Military Review

And the first word was "false"!

90
“And Abraham said of Sarah his wife: she is my sister. And Abimelech the king of Gerar sent him, and took Sarah. "
Genesis 20: 2


Actually, I do not like to rewrite articles taken from somewhere. Usually I do it differently. I select material from various articles and monographs, then I work on it. But in this case, the work will be purely journalistic. That is, in your own words to retell someone else's text, close to its content. Cause? The reason is that the text and the ideas expressed in it are very interesting and up-to-date, and are closely related to the topic that caused a lively interest in HE: who are we and where are they from? Unfortunately, this topic arose spontaneously, therefore, it started not from the beginning, but somewhere from the middle of what we call “our history". And now during the discussion of my material "... We are all from the same ship!" The voices of those who asked: what was there before, and what about Finns, Chukchi, Indians and Aborigines of Australia sounded (and rightly so!)


Here was a yg! Stone age autograph. People do not change…

In this regard, many became interested, but where did we come from: from the constellation of the Dragon or from Africa? And the analysis of haplogroups precisely indicates this continent as the homeland of mankind. But how did we "come into the world" - that is the question? How did you become naked, upright and ... talkative? And whether labor created man, if ... if human beings are by nature lazy? It is clear that the theory that explains all this should meet certain requirements, right? First, rely on the achievements of modern science. Secondly, be consistent. Thirdly, to allow verification by genetic methods and take into account the peculiarities of human psychology, by the way, has changed little over thousands of years. As you can see, Darwin's theory does not really fit this set of requirements! And most importantly: its basic statement contradicts it: “labor created man from a monkey!” What kind of work, when we work only out of necessity, and so would have been glad to do nothing at all! Yes, we work, and we work like horses, but then again, in order to later lie on the sand somewhere under palm trees and so that everything is included. There are probably exceptions, but I have never met them in 60 years!

And here I was just lucky. I read an interesting article on this topic in the journal ... Popular Mechanics, where they have long been writing not only about mechanics, as well as in Science and Technology, which is published in Ukraine and where a lot of interesting articles on history are published. And I am very glad that I can present here the presentation of this article with some additions from myself, not only as a historian, but also as a teacher in the public relations specialty - it turns out that there is a direct link between PR and the genesis of humanity.

So, in ancient times, around 3 million years ago, it was in Africa, in Southeast Africa, that a very favorable set of environmental conditions developed. The warm climate, flat terrain and many reservoirs, which were found in delicious clams. And in this area there were great apes, which, like all primates, faced one problem. Protein hunger! Modern portable video cameras in the wild have shown that chimpanzees kill birds, steal eggs from nests, and even use small sticks to kill small antelopes, so that later ... they can eat their meat. They need protein, because they have no problems with carbohydrates.


Migrations of ancient haplogroups. The numbers on the right are ages in thousands of years.

In this sense, our ancestors were very lucky. Shellfish! Get in the water, catch and eat! But ... on all fours you will not go far, and you will not catch much with your mouth. That is, the advantage in reproduction - and reproduction is the main goal of human life, like any other biological creature on earth - got those who ... faster than others got up on their hind legs! They went deeper, got more, ate more, and therefore more often multiplied and passed on their genes (and skills!) To their descendants. So over time, people became erect and lost hair in the same way. After all, if all the time soak in search of food, then not catch a cold for long. There were no hospitals then - caught a cold - got sick and ... died! His genes are not passed! But those who had not so thick wool, got wet less, got sick less and more often, and reproduced more effectively!

At the same time, they worked a little. How? Smashed the shells of caught mollusks with stones! Such primitive choppers were found in the named region, as well as the broken shells of mollusks and turtles. That is, yes, people worked, but, as now, they did it out of necessity. And for the most part lay in the shade under the bushes and ... multiplied, combining business with pleasure!

Yes, but how to persuade the female to breed in the conditions of abundance of food? It is clear how in hunger! But when there is a lot of food, you just need to go into the pond and climb a little there. My students (oh, these students!) Sometimes answer this question this way: to show her ... What is clear to show! But ... it did not work on people in this era! Everyone was "naked and happy." Of course, force coercion was not excluded. But ... it was much easier for the female to simply ... "persuade"! That is, to show her with signs and sounds that you are not averse, that she is “the woman of your dreams” and that the most important thing is that she lay in the shade under a bush, and she will lie, and here he is Ыg, Hug, Ug, Ryg, Mug - bring her delicious food! That is, the basis of most of the actions of people was lazy. It was lazy to look for food itself, well, let him bring, and I will give him! And this is how the speech was born - from the sounds with which our great-great-great-ancestors lured each other to “sparring”. At the same time, the most important thing should be noted: the very first word spoken (conditionally, of course, it must be understood!) Was ... FALSE! Because the man, of course, promised the woman more than he could actually do. He promised her many, many tasty foods, shells and snails, but ... always did less than he promised! This is the case today! That is, PR was born with people!
That's how our ancestors just became naked, upright and talkative! That is, people!

And then there was another climate change! It became dry, the ponds with clams dried out, and you had to live in the savannah and somehow survive. People here found a way out and broke into tribes. And they began to share food with each other and it was through this that they retained their kind. However, here they had a problem. In his famous novel “1984”, George Orwell wrote that since the Upper Paleolithic times people have been divided into three groups - smart, medium and stupid. And again this is indeed the way it is, and we all know it very well.

And here is the question: in the difficult conditions in which our ancestors found themselves at that time, which of these groups had the most chances for survival? Of course, the middle ones! Yes, yes, they are average "terpily", they are all ready to endure, overcome, but "to be like everyone else" is their ideal! Stupid at the time was the hardest. Violated the unwritten laws of the tribe, got a club on the head and ... you ate! Therefore, their genes are transmitted to descendants in the least. But there were problems with smart ones, often there was nothing for them, but they didn’t want to “be like everyone else.” And what did those people have to do? Banish your restless kinsmen! There were many tribes. From one expelled, from the second, from the third ... The fugitives met, stole their women, multiplied, formed their own tribe, and they had the same problems. Stupid spruce - smart expelled! This is how natural selection went, not for wool and long legs, but for intelligence! And the people (and they became more and more!) Went farther and farther, and at the same time they became smarter.

And the first word was "false"!

Distribution of ancient haplogroups.

Gradually they mastered the whole earth. They invented an ax, a spear, a harpoon, a net, a raft, a boat, a sling, a bow, and ceramics; they learned to use fire and paint caves. Food has now become a lot! The stupid have stopped killing (the stupid wife has become even a value!), The wise have become leaders and priests and ... the biological progress of humanity, alas, has stopped. The brain stopped growing and, moreover, the mental faculties also began to decline. For example, the memory began to weaken. Why strain it - after all, there is Google. With the logic it became bad - again, why strain your brains when everything is in books and on the Web, and also “you can ask Masha”. So, mentally, humanity today has been degrading and degrading for a long time, since the first cities appeared on the planet, that is, 10-7 thousands of years. But this is nothing on a common historical scale, so do not be particularly scared.

That is, in accordance with the “Pareto law”, the trend, the vector of human development has changed: if earlier there were 80% and 20% with a plus sign, then now the same indicator with a minus sign. But thanks to the development of science, technology and modern media, these same 20% can do much more than the other 80, so the total degradation of humanity is still not threatened!
Author:
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Fitter65
    Fitter65 22 December 2015 06: 24
    21
    Well, about the origin of speech, back in the 70-80s of the last century, a joke went on. The ancient people of the mammoth saved, butchered, fried, ate. They lie near the fire, brush their brushes, pick their teeth. One produces BA, the second BU, the third BU. This is how the ancients spoke. laughing
    1. Mangel olys
      Mangel olys 22 December 2015 06: 45
      +6
      I put "+". Laughed heartily! good
      1. kalibr
        22 December 2015 08: 54
        +2
        I am glad! Laughter prolongs life. One would only find out how much this all corresponds to the truth, right? However, as was already written about in the article, this theory explains a lot and does not contradict the data of modern science. And common sense!
        1. Riv
          Riv 22 December 2015 09: 39
          +7
          Yes, all this tales. Three million years - despite the fact that even over the past 500 years, people have changed very much. In such a period, you can shove anything. Evolution, degradation, nuclear wars, drunken hedgehogs - and still a place will remain. The history of modern civilization is only 10.000 years old. Less than nothing. Flap the wings of a butterfly. After another 10.000 years, there will be a forest on the site of Chernobyl and it will be possible to find the place of the accident only by chance. And if they find it, they will wonder how an alloy of uranium oxide, silica and zirconium could form in nature. And they will explain it with natural reasons. :)

          Therefore, any theory can be put forward. There is not much sense from them, but there is no harm.
          1. BMP-2
            BMP-2 22 December 2015 23: 34
            +3
            Quote: Riv
            There is not much sense from them, but there is no harm.


            But how can I say, in Ukraine, these are the stories that form the complex of national exclusivity. what

            By the way, as a PR specialist, the author probably knows that the consumer society is a product of recent history, which was artificially formed and gradually introduced into consciousness since the beginning of the 60s of the twentieth century. In this regard, a question to the author: this "retelling of someone else's article" is generally advertising and promotion of what? (indicate the correct option) wink
            a) laziness;
            b) degradation;
            c) haloperidol.
            The option "advertising the theory of gallogroups" should not be offered, since it is used only as an informational occasion.
        2. fennekRUS
          fennekRUS 22 December 2015 23: 21
          +1
          Quote: kalibr
          Just to find out how much this all corresponds to the truth, right?

          Velma's article is funny, plus set. But the author gracefully skirted the "inconvenient" factors smile For example, no one tried to eat "carefree" monkeys? Protein, and other animals need it. ))
          1. Aljavad
            Aljavad 24 December 2015 02: 15
            0
            For example, no one tried to eat "carefree" monkeys? Protein, and other animals need it. ))


            Chimpanzees know how to kill leopards.
      2. Heritologist
        Heritologist 22 December 2015 17: 47
        0
        Quote: Mangel Olys
        I put "+". Laughed heartily!

        I put "-". Not funny. The theory is far-fetched.
    2. Petrol
      Petrol 22 December 2015 14: 13
      -3
      if we consider that the mummy of the Pharaoh "Tutankhamun" was found in the tomb of an ordinary Etruscan average infantryman, then in 100 years it will probably be written in the books "BA, BU, BY"
  2. c3r
    c3r 22 December 2015 06: 45
    +8
    Yes, degradation in person! An article of a typical city dweller, beautiful life in the bosom of nature with eating shellfish and fuck..em women. Just class! The author apparently forgot that hunters walked 20 kilometers in order to get food, or and more, and women had the duty to keep the hearth and to collect all kinds of roots, berries, mushrooms. You don’t really care, you will work so that there will be offspring and respect to feed the offspring, and if you don’t, then no PR will help, which you killed or picking up something and eat. Moreover, just like that to break a woman, and more rape (this was also considered a crime) would not work, there would always be wedding rituals, or even prairie ... just like dogs! A PR man in the tribe was the same shaman, and for their worthless PR they could bang women in their In most cases there wasn’t. Try to live richly in the village and do nothing. Either rich or nothing. You need to plow, and talkers sorry publicists thump. Progress plus electrification of the whole country produce a bunch of parasites and talkers who need theories like this, so that justify your parasitic living on a healthy body of society!
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 08: 01
      +6
      What kind of hunt are we talking about? It started with climate change. That you forgot what you read a minute ago ... 20 km this is significantly after.
    2. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 10: 47
      +2
      Quote: c3r
      The author apparently forgot

      It is you who apparently confuse life in the primitive world and life on the Hutsul collective farm - they may be similar in appearance but they are different hi
  3. Silhouette
    Silhouette 22 December 2015 07: 17
    +4
    flat humor.
  4. parusnik
    parusnik 22 December 2015 07: 26
    +4
    so that universal degradation does not threaten humanity!... Who knows ... how it will be ... For some reason, humanity is perfecting the weapons of its own kind, and not joining forces to solve human problems in the field of ecology, the development of the ocean, space ... it does not turn the desert into blooming gardens, but does the opposite ..
  5. inkass_98
    inkass_98 22 December 2015 07: 31
    +3
    "What did the designer smoke?" (FROM)
    I’m even afraid to suggest the sphere of teaching of Mr. Shpakovsky. This is what a university of such a valuable specialist warmed up?
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 07: 56
      +3
      And not just valuable, but very valuable! And which university can you see on the network, or you do not know how? And in the E-lab there are scientific works and a citation index and RSCI and HIRSH.
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 22 December 2015 09: 01
        +2
        To be honest, I don’t really want to watch, I have enough of my worries. I am happy for the university and its teaching staff, and especially for students - in particular. hi
  6. Sirocco
    Sirocco 22 December 2015 07: 49
    +7
    From the egg and chicken series, who appeared first? So in all history, we don’t know the truth when, and as it was thousands of years ago, no one knows, only VERSIONS and no more, since we did not live then and until we find ourselves in that style, nothing find out. The whole story is a TIRE invented in someone's interests, in the interests of the ruling elite.
    Now on the topic.
    Man is a social being, that is, not one or two individuals will not survive and will not learn anything, since there is no one to adopt the experience from, with the accidental origin of mankind, and an example of this is the people of "Mowgli", We will moo, scratch and stink like a wild beast ... So, the question is open who and where brought the first batch, and who taught us everything?
  7. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 22 December 2015 08: 44
    +8
    And as an option: "In your own image and likeness"?
    Or the universal mind?
  8. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 22 December 2015 09: 03
    +1
    Thank you, Vyacheslav, for the excellent article! I love this topic very much.
    As for when our ancestors' wool disappeared. The Pithecanthropus, and especially the Australopithecus, didn’t have bags (from hides or other materials) for carrying babies. They hadn’t come up with it yet. So, they always dragged babies in their arms ? I heard that in modern newborns of the form Homo sapiens, in maternity hospitals, their toes are SEPARATED SEPARATELY FROM ANOTHER !!! I would try an adult to do this! Damn two! So, there were things to hold on to Pithecanthropic babies! Therefore, I believe that of all hominids only Homo sapiens didn’t (and don’t) have hair. But Neanderthals, the race which arose in Europe, in the subglacial, had to have wool in order to survive.
    And about the degradation, and not of Humanity, but of the entire Earth biosphere, I can say that it began not in the modern era, but on the border of the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.
    Sources:
    Y. Jelinek. Large Illustrated Atlas of the Primeval Man. Artia.
    A. Gangnus. Technopark of the Jurassic Period: The Riddles of Evolution. "Veche". Moscow. 2006.
    1. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 10: 45
      +1
      Quote: Reptiloid
      I heard that in modern newborns of the species Homo sapiens, in maternity hospitals, the toes are SEPARATED SEPARATELY FROM EACH OTHER !!!

      And human embryos have gills and a tail hi
  9. Oprychnik
    Oprychnik 22 December 2015 09: 12
    +6
    Yes, you, my friend, a Darwinist! No sublime flight of thought, solid physiology.)))
  10. Archikah
    Archikah 22 December 2015 09: 19
    +3
    Here the respected author left no "bookmarks" to which many did not pay attention. Well, first of all, Darwin's theory, annoying and long thrown into a landfill, is being circulated again. Again the same ridiculous and pseudoscientific theory about our origin from Africa is repeated. This speaks of our common, supposedly ancestor with blacks. This is true only as far as the nation of Mr. Shpakovsky is concerned. Yes, Jews do not consider themselves to be white. Everyone knows this too. But why unfounded, then all of us there to drag. Rejoice gentlemen Shpakovsky - you are Semites. Closer to Archantropus.
    Now haplogroups. The author is not stupid enough. He, under the guise of humor, gives corrupting information. So it is easier to perceive, including the subconscious. Indeed, there are studies on haplogroups. You can also trace who comes from and understand what kind of ancestors we had. So, neither of which was indicated by the author corresponds to the latest research in this area. And we already realized that the author is not stupid. So this is not his mistake, but a deliberate neglected lie. Lies for the sake of creating false images for the reader. Bookmark Moreover, the author let slip that he is a specialist in PR. And there they pay a lot of attention to psychology and suggestive practices.
    A person writing such articles is a specific enemy. I am not inclined to exaggerate. If he did it by ignorance or stupidity. That is also not an excuse. But I repeat. He is recommended to us as the author of many monographs. The citation index is given. So - as they say he who knows how to hear, hears.
    And who are we and where are we from. We are a white race. This remarkably gives Sidorov G.V. Look who is really interested. Academician Chudinov V.A. Especially we are Russian. Slavs. hi
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 10: 25
      +4
      Quote: Archikah
      the author let slip

      Haha, such authors do not "slip out". In addition, you did not read the article carefully (and why do so many VO readers read it inattentively?) This is not my article! And the material copied from the magazine Popular Mechanics and there is written about the author.
    2. kalibr
      22 December 2015 10: 29
      +3
      Chudinov’s works, claiming to be discoveries in the field of epigraphy and paleography, are not recognized by academic science, and historians and linguists rank his concept as a folk history. The conclusions of Chudinov’s concept are not based on scientific methods of working with sources, and his works on history and linguistics have not been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals!
      1. Boris55
        Boris55 22 December 2015 11: 01
        +3
        Quote: kalibr
        Chudinov's works ... are not recognized by academic science

        Who pays - the young lady dances
        Representatives of academic science are fully supported by those in power, otherwise we would have long ago abandoned hydrocarbons. The main task of academics is to serve slave owners and create illusions of their "happy life" for slaves.
        1. kalibr
          22 December 2015 13: 27
          +1
          This is very suitable for Chudinov, isn't it? "You are great, you are powerful, work your bros ..."
        2. Glot
          Glot 22 December 2015 14: 18
          +2
          Representatives of academic science are completely on the content of those in power, otherwise we would have long abandoned hydrocarbons.


          Representatives of academic science, primarily professionals in their field, people who have spent years and decades trying to become them.
          And any sane person, in any business or situation, will trust the pros and not anyhow anyone.
          Sane if of course. smile

          The main task of academics is to serve slave owners and create illusions of their "happy life" for slaves.


          Yah ?
          Slaveholders are served by these same slaves. For this they exist.
          And illusions ... People often create them for themselves. Who is missing. smile
          Or do you think Academician Chelomey created a "nuclear shield" for "illusions of a happy life, like Yangel in avionics?"
          Ehh ... "expert in academic science" You are our ... laughing
          1. Boris55
            Boris55 22 December 2015 16: 45
            +1
            Quote: Glot
            Or, in your opinion, Academician Chelomey created a "nuclear shield" for "illusions of a happy life,

            Respected! You confuse the exact sciences with fiction. hi
            1. Glot
              Glot 22 December 2015 18: 55
              +1
              Respected! You confuse the exact sciences with fiction.


              Do you understand the meaning of the term?
              If so, what does academic work, academics and fiction have to do with it?
              Or do you know the names of academic fiction writers? smile
              Rather, you confuse scientific works and scientists with fiction, frivolous literature and people writing it. request
              1. Aljavad
                Aljavad 24 December 2015 02: 33
                +1
                names of fiction academics


                Obruchev. But this is a long time ago. Then the academicians had more free time ...

                But even he did not mix "scientific works with fiction, frivolous literature".
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Aljavad
          Aljavad 24 December 2015 02: 29
          +2
          Who pays - the young lady dances


          Quote should be close to the text!

          In the original - like this: "Whoever eats a young lady, then dances her."

          That's all the "alternatives" are guilty of this. Something, somewhere, someone blurted out, another "quoted", a third artistically processed ... And a new duck went for a walk on the net. Even if at the beginning there was something really unique, they talked so that they were reluctant to get to the bottom of the truth.
      2. Oprichnik
        Oprichnik 22 December 2015 11: 47
        +1
        All your so-called Academic science is sewn with white thread. She even tied the entire history of modern civilized, so to speak, society to the dating of ancient Egypt. Which is also written on the erroneous conclusions of radiocarbon dating. What can we say about periods of millions of years.
        This is not a fallacy of academic science, but a deliberate distortion of both facts and artifacts by ridiculing, threatening, hushing up, destroying the uncomfortable and uncomfortable. And I advise Sidorov G., V.A. Chudinov, Sundakov, Sergey Danilov to read and listen.
        1. kalibr
          22 December 2015 13: 28
          0
          And who are you to advise? Also an academician, huh? In addition, the material in question was not about carbon analysis, but about haplogroups — a much more accurate thing.
    3. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 10: 44
      0
      Quote: Archikah
      I am not inclined to exaggerate.

      I do not know what else you are inclined to - but that you are inclined to write "incomprehensible things" I already understood fellow
    4. BMP-2
      BMP-2 23 December 2015 00: 05
      +2
      You are right, the author is not stupid enough and will not lie just like that. yes Lying always has a goal, and one can assume that in this case it is not a search for a unifying idea, but just the opposite: the creation of grounds for "pluralism." Well, and the fact that pluralism is an excellent basis for manipulation, I hope there is no need to explain to anyone?
  11. RomanS
    RomanS 22 December 2015 09: 22
    +8
    The laurels of Darwin do not allow the author to sleep peacefully. The article put a minus. Having a personal opinion is great, but putting it out to the masses as a postulate is strange. Not a single scientific evidence, not a single link, the entire text is personal insinuations based on unproven assumptions.
  12. bober1982
    bober1982 22 December 2015 09: 42
    +3
    The article is rather ridiculous, to put it mildly, from beginning to end. Humanitarian education in its current form (universities, teaching, teachers and students) is in a miserable state.
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 11: 01
      +1
      "Do not judge rashly, says the Gospel and Mr. Cardinal!"
  13. Dimachrus
    Dimachrus 22 December 2015 09: 43
    +5
    A cheerful professor however. And most importantly, he has not lost his craving for self-development, he reads "popular mechanics" regularly.
    And his theory is brilliantly logical if not for some questions ...
    The first question is - how many traces of transitional forms of these mollusk fishers were found in Africa? There are primitive choppers, but there are traces of half-woolen and half-erect where? It seems like not a couple of years seduced by lazy females in the process of evolution in the cradle of mankind?
    The second question - according to the reinforced concrete logic "laziness is the engine of progress", the distribution map of haplogroups is somehow strange. Why have lazy clam fishermen rushed north to colder habitats?
    There are many such questions, I won’t list everything, but I would like to clarify one more point - according to the theory of hair loss (although a person, unlike animals and animals, does not have hair and hair), how long does it take to wait for the formation of abundant natural insulation in the peoples living in the far north ?
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 10: 26
      +2
      Quote: Dimachrus
      Why did the lazy mollusk fishers rush north to colder habitats?

      Have you looked at the map? Where else could they go?
    2. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 10: 42
      +2
      Quote: Dimachrus
      but how many traces of transitional forms of these mollusk fishers were found in Africa?

      It seems not found at all, but this theory explains why they were not found laughing
      And yet, there is only an insignificant part of the total number of living organisms - if figuratively and not accurately but intelligibly - then there were billions or more dinosaurs, but they are found in the amount of a couple of pieces.
      And if the first people were just a couple of pieces, how many of them will find a couple? They will be found zero pieces request
      Quote: Dimachrus
      Why did the lazy mollusk fishers rush north to colder habitats?

      The author answered about this in the article, the habitat of mankind is in direct proportion to their number on the basis (for clarity) "1 person per 1 kilometer" - and do not forget about climate change.
      Quote: Dimachrus
      according to the theory of wool loss

      According to the theory of the "water man", a person lost his wool in order to swim and cool better - and then he simply no longer needed it, and even the "northern people" - they wear skins.
      1. BMP-2
        BMP-2 23 December 2015 00: 19
        +2
        Quote: Down House
        And if the first people were just a couple of pieces


        C'mon, is this with an abundance of food supply and unlimited possibilities for reproduction? belay

        Once, in modern times, enterprising people brought rabbits to Australia. Very soon they bred so much that it almost became an environmental disaster.

        By the way, the presence of predators capable of regulating the population of primitive people does not allow us to accept the idea that with an abundance of food, expulsion from the herd would allow the individual to survive. Moreover, language as a means of communication appeared relatively recently - 500 years ago. And this means that the exiled could not agree with the same renegades before he could form a new community. laughing
    3. BMP-2
      BMP-2 23 December 2015 00: 11
      +3
      Quote: Dimachrus
      how long is it left to wait for the formation of abundant natural insulation among the peoples living in the extreme north?


      And I look forward to when the polar bears lose their wool! laughing On their hind legs, they already learned to walk ...
  14. Oprychnik
    Oprychnik 22 December 2015 09: 51
    +1
    This, of course, is talk. But yesterday, one of the most knowledgeable people in the world, Pope Francis announced literally the following on Peter's Square:
    "This Christmas may be the last for humanity ..."
    Although we have been regularly prepared for something bad lately, our brains are beginning to boil ...
  15. zoknyay82
    zoknyay82 22 December 2015 09: 53
    +1
    Does the author think he came from a monkey? Originally!
    1. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 10: 34
      +2
      Quote: zoknyay82
      Does the author think he came from a monkey?

      The author knows what came from mom and dad, and what happened "millions of years ago" knows the theory of evolution.
      Quote: zoknyay82
      Originally!

      In the 21st century, to believe that a person was blinded by their saliva and clay in 6 days? Yes - CRIATIVNINK0! fellow
  16. Limon1972
    Limon1972 22 December 2015 09: 55
    +1
    All this is strange ... Somehow it’s not logical, why climb to Taimyr from Africa and Western Asia? request
    1. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 10: 32
      +2
      Quote: Limon1972
      Somehow it’s not logical, why climb to Taimyr from Africa and Western Asia

      In this world, in general, there is a lot that is accidental and not logical - but there is a logical explanation for this - climate change and simply flight from "violent neighbors".
    2. Aljavad
      Aljavad 24 December 2015 02: 41
      0
      All this is strange ... Somehow it’s not logical, why climb to Taimyr from Africa and Western Asia?


      Nobody ever climbed on Taimyr ... (except for "people from Hyperborea"). all normal people were driven there either by evil brothers or no less evil circumstances.

      And on the island of Fiery Land - too.
  17. Down House
    Down House 22 December 2015 10: 31
    +3
    Brilliant article, usually when I talk about the "water man" for some reason everyone is surprised - no one knows about him request
    But one thing I did not understand
    As you can see, Darwin’s theory doesn’t fit this set of requirements! And most importantly: it contradicts his main statement: “labor created man from a monkey!”

    This is probably a joke, because Engels said it, and he has nothing to do with the theory of evolution.
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 10: 56
      +5
      You know, you are absolutely right, but the funny thing is that you noticed this. Bravo!
      1. Down House
        Down House 22 December 2015 12: 32
        0
        Quote: kalibr
        but the funny thing is that you noticed it.

        I'm just used to the fact that there are a limited number of "myths" about TE (as well as about many other theories) and they are repeated hi
    2. bober1982
      bober1982 22 December 2015 11: 14
      0
      Marxists were delighted with Darwin's theory, so what jokes are there.
      1. Down House
        Down House 22 December 2015 12: 36
        +3
        Quote: bober1982
        Marxists were enthusiastic about Darwin's theory

        And how the capitalists were delighted with this theory - already the theory of "social Darwinism" was blinded by "racial superiority", which later "Uncle Adik" adopted after the British, but already in Germany fellow
        So, whatever one may say, and scientific theories are scientific for that, that they then begin to be included in the "scientific pictures of the world" that the right, that the left hi
    3. Aljavad
      Aljavad 24 December 2015 02: 47
      +1
      "Labor created man from a monkey!"


      The labor teacher in my elementary school in the first lesson said:

      - My subject is the most important! Because labor created from man ... Whom?
      - To the monkey! - the class has struck. fellow laughing wink

      And who does not believe in evolution - let him explain why the dogs are so different.
      1. brn521
        brn521 24 December 2015 12: 36
        +1
        Quote: Aljavad
        And who does not believe in evolution

        The problem is not evolution, but the mechanisms that supposedly underlie it. Take, for example, hereditary-transmitted behavior. An example offhand. What kind of mutation caused a frog in the rainforest to lay a fertilized egg on its back, climb a tree, look for a special flower that can hold rain water for a long time, drop eggs there, and then lay another one unfertilized so that the tadpole has something to eat?
        The current concept takes too much literally out of thin air. It is necessary to supplement with something objective. Moreover, having sufficient information capacity and faster information performance than that life and the range of conditions of its existence that we are observing at the moment.
        Quote: Aljavad
        And who does not believe in evolution - let him explain why the dogs are so different.

        These are breeds that are unable to go beyond certain boundaries. Besides, why cite artificially created breeds as an example? We are not talking about creation.
  18. Boris55
    Boris55 22 December 2015 10: 36
    +1
    ... So, in ancient times, about 3 million years ago, it was in Africa, in Southeast Africa, that a very favorable set of natural conditions developed ...

    The biblical concept of the creation of God's chosen ones - rules.
    There are enough artifacts that we are not the first civilization on this planet today. It is no longer possible to hide them, and therefore the arguments that humanity originated there are untenable, if only for the reason that before global catastrophes, one of which is the flood described in the Bible, the climate was somewhat different, and the continents looked somewhat different ... After the so-called "Global Flood" not all and not everywhere people died ...
    The mystery of the death of Atlantis: http://79.120.77.163/klin/page.php?id=377
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 11: 00
      +1
      And the results of genetic studies on haplogroups are also impossible to hide. They are on the map in the article! Although yes, there are people (and many!) Who are shaved, and they are shaved in response! Well, it's hard to deal with haplogroups, what can I do! Atlantis, it is much simpler and more understandable.
      1. Boris55
        Boris55 22 December 2015 12: 52
        +1
        Quote: kalibr
        Although yes, there are people (and many!) Who are shaved, and they are shaved in response!

        "... With any way of understanding the world, the concepts of the historical past, generated by historical science, are always certain selections of events from the actual history in its completeness and detail, which are accompanied by a number of errors and deliberate falsification, both in the aspect of the reliability of the facts themselves, involved in substantiation the corresponding concept of the historical past, and in the aspect of establishing their causal relationships ... "More: http://79.120.77.163/klin/page.php?id=456
      2. Glot
        Glot 22 December 2015 14: 04
        +4
        Atlantis, it is much simpler and more understandable.


        It's right. The main thing is to pronounce with a slight breath in your voice ... Atlantis-ah ... And other "aliens from the stars." What haplogroups are there ... laughing
        There yob ***** Aguzarova in one of the interviews at all assured that she supposedly came here to Earth from Mars. laughing
        About how widely people look, and here ... Africa, monkeys and haplogroups. Well, the right word is boring ...
        EVERYTHING ON MARS !!! laughing laughing laughing
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 22 December 2015 17: 00
          +1
          Quote: Glot
          It's right. The main thing is to pronounce with a gasp in the voice ... Atlantis ...

          Don't you believe in the coexistence of antediluvian civilization? And who, then, did the universal wave, referred to in the Bible as the "flood", wash away?

          When I was little, I believed that life on earth began from the moment I was born and if it rains, then it goes everywhere, but since then I have grown considerably and no longer believe in fairy tales, no matter how convincing they are.

          History is not a science. History is a servant of those in power. See to Ukraine, it is not original in its actions to distort history. Any new government rewrites history for itself.
          1. Glot
            Glot 22 December 2015 19: 04
            +1
            Don't you believe in the coexistence of antediluvian civilization? And who, then, did the universal wave, referred to in the Bible as the "flood", wash away?


            A matter of faith is a religious activity.
            Science is based on facts, not faith.
            This is a note.

            When I was little, I believed that life on earth began from the moment I was born and if it rains, then it goes everywhere, but since then I have grown considerably and no longer believe in fairy tales, no matter how convincing they are.


            Judging by what you wrote, everything remained for you as in childhood.

            History is not a science. History is a servant of those in power. See to Ukraine, it is not original in its actions to distort history. Any new government rewrites history for itself.


            Yah ? Isn't history a science?
            It seems so to you, since you understand little in it.
            Regarding the situation in Ukraine. Yes, they rewrite what? Yes, nothing but laughter doesn’t cause anything else for everyone. So this example is not good. Only a fool can conceive of this.
            However, the brainless enough. And in Ukraine, and here and in the whole world as a whole.
            For them, they write about the "dug up seas" and "women of reptilian section". laughing
            And they take it all on faith.
            Smart people, it's just funny and nothing more.
            1. kalibr
              22 December 2015 22: 33
              0
              It's ridiculous - that's why I believe! - said Thomas Aquinas
      3. The comment was deleted.
  19. Divandek
    Divandek 22 December 2015 11: 27
    +2
    Rehash of Darwinism. And here in that region ... The Masonic theory about the origin of man in Africa, and therefore humanity is one, and therefore white, yellow and black, mate, mate and mumble ... Until you become monkeys in that same region.
  20. Oprychnik
    Oprychnik 22 December 2015 12: 00
    +5
    Good postulate. Laziness is the main driving force of development and technological progress. Nothing contradictory. All inventions, from the wheel to the computer
    called upon to amuse human laziness. I know from myself that I want to do any work faster. And for what? And then to do nothing!)))
    1. a housewife
      a housewife 23 December 2015 02: 34
      +2
      Not certainly in that way. Not every job you want to finish quickly. And it’s absolutely stupid to do nothing! I would like to finish the work necessary, but unloved. I have to do all the household chores to do what I like. This is also called a hobby. There are some happy people who have the same job and hobby. Writers, for example, artists. Or a cook. Or tailors. All the same, if only it was a favorite job. "A good shoemaker is a poet! -A bad one? -Shoemaker!"
      1. Oprychnik
        Oprychnik 23 December 2015 12: 09
        0
        "And it’s absolutely stupid to do nothing!"

        It is for this reason that most men prefer not to have the smartest women in wives (housewives), although this is not a guarantee. For a man, he’ll always find something to do if he doesn’t lie on the couch.))) That is, if you follow your logic, it’s not labor and laziness that is the engine of progress, but a simple and worthy housewife!)))
  21. brn521
    brn521 22 December 2015 12: 16
    0
    As far as I remember, the same genetics seems like hefty cookies to similar constructions. The genome of a species is a powerful center, near which this species is forced to dance, giving out perhaps separate breeds. This is one of the foundations of life on Earth. Serious mutations lead to non-viability or inability to reproduce, less serious gradually corrected. Those. if the mutated individual is viable and continues to multiply, then the changes that occur are overwritten literally in a couple of generations. The same division of the sexes is one of the mechanisms that contribute to maintaining the integrity of the species. As a result, frogs will not be able to turn into lizards in any way, and monkeys into humans. The assumption of the opposite is the remnants of the views of the time when science was at the level of the plinth, and it seemed to all kinds of breeders that if you suffer for a long time with selection and crossbreeding, then you can grow apples on a pine tree and teach fish to fly and make nests. But then science pulled itself together, all sorts of microscopes, a device. Scientific material has been accumulated and systematized. And that’s it, bummer.
    In general, in my opinion at the moment, the theory of evolution, which is taught with might and main in schools and advertised on a planetary scale, is religious and philosophical, not scientific. Just the theory of creation was replaced by the theory of magical properties inherent in matter - spontaneous spontaneous generation and self-development.
    Perhaps even this has been done and is advancing on purpose :). They closed a certain direction in cognition with an artificial barrier - like, but it all happens here suddenly and spontaneously. But suddenly, driving in the resources of science and humanity in that direction, would we be close to becoming a creator? Or at least control life expectancy, death, etc.?
    Well, the article again. Fantasy-mythological themes in the article seem to inspire to continue similarly. Take at least the Jewish-Christian epic. There is a creator. There is still someone who has taken a piece from the creator (and people, by the way, too) and is trying, relying on him, to create his own control and management system, after which to grab everything else, and to put the creator to hell. Well and of course, both sides view people as material. Like someone with a creator, he will be forced to exist in his system and live according to his will, otherwise he will remain on his own. And who is not with the creator, he will be intercepted and enslaved by his rival, the Prince of this world. So mankind cannot solve a lot of very important issues for him, it just spins in place, digging in the wrong direction and getting several new problems instead of one resolved issue.
    1. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 12: 30
      +1
      He glanced briefly and stumbled.
      Quote: brn521
      The same division of the sexes is one of the mechanisms that contribute to maintaining the integrity of the species.

      Everything is exactly the opposite!
      In short: the mother's "genes" are stable, but there is no father - you yourself look around: almost all women are similar, they have a very similar level of intelligence with small variations, among them (if we compare statistics with men) there are almost no geniuses and heroes, but there are no serial maniacs, mentally retarded, alcoholics, etc.
      Quote: brn521
      In general, in my opinion at the moment, the theory of evolution, which is taught with might and main in schools and advertised on a planetary scale, is religious and philosophical, not scientific.

      I didn’t read further - sorry hi
  22. Minotavrik
    Minotavrik 22 December 2015 13: 03
    +8
    I’m wondering how a respected author will explain facts that contradict the theory of human evolution:

    1. The number of chromosome pairs in humans - 23, humanoid (higher) monkeys - 24 (a total of 46 chromosomes in humans, in a monkey 48 pieces). What kind of shellfish did they eat? Or was it the "smart" monkeys who "accidentally" - within the framework of natural selection, took another pair of chromosomes for themselves?

    2. The human brain of the modern "Homo erectus" (with intelligence as it gets worse and worse) in performance puts the computing power of computers on the blades of the entire planet. Recently, the performance of 1 (one) percent of the human brain was simulated (One percent of the brain is 1,73 billion nerve cells and 10,4 trillion synapses connecting them). To conduct the experiment, the scientists used 82 processors from the K supercomputer and 944 petabyte of memory (1 bytes per synapse). An average human individual uses this miracle unit by 24 - 2%.

    Attention question? On the basis of what evolutionary processes was such power laid? What for? How was it developed?

    3. The structure of the larynx and jaw. The paradox is that not a single land mammal on the planet has such a jaw structure and connection with the larynx, because from a security point of view this is simply stupid. You can accidentally suffocate when you eat or drink. Again, the dense arrangement of teeth on the jaw leads to the fact that any infection on the gums leads to the death of the individual. Stupidly all the teeth fall out.
    Again, to eat, we need to chew on average 15 - 25 times. It is long and dangerous. It’s easier to tear and swallow a piece of food (which is what animals generally do) than to sit and chew. From an evolutionary point of view, this is very difficult to explain.

    There are a lot of such questions ... the truth is not heard from orthodox science ...
    All theories on the origin of man start for some reason from Cro-Magnon .. who the hell understand where it hatched ....
    1. Down House
      Down House 22 December 2015 13: 34
      +4
      Quote: Minotavrik
      What kind of shellfish did they eat? Or was it the "smart" monkeys who "accidentally" - within the framework of natural selection, took another pair of chromosomes for themselves?

      Precisely that "accidentally" - a person does not have fewer chromosomes because he ate mollusks, but he began to eat mollusks because he "accidentally" has fewer chromosomes.
      If you don't believe me, look at the "downs" - the clearest example of evolution! But in a specific case, and now it is its dead-end branch. And if they lived in the "Stone Age" they would have been expelled and they united into their "tribes" and now we would probably read about extinct "competitors" like the Neanderthals, but maybe everything would have been the other way around, they are very COLLECTIVE!
      Quote: Minotavrik
      On the basis of what evolutionary processes was such power laid?

      This "power" is not exactly known, the brain is de facto not completely studied and there are more questions than answers, and there are even more pseudo studies - but the most adequate "theory" tells us that our brain works almost 100%, just the bulk of its work it is the maintenance of the "life support" of the human body - do you understand? Well, it is so arranged that 95% of its volume is "breathing-walking" and only a couple of percent is "thinking" fellow
      Quote: Minotavrik
      It’s easier to tear and swallow a piece of food (which is what animals generally do) than to sit and chew. From an evolutionary point of view, this is very difficult to explain.

      Would you rather than remember the cow in the jungle of anatomy laughing
      In general, they will confirm to you that the human pelvis will explain EVERYTHING, well, or almost everything laughing
      In short, the structure of the organs of birth is like that of four-footed animals - they "did not have time" to rebuild, so we suffer fellow
    2. kalibr
      22 December 2015 13: 34
      +3
      What about food and genes? I was eating a pig, but my tail never grew. And the scales from the fish did not cover me ... And where did the Cro-Magnons, were they later than the described time? You have some strange questions ...
    3. Pre-cat
      Pre-cat 22 December 2015 13: 47
      +3
      Chewing is simple. Animals are "sharpened" for a certain type of food. Meat or plant foods. The jaws and larynx with the digestive tract and stomach are accordingly specialized. And humans are omnivores. Accordingly, our jaws are multifunctional. And the esophagus with the stomach too. there is no such nasty thing that a person could not eat and assimilate. except for frank rotten stuff with cadaveric poison of course. On survival in the army, what they ate and nothing. Even grass and leaves are absorbed after a period of adaptation. True, there is little calorie content and the stomach is very protesting. laughing
      1. Minotavrik
        Minotavrik 23 December 2015 14: 19
        0
        Not convinced. Take the clubfoot bear ... it is omnivorous, but the jaw is like a predator ...
      2. Minotavrik
        Minotavrik 23 December 2015 14: 19
        0
        Not convinced. Take the clubfoot bear ... it is omnivorous, but the jaw is like a predator ...
        1. Aljavad
          Aljavad 24 December 2015 03: 11
          +1
          Minotavrik RU Yesterday, 14:19 PM ↑ New
          Not convinced. Take the clubfoot bear ... it is omnivorous, but the jaw is like a predator ...


          Almost all are omnivores. Wolves love watermelons, and the Reindeer will not miss a lemming or a bird's nest.

          It's about basic food. And the bear - more than 50% - is a meat eater.
      3. Aljavad
        Aljavad 24 December 2015 03: 08
        +1
        there is no such muck that a person could not eat and assimilate.


        People say: "A man is not a pig. He will eat everything." And the people are wise.
    4. a housewife
      a housewife 23 December 2015 02: 40
      0
      With chromosomes generally fun. Not so long ago I learned that only humans and earthworms have the same number of chromosomes. So if you look, people came from the worm! wassat
      1. Aljavad
        Aljavad 24 December 2015 03: 13
        0
        So if you look, people came from the worm!


        Yes. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh very long. Like all other animals.
    5. Aljavad
      Aljavad 24 December 2015 03: 06
      0
      All theories on the origin of man start for some reason from Cro-Magnon .. who the hell understand where it hatched ....

      Cro-Magnon man is a conditional name of the primitive inhabitants of Europe. MODERN APPEARANCE! They do not start, but finish.
      And they "start" - with erectus. (this is a "straightened person", not "modern man" Homo erectus "... how you write. Modern man is called "Homo sapiens".

      In short - vinigret in your head. Reread books.
  23. Pre-cat
    Pre-cat 22 December 2015 13: 36
    +7
    Great article. Cheered up. Everything is correct, laziness and a keen desire to multiply are the engine of progress. If you don’t want to chase an antelope, think of a spear and a bow. I didn’t want to drag prey on myself - I came up with a drag and wheel. Wanted a woman - bring her furs or come up with alcohol to become supple. And then, when it became enough for everyone to booty and began to punish enemies for necklaces made from fangs and ears, clever men came up with money - the equivalent of booty. And off we go. Who has a steeper carriage and a car is longer - that one has females with longer legs and a minimum of the brain. Also a continuation of natural selection. smile
  24. Pomeranian
    Pomeranian 22 December 2015 14: 00
    0
    Regarding the origin of speech, I can recommend to those interested the book by Didenko "Ethical Anthropology. The book is also remarkable in that it explains many things happening in the world.
  25. Kombrig
    Kombrig 22 December 2015 19: 01
    +5
    A child of a friend of mine. to the question "How did the person appear?" told about the following:
    At first, two monkeys lived in Paradise, all in all there were a lot of fruits and vegetables, and God forbade them to eat apples, the monkeys did not obey, and ate apples. Then God drove them out of Paradise, and where they ended up it was cold and there was not enough food to get the fruit, the monkeys had to stand on their hind legs and knock them down with sticks - so gradually the monkey turned into a man ... yes That - yes-ah ..... Where does the child get such knowledge? It's simple: at the lessons of history he is taught theories of evolution, and at the lessons of Orthodoxy theories of divine creation ..... And so the child’s brain, so as not to boil, comes up with a certain logical chain of both theories. Why did I tell you this? Yes, I just liked the theory ..))))))
  26. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 22 December 2015 19: 03
    +4
    "The brain stopped growing and, moreover, mental abilities also began to decrease" ////

    Not...
    Brain weight decreased due to a decrease in the protective layer that absorbed physical
    blows to the head. Before, when to get on the cumpol with a club, a sword, etc. was - a common thing
    the thickness of this layer was important. Not today. And the "power" of the working part of the brain - the "bag" of neurons
    on the contrary, it increased due to the fact that the neurons themselves became smaller (exactly how decreases with
    each generation the size of transistors in a microprocessor), and their number increased.
    1. bober1982
      bober1982 22 December 2015 19: 50
      0
      translate what you meant
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 23 December 2015 16: 11
        +3
        translate:

        The brain is surrounded, as it were, by the fatty membrane. Shock absorber
        between the cranium and the "working" sections, where the neurons.
        The shell has a fair weight. It was she who thinned as a result of evolution.
        And the working part - neurons ("transistors") and connections, have decreased in size,
        but increased in number. The brain has become lighter, but more powerful.
    2. a housewife
      a housewife 23 December 2015 02: 45
      +1
      Ah, that's what, therefore, dinosaurs had brains with nuts. There was simply nobody to give them on the head. And then, as a man appeared, he shocked with a club, and they became extinct. And you are a disaster, a disaster ...
  27. ibirus
    ibirus 22 December 2015 21: 15
    +3
    my personal opinion is why young children should be taught the basics of religion. We have a secular state.
    1. Aljavad
      Aljavad 24 December 2015 03: 15
      +1
      Ibirus RU December 22, 2015 21:15 PM
      my personal opinion is why young children should be taught the basics of religion. We have a secular state.


      So that ISIS-DAISH does not fill the vacuum.
  28. Bijo
    Bijo 22 December 2015 22: 17
    +3
    Concerning the origin of speech in humans. Recently, Professor E.P. Karpeev gave lectures on this topic at St. Petersburg State University, attended and listened, it was very entertaining. So Karpeev argued that if a child under 10 years of age is not taught to speak, then he will never speak, moreover, without speech, it is impossible to develop the brain "I speak means I think." We think in words. Who taught the child to speak, provided that it is impossible for an adult primitive person to master speech, because there is no brain development? The emergence of "human speaking" was rapid and large-scale geographically, how did the evolution of the facial bones, muscles and tendons to be able to speak? Where are the "intermediate" evolutionary skulls? The emergence of speech is a mystery, the debate continues, do we know the truth?
    1. kalibr
      22 December 2015 22: 40
      +1
      This was proved by medieval Indians, who set up such an experiment on children (a certain raja) - they brought up children with deaf-mute servants, in order to find out which language was the most ancient! And the Mowgli girls came out very revealing. And how did it arise? Mutation! Persistent! It helped to multiply, even an advantage ... and it went! Further more and all! Genetics very clearly indicates the localization of the oldest haplogroups.
      1. Bijo
        Bijo 22 December 2015 23: 58
        +1
        Quote: kalibr
        This was proved by medieval Indians, who set up such an experiment on children (a certain raja) - they brought up children with deaf-mute servants, in order to find out which language was the most ancient!

        Yes thank you! He (E.P. Karpeev) mentioned this experience. Maybe mutation, maybe evolution. Karpeev's version - it came from children, or rather from collective children's games. Children playing with each other developed their own "childish language" to denote objects, emotions, that is, they began to think and develop, then growing up, memorizing these "words" continued to communicate with each other, and so speech appeared. Certainly after several tens of generations. In my interpretation it sounds clumsy, I beg your pardon, but in general the professor's version was as follows.
        1. kalibr
          23 December 2015 13: 19
          +1
          In the academic parlance, this is called the "game theory of the origin of language"!
  29. zav
    zav 23 December 2015 11: 00
    +1
    The excerpts below explain the direct relationship between a woman’s ability and desire to give and the development of civilization.

    “... It all started when mother nature decided to get a toy. She was already fed up with a demonstration of her greatness in front of an empty audience. She needed a witness to the manifestations of her unbridled power. Or maybe an active participant in the action and an adviser, or maybe an intellectual interlocutor or, even, some kind of restraining force. So a reasonable man appeared.
    But nature did not appreciate the complexity of the task and all the side effects. After the person was endowed with intelligence, he automatically disappeared animal signs and signs appeared, which until then nature had to deal with. Due to changes in anatomy and physiology, a new man was born as an easily vulnerable, completely incapacitated and devoid of self-preservation instincts screeching lump of living flesh. Without constant supervision and care, he quickly became the prey of predators or died for other reasons. A few years should pass before the moment when a child can service himself at least a little. All these years, his mother has been balancing on the edge of life. The situation demanded that the mother either die of starvation next to the child or let her child die. Or come up with something.
    But a helpless man could, could disappear from the face of the earth! What cost nature to calm down and do other things? It was necessary to consider the experiment a failure and to enable the new invention to die out naturally. But "the gun was bought - you need to shoot yourself." A very surprising and very indecent way out was found. As if anticipating such a turn of events, or, more correctly, introducing corrections during the experiment, mother nature, not realizing herself a full account of what she was doing, awarded the primitive man extraordinary sensuality. The man began to need sexual intercourse with regular, shocking Puritan public regularity. In the absence of coveted contacts, everything began to fall out of hand, an unsteady tremor grew in my knees, an extraneous ringing appeared in my ears, and my thoughts did not stop spinning around the damned sexual matter. After the first symptoms, the man became worried and paid a visit to a familiar sexologist. The traditional healer, not a couple of the current ones, did not obscure and hide the diagnosis from the patient, but prescribed him home therapy sessions (it is unnecessary to explain which ones) "at least three times in two days' hands." And not that the aesculapian could not resist the slight shake of the patient, you can seriously get sick, and even completely lose your skills.
    Mother nature smelled something about the addictions of men, and so as not to quench the fire of desire, over time endowed the female body with all-weather seductive bulges and even more seductive hollows, forming from it an ideal love machine. Of course, I had to give up some useful properties of the body, but this is just the case when there is nobody to complain.
    1. Aljavad
      Aljavad 24 December 2015 03: 19
      0
      Penguin island?
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. zav
    zav 23 December 2015 11: 02
    0
    The following excerpts from a certain article explain the direct relationship between a woman’s ability to give and the development of civilization.
    “... It all started when mother nature decided to get a toy. She was already fed up with a demonstration of her greatness in front of an empty audience. She needed a witness to the manifestations of her unbridled power. Or maybe an active participant in the action and an adviser, or maybe an intellectual interlocutor or, even, some kind of restraining force. So a reasonable man appeared.
    But nature did not appreciate the complexity of the task and all the side effects. After the person was endowed with intelligence, he automatically disappeared animal signs and signs appeared, which until then nature had to deal with. Due to changes in anatomy and physiology, a new man was born as an easily vulnerable, completely incapacitated and devoid of self-preservation instincts screeching lump of living flesh. Without constant supervision and care, he quickly became the prey of predators or died for other reasons. A few years should pass before the moment when a child can service himself at least a little. All these years, his mother has been balancing on the edge of life. The situation demanded that the mother either die of starvation next to the child or let her child die. Or come up with something.
    But a helpless man could, could disappear from the face of the earth! What cost nature to calm down and do other things? It was necessary to consider the experiment a failure and to enable the new invention to die out naturally. But "the gun was bought - you need to shoot yourself." A very surprising and very indecent way out was found. As if anticipating such a turn of events, or, more correctly, introducing corrections during the experiment, mother nature, not realizing herself a full account of what she was doing, awarded the primitive man extraordinary sensuality. The man began to need sexual intercourse with regular, shocking Puritan public regularity. In the absence of coveted contacts, everything began to fall out of hand, an unsteady tremor grew in my knees, an extraneous ringing appeared in my ears, and my thoughts did not stop spinning around the damned sexual matter. After the first symptoms, the man became worried and paid a visit to a familiar sexologist. The traditional healer, not a couple of the current ones, did not obscure and hide the diagnosis from the patient, but prescribed him home therapy sessions (it is unnecessary to explain which ones) "at least three times in two days' hands." And not that the aesculapian could not resist the slight shake of the patient, you can seriously get sick, and even completely lose your skills.
    Mother nature smelled something about the addictions of men, and so as not to quench the fire of desire, over time endowed the female body with all-weather seductive bulges and even more seductive hollows, forming from it an ideal love machine. Of course, I had to give up some useful properties of the body, but this is just the case when there is nobody to complain.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 23 December 2015 16: 16
      +3
      "endowed the female body with all-season seductive bulges and
      even more tempting hollows "//////

      That's right! fellow

      The similarity of female priests and breasts is not at all accidental. Like similarity
      lips and labia. Which side you will not go to - I want ... love
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 24 December 2015 12: 47
    +2
    Somehow I did not think that everything has such an underlying motive on the part of Mother Nature. Strongly, however. I agree.
  34. brn521
    brn521 24 December 2015 17: 44
    +2
    Actually nonsense. Different cultures have different standards. And you can bring it up at all as you like. Make ears a key element, say. A man will see a woman, see her ears on display. And that's it, he will be on the drum, what is there with her chest and ass.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. EvilLion
      EvilLion 12 October 2016 08: 22
      0
      In fact, a man is interested in the female’s suitability for childbearing, and the signs that contribute to this are highly attractive even before puberty. And ears, etc., are superficial.
  35. EvilLion
    EvilLion 12 October 2016 08: 20
    0
    So, mentally, humanity today has been degrading and degrading for a long time, since the appearance of the first cities on the planet, that is, 10 -7 for thousands of years. But this is nothing on a common historical scale, so you don’t need to be particularly scared.


    This was what we had to start with, so that it was immediately clear that we could not read further.
    A person’s mind develops only if you constantly strain it, and before the appearance of a total and universal education, that achievement is already the 20-th century, and even then not everywhere on Earth, 90% have been digging in the earth since 5-6 for all life.