Military Review

Strategic Missile Forces: Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike

60
According to expert estimates, the currently deployed global missile defense system is not capable of reflecting the massive use of the Strategic Missile Forces group, RIA News a message from the Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Sergei Karakaev.


Strategic Missile Forces: Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike


“Specialists' estimates show that the missile defense system currently deployed cannot, with its information and fire capabilities, withstand the massive use of the Strategic Missile Forces grouping,” said the colonel general.

Americans seek to create a more reliable system. According to their estimates, “the integration of different in purpose and characteristics of the means in the new missile defense system will allow organizing a multi-echelon protection system providing“ impact on space and air targets ”on any part of the flight trajectory,” he noted.

“We are talking primarily about the destruction of missiles and warheads of missiles of the Strategic Missile Forces. To this end, it is planned to include laser and kinetic weapons, antimissile and interception complexes of land, sea, air and space-based types, ”Karakaev said.

Recall that the SMF formed December 17 1959.

Help Agency: “The stationed Strategic Missile Forces grouping is made up of complexes with“ heavy ”missiles (PC-20В“ Voyevoda ”, according to the NATO classification -“ Satan ”) and“ light ”(PC-18 (“ Stilet ”), PC-12М2 (“ Topol-M ") classes. The mobile-based grouping includes the Topol mobile soil missile systems with the RS-12М missile, the Topol-M missile system with the PC-12М2 monoblock equipment and the PGRK Yars with the PC-12М2Р missile and a split head mobile and stationary variants of basing ".
Photos used:
press service of the Strategic Missile Forces
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cniza
    cniza 17 December 2015 08: 26 New
    39
    Happy holiday rocket launchers, we believe in you and hope for you.
    1. subbtin.725
      subbtin.725 17 December 2015 09: 00 New
      +4
      Quote: cniza
      Happy holiday rocket launchers, we believe in you and hope for you.

      Apparently, the Yankees are hoping for a miracle .... The group of the Strategic Missile Forces of Russia cooled their aspirations - there will be no miracle.
    2. vodolaz
      vodolaz 17 December 2015 09: 01 New
      +3
      So from the beginning it was clear that all this missile defense was created exclusively for offensive purposes. American guaranteed missile defense Scuds can not get, what can I say?
      1. Blondy
        Blondy 17 December 2015 09: 12 New
        -2
        Strategic Missile Forces: Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike

        Guys, this is not an excuse, but a fairy tale for knocking out money for the national military budget, I probably already tuned it to a whole orchestra.
        1. Talgat
          Talgat 17 December 2015 18: 55 New
          0
          No no. here, saving is inappropriate! Even if someone drank. still have to spend. and who to saw. to catch and how to plant enemies of the people

          We all live in the world for half a century only thanks to nuclear deterrence - we are the children of the atomic world

          I pray for nuclear weapons and SNF, t to my parents. me and my spouse and friends. and my children have been living in the world for 70 years only thanks to him - otherwise nothing would stop the aggressors

          We are not naive fools - everything is clear to everyone

          Only one concern is that the aggressor is developing the technology of "nulling" the nuclear potential, and after the collapse of the USSR we are all weak, will Russia cope? Will we succeed in creating the Eurasian Union and gain strength?
    3. Sweles
      Sweles 17 December 2015 09: 05 New
      +3
      then of course they are not able to oppose the blow, but then what is usually opposed by the West to Russia in case of war? A properly carefully structured and trained FIFTH COLUMN. To recall the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, the commanders of the front-line districts with the chiefs of staff turned out to be traitors, despite the fact that we had more tanks and planes.
    4. Nick
      Nick 17 December 2015 09: 08 New
      +4
      Quote: cniza
      Happy holiday rocket launchers, we believe in you and hope for you.

      Thank you!
      HELLO TO ALL STRATEGIES! HAPPY CONNECTION! SPECIAL CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL 13991 MILITARY SERVICE PERSONNEL AND PERSONALLY 122 KEY
    5. marlin1203
      marlin1203 17 December 2015 09: 48 New
      +3
      "Let’s hit. We’ll definitely hit. The whole world is in dust. But then." laughing soldier
  2. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 17 December 2015 08: 30 New
    +8
    But the output was already other missiles, which are an order of magnitude higher than those described below. They were not taken into account, while the chances of reflection from the US coalition are even less. And the worries of Europe and the USA are even higher. So the elephant is walking the dogs bark!
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 17 December 2015 08: 39 New
      +4
      Quote: dchegrinec
      But the output is already other missiles, which are an order of magnitude higher than those described below. They were not taken into account, while the chances of reflection from the US coalition are even less

      So the Americans are fully deployed their missile defense only by 2018. So one should not calm down - it is necessary to constantly and intensively work on the neutralization of the missile defense of the States. After all, while there is the possibility of the Russian strategic nuclear forces "causing unacceptable damage" to the United States, a global nuclear conflict is impossible. We are for world peace!
      Happy holiday of the Strategic Missile Forces of all involved and complicit! soldier
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 17 December 2015 08: 30 New
    +4
    Western missile defense system will not be able to resist a massive strike

    If the investigator has to (force) to strike, then he must be massed. Maybe the Americans should still think about their future, and the future of the world?
    1. andre
      andre 17 December 2015 08: 39 New
      +2
      Why is it incomprehensible, the missile defense system is another super pie that will be sold to the smaller brothers for "good money." It has long been clear, we will not reach, so we will sail if necessary !!!
  4. Siberia55
    Siberia55 17 December 2015 08: 34 New
    10
    When will Yellowstone wake up there ???
    1. horoh
      horoh 17 December 2015 08: 38 New
      +1
      So it is necessary to help him in this, otherwise he sleeps for a long time winked
  5. Jozhkin Cat
    Jozhkin Cat 17 December 2015 08: 34 New
    +3
    I don’t believe uncle, show me something ... lol repeat
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 17 December 2015 08: 47 New
    +7
    Strategic Missile Forces: Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike
    Strategic Rocket Forces - POWER! Let the adversaries always know. Happy holiday rocket launchers!
  8. tomcat117
    tomcat117 17 December 2015 08: 47 New
    +5
    ... the Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike ...

    Do not lull yourself. The United States will always do everything with the help of fools, such as the Balts, Psheks, Asker, Ukrainians and many others like them, and we will exhaust all the retaliatory measures and opportunities from the Americans at the most inopportune moment.
    We must increase our resources and capabilities without praises and high-profile reports in order to block at times the possibility of destroying everyone and anyone who decides to attack us even with the wrong hands.
  9. Dazzl
    Dazzl 17 December 2015 08: 49 New
    +1
    Happy holidays to all friends!

    Strategic Rocket Forces,
    They’re not hysterical,
    Mentally help, help physically,
    Everyone shines with reason and his personality.
    Nuclear fungus is not terrible to Russian,
    We will cover the enemy with our powerful silushka,
    Happy holiday soldiers, my brothers
    Russian children, motherland sons.
  10. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 17 December 2015 08: 54 New
    0
    It is time for us to deploy our own missile defense system. There are threats of using missile weapons from the countries of the Middle East. Of course, the US missile defense system will not be able to protect against a massive strike (and such tasks are not before it), but from single launches it can be quite effective. We only cover Moscow, the rest of the territory is absolutely vulnerable. So we are waiting for the S-500, which will have to hit ballistic targets in the near space.
    1. just exp
      just exp 17 December 2015 11: 20 New
      0
      not only will the S-500 work for ballistic targets, we also have the A135 missile defense and its replacement A235, for the ballistic targets both the S-400 and S-300B can work (although the possibilities are limited by the speed of the target), and now even the shell beat the same goals.
  11. Alex_59
    Alex_59 17 December 2015 08: 55 New
    +2
    The Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces is certainly right. A massive strike by the American missile defense will not draw out. For now. But do not consider them idiots. Firstly, they will make a lot of effort so that the blow is not massive and that it is reflected. Secondly, they are seriously developing their missile defense, it hasn’t cut money, it’s real. On their way, they are equipping the GBI anti-missile system with multiple warheads, capable of immediately intercepting many targets at one missile launch - that is, our warheads. So far, only the task of identifying MS among false targets has not been solved in principle. But if there are few targets (not a massive blow), they can already completely destroy such a missile defense, both false and not false.
    And our people have such a fog in their heads about missile defense and our Strategic Missile Forces ... Why not read in the comments here. And the trajectory of the ICBMs, and planning warheads, and maneuvering warheads ... There is no end for educational work.
    1. mojohed2012
      mojohed2012 17 December 2015 11: 19 New
      -1
      I totally agree.
      It’s not even a matter of comparing the capabilities of the strategic nuclear forces and missile defense of the United States, but that we won’t be able to give a massive retaliatory nuclear strike, or they will prevent this as much as possible. Often in the fields of various forums, including international experts discuss the strategy of the claimed global strike with hypersonic weapons.
      The fact is that, as I personally think, the shtat troops deployed to our borders in the West are not designed for attacks in the border zone, they are not intended for striking deep into Russian territory on the model of the Wehrmacht actions according to the Barbaross plan. These forces are being deployed at the borders of the Baltic states and Poland to cover missile defense position areas, tactical missile systems and advanced NATO air force jump aerodromes (for example, airplanes with suspended nuclear bombs from the United States, which they generously supply even to irresponsible East Young NATO members). Those. these tank companies and battalions with attached infantry forces, air defense and artillery. Here they will turn around, dig in, then start the EW to jam our air defense and send special forces to the locations of the air defense and missile launchers of ICBMs, clipped locations of the Strategic Missile Forces ground complexes, they will try to attack them first, then they will try to cover the frontier air defense with cruise missiles, then they will try hit with nuclear bombs from planes + will launch all available medium-range missiles to suppress the positions of the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation, and then we will try to answer, we will fire a salvo with what remains of the strategic nuclear forces, but not the same mass will take off, but the group ones Alps remaining serviceable means of strategic nuclear forces.
      1. Alex_59
        Alex_59 17 December 2015 12: 30 New
        +2
        Quote: mojohed2012
        These forces are being deployed at the borders of the Baltic states and Poland to cover missile defense deployment areas.

        Well this is unlikely. 4 of the tank and 100 of the foot soldiers in Latvia is the same zero, but with whistles and fakes. This is pure window dressing. EuroPro and air bases will be killed by Caliber, and in this sense we are doing everything right.
    2. just exp
      just exp 17 December 2015 11: 24 New
      0
      and they are also right in their own way, yes, do not underestimate the Amer’s missile defense, but its revaluation is also evil. The GBI must be in Poland and beat, and not meet the WGM, THAAD is aimed at this, but it is limited in capabilities. sea ​​missiles are not yet available in the middle section, and they aren’t so good at the oncoming lane, their main topic is to hit rockets with SSBNs, which is why ours make a mace and a liner with a faster accelerating section, so that SMs would not catch up. and those that start from the mainland are already inaccessible to them.
      and maneuvering BBs should not be underestimated either, it is not so easy, not impossible to shoot them down, and the task is far from trivial.
  12. bad
    bad 17 December 2015 08: 55 New
    +2
    Happy Holiday Rocketeers! In which case .. don’t blunder, give the adversaries a spark! soldier bully drinks
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 17 December 2015 08: 58 New
      0
      Quote: bad
      ..Do not blunder, give the adversaries a spark!

      I would not want to be within a radius of 30km from this sad
  13. edeligor
    edeligor 17 December 2015 09: 00 New
    +5
    I absolutely agree with the author. I remember earlier, when I argued that the American missile defense was zilch and could not withstand a massive blow, I was actively minuscated. In general, their entire system of global disarming strike is a fiction, like the memorable SDI, and the goals are the same ... And the last. Happy holiday rocket launchers! I can congratulate myself with a little stretch, as I began my service in the Strategic Missile Forces, in the village of Sibirsky 2 in the Altai Territory.
  14. bad
    bad 17 December 2015 09: 02 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: bad
    ..Do not blunder, give the adversaries a spark!

    I would not want to be within a radius of 30km from this sad
    ... I also would not want bully because this is the weapon of the "last blow" ..
    The principle of inevitability: why the Strategic Missile Forces are called the “last word” troops - Zvezda Channel
    http://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201512170733-qj4f.htm
  15. kapitan92
    kapitan92 17 December 2015 09: 05 New
    +7
    Quote: Alex_59
    The Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces is certainly right. A massive strike by the American missile defense will not draw out. For now. But do not consider them idiots. Firstly, they will make a lot of effort so that the blow is not massive and that it is reflected. Secondly, they are seriously developing their missile defense, it hasn’t cut money, it’s real. On their way, they are equipping the GBI anti-missile system with multiple warheads, capable of immediately intercepting many targets at one missile launch - that is, our warheads. So far, only the task of identifying MS among false targets has not been solved in principle. But if there are few targets (not a massive blow), they can already completely destroy such a missile defense, both false and not false.
    And our people have such a fog in their heads about missile defense and our Strategic Missile Forces ... Why not read in the comments here. And the trajectory of the ICBMs, and planning warheads, and maneuvering warheads ... There is no end for educational work.

    The topic is interesting and controversial. We have heard a lot of statements. Recall the beginning of the General Staff Kvashnin, Makarov. I would like to believe the head of the Strategic Missile Forces.
    I'm more interested in the question of whether our missile defense and air defense will be able to intercept a massive strike of cruise missiles in the amount of 5000 units if Russia is attacked from all directions.
    True, the Perimeter will remain, but this is little consolation.
    1. Alex_59
      Alex_59 17 December 2015 09: 23 New
      +3
      Quote: kapitan92
      I'm more interested in the question of whether our missile defense and air defense will be able to intercept a massive strike of cruise missiles in the amount of 5000 units if Russia is attacked from all directions.

      Of course not. Even 5000 is not necessary. And 1000 is not intercepted. And no one will intercept. Of course, some part will disappear, but not all, and then if we are ready in advance. Although the situation is facilitated by our geography, in order for Tomahawk to shoot at Dombarovsky it is necessary to go into the throat of the White Sea or into the Kara Sea. Nobody will let Americans hang around freely. But in Novosib or Krasnoyarsk they will not be shot at all. For now.
      Quote: kapitan92
      True, the Perimeter will remain, but this is little consolation.
      This thing is very secret, but I assume that it is configured to "otvetku" only by a signal from the SPRN. And if we are attacked as mentioned above, with the help of the Kyrgyz Republic - then what kind of "Perimeter" can it be? Manual control only.
      1. Beaver
        Beaver 17 December 2015 10: 24 New
        0
        There is EW to help.
      2. Extraneous
        Extraneous 17 December 2015 11: 37 New
        0
        "Perimeter" is a fully automatic system based on the analysis of data from various seismic, meteorological, and radiation sensors scattered throughout the country, plus the state of energy and communication systems is analyzed. If there are changes in the sum of the parameters leading to the conclusion that a nuclear strike is received and there is no connection with the KPSS, all available nuclear weapons are launched automatically.
        At present, reconstruction is underway on a more modern automatic launch control system with the addition of automatic correction missiles and launch control from nuclear submarines
      3. maratkoRuEkb
        maratkoRuEkb 17 December 2015 12: 20 New
        0
        I read that the perimeter has seismic sensors and with a massive strike by cruise missiles it will record the defeat of our command posts. The system will start in this case in automatic mode. So a retaliatory strike is guaranteed even in the absence of live personnel.
      4. DobryAAH
        DobryAAH 17 December 2015 16: 09 New
        0
        In our northern seas by itself. But as an indicator of their serious intentions: they should massively enter the fleet from the Kyrgyz Republic into the Black Sea.
        Their marine component KR-5000 and 2000 are land-based. Only the Finns and the Baltic states will place the land, if they want to get targets in the center.
    2. Yak-3P
      Yak-3P 17 December 2015 09: 29 New
      +1
      the lionfish has too much flying time - they are all subsonic so far - there are known cases of the downing of Shilka in Iraq - so they will thinn them out ..
  16. chikenous59
    chikenous59 17 December 2015 09: 08 New
    +2
    Neither their missile defense system will not withstand a massive blow, nor our system will not withstand a massive blow. This is an obvious fact. So it’s better not to bring matters to a nuclear war.
    1. Vita vko
      Vita vko 17 December 2015 09: 18 New
      0
      Quote: chikenous59
      This is an obvious fact.

      It is possible for Russia, but unlikely for the West. There will probably be hotheads in the United States who want to strike at Russia from under the leaky umbrella of the European missile defense, especially since in this case a retaliatory strike will follow Europe, and not the United States, which has repeatedly framed its partners.
      1. scientist
        scientist 17 December 2015 13: 24 New
        +1
        Quote: Vita VKO
        . In the United States, there will probably be hotheads who want to strike at Russia from under the leaky umbrella of EuroPro

        It’s like the saying “Man is the king of animals! It’s a pity the animals just don’t know about it”
      2. DobryAAH
        DobryAAH 17 December 2015 16: 14 New
        +1
        Everything will start with local skirmishes in Ukraine, BV, then it will spread to the EU. We will tear all.
  17. bad
    bad 17 December 2015 09: 11 New
    +2
    Quote: kapitan92
    Quote: Alex_59
    The Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces is certainly right. A massive strike by the American missile defense will not draw out. For now. But do not consider them idiots. Firstly, they will make a lot of effort so that the blow is not massive and that it is reflected. Secondly, they are seriously developing their missile defense, it hasn’t cut money, it’s real. On their way, they are equipping the GBI anti-missile system with multiple warheads, capable of immediately intercepting many targets at one missile launch - that is, our warheads. So far, only the task of identifying MS among false targets has not been solved in principle. But if there are few targets (not a massive blow), they can already completely destroy such a missile defense, both false and not false.
    And our people have such a fog in their heads about missile defense and our Strategic Missile Forces ... Why not read in the comments here. And the trajectory of the ICBMs, and planning warheads, and maneuvering warheads ... There is no end for educational work.

    The topic is interesting and controversial. We have heard a lot of statements. Recall the beginning of the General Staff Kvashnin, Makarov. I would like to believe the head of the Strategic Missile Forces.
    I'm more interested in the question of whether our missile defense and air defense will be able to intercept a massive strike of cruise missiles in the amount of 5000 units if Russia is attacked from all directions.
    True, the Perimeter will remain, but this is little consolation.
    ... in my opinion, consolations will not help anyone in this case .. there will be a compensation, and it will be uniquely as severe as possible .. because we are still alive and free .. hi
  18. gregor6549
    gregor6549 17 December 2015 09: 14 New
    0
    In principle, neither the Russian missile defense system nor the American one will be able to withstand a massive combined attack of air attack weapons (CVN). It is more or less reliable to cover air defense / missile defense only with certain zones on the territory of both states.
    Of course, the Americans are struggling to ensure the possibility of a guaranteed destruction of Russia's IOS, but all those who understand these matters, including the Americans, understand that this is nothing more than an illusion.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 17 December 2015 10: 30 New
      0
      Aegis US missile defense system has reached its goal: intercepting medium-range missiles
      on a high trajectory. Most Chinese missiles are precisely
      such. The nearest destroyer shoots at a rocket, if the miss is the target
      passed to the next. This creates the depth of missile defense.

      Interception of ICBMs not resolved, or rather, resolved with a probability of about 30-50%
      and only on certain trajectories - through the Pacific Ocean. Those. one by one
      An ICBM launched from the Far East will have to shoot about 3 missiles from Alaska.
      The interception of ICBMs fired through the North Pole is not considered.
      1. mojohed2012
        mojohed2012 17 December 2015 11: 35 New
        0
        The Pentagon is constantly talking about strengthening the Arctic theater of war, including missile defense and air defense systems, but only missile defense systems remain deployed in Alaska, to the north of Alaska they do not build and deployed nothing of the sort (at least there is no information about this anywhere).
        And their interception zones in theory are:
        1. SM-3 and GBI missiles from Poland and the Baltic states, Japan, Turkey ?! on the take-off paths of our missiles.
        2. On an ascending trajectory and during a flight in the upper atmosphere, the near space, is SM-3 from ships with the Aegis system.
        3. On the trajectory of the descending (approaching) to the United States - Missile defense from Alaska / other territories in the United States + medium-range air defense systems, and all that is on the cover of the country's immediate strategic facilities.

        In Russia, the ABM as a type of troops and means of interception does not exist at all. We can only bring down C-300 / 400 and 500 on approaching their missiles to our cities !? something, well, Bukami, maybe we’ll try all.
        1. Alex_59
          Alex_59 17 December 2015 12: 41 New
          0
          So I say, it’s hard with our people ...
          Quote: mojohed2012
          1. SM-3 and GBI missiles from Poland and the Baltic states, Japan, Turkey ?! on the take-off paths of our missiles.

          Poland, the Baltic states and so on are not on the trajectory of the take-off of our missiles. In the worst case, the trajectories of our missiles lie over Sweden, Norway, and Finland. This is only when starting from Kaluga / Ivanovo. The rest is still to the east - over the White, Kara Seas.
          Quote: mojohed2012
          2. On an ascending trajectory and during a flight in the upper atmosphere, the near space, is SM-3 from ships with the Aegis system.
          What near space are you talking about? RGCh over Novaya Zemlya is already at an altitude of more than 600 km. SM-3 barely reached 200 km. It is impossible to make a normal interceptor of ICBMs in the existing dimensions of the VPU Mk.41.

          Quote: mojohed2012
          3. On the trajectory of the descending (approaching) to the United States - Missile defense from Alaska / other territories in the United States + medium-range air defense systems, and all that is on the cover of the country's immediate strategic facilities.

          No anti-aircraft missile defense is shooting down. Only GBI and out of the atmosphere. Have you seen the Chelyabinsk meteorite? 20 seconds from an altitude of 40 km to zero. What nafig air defense? The calculation commander only has time to open his mouth - as it breaks up into molecules along with the entire air defense.
          Quote: mojohed2012
          In Russia, the ABM as a type of troops and means of interception does not exist at all.

          53T6.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 17 December 2015 16: 37 New
          0
          They don’t have enough warheads for cities - 1580 warheads willn’t be enough even for all our military facilities.
      2. DobryAAH
        DobryAAH 17 December 2015 16: 19 New
        0
        30-50%? In space, ICBM, half a liter to smithereens? Yes, I have them !!!
        At least 10 of our 1500 warheads were shot down, I would believe.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  19. Gor-1974
    Gor-1974 17 December 2015 09: 19 New
    0
    The question is, who knows, hypothetically, if the Arctic is mined as much as possible, with good charges and bang, will there be enough total power to melt the glaciers and cause a global flood?
    1. Mikhail m
      Mikhail m 17 December 2015 09: 44 New
      +1
      The answer in the physics textbook is a class of about 6-7, and it is disappointing. The source is not secret, but not comprehensible to everyone.
  20. Aleksander
    Aleksander 17 December 2015 09: 21 New
    +1
    Strategic Missile Forces: Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike


    Not Russia started all the most terrible wars, but always suffered huge losses at the beginning of wars, because initiative, and therefore advantage, were on the side of the aggressors. I will express seditious thought - if it comes to the very last edge, this time it is necessary do the opposite: "22 of June 1941 must never be repeated!"
  21. AlexTires
    AlexTires 17 December 2015 09: 34 New
    +1
    All involved in the Strategic Missile Forces - with a holiday !!!! soldier
  22. An64
    An64 17 December 2015 09: 35 New
    +1
    Strategic Missile Forces: Western missile defense system will not be able to withstand a massive strike


    I believe that the American missile defense system will not reflect a single strike of the Strategic Missile Forces.

    And all the troops of the Strategic Missile Forces - WITH A HOLIDAY !!! HAPPY RVSN !!!
  23. chikenous59
    chikenous59 17 December 2015 09: 37 New
    +3
    Quote: Gor-1974
    The question is, who knows, hypothetically, if the Arctic is mined as much as possible, with good charges and bang, will there be enough total power to melt the glaciers and cause a global flood?

    Noah, are you this? winked
    You don’t want to live?
  24. raid14
    raid14 17 December 2015 09: 39 New
    0
    US plans for a preventive non-nuclear strike on Russia's strategic nuclear forces are being actively developed taking into account the construction of Euro-missile defense and new hypersonic missiles X-51
  25. BOB044
    BOB044 17 December 2015 09: 39 New
    +1
    Their- PRO is Ronald Reagan's Star Wars. Bluffing and not being able to withstand our strategic missile forces.
  26. Samoyed
    Samoyed 17 December 2015 09: 47 New
    +2
    The main business of the West is in the blood. And NATO is imprisoned for this, the flow of drugs from Afghanistan has grown tenfold. And the USSR built hospitals and schools there. And what the NATO members are doing in the Baltic states - they urgently pissed the windows. Yes, after all, in Afghanistan too, they urinated on holy books. Hamye!
  27. Yurich
    Yurich 17 December 2015 09: 50 New
    0
    Strategic Rocket Forces - you are pride and stronghold!
    Elite always called you
    Rocketeers are a special people
    You combined mind and duty perfectly.
    Strategic Rocket Forces ... we gave our lives to you
    Counting the time from the cadets' bast,
    Who became a general, who is a captain
    Missile strategic habits.
    Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan ...
    At many training sites we served
    And loyal, as before, to the Poplars,
    The combat duty was not forgotten.
    We will remember everyone with whom the service brought us together,
    How they lived in provincial garrisons ...
    So let’s drink today for the troops,
    For memory and for the past in uniform!
    Homeland entrusted us with peace,
    They served her and kept the honor holy!
    Any order would execute it ...
    But we better not fight, guys ...
    Serious Strategic Rocket Forces troops!
    We have inspired respect in the world ...
    Now we live without nuclear problems ...
    And the rest drowned in alcohol ...
    A little sad ... there is a reason
    - Indeed, in the past, youth, and with it the years of service
    Today's toast is the Strategic Rocket Forces and an honor!
    Come on for us! And for male friendship!
  28. Old26
    Old26 17 December 2015 09: 52 New
    0
    Quote: Alex_59
    The Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces is certainly right. A massive strike by the American missile defense will not draw out. For now. But do not consider them idiots.

    In general, no missile defense system can withstand a massive strike. That is why, in order not to give a push to a new round of the arms race, an ABM treaty was concluded at one time. For this spiral could be untwisted infinitely.
    The US missile defense is now hardly global. It is rather a journalistic stamp. There has always been talk about NMD - a national missile defense system for the defense of the United States. But it is not deployed in sufficient quantities. Those 3-4 dozen weather interceptor missiles will not do. At best, what they can do is intercept ALL DPRK missiles. But the interception of all Chinese, they will not pull, not to mention the Russian.

    Quote: Alex_59
    Firstly, they will make a lot of effort so that the blow is not massive and that it is reflected. Secondly, they are seriously developing their missile defense, it hasn’t cut money, it’s real. On their way, they are equipping the GBI anti-missile system with multiple warheads, capable of immediately intercepting many targets at one missile launch - that is, our warheads.

    You dear, seditious thoughts here issue. The absolute majority firmly believes that the American missile defense is firstly complete bullshit, secondly the most ambitious cut laughing

    Quote: Alex_59

    And our people have such a fog in their heads about missile defense and our Strategic Missile Forces ... Why not read in the comments here. And the trajectory of the ICBMs, and planning warheads, and maneuvering warheads ... There is no end for educational work.

    Alas, it will be an ungrateful occupation to conduct educational work. Many people firmly believe in flat trajectories, and in planning BGs, and in maneuvering BGs. For them they already have. And some even believe that these already maneuvering BGs still have false goals and an ultra-powerful electronic warfare system capable of drowning out everything

    Quote: dchegrinec
    But the output is already other missiles, which are an order of magnitude higher than those described below. They were not taken into account, while the chances of reflection from the US coalition are even less

    The construction of any missile defense system is calculated not only on existing, but also on promising missiles. And new ones - why are they an order of magnitude higher than existing ones, I would like to know ...

    Quote: kapitan92
    I'm more interested in the question of whether our missile defense and air defense will be able to intercept a massive strike of cruise missiles in the amount of 5000 units if Russia is attacked from all directions.

    No. Nobody can do this, no air defense system

    Quote: edeligor
    I absolutely agree with the author. I remember earlier, when I argued that the American missile defense was zilch and could not withstand a massive blow, I was actively minuscated.

    Never mind. I am also often neglected when I write that Euro-missile defense is not against our ICBMs ...
    1. Alex_59
      Alex_59 17 December 2015 10: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      Alas, it will be an ungrateful occupation to conduct educational work. Many people firmly believe in flat trajectories, and in planning BGs, and in maneuvering BGs. For them they already are. And some even believe that these already maneuvering BGs still have false goals and an ultra-powerful electronic warfare system capable of drowning out everything

      Yes, the lesson is not easy. The people do not like physics, it is too tricky. How to quickly explain to a person who does not know Newton’s laws that it makes no sense to use maneuvering warheads along with false goals? It's hard to say the least ...
      Quote: Old26
      I am also often neglected when I write that Euro-missile defense is not against our ICBMs ...

      And here it is not so simple. I, too, was deeply convinced that EuroPro could not intercept our ICBMs until I found a translation of one American report on this issue. It turns out that the 3-step GBI with an intercept speed at the end of the active section of more than 8 km / s can, after launching from the Czech Republic, catch up with our ICBM launched from Ivanovo / Kaluga, starting in the USA, while its speed is low (3-6 km / s). This is of course a drop in the ocean, our Strategic Missile Forces Kaluga and Ivanovo are not limited. But still.
      Plus, it turns out to be a problem that the American missile defense radars in the Czech Republic observe the flight of our ICBMs at the time of the withdrawal of warheads and false targets, i.e. they can track the breeding algorithm and capture the trajectories of false targets. By quickly transferring this information to the USA, it is theoretically possible to implement a mechanism for selecting false targets and use this when intercepting over the territory of the USA.
  29. Yurich
    Yurich 17 December 2015 09: 58 New
    0
    All missile launchers on the occasion!
  30. cap
    cap 17 December 2015 10: 03 New
    0
    “Specialists' estimates show that the missile defense system currently deployed cannot, with its information and fire capabilities, withstand the massive use of the Strategic Missile Forces grouping,” said the colonel general.
    I had no doubt from the first day of service in valiant troops back in 1975 and now retired.
    Happy holiday fellow soldiers from 57301. Health and many years!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 17 December 2015 16: 41 New
      0
      Progress does not stand still; today they cannot intercept their missile defense, but tomorrow, who knows.
  31. mamont5
    mamont5 17 December 2015 10: 38 New
    0
    Quote: subbtin.725
    Quote: cniza
    Happy holiday rocket launchers, we believe in you and hope for you.

    Apparently, the Yankees are hoping for a miracle .... The group of the Strategic Missile Forces of Russia cooled their aspirations - there will be no miracle.

    Yes, no one will strike through missile defense. First, all this missile defense will be thinned and extinguished, and only then the strategic missile forces will come.
  32. iouris
    iouris 17 December 2015 12: 13 New
    0
    No one knows exactly what will happen if ...
    Happy Holidays!
  33. pts-m
    pts-m 17 December 2015 12: 32 New
    0
    Under the crown of TOPOL, there is always coolness and high spirits. Despite the hot swoops of coalitions of geyrops and sowing America. Good luck to our designers in growing “exotic trees” able to cool the ardor of the suffering fiery hell. Happy Holiday Strategic Rocket Forces!
  34. Leprekon
    Leprekon 17 December 2015 13: 23 New
    0
    Yes, the democrats of the West, the Russian Strategic Missile Forces, this is not Popcorn, you won’t eat much!
  35. The comment was deleted.