Project "ZZ". Trump and Putin's Secret Plan

85
Billionaire Donald Trump, a potential candidate for the presidency of the United States, said that if Vladimir Putin respects him, moreover, he is ready to recognize him as a “brilliant” figure, then he will accept it. Not personally, but on behalf of America. Such an ambitious statement was not born from scratch. As the Western press recalls, December 17, Putin called Trump "a very bright person, talented, without a doubt". American analysts are confident that the Kremlin boss favors Trump for a reason: the goal of the Russian leader is to destroy the United States with the help of a Republican villain, a clown, xenophobe and a destroyer. Some observers see this as a billionaire.


Trump in Las Vegas


Recall, December 17, Vladimir Putin, said he was positive about Donald Trump's intention to raise the relationship between the United States and Russia to a new level: “He says he wants to move to another denser level of relations. Can we not welcome this? Of course, we welcome it. ” In addition, Putin called D. Trump a bright and undoubtedly talented man.

Billionaire did not stay with the answer. According to him, such a high assessment is a great honor: “It is always a great honor to receive a compliment from a person who is respected not only in his own country, but also abroad.”

As reported late in the evening on December 20 "Lenta.ru", the contender for the US presidency, Donald Trump said on the air "ABC" that he was ready, if elected to the presidency, to get along with Russia and Putin.

According to a potential candidate, if Vladimir Putin respects him and wants to call him a brilliant man, he will accept it on behalf of his country.

In addition, the politician praised Russia for his contribution to the fight against the "Islamic State". "If Russia wants to bomb the hell out of IG and join us in this, then I’m entirely for it," he said. He added: "If we get along well with Russia, then this is a positive thing, not a negative one."

This kind of courtesy on both sides - from Trump and Putin - gave American journalists a reason to look at one important futurological question with a magnifying glass. What awaits the United States, if Trump is elected president, and he will get close to Putin?

In the American edition "BuzzFeed" an article by the editor of the department of world News Miriam Elder, entitled "This Is The Real Reason Putin Loves Donald Trump." As is clear and without translation, the material is dedicated to identifying the true cause of “Putin's love” for Donald Trump.

The author also recalls the words of Putin, who called Mr. Trump "a very bright person, talented, without any doubt" and "the absolute leader of the presidential race" in the United States. Not without irony, Miriam Elder notes that D. Trump accepted Putin’s compliments on the same day, and he did it twice: speaking on Fox TV and giving an interview to the MSNBC channel. And in the latter case, Trump ignored "questions about the murders of journalists and critics of Putin in Russia." To this, Trump replied: "In our country, too, many are killed."

Miriam Elder, apparently, knows exactly the reason why the Russian leader wants to see Trump in the role of US president. Putin is pursuing his geopolitical interests: he, the author of the article believes, knows how to deal with a billionaire, with this straightforward type, in which all “human rights” and “armed invasions” in the White House will fade into the background. What is important for a billionaire? Right, business. That's what Trump will do. In this journalist, obviously, catches his similarity with Putin. And another thing: in her opinion, Putin and Trump are similar to others: both look like “macho” and tend to authoritarian style of government.

But it's not just about the similarities, business, and autocracy. The main reason is below.

Putin is showing “sympathy” for Trump for his own benefit. The Kremlin is on the beaten dark path. These technologies are already run in by Russians "in other countries." Putin discovered a new tool for influencing a strategic adversary.

If in France, the far-right National Front party received a loan from Russia, in Greece, officials and billionaires close to Putin became friends with the ultra-right party SYRIZA, and the leader of the ultra-right United Kingdom Independence Party, Nigel Faraj, was often in Russian television, then an unpleasant picture emerges: supporting similar parties in Europe, Putin plans to weaken the European Union. The EU is not the limit. Closer to Trump, Putin dared to shift his strategic approach to the USA!

Trump, this insolent type, this xenophobe, this circus performer, has reached such ugly statements in his rhetoric that Washington has become an object of ridicule all over the world, the author believes. And every week this clowning continues. Everyone wonders what a catastrophe it will lead to. They have not yet guessed, and Putin has already realized: it is necessary to extract political advantage from the chaos in the USA. The Kremlin boss only supports Trump because Trump is a “threat” to the United States, according to Miriam Elder.

However, analysts from Europe strongly doubt the strategic strength of Putin. In particular, some Germans deny Putin even the ability to be a strong leader.

Commentator Jacques Schuster («Die Welt») wrote a whole article on this topic. Under the heading “Putins starke Worte verbergen seine Schwäche” (“Putin’s strong words hide his weakness”).

According to the journalist, at the annual press conference, Vladimir Putin "has built himself a strong leader, but he is not." The author finds the speech of Putin as an actor, the face of the Russian leader is called a “mask”.

Jacques Schuster writes that Putin’s press conference is only suitable for the public to learn: Russia is Hoo, and the Kremlin boss is the only one who is able to influence the fate of the country. “Putin is the lead actor in this great performance,” the commentator said. - His face is smooth and resilient, it is pink, and looks like a wax. The mask is made in the cosmetic kitchen of the Kremlin. It may temporarily give the impression of thoughtfulness or belligerence, and yet it is only a mask. ”

Putin needs such “cosmetics” for propaganda: he is aware that his voters “want to see the image of a warrior with the head of the Kremlin”. He caters to the public, but forgets that "strong power behaves quietly, and making noise is the lot of the weak."

The journalist reminds that in 2015, Russia has visibly manifested its weakness. The economy hit oil prices - after all, it is she who serves as the main source of government revenue. And there is no confidence in the price increase next year.

Inside the impoverished country, Putin has nothing to please the electorate with; It remains to flaunt in the field of foreign policy. A typical autocratic tactic, says Schuster. After all, those who become poorer, should be "intoxicated by the dope of victories." It was a dope, since the Kremlin has no real victories either.

In Syria, Russia is likely to suck in the “Middle Eastern whirlpool” (obviously, a hint of a “new Afghanistan.” - O. Ch.). In Europe, Moscow is still isolated. Washington, as before, does not take it seriously. In the face of Ukraine, Russia has acquired an eternal enemy. Finally, spending on military operations: they eat up billions of rubles, and there’s no place to take them ...

There is a slightly different view on the "weakness" of Moscow. American look. It is stated in the journal column "The American Interest".

The news is about Ukraine’s probable non-payment of Russia's debt, despite the fact that the IMF recognized this debt as sovereign and recommended that Kiev “without fail” review the terms of payment with Moscow. However, instead, Arseniy Yatsenyuk announced his readiness to "fight in court." It turns out that Ukraine will not pay Russia if the latter does not agree to the Kiev conditions proposed earlier. The payment deadline expired on December 20, with the default in Kiev coming ten days later when the interest-free repayment delay period ends.

“The American Interest” believes that debt differences between Ukraine and the IMF are “a serious victory for President Vladimir Putin.”

According to the publication, Putin’s geopolitical goal is to be able to create “unrest” in Ukraine “at any time”. The goal of the Kremlin is a faltering and divided Ukraine. On this “front,” the newspaper notes, the Kremlin is achieving “amazing success.”

* * *


Whatever the Kremlin does, everything leads nowhere. And from the chaos, which everywhere, including in its own country, Moscow reserves for itself, can get pretty well the USA. This is today's leitmotif of the Western press.

Chaos and propaganda noise - only the Kremlin has succeeded in this. But the noise and chaos of him and destroy, because both speaks of weakness. In Syria, Russia will get bogged down, Ukraine has made the enemy for many years, in Washington they laugh at Moscow, and Europe continues to “isolate” and sanctions. As for domestic policy in Russia, the Kremlin’s weakness is evident here: the people in the country are getting poorer and eat, apparently, only propaganda.

If in the United States they elect President Trump, and Putin converges closer with him, chaos will also come to the great democratic America. These two - Trump and Putin - will start doing “business” and forget about “human rights”. Today, American citizens watch Trump's circus acts, and tomorrow they will get a real disaster.

Scary, already terrible.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 December 2015 08: 56
    "It is always a great honor to receive a compliment from a person who is respected not only in his own country, but also abroad."


    I think he said sincerely. And if they respect, it means they are afraid!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      21 December 2015 09: 07
      “The American Interest” believes that debt differences between Ukraine and the IMF are “a serious victory for President Vladimir Putin.”


      What is the seriousness of victory for Putin? You look around you and see something else.
      1. +11
        21 December 2015 09: 25
        Quote: cniza
        What is the seriousness of victory for Putin? You look around you and see something else.

        The seriousness of Putin's victory here lies in the fact that with these three billion dollars he hooked Ukraine on a hook, and on such a hook that it is very difficult to get off it. Ukraine is now in limbo, there is a threat of default ahead, and the West cannot do anything about it, even changing the rules of the IMF. Now Putin "commands the parade" and it depends on him whether there will be a default in Ukraine or not, and from no one else.
        The minus is not mine.
        1. -6
          21 December 2015 09: 54
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          default is ahead, and the West cannot do anything about it, even by changing the rules of the IMF.

          promised in the coming hours ... you see? me not...
          1. +7
            21 December 2015 10: 08
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            promised in the coming hours ... you see? me not...

            I don’t know where you get the information from, but yesterday you clearly said that the default occurs 10 days after the date of non-payment of the debt, i.e. December 31st.
            1. +9
              21 December 2015 10: 53
              The default has come legally. The client did not pay on the date indicated in the contract. There is a grace period of 10 days left. But that will not change anything. Nobody is going to pay. Fines for non-payment are much more than interest on a loan.
            2. +2
              21 December 2015 12: 18
              Quote: SRC P-15
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              promised in the coming hours ... you see? me not...

              I don’t know where you get the information from, but yesterday you clearly said that the default occurs 10 days after the date of non-payment of the debt, i.e. December 31st.

              "de jure" - the default occurred, I did not take into account the grace period, but I think that after 10 days nothing will change ...
              1. 0
                21 December 2015 18: 19
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                "de jure" - the default occurred, I did not take into account the grace period, but I think that after 10 days nothing will change ...

                This is all clear, but who is pictured from the trump on the right?
                1. +1
                  22 December 2015 11: 01
                  and behind and this is her sister and she is also single? laughing wassat
        2. +3
          21 December 2015 11: 12
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          on the hook, and on such that it is very difficult to get off it. Ukraine is now in limbo, ahead of default

          I can add that in this way all the money from the IMF that goes to support the fascist. regimes in Ukraine must be transferred to Russia without even going to Ukrainian banks. The end of the financing regime. At least officially!
          1. 0
            22 December 2015 15: 50
            Oleg147741 - A colleague, unfortunately, you cannot repay other loans with money from the IMF ... and this IMF rule has not changed hi
        3. -1
          21 December 2015 12: 41
          Quote SRC P-15
          The seriousness of Putin’s victory here is that with these three billion dollars, he hooked Ukraine, and such that it is very difficult to get rid of it.


          Sorry dear, but this is nonsense.
          He did not pick up Ukraine, but ran into ... giving Ukraine a loan, not seeing what followed.
          Do you think this is a victory?
          1. +5
            21 December 2015 13: 58
            Quote: Consul-t
            He did not pick up Ukraine, but ran into ... giving Ukraine a loan, not seeing what followed.

            If Putin had lent Ukraine all 15 billion at once, then it would have been possible to say that our president got into a mess. And he gave only 3 billion, and not just money, but Eurobonds. This suggests that Putin already foresaw that money might not be given away. With redeemed Eurobonds, this number will not slip. All the same, you have to give, and if you don’t give it back during time, then also with interest. If we sue, it is unlikely that London will do to the detriment of its reputation: Kiev will have to give money.
        4. +4
          21 December 2015 15: 26
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Now Putin "commands the parade" and it depends on him whether there will be a default in Ukraine or not, and from no one else.

          It's nice, of course, that only from him ... What is the result? You do not notice that ukroamerikanitsi somehow not against default. Here, I remember, there was a default in Russia in 1998. The mother-in-law tells me loudest about all of this, who lived in Ukraine in 1998. Here the default was carefully organized. People plowed like a damn, buried industry, stole all the cash, killed an uncountable number of fellow citizens in the Donbas - for what? What does Putin have to do with it? You don’t tell them - they’ll make fun of them. They have a BREAK!
        5. +1
          22 December 2015 07: 53
          I agree with you, the hook was a success. But can we take full advantage of this victory or will it be stolen from us as always?
      2. +2
        21 December 2015 09: 53
        Billionaire Donald Trump, a potential candidate for the presidency of the United States, said that if Vladimir Putin respects him, moreover, he is ready to recognize him as a "brilliant" figure, then he will accept it. Not personally, but on behalf of America. Such an ambitious statement was not born from scratch. As the Western press recalls, on December 17, Putin called Trump “a very bright person, talented, no doubt
        ". Political mystery ... or buffoonery, as you want to understand ...
      3. +4
        21 December 2015 10: 08
        Quote: cniza
        You look around you and see something else

        And what do you think we should see? All that I see is the result of "perestroika" (read the revolution, which took place almost bloodlessly, nevertheless, it destroyed everything to the ground). And if the choice (not by the people) is made for democratization, then nothing else can be expected.
      4. -7
        21 December 2015 10: 41
        Look around you
        1. +2
          21 December 2015 15: 28
          Quote: There are many of us
          neither ... whether

          It is appropriate to write "NOT" here. The situation is like that, you panic.
          1. 0
            30 December 2015 08: 52
            I agree with your comment
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +18
      21 December 2015 09: 09
      Inside the impoverished country, Putin has nothing to please the electorate with; It remains to flaunt in the field of foreign policy.
      - AND THEY know where our sore spot is. And this "internal" issue must be fundamentally resolved. And urgently.
      1. +29
        21 December 2015 09: 12
        The Chinese directly point to our problem in the form of a liberal Government.
        1. 0
          21 December 2015 16: 53
          cniza RU Today, 09:12 ↑ New
          The Chinese directly point to our problem in the form of a liberal Government.

          A true remark, the Chinese apparently wanted to keep secret, and here an effective manager arrived, in general, the Chinese wanted to check the clock, and Medvedev had Libya destroyed behind him (with tacit consent) !! In the east, they will always remember this!
          But on the other hand, the presence of liberals in the higher echelons of power pacifies the West from more radical thoughts about Russia !!!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +4
        21 December 2015 11: 40
        Quote: oldseaman1957
        And this "internal" issue must be fundamentally resolved. And urgently.

        It is a Urgently! already a year urgently ... And what's the point?
        I don’t know who how, but skepticism prevails in me.
      4. +3
        21 December 2015 13: 59
        Oh, come on, why is this "internal" in quotes written?
        Again, say that they are swinging the boat from outside?
        Have you read comments on VO for a long time? At least go to the topic "New factories and workshops in Russia in 2015".
        It would seem - here it is, a list of new manufactures in the Russian Federation - what is not a reason for joy?
        However, the whole topic is literally littered with the whining of dozens of people!
        "But thirty years ago ..."
        "But in the thirties ..."
        "But under the USSR"
        "How many have closed since the times of the USSR?"

        The local audience is no better than the litter-liberals, that's honest. The second whine due to the fact that Russia has not yet deigned to move horses, the first whine because after the largest geopolitical disaster in the history of the country, which, incidentally, happened with the tacit approval of these same whiners, Russia is not developing as fast as they see in their wet fantasies.
        With those that are in the mines.
        1. +1
          21 December 2015 17: 04
          By the way, yes!!
          There was an article on this topic at VO.
    5. +19
      21 December 2015 09: 17
      "According to the journalist, at the annual press conference, Vladimir Putin" pretended to be a strong leader, but he is not. "The author finds Putin's speech acting, calls the face of the Russian leader a" mask "" ...... Not bad is their GDP hooked once have already begun to directly belittle the authority of the President. And Trump is a good guy. The mattress makers have their own Zhirinovsky.
    6. +15
      21 December 2015 09: 24
      Do you want to make noise about weaklings? You say peacocks, hhe. Who makes the most noise on the international stage? Correctly, the USA, who sings louder to them, is also correct, the list is too long; the matter is silent, not paying attention to any mongrels. Yes, and there will no longer be the mattresses of Presidents of the caliber Franklin Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy, Trump? If they choose, then we'll see.
    7. +7
      21 December 2015 09: 34
      Yes, there now, judging by the pre-election debate, not only Trump is a clown, but that’s all ... Such terrible clowns ...
      1. +6
        21 December 2015 09: 51
        Especially Clintonich, with the smile of a joker. Elections in the SGA are always a clowning that has nothing to do with the democratic choice of the population.
        1. +4
          21 December 2015 10: 08
          Quote: lwxx
          Especially Clintonich, with the smile of a joker.

          performed by Kupitman ... Yes
    8. +6
      21 December 2015 09: 59
      This is not about fear, but rather about an attempt to originalize in the spirit of Zhirinovsky (only with an eye out that this is the USA). I think Trump’s clowning in the presidential race will not help him, just as his money will not help. It is clear that money in the States is everything, but Trump still does not have the amount that will allow him to become president.
    9. +3
      21 December 2015 10: 04
      Putin said this about Trump because he has one of all politicians in the United States who has "eggs" and who speaks the truth to his face.
      1. +1
        21 December 2015 10: 17
        Quote: Kibalchish
        Putin said this about Trump because he has one of all politicians in the United States who has "eggs" and who speaks the truth to his face.

        Yes, not his eggs, but the desire to take a chair in the white house, at the end of the curtain, so to speak, to reach a political peak.
        1. 0
          22 December 2015 14: 48
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Quote: Kibalchish
          Putin said this about Trump because he has one of all politicians in the United States who has "eggs" and who speaks the truth to his face.

          Yes, not his eggs, but the desire to take a chair in the white house, at the end of the curtain, so to speak, to reach a political peak.

          and opupya identity ... wassat
      2. +1
        21 December 2015 15: 33
        Quote: Kibalchish
        who is telling the truth in person.

        Yes, how did he say to Jebu about the rating.
    10. +1
      22 December 2015 13: 00
      Putin’s statement about Trump, as it were, determines Russia's preference for the vision of the future US president. But this is just a game, at least for the benefit of the candidate. These are the realities.
  2. +8
    21 December 2015 08: 58
    Well, if our President wanted to use the already tested American templates, then they sometimes bring success. There is a good Russian proverb: "Don't dig another hole ..."
  3. +4
    21 December 2015 09: 05
    The keywords are scary, already scary. Let them be afraid. I’m afraid that Trump will forget his campaign promises if he becomes president. Rather, they will help them forget, even against their own will.
    1. +1
      21 December 2015 10: 13
      Quote: nimboris
      I’m afraid that Trump will forget his campaign promises.

      And who did not forget these promises? Everyone forgot. There are exceptions, however, but they are exceptions.
  4. +2
    21 December 2015 09: 05
    I don't know, but in my opinion, business and politics have a lot in common ... from the ability to negotiate to the most severe suppression of the "partner." And the famous thesis "only business and nothing personal" fits well into politics.
  5. +7
    21 December 2015 09: 11
    Trump ignored "questions about the murders of journalists and critics of Putin in Russia." To this, Trump replied: "In our country, too, they kill a lot."
    Set-off passed. Bravo.
  6. +7
    21 December 2015 09: 13
    "Strong power behaves quietly, and noise is the lot of wimps."


    Without realizing it himself, this German journalist struck not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. But not Russia - no, in no case! Let's ask ourselves which country makes the most loud statements ?! The loudest indignant and indignant? That's right - USA. So "making noise is the lot of weaklings."
  7. +12
    21 December 2015 09: 16
    Whatever the Kremlin does, everything leads nowhere. ... And in the "golden" 90s, it turns out, they went the right way ... smile
    1. +8
      21 December 2015 09: 18
      Quote: parusnik
      Whatever the Kremlin does, everything leads nowhere. ... And in the "golden" 90s, it turns out, they went the right way ... smile


      They really liked it, but now they don’t - the conclusion is clear, we are doing everything right.
    2. +3
      21 December 2015 09: 23
      Quote: parusnik
      Whatever the Kremlin does, everything leads nowhere

      I suspect that the most preferable way is the one that will again lead to excess profits from expensive oil
  8. +3
    21 December 2015 09: 21
    a good person is not called a "shuster". "Schuster" he is in France - "Schuster" (IMHO) laughing
  9. +2
    21 December 2015 09: 34
    "Commentator Jacques Schuster (Die Welt) wrote an entire article on this subject. Under the headline" Putins starke Worte verbergen seine Schwäche "(Putin's strong words hide his weakness)."Well, come on, Jacques, jump further, from the opposite ... and "behind the weak words of Obama (or rather, behind his bleating-bellowing) hides his power belay ..von, like all the aborigines across the deserts ... wait, he'll go, the "hero", in the gym he will wave a kilogram dumbbell and let's fight the world evil again what ) ... so far to our Vladimir Vladimirovich, neither strategic talent, nor physical strength .. oh, Jacques, who Schuster killed, go better write fiction for children, but it seems like it’s a pity for children laughing
  10. +2
    21 December 2015 09: 47
    Without a strong and high-tech economy, it is difficult to withstand the confrontation with the West. Is it time to solve domestic economic problems?
    1. -4
      21 December 2015 10: 06
      Solve internal economic problems who is stopping you.
  11. +2
    21 December 2015 09: 48
    (Jacques Schuster writes that Putin’s press conference is only suitable for the public to learn: Russia is the hooh, and the Kremlin boss is the only one who can influence the fate of the country. “Putin is the leading actor in this big show, - says the commentator. "His face is smooth and resilient, it is pink and looks like a wax. The mask is made in the cosmetic kitchen of the Kremlin. It can temporarily give the impression of thoughtfulness or warlikeness, and yet this is just a mask.")

    But the opus of Jacques himself is a slop concentrate, and the face is the ass of an old lady suffering from hemorrhoids.
    But his nonsense is a balm for the souls of our home-grown liberals (Gozman, Nadezhdin, Oshurkov, Gudkov, Nekrasov, Albats, Novoprudsky, Zhavoronkov, Steinman, Mitrokhin, etc.) Yes
  12. +1
    21 December 2015 09: 50
    "Whatever the Kremlin does, everything leads to nowhere. And from the chaos that Moscow leaves behind everywhere, including in its own country, the United States can pretty much get it. This is today's leitmotif of the Western press."

    Their amazing ability to translate arrows from a sick head to a healthy one! Who - who, and not amerikosovtsy would tell us here about chaos and devastation. In the 90s, we experienced "their love" on our own skin. And now there are illustrative examples around the world! And these ur ... dy are still pointing their finger at us ...
  13. 0
    21 December 2015 09: 59
    Here are western toads, have gotten loose. They predict, predict ... - they got scared, the unfortunate ones stirred. They are trying to convince themselves that no, Russia is not as strong as it seems.
  14. +1
    21 December 2015 09: 59
    Again "cunning" plans! What Trump is doing now is his death sentence (look at Le Pen's party)!
    As for the big words, Jacques Schuster is right in some ways, because it is wiser to silently gain military and political power and act, rather than shouting ambitiously (for example, China) ... But inside the country, indeed, "no ice" and the only justification is "world conspiracy!"
    We have a strong country with great opportunities, but liberal liberalists, a weak economy (thanks to the same comrades), etc. do not allow these opportunities to develop.
  15. 0
    21 December 2015 10: 06
    I can’t say that Trump is better than Obama, but certainly better than this witch!
    The question is different. How is he going to negotiate with the elite and Wall Street money bags, or will he wave his saber? I hope this man at least at least extinguishes the degree of war in the ranks of the black-supporters.
  16. +2
    21 December 2015 10: 13
    Whatever the Kremlin does, everything leads nowhere. And from the chaos, which everywhere, including in its own country, Moscow reserves for itself, can get pretty well the USA. This is today's leitmotif of the Western press.

    Funny !!! Everything is upside down. Who excites the whole world? Have we been fighting for decades now with different countries ?, are we bringing chaos where we appear ?. It is not Putin who conquers you, but you yourself are losing to yourself by your ignorance. Even with failure you cannot be honest, and you cannot hear the truth, how can you win?
  17. +2
    21 December 2015 10: 24
    You can’t believe the Americans, it’s an axiom ..... whoever comes to power, the result is one-constant confrontation of powers. And there were always enough clowns like Trump ... they are not real rulers ...
    1. +2
      21 December 2015 10: 56
      Quote: Alexey-74
      And there were always enough clowns like Trump ... they are not real rulers ...


      Quite right, "good" Trump - only until the moment of taking the oath, and then - according to the knurled pattern - to carry out the orders and wishes of the shadow rulers of the Anglo-Saxon world.
      The blackest one also began, like all the previous ones, with a palm branch, but how does it end?
  18. 0
    21 December 2015 10: 38
    When you read about human rights, in the end it all comes down to one thing - support and protection of the rights of homo minorities. The rest is water. As well as the eternal slogan of the thesis "freedom" ..
  19. 0
    21 December 2015 10: 39
    -that is ready to get along with Russia and Putin if elected to the presidency.
    Alas, for "such" words may not be chosen ...
  20. +2
    21 December 2015 10: 41
    The Amerian establishment is so crushed that Trump looks like a giant on a general gray and dumb level.

    Obama was elected solely for his blackness - and this is what it led to; degradation of politics; now even the chemical bush doesn't look so bad.

    Now Clinton will "to elect"for not having a penis.

    And all the other candidates are completely degenerates suffering from megalomania; not understanding real politics and in general the realities of today; extras on the stage of a theater that no one has been going to for a long time.
  21. 0
    21 December 2015 10: 46
    Freedom Angela Davis! Ugh, Donald Trump! drinks
  22. 0
    21 December 2015 10: 52
    Donald, for starters, you need to chop wood, melt the stove, knead the dough, only then you can respect it, and recognition ... And then you’ve divorced the election program, you know ...
  23. 0
    21 December 2015 10: 56
    Quote: moskowit
    Well, if our President wanted to use the already tested American templates, then they sometimes bring success. There is a good Russian proverb: "Don't dig another hole ..."


    Judging by these words - "the master of the Kremlin favors Trump for a reason: the goal of the Russian leader is to destroy the United States with the help of a villainous Republican, a clown, a xenophobe and a destroyer." am am am Well, so clear pepper, we always dreamed about it, to take Trump and ruin the United States! bully We, Russia, are evil gnomes who sleep and see how to destroy the "great world" - a mattress! Yes feel And they "poor-unfortunate" do not know how to save themselves from us! belay To get their logic wretched! fool am
  24. +1
    21 December 2015 11: 02
    Washington has become an object of ridicule around the world

    But just not the fault of Trump. Enough talking heads from the State Department and the Moscow Defense Ministry to make normal-minded people laugh at the United States. Therefore, in vain they are trying to shift their shoals from a sore head to Trump's head.
  25. +1
    21 December 2015 11: 21
    Horror! Now Trump is Putin's agent!
  26. 0
    21 December 2015 11: 29
    "The US BuzzFeed has published an article by World News Editor Miriam Elder."
    Why does this whole editor call the completely left-wing "SYRIZA" an ultra-right party?
  27. 0
    21 December 2015 11: 31
    If Trump is elected president in the United States, and Putin comes closer to him, chaos will also come to great democratic America.

    That's what I see that order reigned in Ukraine and a solid idyll in everything, after saddling it with states. The entire part of the world under state control is a large livestock farm, only they have different roles, some for wool (Europe), others for milk (CA and Qatar), and still others for meat (Ukraine, Iraq, Libya). laughing
  28. 0
    21 December 2015 11: 38
    Ndaa, something new, such an impression as journalists try to insult our president, they get the opposite.
  29. +1
    21 December 2015 11: 49
    But what remains of Putin, how not to flaunt it? After all, the Russian people have the only support. Even Belarus is waiting for the collapse of Russia, it also has territorial claims. And what about the rest. Jackals around have prepared to tear Russia. Look around, on command they’ll all pounce on us and they’ll pity we won’t be, just a pig has gained weight and needs to be eaten. And they can be the first to launch a nuclear strike in the hope that we will regret them. Sanctions and the price of oil will finish our economy. What should we do? dollar, because it’s clear that falling oil prices is an order. If the United States didn’t have the oil industry, how do you explain the strengthening of the dollar? What are they not suffering losses? Shale oil is another deception. They don’t have a damn thing. Therefore, stop falling prices you can start buying it. This whole bluff will open.
    1. 0
      22 December 2015 17: 18
      Well done, I’m looking, you’re poisoning Russians in the countries of the former Union
      I just probably forgot that for 15 years these countries survived as best they could. And only in Georgia and Ukraine did seedlings flourish, while others held themselves in complete count of decline, hoping for rebirths, and without rhetoric towards Russia. Since when did Russia begin to keep the interests of geopolitics? So think about what other republics can officially support Russia, which means Maidan on cookies right away.
  30. 0
    21 December 2015 11: 57
    The US electoral system does not provide for direct voting. The electors, who are specially selected, vote. The procedure for retaining power is developed for each country in accordance with its characteristics. It works. (Do you still have democracy? Then we fly to you.) I recommend reading "Political Parties" by Maurice Duverger.
  31. 0
    21 December 2015 12: 13
    Masks of the Kremlin !!!! Some kind of nonsense, then Fushington Foundation. They no longer know which side to pick up. In general, the transition to the identity of the losers.
  32. bad
    +1
    21 December 2015 12: 19
    In Syria, Russia is likely to be sucked in by a "Middle East whirlpool" (obviously a hint of a "new Afghanistan."
    ... look how would you not "suck" yourself .. who would say, German bedding occupied by mattresses .. where is your gold? sad
  33. 0
    21 December 2015 12: 48
    Commentator Jacques Schuster (Die Welt)

    Isn’t Savik's brother an hour?
  34. +2
    21 December 2015 13: 03
    What is Putin’s weakness? In many countries of the world, he was recognized as the man of the year, the most influential leader, his portraits in all world publications on the first pages. Now remember Yeltsin, who was shown when he was drunk conducting the orchestra, when he slept on an airplane and laughed all over Europe . now they’re not funny, now they’re advising. Or, when she and Shevarnadze gave away the waters of the Bering Strait of the United States, when he could get 1,5 billion marks for the property of the USSR in Germany, he simply presented them when he cut the missiles that were such a hindrance to the United States and he froze all nuclear developments. The whole world applauded him because he did what was beneficial to them and not to us. Here is where the weakness is, and Puta is not the plasticine from which you can sculpt whatever they want.
  35. 0
    21 December 2015 13: 28
    Robert Kennedy, also confidently walked to the presidency - did not reach ...
  36. 0
    21 December 2015 13: 43
    if Vladimir Putin respects him, moreover, he is ready to recognize him as a "brilliant" figure, then he will accept it.

    Even if he respects, he still won't drink. So Mr. Trump can “accept” with a clear conscience (in front of the mirror).
  37. -1
    21 December 2015 14: 24
    Trump American version of Zhirinovsky laughing
    1. 0
      21 December 2015 20: 55
      Quote: Seneca
      Trump American version of Zhirinovsky laughing

      Most likely Prokhorov ... So, having fun! That's just from Prokhorov, he is not afraid of anything! good
  38. +2
    21 December 2015 15: 50
    Much has been written that China is our loyal ally and brother. Now this "ally" has stuck another knife in the back of Russia. Turkey did it first. In fact, China has described the Russian government so derogatory that it does not fit into the diplomatic framework, but looks like a statement by the mother country about its colony. Which, unfortunately, is very similar to the truth. Well, who is responsible for such a personnel policy in the country?
    "China announced the strategic impasse of Russia
    Russia is undergoing a structural economic crisis and is in a strategic impasse. This assessment was made on Friday by the state news agency of China "Xinhua.
    The article came out immediately after the conclusion of a two-day visit to Beijing by a Russian government and business delegation led by Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. "
    So what, the "favorites of China", got a knife in the back from their "friend"? "China's friendship with Russia forever" - ugh!
  39. +1
    21 December 2015 15: 58
    Quote: СРЦ П-15
    If Putin had lent Ukraine all 15 billion at once, then it would have been possible to say that our president got into a mess. And he gave only 3 billion, and not just money, but Eurobonds.


    What's the difference? 3 or 15? That so, that differently, we lost money.
    And how much we for 20 years in Ukraine got rid of dough? Do not tell me?
    And half of these years on our board, who?
    Why did we let the sprouts of fascism rise in Ukraine and did nothing against it? Why did our ambassador Zurabov sit in Ukraine and did nothing with Russophobia? What is he? didn't understand the consequences? Or didn’t want to?
    So dear, history has no subjunctive mood and all matters will be evaluated by descendants.
    What about us? It remains to endure and sing the mantra. Is it clear to whom?
  40. 0
    21 December 2015 16: 51
    After reading a review of the fictitious Western press about the remarks of Putin and Trump,
    you begin to understand that the leader in intelligence for the United States and the West is Psaki.
  41. +1
    21 December 2015 17: 47
    IMHO. whoever the president is chosen in the United States, this will not make it easier for our country. All US Presidents will be blow into your pipe.
  42. +2
    21 December 2015 18: 41
    "Why then, not being afraid of sin,
    Does the cuckoo praise the Rooster?
    Because he praises the Cuckoo. "
  43. +6
    21 December 2015 19: 57
    Strange on VO about these people nothing.
    1. +2
      21 December 2015 20: 02
      Quote: Gardamir
      Strange on VO about these people nothing.

      The main thing that we remember.
    2. +1
      21 December 2015 21: 13
      Gardamir But this is very good! Only for some reason, Stalin is in the background, and somehow in the shade. And this is not good.
  44. 0
    21 December 2015 20: 42
    Trump, this is their Zhirinovsky, on the move ....
  45. 0
    21 December 2015 20: 45
    Savik, log in, which of you is Jacques?!?))))
  46. 0
    21 December 2015 20: 58
    the west brought Poroshenko - we will bring trump.
  47. -2
    21 December 2015 21: 40
    Dear forum users, let's be honest. Putin is smart. Strong, but psychologically and physically strong. The liberal is without a doubt a liberal. I talked about it myself. A face is a mask, but a mask, both literally and figuratively. Satisfied with the government, but satisfied. Bear drugan, of course drugan. Patriot is a statesman, but a statesman is a patriot. He does not give his type of furniture maker and his woman, but he does not.
    Who is Mister Putin?
  48. +1
    21 December 2015 22: 28
    Why does a cuckoo praise a rooster ...
  49. +1
    22 December 2015 00: 33
    Trump will not be chosen. So they say in America itself. Yes - he is the best of the Republicans, but he loses significantly in the ratings of Hilary Clinton. Democrats have the majority of voters.
  50. 0
    22 December 2015 10: 28
    And he was bright, even before he became a presidential candidate, he feels like a MAN in a good sense of the word, but if he wins, then, like all presidents, he will defend the interests of the United States, but you can negotiate with him, he is a professional manager, yes there will be bargaining, but as they say in the classics "bargaining is appropriate", I think he will be an outstanding president like Roosevelt and Kennedy.
  51. 0
    31 December 2015 01: 23
    If Trump attacked Putin and praised Paroshenko, he would be a great dude...