Americans ordered a new batch of rocket engines in Russia

84
The United Launch Alliance consortium (it includes Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co) ordered in addition 20 Russian engines RD-180, passes RIA News message Reuters.

Americans ordered a new batch of rocket engines in Russia


The representative of the association, Jessica Rozh, explained to the agency that “the deliveries of the new consignment will begin immediately after the previous order for the 29 engines is completed”.

She recalled that "the engines will be used on American Atlas-5 missiles until the United States develops and certifies its own new engine." RD-180 is used in the first stage of American launch vehicles.

Previously, Senator McCain stated with regret that Congress had to lift the ban on the purchase of RD-180 engines in 2016, which is why "Putin will receive tens of millions of dollars."

The agency recalls that in 2014, the House of Representatives "adopted the amendment of Senator John McCain as an anti-Russian measure on events in Ukraine, which provides for the United States to completely abandon the RD-180 rocket engines." An exception was made only for the ULA consortium, which concluded a contract with NPO Energomash before 2019.

The development of its own engine from the US budget was allocated $ 220 million.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +46
    24 December 2015 10: 17
    $ 220 million was allocated from the US budget


    ...To each... hi

    But seriously, in connection with the US sanctions, prices for Russian engines should be doubled, well, or triple ....
    1. +8
      24 December 2015 10: 32
      These are the so-called conquerors of the moon :))) I am tormented by vague doubts about whether they were there
      1. +17
        24 December 2015 10: 42
        It was, but just in the 90s, the Americans sincerely believed that everything was being sold in Russia and that the military-industrial complex and space enterprises would soon become their property, so why strain your brains and budget if these Russian monkeys did everything cheaper. And then there was a bummer in the face of GDP and it was necessary to restore what was lost. Like our amers, the personnel problem became, the old ones left, but they didn’t raise new ones, and now they are suffering from staff starvation. ours do not go there, but ours are not. The space industry, like all engineering, is an evolutionarily developing area and it does not work according to the grant system, here you need to constantly invest in order to get an outstanding final result.
      2. +1
        24 December 2015 10: 43
        And that you did not read the confession of the filmmaker filming the moon landing in Hollywood?
        1. +4
          24 December 2015 10: 48
          Quote: Grandfather68
          director's recognition

          Do not produce fakes.
          1. -1
            24 December 2015 11: 38


            why do you think this is not true?
            1. +2
              24 December 2015 12: 17
              Yes, because the author of this video filmed it when Kubrick had already died and in this video the author addresses this person, calling him Tom.
              1. -2
                24 December 2015 14: 30
                Quote: Vadim237
                Yes, because the author of this video filmed it when Kubrick had already died and in this video the author addresses this person, calling him Tom.


                I didn’t notice at what minute they say it?
                1. -2
                  24 December 2015 14: 52
                  It's like 2003. The Dark Side of the Moon. Also a "fat point in the conspiracy", also a sensation, the disclosure of a "scam".
                  In fact - a regular rally. And then the video was uploaded with the actors, as they were shooting.
                  There is no serious evidence that the video is real.
            2. +3
              24 December 2015 12: 18
              Quote: Sveles
              why do you think this is not true?

              You have already been answered below
              Quote: Mera Joota
              In the USSR, telemetry was received from the American Apollo, intercepted messages from the moon to the earth and back. Because no one in the USSR doubted the landing of Americans on the moon because they watched it online.
            3. +3
              24 December 2015 13: 21
              Maybe, for starters, you need to prove that this interview is true? What is it really Kubrick?
        2. -5
          24 December 2015 10: 50
          Quote: Grandfather68
          And that you did not read the confession of the filmmaker filming the moon landing in Hollywood?

          Here it is true, finally surfaced, Kennedy, too, because they shot him from behind the Moon ... Everything fits together !!!!
        3. +4
          24 December 2015 11: 49
          Quote: Grandfather68
          And that you did not read the confession of the filmmaker filming the moon landing in Hollywood?

          In the USSR, telemetry was received from the American Apollo, intercepted messages from the moon to the earth and back. Because no one in the USSR doubted the landing of Americans on the moon because they watched it online.
          1. -1
            24 December 2015 14: 24
            Telemetry from a spacecraft does not prove that there were people there. And the opinion of the furomans changed dramatically after the interview of our astronaut (in my opinion, Grechko), which was about 2-3 weeks ago on the forum. But only again, he did not give any evidence, except for words about telemetry. And about Kubrick specifically said that he would allegedly have shot scenes of the moon landing in Hollywood.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +3
        24 December 2015 10: 46
        Quote: Snake AAA
        These are the so-called conquerors of the moon :))) I am tormented by vague doubts about whether they were there


        Seriously, now it doesn’t matter at all whether they were there or not. Fuck you.
      5. +3
        24 December 2015 10: 52
        There were ...
        But then America was, not PendoSStan.
        And even the enemies were worthy ...
        The only question is - why aren't sanctions imposed on these engines and Mi-17 with Mi-24 for Dushmanistan?
        Or will RD-180 be launched by self-delivery, at half price and a 25% discount on conventional (like OD-7k) payload? feel
        1. +1
          24 December 2015 17: 19
          Quote: Thronekeeper
          There were ...

          The only question is - why aren't sanctions imposed on these engines and Mi-17 with Mi-24 for Dushmanistan?


          Perhaps for this:
          <...> The problem is that we do not have modern satellites. We either buy them in a completely finished form, or assemble them from imported modules, or build ourselves, but from imported elements. Even our largest satellite TV operators (NTV + and Tricolor TV) use the European satellite Eutelsat ...
          ... Only domestic satellites of the Glonass system are made of domestic components, the group of which we regularly replenish on the bottom of the Pacific Ocean.
          Alas, the cost of creating domestic satellites is four times higher than foreign standards, and average expected life Russian satellites make up 6,3 of the year, while China has 7,4 of the year (for comparison, the USA and Europe have 9,9 and 10,2 of the year, respectively.
          As a result, we have to deal primarily with launches of foreign satellites, and our share in the global space industry turned out to be vanishingly small - about 0,5%. But maybe we at least know how to launch rockets well?


          http://ruspolitics.ru/article/read/rossijskij-kosmos-traektorija-spuska.html
      6. Hon
        0
        24 December 2015 14: 15
        Quote: Serpent AAA
        These are the so-called conquerors of the moon :))) I am tormented by vague doubts about whether they were there

        Well, before they somehow flew into space themselves. just have a proven, reliable and possibly inexpensive engine, if it suits why change something?
    2. +4
      24 December 2015 10: 35
      Why, in response to new US sanctions, instead of engines, would we not deliver Rogozin trampolines to mattresses?
      1. 0
        24 December 2015 11: 12
        Quote: Vovochka15
        Why, in response to new US sanctions, instead of engines, would we not deliver Rogozin trampolines to mattresses?

        Everything can be expected from the Americans, even a rigged disaster with human casualties. All accusations will fall on Russia, which sold them rocket engines. What noise will be, you can imagine! ..
      2. -1
        24 December 2015 15: 52
        Quote: Vovochka15
        Why, in response to new US sanctions, instead of engines, would we not deliver Rogozin trampolines to mattresses?

        Only with him, let them entertain them there fellow
    3. 0
      24 December 2015 10: 35
      The Chinese would have copied long ago and refused to purchase. And these minds do not even have enough copying, but they undertake to make their own from scratch.
      1. +5
        24 December 2015 10: 42
        Quote: Mahmut
        And these minds do not even have enough to copy

        They have a license for production, no need to copy. But something does not work out with production, and ours will cost less than building at home.
        1. +1
          24 December 2015 15: 55
          Quote: inkass_98
          But something does not work out with production, and ours will cost less than building at home.

          That's it, it makes no sense to spend money on the organization of production, for the sake of a few pieces. Yes, and other carriers on the way, with their engines.
      2. 0
        24 December 2015 10: 43
        They tried to copy, but it was not so simple, it turned out their engine did not give the required indicators - it collapsed earlier.))
      3. +4
        24 December 2015 10: 47
        Quote: Mahmut
        And these minds do not even have enough copying,

        But why?
        Lawyers and bankers rule the ball there.
        They calculated that it would be more expensive at home than to buy everything.
        But the intellects will already go through 14nm of those processes in the summer, and the release of 10nm process technology has been postponed for a year, more than 14nm has not fully paid for itself.
        And what is their stupidity?
        By the way, if anyone may not have heard the Falcon9, Ilon Max successfully landed, though so far only the first stage.
      4. +3
        24 December 2015 10: 48
        Quote: Mahmut
        The Chinese would have copied long ago and refused to purchase. And these minds do not even have enough copying, but they undertake to make their own from scratch.


        Yes, they copied the key nodes, they all succeeded. Only an order of magnitude more expensive. It’s more profitable for them to buy
      5. 0
        24 December 2015 11: 03
        They have already made their own and have actually tested it, only it turned out to be their dear.
    4. cap
      +1
      24 December 2015 10: 43
      Quote: SS68SS
      But seriously, in connection with the US sanctions, prices for Russian engines should be doubled, well, or triple ....

      That's right! We imposed sanctions against Russia, the dollar has risen in price.
      For what carriages at old prices.
      And not for Ulyukaevskie 3.5%, but for 100% we will be like a "real politician" in the West.
      Nothing personal just business. laughing
      I forgot. As part of the conversion, Mr. Rogozin’s department produces trampolines, inexpensively. Discounts are offered to regular customers. laughing
      1. -1
        24 December 2015 11: 00
        Correctly. Only how in Soviet times to sell engines with a load of trampolines. And our trampolines are expensive.
        1. 0
          24 December 2015 11: 30
          Yeah, and also introduce coupons on taxiways, redeem on a monthly basis, and soap-hemp supplies laughing
    5. +1
      24 December 2015 10: 44
      Quote: SS68SS
      ... in connection with US sanctions, prices for Russian engines should be doubled, well, or triple ....

      And to connect the supply of engines with the payment of Russian debt by Ukraine.
      1. 0
        24 December 2015 19: 11
        Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
        Only how in Soviet times to sell engines with a load of trampolines.

        Quote: ChAK
        and also enter coupons on taxiways, redeem on a monthly basis, and soap-hemp accessories

        Quote: Ami du peuple
        And to connect the supply of engines with the payment of Russian debt by Ukraine.

        smile
    6. +1
      24 December 2015 10: 48
      Quote: SS68SS
      But seriously, in connection with the US sanctions, prices for Russian engines should be doubled, well, or triple ....

      It would be possible to introduce an embargo in general.
      But where is the domestic customer of these engines?
    7. +1
      24 December 2015 11: 23
      at the rate and so well run up to the enterprise)
    8. +1
      24 December 2015 12: 45
      By the way, I noticed a pattern: the purchase of a new batch occurs exactly after the toughening of sanctions, is it checked for unscrupulousness?
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. +1
      24 December 2015 14: 31
      And "for a fig" we generally sell engines for mattress mats?
      I think that Stalin would have acted differently-DO NOT SELL! And there are many advantages for the Russian Federation:
      1. US missiles will remain on the ground for a long time.
      2. The development and production of engines will take 3-5 years and "hundreds of lard green peepifax", while not the fact that the result will be positive.
      3. Well, and moral satisfaction - click once again "striped fool" on the nose!
      And the financial losses are not particularly great for the Russian Federation - thousands of times more "tyryat" their own - one Chubais is worth something!
      1. 0
        24 December 2015 19: 26
        Quote: kepmor
        And "for a fig" we generally sell engines for mattress mats?

        Quote: kepmor
        1. US missiles will remain on the ground for a long time.

        US missiles will not remain on earth. Only Atlas 5 will remain on the ground.
        Comparable launch vehicles: Delta 4 - Falcon 9, you can still use the services of France with their Arian-5 of the same class.
        Quote: kepmor
        2. The development and production of engines will take 3-5 years and "hundreds of lard green peepifax", while not the fact that the result will be positive.

        They are not going to do this.
        Quote: kepmor
        3. Well, and moral satisfaction - click once again "striped fool" on the nose!

        This click (financial) will be on the nose of the domestic engine manufacturer.
    11. 0
      24 December 2015 15: 48
      Quote: SS68SS
      prices for Russian engines should be doubled, well, or triple ....
      They simply will not be bought, to the mutual pleasure of McCain and local cheers smile
  2. +3
    24 December 2015 10: 17
    McCain! Aw! Why are you silent? Soon the speech about the next American zrad will push.
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 10: 42
      Quote: oleg-gr
      McCain! Aw! Why are you silent? Soon the speech about the next American zrad will push.

      Grandfather McCain, from such news, has constipation. Not to talk.
    2. +1
      24 December 2015 10: 44
      He is not silent, there he already had a tantrum, now despondency.)))
  3. +1
    24 December 2015 10: 17
    You must bargain with them not only money but also the lifting of sanctions!
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 11: 25
      Quote: prabiz
      You must bargain with them not only money but also the lifting of sanctions!

      Do we need to lift sanctions? Well, if Europe takes off, but the United States does not wave.
  4. +1
    24 December 2015 10: 18
    No gentlemen. Better walk into space)
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 10: 44
      better let them practice trampolining.))
  5. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 19
    Are there really no other topics, because yesterday or the day before yesterday there was already material about this ...
  6. +2
    24 December 2015 10: 23
    An interesting policy for mattresses. They impose sanctions and draw the whole of Europe into it ... Meanwhile, they themselves purchase engines from us ...
    Already they would have refused to launch their rockets into space, for the sake of a "holy" cause !!! ... lol
  7. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 24
    It would be necessary to sell to everyone: the French, Germans, Chinese ... but the Americans - NO !!!
  8. +1
    24 December 2015 10: 24
    Sanctions sanctions, and without Russia, no where .....
  9. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 26
    According to RBC, yesterday there was a story about an American ship (rocket launcher, I'm not an expert), which landed after the satellites were launched into space, with the possibility of reuse. Will our engines be needed now, or will they fly on them? Tell me who is in the know.
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 10: 44
      RD-180 is a closed circuit engine with generator gas afterburning. Merlin-1D is an open circuit engine.

      Accordingly, the specific impulse on the ground / in the void in Merlin is 282/311 units, while in the RD-180 - 311/338 units. 30 units of specific thrust is a very significant increase in payload. They can only be competitors based on price / performance.

      The return of the first stage of Falcon-9 has not yet proved the possibility of its reuse. And not a fact that proves. An example is the Shuttle. Scheduled launches once a week; in fact it was less than once a month, at a monstrous price. One reason is the need for engine overhauls.

      Musk now promises us (just like the fantastic Stark laughing ) that reuse will be possible in a day. We will see. And let's see if NASA will consent to the use of used engines and ships for manned launches, which is what Musk is aiming for.
      1. +1
        24 December 2015 11: 12
        If possible, the start-ups will be cheaper by 30-40 percent no less.
        Even if a thorough inspection of the returning 1st stage
        take a week or two, anyway - a breakthrough.
        1. +1
          24 December 2015 17: 55
          The space-ex Dragon's landing capsule is also theoretically reusable; however, so far there have been no precedents for its reuse.

          At the same time, I am particularly pleased to note that the lander of the Soviet Transport Supply Ship (TKS; had no own name) was actually reused in the late 70s and early 80s of the last century. Only heat protection was changed. The priority in this matter is with the beautiful and powerful USSR.

          And about the first stage - vague doubts torment me; the engine is full of fittings - nozzles, valves, squibs, seals - you can’t get by with just one inspection. RS-25, it was SSME, it was sorted out, replacing doubtful details.

          Reluctantly, I have to admit that Elon Musk, of course, is great. However, he is highly obsessed with aggressive and unreasonable advertising. Launch rates and media deadlines have not yet been met; the carrying capacity of its missiles and their cost are far from those declared. The Red Dragon promised and the super-heavy carrier - so far only promises; the dates are postponed. Inflated the state of Spacex (although initially he positioned a reduction in price, including a small state). He's not very good with commerce either; launches, mainly, for government money, on government orders. There has already been one serious accident and one disaster - and he is going to certify Falcon-9 for manned launches. In the matter of rescuing the astronauts, I literally went through the ass - all ships have SAS mounted on top of the carrier; it "pulls out"a ship or a capsule with astronauts from an emergency rocket at the expense of multi-hundred-ton thrust of solid-propellant engines. And Musk decided to combine the SAS with the ship's engines - that is, they are under the ass of the ship, under the astronauts, and should not pull out, but carry the ship away from the exploded rocket. it will work - nobody knows yet.
      2. 0
        24 December 2015 16: 06
        Quote: Gormengast
        The return of the first stage of Falcon-9 has not yet proved the possibility of its reuse.

        Here, the distant sight is the development of landing and take-off from other planets. On Mars, for example, the atmosphere is very discharged and the landing of manned spacecraft (with subsequent take-off) will be carried out on a jet thrust.
  10. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 27
    and they say they landed on the moon ... what
  11. +1
    24 December 2015 10: 27
    Does sanction mean sideways?
  12. +4
    24 December 2015 10: 29
    Americans ordered a new batch of rocket engines in Russia
  13. +2
    24 December 2015 10: 30
    It is necessary to raise the price of rocket engines. Sanctions .......
  14. -1
    24 December 2015 10: 31
    oh how! Yesterday I slammed the campaign: =):



    Prohibit the export of RD-180 engines from the Russian Federation. What's so complicated ???

    uh no. not guessed. The asymmetric answer will be that we flood them with these engines so that we don’t know where to put them.
  15. +7
    24 December 2015 10: 32
    "" The delivery of the new batch will begin immediately after the previous order for 29 engines is completed "...

    Uh-huh ... And TsAGI in Zhukovsky was left without a "pipe" assembled by the Americans ...

    It’s time to find some way to coordinate the execution of contracts by both parties ...
    1. +2
      24 December 2015 16: 08
      Quote: veksha50
      And TsAGI in Zhukovsky was left without a "pipe" assembled by the Americans ...

      It’s time to find some way to coordinate the execution of contracts by both parties ..

      That would be the right decision! So to speak - to your pleasure hi
  16. +1
    24 December 2015 10: 32
    NPO Energomash and Russia as a whole - benefit. High-tech products; it's not oil.

    Americans, of course, will develop their own engine, which at best will be similar in characteristics (it will not work better), but it will certainly be more expensive. If only because the RD-180 is half of the Soviet four-chamber RD-170; a significant part of the costs of its development was borne by the Soviet Union; in the current price of the engine these costs are not taken into account.
  17. +3
    24 December 2015 10: 34
    The news is good. Europe is drooling due to sanctions, while mandalas are establishing trade. Europeans have no mind left, but this is their problem.
  18. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 38
    Well, maybe they put some preconditions.
    We are not told about all the clauses of the contract ...
  19. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 42
    The development of its own engine from the US budget was allocated $ 220 million.

    Very scary amount. Zero point one thousandths of an ocean. Only three deliveries of American astronauts to the ISS. But you need to take such an amount in one flight and the return is less than a pollard. Yes, it’s expensive, but who cares?
  20. +1
    24 December 2015 10: 42
    The main Russophobe, who lost his mind in the Vietnamese pit, and nevertheless the senator, may not survive 2015 from such news!
    Kondraty will hug, and will write in the corners on his slippers! laughing fellow
    1. -3
      24 December 2015 16: 15
      Quote: aszzz888
      The main Russophobe, who lost his mind in the Vietnamese pit, and nevertheless the senator, may not survive 2015 from such news!
      Kondraty will hug, and will write in the corners on his slippers!

      Many of his like-minded people on our site are also against selling engines! Here is a company gathered! smile
      1. -1
        24 December 2015 18: 19
        Quote: Bayonet
        Many of his like-minded people (in this case) on our site are also against the sale of engines! Here is a company gathered!

        Is not it ??? Read the comments, and if you have nothing to say, then okay, minus the anger, but rather bite yourself in the seat - it’s easiersmile hi
  21. 0
    24 December 2015 10: 43
    Double feeling. It is, of course, good that we are producing a high-tech product that "sworn partners" cannot produce. On the other hand, "They" do not seem to care deeply about the place of production - there is money - they will buy everything and anywhere, but they will achieve their GOALS. Our behavior is similar to that of a rogue GENIUS. And it would be right ... as with Lukyanenko: regression, friendship ...
  22. HAM
    0
    24 December 2015 10: 47
    And where are the Rogozin "trampolines", who have they already sold to ??
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 10: 54
      Quote: HAM
      And where are the Rogozin "trampolines", who have they already sold to ??

      They drank it and rolled it away (no one had time to blink an eye) ... wassat
    2. 0
      24 December 2015 11: 08
      Quote: HAM
      And where are the Rogozin "trampolines", who have they already sold to ??

      The development was entrusted to Russian and Kazakh eighth graders, they will patent it for the third course :)
  23. 0
    24 December 2015 11: 00
    Sell ​​them a better slingshot to launch their missiles.
  24. 0
    24 December 2015 11: 04
    It’s just a business: there is already your own engine, but it’s coming out more expensive than the Russian one.
  25. 0
    24 December 2015 11: 07
    These are the so-called conquerors of the moon :))) I am tormented by vague doubts about whether they were there

    What is there to doubt, no later than December 21, there was an article on VO about the bullet point, which was put in the American lunar scam ...

    http://topwar.ru/88163-v-lunnoy-afere-ssha-postavlena-zhirnaya-tochka.html
    1. 0
      24 December 2015 12: 19
      This bullet is called - "Leftover video suckers".
  26. +1
    24 December 2015 11: 18
    It turns out pretty funny. Europe like complies with the requirements of sanctions, even tries to bend by introducing new ones, and America meanwhile spit on its own sanctions when it smells of kerosene! And you guys there in Europe do what you are told! Clowns ..
    1. +1
      24 December 2015 11: 52
      Quote: dchegrinec
      Clowns ..

      Sanctions were imposed for sale, not purchase. Anyway, they still buy oil and gas from Russia ...
  27. 0
    24 December 2015 11: 26
    Sanctions mean sanctions: raise the price tag, get an advance payment, delay the execution, and if anything, send it to ... or to ..., throw up your hands and say "well, sanctions, you know ...". With such "partners" only in this way, and put them in the knee-elbow position at any opportunity.
  28. 0
    24 December 2015 11: 32
    If inadequate McCain was even a little versed in engine building, he would not have yelled that the US was buying the RD-180 from Russia. You can’t do such an engine in a couple of days. Although they allocated money to develop their own, it is not known how long this development will take. So let them say thanks to ours. And bucks will not be superfluous to us. I would also increase the price. Where will they go ...
  29. -1
    24 December 2015 11: 47
    In response to tougher sanctions, Russia is ready to sell US strategic equipment (engines). They do not respect themselves, so who will respect them?
  30. -1
    24 December 2015 13: 07
    Quote: SS68SS
    She recalled that "the engines will be used on American Atlas-5 missiles until the United States develops and certifies its own new engine."


    No matter how these engines are sent to us from the explosives on board. Great is stupidity, and if it is also refueled by greed, then there will be trouble. Let them build their own, and we'll see. But someone from our government, well, I really want to eat jamon. They are trying to lower the country below the baseboard, and these ............ are happy, here we will earn a couple of lyamas. Give people a decent salary and you will be a couple of lyamov, but at home. The grabbers who do not know the measure finish on the chopping block. Im ho.
  31. 0
    24 December 2015 13: 18
    How is it that they are not afraid to buy engines from Russia? Once a month, at launches, something falls before it reaches the calculated trajectory ....
  32. +1
    24 December 2015 13: 26
    In "striped boys" are arrogant! What about the sanctions? It turns out that the sanctions are sideways when they need something from us. negative
  33. 0
    24 December 2015 17: 34
    Quote: Tiger4
    How is it that they are not afraid to buy engines from Russia?


    what they are afraid of. They use our iron to mold their control systems on it.

    No matter how Russia sells these satellites to the Americans, sideways doesn’t work out the way they use our engines to launch their military vehicles into space.
  34. 0
    24 December 2015 20: 21
    Quote: Vovochka15
    Why, in response to new US sanctions, instead of engines, would we not deliver Rogozin trampolines to mattresses?

    But not everyone in Russia is so silly as Rogozin, who has a boneless language. He spent about a decade in NATO, he didn’t do anything for Russia, and therefore they placed him in a position where you need to rub your tongue.
    To offer trampolines in order to threaten a unique production with their own hands - only Rogozin is capable of this
  35. 0
    24 December 2015 20: 26
    Quote: olegkrava
    No matter how these engines are sent to us from the explosives on board

    On oxygen kerosene? Well, you and science fiction

    Quote: ChAK
    Sanctions mean sanctions: raise the price tag, get an advance payment, delay the execution, and if anything, send it to ... or to ..., throw up your hands and say "well, sanctions, you know ...". With such "partners" only in this way, and put them in the knee-elbow position at any opportunity.

    In fact, we work in such cases not even on an advance payment, but after full payment we just start deliveries. The cost has already increased, compared to 2012-2013, from 9 to 11 million. Bullying even more is stupid. They simply will not buy, but will invest in their own and receive (and so they already have similar ones on the test and at the exit). Americans? No, myself, because it was a lifeline for the plant. You can raise prices and not sell, thereby destroying your unique production, that is, to act on the principle of "spite my grandmother's ears frostbite"