Military Review

What mafia will you enter tomorrow? About the main effect of the global crisis

42
Dear Readers,


As the sociological service "Pugh Research" informs us, the middle class in the United States of America has declined dramatically and is very impoverished.

If you are interested in what have we and the terrorists from the IG, then let's talk about it.

Stuck all that's what. The USA is the foremost country of that world, which is still traditionally considered to be the “first” and retransmits its ideology to the rest of the planet. On us too. Patriotic or liberal, but the domestic elite somehow focuses on North America as a model. Nothing can be done about it, they were taught this way, their youth fell on such Americanophilous hysteria that they would hardly ever be able to get rid of its traces in the mind.

Those who wish can remember how many times they have read and heard mantras about the need to have “their own middle class” in Russia. Because here "in America there is a middle class, and this is the basis of America."

So. The basis of America (even if the phenomenon itself was in question, because it was not determined by wealth, but by consumption) becomes poorer and melts. From above, a rich minority comes off of it - the rich class is also growing, sucking in a part of the former average, - and from below it is swallowed up by the new American poor. Which earlier was twice less, and now it became twice more.

Why is it important? Because we have the same trends. Today, according to the “decile coefficient of funds” (do not ask what it is - UN researchers use this term) 10% of the richest citizens is 16,8 times richer than 10% of the poor. The trend is observed all last decade. The abyss grew during the oil bliss and grew during the 2008-2010 crisis. It grew in the “monetary thaw” of 2011-2013 and continues to grow now, at the time of the recession.

And the same thing happens all over the world.

Why - it is clear. In a world ruled by the “golden percentage,” he naturally appropriates most of the wealth. He has more opportunities, he writes the laws, he sponsors the party and wins in the courts. He has a financial, power, legal and organizational advantage over any poor and middle peasants. And their iron will to profit sooner or later leads to the situation described in the American 1940 song about the miners:

“Sixteen tons raised - and what on hand?

You have become a day older and deeper in debt. "

As long as the widening of the abyss between the rich and the rest is hiding behind the growing prosperity of the “others” - they can afford to overlook it. When the world crisis and the “others” get poorer in the yard, the abyss becomes painfully noticeable.

What is important here: there is not much difference whether the rich class of the country is private or bureaucratic. At the special Olympiad between “liberals” and “loyalists,” the question of who owns the glamor is sharp and tough. For the majority, it is quite different: how to live and what to strive for in the new world, where you, the representative of the “others”, have little light.

It is not known how long - but we have to live in a world where there will be anew and quite clearly separated castes. Where there will be some kind of gold interest, owning almost everything - and there will be an increasingly lagging majority of them, not really owning anything. Where large networks - no matter what - will continue to push small individuals. Where yesterday's shopkeepers will stand at the cash desks of supermarkets of the "new" (or not very new) aristocracy. And yesterday's owners of online stores will advise on the Euroset (there will be no “thousands of teams" - the network era. Network age teams are small, just thousands of mini-groups have one owner). Where bright businessmen will fight to the death with bright officials Vasiliev for glamor, and the rest can not worry.

Where the existence of social elevators will at best be simulated by the bosses to support "corporate spirituality".

And where it will go - in some places sluggish, and in some places hot - world war, the constant companion of world crises.

It will be a world, partly reminiscent of feudalism - the size and insuperability of the gap between the golden percentage and the rest of 99.

But it will differ from feudalism in that the “mean classes” will not have ownership of the means of production, and the noble ones will not have ownership of the producers.

It will be a world, partly reminiscent of imperialism of the beginning of the last century — that the privileged castes will own the means of production and profit.

But it will differ from the imperialism of 1900 in that the majority of citizens will not have in the hands of the “mass rifle” from which the democracies and totalitarianism of the XX century have grown. Armies are shrinking, turning from "millions with guns" into "hundreds riding on robots."

These hundreds on robots will fight. Other hundreds will make parts of combat robots, and others will develop them. And millions? - Millions will continue to advise on Eurosets scattered throughout the world.

At the same time, the coming new world is much less inclined to riots and revolutions than the past. Just because the average age of an earthling from a developed country today is no longer 16-20 years ago, but a good thirty years ago. “Societies of forty-year-olds” - with an ever-increasing proportion of older people - to put it mildly, are not very eager for rebellion and the desire to change everything.

Why am I all this, actually.

I have a version, dear readers. The most unexpected effect of social stagnation in a period of deep global crisis will be (suddenly) a crisis of individualism.

The one that was created the whole century.

After all, in fact, the cause of the degeneration of communities and the disintegration of even the traditional family matrix - purely at the household level - was one simple thing: the person became better and “more promising” to live alone. Survive, being tied not to the extensive relatives (religious community, village), but to their own qualifications.

The new caste device this prospect and convenience of loneliness - destroys.

Individualism became a direct consequence of the industrial age - and it can exist only as long as the "industrial effect" works. In the post-industrial era, when the number of people employed in mass production is constantly decreasing, and new technological leaps that would create new sectors of the economy and new mega-production with hundreds of thousands of hard workers each are not foreseen - in such an era, the value and bonuses of individualism plummet.

This is already reflected in those very advanced societies. In the US today - which has not been around for many decades - half of 25’s young people continue to live with their parents. This is theirs.

This is very important, because it speaks of the forced return of Free Self-sufficient Persons to the suffocating embrace of others.

And now - the most important thing. The logical continuation of this rollback to “pre-individualism” is the creation of new communities at the bottom of the social pyramid. Including in the form of clans, mafias and triads. For all these well-known organizations were born in their time as the brotherhood of mutual aid in times of crisis.

And mutual assistance in the new, poor, middle-aged, caste and warring world is very much in demand. It in all its forms - from the most touching to the most terrible - always arises where the ruling minorities view the majority as “born to be a victim”.

In some places these “new” collectivists, and in the most terrible variant, already claim their rights to power and wealth. There is one curious nuance confirming that we are dealing with a global phenomenon. Most of the "foreign militants" TOZR IG - are from the so-called. civilized countries. Of the 20 thousands of imported Igilians, the majority are not citizens of the poor in Yemen, Somalia or Afghanistan. These are semi-Europeans from Tunisia, half-Europeans from Turkey, and no less than 5 thousands - in general Europeans.

It has not happened yet that the citizens of the “first world” fought for anti-civilizing ideas from such a “third” with such passion. And there is every reason to believe that this is only the beginning.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.odnako.org/blogs/v-kakuyu-mafiyu-vi-zavtra-vstupite-o-glavnom-effekte-mirovogo-krizisa/
42 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grabberxnumx
    Grabberxnumx 21 December 2015 12: 22 New
    15
    For just this one sentence can I put fat PLUS.
    Patriotic or liberal, but the domestic elite is somehow guided by North America as a model. There is nothing to be done, they were taught that way, their youth fell on such an Americanophile hysteria that they are unlikely to ever be able to get rid of their traces in their consciousness.

    I have many friends who are still struggling in ecstasy at the word "America." Only now, IMHO, their development has stopped at the same age 15-20 years, which accounted for the love of America.
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 21 December 2015 12: 36 New
      11
      I have many friends who are still struggling in ecstasy at the word "America."
      I confirm, "... I live in Russia and I hate it like that, everything is bad with us, and they have everything for people ..." the typical position of the liberals and the Pepsi-Cola generation. Drooling out discussing the stench of ex-matzah and the lord. Less often you hear from them “let’s talk about women” or “let’s talk about football” than with a smile they relish some dirt about the country where they were born and live. Most of them are shallow and nice guys. But they don’t have a sense of responsibility for the country in front of themselves and their ancestors.
      1. Horst78
        Horst78 21 December 2015 12: 49 New
        -3
        Quote: Balu
        Balu (8) RU Today, 12: 36 ↑ New

        I have many friends who are still struggling in ecstasy at the word "America."
        I confirm, "... I live in Russia and I hate it like that, everything is bad with us, and they have everything for people ..." the typical position of the liberals and Pepsi Cola Generations. Drooling out discussing the stench of ex-matzah and the lord. Less often you hear from them “let’s talk about women” or “let’s talk about football” than with a smile they relish some dirt about the country where they were born and live. Most of them are shallow and nice guys. But they don’t have a sense of responsibility for the country in front of themselves and their ancestors.
        Here it is not necessary to “Pepsi-Cola” touch. This is a Soviet drink, unlike the Amerian “Pepsi” and “Sosa Soly”. I really liked Pepsi-Cola on the beaches of Anapa and Abkhazia good
        1. Baloo
          Baloo 21 December 2015 13: 02 New
          +7
          Horst78
          I do not agree. What do you know about the composition of Pepsi Cola? And what do you know about one of the components of all counts: phosphoric acid?
          I recommend natural juices only if you make them yourself, dilute 1: 2 with boiled water and you will have little happiness. Factory juice only with pulp, I recommend the Gardens of the Don region. hi
          1. Horst78
            Horst78 21 December 2015 13: 09 New
            0
            Quote: Balu
            Balu (8) RU Today, 13: 02 ↑ New

            Horst78
            I do not agree. What do you know about the composition of Pepsi Cola? And what do you know about one of the components of all counts: phosphoric acid?
            I recommend natural juices only if you make them yourself, dilute with boiled water 1: 2 and you will have little happiness. Factory juice only with pulp, I recommend the Gardens of the Don region. hi

            Thanks for the recipe hi
          2. CONTROL
            CONTROL 21 December 2015 15: 04 New
            +3
            Quote: Balu
            Horst78
            What do you know about the composition of Pepsi Cola? And what do you know about one of the components of all counts: phosphoric acid?

            ...orthophosphoric acid?
            Do you want to wash the enameled bath from rusty drips? Pepsi in your hands! checked ...
            1. Baloo
              Baloo 21 December 2015 15: 19 New
              0
              .orthophosphoric acid?
              Do you want to wash the enameled bath from rusty drips? Pepsi in your hands! checked ...

              Sprite and all power engineering are the same. I want to drink, drink water or juice, but not soda like cola. Sweet taste is the simple secret of the appeal of these drinks.
              1. S-kerrigan
                S-kerrigan 22 December 2015 08: 43 New
                0
                Eh, it’s a pity that without this crappy fuel my brain does not work as it should. He needs a vigorous dose of "fast energy." For myself, I decided this dilemma by taking at least the colorful and least sweet of all (7up). And I try to alternate with juices (albeit store-bought).
                1. Baloo
                  Baloo 22 December 2015 19: 42 New
                  0
                  For myself, I decided this dilemma by taking at least the colorful and least sweet of all (7up). And I try to alternate with juices (albeit store-bought).
                  Ask the composition of this rubbish, consult a toxicologist or just a chemist. Learn a lot of interesting things. To spur energy does not need chemistry, it depletes, do not even notice. You need to learn how to create a good mood. Recall your beloved woman, how good she is, you know. Something funny or funny. in a word, psychologically stroke yourself, neurophysiologically-move the center of pleasure in the brain. The release of endorphins, the mood has risen, the brains have stirred and you will have a feeling of satisfaction and a little happiness. hi
                2. The comment was deleted.
            2. gladcu2
              gladcu2 21 December 2015 15: 40 New
              0
              CONTROL

              This is a departure from the topic.
    2. iouris
      iouris 21 December 2015 12: 38 New
      +6
      Patriotism and liberalism are not antipodes. The steamer can be large and white. But the "domestic elite" can not "focus on North America."
      By the way, said Dmitry Simes pointed out to the national traitors that the USA cannot bet on them, because even in the event of a seizure of power, such an "elite" will not be able to hold this power for a long time.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  2. kazachyok69
    kazachyok69 21 December 2015 12: 23 New
    -4
    10% of the wealthiest citizens are 16,8 times richer than 10% of the poor.

    Why tell passions about some kind of ah? Why rejoice? Is it even worse with us? Or is it not so?
    1. Grabberxnumx
      Grabberxnumx 21 December 2015 12: 29 New
      +9
      I am glad that you will be able to read, but you also need to be able to understand what you read!
    2. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 15: 42 New
      +2
      kzachek

      America is the prime model of society. It crashes. Therefore, it does not equal this model.
  3. oldseaman1957
    oldseaman1957 21 December 2015 12: 29 New
    +8
    “Born to be a victim” - The confusion in the article is enough, but the essence is clear. And if the people are inert, they will be bent into a ram’s horn and they will not ask for a name. So, you don’t need to go to ISIS, but you need to be more specific about internal politics. Though the prime minister, even the president.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 15: 57 New
      -2
      oldsman1957

      I was always proud that Canada has its own independent domestic policy.
      1. quote
        quote 21 December 2015 16: 51 New
        +2
        Quote: gladcu2
        oldsman1957

        I was always proud that Canada has its own independent domestic policy.

        Do you seriously, think so? Well, ..... who believes.
        1. gladcu2
          gladcu2 21 December 2015 17: 53 New
          +1
          I traveled the USA along and across. I spoke with people and I know their point of view.

          They are pleased to note that Canada has a more stable and balanced model of society. Canada has more socialism.
          1. PHANTOM-AS
            PHANTOM-AS 21 December 2015 18: 25 New
            -4
            Quote: gladcu2
            Canada has more socialism.

            Now there is more socialism everywhere except the Russian Federation, the CIS, and a dozen African countries.
            And we are really rolling back into primeval feudalism, but without formalized slavery.
            1. Baloo
              Baloo 29 December 2015 22: 49 New
              0
              PHANTOM-AS And we really roll back to primeval feudalism, but without formalized slavery

              It’s you phantom rolls away. So roll on down Little Spasskaya ... D .... ... q
            2. The comment was deleted.
  4. gg.na
    gg.na 21 December 2015 13: 01 New
    0
    I didn’t understand much from the article .... what Or rather, I did not understand anything. Can repeat i'm a woodpecker maybe lol So! In general, what is being done there in America, so now we all must do the same ?! With what fright then we owe someone ?! Let them there even jump from the roofs of skyscrapers, we will not repeat them like parrots! Do not wait! no
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 16: 01 New
      0
      gg.na

      The fact that you did not understand anything from the article is certainly regrettable.

      And the fact that you wrote complete nonsense, and they put you a plus, it says that you are not the only one.

      The Russian Federation is an almost exact copy of the United States on the internal structure.

      Even Canada has significant differences Prime models.
  5. Gorinich
    Gorinich 21 December 2015 13: 07 New
    +3
    Everything is simple here, the USSR disappeared and the middle class was no longer needed.
  6. vobels
    vobels 21 December 2015 13: 20 New
    +3
    ".. And now - the most important thing. The logical continuation of this rollback to" pre-individualism "is the creation of new communities at the bottom of the social pyramid. Including in the form of clans, mafias and triads .." And if this is an inevitable milestone in the development of society, then I would like to first go through the stage of strengthening the family (clan) community, family values. And there you look and avoid criminal communities.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 16: 04 New
      0
      vobels

      Logically you wrote.

      Nevertheless, the author’s phrase most of all reflects my inner essence.

      Quote

      the person has become better and more “perspective” to live alone. "Surviving, being attached not to a vast kin (religious community, village), but to their own qualifications."
  7. vel1163
    vel1163 21 December 2015 13: 34 New
    +1
    Maybe someone from today's elite would like it to be so. But I do not believe in the reality of this, since the very foundation of capitalism assumes the existence of a middle class that could consume things with high added value. Roughly speaking, if everyone is poor then there will be no mass production, there will be no mass production, we will again ride horses. It is unprofitable and impossible to produce processors in single copies. Plus, the training of specialists, etc.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 17: 19 New
      0
      vel1163

      I’ll add one more non-obvious thing to your notis.

      Moreover, this golden percentage also cannot live comfortably. They have to constantly fight among themselves for the safety of the acquired. And this will continue indefinitely. And even when there is only one single winner, then he will not be able to stop until he kills all living things, competitive in the struggle for his life.
      This is how the system works. Competition, his mother ... And a synonym for her is war, the struggle for intraspecific survival.
  8. cap
    cap 21 December 2015 14: 07 New
    +1
    The most unexpected effect of social stagnation during a period of deep global crisis will be (suddenly) a crisis of individualism.
    Individualism became a direct consequence of the industrial age - and it can exist only as long as the "industrial effect" works. In the post-industrial era, when the number of people employed in mass production is constantly decreasing, and new technological leaps that would create new sectors of the economy and new mega-production with hundreds of thousands of hard workers each are not foreseen - in such an era, the value and bonuses of individualism plummet.
    Author Victor Marakhovsky
    The brains (USA) and hands (China) are spread across the continents. The main question remains how to ensure growing consumption, with a lack of resources for both. They are distributed "incorrectly." All current geopolitics can be considered only from this point of view. The Mafia have long resolved their "personnel" issues, and the question of resources is like in the banal "gop stop" scene, "who is stronger is right." The principals in this struggle are leaders of states that represent national elites with nominal rights to resources within their territories.
    The struggle for resources on a global scale, if we believe that the classics who described the contradictions in the era of imperialism are right, will once again lead to a world war. In this confrontation, there can be no talk of any individualism.
    He simply does not have a place in this struggle for the rights to capital or inheritance, except in the trench, with a grenade against the tank (this is where individualism is needed). hi
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 17: 30 New
      -1
      cap

      They wrote a lot with beautiful words. And the point of their reflection did not lead to the ultimate goal.

      Individualism embedded in morality is the main problem that makes capitalism a regressive system.

      Capitalism is a system of intraspecific struggle. And the strongest individual survives, who will devour or kill his peers.

      Democracy, this ideology, which is a screen, creates legal support for intraspecific lawlessness.

      The next social generation should be socialism. Which already twice loudly declared itself as the most effective system for the growth of human society. With the help of socialism, Russia and the USSR twice revived from the mud and rose from their knees. And they bent the capitalists to the fullest. Socialism can be attributed to an ideological superstructure in the form of communism, or the ideology of democracy can be trumped. So that the masses do not deny compromised ideologies.
  9. CHILD
    CHILD 21 December 2015 14: 22 New
    +2
    as taught in the USSR .... their middle class, the support of the state was necessary in opposition to the movements of the lower classes .... now this is not a threat due to a number of political, financial and technological reasons ..... as a result, after the collapse of the Union, the middle class began to gradually suffocate .... but in our country it didn’t really have time to appear))))
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 17: 39 New
      +1
      CHILD

      The middle class is not an artificial entity based solely on ideology. The middle class is a product of an economic form. Capitalism, in principle, cannot have a middle class. The whole middle class that was (whether there was also a question) in the USA is the result of the social successes of the USSR. This is an attempt to imitate.

      The middle class in the USSR was not as highly wealthy as the middle class in the West is considered to be. But the Soviet people were absolutely financially independent in the vast majority. Which, along with state social guarantees, made them the middle class.
  10. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 21 December 2015 14: 36 New
    +2
    Nice try, I liked it. Deserved plus!
    But, in my opinion, what the author wanted to say is noticeable - he didn’t quite succeed, or it turned out messy, but the thought escapes ...
    So many controversial conclusions!
    The article needs serious revision.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 21 December 2015 17: 47 New
      0
      Volzhanin

      All these conversations in search of truth revolve around two basic principles.

      This is individualism, as the moral basis of capitalism.
      And collectivism, as the moral basis of socialism.

      Capitalism is a regressive, consumer form. Kills a person with intraspecific struggle.

      Socialism is a progressive form, a collective form of the joint striving towards a better future.

      The paradox is the loss of the socialist system in the form of self-destruction, as a form that has not reached perfection.

      Unfortunately, it was not possible to work out a panacea from the traitors of the individualists. Who immediately took the opportunity to plunder the public.
  11. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 21 December 2015 15: 11 New
    0
    And mutual assistance in the new, poor, middle-aged, caste and warring world is very much in demand. It in all its forms - from the most touching to the most terrible - always arises where the ruling minorities view the majority as “born to be a victim”.


    The author’s thought is interesting, I completely agree with her. Never before in history did “born to be a victim” support the ruling minority in difficult times. And I think that it would be inappropriate to recall the Great Patriotic War in this situation, then the "relationship" between the authorities and the people had a slightly different orientation, and then there were neither Rotenbergs, nor Abramovichs with the Waxilbergs. Everyone lived not richly and there was not such a “wild” difference between classes in the USSR.
    Something like that, colleagues. hi
  12. Begemot
    Begemot 21 December 2015 15: 18 New
    +1
    The author plus for trying to comprehend. I will add a little: Capital in its desire to surpass civilization development Socialism has created an immense amount of restrictions and rules itself. Their number exceeded the critical mass and it is impossible to comply with their capital alone, while maintaining competitiveness. Therefore, zones of lawlessness are created in order to do their work there without any restrictions, the benefit of useful idiots who are ready to serve as a full guard and their services are cheaper than the cost of complying with laws. So they appeared in the form that we see Afghanistan, Albania, the former Kosovo, b. Libya, b. Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Ukraine, etc. And all sorts of criminal cases (such as drug trafficking) - they simply do not experience any problems. Own rules have become a burden and the abolition of restrictions on bankruptcy by the IMF in the same series. Our deputies have not realized this until now and continue to drive “legislative noodles”, driving our economy into a dead end of self-restraint. But in general, the author is right: the times of individualism are ending, rapidly, mainly because capital has ceased to be needed sovereign states, they are subject to destruction and soon no one can guarantee the safety of residents not only in Africa, Asia or BV, but also in old Europe and in America. Russia, China, India can still survive, but they do not care about the rest and restore order to their neighbors is a thankless task.
    So people in "civilized" countries will have to get together in groups and groups, a fact, this is already happening. The palette of platforms uniting these groups will be interesting: Islam (already started - ISIS), Nazism - we also observe in banderlogy, and in Europe, in North Africa, the devil will break his leg.
  13. Mexovoy
    Mexovoy 21 December 2015 15: 33 New
    +2
    Pereslegin had similar thoughts, 5 years ago. The bottom line is that people will unite on new grounds. For example, pick-pickers, fishermen, Topvar residents, car owners, etc. Due to communication on the Internet, people will be united according to their interests.
  14. gladcu2
    gladcu2 21 December 2015 18: 03 New
    0
    In short, to summarize.

    All the devastation in people's heads consists in a constant struggle to justify capitalism as a CREATIVE system, which in fact is not.

    But socialism, which in the USSR crashed as a result of the incompleteness of the model. Which recreated and raised the country from the ashes several times, is just that promising next model to which we must strive.
  15. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 21 December 2015 18: 32 New
    0
    I read the article and wanted to in the Neolithic, to a stone ax and a hairy female. AND
    in general, all this is sad, similar to the decline of humanity and the death of civilization.
  16. Nikolay K
    Nikolay K 21 December 2015 22: 55 New
    0
    Now on our planet there is a really big differentiation in income among people, but I don’t see a problem in this, this is a completely NATURAL process. Firstly, it should be understood that the higher the level of material well-being of mankind, the more “extra” material goods that can be accumulated as savings by individuals. In a primitive society, there is no accumulation, and there is no social stratification. Apparently for someone this is the perfect society. Secondly, apparently you forgot that back in the middle of the last century, many states lived in the era of feudalism. Yes, they are slowly catching up with economically developed powers, but understandably, the income of a citizen of Germany and Chad is an incomparable amount. Thirdly, in economically developed countries there is a drop in the birth rate, i.e. people live "for themselves", while in the average African family there are 2-3 times more children, and income is divided into all. Finally, I believe that the level of income differentiation depends on what stage of economic development the state is at. In the era of the initial accumulation of capital and undeveloped competition (wild capitalism), as it is now in Russia, population incomes differ significantly. As the social system develops and economic growth slows, income differentiation will also fall, as is now happening in Germany or Scandinavia. So, I repeat, this process is natural and, I hope, we will survive it without the mafia and other revolutions.
  17. looker-on
    looker-on 22 December 2015 00: 35 New
    0
    The idea of ​​socialism as a whole is good and correct. But it does not work on the condition of money as part of the formula. Give three citizens 100 each — they will very quickly divide into 3 classes. One will drink and become a beggar. The second will simply eat 50 and 50 will be kept in stocking (medium) The third will offer something to the first and then the second and will become higher than them in class (they will begin to exploit) and if it does not increase, then it will receive more if only in the form of labor of two. Well, if there is a fourth and he is not God, then he is the very "golden percentage" that controls everyone who is lower.

    It doesn’t work, humanity checked.

    Need to give up money. And how to replace them is not clear. Labor? Science?
  18. Concealer
    Concealer 22 December 2015 13: 10 New
    0
    This is hundreds of robots will fight. Other hundreds will make parts of combat robots, and others will develop them.

    A simple question is who will develop these same robots. The question is not as simple as it seems at first glance. But in it the whole essence of the post-industrial model of production.
    Individualism was a direct consequence of the industrial era - and can exist only as long as the "industrial effect" works.

    Wow, the egoism era is ending. It ends because even simple production tasks are more difficult for one person. Now people can solve production problems only collectively. Modern production is knowledge-intensive, and at the heart of its colossal knowledge and intellectual labor. And here we come back to the first question, and who will develop new products?
    The joke of history is that ALL will have to work now. The joke of the modern economy is that owning the means of production is no longer profitable. They have become too complicated. And technology began to require just a fantastic level of knowledge. Technology is beginning to turn into art, not accessible to everyone.
    That's why everyone will have to work. Work for everyone, for the appearance of those units for which modern technologies that have become art are accessible and understandable. The emergence of those who are capable and able to create new technologies and products. But for this, it is necessary to provide the means of production to ALL.
    And here begins the organization of new communities and a new economic model generated by the post-industrial model of social production.
    The choice is ours, development and a post-industrial society, or degradation and a new mafia. And it's time to make a choice.
  19. Alisher
    Alisher 23 December 2015 00: 38 New
    0
    Interesting article and interesting comments. But if you try to look even further ahead, you can already see how corporations are beginning to crush any state, especially in the United States. Monopoly is the highest degree of capitalism, and the division of consumers into different national states is no longer necessary for them, and the anti-globalists have already realized this.
    The ruling elites (owners of corporations) are much easier to divide the spheres of interests among themselves, for example, food producers do not need to compete with arms producers, etc. After that, you don’t need to invest in the real development of technology, it is enough to simulate it or to do it very slowly, beating off the maximum income from each technology.
    Some specialists, such as IT specialists, can go to work from corporation to corporation - they have higher salaries, they are middle class. And narrow specialists can be squeezed in the salary, and in the field of professional activity. Let a scientist or journalist try to go against the "common" (necessary) opinion - he will not find work anymore, since competition has already been minimized. At the same time, particularly bright (useful) personalities can go not only into the middle, but also into the upper class.
    The mafia is also subject to this effect, and also globalizes. Accordingly, it will also strive to share specialization, but act on a global scale.
    Social programs will be phased out, to the extent that corporations need: in medicine - so that there are no epidemics, the rest is paid, in training - a minimum level of knowledge.
    And the flow of refugees to Europe only contributes to the destruction of nation states, a decrease in the middle class and an increase in the role of corporations. WTO, transoceanic partnerships serve the same purpose. Wars and terrorists also contribute, especially if there is no victorious side (Pyrrhic victory).