eight years.
              Throughout the reign of Merkel, since 2005, von der Leyen - the mother of seven children and a doctor by training - worked in the federal government, but was more concerned with social issues. For example, the struggle to increase the record low birth rate and the introduction of more women in the top management of German companies.
              .. gynecologist .. laughing
              .. and, the commander of the United States Air Force, Deborah Lee James .. and, the general in the skirt of Peggy Combs, remember the story of the run of her subordinate men in high heels? ..http://topwar.ru/73791-amerikanskiy-general-zhenschina-prikazala-voennosluzhasch
              im-nadet-zhenskie-tufli-i-ustroit-kross-protiv-narusheniya-zhenskih-prav-v-armii
              .html
              ..
              For reference: the campaign “Walk (run) a mile in her shoes” for sexual equality in the USA is held for the 15 consecutive year, but the campaign was introduced for the first time in the US Armed Forces. Now Brigadier General Peggy Combs will definitely enter the annals of American military history ...

              laughing .. it's only the beginning .. laughing
              1. 0
                26 December 2015 16: 33
                The fact that people who are far from military affairs are increasingly being promoted to key posts in the military departments of Western countries is nothing strange.
                The general, whose interests he does not represent in his position, understands the consequences for the army of the decisions he makes. Before giving this or that order, it calculates the results based on its knowledge of the situation and the capabilities of subordinate units.
                The civilian relies on the advice of "consultants" to make decisions that fall within the competence of the military. And the main consultants, in such cases, are those who promoted to this position.
                It’s easy to manage and impose their interests in certain issues. Whether it’s supplies, weapons, or wars.

                The more civilian defense ministers there are in countries, the closer the world war is.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +1
                  26 December 2015 18: 25
                  Foreign
                  The more civilian defense ministers there are in countries, the closer the world war is.

                  Absolutely right! I also wrote earlier that the Minister of Defense of Germany, as a woman from civilians, is just like a nominee director in a company. In this case, in reality, other people — military specialists — rule, and she only with conviction voices and portrays to the public what these people require of her.
                  At the same time, Machiavellianism consists in the fact that those who really rule in secret in the country’s Defense Ministry are not visible to anyone, no one knows about them - and in the event of a war crime in the international arena, they can be guaranteed to really evade criminal liability in case of organizing an international tribunal. In this regard, the German Minister of Defense is just a stupid woman. However, very fanatical women are selected and nominated for such posts so that they DO NOT surrender their boss bosses in court.
        2. +5
          26 December 2015 12: 56
          Quote: Sid.74
          Of course they will not,

          How will it not be? They lie! There will be! They used our video footage of the strikes of our aerospace forces on the objects of the bearded, why not "cooperation"? laughing Plagiarism or power in the madhouse passed to the patients .... Zhenya, hi !
          1. +1
            26 December 2015 13: 01
            Quote: Tersky
            Will they also use our video footage of our VKS strikes on the objects of the bearded, than not "cooperation"?

            Victor, it's not so simple ... hi
            Quote: Dryuya2
            in fact, the interaction is proceeding according to the "full program".

            Comrade, right. Yes This is for us, the townsfolk, everything is simple and obvious. Nobody has yet canceled the undercover fight.
            Vot, curious article:Secret US contacts with the Assad regime
      2. +3
        26 December 2015 12: 12
        This mantra has already filled Oska, how much can you? did not try to think?
        1. +2
          26 December 2015 12: 25
          Quote: cniza
          This mantra has already filled Oska, how much can you?

          I think all these mantras for the media, but in fact the interaction is going on "in full".
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +3
        26 December 2015 12: 18
        They will not, and do not. There is no use in such cooperation. Some words about partnership and friendship. The interests of the country are more important.
      5. +9
        26 December 2015 12: 34
        Quote: Uranus
        Yes, they were already worn out with a change of power. that they are so attached to Assad) Assad to the bulb that the United States wants

        The United States on the international scene resembles a brother from the 90s. Fingers, a fan, a slate face, I want everything here, although yesterday they said something completely different. Even at 70-80, the United States didn’t have such fools like that now, but someday and bend your fingers into the point.
      6. +1
        26 December 2015 12: 35
        The main task of the United States is the change of power in Syria, for this they support ISIS.
        1. +2
          26 December 2015 12: 38
          Quote: akmalinin
          The main task of the United States is the change of power in Syria, for this they support ISIS.


          And the goal is to create chaos there, Assad is in the way.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      7. +1
        26 December 2015 12: 52
        Well, they don’t want a bun with butter, let them eat horseradish with mustard! hi
      8. +1
        26 December 2015 14: 33
        Assad - one of the main obstacles to the omnipotence of Daesh in favor of Fashington!
    2. +3
      26 December 2015 12: 01
      The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad

      And why should they cooperate with us, if all our data on ISIS, they can get from France - we are cooperating with her in this matter.
      1. +2
        26 December 2015 12: 13
        We do not intend to cooperate with Russia on Syria until Moscow changes its strategy to support Assad and instead focuses on IS, ”said Balda.

        It means that we are not on the path with accomplices of terrorism.
    3. +1
      26 December 2015 12: 11
      And we so dreamed about cooperation !!! We just dreamed about it! For many of us, this has become the meaning of life, and they !!! Downs.
      1. 0
        26 December 2015 13: 49
        And we so dreamed about cooperation !!! We just dreamed about it! For many of us, this has become the meaning of life, and they !!!
        And how we will live now after that I can’t imagine crying Correctly Lavrov said --- Morons b..d
    4. +1
      26 December 2015 12: 20
      Sith Lord (2) SU Today, 11:52 AM
      "The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh until it changes its attitude towards Assad," said curators of Daesh.
      .. like adult uncles in the Pentagon .a behave like moody Kids !! laughing
      Isn't it time for them to grow up ?????
    5. +1
      26 December 2015 15: 59
      The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad


      I directly see the whimpering Shoigu and Gerasimov, comforting him, say: "... come on, well, somehow ... let's try without the Americans ..."
  2. +3
    26 December 2015 11: 53
    "The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against ISIS"
    Well, God be with them! The main thing is not to interfere.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      26 December 2015 14: 22
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      "The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against ISIS"

      And why should the United States cooperate with the Russian Federation. And it is categorically harmful for us to cooperate with the United States. 2 of our corpse as a conscience or as a substitute for the conscience of Americans. Such allies should be taught on the stakes of wolf holes in Vietnam.
  3. +9
    26 December 2015 11: 53
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh ...

    But in case of victory over Daesh, he will surely ascribe this victory to himself.
    1. +1
      26 December 2015 12: 17
      But in case of victory over Daesh, he will surely ascribe this victory to himself.

      RT to help us.
  4. +7
    26 December 2015 11: 54
    This means the EMPIRE OF LIE will continue to feed the IG.
  5. 0
    26 December 2015 11: 55
    The Pentagon's best "friends" are the Russian army and navy.
  6. +2
    26 December 2015 11: 55
    It would be nice if our Defense Ministry sent the Pindargon an official package with the roots of a well-known agricultural culture, thereby expressing its attitude towards the "helpers". smile
    1. gjv
      0
      26 December 2015 12: 12
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      It would be nice if our MO sent Pindargon an official package with

      Gauges in all five angles.
      In Arlington City at Five Corners get Caliber, Michelle Lummoxnsa.
  7. 0
    26 December 2015 11: 55
    Take your slug toys ...
    And don't pee in my pot anymore. laughing
    Well, it’s direct, #only children, that Erdogan, that the Pentagon. recourse
  8. 0
    26 December 2015 11: 57
    Surprised merikatos! So it’s clear as God's day. Headless campaigns are getting dull and dull. fellow
  9. +1
    26 December 2015 11: 57
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad
    In a word, there will be no cooperation. Nobody expected anything else.
  10. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 00
    In all likelihood, our people will soon have a wonderful goal: "to hoist the banner of Victory over the Capitol." Because they got these tzatsi or Nazis, posing as "fighters for democracy", putting people with a slave psychology as their presidency, unleashing wars across the planet, killing people, hindering social progress, enemies of all truth, swindlers and bandits.
  11. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 02
    That is, the United States will continue to supply the "moderate opposition" with weapons and "accidentally" hammer the Syrian government troops, while Russia should ... what should it ??? To surrender Assad and leave Syria ???

    It would be nice if, after such pressure-statements, at least one coalition plane was shot down by Syrian air defense or aviation forces ... Ours DON'T do this ...
  12. +6
    26 December 2015 12: 05
    “The position of the Ministry of Defense has not changed. "We do not intend to cooperate with Russia on Syria until Moscow changes its strategy to support Assad and instead focuses on IS"

    Who would doubt how the mattresses would calmly watch so that the brainchild they created would be so ruthlessly destroyed by Russia, they certainly did not expect such massive and precision strikes from Russia.
  13. +4
    26 December 2015 12: 08
    I don’t think that the Russian Federation was counting on cooperation ... The Pentagon and the White House, first let them agree among themselves, but that something is storming them is not childish ...
  14. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 08
    Another blah blah. The United States will not cooperate as long as we are rivals in the international arena. Even if we take Assad out, there are plenty of other excuses. For what it is impossible not to love our "partners", so it is for their constancy. You always know that you don't have to expect good from them.
  15. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 09
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad
    Strict uncles scared. It can also be said of the Pentagon, until they change their attitude towards the DAISH accomplice (possibly even one of the main ones) Erdogan, there can be no cooperation and no market with them.
  16. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 09
    Forgot about the terrorist plane crash on the Pentagon in 2001; waiting for the ISIS to repeat the operation. Then they will see clearly.
  17. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 11
    That's right, you have to have striped ones, otherwise we were afraid that you would leave your child and we would have to consider you parents to be the lambs of God. And here your dull myopia or just a banal sense of exclusivity worked. And now, of course, it will be more difficult for us, but in the future the developer will work in the right direction and your EGO will stick to you at the fifth point.
  18. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 18
    Funny guys live under a mattress flag .. we like a bone in their throat. Let them choke. laughing
  19. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 21
    Change your attitude towards Assad, they tell us. They just took it, yes changed... We have a different attitude, if you give up your friends, then what should you call you now, that is, yourself? No, "Oh, West is West, East is East, and they will not leave their places,
    Until Heaven and Earth appear at the Last Judgment. "Rudyard Joseph Kipling.
  20. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 22
    “The position of the Ministry of Defense has not changed. We do not intend to cooperate with Russia on Syria until Moscow changes its strategy to support Assad and instead focuses on IS, ”said Baldansa.

    Those. Russia does not hammer these reptiles.
    It must be strengthened.
    Americans leaked their wards.
    Otherwise than that, it is not understood.

    Assad was taken out of brackets.
  21. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 23
    It is necessary to ban American planes from flying over Syria, and even more so shelling of Syria. Most often, the Americans fire at the Syrian army and thereby help ISIS. To warn them that Syria did not call them and all actions against Syria are aggression (attack) on Syria and bring down everything that will fly towards Syria.
    1. +4
      26 December 2015 12: 25
      Who is not with us is against us!
    2. cap
      0
      26 December 2015 12: 56
      Quote: Алексей_К
      To warn them that Syria did not call them and all actions against Syria are aggression (attack) on Syria and bring down everything that will fly towards Syria.

      I think it’s time for Assad to make such a statement.
      Let's see what he says after a trip to Iran. hi
    3. 0
      27 December 2015 05: 27
      Quote: Алексей_К
      It is necessary to ban American aircraft flying over Syria, and even more so shelling of Syria

      it’s easy to ban, only on these bans they spat on the high bell tower. Will they start to shoot down? So the answer gets no less. There will be no ceremony, no sanctions will be imposed on tomatoes ...
  22. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 26
    Pentagon-parent DAISH. Why should he fight with him?
  23. +1
    26 December 2015 12: 36
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad
    Bolda lick the Pentagon, Russia will destroy your wards, that is, DAISH. hi
  24. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 42
    We will ruin NATO from within !!! Whiners from the United States resemble a petty yard bully, who unexpectedly received a slope from a weak, as he thought, enemy.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 45
    A woman with a cart - and the wolves are full.
  27. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 49
    "The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh."
    What is there to discuss and break spears! A raven will not peck out a crow's eyes! This is our Russian, Taras Bulba, could say - "I gave birth to you, I will kill you," and the Americans are sentimental, you just look at the r.o.j. at their prez.ka.
  28. 0
    26 December 2015 12: 50
    After such "cooperation" the Turks shoot down our planes ....
  29. cap
    0
    26 December 2015 12: 51
    What can we say looking at the Pentagon spokesman Michelle Baldance?
    I definitely would not dare to "cooperate"
    1. 0
      26 December 2015 14: 29
      Quote: cap
      What can we say looking at the Pentagon spokesman Michelle Baldance?

      What is her place in the Yellow House, in ward No. 6
  30. 0
    26 December 2015 13: 05
    Quote: Sith Lord
    "The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh until it changes its attitude towards Assad" -

    They crushed Western politicians and the military. I remember the terry anti-communist and anti-Stalinist Churchill readily began to help the USSR in the fight against Germany. He did not change his views - we just had the enemy alone, the Nazis. Now the whole world is threatened by terrorism, and they are Assad-Assad. hi
  31. 0
    26 December 2015 13: 11
    They refuse. Well, okay.
    It is imperative to demand from the United States and its minions not to prevent us from working in the sky of Syria. As if without threats of closing the sky from unwanted coalition apparatuses.
  32. 0
    26 December 2015 13: 30
    They didn’t say anything new, they only once again proved that all this mess in the East was conceived for the rise of Islam against Russia. In order to once again sit out in the bushes pretending to be an ally with a knife in his sleeve. At the same time, smiling, and looking in the eyes, rob both warring parties.
  33. 0
    26 December 2015 13: 31
    good news
  34. 0
    26 December 2015 13: 57
    Russia will put on the Pentagon, until it ceases to poke its nose into the internal affairs of other countries. Pinocchio, ЕПРСТ.
  35. 0
    26 December 2015 14: 13
    “The position of the Ministry of Defense has not changed. We do not intend to cooperate with Russia on Syria until Moscow changes its strategy to support Assad and instead focuses on IS, ”said Baldansa.


    Surely a feminist, but why else is Assad so worried about her. wassat
  36. 0
    26 December 2015 14: 25
    What kind of collaboration? They created ISIS, and they will support him. The task is simple - to bring to power in Iraq and Syria their proteges and ranks of terrorists and for their secret support to be able to keep military bases there and control oil flows. What kind of collaboration? With whom? Does Libya not remind of anything? What about Iraq? What about Yemen? In Egypt, it did not work right away, but work is ongoing.
  37. Ria
    0
    26 December 2015 14: 35
    The French poodle will immediately deliver the operational information transferred to him to NATO. All of them at the same time - Merkel knocks on Putin, Hollande seems to have swung, but enthusiasm quickly faded, the United States gives Turkey operational information about Russian operations in Syria. What can you talk to them about? Russia does not have only friends, but even just decent "partners". Now the scheme from the movie "Once in America" ​​works in world politics. One big bandit controls the street, those who do not pay are destroyed. Until then, until someone is indignant and does not kill that very big bandit. But this is difficult to organize, so every little thing hides in the corners and does not get involved in a showdown, only as far as possible, podvyakat "big boss". But the string won't twist forever.
  38. 0
    26 December 2015 14: 39
    And how we still lived without Pentalgin! laughing
  39. 0
    26 December 2015 14: 40
    Dear forum users, okay, 404 wean her forgivably - without brains. But the mattress probably competes in absurdity. And this place on the ball is armed with atomic weapons ?????? Become a little scary. It is urgent to remove everything from their arsenals and not to allow them to any buttons anymore, otherwise God forbid any psaki or Kirby press something wrong with all the P.I.P. Pay attention to the name of the Balance. Do not expect anything good from this, much less from the bulldozer. Where they are found and by what principle they are selected remains a mystery.
  40. 0
    26 December 2015 15: 13
    went to the stump with their cooperation, which consists in a show-off struggle with those whom you cover ...
  41. 0
    26 December 2015 15: 31
    The Pentagon does not intend to establish cooperation on Syria until the Kremlin changes its strategy regarding Assad
    I didn’t understand something - the Pentagon determines America’s foreign policy ?! Or another excuse. Although no, here ours, in my opinion, were stuck. Why should the Pentagon dump us info if they don’t own normal info and don’t have a reason to give their wards to them? And they calmly take our information from the paddles, because they join the coalition under the leadership of the United States. Here is such a game with one goal.
  42. 0
    26 December 2015 15: 40
    So you want to throw something into the center of the Pentagon so that the infection coming from them no longer spreads around the world! angry
  43. bad
    0
    26 December 2015 16: 10
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad
    ... heh .. kill yourself ... with your head against the wall ... we put your opinion on it .. bully
  44. 0
    26 December 2015 17: 39
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until it changes its attitude towards Assad

    Given all the circumstances about the role of the United States in the tragedy of Syria, this phrase directly means the following:
    "The Russian Federation should not interfere with US interests in Syria, and then the Russian Aerospace Forces will be allowed to bomb several excavators."
  45. 0
    26 December 2015 19: 12
    That's where the democracy of words and deeds - Kerry, comes and declares one thing, some kind of BALDasan, does not know about it and declares another.
    A quality photo resembles a pocket in which you want to plant a ball for several kilotons.
  46. 0
    26 December 2015 19: 36
    Worse than the SNL war, only cooperation with them!
  47. 0
    26 December 2015 19: 52
    Quote: Temples
    The Pentagon will not cooperate with the Russian Federation in the fight against Daesh, until ...

    All military clearly.
    In the end, they said goodbye))) laughing
    Here are the goodies.
    As the Russian proverb says:
    - a woman with a cart is easier.

    The enemy of our enemy is our friend. Is not it?
  48. 0
    27 December 2015 00: 34
    Dear all these are US games, the position of just Moscow is completely incomprehensible, why we are negotiating and immediately declare a completely different position, we just need to wait for which side (for negotiations, against interaction with Russia), then make decisions, now they are simply trying to drive us by the nose, putting forward unattainable conditions and at the same time imitating constructive negotiations, and in both countries
  49. 0
    27 December 2015 00: 56
    As long as there is Assad, the Americans cannot bring their proteges to power. The goal is not an end to the war and a "good" president in Syria, but a large-scale war, but under the control of the United States, which is making "every effort" to end it.
  50. 0
    27 December 2015 01: 26
    Kerry arrived, "he hung up noodles that they agree with us, and about Assad too," again orally everything was resolved and, as it were, agreed. Kerry left, everything fell into place, the Americans were like "and we did not make an agreement about anything," and now we have to carry out a verbal agreement. Just like Gorbachev, in his time, he orally resolved "issues of uniting germanium". We united, but we didn’t subscribe to the rest: we don’t expand NATO ... and so on. Our brains are completely different from them. They have "democracy" - is to destroy 100 million of their Indians, well, further down the list to the present day.
  51. 0
    27 December 2015 04: 53
    Who needs “allies” who bomb hospitals?!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"