Military Review

The rate of contract recruitment in 2016 will be reduced in accordance with the previously approved plan.

33
In summing up the year, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced that they were fulfilling plans to recruit military personnel in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on a contract basis. Colonel-General Viktor Goremykin, head of the personnel department of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, noted that over the 2015 year a contract with the Ministry of Defense was signed by over 80 thousand people. And for the first time the number of contract servicemen in the Armed Forces exceeded the number of recruits. RIA News cites the statement of General Goremykin:


This year we reached the figure that was determined by the May presidential decrees - 352, thousands of servicemen. Next year we will select thousands for military service under the 31,2 contract.


As can be seen from the statement, the rate of recruitment of contract personnel will be significantly reduced. This is connected with the plans that were previously approved and with the "fullness" of the troops by the personnel. So, according to Viktor Goremykin, at the moment the number of Russian troops is up to 92% of the optimal composition.

Igor Goremykin:
Across the country, 81 is currently running a permanent selection point for contract soldiers, and by 1 in January 2016, two new ones will open - in Kandalaksha and Patriot Park in the Moscow Region. This amount is still enough.


The rate of contract recruitment in 2016 will be reduced in accordance with the previously approved plan.


The Defense Ministry noted that the increase in the number of those who want to sign a contract for service is also connected with the material support of a soldier. One of the attractive provisions - the possibility of obtaining a preferential mortgage loan for the military.
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The black
    The black 24 December 2015 15: 37
    +7
    ...and this is good. I hope this will allow for a better selection of candidates.
    1. Boos
      Boos 24 December 2015 15: 46
      12
      In a normal state, all men who pass through health should serve ... For each of the citizens should be able to repulse the enemy, both external and internal.
      Quote: Black
      ...and this is good. I hope this will allow for a better selection of candidates.
      1. The black
        The black 24 December 2015 15: 48
        +1
        Of course they should, but combat units should consist of contract soldiers ...
        1. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 24 December 2015 20: 54
          +3
          Quote: Black
          Of course they should, but combat units should consist of contract soldiers ...


          Colleague, but what if it’s really war? And all combat units from contract soldiers, where to take the mobilization reserve. The territory of our country is so huge that we can’t do it alone with contractors. For us, the mixed principle of manning the Army is still more optimal. hi
          1. The black
            The black 25 December 2015 06: 59
            +2
            Read carefully. I am NOT against conscription service. I only think that professionals should fight in hot spots .... well, if there is a war, then a general (or partial) mobilization is declared and then those who served in the army on conscription become general order. soldier
      2. novobranets
        novobranets 24 December 2015 15: 59
        +5
        Quote: Boos
        so to the inside.

        Well, mother-in-law, beware. am
      3. veksha50
        veksha50 24 December 2015 16: 15
        +2
        Quote: Boos
        In a normal state, all men passing through health should serve ...



        But no one cancels the call - and thank God ... Every man should have at least a minimum knowledge of military affairs, at least be able to handle an automatic machine gun, a pistol and grenades ...
        However, you won’t get much professionalism in a year and a half, and the equipment and weapons went very serious, requiring skills and abilities ...

        So both categories are needed - both conscripts and contract soldiers ...
      4. Samurai3X
        Samurai3X 24 December 2015 17: 38
        +3
        Oh yes ... Because when the time comes for strong changes, when the enemies will actually be at the helm, the people will take up arms and throw off the adversary, along with the army. It happens so all the time!
        PS The call (1-3 of the year of service) was needed for a huge amount of cannon fodder, which, if something happens, can be quickly collected, armed with something and launched against the advancing enemy. In modern conditions of military operations against great powers, is there a place for ordinary military operations in the event of a full-scale war?
        1. Max T.
          Max T. 24 December 2015 19: 56
          +2
          Just now, a conscription kit is needed to give basic concepts about gun ownership and the basic elements of tactics. Where did the contractors come from? What do they themselves evolve?
          1. Samurai3X
            Samurai3X 25 December 2015 13: 13
            0
            Does religion interfere with going to a contract right away in 18?
            Another thing is that if there is no call, men can completely turn into amoeba. They will still be disgusting military personnel. I have enough stories from former teachers of the military department. How they suffered in the Northern Fleet with conscripts. Now for most of the troops needed professional soldiers / sailors. High-class professionals become a minimum after 3-4 years of service. Given modern weapons, then most likely all 5.
            So you need to reform the call system. So that this year there will be a specific brainwashing and a little re-education + some basics of military service + understanding how hard it is sometimes to pull a military strap.
    2. vkl-47
      vkl-47 24 December 2015 16: 15
      +4
      if a person wants to serve, let him serve. And in the village, such gouges do everything for good. You would only go home to your mother’s bosom. Whoever said in the 90s that 80000 would come to the army voluntarily would think they were crazy.
  2. sever.56
    sever.56 24 December 2015 15: 42
    +8
    Professional contractors are definitely needed. But we must not forget about conscription. This is a future reserve in case a real threat of war arises. Even if they serve for a year, they nevertheless acquire good skills and knowledge. And men are becoming more responsible. You can't push the boys away from the "deadline" if they want to serve.
    1. The black
      The black 24 December 2015 15: 49
      +1
      Nobody argues with this ...
  3. Massik
    Massik 24 December 2015 15: 45
    +2
    Hehe, and with us, in part, 70% of double basses in 2016 leave and are not going to renew ...
    1. The black
      The black 24 December 2015 15: 47
      +2
      I don’t know about you, but in our military enlistment office there is a queue of people who want to.
    2. moskowit
      moskowit 24 December 2015 15: 59
      0
      Well, it turns out, though, somewhere in the middle ...
    3. veksha50
      veksha50 24 December 2015 16: 17
      0
      Quote: Marssik
      Hehe , and with us, in part, 70% of double basses in 2016 leave and are not going to renew ...


      And why is it malicious to rejoice?

      PS Hehe - there is already skepticism, irony, malice ...
      1. Massik
        Massik 25 December 2015 18: 01
        0
        Quote: veksha50

        And why is it malicious to rejoice?

        PS Hehe - there is already skepticism, irony, malice ...
        On the one hand, people who came not to serve but to earn money are leaving. On the other hand, the conditions are really not sugar, but they don’t pay money as before.
    4. KUOLEMA
      KUOLEMA 25 December 2015 10: 50
      0
      do not want to go to Syria for Shoigu radishes?
  4. andr1966a
    andr1966a 24 December 2015 15: 54
    +9
    Why rejoice? Do you think they are going to the service at the call of the heart or from great patriotism? Everything is much simpler. There is practically no work and no prospects for a citizen. Here and my children and the children of my friends who went through health, went to serve under a contract.
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 24 December 2015 16: 21
      0
      Quote: andr1966a
      Do you think they are going to the service at the call of the heart or from great patriotism? Everything is much simpler. There is practically no work and no prospects for a citizen



      Hmm ... And you think in the USA - not the same basically reasons push to contract service ???

      Only there is one more plus: if the contractor wants to study (if he also serves normally), then the Pentagon will also pay for his studies ...

      At the call, too, even in Soviet times, not everyone happily marched, there were those who tried to get rid of the army by various methods, mainly by entering universities that have military departments ...
      But by the same appeal - you wanted - did not want, everyone served ...
      1. andr1966a
        andr1966a 24 December 2015 17: 07
        0
        Quote: veksha50
        Quote: andr1966a
        Do you think they are going to the service at the call of the heart or from great patriotism? Everything is much simpler. There is practically no work and no prospects for a citizen



        Hmm ... And you think in the USA - not the same basically reasons push to contract service ???

        Only there is one more plus: if the contractor wants to study (if he also serves normally), then the Pentagon will also pay for his studies ...

        At the call, too, even in Soviet times, not everyone happily marched, there were those who tried to get rid of the army by various methods, mainly by entering universities that have military departments ...
        But by the same appeal - you wanted - did not want, everyone served ...

        What a habit of comparing Russia with mattresses or geyevropa.I thought it was the privilege of our politicians and allegarchs. We live in RUSSIA and we have our own culture. And in the USSR, I don’t know who mowed from the Army. In my environment there were none
  5. novobranets
    novobranets 24 December 2015 15: 57
    0
    And what is it, in the photo, guys in boots? Now in the army you will not find boots in the afternoon with fire. Squeaky contract fashion?
    1. Bassoon
      Bassoon 24 December 2015 16: 37
      0
      Just an archive photo. No more. Although when I was at the GSP (July 2011), I saw one fighter wearing a Yudashkin "figure" (which has a shoulder strap on the belly) and wearing kirzach. Some soldiers were still wearing flora.
  6. avva2012
    avva2012 24 December 2015 15: 58
    0
    Is it not only those who, after an emergency, are recruited exclusively for a contract?
    1. The black
      The black 24 December 2015 16: 04
      +1
      Quote: avva2012
      Is it not only those who, after an emergency, are recruited exclusively for a contract?
      You can sign after three months "deadline"
      1. Egevich
        Egevich 24 December 2015 20: 52
        0
        Quote: Black
        Quote: avva2012
        Is it not only those who, after an emergency, are recruited exclusively for a contract?
        You can sign after three months "deadline"


        after 10 months of military service, you can write a report on the conclusion of a contract ... not earlier ... at least in the army ... as in the BB, I don’t know ...
        with a service life of 2 years, the contract could be concluded after half the term, i.e. in a year ... for those who were called for a year, i.e. conscripts after college, six months later ...
    2. Evgeny Khokhlov
      Evgeny Khokhlov 24 December 2015 16: 38
      0
      possible without urgency.
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 24 December 2015 18: 18
        0
        Can for whom?
        1. The black
          The black 25 December 2015 07: 02
          +1
          You can .... for example, for those who have reached the age of 27 and have not served legally in the army .... wink .... by the way, according to the law, FOREIGNERS can also serve in the Russian army hi
  7. Kolka82
    Kolka82 24 December 2015 16: 00
    +1
    Quote: andr1966a
    Why rejoice? Do you think they are going to the service at the call of the heart or from great patriotism? Everything is much simpler. There is practically no work and no prospects for a citizen. Here and my children and the children of my friends who went through health, went to serve under a contract.

    That's it, I expressed my opinion - and on you "-". I support you with a plus sign.
  8. moskowit
    moskowit 24 December 2015 16: 02
    0
    In general, that is, there is open data on the occupancy or popularity of VUs among contractors?
  9. vmo
    vmo 24 December 2015 16: 03
    +1
    At the end of it, and it pleases !!!
  10. sleeping sayan
    sleeping sayan 24 December 2015 16: 38
    +1
    Money is running out, here is the rate of recruitment and falling.
  11. starchina pv
    starchina pv 24 December 2015 17: 08
    0
    equipment, but no one canceled the infantry !!!
  12. David 2633
    David 2633 24 December 2015 19: 15
    +1
    I don’t know how now in my time, the overwhelming majority of contractors wanted to either terminate the contract or serve without renewing, but how many SOCHNIKI and dead souls could not be counted in order to join the battalion from other baht and the soldiers drove their mouths to form.
  13. Micross
    Micross 25 December 2015 01: 01
    0
    In a year, what can be learned there! Return 2 years !!!