Military Review

The Western coalition does not deny that one of the airstrikes could have led to the death of Iraqi soldiers

45
The Western Coalition Command acknowledged that the Iraqi military may have died from an inadvertent strike aviation in the Falluji area, passes RIA News.


The Western coalition does not deny that one of the airstrikes could have led to the death of Iraqi soldiers


“Acting upon request and according to information provided by the Iraqi security forces on the site in Fallujah, the coalition forces launched several air strikes against the Islamic State (DAISH). Despite coordination with the Iraqi security forces on the ground, according to preliminary reports, there is a possibility that one of the air strikes led to the death of Iraqi soldiers ",
the report said.

“We will conduct a thorough investigation to establish all the facts. We sent a formal invitation to Iraq to participate in the investigation, ”clarified the headquarters of Operation Unshakable Resolve.

Earlier, a spokesman for the Iraqi parliament said that "US air forces inflicted an airstrike on the city of al-Naimiyya south-west of the city of Fallujah," which resulted in "injuring at least 30 55 soldiers, 20 injured.
Photos used:
AFP 2015 / Ali Al Saadi
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 19 December 2015 13: 21 New
    +8
    Interestingly, how can one deny looking at corpses and evidence of satellite images?
    1. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 19 December 2015 13: 27 New
      +6
      We sent a formal invitation to Iraq to participate in the investigation.

      "... и нечего соваться (формальное есть формальное). А убитые - так это выравнивание сил.
      "Бедные" игиловцы и десятой части техники не имеют, а вы их как бьёте !"
      I understand the response of the command of the coalition forces.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 19 December 2015 14: 10 New
        +5
        From the text of the article
        The Western Coalition Command admitted that the Iraqi military may have died from an unintentional strike by an aircraft in the Falluji region,

        А выставить сразу «мазиле»-«союзничку» ДЕНЕЖНЫЙ счёт-иск – за свыше 30 человек убитых и 20 человек раненных среди военнослужащих ВС Ирака и за их разбитую и повреждённую военную технику! И чтобы ДЕНЕЖНЫЙ счёт-иск был НЕ маленьким! Т.е. раздуть СКАНДАЛ до ДЕНЕЖНЫХ компенсаций на ВЕСЬ мир! Что НЕ нужны ВС Ирака и ВС Сирии такие "союзнички" в Сирии и Ираке по "борьбе" против ИГИЛ. При этом официально принять "промахи" союзников за систему СОЗНАТЕЛЬНЫХ просчётов.
      2. INVESTOR
        INVESTOR 19 December 2015 14: 29 New
        +4
        You learn, what garbage, 30 corpses ... especially natives .. damned hypocrites.
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 19 December 2015 15: 06 New
          11
          Quote: INVESTOR
          You learn, what garbage, 30 corpses ... especially natives .. damned hypocrites.

          But how dare the natives offend the good guys from Daesh, because these guys supply stolen and cheap oil, and then the Iraqi army dared to repel several oil wells. Mattresses will even invite Iraqis to investigate this matter.
          formal invitation to participate in the investigation ”

          Formal keyword, here you have the beads and go away. One word cattle are star-striped.
        2. Denis Obukhov
          Denis Obukhov 19 December 2015 15: 38 New
          +3
          Quote: INVESTOR
          You learn, what garbage, 30 corpses ... especially natives .. damned hypocrites.



          У США в этой войне только политические цели. На "сопутствующие потери" они даже внимания не обращают.
          1. cniza
            cniza 19 December 2015 16: 34 New
            +3
            Quote: Denis Obukhov
            Quote: INVESTOR
            You learn, what garbage, 30 corpses ... especially natives .. damned hypocrites.



            У США в этой войне только политические цели. На "сопутствующие потери" они даже внимания не обращают.


            Well, another plus to earn money, without it in any way.
          2. The comment was deleted.
    2. MIKHALYCH1
      MIKHALYCH1 19 December 2015 13: 29 New
      +4
      Quote: dchegrinec
      Interestingly, how can one deny looking at corpses and evidence of satellite images?

      Pupils are good at them .. Kill! Slavs ... our
      Parallel...
      1. kil 31
        kil 31 19 December 2015 13: 41 New
        +2
        Всё как обычно. Иракцы люди третьего сорта. Вон человек уже второго сорта "пудель Буша" в Иракской компании верещал, как кастрированый. Мы союзники почему вы разбомбили наши колоны и танки. Буш даже не извинился, просто сказал; Авиации США не понятно чем отличается "Челенджер" от Т-56.
      2. Truth
        Truth 19 December 2015 13: 49 New
        +4
        По теме "дружественного огня" американцы являются самыми крупными и непревзойдёнными специалистами, в "Буре в пустыне" они своих накосили нехило.
        But in this case, the bastard entity is somehow clearly visible, it somehow somehow suspiciously hit the Iraqis, when they, in turn, so successfully shook the ISIS.
        1. Grandfather Luka
          Grandfather Luka 19 December 2015 15: 17 New
          0
          На счёт "специалистов" согласен. А иракцы пусть себе тщательней союзников выбирают. По мере возможности конечно.
          And in the photo, is it a parade or are they attacking like that?
    3. little girl15
      little girl15 19 December 2015 13: 56 New
      +1
      А отрицать бессмысленно.Так-как доказывается легко.Главное теперь этой матрасной "коалиции" сохранить свой "фейс"девственно чистым.Хотя этой мерзкой физиономии сделать это очень затруднительно.
    4. INVESTOR
      INVESTOR 19 December 2015 14: 27 New
      0
      The Western coalition is not shy about the fact that one of the air strikes could lead to the death of Iraqi troops.

      it will be more correct.
    5. Grandfather Luka
      Grandfather Luka 19 December 2015 14: 38 New
      0
      As far as I know, no one denies. The blow was delivered. If you ask for the support of aviation or artillery, wait until they finish working, and do not break the enemy who faltered to catch up. This is a typical example of a lack of coordination in the troops. And we used to get burned when, on already occupied positions, belatedly, we started to play our own art. So, I think it’s not worthwhile in this case to draw non-humans from Americans again. Friendly fire however.
    6. novobranets
      novobranets 19 December 2015 15: 03 New
      +1
      Пока их не приперли к стенке, они божились, что бомбили в 50 км от этого места -"Не наши были самолеты, не наши, мамой клянусь". Тьфу, подонки.
    7. EvgNik
      EvgNik 19 December 2015 15: 04 New
      0
      Quote: dchegrinec
      how can one deny looking at corpses and evidence of satellite images

      Can. To do this, you just do not have to look at the pictures, or declare these pictures the results of the Russian bombardment.
    8. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 19 December 2015 15: 35 New
      0
      Как всегда у США пустословие.. "Непреднамеренно"... "Ошибка в расчетах"... "Не скоординировали действия"... И с кем они хоть когда-нибудь координировались?! Ни с кем, потому что у них "самая точная" разведка! Которая "не ошибается"... К сожалению, очень часто почему-то... И при этом США имеют наглость утверждать, что Российские ВВС "80% своих авиаударов наносят по умеренной оппозиции, и только 20% непосредственно по террористам"! Здесь тоже сведения их хваленой разведки?!

    9. Sterlya
      Sterlya 19 December 2015 17: 48 New
      +1
      And THESE They tell us that picking your nose is not decent? wassat Fighters blin. That wedding is the hospital. it’s eternal fire in its own way.
      I'm not talking about excavators. After the start of the operation of the Western coalition. They say in Syria and Iraq the most dangerous profession - Excavator! wassat
  2. avvg
    avvg 19 December 2015 13: 23 New
    +8
    Americans, as always, bomb those who successfully fight terrorists-Daesh (ISIS), openly help terrorists.
    1. onix757
      onix757 19 December 2015 13: 30 New
      0
      terrorists DAISH

      I ask for pardon, and who are these daishas and how do they differ from the Islamic state (igil)?
      1. Egor123
        Egor123 19 December 2015 13: 36 New
        +2
        DAISH - this is the same ISIS, the only way it is called in Muslim countries.
        1. onix757
          onix757 19 December 2015 13: 52 New
          +2
          And why do we call it as is customary in Muslim countries. Are we a Muslim country?
          1. Kos_kalinki9
            Kos_kalinki9 19 December 2015 14: 10 New
            +1
            Quote: onix757
            And why do we call it as is customary in Muslim countries. Are we a Muslim country?

            We have a secular state. But in Russia, out of 140 ml. people of the order of 21 ml. Muslims. In the whole world, 18-20% of earthlings are Muslims.
            1. onix757
              onix757 19 December 2015 14: 14 New
              -1
              Quote: Kos_kalinki9
              But in Russia, out of 140 ml. people of the order of 21 ml. Muslims

              Or 15%. Should we all speak the language of 15%?
              1. Kos_kalinki9
                Kos_kalinki9 19 December 2015 14: 43 New
                +3
                Quote: onix757
                Quote: Kos_kalinki9
                But in Russia, out of 140 ml. people of the order of 21 ml. Muslims

                Or 15%. Should we all speak the language of 15%?

                Do not start a dispute about anything. And then the language and religion? Like you call igil igil, flag in hand. For me, that igil, that daish, that al-Qaeda-killer terrorists. Everything. And a little more about languages. Something is tormenting me with vague doubts that the Chechen from Grozny will understand the Tatar from Kazan if everyone speaks his own language. But Obama Muslims. hi
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 19 December 2015 15: 06 New
                  +1
                  onix757 (2)
                  I ask for pardon, and who are these daishas and how do they differ from the Islamic state (igil)?
                  But in Russia from 140 ml. man of order 21 mln. Muslims. Or 15%. Should we all speak 15%?

                  I, too, at one time became interested in renaming ISIS, ISIS, for DANSH. I rummaged on the Internet - and here is some help from 1.12.2015. I found.
                  The world media are abandoning the familiar designation of a terrorist group in order to prevent militants from acting on behalf of Islam. It is reported by LifeNews. The new abbreviation DAISH often began to appear in the media space.
                  In Russia, ISIS is abbreviated as Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Levant is the geographical name of the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea: Syria, Libya, Palestine, Israel and Jordan). DAISH - Daesh (Daiish or Da'esh) is an abbreviation for the name of the extremist organization al-Dawla al-Islamiya al-Iraq al-Sham - the same "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant." But this version of pronunciation is not perceived by the terrorists themselves, who threaten to cut off languages ​​to those who thus pronounce the name of the group. The fact is that it is consonant with the Arabic words daes (“stamping / crushing feet”) and dahes (“sowing discord / destruction”). This annoying militant abbreviation is becoming the most commonly used not only by the Arab, but also the media around the world.
                  The terrorists call themselves the "Islamic State", implying a reference to the caliphate - the state ruled by the caliph, which in Arabic means "successor".
                  http://www.glavny.tv/news/10409
                  1. Dryuya2
                    Dryuya2 19 December 2015 17: 17 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    I, too, at one time became interested in renaming ISIS, ISIS, for DANSH. Rummaged through the Internet

                    winked
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. EvgNik
              EvgNik 19 December 2015 15: 14 New
              +1
              Quote: Kos_kalinki9
              But in Russia, out of 140 ml. people of the order of 21 ml. Muslims

              So what? I have a relative Tatar, I have friends, and no one demands to immediately rename ISIS. It is the radicals who demand it. So let's be tolerant and stop bombing them. To please those who do not like the success of the videoconferencing.
              1. Kos_kalinki9
                Kos_kalinki9 19 December 2015 15: 57 New
                0
                Quote: EvgNik
                Quote: Kos_kalinki9
                But in Russia, out of 140 ml. people of the order of 21 ml. Muslims

                So what? I have a relative Tatar, I have friends, and no one demands to immediately rename ISIS. It is the radicals who demand it. So let's be tolerant and stop bombing them. To please those who do not like the success of the videoconferencing.

                A similar situation with the Tatars and mine. And I just answered the question.
                onix757 (2) RU Today, 13:52 ↑
                And why do we call it as is customary in Muslim countries. Are we a Muslim country?
              2. onix757
                onix757 19 December 2015 16: 10 New
                0
                Quote: EvgNik
                So what? I have a relative Tatar, I have friends, and no one demands to immediately rename ISIS. It is the radicals who demand it

                Well, demanding it is too much, but the fact that there is an imposition of terms, for the sake of some social groups, is very noticeable.
                The chairman of the Presidium of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of the European part of Russia, the chairman of the Council of Muftis of Russia, Sheikh Ravil Gainutdin, also emphasized that it would be right to speak and write Daesh, and not ISIS.
                Is this the reason?
      2. Aureol
        Aureol 19 December 2015 14: 32 New
        +2
        ад-Даулят аль-Исламийя фи-ль-Ирак ва-ш-Шам - (ДАИШ) Исламское государство Ирака и Шама (Леванта). Всего на одну букву отличается от арабского слова "даэс" - разрушитель, подавитель. Получается вроде как сказать "гамнодав". Обидно честному террористу и неблагозвучно звучит для арабов.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 December 2015 13: 25 New
    +1
    А в Сирии отрицать очевидно просто необходимо. К иракцам относятся как закулисной помойке, поэтому можно признать "ошибку". В Сирии Россия, поэтому "ошибки" лучше не признавать, либо спокойно замалчивать. Одним словом у.р.о.д.ы - по жизни и определению.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. sober
    sober 19 December 2015 13: 27 New
    +2
    That bastard then wound up !!! And who will find the council on them ??? Indeed, it DOESN’T HAPPEN in life, you have to answer for everything !!!!!!
  6. samarin1969
    samarin1969 19 December 2015 13: 34 New
    +1
    Хорошо бы и иракцам "промахнуться"...
  7. MIKHALYCH1
    MIKHALYCH1 19 December 2015 13: 36 New
    +8
    Damn the pancake, run into!
  8. Masya masya
    Masya masya 19 December 2015 13: 36 New
    +3
    «Мы проведём тщательное расследование, чтобы установить все факты. Мы направили Ираку формальное приглашение участвовать в расследовании», а итоги расследования- " извини дорогая, так получилось?"
  9. brasist
    brasist 19 December 2015 13: 37 New
    0
    What the hell is it and they would admit to investigating that it was intentional, because such scum actions anyway someday for a strip coalition will turn into a wooden mac ...
  10. Egor123
    Egor123 19 December 2015 13: 37 New
    0
    Пора уже промахиваться не только "Западной коалиции". Почему бы Ираку не промахнуться по туркам?
  11. wicked pinnochio
    wicked pinnochio 19 December 2015 13: 47 New
    0
    yeah yeah that's because pi don’t know who
  12. gop
    gop 19 December 2015 13: 51 New
    0
    Quote: onix757
    and who are these daishas and how do they differ from the Islamic state (igil)?

    это другое название ИГ типа как: "ВКС РФ" и "ВКС ослочпоков", и тут тоже самое, ИГ это круто , а "ослочпоки" не очень вот и сменили абревиатуру
  13. Kelwin
    Kelwin 19 December 2015 13: 52 New
    +1
    Нормальная такая формулировка "иракские военные, возможно, погибли от непреднамеренного удара". Возможно от удара, а возможно и от сифилиса, хз. "Непреднамеренно" так взвели дуру, и "случайно" ее уронили, ну руки кривые - бывает. Вот с*ки матрасные, когда осиновый кол зайдет, мы то же скажем - непреднамеренно, так получилось...
  14. Starik72
    Starik72 19 December 2015 13: 56 New
    +3
    They bombed Yugoslavia and destroyed it, stirred up Iraq to create chaos there, created snake vipers in Afghanistan and Libya, climb like cracks in all cracks, they can do anything. When will these exceptional STATES be expelled or forced not to impose their opinions and actions ???
  15. Termit1309
    Termit1309 19 December 2015 14: 22 New
    0
    Quote: dchegrinec
    Interestingly, how can one deny looking at corpses and evidence of satellite images?

    Something like that. take and deny. In an interesting time we live. It's a pity if we find out how this will end.
    https://youtu.be/Ya-iYpPUBf0?t=21
    And we left the pine boxes, we bring death to the worlds ...
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 19 December 2015 15: 19 New
      0
      Quote: Termit1309
      It's a pity if we find out how this will end.

      It would be better if this is not recognized and our great-great-great-great -....... great-grandchildren.
  16. pvv113
    pvv113 19 December 2015 15: 39 New
    0
    We will conduct a thorough investigation to establish all the facts.

    As far as I remember, the Anglo-Saxons have not yet completed a single investigation
  17. Kelwin
    Kelwin 19 December 2015 16: 12 New
    +1
    Here, with RT

    "Глава Пентагона Эштон Картер назвал «ошибкой обеих сторон» удар ВВС США, в результате которого погибли девять солдат армии Ирака. Об этом сообщает агентство The Associated Press."

    Original news RT in Russian:
    https://russian.rt.com/article/137706

    It is clear that both sides made a mistake - the guys were no longer on the planet. The same thing to go to the country fearfully, suddenly wrong? Pipe finally.
  18. tanit
    tanit 19 December 2015 16: 23 New
    +1
    Low training pilots. And low discipline. I saw a group of people beat (and why do the flight mission, they will shoot at you there). And then they’ll smear you.
    Global conspiracy? No - the local idiocy of command and the personal cowardice of the pilots.
  19. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 19 December 2015 17: 17 New
    -1
    Есть и новости газета "Известия" от 19.12.2015
    The countries of Europe and Turkey have closed their skies for Russian long-range aircraft, striking at Daesh terrorists in Syria. Russian pilots were forced to lay a route bypassing Europe. This was announced on December 19 by the deputy commander of long-range aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, Major General Anatoly Konovalov.

    Read further: http://izvestia.ru/news/599864#ixzz3um8wpCNZ


    All this, attacks on the Armed Forces of Syria, Iraq, Provocation with SU-24, Even the UN resolution -
    THIS IS ONE PLANNED OPERATION OF THE USA!
    aimed at overthrowing Assad in order to plant his puppets, to strengthen his influence in the Middle East!
    The next goal (if Syria falls) will be Iran! Ultimate Saudi Arabia!
    IMHO!
    1. The black
      The black 19 December 2015 18: 01 New
      +2
      [/ quote] All this, attacks on the Armed Forces of Syria, Iraq, Provocation with SU-24, Even the UN resolution -
      THIS IS ONE PLANNED OPERATION OF THE USA!
      aimed at overthrowing Assad in order to plant his puppets, to strengthen his influence in the Middle East!
      The next goal (if Syria falls) will be Iran! Ultimate Saudi Arabia!
      IMHO! [/ quote]
      In general, I agree. The only question is in what order are the Saudis-Iranians or vice versa. The goal of the Sha is obvious - control over Middle Eastern oil. Therefore, neither strong Turkey, nor strong Saudi Arabia, nor strong Iran, are needed.
      1. Ruswolf
        Ruswolf 19 December 2015 18: 40 New
        0
        The black
        Therefore, neither strong Turkey, nor strong Saudi Arabia, nor strong Iran, are needed.

        I totally agree with you!
        And who do they need at all? If only as slaves?
        Идеология фашисткой германии! "Немцы должны наслаждаться жизнью, остальные должны обеспечивать эту жизнь" А надзирать за рабами должны свои палачи.
        Therefore, the overseer will be, I think CA. She will be left for later. The reason is obvious, it is weak, but with a good host it can bark. Here again, the Islamization of BV but under the control of the United States.
        Do not twist and do not rearrange the terms one result!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  20. sontinianin
    sontinianin 19 December 2015 18: 27 New
    0
    Double standards on the face, I’m even afraid to imagine what would happen if we got into the wrong ones !!!
  21. wandlitz
    wandlitz 19 December 2015 22: 28 New
    +1
    Western Coalition Command acknowledges Iraqi military may have died from unintentional strike
    Yes, what is there from unintentional .... There is no doubt, they hit where they aimed.
  22. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 20 December 2015 11: 08 New
    0
    Americans bombed strictly at the point that
    received from the Iraqi command, and the Iraqis recognized this.
    The trouble is that the point had already taken
    unit of the advancing Iraqi army pursuing
    action movies.
    The Iraqis made a mistake: they did not cancel the mission.
    The Americans made a mistake: did not ask for confirmation on the task
    immediately before departure. Several hours passed from the assignment to departure.
    9 Iraqi soldiers and one officer were killed.
  23. datur
    datur 20 December 2015 23: 06 New
    0
    yeah! -It's American-bomb those who destroy this whole gang !!! wink