50-s archival materials published in the USA, telling about the targets chosen by the Pentagon for a nuclear attack

63
The American Archives Administration first published a list of potential objects compiled in 1956 g that should be destroyed by nuclear weapons in the event of a global conflict, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to The New York Times.

50-s archival materials published in the USA, telling about the targets chosen by the Pentagon for a nuclear attack


“The targets for American atomic bombs are divided into several categories. First of all, it was supposed to destroy 1100 military airfields in the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries, so that Soviet bombers could not rise to strike back (there were no intercontinental ballistic missiles yet). The second in importance were government and industrial facilities, energy complexes, ”the newspaper writes.

According to the plan of the US Strategic Aviation Command, "it was supposed to drop 179 atomic bombs on Moscow, on Leningrad - on 145, on East Berlin - on 91".

"At that time, the United States had a huge advantage over the USSR in the nuclear arsenal - about 10 times," said Matthew McKinsey, director of the nuclear program at the Council for the Protection of Natural Resources. “The combined power of American atomic bombs was estimated at 20000 megatons.”

“Published" atomic audit "frankly terrible. But it’s good that this document was published at a time when fewer and fewer Americans are aware of the terrible power of nuclear weapons, ”said Steven Schwartz, an independent expert on nuclear weapons. “We knew the general contours of the atomic war, which had been planned for several decades, now the details are becoming known. Published document can be considered historybut the weapon itself, unfortunately, is still a reality. ”
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    24 December 2015 12: 38
    they had such "peace-loving" plans ... thank gods that planet Earth did not feel our "nuclear exchange of pleasantries" with theirs
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 12: 39
      Quote: Sasha 19871987
      these are their "peace-loving" plans ...

      Yeah, peacekeepers damn it. All would mattresses to blame others on others laughing
      1. +15
        24 December 2015 13: 04
        They wanted to drop a bomb peacefully and in my native Blagoveshchensk what burn them in hell am ! Oh, in vain Boriska dispersed our 27th taxiway, now everyone is building the East there, and there were 60 mines soldier , he lived in Orlin, nostalgia what ,when divisions and regiments were criminally destroyed right in front of our eyes, who would be responsible for this - no one request ,it's a pity! hi
    2. +22
      24 December 2015 12: 43
      liberal mode on you do not understand! The Americans want us well. These were democratic bombs. They just wanted to destroy the evil scoop for our own good. You just Kiselev, along with Putin brainwashed !! 11 liberal mode off
      1. +2
        24 December 2015 13: 05
        It's sarcasm?
      2. +1
        24 December 2015 14: 35
        Quote: Chekyst
        liberal mode on you do not understand! The Americans want us well. These were democratic bombs. They just wanted to destroy the evil scoop for our own good. You just Kiselev, along with Putin brainwashed !! 11 liberal mode off


        Bravo!!!!!! I was waiting for a "peaceful" bombardment ... so that the scraps of the "scoop" would peel off my skin along with the meat. Here is the "peaceful atom". Didn't wait. Sadness laughing
        1. 0
          24 December 2015 18: 02
          Quote: meriem1
          Bravo!!!!!! I was looking forward to a "peaceful" bombing

          Damn, but not on the Volkhov request
          single bomb
          And I was so proud in childhood that we are so important that we will be bombed in the first place.
          Disappointment. And we were just swollen from our importance feel
          Americans - Ph.D.
          Spoiled all childhood memories. angry
          1. +2
            24 December 2015 18: 11
            Quote: atalef
            Americans - Ph.D.


            you think non-politically (Comrade Saakhov laughing ) why are you Sanya so about an ally .. Hello hi
            1. 0
              24 December 2015 18: 15
              Quote: vorobey
              Quote: atalef
              Americans - Ph.D.


              you think non-politically (Comrade Saakhov laughing ) why are you Sanya so about an ally .. Hello hi

            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            24 December 2015 18: 13
            Quote: atalef
            on the Volkhov neither
            single bomb
            And I was so proud in childhood that we are so important that we will be bombed in the first place.
            Disappointment. And we were just swollen from our importance

            Sasha. Consider that your wish has already been fulfilled. Yes We will not let your children's complexes come true. Guarantee. Moreover, you are swollen again ...
            Sholom hi countryman ... drinks
            1. +1
              24 December 2015 18: 16
              Quote: Angry Guerrilla
              Sasha. Consider that your wish has already been fulfilled. We will not let your children's complexes come true. Guarantee. Moreover, you are swollen again ...
              Sholem, countryman.

              At the brah.
              The Volkhov can already be bombed, I'm not there laughing
              1. 0
                24 December 2015 18: 28
                Quote: atalef
                The Volkhov can already be bombed, I'm not there

                M-yes ... Sasha! It's time to turn on! Yes What nna Volkhov ??? Take it closer!wassat
              2. The comment was deleted.
          3. 0
            25 December 2015 14: 04
            Quote: atalef
            Quote: meriem1
            Bravo!!!!!! I was looking forward to a "peaceful" bombing

            Damn, but not on the Volkhov request
            single bomb
            And I was so proud in childhood that we are so important that we will be bombed in the first place.
            Disappointment. And we were just swollen from our importance feel
            Americans - Ph.D.
            Spoiled all childhood memories. angry


            Do not worry so wink

            Or a cloud would cover ... Or a little radioactive drink
      3. +2
        24 December 2015 16: 33
        Quote: Chekyst
        You do not understand! The Americans want us well. These were democratic bombs.

        they have not gone far after 56

      4. 0
        24 December 2015 18: 01
        Quote: Chekyst
        You do not understand! The Americans want us well.

        I don’t remember who said it: "The phrase -" we only want the best for you "is usually pronounced in a very angry and hysterical tone."
      5. 0
        24 December 2015 18: 58
        Liberal mode, patriotic mode ... why agitation. Yes, the work of the men is routine, according to the safety technique - to plan. You might think that nothing of the kind has been done and is not being done in our General Security Department (remember the "accidentally leaked" radioactive torpedoes). All of them, both we and them, would at least be retired due to inconsistency, if nothing destructive was planned, but not in the only version. Moreover, all these "drop shots" became known almost from the day they appeared. And already eleven times this information was used by Soviet propaganda.
    3. +3
      24 December 2015 12: 45
      But what about the target category of civilians ??
      1. +5
        24 December 2015 13: 10
        I love Amersky journalists. Where is the mention of Kiev, Kharkov, etc. etc. Belarusians understand. As I understand it, it’s not worthwhile to clarify the desire to hit Ukraine and the Baltic republics.
        1. +1
          24 December 2015 17: 58
          Interestingly, the map above shows that one of the goals was Warsaw. But what about the Poles, kissing the ass American booby? Will they really say that the United States wanted to deal with them on the principle that it beats, then it loves? Or would a democratic nuclear bomb selectively destroy only advocates of totalitarianism, leaving the true adherents of democracy alive? what
          1. 0
            25 December 2015 14: 06
            Quote: Minstrel
            Interestingly, the map above shows that one of the goals was Warsaw. But what about the Poles, kissing the ass American booby?



            I won't say about the Poles, but they showed about the Germans on TV. That they resented such plans of their "friends"
      2. 0
        24 December 2015 17: 47
        How fashionable moderate opposition right now)
    4. +17
      24 December 2015 12: 45
      It is necessary to delve into the internet, somewhere infa flashed that Churchill in 1945 wanted to hit the Soviet troops located in eastern Europe, we had such allies.
      1. +18
        24 December 2015 12: 52
        Quote: 79807420129
        It is necessary to delve into the internet, somewhere infa flashed that Churchill in 1945 wanted to hit the Soviet troops located in eastern Europe, we had such allies.

        Operation Unthinkable
        1. +4
          24 December 2015 13: 07
          According to the plan of the US Strategic Aviation Command, "it was supposed to drop 179 atomic bombs on Moscow, on Leningrad - on 145, on East Berlin - on 91".

          Hmm .. as far as I remember, a school teacher (in the early 80s) told us how many bombs America was planning to drop on Moscow, Leningrad and my hometown of Omsk.
          Of course, I don’t remember the exact numbers, but the numbers were solid - even then it wasn’t a secret soldier
          1. 0
            24 December 2015 18: 47
            Hello fellow countryman! I don’t understand something, but how jewelry it was necessary to drop East Berlin with hundreds of small bombs and at the same time not to touch West Berlin. Can anyone imagine this?
    5. 0
      24 December 2015 17: 44
      Why were you? The United States has not gone anywhere ........
    6. 0
      25 December 2015 01: 08
      Quote: sasha 19871987
      they had such "peace-loving" plans ... thank gods that planet Earth did not feel our "nuclear exchange of pleasantries" with theirs

      but they didn’t bomb even with a 10-fold advantage.
  2. +3
    24 December 2015 12: 40
    Ah yes democrats, oh yeah bitch children!
    1. +2
      24 December 2015 13: 10
      Now we decided to be equal in everything on our POTENTIAL KILLERS fool , and equal to the highest level fool , "here they have there", so if THERE, then bring down THERE, UB ... ki am ,sorry for the expression, but no more cultural for them! hi
  3. +8
    24 December 2015 12: 41
    Read this article. They write that the Germans were very "upset" by the fact that a strike was also being prepared against them. The inhabitants (German), who do not immediately reach, are probably glad that they are now in NATO and they are not threatened by anything. Naive.
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 14: 32
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Naive.


      As they were threatened by a nuclear strike, they remained ...
    2. +3
      24 December 2015 15: 28
      I would not be upset if 91 nuclear bombs do not matter to the east, it doesn’t even matter that Germany would be enough for everyone in Europe. It seems that the US allies are completely brainless.
  4. 0
    24 December 2015 12: 41
    Quote: Wend
    Yeah, peacekeepers damn it. All would mattresses to blame others on others

    According to their world - peace, so they are writers. smile
  5. +3
    24 December 2015 12: 46
    Haha! They have not read our plans yet. That will pass the term of secrecy ...
    1. +3
      24 December 2015 12: 50
      The plans are military. In case of war. Ours will impress the same, maybe more. As I got acquainted with the plan to capture Japan in the 80s, the General Staff is not in vain eating its bread.
      1. 0
        24 December 2015 13: 45
        And what wonder. Take any teachings of the US Armed Forces in Europe of those cold years .. for example ..
        SKSHU "skillful shooter 83" 7 hell US Air Force report after the exercise
        "Exercise Able Archer 83 After Action Report" (PDF). Seventh Air Division. Retrieved 11 November 2013.

        http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB427/docs/7.%20Exercise%20Able%20Archer%208
        3%20After%20Action%20Report%201%20December%201983.pdf

        the declassified papyrus itself .. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb538-Cold-War-Nuclear-Target-List-Declassif
        ied-First-Ever / documents / section1.pdf

        in fact ...
        http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb538-Cold-War-Nuclear-Target-List-Declassif
        ied-First-Ever /
        1. +1
          24 December 2015 14: 44
          And what to be surprised. Take any teachings of the US Armed Forces
          ----------------------------------------------
          I personally, remember "shield 82", when the 2nd tank tank crossed the Elbe, including across our pontoon bridge, under the detonation of simulators of nuclear explosions. Enchanting, I will report to you.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +8
    24 December 2015 12: 48
    And Russia mattresses are called the Evil Empire !!! This is America, the real Empire of Evil, this America must be destroyed !!!
  8. 0
    24 December 2015 12: 51
    "... unfortunately, still a reality ..."
    Ambiguous! If it weren’t, if the leaders were hyperambic, the whole world would already blaze!
  9. +4
    24 December 2015 12: 53
    such plans once again prove the madness of man as a species.
  10. +1
    24 December 2015 12: 55
    to East Berlin - 91

    think gentlemen gayropeytsy think
    I wonder what would be left of West Berlin?
    1. +8
      24 December 2015 13: 05
      There is nothing to think there if they are already ready to place American atomic bombs of the type B61-12 ... Now look what happens after the atomic bombing:
  11. +10
    24 December 2015 12: 55
    91 bombs! To East Berlin! Ninety-one atomic bombs ???? At the end of something sizzling? They thought the damaging effect and the radiation would be neatly distributed along the wall?
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 15: 32
      They simply do not care about their business, strangers. Not the Americans.
      1. +1
        24 December 2015 16: 22
        Quote: Vinci
        Not the Americans

        Sheriff Indians don't care
  12. +2
    24 December 2015 13: 05
    The true face of democracy. No wonder they say democracy is closer to Satan than to Truth.
  13. +9
    24 December 2015 13: 06
    When the USA disappears from the face of the earth, peace and tranquility will reign on our planet ...
    1. +3
      24 December 2015 13: 41
      Quote: givigor71
      When the USA disappears from the face of the earth, peace and tranquility will reign on our planet ...

      Anglo-Saxons! USA is a product of England! Although this is also someone's puppets!
  14. +4
    24 December 2015 13: 20
    Quote: givigor71
    When the USA disappears from the face of the earth, peace and tranquility will reign on our planet ...

    Well, the ship will sink, and the rats will run away ... Until they find a new boat.
  15. +5
    24 December 2015 13: 24
    “179 atomic bombs were supposed to be dropped on Moscow, 145 on Leningrad
    Well, to begin with, they still had to fly ..
    When these plans were developed, the Americans themselves also had a poor idea of ​​the consequences .. The point is in such an attack ?! How will the "winner" benefit from the radioactive desert? the dust from which will be very quickly scattered across the globe - and they themselves will begin to die of their own "coolness" ?!
    No, all the same they have few brains, obviously not enough ..
  16. +1
    24 December 2015 13: 27
    the fact that American evil No. 1 in the world doesn’t need to be proved, it probably is no longer necessary, and if they pose us as the number one threat, then, in principle, we are on the right track)
  17. 0
    24 December 2015 13: 33
    If the Yankees did not doubt their impunity - I have no doubt for a second that they would have hit, perhaps not in such an insane amount.
  18. +2
    24 December 2015 13: 40
    They are wolves, and their wolf policy
  19. +3
    24 December 2015 13: 54
    "But good that this document was published at a time when fewer Americans know about the terrible power of nuclear weapons "...

    Honestly, I don’t understand the purpose of this publication ... I would have hidden this information so that my face would not be broken for old desires ... This is so, in plain sight ...

    Now THIS does not intimidate Russia ... Or are they trying to make a hint of their "nobility" at that time ??? Could - but did not ???
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 20: 47
      Quote: veksha50
      Or are they trying to make a hint of their "nobility" at that time ??? Could - but did not ???

      laughing !
      I welcome, George! hi
      If we hint - so that chickened then: what if the Russians still have a carrier capable of dragging a nuclear bomb to the White House ?! belay
      Well this is what an incident will happen: the myth of impunity "behind a puddle" will be dispelled once and for all!
      .. But seriously: I believe that sobriety nevertheless prevailed, or intuitively felt that it was not worth doing this - it was fraught with suicide.
      1. 0
        25 December 2015 09: 28
        Quote: avia1991
        that sobriety still prevailed,



        Most likely, not sobriety, but intuition ... And now, as they do not dream of a preventive global strike, they are afraid that the northern animal may survive and sneak up unnoticed ...
  20. +6
    24 December 2015 14: 07
    Only objects of the first category are military targets. Objects of the second category - in order to inflict suffering on the population. In the third, this is the population itself.

    These are the peace lovers. Here's a "God's land", like these ones "light power"...

    Has the US changed since then? No. The USSR has changed, having built up nuclear muscles, and now Russia. There are no grounds for peace and affection for the Amer assassins. They are aggressors, murderers, robbers and robbers.

  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. gcn
    +2
    24 December 2015 16: 29
    I understand how the plan was, but it’s too much for a hundred bombs on the city. They in Japan studied the consequences of using their weapons in rather large cities after the war. It turns out that they wanted to destroy a quarter of the world's population (China is also on the list) in one fell swoop, this is world genocide .
  23. 0
    24 December 2015 17: 16
    Immediately after the war ended and until the mid-50s, the Americans developed about a dozen plans for atomic bombing of the USSR. Only the appearance in the shortest possible time of their atomic bomb and just a couple of years later the hydrogen bomb, which was experienced even before the Americans, did not allow these plans to become a reality. And then everything went by a thread, because there were no normal carriers, and the Yankee strategic aviation at that time had no equal.
  24. 0
    24 December 2015 17: 18
    But what a howl the jackals raised in the West after learning about our planned countermeasures in response to that American plan.
  25. +2
    24 December 2015 18: 51
    Quite a strange reaction in the comments from many. Do you believe in American nobility, human rights and democracy? It's time to take off your rose-colored glasses - we are enemies forever and ever, and if there is a war, the Americans will want to exterminate us like Hitler in 1941 and no "Human Rights" will prevent the Americans from putting gas stoves for our population. No "democracy" will give us a chance to bomb there will be densely populated cities.
  26. 0
    24 December 2015 20: 10
    Figures in the article - sheer bullshit. Americans have never planned to strike at Moscow and Leningrad with so many charges.
    “There are 179 atomic bombs in Moscow, 145 in Leningrad, 91 in East Berlin.”
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 20: 50
      Quote: Old26
      sheer bullshit

      Well: find that report - and give a quote that refutes this data. Otherwise, "bullshit" is your unfounded statement hi
  27. 0
    25 December 2015 00: 03
    http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb538-Cold-War-Nuclear-Target-List-Declassif



    ied-First-Ever /

    This is not about the number of bombs, but about the goals that must be destroyed in Moscow, etc.
    1. +1
      25 December 2015 00: 18
      One B 53Y1 bomb with a capacity of 9 megatons could completely destroy Moscow.
  28. +2
    25 December 2015 08: 57
    Quote: avia1991
    Quote: Old26
    sheer bullshit

    Well: find that report - and give a quote that refutes this data. Otherwise, "bullshit" is your unfounded statement hi

    I found that. And not in a newspaper retelling. The very last thing to comment on the media. Especially in this version, when one newspaper ("Rossiyskaya Gazeta") refers to another ("New York Times"), which in turn refers to archival materials. The result is a "broken phone". According to the plan "Sek" in 1956 against the USSR and its allies should have been applied 4618 warheads. Blows should have been inflicted on 2997 targets, including 1100 airfields. In Moscow, the atomic bombing was supposed to destroy Xnumx goalsin Leningrad - 145, in East Berlin - 91 goal
    GOALS in these cities, not bombs on these cities. So it turns out that the newspaper numbers are FUFLO, since she wrote that 179, 145 and 91 bombs should have been dropped on these cities ...
    In almost all American plans, when it came to cities, on average, one or two bombs were planned per city. According to the "Chariother" plan, it was planned to go to Moscow 8, to Leningrad 7. Instead of 179 and 145

    If you want, see http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb538-Cold-War-Nuclear-Target-List-Declassif
    ied-First-Ever /