Military Review

The newest Su-35S fighters for the first time took to duty in the Far East

92
In the Eastern Military District, the modernization of the aviation fleet continues. So for the first time the newest multi-purpose fighters Su-35С, which should change the Su-27СМ, made their first duty on duty in the Khabarovsk Territory. RIA News gives the text of the message of the representative of the main defense department of the country:
The pilots of combat fighters will have to protect the airspace of the Far East. Duty on air defense will carry in turn several pairs of Su-35С.



The newest Su-35S fighters for the first time took to duty in the Far East


It is reported that for the first time in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, units of the Eastern Military District are equipped with modern Su-35C fighters.

In addition, the press service of the BBO reports that work has been done to modernize the MiG-31 aircraft. Aircraft equipped with the latest aviation "Stuffing."

From the report:
Having the newest aviation "stuffing" the aircraft became the next party in the process of re-fighter air regiment. Due to the on-board radio equipment and weapons of the new generation, the efficiency of the MiG-31BM has increased by X times in comparison with the MiG-31.


The specific segment of the growth of efficiency in the press service of the Eastern Military District is not reported.

Three MiG-31BMs arrived at the Central Corner military airfield near Vladivostok.
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru
92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Wiruz
    Wiruz 25 December 2015 17: 19 New
    +9
    And I, as a fool, expect that they will be transferred to Syria. And that on the pylons there will be something more interesting than the R-27 request
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 25 December 2015 17: 24 New
      16
      Quote: Wiruz
      And I, as a fool, expect that they will be transferred to Syria. And that on the pylons there will be something more interesting than the R-27 request



      But is the Su-30SM and S-400 m S-300F not enough for this?
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 25 December 2015 17: 32 New
        +7
        But is the Su-30SM and S-400 m S-300F not enough for this?

        Su-30 suits, R-27 - no yes
        1. Denis Obukhov
          Denis Obukhov 25 December 2015 17: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: Wiruz
          But is the Su-30SM and S-400 m S-300F not enough for this?

          Su-30 suits, R-27 - no yes



          Su-30SM is enough to cover attack aircraft and protect Syrian airspace.
        2. kil 31
          kil 31 25 December 2015 18: 38 New
          +2
          I have a question for those who know. It seems like they said a couple of months that they could not bring to mind, avionics and under them there is no weapons. Did they do it all, or is it just not the finishing touches waiting for them to be completed?
          1. Gardener91
            Gardener91 25 December 2015 21: 12 New
            +1
            The letter "C" always stood on transitional series, so everything is in perspective. Ksaty Mikoyan all serial with the letter "C", as a rule, were unsuccessful because they were "raw." Run the need for a safe concept of the state in a series of "adapters" , since you can only export the previous product series.
            1. SCHNIFER
              SCHNIFER 25 December 2015 21: 42 New
              +6
              MiG-31 B - production aircraft equipped podzapravki system in the air, arms became 1990 year;

              Mig-31 BC - upgraded to MiG-31B, not including post podzapravki in the air;

              MiG-31BM - upgraded model year 1998, modern fighter aircraft, designed specifically for the Russian Air Force. Before 2020 planned improvement in terms of radar detection range goals before 320 km and simultaneous tracking of up to 10 aircraft;

              MiG-31D - experimental model can carry anti-satellite missile 79M6 "Contact";

              MiG-31I - fighter that can launch a small spacecraft;

              MiG-31M - modernization of aircraft 1993 with enhanced radar, avionics and armament;

              MiG-31F - universal tactical fighter-interceptor designed to destroy ground targets (radically new equipment);

              MiG-31 PV - export model MiG-31BM;

              MiG-31E - export aircraft with lighter avionics;

              MiG-31DZ - production aircraft, which is equipped with a system podzapravki in flight (different from the MiG-31B home to the refueling boom, and some differences in the structure of the cab);

              MiG-31BSM - modernized fighter 2014 on the basis of the MiG-31BS podzapravki without rods in the air.
              Read more at: http://avia.pro/blog/mig-31-istrebitel-perehvatchik
              1. VOLOD
                VOLOD 26 December 2015 07: 55 New
                0
                refueling ha ha ha. don’t make fun of me lol
          2. Ros 56
            Ros 56 27 December 2015 15: 20 New
            0
            What are you like children. If something is shown or written in the media, then there is something new in the stash. You can’t crack like a gossip about everything on every corner.
        3. podgornovea
          podgornovea 25 December 2015 22: 11 New
          0
          Have you used P-27 yet? They did not live up to expectations?
      2. GSH-18
        GSH-18 25 December 2015 18: 54 New
        -6
        The newest Su-35S fighters for the first time took to duty in the Far East

        And for some reason I thought that our T-50s are the NEWEST fighters! But it turns out from it.
        But tady, therefore, the question is: Why have we already delivered our latest Su-35 fighters to Indonesia, and only after that to our Far East ??? belay
        1. Vladislav
          Vladislav 25 December 2015 20: 47 New
          -1
          Su-35 has not yet been delivered, the first in line - China
        2. ssergn
          ssergn 25 December 2015 20: 52 New
          +1
          What is it about? That is, we are armed with the T-50 (a prototype in fact) and the SU-35С? Or only SU-35S of the two above?
        3. clidon
          clidon 25 December 2015 20: 54 New
          0
          And what was actually delivered to Indonesia? Did you have time yesterday?
        4. WSW1WSW
          WSW1WSW 27 December 2015 15: 43 New
          0
          DEAR GSH-18!
          The T-50 is not the latest fighter, it is, so to speak, an EXPERIENCED aircraft. He is not in service. After all, the Su-27 was initially the T-10.
          As I understand it, the Su-35S is closest to the T-50. Most likely final in the general Su-27's family.
    3. Sergey K.
      Sergey K. 25 December 2015 17: 25 New
      +7
      Expensive pleasure for Syria such birds. The risk is very great to lose them having such "Friends" who supposedly "help" us there.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 25 December 2015 17: 33 New
        +1
        The risk is very great to lose them having such "Friends" who supposedly "help" us there.

        Imagine the risk of losing the Su-27CM3 or Su-30CM there is higher hi
        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 25 December 2015 18: 56 New
          +8
          Quote: Wiruz
          Imagine the risk of losing there the Su-27SM3 or Su-30SM above hi

          Su 30th and Su 35th themselves "lose" anyone with their nose in the sand. It is their enemies who are afraid of, and not vice versa.
      2. Sibiriya
        Sibiriya 25 December 2015 18: 01 New
        35
        worth seeing
        1. GSH-18
          GSH-18 25 December 2015 19: 22 New
          +4
          Quote: Siberia
          worth seeing

          This video should be placed on American sites. Maybe that’s useful. Although at the end of the video there is text for the dull! good
    4. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 25 December 2015 17: 39 New
      +6
      Chasing the F-16 may well be the Su-30.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. subbtin.725
      subbtin.725 25 December 2015 17: 41 New
      +9
      Quote: Wiruz
      And I, as a fool, expect that they will be transferred to Syria.

      Tea at the General Staff is not worse than us "strategists" are sitting.
      1. agent rossii
        agent rossii 25 December 2015 18: 19 New
        15
        how do they know at the general headquarters ......... here we know better from the couch. how ekperd sofa declare wassat soldier
      2. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 26 December 2015 05: 47 New
        0
        Quote: subbtin.725
        Tea at the General Staff is not worse than us "strategists" are sitting.


        Plus, a colleague. And in nipponium, I guess the hysteria started again. And you had to think with whom to be friends. Eastern District, it is toothy. This is for you, the Japanese, not to eat buns. The lessons have been learned, now we are the trainers ourselves.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. clidon
      clidon 25 December 2015 18: 11 New
      0
      First you need to officially adopt them.
    9. romõch
      romõch 25 December 2015 18: 35 New
      0
      Quote: Wiruz
      And I, as a fool, expect that they will be transferred to Syria. And that on the pylons there will be something more interesting than the R-27 request


      Hey hey, we have something to guard here, not everyone has moved to warmer climes smile
    10. Sweles
      Sweles 25 December 2015 18: 37 New
      +2


      it would be nice to provide maintenance in hangars for such equipment as su35, especially since there will not be many of these aircraft ...
      1. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 25 December 2015 20: 45 New
        +2
        Pictured EF-2000 Typhoon
        Quote: Sveles
        it would be nice to provide maintenance in hangars for such equipment as su35, especially since there will not be many of these aircraft ...

        This T-50 will not be much, because of their price. And the Su-30, Su-34, Su-35 can stamp the sea, since they are the workhorses (we don’t forget about the Su-25 and MiG-31, which they are modernizing, but alas, so far no new ones have been heard)
    11. NDR-791
      NDR-791 25 December 2015 18: 49 New
      0
      Tafay Kovova, nuzna to the most ff.f ... Language broke. FINALLY, the filling of peripheral points with modern weapons has begun. Still, anti-aircraft missile defense in the internal districts as the third and last frontier of defense ... and then everything that was filmed in 99 is not being taken in exchange, SAND wassat
    12. NEXUS
      NEXUS 25 December 2015 19: 52 New
      +3
      Quote: Wiruz
      And I, as a fool, expect that they will be transferred to Syria. And that on the pylons there will be something more interesting than the R-27 request

      Excuse me, why the SU-35th in Syria then? To give free rein to Syria, so you’ll drag everything into Syria, including Poplar and Yars ... why do you like small children "you want to drag everything in your mouth" and you want to bring everything to Syria? ISIS doesn’t have its own Air Force, and for NATO there are S-400, Moscow and SU-30.
    13. da Vinci
      da Vinci 25 December 2015 20: 28 New
      +1
      Sapienti sat - reasonably enough
    14. The comment was deleted.
    15. TSOOBER
      TSOOBER 26 December 2015 00: 43 New
      +2

      Here everything is visible in detail
    16. Ros 56
      Ros 56 27 December 2015 15: 16 New
      -1
      They’ll throw it, they won’t throw it, what will change, what’s the air battle there?
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 28 December 2015 17: 16 New
        0
        Minusovshik, you see a great specialist in aviation and its application.
  2. kimyth1
    kimyth1 25 December 2015 17: 20 New
    0
    good news!!! waiting for t-50 !!! good
  3. bad
    bad 25 December 2015 17: 23 New
    +4
    The pilots of combat fighters will have to protect the airspace of the Far East. Duty on air defense will carry in turn several pairs of Su-35С.
    +++ no comment good
  4. Yak-3P
    Yak-3P 25 December 2015 17: 24 New
    +3
    still bring and bring .. away from the eyes .. good luck flyers !!!
  5. TSOOBER
    TSOOBER 25 December 2015 17: 27 New
    11
    here is the best news for this year:
    -VKS of the Russian Federation received complexes that turn the Su-34 into an electronic warfare aircraft,
    The Radioelectronic Technologies Concern (KRET, part of Rostec) handed over to the Russian Ministry of Defense the first batch of stackable electronic warfare containers (EW) for Su-34 bombers, which turn them into special EW aircraft capable of protecting entire aviation groups, said Friday RIA Novosti First Deputy Director General of KRET Igor Nasenkov.

    All Su-34 aircraft transferred to the Russian Aerospace Forces are equipped with the Khibiny multifunctional electronic warfare system developed by KRET, which is responsible for personal protection. It significantly increases the survivability of the aircraft itself, but is not designed to cover air groups.

    "This year, KRET for the first time handed over containers to the Russian aerospace forces, the installation of which allows you to turn any Su-34 combatant aircraft into a special jamming aircraft in a matter of minutes, capable of effectively suppressing the electronic systems of anti-aircraft missile systems and AWACS-type early warning and control aircraft," - said Nasenkov.

    According to him, the entire air group covered by such an aircraft "will simply disappear from enemy radars."

    “The EW container occupies only one of the suspension points of the Su-34, and during the performance of a combat mission, this aircraft can combine jamming with its standard functions as a front-line bomber,” said the First Deputy Director General of KRET.
    -KRET in 2015 transferred to the Armed Forces 9 electronic warfare systems "Moscow-1"
    The Russian Armed Forces this year received nine of the latest complexes of automation equipment for units and subunits of electronic warfare (EW) "Moscow-1", which can discreetly detect enemy electronic weapons, the first deputy general director of the Radio-Electronic Technology Concern developed this system (KRET, part of Rostec) Igor Nasenkov.

    “KRET transferred nine complexes of automation equipment for the Moscow-2015 electronic warfare systems to the troops during 1. A distinctive feature of these systems is the ability to reconnaissance targets in passive location mode. This allows you to detect enemy electronic equipment without revealing your location,” said Nasenkov.

    This technology best meets modern requirements and, according to the independent American analytical center CSBA, poses a threat even to technically advanced US forces, the press service of KRET notes.

    The “stealth” of Moscow-1 is complemented by a high range of 400 km. This figure exceeds the launch range of modern anti-radar missiles, which can be aimed at electronic warfare systems controlled by Moscow-1. For example, the range of the main anti-radar missile The US AGM-88 HARM is almost four times smaller. As a result, its carrier will be detected and blocked before it can launch, "said Nasenkov.

    The Moscow-1 complex is interfaced with command posts and launchers of aviation and air defense.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 25 December 2015 18: 08 New
      -21
      These electronic warfare systems were tested on our equipment, and not on foreign ones, so it’s too early to talk about their effectiveness, the “Khibiny” complex stood on Su 24 in Syria but it didn’t help.
      1. TSOOBER
        TSOOBER 25 December 2015 18: 51 New
        12
        Where does infa come from? For the first time I hear! Pruff to the studio! I haven’t seen the Khibin on the Su-24 in Syria in any photo! Yes, I have 30,34 and I haven’t seen it in 24 on the photo! And yet, how will EW help against ICGS from a distance of 5 km? Please share! There are other systems against this! And Moscow-1 is a full-fledged group EW, and finally it will be possible to create groups to suppress and break through the adversary’s air defense, and this is just super! Maybe the army will get something like the special forces of the US Air Force Wild Weasels. It was high time!
      2. clidon
        clidon 25 December 2015 20: 13 New
        +1
        "Khibiny" are not integrated into the Su-24. They simply could not be there.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 25 December 2015 20: 30 New
          -5
          Strange, but they said that they put it on some - installation on the Su 24 is possible, although this EW costs like 10 guided air-to-ground missiles, but again the effectiveness of our EWs against foreign equipment has not been proved.
          1. clidon
            clidon 25 December 2015 20: 53 New
            +1
            They could not be put on "some" - the integration tasks on board are complex and it was not carried out on this plane. And why when there is a Su-34, their modernization was carried out according to the principle of "Schaub cheaper and reached."
            Well, yes, on the models, they were installed. )
          2. Bad_gr
            Bad_gr 25 December 2015 20: 56 New
            +1
            Quote: Vadim237
            but again, the effectiveness of our electronic warfare against foreign technology has not been proven.

            Well yes ....
            And then what was it ?:
            "" Khibiny "against" Aegis ". Return of the American destroyer to the Black Sea"
            http://weaponscollection.com/2015/03/07/hibiny-protiv-idzhisa-vozvraschenie-star
            ogo-znakomogo-v-chernoe-more.html
            http://topwar.ru/70310-hibiny-protiv-idzhisa-vozvraschenie-amerikanskogo-esminca
            -v-chernoe-more.html
            http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/48815
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 25 December 2015 22: 15 New
              0
              And here, the EW complex was definitely not there - they confirmed in the Moscow Region.
      3. Falcon
        Falcon 25 December 2015 20: 51 New
        +3
        Quote: Vadim237
        These electronic warfare systems were tested on our equipment, and not on foreign ones, so it’s too early to talk about their effectiveness, the “Khibiny” complex stood on Su 24 in Syria but it didn’t help.


        Hubs are not installed on Su-24 - this is only a project. There is no container for Su-24 itself and there is no corresponding avionics, for integration of the container in Su-24 there is also no.
        At the moment, there is a hut only for Su-34 and so far in a limited edition.

        And even if they stood, they did not help. Since they attacked with the AIM-9 missile with the infrared seeker! Rab only works against GOS with radar !!!

        1. Gardener91
          Gardener91 25 December 2015 21: 22 New
          0
          They could see if the infa in range to the target came from the RLPK, and not from the KOLS, and then, only in the review mode, and not at all in the tracking mode, in the capture, i.e., the GOS missile with an IR coordinator.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 25 December 2015 22: 25 New
          -1
          So it’s even worse - besides the fact that there is no electronic warfare on the planes, since there wasn’t a complex of emitting heat traps there - you definitely have to admit the “complete professionalism” of the leadership of our airborne forces and the economical defense of the Defense Ministry - this also concerns armored vehicles - this we have an army - everything is in Razdolbaisky, as it was and remains.
      4. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 26 December 2015 13: 41 New
        0
        Fifth column?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 27 December 2015 16: 48 New
          +1
          Twenty-fifth - called "Reality"
    2. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 25 December 2015 18: 36 New
      0
      This is old news
    3. quote
      quote 25 December 2015 19: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: TSOOBER
      TSOOBER BY Today, 17:27 New

      here is the best news for this year:

      Thank you! Today, super news! Something I did not know.
  6. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 25 December 2015 17: 28 New
    -17
    2 years almost flew around, for most cars 13 years old the overhaul resource has probably already been flown. And this is just a deep modernization of the Su-27, how much pain remains with the T-50 - think squeamish. The Su-34 passed the tests much easier after the “kick” from the Moscow Region in the mid-2000s, despite the fact that the manufacturer of the NAZ was at that time in a coma, unlike KnAAPO.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 25 December 2015 17: 36 New
      +3
      And this is just a deep modernization of the Su-27

      Modernization of the Su-27 is the Su-27SM, Su-27M, Su-27SM3. Su-35 has the same glider as the progenitor, but "inside" is a completely different machine.
      1. queen
        queen 25 December 2015 17: 43 New
        +5
        Quote: Wiruz
        Su-35 has the same glider

        Outwardly similar, but a completely different glider. There is no brake flap, the aerodynamics are different ...
    2. 1976AG
      1976AG 25 December 2015 17: 48 New
      0
      Tu-95 and B-52 are also not young, but this does not prevent them from effectively solving combat missions. The Su-27 has an excellent glider. Put new electronics and combat capabilities have grown many times. Correct solution. More to such machines!
    3. Pilot
      Pilot 25 December 2015 17: 53 New
      +8
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      think squeamish

      Don’t think better.
    4. Odysseus
      Odysseus 25 December 2015 17: 58 New
      +4
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      The Su-34 passed the tests much easier after the “kick” from the Moscow Region in the mid-2000s, despite the fact that the manufacturer of the NAZ was at that time in a coma, unlike KnAAPO.

      The Su-34 was developed back in the late 80s, the Su-35 had to be redesigned in relation to the Su-27M (first-generation Su-35). And then where did you get the idea that the Su-34 was easily tested? The first Su-34s were not operational for several years. There were also problems. In general, a work process is underway.
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      how much pain remains with the T-50 - think squeamish.

      Many, even more with a production base and service + repair base.
    5. Bad_gr
      Bad_gr 25 December 2015 21: 21 New
      +4
      Quote: Denis Obukhov
      And this is just a deep modernization of the Su-27, ...

      Upgrade, say ....
      - The engine is different,
      - a new airframe (with a large use of magnesium alloys, welding instead of rivets, etc., closer to the Su-37)
      - avionics is different,
      - The degree of longitudinal static stability of the Su-27 is negative and is 5% of the average aerodynamic wing chord (SAX) -
      Su-35 - brought up to 20%.

      And that
      Besides appearance, what do they have in common?
  7. 52
    52 25 December 2015 17: 38 New
    +4
    Good news! Operation began, the best way to treat “sores.” It’s time to change the 27th to his “son.” The more massive the series, the better, I remember, and the Su-27 at the beginning of its career also caused a lot of headache to ground personnel, but the series , mass, and a great machine in the end.
  8. gukoyan
    gukoyan 25 December 2015 17: 48 New
    +2
    Great news, because this is our best of the aircraft !!!)
  9. 76SSSR
    76SSSR 25 December 2015 17: 49 New
    0
    I review the triumphal flight of Sergei Bogdan on it in Le Bourget - beauty and greatness!
  10. Pilot
    Pilot 25 December 2015 17: 51 New
    0
    Three MiG-31BM arrived
    And that’s good.
  11. su163
    su163 25 December 2015 17: 56 New
    +2
    I plan on Tu 160 in Kazan, and when will product 021 be returned to us at KuAZ? Our handsome men ..
  12. Pilot
    Pilot 25 December 2015 17: 57 New
    +1
    Quote: 52gim
    Su-27 delivered a lot of headache to ground personnel

    Yes it was. Managed ...
  13. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 25 December 2015 18: 17 New
    0
    Russia perfectly demonstrates the excellent organization of work on re-equipping troops with new equipment. These aircraft will guard the sky for more than a dozen years until they are replaced by the T-50, MiG-41, etc.
    1. aborigine
      aborigine 25 December 2015 19: 35 New
      -1
      Yeah, Russia still only demonstrates 4 ++, and the Americans are already fighting on the 5th for a long time am
      1. 1976AG
        1976AG 25 December 2015 19: 43 New
        0
        Quote: aboriginal
        Yeah, Russia still only demonstrates 4 ++, and the Americans are already fighting on the 5th for a long time am


        What to do, 15 years of the collapse of the state could not but tell! However, we get out of the abyss! It is still unknown how the Americans would get out of this situation!
      2. Foxmara
        Foxmara 25 December 2015 20: 18 New
        +1
        Quote: aboriginal
        Yeah, Russia still only demonstrates 4 ++, and the Americans are already fighting on the 5th for a long time

        not Aboriginal people decide)) 5 they decided to apply only this year, before that they smeared and promoted. Meanwhile, the sores all swam out and swam out. As a result, 4+ may well make the top five .. at a much lower price. In fact, the five of them is at best the development of technologies, some of which we refused to use back in the USSR, at worst - a black hole for the budget
  14. KnightRider
    KnightRider 25 December 2015 18: 18 New
    +4
    Cool fighter! He only lacks new missiles ... When will they finish them?
    1. 52
      52 25 December 2015 18: 21 New
      +4
      Sawing, but as with the "Caliber", it will be a "pleasant surprise." laughing
      1. mav1971
        mav1971 25 December 2015 20: 17 New
        +1
        Quote: 52gim
        Sawing, but as with the "Caliber", it will be a "pleasant surprise." laughing


        30 years and 3 years? (namely, with caliber it happened) ...
        Better not talk about it. which is not a really good example.
        Caliber is a bad example. As if the idiots did not want to.

  15. sober
    sober 25 December 2015 18: 48 New
    +5


    This is more interesting than on TV !!!!!!!!
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. sober
    sober 25 December 2015 18: 56 New
    0
    I think it’s interesting to see

    the picture is squeezed
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 25 December 2015 19: 19 New
      +1
      Why Mig-35D (distant) double? Indeed, in theory, a single room has more space for fuel, while a double room has a large volume for a co-pilot and his life support.
      1. iouris
        iouris 25 December 2015 19: 28 New
        0
        Probably, the engines are more economical, the aerodynamics are improved, the capacity of the tanks and MiG has become statically unstable, like the Su-27.
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 25 December 2015 19: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: 1976AG
          Why Mig-35D (distant) double?
          Letter "D " means double. Range has nothing to do with it.
      2. Falcon
        Falcon 25 December 2015 20: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: 1976AG
        Why Mig-35D (distant) double? Indeed, in theory, a single room has more space for fuel, while a double room has a large volume for a co-pilot and his life support.


        From Mig-35 they plan to make a drummer. or fighter-bomber.
        2-th pilot performs the functions of an weapons operator. For example, OLS-K was first applied.

        If you need a fighter, not a drummer, then a single seat will do.
  18. RusGun4
    RusGun4 25 December 2015 19: 17 New
    0
    The Far East is developing, and it pleases.
  19. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 25 December 2015 19: 33 New
    0
    Yes, Sambic is handsome!
  20. rov81
    rov81 25 December 2015 19: 41 New
    +2
    Good news about good planes! It's time to update the park, it will be as a budget option on the less dangerous borders of the country, but for now let the expensive T-50 bring to mind.
  21. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 25 December 2015 20: 20 New
    0
    Quote: Siberia
    worth seeing

    God bless you and your iron birds!
  22. kapitan92
    kapitan92 25 December 2015 21: 40 New
    +7
    Quote: Bad_gr
    Quote: Vadim237
    but again, the effectiveness of our electronic warfare against foreign technology has not been proven.

    Well yes ....
    And then what was it ?:
    "" Khibiny "against" Aegis ". Return of the American destroyer to the Black Sea"
    http://weaponscollection.com/2015/03/07/hibiny-protiv-idzhisa-vozvraschenie-star

    ogo-znakomogo-v-chernoe-more.html
    http://topwar.ru/70310-hibiny-protiv-idzhisa-vozvraschenie-amerikanskogo-esminca

    -v-chernoe-more.html
    http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/48815

    What can "Khibiny"

    Aviation systems of electronic countermeasures are considered an important element that increases the chances of survival of aircraft in modern combat conditions. The principle of operation of the EEDC is based on the direction finding of the probe signal of the radiation source (enemy radar) with subsequent distortion of the parameters of the reflected signal in order to:

    - Delays in the detection of the aircraft KREP as an object of attack for the enemy;
    - masking a true object against a false one;
    - difficulties in measuring the distance to the object, its speed and angular position;
    - degradation of the tracking mode “on pass” when scanning the radar antenna beam;
    - increasing the time and difficulty of capturing an object during the transition to the mode of continuous radio direction finding.

    It is impossible to “cut down” the enemy’s radar using the Khibin CREAP (this task is not even set), but, acting on a local scale, it is quite possible to turn the “drying” into a “difficult target” by giving the pilots several minutes to complete the task aviation and air defense of the enemy.

    Now about how all this relates to the case of “Donald Cook.” The answer is no way!

    KREPI “Khibiny” is not installed on Su-24 airplanes (silent scene). The complex is intended only for the new Su-34 tactical bomber (mentioned containers L175В, delivery of 92 kits, according to the contract of the Ministry of Defense of 14.01.2013). A variant of this station KS-418E for export Su-24МК and МК-2 did not go into the series, the last time he was seen at the stand of the MAKS air show in the middle of 2000-x.

    For effective work, “Khibiny” does not need to fly up to the enemy’s radar. Radar output power inversely proportional to the fourth power of the distance. And if at 200 km distance there is still a chance to distort the signal and “deceive” the Aegis destroyer radar, then it will be extremely difficult to do this close: powerful signals will quickly reveal the true position of the bomber and then the pilots will not expect anything good.
    1. Bad_gr
      Bad_gr 25 December 2015 21: 51 New
      -1
      In fact:
      There was “Donald Cook”, who had sailed into the Black Sea, as well as Su-24, which ironed this ship as he wanted. After that, “Cook” rushed to Romania and from there threw a tantrum.
      I repeat the question:
      What was it ?
      1. podgornovea
        podgornovea 25 December 2015 22: 17 New
        +2
        It was a fairy tale! There was no confirmation of allegedly craphering American stokers with a cookie. There was only information that the "Khibiny" were working with the Su-34, and not with the Su-24, the onboard equipment of the latter "a little bit" does not allow him to work with this system .
        1. Bad_gr
          Bad_gr 25 December 2015 22: 39 New
          -2
          Quote: podgornovea
          It was a fairy tale!

          That is,
          Cook didn’t swim in the Black Sea?
          1. clidon
            clidon 25 December 2015 22: 52 New
            +1
            I went in. And there were even overflights. And then an article appeared that after these overflights some sailors ran to psychologists and left the service, and Cook himself fled to the Mediterranean Sea (although in fact he participated in exercises with the Romanians for another two weeks) This is not an official source confirmed.
            Apparently, the author (s) himself (mim) seemed unconvincing that the NAVY sailors were "fleeing" the ship after a simple flight around it with airplanes, and soon an "extended" version with "Khibiny" and "burned-down destroyer electronics" appeared. )
        2. zekaze1980
          zekaze1980 25 December 2015 22: 47 New
          0
          To this tale, even an article was on this site and not only here.
          Someone will clarify the situation with the American "turn" and our Su-24?
          1. 1976AG
            1976AG 26 December 2015 00: 09 New
            -1
            Quote: zekaze1980
            To this tale, even an article was on this site and not only here.
            Someone will clarify the situation with the American "turn" and our Su-24?


            Watch a documentary about the return of the Crimea, everything was explained there.
        3. Shark Lover
          Shark Lover 26 December 2015 03: 05 New
          0
          Then why is it that all that is written here is not fairy tales?)))))
      2. zekaze1980
        zekaze1980 25 December 2015 22: 29 New
        0
        Experts !!!?, I'm also interested in identity!
  23. Neko75
    Neko75 25 December 2015 21: 57 New
    0
    There would be more such news, and often news in the future tense ... It will be handed over, undergoing tests, will be equipped, etc.
  24. Avantageur
    Avantageur 25 December 2015 22: 27 New
    -1
    The newest Su-35S fighters for the first time took to duty in the Far East

    Well, everything, for the airspace of the Far East, I am completely calm ...

  25. Sultan Babai
    Sultan Babai 25 December 2015 23: 54 New
    0
    Krasava is a plane, and in the Far East they are just right, so that all sorts of grandchildren of the samurai, the territories did not try to redraw them ...
  26. ser-pov
    ser-pov 26 December 2015 00: 05 New
    0
    It’s only a shame that this miracle could fly already in the 90s, but it appeared only now ...
  27. valiant71
    valiant71 26 December 2015 00: 13 New
    +1
    Here's another stunned !! http: //maxpark.com/community/8/content/4903869ь !!!!
    But understand. We scold the F-35. but there are already about 200 of them. And they will still be with the vertical. And here we gave pieces of 5 Su 35 and joy full pants !!! And F-22 fly. Bitterly......
    1. BABAY22
      BABAY22 26 December 2015 00: 54 New
      +1
      Do you offer us to cry?
      What a sorrow! 5 new Su-35s entered the database! Sob sob. crying crying
    2. Avantageur
      Avantageur 26 December 2015 01: 09 New
      0
      Quote: valiant71
      but there are already about 200

      Yes, at least 300. The main thing is who has the S-400. We have never been aggressors, but for defense, and these SAMs are enough good
      1. BABAY22
        BABAY22 26 December 2015 01: 27 New
        0
        But I'm interested. Why does everyone think that the Russian army is needed only for defense?
        Well, for example, the adversaries attacked us from across the ocean, we repulsed their first and second blow, we ground their axes with our s-1 and s-2, the adversary was exhausted. What's next?
        And then, by all the rules of military art, you should finish off the aggressor in his lair.
        Now it is hardly possible. But in the future, this needs to come.
        PS. Although the devil knows what kind of plans are in the folders of special importance in the armored safes of Gene. Headquarters of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
        1. Avantageur
          Avantageur 26 December 2015 01: 51 New
          0
          Quote: BABAY22
          Well, for example, the adversaries attacked us from across the ocean, we repulsed their first and second blow, we ground their axes with our s-1 and s-2, the adversary was exhausted. What's next?

          It is unlikely that there will immediately be something serious for us. Few people can openly attack us, yet there is potential, including nuclear. Now they will stealthily poison all sorts of viruses, different microbes, indulge in temperature, and even a lot of all sorts of shit can be presented. Not in the open, they will not ...
          1. BABAY22
            BABAY22 26 December 2015 02: 38 New
            0
            Quote: Avantageur
            It is unlikely that there will immediately be something serious for us

            So then it is. But if the Americans had been President Putin 2 years ago, it is not a fact that the 6th fleet would not have looked into the Black Sea at the request of the "legitimately elected president" Turchinov. And two Putin in one sea would definitely fit.
            And God knows what would happen next ...
            And so Obama chose to prosrt Crimea, which was practically already in their hands.
            1. Avantageur
              Avantageur 26 December 2015 10: 22 New
              0
              Quote: BABAY22
              But be with the Americans 2 years ago, President Putin

              In the states, the president, as you know, does not decide anything on his own, even if you put a senator, Russophobe McCain, he will dance to the tune of someone else, to the tune of Jewish clans like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Morgana, Saxony, Kuna, etc. etc. So, by definition, there will be no president like Putin.
  28. vinitskij2016
    vinitskij2016 26 December 2015 04: 14 New
    +2
    It turns out interesting - the news and the article that the Su-35S aircraft took up combat duty, but almost no comments about it. They talk about everything: "Khibiny", Caliber, Su-24, F-35, fleet, Turchinov, etc. ... And even more interesting are the statements about the strategy and the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, which are more like a story from a book with a genre "space wars of the future." I'd like to ask a simple question about what relation a person has to the army (I’ll write right away that I don’t have anything personal). Well, for example, a person discusses, gives advice on how to build a multi-storey building, but doesn’t even have the smallest building education ... Further on the topic of the article. To date (according to my calculations) 41 aircraft have been handed over. Of these, 10 in the GLIC and the pulp and paper industry (they are also the first ten production ones) and 24 aircraft in 23 IAPs (a / e Demghi) were transferred at the end of 2013 and the beginning of 2014. In 2015, 7 aircraft were handed over (if someone has a friend, correct the information, thank you in advance), namely, on July 16, two aircraft (w / n 01, 02 - red, light camouflage color, deployment location 23 IAP), at the end of October and at the beginning of November, four planes (b / n 03, 04, 05 and 06, in light camouflage, the location is not known, but on November 27 they arrived at the 116th pulp and paper mill in the city of Astrakhan and are supposed to be designed as for South Eastern Military District), one was transferred on November 26 unit (b / n and location is not known, but it can be assumed, b / n 07, in light camouflage, for 23 IAPs. From which it follows that at the moment there are 27 Su-35S in combat units and all of them in 23 IAP Ksati, on the video from the news block, shows airplanes with b / n 01 and 07, deliveries of 2015. The start of combat duty is certainly good, here are the protection of the borders and the constant practice of the crews. It is interesting how far the planes fly from what weapons are on board.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 26 December 2015 13: 02 New
      0
      Quote: vinitskij2016
      and what weapons are on board.

      R-27T / ET, R-73, RVV-MD.
      Quote: vinitskij2016
      I wonder how far from a / e planes fly

      Depending on where they are on duty, what specific tasks they perform. No one can say about this. But potentially the range of the Su-35 is large.