Military Review

The Canadian pilot "mistakenly" launched an air strike on the positions of Iraqi troops in the area of ​​Fallujah

85
The Iraqi television channel Al-Sumariya reports on another “error” of pilots of the so-called American coalition that performs “anti-terrorism tasks”. This time, the “mistake” was made by the pilot of the Canadian Air Force, who eventually struck at Iraqi soldiers, which resulted in the death of at least nine soldiers of the Iraqi army. A Canadian pilot launched a missile attack on the positions of the Iraqi military in the area of ​​the city of Fallujah.


The coalition itself states that the “mistake” occurred about three days ago and it was connected with the “non-updated coordinates of the movement of Iraqi troops”. At the coalition headquarters, they say that a Canadian plane attacked the positions of militants of ISIS (DAISH), eventually destroying around 40 terrorists. And then, suddenly, the Iraqi army began “to attack swiftly” and the Canadian “al” launched a rocket at the Iraqi military, “believing that they were ISIL militants”. As they say, no comment ...

The Canadian pilot "mistakenly" launched an air strike on the positions of Iraqi troops in the area of ​​Fallujah


The representative of the command of the American coalition, Steve Warren, said that both the United States and Canada are launching a "comprehensive investigation" of the airstrike that led to the deaths of dozens of Iraqi soldiers. Apparently, the investigation will be as effective as all other investigations into such incidents, including the investigation of the impact of the American bomber on the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Afghan Kunduz.

Attention is drawn to the fact that after the “mistake” of the Canadian pilot, the Iraqi army in the Fallujah area lost its previous positions, which “unexpectedly” came under the control of the ISIS militants who managed to counterattack Iraqi units and gain a foothold in the area of ​​the important highway.
Photos used:
https://www.facebook.com/rcaf1924
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 21 December 2015 19: 07
    +40
    “Unreleased coordinates of the movement of Iraqi troops”

    Zadolbali already these Iraqis move so fast.
    1. MIKHALYCH1
      MIKHALYCH1 21 December 2015 19: 11
      +10
      Again they teach Iraq, whom they need to fear ... Or, most likely, they are preparing for "Turkish liberation"!
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 21 December 2015 19: 27
        +15
        From the text of the article
        Attention is drawn to the fact that after the “mistake” of the Canadian pilot, the Iraqi army in the Fallujah area lost its previous positions, which “unexpectedly” came under the control of the ISIS militants who managed to counterattack Iraqi units and gain a foothold in the area of ​​the important highway.

        It turns out the Canadian pilot spoke on the side of DIASH. And that he bombed there at DIASH, that they went on offensive. Maybe just one "sand" in the idle "burst out"? Where are the real results of his bombardment of the DIASH facilities? Why aren't they even reporting this?
        And immediately expose the American coalition - "mazil" - "ally" - a MONEY account claim - for those killed and wounded among the Iraqi Armed Forces and for their broken and damaged military equipment in general in this battle!
        And that the MONEY account claim was NOT small! Those. inflate SCANDAL to MONEY compensation for the WHOLE world! That the Iraqi Armed Forces and the Syrian Armed Forces DO NOT need such "allies" in Syria and Iraq in the "fight" against ISIS. At the same time, officially accept the "blunders" of the allies as a system of CONSCIOUS mistakes.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 21 December 2015 19: 33
          0
          Quote: Tatiana
          And immediately expose the American coalition "mazil" - "allied" MONETARY account-suit - for those killed and wounded among the Iraqi armed forces and for their broken and damaged military equipment in general in THIS battle!
          And that the MONEY account claim was NOT small! Those. inflate SCANDAL to MONEY compensation for the WHOLE world!

          None of this will be 100%. Any government in Iraq is very unstable, it is enough to hint the leadership that instead of any help to the government, the IG will be supported by the IS and that's all, there are no complaints.
          Quote: Tatiana
          the "blunders" of the allies for the system of CONSCIOUS miscalculations.

          This is unprovable, and, most likely, blunders and actually unintentional.
          1. guard
            guard 21 December 2015 20: 31
            +8
            do not have illusions, what account are you talking about, to whom to prove !?
            According to the plans of the Americans, it seems to me that the state of Iraq should have ceased to exist for at least six months, to fully enter the Islamic State along with Syria.
            For obvious reasons, this is not the case, strategists from the Pentagon and the CIA scratch their turnips, how to save ISIS, they lose territory, financial support in the form of oil sales is blocked, and the Taliban have so far decided not to be thrown into hell. The Taliban’s subjugation did not take place. It is possible that one of the options is being considered to negate the threat of the Islamic State, hide the militants, cover up the traces (air force of France, Germany, England), and at the right moment pull their trump card from the sleeve. They will back away from their plans, to the strategy of controlled chaos they have been going for several decades ..
          2. Extraneous
            Extraneous 21 December 2015 23: 38
            0
            In this case, it may well be not a deliberate mistake. In the two previous cases, it was clearly a deliberate blow. That four "unidentified planes" on the Syrian positions, that in the strike on the Iraqis.
      2. shalim
        shalim 21 December 2015 23: 02
        0
        stopudovo black crest)
        1. sssla
          sssla 22 December 2015 09: 10
          0
          Quote: shalim
          stopudovo

          Stopudovo brains in the brain!
    2. Civil
      Civil 21 December 2015 19: 11
      -8
      In any war, this is inevitable ... alas ..
    3. Uran
      Uran 21 December 2015 19: 12
      +8
      no coordination with Iraq headquarters. why ours are not mistaken, unlike Western or American?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Tatyana
        Tatyana 21 December 2015 19: 40
        +5
        Uranus (3)
        “There is no coordination with the headquarters of Iraq.” Why are ours not mistaken, unlike Western or American?

        Because to "make mistakes" and bomb not the DIASH objects, but the objects of the Syrian Armed Forces and the Iraqi Armed Forces, in this war for the American coalition - this is its main MAKIAWELLIST mission
      3. kil 31
        kil 31 21 December 2015 19: 50
        +6
        Quote: Uranus
        no coordination with Iraq headquarters. why ours are not mistaken, unlike Western or American?

        There will be coordination now.
        Canadian Defense Minister Harjit Sajan arrived in Iraq on an unannounced visit on Sunday, RIA Novosti reported.
        In public, on the priest’s pilot’s square, aye-yay rods. Sentencing you will fly badly, I will transfer to elephants, the sons of a rotten crocodile. Bhagavad gitta swear. laughing
      4. scientist
        scientist 21 December 2015 19: 53
        +1
        Quote: Uranus
        why ours are not mistaken, unlike Western or American

        Because it’s profitable for us to quickly cleanse the territory of Syria, and the Americans fight longer spending more freshly printed $.
        But in this case, the Iraqi leadership is important to maintain the morale of the soldiers and shake good compensation from the Americans to the families of the victims.
      5. clidon
        clidon 21 December 2015 22: 29
        -3
        I wonder how do you know whether our Air Force is mistaken or not?
        1. The comment was deleted.
      6. UralMan
        UralMan 21 December 2015 23: 06
        0
        Quote: Uranus
        no coordination with the headquarters of Iraq. why ours are not mistaken, unlike Western or American?

        Their radars are not "calibrated" ...
        Here and "smeared" .... is it just smeared?
    4. forest park 86
      forest park 86 21 December 2015 19: 16
      +8
      Accustomed to teaching with Estonians
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 21 December 2015 20: 00
        +4
        There is a commercial interest in the countries of the American coalition.
        It’s just that Europe and NATO countries are satisfied with the robbery of Syrian and Iraqi oil with the help of DIASH fighters at DUMPING prices.

        It has already been established that their legal and illegal profits from the purchase of ISIL oil through Turkish ports have: Israel, France, Greece, Italy, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Netherlands, Cyprus, USA.
        See
        https://eadaily.com/news/2015/12/14/kak-turciya-i-izrail-grabyat-siriyu-i-irak-e

        ksportiruya-neft-islamskogo-gosudarstva-rassledovanie
    5. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 21 December 2015 19: 16
      +23
      The Iraqi air defense, it was necessary to erroneously bring down the Canadian Air Force plane, for the reason that it moves quickly and there are no exact coordinates.
      1. sssla
        sssla 22 December 2015 09: 22
        0
        Quote: Sith Lord
        Iraqi Air Defense, it was necessary to erroneously bring down the Canadian Air Force plane

        Just like that. Instead of a girl, you can also a local man
    6. Simon
      Simon 21 December 2015 19: 21
      +11
      Canadians, like Americans, always have excuses! And it seems to me that they are doing this on purpose. This suggests that this Igilovsky rabble was created by the Americans, and Canadians are an American mongrel, acting at the behest of the Americans.
      1. kiparis
        kiparis 21 December 2015 19: 32
        +3
        I put a plus. I think the same way. The Amer coalition was created to be closer to Daesh and, if anything, to help the Basurmans.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Idvin
        Idvin 21 December 2015 22: 32
        +3
        for reference, canada is a colony of england and the queen in it TRADITIONALLY approves the prime minister after his election
    7. vovanpain
      vovanpain 21 December 2015 20: 12
      +10
      Attention is drawn to the fact that after the “mistake” of the Canadian pilot, the Iraqi army in the Fallujah area lost its previous positions, which “unexpectedly” came under the control of the ISIS militants who managed to counterattack Iraqi units and gain a foothold in the area of ​​the important highway.

      The Iraqis began to advance too briskly inadvertently and took an oil rig, so they got a gift from the sky from the mattress.
    8. Phantom Revolution
      Phantom Revolution 21 December 2015 20: 58
      +3
      Quote: Vladimirets
      “Unreleased coordinates of the movement of Iraqi troops”

      Zadolbali already these Iraqis move so fast.

      It’s just funny for me to listen to the cries of the Western coalition that Russia is fighting against igils with an "unwise" weapon.)
    9. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 21 December 2015 21: 02
      +9
      Quote: Vladimirets
      Zadolbali already these Iraqis move so fast.

      Worse than a drunk Carlson, there can only be a cross-eyed Canadian pilot (((
      But seriously, these "friendly strikes" contribute to only one thing - the Arabs trust the American coalition less and less and more and more rely on the justice of Russia.
      1. Throw
        Throw 21 December 2015 23: 40
        +2
        cross-eyed canadian pilot

        PIG SLIP He, not the pilot laughing
    10. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 22 December 2015 08: 14
      0
      It seems that this is becoming a regularity, I wonder how much patience and extra soldiers the Iraqi leadership will have, it's time to take steps, in my opinion. You have stepped on your foot once, then again, they are about to bark at your face. Will you stand and endure? well then take off your pants and bend over.

      PySy. On the good side, the Iraqis should officially allow Russia to bomb its territory where there is IS, also place the s-300/400 and make a no-fly zone, and the bombers, just like them, should be "dropped" by accident, so that it’s clear, and also apologize and promise to start an investigation the guilty ones, the United States will not dare to send troops and punish while Russia is there. And after IS is destroyed there, Iraq will become stronger.
  2. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 21 December 2015 19: 07
    +9
    This is probably the best Canadian pilot. It’s scary to imagine what will begin when the other Canadian aces begin to fly.
  3. AlexTires
    AlexTires 21 December 2015 19: 08
    +7
    The NATO warriors are just some kind of hellish thrash: kill the 40 Ishilovites and even the score right away! Could this coalition of imperfections be dissolved as soon as possible before they have done something serious?
  4. givigor71
    givigor71 21 December 2015 19: 08
    +9
    Well, what can we say that the coalition is very "successful" in bombing. I wanted them to walk on their own ...
  5. Winged 38
    Winged 38 21 December 2015 19: 09
    +8
    What else can they say ...
  6. sober
    sober 21 December 2015 19: 09
    +7
    No, but when will there be penalties for such dressing ??? Even at work, for the whole garbage, an explanatory bonus and, but here it’s not about what people are felled and do not care !!!!!!!!!!
  7. polite people
    polite people 21 December 2015 19: 12
    +7
    Dozed, however.
  8. 0255
    0255 21 December 2015 19: 13
    +4
    Something they have a lot of "blunders", despite the fact that the NATO army is equipped with the latest technology.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 21 December 2015 20: 45
      0
      Quote: 0255
      despite the fact that the NATO army is equipped with the latest technology.

      "Exceptional" are equipped with the "most exceptional" types of weapons in accuracy! And still the State Department appoints the goals!
  9. NKV
    NKV 21 December 2015 19: 13
    +3
    I don’t understand, but hasn't Canada left the coalition?
    1. 0255
      0255 21 December 2015 19: 53
      +3
      Quote: NKV
      I don’t understand, but hasn't Canada left the coalition?

      The owner does not allow
  10. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 21 December 2015 19: 13
    +1
    It is time for the Iraqi government to raise the issue of banning the activities of the antiterrorist coalition in the country, until ISIS has captured all of Iraq.
  11. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 21 December 2015 19: 17
    +5
    The more ISIS members are destroyed, the more often the "coalitionists" will "make mistakes" in bombing.
  12. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 21 December 2015 19: 18
    -3
    We are talking about the same case, about which already
    There were two articles on VO.
    The blow was dealt exactly at the place where the strike was requested
    Iraqis. But the Iraqis did not warn their ground troops about the request,
    and the canadian did not ask for confirmation before departure.

    In general, a typical story of the inconsistency of the two armies.
    1. Volodin
      Volodin 21 December 2015 19: 25
      +9
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The blow was struck exactly the place they were asked to hit
      the Iraqis
      . But the Iraqis did not warn their ground troops about the request,


      That is, it turns out that the Iraqis themselves "asked" to strike at the place where their troops were located, or it must be admitted that the Iraqi army really moves so lightning fast that the same plane has time to bomb both ISIS and the Iraqi army, occupying their (ISIS) positions like a fly.

      If this is a "mismatch between the armies," then why did the coalition planes not bomb ISIS, allowing them to launch a successful counteroffensive near Fallujah? There seems to be a deep inconsistency ...
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 21 December 2015 19: 39
        -2
        The sequence is as follows:
        The Iraqis asked for an air strike on the spot.
        Soon after, their advancing army took over.
        But she did not report this to the top and the request for a blow was not canceled (error).
        After that, the plane launched a missile strike without requesting the last
        confirmation (error).
        1. Volodin
          Volodin 21 December 2015 19: 45
          +8
          If so, at what point was the Canadian plane able to destroy 40 ISIS? Or the situation already resembled "horses, people mixed up in a heap."

          And yet, why did the igilovts again take control of this very point?
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 22 December 2015 15: 37
            0
            There was a request for three air strikes at 3 points.
            In two cases, IS militants were destroyed, in one case -
            blow on your own.
        2. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 21 December 2015 20: 11
          +4
          Quote: voyaka uh
          The Iraqis asked for an air strike on the spot.
          Soon after, their advancing army took over.

          Alexei, such a sequence is unlikely. The army comes after art or air training, given the fact that the Iraqi army does not have excessive fighting spirit, they are unlikely to advance before an air strike. request
    2. cayman gene
      cayman gene 21 December 2015 20: 04
      +9
      Quote: voyaka uh
      In general, a typical story of the inconsistency of the two armies.

      praise God that the Russian Army is acting on its own plan, and is not following any dubious disagreement.
    3. cap
      cap 21 December 2015 20: 31
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      We are talking about the same case, about which already
      There were two articles on VO.
      The blow was dealt exactly at the place where the strike was requested
      Iraqis. But the Iraqis did not warn their ground troops about the request,
      and the canadian did not request confirmations before departure.

      In general, a typical story of the inconsistency of the two armies.


      Relying on your awareness ...
      nowhere is it written that the chief of staff shot himself? or a pilot? hi
      1. Silkway0026
        Silkway0026 21 December 2015 21: 53
        +6
        All these considerations make sense, assuming that the Americans (Canadians, British, Israelis) are just normal people fighting terrorism .... Is it really funny? These (see previous incomplete list) cynical killers are ready to plow the whole world, and they do not care that your skulls will be in the soil. Only by fire and sword can we (yes, it is we, Russia) restore order on this Earth.
  13. APASUS
    APASUS 21 December 2015 19: 19
    +6
    When I read this kind of news, I always get a feeling of deja vu, where are these super satellites, super computer navigational control, guidance, reconnaissance circuits ?? A day later, they will fuck at the hospital, in my own or allies, and this is the richest army in the world, or I just missed something maybe downs are gaining pilots?
    1. Extraneous
      Extraneous 21 December 2015 23: 52
      +2
      During the capture of Iraq, the Americans were just as well hammering in parts.
      For all their technological power, they have an acute shortage of competent staff. In addition, relying on technology, they often forget that any technique can be buggy. Information checks are often not performed, apparently. And they don’t see the need. Their army consists of 80% of migrants who dream of obtaining citizenship of a great country. And they are not sorry. New ones will raid. Local in general - manure. The more you ditch, the more obese the fields.
      Hegemons! What to take from them !?
  14. Pirogov
    Pirogov 21 December 2015 19: 19
    +1
    Canadian ace, this is something new!
    1. Silkway0026
      Silkway0026 21 December 2015 22: 00
      +2
      Like an Estonian sprinter?
      1. a housewife
        a housewife 22 December 2015 00: 37
        +1
        Maybe Estonian, only in Canada there are a lot of o.h.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  15. semuil
    semuil 21 December 2015 19: 19
    +5
    He flew on foot, if at the time of the launch of the second missile the Iraqi military was already there? They are doing everything so that the flow of free oil does not stop.
  16. Santjaga_Garka
    Santjaga_Garka 21 December 2015 19: 23
    0
    American and coalition planes would be shot down to hell that's all!
    1. Pirogov
      Pirogov 21 December 2015 19: 45
      +1
      And who to shoot down? And what? If you can be more specific!
      1. kil 31
        kil 31 21 December 2015 20: 10
        +1
        Quote: Pirogov
        And who to shoot down? And what? If you can be more specific!

        Iraqis. Here it is. The most important issue for ISIS is not aviation. You won’t get out of here. By any one, you knew that the plane was allies. Be quiet, bear it.
        1. Pirogov
          Pirogov 21 December 2015 21: 23
          +1
          So the fact of the matter is that even if there is something, how dare! At once Iraq will be made an ally of the igil! And who will stand up for Iraq?
  17. bad
    bad 21 December 2015 19: 23
    +2
    And then suddenly the Iraqi army began to "swiftly advance" and the Canadian ace launched a missile at the Iraqi military, "believing that these were ISIS militants." As they say, no comment ...
    ..I'm a soldier of Iraq sorry .. interesting Canadian pilot tortures conscience? ..
  18. uzer 13
    uzer 13 21 December 2015 19: 25
    +8
    In mathematics, an accident repeated 2 or more times is called a system, and by no means an error. Under the guise of a coalition, there is a war against Iraq and Syria. Another proof that it is useless to negotiate with the Americans and create any alliances, treaties and coalitions more than once convinced of this.
  19. cuzmin.mihail2013
    cuzmin.mihail2013 21 December 2015 19: 29
    +4
    I am again plagued by vague doubts. The United States has two hospitals and an Iraqi platoon in its "asset"; Canada has a dozen soldiers. At whose expense the banquet, gentlemen ?!
  20. erased
    erased 21 December 2015 19: 31
    +1
    Or they have no pilots at all, for they are very good and they hit the mark. But then who are they fighting for? Oh yes! For myself. Against all at once.
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 21 December 2015 20: 07
      +1
      Quote: erased
      Or they have no pilots at all, for they are very good and they hit the mark. But then who are they fighting for? Oh yes! For myself. Against all at once.


      "Canadian pilot" ... Something I taste words, no, no ice. Play hockey better, you fucking flyer. But the attitude, of course, to these types of blunders at their usual level - like cattle, banged like bots on the monitor, but the Iraqis filled it up - oh, eh, the sacred ass of the aviator played in the box, it will be heavenly.
  21. Pete mitchell
    Pete mitchell 21 December 2015 19: 33
    +8
    Quote: bad
    And then suddenly the Iraqi army began to "swiftly advance" and the Canadian ace launched a missile at the Iraqi military, "believing that these were ISIS militants." As they say, no comment ...
    ..I'm a soldier of Iraq sorry .. interesting Canadian pilot tortures conscience? ..

    Does not torment, sleeps well. No coordination, no constant flow of information. "Kaolitsiya", God forgive me by itself, with its own interests, Iraqis by themselves. I went beyond the line of the planned advance of the troops - the aviation wets everything that moves. Likewise, twice, in the first and second companies in Iraq, the Americans gouged the British. For the first time, it seems that nine were buried, the second time only the wounded minus two armored personnel carriers
  22. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 21 December 2015 19: 36
    0
    Rumor has it that the excavator crossed the road to the Canadian pilot, so he scared the wrong place and filled it.
  23. barclay
    barclay 21 December 2015 19: 37
    +3
    after the “mistake” of the Canadian pilot, the Iraqi army in the area of ​​Fallujah lost its previously occupied positions, which “unexpectedly” came under the control of Daesh militants
    Comments, as they say, are unnecessary. Fighters against terrorists, their mother ichi ...!
    And now these "fighters" with the help of a "comprehensive investigation" will show everyone how to justly smear the offender. This is "his son of a bitch", he helped others - the same!
  24. PValery53
    PValery53 21 December 2015 19: 41
    0
    All "mistakenly" bombers (in Syria) must be shot down. - This is a "convenient" way to adjust. Ours, too, should not be "wrong".
  25. Leprekon
    Leprekon 21 December 2015 19: 52
    0
    Is it time for Iraq to tear off the mask from the deceitful coalition? Stop waiting for the speech of the representatives of Russia - the rostrum at the UN is open to all its participants. Accustomed, "between trickles."
  26. vobels
    vobels 21 December 2015 19: 54
    0
    "..a Canadian plane attacked the positions of ISIS (Daesh) militants, eventually destroying about 40 terrorists. And then suddenly the Iraqi army began to attack rapidly .." He attacked the militants so slowly that he "missed" the rapid advance of the Iraqi army. This is similar to how the Turks warned our plane 10 times. From one script.
  27. bovig
    bovig 21 December 2015 19: 56
    0
    These are just flowers ... And immediately it was clear whose horns stick out because of the face of ISIS, and now no one intends to hide them ... Again, Russia is to blame ... They began to hammer them in Syria too zealously, so that the Igilovites not run away - it is necessary to support them in Iraq. And who can protect the Iraqi army?
  28. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 21 December 2015 19: 59
    +2
    And can you imagine, friend, what would happen in the Western media if our pilots "missed" so much? .... param..param..pam..pa .. fellow !!!! here it is a policy of double standards. fellow
  29. BISMARCK94
    BISMARCK94 21 December 2015 20: 20
    +1
    Judging by the coalition’s statements, the Iraqi army could be in such a blitzkrieg that Rommel himself would envy. laughing
  30. Comrade Zapirdulin
    Comrade Zapirdulin 21 December 2015 20: 30
    +1
    Quote: 0255
    Something they have a lot of "blunders", despite the fact that the NATO army is equipped with the latest technology.

    "missed"? - orders of the command are not discussed, this is probably in the charters of all armies ...
  31. Grosser
    Grosser 21 December 2015 20: 43
    +2
    The pilot has nothing to do with it. Received a combat mission and completed it completely. But those who set the combat mission, these only knew where the strike would be delivered and who would benefit from it ...
  32. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 21 December 2015 20: 48
    0
    The Iraqis would have banged at some military airfield of the so-called "coalition" of vultures and hypocrites led by the FSA "Grads", and then they would say that they thought there were terrorists ... lol bully
  33. pilot bin-bom
    pilot bin-bom 21 December 2015 20: 48
    0
    ISIS has got its own aviation, the fact that these planes have liveries of the USA, Canada and others is secondary
  34. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 21 December 2015 20: 48
    0
    as I understand it, they don’t have intelligence, or they have intelligence, but in order not to risk their lives from googling Google maps, they assign goals and report about them when they return after intelligence
  35. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 21 December 2015 20: 50
    0
    That's how they (the coalition of pro-striped) and fight with ISIS.
  36. Klibanophoros
    Klibanophoros 21 December 2015 21: 06
    +2
    I remember when the American pilot was airborne the Canadian unit, the Canadian community was seething with indignation. In particular, Canadians were furious that US pilots were under amphetamines.
    Now we must think, everything will be quiet, without protests.
  37. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 21 December 2015 21: 11
    0
    They already got tired of their "mistakes" ...
    Is it a habit of Iraqis to "cut" one size fits all?
    1. Pirogov
      Pirogov 21 December 2015 21: 26
      +1
      Yes, the order was not to give success to the Iraqi attack on the position of the igil, that’s the whole answer!
  38. Denimax
    Denimax 21 December 2015 21: 18
    -3
    Why do they write such provocative articles on the site? I mean a photo with an award.
    Missile damage can always happen. It was and will be. But such a picture blurt out ... well, there is no censorship on you.
  39. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 21 December 2015 21: 18
    0
    But why does the "Canadian pilot" not "bomb the positions of the" dense Saudi king "?
  40. lopvlad
    lopvlad 21 December 2015 21: 52
    +2
    Canadian pilot "mistakenly" inflicted airstrike

    apparently it’s time for the Iraqi troops to shoot down several aircraft mistakenly mistaking them for the Turkish.
  41. afrikanez
    afrikanez 21 December 2015 22: 51
    0
    Here it is! I just want to say, but when will you calm down? But it is clear that until Russia supplies Iraqi MANPADS, the coalition's "business" will continue. There was a pancake, fighters against terrorism am
  42. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic 21 December 2015 23: 04
    0
    Quickly fly up, quickly bomb out and quickly knock down ... (you can say rudely)
    Ha!
    Everything can be done according to normal and d ... ak can.
    And so you try wassat
  43. Grim Reaper
    Grim Reaper 21 December 2015 23: 28
    0
    Friendly fire. Many do not imagine how often it happens. Perhaps a real mistake.
  44. family tree
    family tree 21 December 2015 23: 32
    0
    At the headquarters of the coalition, they say that a Canadian plane attacked the positions of ISIS militants (Daesh), eventually destroying about 40 terrorists. And then all of a sudden Iraqi army began to "swiftly advance"
    Quotation marks specifically, so that they would not take this explanation seriously wassat
    Although, without quotes, again, it looks like a joke what
    Thinking, here and think here what you want request
  45. Russia
    Russia 21 December 2015 23: 44
    0
    Instead of Daesh equipment, they destroy tractors, water pumps, the infrastructure of Syria, instead of Daesh bandits, they kill those who are fighting them. And somehow "error after error". It's very systematic!
    With such assistants - no enemies. Syria, Itrak, Iran urgently need to introduce a no-fly zone for this "codlalicenses "under the leadership of the FSA.
  46. seti
    seti 22 December 2015 01: 00
    0
    The Iraqis have Su-30s. Why don't they shoot down a couple of Canadian planes in response. On occasion, of course. How it is .. oh yes - "by mistake"
  47. Al_oriso
    Al_oriso 22 December 2015 04: 21
    0
    It’s dangerous for Canadians to bomb ISIS, because they can destroy a plane. And the Iraqis are much simpler - they do not answer and think that the pilot is simply mistaken.
  48. wandlitz
    wandlitz 22 December 2015 04: 49
    0
    Attention is drawn to the fact that after the “mistake” of the Canadian pilot, the Iraqi army in the Fallujah area lost its previous positions, which “unexpectedly” came under the control of the ISIS militants who managed to counterattack Iraqi units and gain a foothold in the area of ​​the important highway.
    It was this goal, the HELP of ISIS and was pursued by the coalition air force. They do not fight ISIS, but help him ...
  49. nivander
    nivander 22 December 2015 07: 35
    0
    this is not ace .a osvodovets
  50. Horn
    Horn 22 December 2015 07: 39
    0
    I would not be surprised if the report of the American pilots after the sortie looks like this: "Sir! As a result of an error in the flight chart, I was attacked by the allied forces of ISIS. The losses, presumably, were so many people. I am ready to be punished."
    Something like a "mistake", so 30-4 people and technology. Like a regular flight - so plowed sand and a bicycle with an excavator ...