Military Review

Until the end of the year, the VKS will receive a batch of new Su-34 bombers, as well as upgraded attack aircraft Su-25M3

48
The Russian Aerospace Forces before the end of this year will receive another 4 bomber Su-34, reports MIC with reference to Interfax-AVN.




"Novosibirsk aviation production association named after V.P. Chkalov is ready to hand over four more Su-34 bombers to the military, ”a representative of the Novosibirsk Region Administration told the agency.

“Two Su-34s will go to the troops as part of the final delivery on the 2015 state defense order of the year, and two over the plan,” he clarified.

According to the interlocutor, "now in the composition of the Air Comic Forces of Russia are already around 80 Novosibirsk aircraft Su-34, of which 10 is currently actively used by the Russian aviation group in Syria when attacking the infrastructure of the group ISIL (DAISH)."

Interfax-AVN also announced the completion of the modernization of the first batch of Su-25 attack aircraft, designated as Su-25СМ3.

“The first batch of Su-121 attack aircraft in the“ technical person ”Su-25СМ25 has been modernized at the 3 aircraft repair plant in Kubinka near Moscow,” said a source in the military-industrial complex.

He said that "the delivery of attack aircraft to the Air and Space Forces of Russia will take place before the end of this year." How many aircraft will be delivered, the source did not specify.

According to the source, “the version of the Su-25CM3 attack aircraft significantly differs not only from the front-line Su-25, but also from the previously upgraded Su-25CM due to the use of new radio-electronic equipment and aircraft weapons.
Photos used:
Vadim, russianplanes.net
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. avvg
    avvg 17 December 2015 16: 04 New
    16
    SU-34 Great powerful machine! Great aerodynamics and excellent maneuverability!
    1. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 17 December 2015 16: 08 New
      14
      Probably the result of modernization is the use in Syria (take into account experience). Good job!
      1. DarkMatter
        DarkMatter 17 December 2015 18: 53 New
        +9
        Su-25cm3 has long been developed, long before Syria.

        And
        RIA Novosti 13.11.2014
        Sixteen of the latest Su-25SM3 aircraft entered service with the air regiment of the Southern Military District (South Military District) in the Krasnodar Territory, the press service of the Southern Military District reported on Thursday.

        "В рамках гособоронзаказа на вооружение штурмового авиационного полка первой гвардейской смешанной авиационной дивизии ЮВО в Краснодарском крае поступило 16 новейших самолетов Су-25СМ3 "Грач", сменивших своего предшественника, ранее стоявшего на вооружении Су-25", — говорится в сообщении.

        And these say the first batch here, are they all lost there or what?
        And it’s not clear who is lying No.

        Or is it specifically the first batch from this factory what
    2. vkl-47
      vkl-47 17 December 2015 16: 13 New
      +5
      what a handsome man in the photo and not the plane
      1. Rostovchanin
        Rostovchanin 17 December 2015 16: 34 New
        34
        Already laid out, but it hurts a good little devil !!!
        1. Talgat
          Talgat 17 December 2015 18: 44 New
          +6
          The world is getting tighter

          Of course, it is good that our Kazakhstan began to purchase Su-30 and c-300 in addition to the old ones

          As long as there is money, it would not be bad to buy Su 34 - as they say in Russia, hope for it - but don’t be too bad. all of a sudden tomorrow it will become so intense that it will be necessary to figure out for ourselves what time.

          And God forbid, an attack from the west, then you will have to remember the times of the Panfilov division - but you don’t even want to think about it - pah pah, God forbid, God forbid to die Almaty and Kirghiz again near Moscow, I hope they will destroy and the strategic nuclear forces will save all the same
          1. UREC
            UREC 17 December 2015 21: 45 New
            +2
            If Russia will have faithful allies (at least from the former social republics - Kazakhs and Belarusians - a serious plus), no one will turn up 110 percent! And if the Americans didn’t even wash their heads with Ukrainians, then plus Ukraine. Together it would be some more power !!! Even good friends from the east with their billions of people would have thought differently.
          2. avt
            avt 17 December 2015 23: 05 New
            0
            Quote: Talgat
            While there is money, it would not be bad to buy and Su 34

            request In the 90s and early 32s they were offered all over the world under the Su-24 brand, so no one took it ... But right now everyone wanted to, and we have ONE factory doing them and even for ourselves we haven’t done the planned amount to replace the 24th . You have to wait a long time if it is very unbearable - take the modernized Su-34s, they also plow nothing for themselves in Syria along with the XNUMXth.
            Quote: Talgat
            . suddenly tomorrow it’s going to be so tense

            Under the nuclear umbrella of Russia in the framework of the CSTO!? Well, how do you completely mistrust GDP ?? Or in the steppe Crimea painted - like luring ?? laughing Байконур ваш и никто его штурмовать не будет из России, вон даже где то из задела ,,Зенит" раскопали и пальнули с площадки Байконура на радость НАНу.
            Quote: Talgat
            Of course, it’s good that our Kazakhstan began to buy Su-30

            Of course - a fighter can operate a machine on the ground, again new from the factory, and not like in the 90s, when they gave what was under restoration, thank God and the factory workers - regularly rivet new ones for themselves and for export.
            Quote: Talgat
            and s-300 additionally received to the old available

            Well, it’s like the site of new air defense factories will be operational and with this it will be easier - you can buy new complexes at domestic Russian prices, as members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, and not like before, when we were removed from duty on transmission with modernization, the little ykry were screwed up with components, but import substitution.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 17 December 2015 16: 20 New
      +6
      Su-34 in Latakia.



      clickable.
    4. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 17 December 2015 16: 38 New
      14
      I appeal to the VO administration, and there will be a report at the end of the year, how many units of aircraft equipment were delivered to the Air Force, how many ships to the Navy, and how many land equipment to the Ground Forces and Airborne Forces? hi
      1. Eugene-Eugene
        Eugene-Eugene 17 December 2015 21: 49 New
        +1
        If someone sends an article, they will lay out. But on this occasion it is better to drop in on bmpd, although I don’t think that there you will find complete information. Official sites do not give a complete picture. Someone, in any case, electronic tablets make up, with each news they bring in data for many years, but I did not stumble upon such comrades. Wiki does not count - digital nonsense of the owners of the pages devoted to armament, and their opposition to my attempts to eliminate it was instilled by a persistent dislike for this resource. Although the page of the list of ships of the Russian Navy, are, it seems, conscientious people.
    5. BABA SHURA
      BABA SHURA 17 December 2015 19: 02 New
      -4
      И "светится" за тысячу километров....
    6. Teplohod
      Teplohod 17 December 2015 20: 12 New
      +1
      Really impressive sight.
  2. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 17 December 2015 16: 05 New
    +4
    Just seem to plan to build 200 Su-34. Which will have to completely replace the Su-24.
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 17 December 2015 16: 17 New
      +5
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      Just seem to plan to build 200 Su-34. Which will have to completely replace the Su-24.

      200 Su-34 is not enough to replace all Su-24M in the ratio 1: 1.
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 17 December 2015 16: 26 New
        +4
        Quote: Bongo
        200 Su-34 is not enough to replace all Su-24M in the ratio 1: 1.

        The Encyclopedia of Enemies says that we now have 120 Su-24 of various modifications. what
        1. kapitan92
          kapitan92 17 December 2015 16: 31 New
          +9
          When fulfilling the defense order of 2015, the Air Force will have about 70 units of SU 34. Alas, this is so! Su 34 makes Novosibirsk. The plant’s capabilities make it possible to make about 30 cars a year, unfortunately.
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock 17 December 2015 16: 52 New
            +7
            Quote: kapitan92
            The plant’s capabilities make it possible to make about 30 cars a year, unfortunately.

            30 cars a year is not a bad indicator. For comparison, the US builds 48 F / A-18 Super Hornet per year.
          2. Prapor-527
            Prapor-527 17 December 2015 20: 32 New
            +2
            Quote: kapitan92
            When fulfilling the defense order of 2015, the Air Force will have about 70 units of SU 34. Alas, this is so! Su 34 makes Novosibirsk. The plant’s capabilities make it possible to make about 30 cars a year, unfortunately.

            NAZ them. V.P. Chkalova in Novosibirsk produces 16-18 cars a year ...
        2. Bongo
          Bongo 18 December 2015 05: 37 New
          +1
          Quote: Vladimirets
          The Encyclopedia of Enemies says that we now have 120 Su-24 of various modifications.

          С учётом тех, что "на хранении" до 200. Ещё 10 лет назад это количество было вдвое больше. Только в ДВО было "оптимизировано" три бап имевших на вооружении эти машины. Сейчас остался один 277-й бап в Хурбе. Но этого количества фронтовых бомбардировщиков для нашей страны абсолютно недостаточно. В своё время наши ВВС получили около 1200 Су-24 и Су-24М.
      2. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 17 December 2015 16: 58 New
        +3
        Quote: Bongo
        200 Su-34 is not enough to replace all Su-24M in the ratio 1: 1.

        200 cars are normal, in the USA, for comparison, 211 F-15 Strike Eagle in the Air Force + 80 in the National Guard. The total number is 291. We rarely have at least approximate parity with the United States on conventional weapons (except tanks, self-propelled guns, and MLRS, if I am not mistaken, when we have the advantage in numbers).
        1. Army1
          Army1 17 December 2015 19: 14 New
          +2
          Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
          Quote: Bongo
          200 Su-34 is not enough to replace all Su-24M in the ratio 1: 1.

          200 cars are normal, in the USA, for comparison, 211 F-15 Strike Eagle in the Air Force + 80 in the National Guard. The total number is 291. We rarely have at least approximate parity with the United States on conventional weapons (except tanks, self-propelled guns, and MLRS, if I am not mistaken, when we have the advantage in numbers).

          We have different approaches to the construction of the aircraft. The United States initially had a unification of machines, but how many front-line bombers we have, which essentially play the role of attack aircraft? 15
        2. Bongo
          Bongo 18 December 2015 05: 43 New
          +3
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          200 machines are normal, in the USA, for comparison, the 211 F-15 Strike Eagle in the Air Force + 80 in the National Guard. The total number of 291.

          Хоть вы и "Лт. запаса ВВС" но в ВВС разбираетесь слабо. No. У нас достаточно эффективно "по земле" могут работать только Су-24М, Су-34 и Су-25. Эти машины надо сравнивать не только с "Ударными Орлами", добавьте сюда около 1000 F-16 и около 400 палубных F-18. И где тут "паритет"? No.
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock 18 December 2015 22: 10 New
            0
            Quote: Bongo
            Хоть вы и "Лт. запаса ВВС" но в ВВС разбираетесь слабо. У нас достаточно эффективно "по земле" могут работать только Су-24М, Су-34 и Су-25. Эти машины надо сравнивать не только с "Ударными Орлами", добавьте сюда около 1000 F-16 и около 400 палубных F-18. И где тут "паритет"?

            They have Lantirn sighting hanging containers, which essentially any fighter can reorient into a front-line bomber. We have no such systems in our troops yet.
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 19 December 2015 08: 39 New
              +1
              Quote: Lt. air force reserve
              They have Lantirn sighting hanging containers, which essentially any fighter can reorient into a front-line bomber. We have no such systems in our troops yet.

              И я о том же, хотя не на любой конечно. Но о "паритете" речи нет! No.
  3. 79807420129
    79807420129 17 December 2015 16: 05 New
    10
    A good gift for the New Year!
    1. Akella
      Akella 17 December 2015 16: 10 New
      +5
      Quote: 79807420129
      A good gift for the New Year!

      Лучший подарок - это если мы сможем организовать поставки нашего вооружения по типу ленд-лиза "правильным" участникам анти-ИГИЛовской коалиции. И поможем, и заработаем (как это обычно делают западные "партнеры").
  4. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING 17 December 2015 16: 05 New
    +5
    Every day I would read :)
  5. Taranchello
    Taranchello 17 December 2015 16: 08 New
    +7
    Waste my DUCKS !!! soldier
  6. manguest
    manguest 17 December 2015 16: 08 New
    11
    Considering that modernization is much cheaper than building new cars, a combination of both approaches seems very appropriate in our difficult, and financially, time
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 17 December 2015 16: 09 New
    +6
    Удачно как на базе истребителя "сляпали" отличный бомбардировщик. Редко так бывает.
    1. rom8726
      rom8726 17 December 2015 17: 36 New
      +1
      I wonder if there were any tests of the Su-34 as a fighter (maneuverability, locators, equipment for air-to-air missiles)? Does anyone have infa?
      1. kapitan92
        kapitan92 18 December 2015 00: 08 New
        +5
        Su-34M. Design work is underway to modernize on-board electronics and software, other components and assemblies of the Su-34 will not undergo significant changes. The first results are expected in 2016-2017.

        Subsequently, the plant plans to receive an order to upgrade previously issued aircraft to this level.
    2. kapitan92
      kapitan92 18 December 2015 00: 24 New
      +4
      If I am not mistaken, the F 15strike needle was also made on the basis of the F 15 fighter
      Link: http://mensby.com/technology/guns/6474-f-15e-against-su-34
  8. Denis Obukhov
    Denis Obukhov 17 December 2015 16: 10 New
    +3
    Advantages of the Su-34 crew comfort, which is important in long-haul flights and its security - an armored cockpit that allows us to consider this aircraft as an alternative to the classic Su-25 attack aircraft.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 17 December 2015 16: 14 New
      +9
      Great news in the light of the current situation in the world would like it to be repeated more often.
      Our SU-34 in Syria.
      1. raketnik
        raketnik 17 December 2015 16: 24 New
        +3
        wipe with alcohol ..... oh youth .... fellow
  9. bad
    bad 17 December 2015 16: 13 New
    +8
    очень красивая машина!не "паркетная"..жаль что мало закупают их..
  10. bronik
    bronik 17 December 2015 16: 15 New
    +1
    The main thing is that they are real, not plastic souvenirs. Although I would buy such a toy for my grandson.
  11. Zomanus
    Zomanus 17 December 2015 16: 15 New
    +3
    Well, given how many planes will be written off in the near future,
    it’s most likely about the need to replenish the quantity,
    not about building. Plus, Crimea is being added to us and most likely in Syria we will be held for a long time.
    And the modern Su-24 and Syria can go into service.
  12. izya top
    izya top 17 December 2015 16: 15 New
    +4
    what a title sad so they would have written-4, and then the party request
  13. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 17 December 2015 16: 17 New
    +3
    The SU-34 should be used to the maximum extent possible in all military operations as the main generation 4 ++ bomber, its potential should be used to the maximum. And the 25th will serve us faithfully. A very good bomber in its segment.
  14. Panabebis
    Panabebis 17 December 2015 16: 47 New
    +3
    Good cars are those that are few ...
    1. rom8726
      rom8726 17 December 2015 17: 37 New
      +3
      only it's not 34. looks like the 35th
      1. Panabebis
        Panabebis 17 December 2015 17: 42 New
        0
        This is it :) And it is better, and there are less of them ... :)
        1. AlexG83
          AlexG83 17 December 2015 19: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Panaebis
          This is it :) And it is better, and there are less of them ... :)


          Quote: Panaebis
          Good cars are those that are few ...


          I don’t understand why the hell do Su-35 drag in here?
          Su-34 is a tactical bomber, and sharpened to work on the ground much better than the Su-35. In general, I recommend looking at the photo / video of the Su-34 cockpit to get it.
  15. Thompson
    Thompson 17 December 2015 16: 55 New
    +2
    Quote: Rostovchanin
    Already laid out, but it hurts a good little devil !!!

    Like a duckling! But he will bite worse than an eagle!
    1. Sultan Babai
      Sultan Babai 17 December 2015 22: 05 New
      0
      I put you a plus, I agree that you need to put a minus, only for the argument. Regarding the Su-34 in the photo or not, it’s definitely not the Su-34, since the cockpit on the Su-34 is different, the pilots are not there one after another, but are sitting side by side.
  16. NIKNN
    NIKNN 17 December 2015 17: 00 New
    +3
    Новейший штурмовик Су-25СМ3 - глубоко модернизированная версия Су-25, он оснащен системой спутниковой навигации ГЛОНАСС (GPS) с возможностью программирования конечной точки на карте с точностью до десяти метров, которая позволяет автономно действовать летчику без поддержки наземных служб даже при "нулевой" видимости, пишут РИА Новости.

    Thanks to deep modernization, the combat effectiveness of using the Su-25CM3 attack weapons has increased up to three times.
  17. Thompson
    Thompson 17 December 2015 17: 18 New
    -3
    And which downside slammed me a minus? Is the argument weak?
  18. GSVG 86-88
    GSVG 86-88 17 December 2015 17: 26 New
    +2
    на фото нос почему то не "утиный"...
  19. Thompson
    Thompson 17 December 2015 17: 55 New
    +1
    Quote: GSVG 86-88
    на фото нос почему то не "утиный"...

    And did you take into account the picture angle? If you take off from above, you are not tall either
  20. Thompson
    Thompson 17 December 2015 17: 56 New
    +1
    Quote: Thompson
    And which downside slammed me a minus? Is the argument weak?

    The diagnosis was confirmed!