Match TV, or Players are asked to get out of the field

200
Match TV is inviolable. This is a statement, not a question. If you touched on journalists and the general producer of Match-TV, then you will be cut out. The question is not in the Russophobic position of the journalists of this channel, the question is not in the Russophobic position of the general producer, the question is that “someone” took these people to work. And it is “someone” who cuts out any mention of this from the air.

Vladimir Solovyov on the radio station “Vesti” coyly spoke about the corporate policy of the channel, etc., but did not mention that the TVC cut out the story about the condemnation of Russophobic statements by the journalists of Match TV. A founder of the TVC is the government of Moscow. It seems to be close, almost at hand, but questions remain.

And without that, the scandalous TV channel Match-TV managed to make well-founded claims to answer enchantingly stupid (in the person of Tinatina Givievna Kandelaki). She has already distinguished herself by saying that there are no Russians, she simply does not. There is anyone - Match TV, her career, her selfie, but there are no Russians.

Okay, you can say, "blurted out for youth." It can be said that "the channel is not responding." Can. But for these people, in my opinion, inciting ethnic hatred, Tinatin Givievna stood up in the most ridiculous way. At the same time, she added: “Watch Match-TV”. No, well, I, of course, understand the students that they are engaged in such clumsy and persistent advertising, but the general producer ...

Match TV, or Players are asked to get out of the field


About Andronov and Utkin said a lot. But it was they who made up the “face” of the channel with their scandalousness. And therefore, when a “pig farm” is heard against Match TV, I am not surprised. And even more so when the general producer is more busy with his figure and its indispensable demonstration to the general public. True, since taking office, Tinatin immediately fell ill with sports ... at the stadium ... sometimes ... publicly ... Judging by her twitter. Or is she ill with mumps? Just in case, as recently in the 2006 year, when, together with Suleiman Kerimov (the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia) in Nice, she dug into a tree at Ferrari Enzo. But who knows, maybe it works out of habit? As in the 2009 year, when she led an illegal party on the cruiser Aurora.









What can you say? Hand washes. After all, Andronov was not far from Kandelaki. And about the last photo in the elevator, thank you for not in the toilet. But! The question is not removed. Who are these "someone" who are responsible for personnel? For such frames.

More said only Nikita Mikhalkov.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

200 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +84
    16 December 2015 09: 14
    Match TV is untouchable
    . no, this tinochka is inviolable ... and you can’t call it on the site by its real name. recourse
    1. +117
      16 December 2015 09: 19
      Mistress of a pig farm. Ober-cowgirl, so to speak.
      1. +13
        16 December 2015 09: 22
        Quote: Banshee
        Mistress of a pig farm. Ober-cowgirl, so to speak.

        rescued Roma, thank you ... hi
        1. +44
          16 December 2015 09: 49
          And there is also a very beautiful term that directly corresponds to the content - "stock depot"!
          1. +9
            17 December 2015 10: 01
            Mistress of a pig farm. Ober-cowgirl, so to speak.


            The feeling that they did not even look at what Mikhalkov was talking about.

            Like children in a sandbox call names.

            Kondalaki co-comrades openly declare their denial of the Russian world.
            Then, federal television channels remove from the air those who do not agree with the opinion of the head of the channel.
            Soloviev mutters something about ethics.

            And here are the children’s name-calling.
            Or is there no opinion on this issue?
            1. +5
              17 December 2015 12: 16
              That's the trouble! SAMA Tina Candelabrum denies the Russian world!
              Probably conducted a census inside the garden ring!
              Life is over ...
            2. +9
              17 December 2015 12: 19
              Temples
              Yes, everyone watched, but what can I say?
              Everyone understands
              If there was nothing to lose in this life, one could go crucify on Andronov’s pillar and burn the Tinatinka ... but there is something to lose, so it remains to call names from impotent malice!
          2. +10
            17 December 2015 10: 05
            ... Lena to Paris was stupid and flat,
            And now the third size and lips, like Malinovskaya’s,
            And once they asked her, and she said:
            "I did not pump, they gave me love"...
            feat. Kravets, Every
        2. +2
          16 December 2015 11: 25
          Hand, washes a hand?
          1. +9
            18 December 2015 08: 03
            Quote: Vikings
            Hand, washes a hand?


            Daddy bought the girl a canal. She is a "great sports specialist". Well, I made such a glamorous suck interspersed with broadcasts. What brains, such is the level of the channel. It's strange just that the VGTRK is state-owned, and the state is being watered. But what can you do, the Russian Federation is a country of victorious bourgeoisie, and they have no concept of the Motherland. The main thing is profit.
      2. +4
        16 December 2015 17: 38
        Yes, it's easier THIS is called ... - PIG! laughing
      3. +5
        17 December 2015 11: 27
        Probably more correct will be the slider.
      4. 0
        17 December 2015 20: 24
        Do not offend the owners of pig farms. With this normal, only pigs from the human population can live.
      5. +5
        18 December 2015 09: 21
        Quote: Banshee
        Mistress of a pig farm. Ober-cowgirl, so to speak.

        I won’t taste the guys, but does this mud from a Georgian have such a weight that NSM banned? Or is it true? in the cinema they said I don’t remember in some yeah less and less in the Russian mafia of the indigenous population, and why are we going to chew on snot? laughing
    2. +16
      16 December 2015 09: 19
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      no, this tinochka is inviolable ... and you can’t call it on the site by its real name.

      Which one? By the full name of Tinatin? wink Does mentioning the real name Kandelaki cause infernal forces in our world? wassat
      1. +5
        16 December 2015 09: 39
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        no, this tinochka is inviolable ... and you can’t call it on the site by its real name.

        Which one? By the full name of Tinatin? wink Does mentioning the real name Kandelaki cause infernal forces in our world? wassat

        bad with an understanding of sarcasm, and a sense of humor? sorry...
        1. +3
          16 December 2015 09: 56
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          bad with an understanding of sarcasm, and a sense of humor? sorry..

          It seems that you, dear, have problems with sarcasm and a sense of humor. Even the appropriate emoticons do not help you understand the meaning of the comment. I explain toga - it was just humor. A joke, so to speak.
          1. 0
            16 December 2015 10: 02
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            It seems that you, dear, have problems with sarcasm and a sense of humor. Even the appropriate emoticons do not help you understand the meaning of the comment.

            where do we really ... like "queen" also like it, but we understand everything differently ... request
            1. +39
              16 December 2015 11: 31
              Quote: Ami du peuple
              Ami du peuple

              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              Andrey Yuryevich


              You still have to fight the hot Finnish guys ... just talk about one thing in different words and you can’t understand each other ... open an explanatory dictionary at least .. to teach you everything ... slobs ..

              Tina .. The meaning of the word Tina according to Ephraim:
              Tina - 1. Green algae floating in a dense mass in stagnant and low-flowing water.
              2. trans. That which deprives the will, freedom of action.

              Meaning of the word Tina by Ozhegov:
              Tina - Algae floating in a dense mass in stagnant or low-flowing water and forming a viscous bottom along with silt
              Tina Situation of stagnation, inertness, quagmire N2

              Meaning of the word Tina in the dictionary of Ushakov:
              TINA
              tina, many no, w. 1. Algae, as well as aquatic mosses and aquatic willow plants, floating in a dense congestion in water and when settling together with silt, form a muddy, viscous bottom. The oar is bogged down in mud. 2. trans., Why. What entangles, sucks, deprives freedom of thought and action (book.). I plunged into the mud unclean of small thoughts, small passions. Nekrasov. In 1914, all of Europe was bogged down in the mud of war. The mud of the philistines sucked him.

              The meaning of the word Tina in the Dahl dictionary:
              Tina
              g. filament, Chara fibrous water plant, Archer, or Conferva, water moss, frog silk, app. greenhouse, in stagnant waters, yuzhn. Shmara, East shmara; she, in tangled shreds, sits on the bottom of the lakes, interfering with silt, and forms a viscous, marshy bottom (but mud does not silt). Karas loves tin. In debt, that in mud. He doesn’t touch the mud, climb. | Tina, psk. potato tops, kina, whale. Muddy greens. Muddy Lake. Stagnant water tinovaty. Tininess, Tinnitus, Comp. by value verb Fading or fading, overgrowing with mud, The pond is fading, has faded

              and Tinatin split into two parts ... Tina tin as an outstanding swamp.

              shit shorter ...
              1. +8
                16 December 2015 17: 47
                Quote: vorobey
                The meaning of the word Tina in the Dahl dictionary:
                Tina
                g. filament, Chara fibrous water plant, Archer, or Conferva, water moss, frog silk, app. greenhouse, in stagnant waters, yuzhn. shmara, east shmara;

                You can’t say better, SMARA ...
            2. 0
              17 December 2015 19: 20
              It was necessary not to answer - and so everything is clear: "Girls are cooler!"
      2. +8
        16 December 2015 09: 47
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Does mentioning the real name Kandelaki cause infernal forces in our world?

        by the way, she called her a teacher in politics a woman Valera N. So with caution, be careful)
        1. 0
          16 December 2015 10: 05
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          By the way, she called her teacher in politics a woman Valera
          laughing
    3. +15
      16 December 2015 09: 24
      Vladimir Rudolfovich Solovyov

      Tinatina Ganievna Kandelaki

      Andronov and Utkin

      Who are all these people?
      1. +3
        16 December 2015 09: 25
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Who are all these people?

        Have you been banned in Google? smile
        1. +8
          16 December 2015 09: 27
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          Quote: podpolkovnik
          Who are all these people?

          Have you been banned in Google? smile

          Sarkamism (Greek σαρκασμός, from σαρκάζω, literally “breaking the flesh”) is one of the types of satirical exposing, a venomous mockery [1], the highest degree of irony, based not only on the heightened contrast of the implied and expressed, but also on the immediate intentional exposure of the implied.
          Sarcasm is a mockery that can be opened by a positive judgment, but in general it always contains a negative hue and indicates a lack of a person, object or phenomenon, that is, what is happening in relation to what is happening. Like satire, sarcasm encompasses the struggle with hostile phenomena of reality through ridiculing them. Ruthlessness, sharpness of exposure is a distinctive feature of sarcasm. In contrast to irony, sarcasm finds its expression the highest degree of indignation, hatred. Sarcasm is never a characteristic device of a humorist who, revealing the funny in reality, always portrays her with a certain amount of sympathy and sympathy.
          1. -10
            16 December 2015 09: 39
            Love Wikipedia - a source of knowledge! bully
            1. +1
              16 December 2015 10: 07
              Well man, you’re obviously not from Russia ... have you sold for a long time for 30 silver coins?
              Lyayayaya ... do not understand the simplest expression ...
            2. +2
              16 December 2015 10: 26
              Quote: Ami du peuple
              Love Wikipedia - a source of knowledge! bully
              Baris Barisych without Nadezhdin, says the same ... laughing
              1. 0
                17 December 2015 19: 44
                That’s what, here’s an elderly human rights activist Alekseeva who believes that Russian slaves are at the genetic level http://www.politnavigator.net/rossijjskaya-pravozashhitnica-rasskazala-o-genetic

                heskojj-raznice-mezhdu-ukraincami-i-russkimi-vsemu-vinojj-orda.html
      2. 0
        16 December 2015 09: 42
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Who are all these people?

        Vladimir Rudolfovich Soloviev (born October 20, 1963, Moscow) is a Russian journalist, television and radio host, writer, publicist, actor, singer and public figure. PhD in Economics.
        Tinatin (Tina) Givievna Kandelaki (Georgian თინათინ კანდელაკი; born November 10, 1975, Tbilisi) is a Russian journalist, TV presenter, producer and public figure. Co-owner of the Apostol media company.
        You will find the rest, not small smile
        1. +4
          16 December 2015 10: 02
          Quote: Bayonet
          Vladimir Rudolfovich Solovyov (born October 20, 1963, Moscow) - ... actor, singer and public figure.

          Thank you for your help, camera ... It’s like ... Upper fa and pearls of acting ... I didn’t know about his hypostases. Singer, then ... No, I won’t change the ringtone.
          1. +8
            16 December 2015 13: 20
            actor, singer and public figure

            Russian journalist ... He’s just a Jew laughing
            1. +6
              17 December 2015 19: 31
              And not just a Jew - he is an active "worker" of the Jewish Congress of Russia. This organization is generally called differently, but the essence is the same - under the talk about the "Russian-Jewish" Russian hostel, about peace and tolerance, a struggle is being waged against Orthodoxy and, in general, with any manifestations of Russian national identity. After all, it is no secret to which nationality almost 100% of artists, journalists, TV presenters and other employees of organizations designed to brainwash us belong. I’m not even talking about the nationality of the politicians: you won’t find a Russian with a lantern — at least a part of a certain blood — let it be. What kind of independence can we talk about then?
              1. +1
                18 December 2015 08: 30
                Correctly spell out. In the very essence, so to speak, indicate wink
      3. +32
        16 December 2015 09: 45
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Andronov and Utkin
        Who are all these people?

        two fat hogs leading a sports balcony. It is as if an anorexic woman was cooking a program, fainting every five minutes.
        1. +6
          16 December 2015 10: 28
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          It is as if an anorexic woman was cooking a program, fainting every five minutes.

          no no ! better pregnant with toxicosis Yes It would be more spectacular!
        2. +4
          16 December 2015 14: 34
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          Quote: podpolkovnik
          Andronov and Utkin
          Who are all these people?

          two fat hogs leading a sports balcony. ...

          sucks leading sports nonsense
      4. +8
        16 December 2015 09: 51
        Yes, no one claims that these are people! request laughing
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. avt
        +6
        16 December 2015 10: 20
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Who are all these people?

        "Dear Russians" understand. "People of the World"
      7. +3
        16 December 2015 12: 54
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Who are all these people?

        I have the same question, about Mrs. Kandelaki I heard only a glimpse, but about the gentlemen you listed and the Match-TV channel I hear for the first time, thanks to this article, and this despite the fact that I watch TV more than once in year...

        So the logical question arises - maybe you should not pay attention to the blathering of a bunch of marginals who came up with a marginal TV channel for the same marginals as they are, and most importantly - of which only a bunch of marginals know too?
        1. +4
          16 December 2015 14: 44
          Quote: Albert1988
          ... it's the first time I've ever heard about the gentlemen you listed and the Match-TV channel, thanks to this article, and this despite the fact that I watch TV more often than once a year ...

          So the logical question arises - maybe you should not pay attention to the blathering of a bunch of marginals who came up with a marginal TV channel for the same marginals as they are, and most importantly - of which only a bunch of marginals know too?

          how can I tell you - there was a Russia Sport channel, not so much - but nothing, but the fact that it got embarrassed (Match TV) got even worse, what the hell is it for? And how not to pay attention if it is all sport?
          1. +2
            16 December 2015 15: 44
            Quote: poquello
            how can I tell you - there was a Russia Sport channel, not so much - but nothing, but the fact that it got embarrassed (Match TV) got even worse, what the hell is it for? And how not to pay attention if it is all sport?

            Yes, the fact of the matter is that I do not have such a channel in the standard package ... But I don’t take any extensions myself, because I get most of the information from the TV, but I search on the Internet myself.

            And by the way, it seems to me that you answered one of the questions of the article and some members of the forum - "why are these characters covered from above." The answer is clear - if all sports are broadcasted on this channel, then the owners may well be afraid that a public focus on the statements and beliefs of its hosts will in modern conditions seriously reduce the channel's rating, and therefore reduce their profits.
          2. +2
            17 December 2015 19: 59
            Russia-2 still somehow looked, but from this product (they themselves call their own channel) it turns it off. They manage the channel of mediocrity, led by this runaway Georgian dentist. Let her return to her historical homeland if there is no Russian for her, or let her mouth be sewn up.
        2. 0
          17 December 2015 12: 27
          Quote: Albert1988
          So a logical question arises - maybe you should not pay attention to the blathering of a bunch of marginals who came up with a marginal TV channel for the same marginals

          The TV channel is a weapon of the information war. Machine gun 7,62 - maybe you should not pay attention? Not 8 inches. And not even 6.
        3. +3
          18 December 2015 09: 49
          Golden words! Who is this? I haven’t watched this channel, and now I definitely won’t. There are not a lot of advertisements for this rabble. The unknown and the absence of advertisements are like the death of these individuals. For it’s a penny in rubles.
      8. +1
        18 December 2015 14: 33
        Quote: podpolkovnik
        Vladimir Rudolfovich Solovyov

        Tinatina Ganievna Kandelaki

        Andronov and Utkin

        Who are all these people?

        These are not people. These are reptilians.
    4. +4
      16 December 2015 09: 32
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      Match TV is untouchable
      . no, this tinochka is inviolable ... and you can’t call it on the site by its real name. recourse

      Why is this not allowed, let me curiosity?
    5. +20
      16 December 2015 10: 01
      From the above and the above, can I conclude? If I break Mrs. Kandelaki’s head, will there be nothing for me? I’m Russian, I’m self-defined as Russian, but I'm not there? Those. the object of the crime will be, but the subject is not. Well, I’m not there, a myth, a ghost. It is necessary to consult with the prosecutors, maybe they will give indulgence ... what laughing
      1. +1
        16 December 2015 10: 29
        Quote: Observer 33
        It is necessary to consult with the prosecutors, maybe they will give indulgence.

        tell me later ... wink
      2. +1
        16 December 2015 10: 53
        Man, take a chance! You have just expressed a desire in the media to commit a crime motivated by nationalism. So the Criminal Code article is already there and they can open a case, and if they open it, they’ll certainly condemn it!
        1. +3
          16 December 2015 14: 01
          Read carefully, I ask a question, without any intentions. There are no Russians, but the language still remains laughing
        2. +11
          17 December 2015 00: 20
          it is precisely because of all shitty tolerance, invented ethnic hatred (this is when the Russian speaks or does something not Russian, but if it is the other way around) the Russians are oppressed everywhere, and when they speak out in support of the Russians it is all cut out. There is a massive bulk of some incomprehensible instructions in schools about tolerance, constantly some sort of instructions on the prevention of ethnic hatred and other invented canoes, and moreover, they are all addressed specifically to RUSSIAN. At the moment, Russians, with most of them in Russia, are the most powerless.
    6. +17
      16 December 2015 10: 05
      The same animal as Ksyushad.
    7. 0
      16 December 2015 11: 24
      We have no untouchables! We have fellow travelers!
    8. 0
      16 December 2015 11: 55
      and you can’t name it on the site with a real name.
      Why not? Here: Tina Kandevaki, Pavlik Kandevakin, and others. In an Internet million of real names Tinatin ...
    9. +9
      16 December 2015 12: 56
      The roof “she has of course is powerful. Someone put her in this position? And now she is covering it. But Mikhalkov, he said everything right.
    10. +1
      17 December 2015 11: 23
      It is interesting who came up with this illiterate sheep to put on a sports channel. She is in sports like a pig in oranges, as can be seen from the broadcast grid of the channel. Another Smarodskaya.
    11. 0
      17 December 2015 23: 58
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      no, this tinochka is inviolable.

      Tina is a wedding general, assigned by someone to the leadership. Here she is not interesting, but those who gave her this feeder, and now protects. Someone "tall" enough to silence a completely different channel. Who is it? Incognito is clearly in power and with money. And why does our prosecutor's office receive salaries? What will not sound? Or can she not? Does the "high echelon" of this government hurt?
    12. +4
      18 December 2015 09: 40
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      Match TV is untouchable
      . no, this tinochka is inviolable ... and you can’t call it on the site by its real name. recourse

      why not??? let's say s ... u ... k ... a ..., Morse did not live in vain and went to the bathhouse, and the alphabet appeared .. two _ long ... and three short fellow laughing
    13. 0
      18 December 2015 17: 51
      everybody understands b ****
  2. -4
    16 December 2015 09: 14
    What is the article about and what does IT do on VO?
    Admins, why should you be ashamed of it, start a rubric, like on Rambler, "Social life" ...
    1. +2
      16 December 2015 09: 22
      Quote: Metallurg
      What is the article about and what does IT do on VO?
      Admins, why should you be ashamed of it, start a rubric, like on Rambler, "Social life" ...

      You are a plus. you can also add the headings "Sports", "Poster", "Auto", "Games". and we will discuss that the Spartak players are more interesting than the new Star Wars ... and who turned their faces off to whom in House-2 ...
      1. +9
        16 December 2015 09: 25
        Quote: RBLip
        Who to whom in the house-2 face twisted ...

        understandable with your addictions ... Yes
        1. +1
          16 December 2015 09: 29
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          understandable with your addictions ...

          laughing I know the name, the name of the channel, and what they fight there regularly ... but what does VO and match TV have to do with it?
          1. 0
            16 December 2015 10: 32
            Quote: RBLip
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            understandable with your addictions ...

            laughing I know the name, the name of the channel, and what they fight there regularly ... but what does VO and match TV have to do with it?

            Kandelaki - and there is no time to explain, look for yourself. See - "Kandelaki rebranding"! concern "kalashnikov" and so on.
          2. +1
            16 December 2015 11: 39
            but what does VO and match TV have to do with it ?,
            actually, and even very much. If you still do not understand that there is a war going on and the opponents are shown to us, then you need to think about it, where are you? or even what are you talking about?
        2. +19
          16 December 2015 09: 30
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Quote: RBLip
          Who to whom in the house-2 face twisted ...

          ... Yes
          1. +4
            16 December 2015 10: 04
            You are a fat plus, but with the Strategic Missile Forces bust, just napalm is enough
            1. +7
              16 December 2015 10: 28
              Quote: sisa29
              with the Strategic Missile Forces brute force, just enough napalm

              I would say that napalm is not enough.
              Then this place will have to be sprinkled with DTS-GK, fill the hill, enclose it with barbed wire and put up a sign "Animal burial ground" ...
              1. +2
                16 December 2015 11: 00
                Quote: podpolkovnik
                Then this place will have to be sprinkled with DTS-GK, fill the hill, enclose it with barbed wire and put up a sign "Animal burial ground" ...

                Here I respect Spetsov! Yes drinks
                1. +6
                  16 December 2015 11: 42
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  Quote: podpolkovnik
                  Then this place will have to be sprinkled with DTS-GK, fill the hill, enclose it with barbed wire and put up a sign "Animal burial ground" ...

                  Here I respect Spetsov! Yes drinks

                  Thank you!
                  hi drinks
            2. 0
              16 December 2015 12: 36
              What a cruel you. You can’t get napalm there. The forest will suffer and the animals will have nowhere to live. And how many innocent birds will die! We need something more humane. So that only Homo erectus is knocked out in this place.
              1. 0
                17 December 2015 12: 34
                Quote: Hedgehog
                We need something more humane.

                Soak in SF2U. After a night, the paint disappeared in a solution in NS pants. Will be all white and fluffy.
      2. +1
        16 December 2015 10: 03
        You are a plus. you can also add the headings "Sports", "Poster", "Auto", "Games". and we will discuss that the Spartak players are more interesting than the new Star Wars ... and who turned their faces off to whom in House-2 ...

        You can add ads for sales and services. And finally slide into yellowness ...
        What do Kandelaki and her "talkers" have to do with military issues? Or will there be a military sports review now?
        1. +5
          16 December 2015 10: 19
          Quote: Andrey NM
          You can add ads for sales and services. And finally slide into yellowness ...
          Here it is not necessary to juggle ...

          The article is correct. We need to discuss what is going on in the media, we need to know in person who is who - or are you against it ?! belay

          For example, I still did not really watch this TV channel ... and now I think I need to see what kind of faces there are and what they are broadcasting ... at least to explain to the youth what is what and who is who ...

          All the same, the youth will watch sports, but here on this sauce all the trouble will be pushed into the minds of the young ... what is this not in your house ?! belay

          shl
          Well, fairy tales about the fact that sport outside politics can or should be ... leave for yourself ...
        2. +9
          16 December 2015 10: 46
          Quote: Andrey NM
          Or will there be a military sports review?

          MATCH-TV sports channel. You can say sports and patriotic. In any case, it should be so. At least in Russia. Therefore, the military - patriotic education is directly related. And the discussion at VO is not a fall in yellowness, but an attempt to correct the situation in this direction. The fifth column doesn’t belong there at all, I don’t think there would be athletes among them.
          1. +8
            16 December 2015 13: 32
            Match TV is a purely commercial enterprise, there is no need to build illusions here. We have a lot to be, and even more to not. What channel Russia-2 did not suit? What was wrong there? Yes, it was just state-owned property, and now it has become the property of Gazprom-Media Holding OJSC. By the way, Mikhail Lesin, who was recently buried in Los Angeles, was the general director of this office. A number of channels are also transmitted there. Patriots, speak?
        3. 0
          17 December 2015 11: 05
          ..Military review unites patriotic, normal Russians, and when media shots such as "swamp-ooze-gonopol" appear, etc., a normal reaction of rejection follows ... and support from people who notice this ... "stench from the swamps"
      3. 0
        17 December 2015 19: 06
        The article is directed against Russophobia on TV. And is not the fight against Russophobia one of the tasks of a military man?
    2. +22
      16 December 2015 09: 23
      Quote: Metallurg
      Admins, why should you be ashamed of it, start a rubric, like on Rambler, "Social life" ...


      And let's better start a heading "For those who have never tasted." And we will place the indignant cries of marshals there, who only eat in the head.

      Bridgehead to demonstrate the lack of brains and accept condolences.

      I am sorry for you.
      1. -7
        16 December 2015 09: 26
        Start. Why are there to be shy.
        At the same time, and something else, such as "Sandbox", "Smishnye photos", "Dimators".
        I have no doubt that you will succeed.
    3. +8
      16 December 2015 09: 24
      Quote: Metallurg
      What is the article about and what does IT do on VO?
      Admins, why should you be ashamed of it, start a rubric, like on Rambler, "Social life" ...

      pralno! let's just post "URA-patriotic" articles so that the rose-colored glasses don't sweat ...
      1. +7
        16 December 2015 09: 32
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        let's only upload "URA-patriotic" articles


        Dear, yes and here Urapovskie articles?

        It's just that a category that doesn't want to think demonstrates its "cleverness". They need three lines. We read the first, then the last and to the comments. You can go directly to the comments, without reading.

        We have 2 / 3 marshals such. Gifted.

        You see, it’s not a hurry, but it’s not working like Pavlov’s dog. The key words "Obama", "Erdogan", "USA", "State Department", "Jews" were not given - and that was all. Breaking the pattern. Saliva is not excreted with bile.

        Hence the utter bewilderment.
        1. +1
          16 December 2015 11: 09
          Quote: Banshee
          We have 2 / 3 marshals such. Gifted.

          we have Roman, 2/3 "marshals" 2-3 months "exposure", but that's not the point, (to cancel the fucking title) I think that articles and topics. should be versatile, diverse and with different opinions. otherwise the very meaning the site will be lost, after all, we are here to express our point of view and attitude to certain facts-events, argue, give arguments, truth is always born in a dispute, this is the message of my thought, albeit in a sarcastic form. hi
      2. +5
        16 December 2015 09: 33
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        let's just post "Hurray-patriotic" articles so that the rose-colored glasses don't sweat ...

        noooooo. MUCH more interesting to see the physics of Kandelaki in some crap.
        PS and where does the pink glasses and cheers patriots?
      3. +2
        16 December 2015 09: 33
        I believe that after this, I’m banned here, or they’ll erase him, but I will express myself ...
        If you do not see that the site has begun to profess the principle Show must go on - this only speaks of your mind.
        Who cares about the statements of lyceum artists such as Makarevich and Kandelaki? Only the same wretched as they themselves. What do you land everyone to their level? Are they authorities for you? So then you are on the site of cosmopolitan and other liz and zozh.
        No, you are wiping out here and trying to pretend to be "ilitarian and exclusive" ...
        And sculpt in your comments nonsense. A kind of populism ... Not from Maidan rode?
        1. +3
          16 December 2015 09: 47
          Quote: Metallurg
          I believe that after this kammenta they will ban me here, or they will erase it


          A lot of honor. We for the stupidity is not yet banned.

          Quote: Metallurg
          So you ground everyone to their level?


          By no means. You planned it yourself.

          Quote: Metallurg
          No, you are wiping out here and trying to pretend to be "ilitarian and exclusive" ...


          I pretend? Yes, no, I show my opinion. And why are you so bombed with this?

          Quote: Metallurg
          And sculpt in your comments nonsense. A kind of populism ... Not from Maidan rode?


          Well, an insult is a normal thing.

          With Maidan? Well, yes, of course, I do not deny it (it would be stupid to burn like that). And even though I was there a bit longer, but only you consumed avid gulls.
        2. +8
          16 December 2015 09: 53
          Quote: Metallurg
          Who cares about the statements of lyceum artists such as Makarevich and Kandelaki?

          You know, Sergei, I used to be indignant about the clowns from Ukraine who are shown on all kinds of talk shows, and our liberals like Borka Wikipedia, they say why they show them and say about them? Then came, let it be shown, and as often as possible, so that the people had something to compare, because they, through their actions and speeches, drown themselves, passing from the stage of political prostitution, and becoming political corpses.
          A kind of vaccination, as on the Maidan of Ukraine.
          We must know our "heroes" by sight.
        3. +3
          16 December 2015 11: 02
          Quote: Metallurg
          And sculpt in your comments nonsense. A kind of populism ... Not from Maidan rode?

          I would advise you before you hang tags on everyone - watch the performance of V. Zhirinovsky in the State Duma yesterday 15.12.15/XNUMX/XNUMX and you would have clearly understood both the message of the article and Besogon Mikhalkov and who is right .. and this is far from a discussion of the secular life of Tina and a separate, excessively talkative journalist ..
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0bMeb1D6Qw
    4. +13
      16 December 2015 09: 37
      Quote: Metallurg
      What is the article about and what does IT do on VO?

      I hope that VO is a site with a patriotic bias, and the people here are patriots of their country. I think you agree with this ???? Yes or no?
      Further on. why the article was published, recently there was a survey from the site administration on this topic, everything is clear and on the shelves, look and find.
      Well and most importantly, why not be here in this article? The actions of our VKS in Syria, this is the war, the destruction of Turkey by our attack aircraft, this is the war, the actions of Turkey in the seas against the Russian Navy, this is a provocation, with the aim of inviting the Russian Federation to the war, And most importantly, these Kandelaki, Andronovs, and others, fifth a column located inside Russia, which plays on our field, but for someone else's team.
      That is, they are trying to ruin society from within.
      I’m wondering, our government will also react harshly to the actions of these AS, as well as to the events with Turkey, or let these PETRUSHKAM from Bazarnaya Square, spoil their heads ???
      1. +1
        16 December 2015 09: 47
        Something you reminded me of such an analogy ...
        Started a family of kitten. He took, and put on slippers. And then the family looks with emotion at the kitten and discusses ... like we feed him, and he spoils us in slippers, but he is still a cutie. And let's put his pictures on Twitter and VKontakte posting? And tell the neighbors how he spoils slippers ...

        If you got shit in your slippers, I suppose, either educate or use other methods. And to discuss prostitutes in the civil service on the site in - who and what of them said ... Why then not discuss some thread of the saleswoman "samachek" and her political views?
        And it turns out something "Vassisualy Lokhankin and the collapse of Russian liberalism."

        Do not make yourself an idol, as one of the commandments of the Lord seems to sound.
        And let’s do it, publicity ... Above the house, they scold two people, and you do the same yourself, but with other characters, in this case, Kandelaki.
        1. +2
          16 December 2015 10: 04
          Quote: Metallurg
          Why then not discuss some thread of the "semachek" saleswoman and her political views?

          laughing About the "semachki" this did make me laugh)))
          In fact, you are right!
          And the fact that you are taught as that kitten to know your angle and not be clever is this kind of "Obamki exceptional" who have found their niche in the VO and shine with their mind. There are many of them !!! )))
          1. +2
            16 December 2015 10: 33
            Quote: sssla
            And the fact that you are taught as that kitten to know your angle and not be clever is this kind of "Obamki exceptional" who have found their niche in the VO and shine with their mind. There are many of them !!! )))

            You do not write about this about yourself? I recall the case when you tried to teach and teach me a lesson. laughing
            1. +1
              16 December 2015 10: 38
              Quote: Sirocco
              You do not write about this about yourself? I recall the case when you tried to teach and teach me a lesson.

              And what are you clever much ?? About what, if not hard to recall ?? Maybe there was something and when. I do not deny. None of us are sinless, but this is an exception and not a rule!
              1. +1
                16 December 2015 11: 00
                Quote: sssla
                I do not deny. None of us are sinless, but this is an exception and not a rule!

                Stas, you yourself are stuck in our dialogue with Sergey, and now you ask who is smart about what. We are all here with our opinion, and no one is imposing it.
                I am also not sinless, I have my skeletons in the closet))))))))). You probably have no mood)))))
                1. 0
                  16 December 2015 16: 52
                  Quote: Sirocco
                  have their skeletons in the closet)))))))). You probably have no mood)))))

                  Probably!
                  Sorry if something is wrong!
    5. +3
      16 December 2015 09: 44
      Quote: Metallurg
      Admins, why should you be ashamed of it, start a rubric, like on Rambler, "Social life" ...

      Long overdue! laughing
      1. +2
        16 December 2015 09: 50
        "Two (s) Lavrov" is power! "

        Especially if it is a metallurgist with a bayonet! Screwed to scrap!

        Horror and fear!
        1. +2
          16 December 2015 10: 50
          It is better to be a metallurgist with a bayonet, even if screwed to a scrap, than to "hesitate with the general line" ...
          To hesitate, it is certainly more satisfying, but with a bayonet of self-esteem more.
  3. bad
    +11
    16 December 2015 09: 14
    kandelaki rat .. LDPR leader demands to dismiss Kandelaki because of insulting Russians »DNR24 - News of the DNR, Donetsk People's Republic
    http://dnr24.su/mirovoe-soobschestvo/11195-lider-ldpr-trebuet-uvolit-kandelaki-i
    z-za-oskorbleniya-russkih.html
    1. -2
      16 December 2015 09: 49
      Quote: bad
      kandelaki rat ..

      unconditionally. But pretty pretty. I remembered her interview with Ramzan and his awkward compliments.
      1. +3
        16 December 2015 11: 01
        Quote: Zeppelin ml.
        I remembered her interview with Ramzan and his awkward compliments.

        Her tongue is sharp, you can’t argue. I'm afraid to imagine where she trains him! wassat But a sharp tongue does not reflect its essence as a person, and such an act reflects the TRUE FACE.
  4. +3
    16 December 2015 09: 15
    The article is kind of messy. Specifically, who said what? It’s not a sports site here, people don’t follow Utkin Andronov’s statements so much, or there Kandelaki
    1. +17
      16 December 2015 09: 23
      So make sure that the government posts speak against the Russian world.

      Respect and respect to the author, the rest - you do not understand - sit on the perch point exactly, read the news about the victories in Syria and do not show your own feeble mind.
    2. +4
      16 December 2015 09: 42
      I will tell you more on a sports site (where people are interested in sports, and not tweeters of the "super stars of the Russian Olympus"), few people follow the statements of Utkin, Andronov, or even more so Kandelaki. These are snickering, pretentious selfish little people who do not care about both Russians and non-Russians alike.
      1. +2
        16 December 2015 09: 51
        Quote: Vinci
        This snickering pathos selfish little people who do not care and the Russian and non-Russian.


        And this is a reason for the Russian not to spit in them?
        1. +3
          16 December 2015 10: 36
          For this you can spit in the face of every third person on the street. I do not argue that the author is a fine fellow that he brings up this issue in the media, but he himself steps on the same rake, "pig farm". Pigs (and all derivatives from this word) is a dismissive, offensive nickname for Spartak fans who position themselves as a national team. And now Spartak fans (by the way, the most numerous in the country) grab onto bats and go around Moscow to look for the offenders of the people, indiscriminately. You need to be more careful in your statements and everyone.
      2. +5
        16 December 2015 11: 00
        Quote: Vinci
        on a sports site (where people are interested in sports, and not tweeters of "super stars of the Russian Olympus"), few people follow the statements of Utkin, Andronov, or even more so Kandelaki

        In fact of the matter. It is on sports sites that censorship of anti-Russian statements should be severe. No politics. Sport is out of politics. And if these statements are not listened to, then all the same, something remains from them, this is used by the fifth column, since the vast majority of the population watches sports programs.
    3. +4
      16 December 2015 10: 43
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      It’s not a sports site,

      But the article is not about sports.
      1. 0
        16 December 2015 15: 48
        Quote: ArMax
        But the article is not about sports.
        . The author would have to quote from the beginning of the quote, and then carry out the analysis. And so, in fact, like Utkin is stupid. Well, stupid and stupid, figs with him, he has nothing to do with military matters. Do many people Utkina read? - This is just a sports commentator. Let’s also discuss Malakhov, or there Polina Gagarina from Golos, they also appear on federal channels. I don’t follow every media person, for example, once, and it’s not interesting.
        1. +1
          16 December 2015 21: 27
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          The author would have to quote from the beginning of the quote, and then carry out the analysis.

          Probably, although the video with Mikhalkov quite reveals the topic.

          Quote: Stirbjorn
          I do not follow every media face

          I also do not follow and did not know about these characters or anything like that.
          But I think to know who is who around us is not in vain. Yes
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    16 December 2015 09: 21
    Why do we need squabbles in the medeo space, we will vote with a button, we don’t want to discuss their claims at all.
    1. +6
      16 December 2015 09: 33
      Quote: cniza
      Why do we squabble in medeo

      it is to the Kazakhs. Medeo with them.
  7. +5
    16 December 2015 09: 22
    We watched something like that on the plate this garbage Match TV, nothing special. Both looked and forgot. Therefore, it is not surprising that someone called them a pig farm.
    1. +5
      16 December 2015 09: 27
      Quote: Yarik
      We watched something like that on a plate this garbage Match TV, nothing special

      the remote control from the TV is a magic vesch! unnecessary junk is removed by pressing a button ... I did it on the second day. smile
    2. -1
      16 December 2015 09: 52
      Quote: Yarik
      We watched something like that on a plate this garbage Match TV

      Match TV is the Russian federal public channel about sports and a healthy lifestyle. On the air - broadcasts of major sporting events, news, analytical and entertainment programs, reality and talk shows, documentaries, shows about a healthy lifestyle, feature films and television series about sports.
      If this is garbage for you - smoke the grass! request
      1. +1
        16 December 2015 10: 13
        Quote: Bayonet
        If this is garbage for you - smoke the grass!

        Well, by and large, watching sports TV can be combined with a jamb. Under Bob Marley. laughing In sports bars, beer bellies stare at the screen and eat burgers, without becoming more athletic at the same time)))
        1. 0
          16 December 2015 12: 06
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          In sports bars, beer bellies stare at the screen and eat burgers, without becoming more athletic at the same time)))

          There is such a thing! laughing
  8. +3
    16 December 2015 09: 22
    Mikhalkov, as befits a conformist, again straddled a wave of popular anger. I respect the director’s work (except for Burnt by the Sun), but his views, like that weather vane, turn to where the wind blows ...
    And according to the Match - time will tell ... There will still be many things that will come up, it seems ... He’s also a serpentarium
    1. +10
      16 December 2015 09: 33
      Well...
      Okay, everyone has their own opinion. For example, I don't like Mikhalkov as a director. But for "Besogon" you can forgive a lot.

      Argued, logical, imposing, calm.
      1. +3
        16 December 2015 10: 01
        Quote: Banshee
        But for "Besogon" you can forgive a lot.

        I support the novel.
        It’s not always possible, but I try to watch its releases.
        Raises serious and sometimes very serious and at first, inexperienced, glance irrelevant questions and problems, as you rightly noted, for those who not only eat in the head.
        And not only raises them, but very calmly, reasonably and very informationally, diversifies them and expands them.
        Regarding the article of the East wind, the author +.
      2. 0
        16 December 2015 15: 32
        And for the theft of budget money, too, forgive ??? he only on "Stalingrad" is not less than 1 million laundered. Not to mention other topics: royalties, etc. ..... He should not talk about morality !!! Pe .... he is in life, as well as a zhirik ((((aggressive f ... st !!! and there are darkness in power now.
    2. -6
      16 December 2015 10: 03
      Quote: Llyric
      Mikhalkov, as befits a conformist, again straddled a wave of popular anger.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. EFA
    +12
    16 December 2015 09: 25
    Mikhalkov said everything in the video on the case, watched this issue yesterday, the author of course crumpled everything, the article did not have enough structure, and in general the topic is not new, Russophobes and liberalists, as usual, are trying to darn us with any available means.
  11. +13
    16 December 2015 09: 25
    In my opinion, today in large cities of Russia, in particular in Moscow especially, a difficult consumer nation is emerging, but a kind of imitation of the American nation brand. At the forefront of this mainstream is Kandelaki. But for Russia, it is not new to be an imitating society and even sometimes surpass the object of desire. We even started waging wars in the style of the Americans - with axes (calibers) and in real time. Another thing is why these individuals do not want to build their own separate technocratic civilization, from the Cyrillic alphabet to their car? By the way, our "friends" often like to catch us on this, when they try to reproach capitalist Russia for using the Western benefits of civilization and even the Internet, forgetting that we have not been a Scoop for a long time, and we are not trying to produce all services and all gradations, nomenclature goods as opposed to the collective West, and borders have long been open and production is connected, from titanium blanks for Boeing, to raising American asses on the ISS, which was built using our proven technology at the Mir station. In short, this is how it will continue until we ourselves answer - are we building our own project? Or we remain consumers, where we photograph ourselves in the elevator, as once upon a time a 5-year-old child chewing gum in 1992, imagined himself as an American Macaulay Kalkin, with his exclamation - Wow !!!, instead of Uraaa !!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      16 December 2015 09: 38
      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      We even started wars in the style of Americans - with axes (caliber) and in real time.


      And what's wrong with that?

      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      whether we build our project, or remain consumers


      Here, unfortunately, everything is worse. There are individuals who wish to build. Each group - to the extent of its depravity. To whom "Russia-Tseevropa", to whom "Zapadnashevse", to whom "Great Russia from the Ocean".

      Who has enough brains and money.

      But the main problem is that 90% is sitting on the fifth point exactly, and they are waiting for the constructed one to be used.

      So we are building our project, but the majority of them are Western-style consumers.
      1. +5
        16 December 2015 09: 45
        We even started wars in the style of Americans - with axes (caliber) and in real time.
        It’s necessary to adopt without constraint, tactics evolving in tune with modernity, we didn’t have such experience, it’s not a shame to learn even from an opponent. Remember the Caucasian campaigns, and 08 was a year, better?
        1. +2
          16 December 2015 09: 48
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          We even started wars in the style of Americans - with axes (caliber) and in real time.
          It’s necessary to adopt without constraint, tactics evolving in tune with modernity, we didn’t have such experience, it’s not a shame to learn even from an opponent. Remember the Caucasian campaigns, and 08 was a year, better?


          Yes, I'm not so much about tactics, but how much about the picture and the filing of information wink
          1. +5
            16 December 2015 10: 36
            Quote: Nevsky_ZU
            Yes, I’m not so much about tactics, but how much about the picture

            about this or something ... laughing
            1. +1
              16 December 2015 18: 16
              and he asked me if I’m on Twitter,
              and I'm standing with a fashionable piercing in the clitoris ...
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 0
              18 December 2015 08: 31
              Yes, someone finished, right on the face of this person
            4. +4
              18 December 2015 22: 38
              from fear finished? belay
    3. The comment was deleted.
  12. +6
    16 December 2015 09: 30
    why didn’t you like the article? the topic of the article is not related to sports, pure politics, 5th column, etc.
    And there is nothing chaotic, chaotic Vasily Utkin commented on the match "Bayer" - "Barcelona"
  13. +6
    16 December 2015 09: 33
    I don’t understand that Mikhalkov, Pushkov got excited? They themselves are anti-Soviet, and the anti-Soviet is always Russophobe. What they have sown, let them reap. It turns out funny, two anti-advisers scolding Russophobe. Personally, I have nothing to be surprised at. Our anti-Sovietism comes from the very top.
    1. +2
      16 December 2015 10: 08
      Quote: Mareman Vasilich
      I don’t understand that Mikhalkov, Pushkov got excited? They themselves are anti-Soviet,

      Anti-Sovietism is a system of views directed against the Soviet regime.
      Since the Soviet regime has long been gone, what kind of anti-Soviet can be? winked It's time to change the labels smile
      1. +5
        16 December 2015 14: 46
        wink The anti-Soviet is always Russophobe. The Soviet era is our history, the Soviet government is one with the Soviet era, to hate the Soviet era means to hate your history. What's not clear?
  14. -6
    16 December 2015 09: 34
    This article is similar to the one about Dima Bilan, where he is filming there. Let’s an article about Volochkova or Malinovskaya, otherwise all politics and weapons, in a word nightmare and horror.
    1. -1
      16 December 2015 09: 47
      Quote: zekaze1980
      This article is similar to the one about Dima Bilan, where he is filming there. Let’s an article about Volochkova or Malinovskaya, otherwise all politics and weapons, in a word nightmare and horror.

      so many "secular" experts, what are you doing on THIS site? Have you gone to wave your charter? wassat and laziness to use brains? have you thought about what topic for reflection we were given? or do not know what Kandelaki is doing besides this "match"? on what does he cut millions, and at whose expense? Does the "rebranding" for millions of royalties (including those of defense enterprises) mean anything to you? well, find out, it's interesting ...
  15. +1
    16 December 2015 09: 36
    It is not easy to take care of raising your child every minute. It's easier to turn on his "distraction" (TV, computer, set-top box, etc.). This is how generations of consumers of ready-made information grow up. And who will always be found to cook. Throw out all the "distractions" from the house. Spend time with your child, doing useful and developing activities. Or captivate him with something interesting to him. The problem will die out by itself.
  16. -2
    16 December 2015 09: 37
    I don’t understand, TV match is a project that was made for the people. Or do you want to watch all the major sporting events again on paid channels? And the fact that he is being promoted with the help of such personalities is nothing terrible; half of our advertisers consist of the same animals! And under candelak, I'm sure just dough will give more
  17. +6
    16 December 2015 09: 42
    But four years ago, this chicken (I'm about Kandelaki) threw herself into the chair of the Minister of Education. The current tricks of the Ministry of Education would seem like flowers.
  18. +2
    16 December 2015 09: 44
    Not a minute watched the channel. Deleted as soon as it appeared in the channel list. Well, all the same, the first impression almost always coincides with the real essence of people.
    1. +3
      16 December 2015 11: 09
      Quote: kit-kat
      Not a minute watched the channel

      And skiing, biathlon where to look? Guberniev, though he doesn’t allow himself this, is purely a sport.
      1. 0
        16 December 2015 11: 40
        There are other sports channels.
    2. 0
      16 December 2015 11: 21
      Quote: kit-kat
      Not a minute watched the channel. Deleted as soon as it appeared in the channel list. Well, all the same, the first impression almost always coincides with the real essence of people.

      I don’t give a damn about the channel’s activists, I watch sporting events on it and turn off the sound so that I don’t listen to those gundos.
      1. +1
        16 December 2015 11: 39
        The earnings of these figures also depend on the rating of the channel.
  19. 3vs
    +1
    16 December 2015 09: 47
    Give Mikhalkov to Channel One!
  20. 0
    16 December 2015 09: 48
    Quote: Banshee
    Mistress of a pig farm. Ober-cowgirl, so to speak.

    Why immediately the mistress? Just a pigman :-)
  21. +7
    16 December 2015 09: 50
    these pigs dared to talk in such a tone about the Russian world. To drive nafig out of the country. They got too fooled, sensed a weakling. To forbid to engage in social activities. Sweet tweeters and instagrams are bloody.

    Tina Kandelaki (arrived from Georgia): “Why do you always talk about Russia as a Russian country? Russian, no you! This is a long, long proven fact that the Russian ethnic group does not consist of Russians! ”

    Pushkov recalled that the concept of “Russian World” is spelled out in the concept of Russia's foreign policy, and therefore cannot be considered abstract. He emphasized that the words of Match TV journalist Aleksey Andronov were published during the days of the Compatriots Forum, where President Vladimir Putin spoke out in defense of the Russian world. In addition, Pushkov said he did not understand how a football commentator, allowing insults against compatriots, works on a channel that was organized with state support and financed at his expense.

    Former professional athlete and State Duma deputy Nikolai Valuev supported the point of view of Pushkov. “Friends and acquaintances thank Alexey Pushkov for today's broadcast. I support him. Andronov should be responsible for the words, ”Valuev wrote in his microblog Twitter.
    “At a forum of compatriots, Putin and Lavrov defended the Russian world. Today, the host of the MatchTV channel publicly insulted this world and its “amateurs,” wrote the head of the Duma’s committee on international affairs.

    On the morning of November 6, Match TV football commentator Alexei Andronov reacted harshly to social media criticism of his address. Andronov called the angry users “evil spirits and abomination”, advising “eat your own in another place”.
    1. +2
      16 December 2015 11: 32
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      these pigs dare to reason

      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      . Drive nafig from the country

      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      To ban

      Hmm .... it smelled of something familiar ...
      1. 0
        16 December 2015 11: 40
        Quote: Bayonet
        Hmm .... it smelled of something familiar ...

        Shoot, burn and dispel the ashes. wassat
      2. +1
        17 December 2015 08: 43
        IT CELEBRED, I would say ... first they’ll remove them from the screens, then they will burn books, then the camps .... and there not far to shootings. And all this for a different point of view. And this is a ghoul, Mikhalkov, with a non-traditional orientation, who ???? Gapon, he, pop, that's who !!! caressed by the Soviet regime, changed his shoes quickly and in favor with the current ... such licking will not disappear anywhere ..
  22. +2
    16 December 2015 09: 51
    I, personally, cannot say anything about Kandelaki. But Mr. Andronov, with his manner of commenting, got it out decently, and what Mikhalkov voiced, for me, became just proof of the insanity of this subject. The fans will understand me - there is a European Cup match and Andronov comments, so at least turn the sound off! Moans about our "football imperfection" in comparison with the European celestials ... endless comparisons of our players with their Western standards for imitation. Sometimes it just seems to me that our players do not watch football, otherwise they would stupidly clean up this pig's face, and smear a bad forehead for Russophobic ... er with green stuff.
  23. 0
    16 December 2015 09: 51
    The "pig farm" made a depressing impression. A very accurate name.
  24. +3
    16 December 2015 09: 52
    I waited two days for this article here and fellow Thank you very much to the author, I watched this program with Mikhalkov, and censorship crawled out on our channels Russia 24 where they were banned and the TVC — where they cut a piece with Pushkov
  25. +1
    16 December 2015 09: 52
    Kandelaki designed the "cntl_c - cntrl_v" logo for, it seems, 10 lemons or more, and everyone is silent, including Soloviev. He also wishes her good luck. After all, Kandelaki is not a pensioner who called on the radio on the air in the morning and annoys the presenter who has not slept enough after the live broadcast at night with his questions and who can be rude and call names, but a potential employer.
    1. +2
      16 December 2015 10: 06
      Quote: imugn
      Kandelaki designed the "cntl_c - cntrl_v" logo for, it seems, 10 lemons or more

      more. It was about 15 million.
      I liked how someone Tina Bolotnaya called her after the corresponding areal events)
  26. +6
    16 December 2015 09: 52
    By the way, in the words of T. Shaov about these "divas":
    "Look, the whole country is in darkness,
    And who is lighting this darkness for us?
    And brunette Tina Kandelaki,
    And blonde Ksenia Sobchak "
  27. +6
    16 December 2015 09: 57
    All these slimes of bilans and others acting on, basically, young, unformed minds are "soldiers" in the service of the enemy and are fighting our people by the method of moral decay and weaning from the ability to comprehend. Therefore, this article is relevant and can be put on a par with the mentions of weapons and tactics of the armies and intelligence services of neighboring countries.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  28. +3
    16 December 2015 10: 02
    TV is a shout that has long turned into a viper. Who orders it pays. That’s the result. Leberasts hide behind tolerance and freedom of speech, but all the nasty things in one direction. The whole essence of the article was in Andronov and his speech. Rusofob, but for money . Tomorrow will become anti-Semite, the main salary and travel.
  29. -9
    16 December 2015 10: 05
    Pluralism of opinions and views is still urgently needed, at least for the qualitative development of society on a competitive basis. Otherwise, we will become a semblance of a Euro-Ukraine with a total dictatorship or other pseudo-democratic Western countries. But if it comes to insults and other unlawful acts, then the reaction of the relevant law enforcement agencies should follow. With regards to the program itself, when I watched it, I personally did not notice any political subtext. I myself categorically do not share the opinions and views of some employees of this television channel, condemning them, but nonetheless accepting their right to do so.
    1. +5
      16 December 2015 12: 55
      Pluralism of opinions should be, I agree. But Russophobia is not pluralism of opinions - it is Russophobia. And if a sports pig with a TV match can express his opinion, then why Mikhalkov cannot express his opinion about him? ..
      1. 0
        17 December 2015 09: 59
        Maybe from something not, just like us, here is the Internet, please speak up to your heart's content. Why his Mikhalkov "Besagon" was not shown, well, it is very strange that VGTRK took such a position. In general, the policy of our channels is very strange, the whole year the media scolded the Ukrainians for presenting information one-sidedly, and today, when there are protests of long-distance raiders against Platon and motorists against paid parking, they took one side and do not cover the position of the opposite side. Although they say that they are the most objective media on the planet. Yes, the situation with Mikhalkov is very strange, and it pulls some kind of liberal odor, I began to notice this even when very strange programs of a certain Svanidze began to be shown on the central channel.
    2. 0
      18 December 2015 17: 52
      You are just like Yaytsenyukh with a bouquet. Guess why?
  30. +4
    16 December 2015 10: 05
    match-tv is not a channel at all; it is a mockery. There was a wonderful channel Russia2 with a sports bias. I love sports, but not a fan. Fans watch all kinds of NTV sport or Sport 1. Neither amateurs nor fans watch the TV match. Why? Because for a good TV you need a good team and talent, this is nothing, since the all-Russian sports channel was supposed to appear on the order of the GDP - look at health.
    1. 0
      18 December 2015 23: 09
      As a professional who works closely with bookmakers (I don’t play, of course), I’ll say this: people don’t care about a TV match or Russia 2 - if the broadcast and the "picture" are good, and the commentators are not blatant nonsense (which has never been seen on a TV match was not) then there is no fundamental role. As for the politics for the match, when broadcasting the draw for the Champions League and Europa League, commentators regarding the reason for the divorce of Russian and Ukrainian teams said: for obvious reasons ... this is a classic of the genre - no politics ...
  31. +3
    16 December 2015 10: 08
    Andronova and Kandilaki deprive citizenship of the Russian Federation !!! Herring them in the face. am :
    1. +4
      16 December 2015 11: 28
      It is time for deputies to pass a law, therefore
    2. 0
      16 December 2015 15: 12
      Quote: Winter cherry
      Herring them in the face.

      Better face in the herring!
  32. +4
    16 December 2015 10: 09
    Quote: Metallurg
    What is the article about and what does IT do on VO?
    Admins, why should you be ashamed of it, start a rubric, like on Rambler, "Social life" ...


    At the end of the program there is a story about Russian soldiers, look do not be lazy, which is probably why it has the right to be published here.
  33. +2
    16 December 2015 10: 10
    And what is this channel ??? I’m a worn-out zomborussian German laughing except Russia 24 I look only Russia 1
    tongue laughing
  34. Stepan stepanovich
    +8
    16 December 2015 10: 39
    “A nation that does not have a national identity is manure on which other nations grow.” © Petr Arkadyevich Stolypin
    1. 0
      18 December 2015 17: 51
      Allow to add. F. Dostoevsky: Russian people without the Orthodox faith are rubbish.
  35. 0
    16 December 2015 10: 40
    I did not look and I will not watch!
  36. +4
    16 December 2015 11: 02
    Thanks to the author for the note. Brief and chaotic, but generally understandable.
  37. +6
    16 December 2015 11: 03
    I respect Nikita Sergeevich and his transfer, I respect Pushkov, but there is still a small "worm of doubt"! Correctly and justly, he called by his own names this virtually "white tape" rabble, entrenched in our media, but why not a word about the true "puppeteers", after all, these "scribblers" are not so brave to bear this on their own! I would like to remind everyone this "Russified" type of Kandelaki about who gave them the opportunity to rise so high in our Russian society, which they successfully "bite"! Well, I don't like the "Russian World" the road to Tbilisi and other places of the "historical homeland" is free, you can, like Govnopolsky, blame our borders and shit in the corners. No, they are well "fed" here, and besides, something seems to fall from our not quite "partners" in the form of grants (and it is correct to call the thirty pieces of silver Judas). It's time, it's time to seriously deal with the Russian media and "clean up" these "Augean stables" a little, especially since we have enough Hercules (although they are called somewhat differently)!
    1. 0
      17 December 2015 20: 30
      And what is the "worm of doubt"?
  38. +8
    16 December 2015 11: 09
    It's time to call what is happening by their own names.
    In Russia, hiding behind this name, there is a certain community (guess three times what nation is in it!), Which aims to build a non-Russian world.
    All funds were used. Including big money, administrative resources. From there the shocking laws of the Federal Migration Service, from there corruption, nasty stuffing in the media and the "exceptional" features of their "creative" work to discredit the Russian World (including creating conditions for all kinds of misfortunes and their endless savoring in the media).
    This is a war of annihilation. As before there was a slogan "Not an inch back!", So now there should be a slogan: "Not to yield a single millimeter of the Russian World!" - in all directions and in all areas. And do not give up until there is victory even in the smallest defense of this world.
    Because there is no longer a brighter and more reliable refuge in the world for all people who stand on the side of Good.
  39. +2
    16 December 2015 11: 10
    You just need to kick this g ... oh from the TV !!!! ... just something to do !!!! Next ---- you need to clean, clean and clean the ranks of TVishnikov. So there is so much shit --- seen with the naked eye. This must be removed .....
    1. 0
      18 December 2015 23: 10
      and how then will you differ from the Right Sector? Ideology? With the same methods? Bravo...
  40. +2
    16 December 2015 11: 38
    Russia2, as a sport was, to put it mildly, not so hot, but MatchTV, in general, in no way ... there was a public sports channel and probably will not wait any longer.
  41. +4
    16 December 2015 11: 44
    I wonder what kind of world there is?
    Well, let's say you deny the Russian world in a boorish manner, what's next ?!
    What do you believe in? What world is there for you?
    I think the question is just in faith. This is what Mikhalkov says. Do you believe in demons, but respect the faith of others!
  42. 0
    16 December 2015 11: 53
    Quote: Banshee
    Quote: Metallurg
    I believe that after this kammenta they will ban me here, or they will erase it


    A lot of honor. We for the stupidity is not yet banned.

    Quote: Metallurg
    So you ground everyone to their level?


    By no means. You planned it yourself.

    Quote: Metallurg
    No, you are wrecking here, and trying to pretend to & iauot; ilitarnost and exclusivity & iauot; ...


    I pretend? Yes, no, I show my opinion. And why are you so bombed with this?

    Quote: Metallurg
    And sculpt in your comments nonsense. A kind of populism ... Not from Maidan rode?


    Well, an insult is a normal thing.

    With Maidan? Well, yes, of course, I do not deny it (it would be stupid to burn like that). And even though I was there a bit longer, but only you consumed avid gulls.

    You! And for less, banyat !!!
  43. +1
    16 December 2015 12: 31
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    In my opinion, today in large cities of Russia, in particular in Moscow especially, a difficult consumer nation is emerging, but a kind of imitation of the American nation brand. At the forefront of this mainstream is Kandelaki. But for Russia, it is not new to be an imitating society and even sometimes surpass the object of desire. We even started waging wars in the style of the Americans - with axes (calibers) and in real time.

    And what kind of nation is this, consumer? Is it who consumes or purchases goods, products and services? Well then, this is practically all the nations of the world, with the exception of some wild tribes, if someone doesn’t like something, you can easily find a way out for yourself, just turn off the Internet! but before you do this you need to use it to find the habitat of these tribes and then you can permanently delete yourself from the nation of consumption.
    By the way, at the expense of the warriors in the "American" style, in my opinion here we left them far behind, either in terms of the effectiveness of the strikes themselves, or in the propaganda support of the entire military company, breaking into small pieces the dirty lies of our Western partners, minimizing the very possibility of sneaky provocative falsifications!
    1. -1
      16 December 2015 21: 49
      Is Obama's mom in the photo? laughing
  44. -1
    16 December 2015 12: 36
    We are witnessing the birth of a new "Sore Echo".
  45. 0
    16 December 2015 13: 09
    [quote = Llyrik] but his looks like that weather vane - turn to where the wind blows ...
    Let me fix it: the weather vane shows WHERE the wind blows, i.e. where the smell comes from. And in this Mikhalkov is absolutely right.


    [quote = holgert] must be cleaned, cleaned and cleaned the ranks of TVishnikov.
    In Pozner’s program, Rogozin could hardly restrain himself from sending the provocateur to hell ...
  46. +2
    16 December 2015 13: 10
    There are a lot of such kondelaki on our TV. They just open their mouths, executing someone’s commands
  47. -5
    16 December 2015 13: 31
    We found someone to listen to - the master N. S. Mikhalkov. Kandelaki, of course, is a fool, but look at "Citadel" where he poured a wagon full of shit on Russia and received an order for this. And before Mikhalkov's immunity, Tina was like cancer before China
    1. -5
      16 December 2015 13: 50
      Mikhalkov as a director died with the Soviet Union
      1. +2
        17 December 2015 23: 23
        I’m watching at least five people liked the movie The Citadel
        1. +1
          18 December 2015 13: 04
          Especially for them, the "Master of Russian Cinematography" will soon release the second part of the "excellent film about teenage relationships" with the title "12+"
      2. -1
        18 December 2015 17: 49
        And then Mikhalkov?
  48. +4
    16 December 2015 13: 58
    All these channels, as explained to me, are an integral part of the holding. But the policy of the holding and who controls it ..... and there is a guarantee of the integrity of some journalists.
  49. +4
    16 December 2015 14: 05
    Yes, this is a fall in morals that every shelloon climbed onto the ruins of the USSR (Russian) culture, the level leading to Ozerov as a cancer to China, and their statements are not only dumb and illiterate, as traffic jams still behave haughty constantly, and that's all for public resources ...
  50. +7
    16 December 2015 19: 11
    But there was once before this Match-TV, the normal patriotic channel Russia-2
  51. +1
    16 December 2015 22: 04
    This is not Match-TV, this is scum-TV, and respect to Nikita Sergeich
  52. 0
    16 December 2015 23: 15
    The trio, of course, turned out to be enchanting. What are these two fat basses, what is this Shamakhan (Georgian) girl.
  53. +5
    16 December 2015 23: 24
    Everything here is a little more complicated than it might seem at first glance, although we (including me) do not know much. But the facts are as follows: in July of this year. By decree of the President, a new sports channel Match TV was created on the basis of the sports editorial office of VGTRK (and the Russia 2 TV channel in the first place). Russia 2 was one of the top ten publicly available federal channels, and was mandatory for display by all television broadcast network operators of any distribution medium (cable, satellite, IP television broadcasting...). The match replaced it, and automatically took the place of Russia 2 in all networks. Moreover, starting next year, several more versions of Match will begin broadcasting (Match 1, Match 2, Match Our Sport, ...), which, in turn, are created on the basis of other sports channels, including Sport 1, Fighter. KHL TV will also become part of the holding. It would seem that there is nothing bad here, well, someone might experience inconvenience, another channel will appear instead of their favorite one, but in the end, it is also sports... But think about who the target audience of these channels is. And it’s not for nothing that sports channels are among the most expensive for subscribers; they were watched, watched, and will continue to be watched. Golden Shower is broadcast in few places (and there is only one holding company!), and sports fans (almost all of them) will unwittingly become spectators of a huge broadcast octopus, almost a monopolist, no, sports will of course be shown, even a lot. But various talk shows and programs on “sports-related topics” will appear, they will gradually reorganize, divide, merge, add one more, or even a couple of their own channels to the “federal” ones... by the way, the Match has an exorbitant appetite for showing on networks cable television MUST have at least four channels of the holding, they don’t sell one at a time, buy in bulk, and without sports, the viewer is now demanding... Maybe, of course, not everything is so gloomy and many may think that I am promoting some kind of conspiracy theory, but To me (and from a professional point of view) this situation seems something like this... request
  54. +3
    17 December 2015 06: 10
    I gave the article a minus. I explain ( All this is of course just my personal opinion):

    With all due respect to the site administration, such “articles” should be preceded by the subtitle - “On the basis of advertising.”

    Now to the point of the article:
    1. What we have? As a result of the struggle for the “TV button,” the losing side tried, if not to strike back, then at least to spoil the image of the competitor. To do this, I tried to play the “patriotic” card, using “Mr.” Andronov’s statement about the personnel policy of the current owners of the channel, in a form offensive to many.
    RE. I personally understand the statement “Patriotism is the last refuge for scoundrels” to mean that scoundrels resort to “patriotic (actually pseudo-patriotic) rhetoric” to cover up their selfish goals.
    I don’t mean the author of the article, but the true organizers of the “wave” in the media.

    2. Instead of assessing Andronov’s professional qualities as a television commentator, they began to discuss his political views expressed by him as private opinion, on personal page on the social network.
    Yes, he offended many, very many. But instead of "destroying the enemy" ideologically we are called upon to simply open a “witch hunt.”
    RE. I repeat once again, Mr. Andronov expressed his views on a social network page, and not from the screen of a “federal” TV channel. Yes he is the enemy, and the enemy does not go into battle “with an open visor,” but by chance, through thoughtlessness, reveals his true face.
    Have we banned freedom of speech, introduced a “ban on a profession (lustration), for political views?
    Yes, he expressed them in the “public space”, and where to express them - in the “kitchen” or something.
    Yes, according to the “new Russian legislation,” an Internet page that has received 3000 views is subject to mandatory registration as a media outlet (so if a photo of your “cat” posted on your personal page on a social network gets that many views in a day, then don’t be surprised that “ questions may arise."
  55. +2
    17 December 2015 06: 11
    3. Instead of discussing the professionalism of the TV channel’s “team,” the “arrows are switched” to discussing appearance ( > ) and personal life ( "when the general producer is more busy with his figure and its inevitable demonstration for the general public" or "photo in the elevator, thanks for not being in the toilet" ).
    RE. What is this about? Like, how do people with such an “unathletic” appearance dare to talk “about sports”? Do you know, the great sports commentator Nikolai Ozerov, in his declining years, also had a far from “athletic” figure. And in terms of the number of joint photographs with people who are truly outstanding in various fields of activity, he will give Kandelaki a huge “head start”.
    And then there’s the opposite “pearl” about “demonstrating the figure to the general public.” What is this about? About the fact that a “woman” with such a figure cannot have brains “by definition”? “And in general, what can a woman understand about sports”?! Well, tell this to Anna Dmitrieva or Ekaterina Malovichko.

    PS. According to information from Wiki, sports commentator Anna Dmitrieva is also an employee of Match TV, but she seems not to have been noticed in expressing open “Russophobic views”. So maybe Mr. Andronov simply voiced his “wants”, or simply decided to “dirty everyone in the shit”? Otherwise, their rotten souls usually don’t allow such characters to “be in the shit in splendid isolation,” so they “smear” everyone.

    PPS. Despite the official ban on censorship, over the past year it has rapidly burst into our lives. This is also political - a ban on so-called “patriotic” sites by recognizing them as “extremist” (see the survey “Where did the USSR flag disappear” on the site). This is also a kind of “economic” censorship, under which the discussed issue of “Besogon” also fell. “Well, purely specifically, the boys asked not to spoil their business reputation.”
    And as they say - "Raven-raven..." wink

    And this option of removing the Besogon program from the air is also possible. Have you ever wondered why all this so-called “liberal opposition” is so stubbornly “promoted” in the media, why these “fat trolls” are still at large? Yes, they are simply “fattened like sacrificial rams.” When the “powers that be” really “smell like something is cooking,” they will be blamed for all the “troubles.”

    And once again the archers went with clouds of runaway slaves to the Kremlin, nailing on a spear a petition for the extradition of all the boyars for trial and execution. Sophia went out onto the Red Porch, white with anger: “They are lying about us, and in the thoughts of that militia there was no sign, I kiss the cross on that,” she shouted, tearing off her sparkling diamond pectoral cross, “then Matveyka the Tsarevich is lying about us.” And from the porch they threw only one seedy Tatar prince, Matveyka, onto the Streltsy spears: “Choke!”
    Matveyka was torn into small pieces, filled with rage, and again the archers left with nothing...
    /A.N. Tolstoy."Peter the First"/
    .

    And Mikhalkov and Pushkov were “disqualified for a false start.”
  56. +1
    17 December 2015 07: 03
    some kind of storm in a glass, from the series “Chatsky has gone crazy.”
  57. +2
    17 December 2015 08: 41
    Considering the relationship between GDP and NSM (he was at NSM’s anniversary), I wonder who then “protects” Strekotalka Tina and Co. and, to please them, films Mikhalkov’s TV show?
  58. +1
    17 December 2015 09: 13
    To be honest, I didn’t understand what was written in the article, probably the author is more informed, he at least cited the statements about which he writes, I watch football and read the sports press, but I didn’t catch up with what the author means. If we talk about the Match TV channel, it differs little from other TV projects, with the exception of a few.
  59. cap
    +1
    17 December 2015 09: 56
    The question, as I understand it, revolves around two concepts.
    Personality and rudeness.Who Ham is and what he did is known from the Bible.
    Everyone, or almost everyone, recognizes T. Kandelaki as a boor, and I am among them.
    The question is how biblical truths are embodied in our lives, including the media, and why such an odious figure was offered to society for public money.
    The question here is what is more important: an ambiguous rating or biblical ideas about decency. This is a question for Kandelaki’s “curators”.
    I am for the second option - the biblical one hi
  60. 0
    17 December 2015 10: 44
    Almost all the media (SMD) are in one way or another in the hands of the Jews (or under their influence), who make up the majority in the 5th column. And through them the Westerners rule the show. These are obvious things!
    And it is not surprising that all sorts of insignificant scum spew out stinking feces from their havalnik towards Rus'-RUSSIA!
    I hope there is someone in Maskva who will shut up these scum from journalism.

    As for Mikhalkov, he is a typical opportunist-weathervane, but in this case his nod is to the point.
    1. 0
      17 December 2015 13: 55
      As for Mikhalkov, he is a typical opportunist-weather vane, but in this case his nod is to the point.

      He is, of course, an opportunistic weathervane, but there is some consistency in his actions. Did you notice what newsreel footage he used to illustrate the “Congress of Russian Communities”? For him, the “Russian world” is not millions of ordinary Russian people abandoned to their fate in the “former Soviet republics.” No, for him the “Russian world” is only the descendants of emigrants of the early 20th century. Moreover, only “white bone, blue blood” to which he is trying so hard to cling to (well, he is all “a giant of thought, the father of Russian democracy and a person close to the sovereign-emperor”). No wonder the nickname stuck to him - “Master”.
      1. 0
        17 December 2015 14: 21
        I will add:
        He persistently pursues this line in his “film masterpieces.”
  61. 0
    17 December 2015 11: 15
    Nevertheless, it is the third button on the DH. Special services where are you? Why do I pay taxes?
  62. 0
    17 December 2015 11: 26
    How many scum have found refuge on Russian TV channels?! How can you promote Russophobia on a state channel?! Drive away such channel management with a broom!!!
    1. 0
      17 December 2015 13: 26
      You probably didn't quite understand the essence of what was happening. It is not the TV channel that promotes Russophobia, it is part of its “team” that adheres to Russophobic positions.
      And about “drive with a broom” - in "country 404" do the same thing, only with the opposite sign. And having expelled all those about whom Mr. Andronov wrote so insultingly on his Twitter, they are already Russophobic on television.
  63. 0
    17 December 2015 11: 38
    Five stages of decomposition:
    1) live at the expense of the Russian world
    2) they begin to parasitize the Russian world
    3) they begin to deny the Russian world
    4) the Russian world is tearing them down
    5) they begin to howl about “repressions” against them by the Russian world
  64. +2
    17 December 2015 13: 20
    What does sports or TV have to do with it? The article discusses (and condemns) people who fiercely hate Russia and the Russian nation. The question being discussed is how such persons get into the upper echelons of power, in this case the media, who appoints them there and diligently supports them.
    But these people are diligently supported and, I would say, fed by the same haters of Russia, but in the echelons of a different government - bureaucratic, bureaucratic.
    Zhirinovsky said it right: this is monstrous!
  65. +2
    17 December 2015 15: 03
    Andronov is a stsuka fan of Kalomoiskag, I won’t be surprised that he will collect money for the punishers of Azov and Donbass. It’s over.
  66. 0
    17 December 2015 15: 44
    Only one question arises: who is t...ing Tina, since she behaves like such a greyhound? In general, this idle and unrestrained S....., forgive me, the person has always been disgusting to me. These people need to be kicked out of the air and from the media in general!
  67. +1
    17 December 2015 17: 59
    With such “frames” the channel turns into a sewer negative
  68. 0
    17 December 2015 18: 50
    I'm so sad, I stopped going to Russia 2 channel.
  69. 0
    17 December 2015 19: 54
    I fully support Mikhalkov.
  70. 0
    17 December 2015 20: 16
    But in my opinion, Mikhalkov fell into a hole that he himself helped dig for the last 25 years. Clan politics in action.
  71. 0
    17 December 2015 20: 18
    I am not delighted with S. Mikhalkov’s lordship, but here he is one hundred percent right. We do not have VGTRK, but RDG, an enemy reconnaissance and sabotage group on OUR TV channels, which we taxpayers pay for. And now they have spat in the faces of all Russians. This comes from a feeling of complete impunity, because... I don’t believe in their courage. So why.
  72. 0
    17 December 2015 20: 24
    Another hangout of the “fifth column”!
  73. 0
    17 December 2015 22: 29
    But Gavnopolsky never denied that he wears women’s underwear (as Anatoly Shariy said)
    smile wassat
  74. 0
    17 December 2015 23: 29
    Under the hammers of all Russophobes!!!
  75. 0
    18 December 2015 07: 32
    Match TV has long gone into the furnace!
  76. 0
    18 December 2015 08: 27
    What happens, a person is a public fan of sports at a stadium, is he still thinking of selling himself at a higher price? But in general, the person is sick and has complexes, judging by the photo.
  77. 0
    18 December 2015 09: 19
    May Tina burn in Hell!!! am
  78. -2
    18 December 2015 10: 01
    The author is the hero - "East Wind"! If you are afraid, hiding under a pseudonym, then you probably shouldn’t write such a “dangerous” article. No matter what happens! True truth-tellers do not hide their faces....
    1. +1
      18 December 2015 22: 40
      Dear Glashenka! I have never hidden my name. Go to your profile and see everything. But I'm afraid that you don't want it...
      1. 0
        19 December 2015 07: 16
        Well, you should sign up! Why nod at the profile...
        1. 0
          19 December 2015 09: 59
          Sorry, I didn’t know that you need to find out about the right to sign...
  79. 0
    18 December 2015 10: 31
    Unfortunately, I sometimes have to watch this channel, only it broadcasts Formula 1, and I watch non-Russian EU ones and, frankly, I regret that we don’t have channels of this level, where there is only sports, without an admixture of glamor and politics.
  80. 0
    18 December 2015 12: 15
    Quote: EvilBlacker
    Unfortunately, I sometimes have to watch this channel, only it broadcasts Formula 1, and I watch non-Russian EU ones and, frankly, I regret that we don’t have channels of this level, where there is only sports, without an admixture of glamor and politics.

    So can you please tell me that the employees of this channel express their political views during broadcasts of sports programs? or do they do it privately? If in private, then what does the entire purely sports channel Match-TV with all its employees have to do with it? I just didn’t hear any political discussions during the broadcasts, but since I don’t watch it often I could have missed something...
    1. 0
      18 December 2015 13: 25
      Quote: Dimon-chik-79
      Quote: EvilBlacker
      Unfortunately, I sometimes have to watch this channel, only it broadcasts Formula 1, and I watch non-Russian EU ones and, frankly, I regret that we don’t have channels of this level, where there is only sports, without an admixture of glamor and politics.

      So can you please tell me that the employees of this channel express their political views during broadcasts of sports programs? or do they do it privately? If in private, then what does the entire purely sports channel Match-TV with all its employees have to do with it? I just didn’t hear any political discussions during the broadcasts, but since I don’t watch it often I could have missed something...

      Have you looked at Nikita Sergeevich? It's all said there. Twitter, as well as other blogs and social networks, is not private correspondence. I read S. Kurdyukov, V. Sinitsyn and have not seen any political statements from them, and when asked about politics, I myself heard Sinitsyn’s answer: “There is no need to mix sports with politics.” - This is how it should be for a real sports commentator. It’s trite, but a commentator is the face/voice of the channel, and when this person insults people, and the producer essentially scolds him, it automatically casts a shadow on the entire channel, plus Match-TV seems to belong to the NTV holding, which also goes to channel passive.
  81. 0
    18 December 2015 14: 41
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    no, this tinochka is inviolable ... and you can’t call it on the site by its real name.

    Which one? By the full name of Tinatin? wink Does mentioning the real name Kandelaki cause infernal forces in our world? wassat

    if you repeat five times in a row in the toilet then yes
  82. VB
    0
    18 December 2015 14: 55
    The liberals under the current government are sacred cows, inviolable. Mikhalkov can be banned, but this gang can never be banned. Chubais can plunder all of Russia, nothing will happen to him, but let one of the patriots try to get caught in the “bubble” even with a bribe and rot in prison. The Serdyukovs and Vasilievs are inviolable, and the damage from them is like a good war. Well, the power is theirs now, I hope for now...
  83. 0
    18 December 2015 14: 58
    Thanks to Nikita Sergeevich. This is the “elite” - the leading and directing personnel!!! Both Tina and Andronov don’t like Russians and Russia. Kick them out of work and let the lawyers work. Maybe there is something to show? And there’s nothing to say about Ganopolsky. Speaking of personnel, today’s VO article “Social elevator as a panacea for Russia’s modern problems, or How to remove those who are not with us”
  84. 0
    18 December 2015 15: 25
    Quote: Banshee
    Mistress of a pig farm. Ober-cowgirl, so to speak.

    and Tina herself looks like she has scarlet fever Yes
    I looked at Mikhalkov, he threw it at him normally, it’s just right for the Gavnopolsky topizzo bully
  85. 0
    18 December 2015 17: 42
    TV channel Match is in 3rd place! button. Everyone's attention to this channel is known. Of course, he doesn't interest me. Why was Russia-2 removed? I understand that they are working for someone. And then Tina Kandilaki showed up. Is it clear now. Let us remain silent about what she is like as a leader. This is her personal business. But the vile behavior of her personally and her subordinate causes outrage!
    What Andronov gave out was a shock! It doesn’t matter what kind of person he is, there are plenty of such scoundrels, but his Twitter gem speaks volumes. Without going into details, you can imagine WHO is covering up this whole camarilla: Kandilaki, Andronov and others like them... Why was there a story about this sensational story in Pushkov’s program in the evening, but in the morning it disappeared somewhere. A. Pushkov - deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation - is not a fool. He has enough powers and he is undoubtedly an influential person. And look, look, he has bigger fish to fry: the shadow of a more powerful official flashed over him. And N. Mikhalkov is not a timid person; he communicates with Putin.
    Therefore, someone from the Government turned the situation down. It turns out that the rubbish Andronov rudely and obscenely showed fierce hatred of the Russian world, offending millions of people, and they pitied him for it!
    How disgusting! I think that Kandilaki, Andronov and whoever else is there are obliged to leave TV. But it would be absolutely correct to bring these citizens to criminal liability under the article for inciting ethnic hatred. This is so relevant now. Kandilaki is like a Georgian?... Now, let him explain himself to the Russian people and ask for a public apology.
    And it would be right to remove this match channel to the 39th button...
  86. 0
    18 December 2015 17: 58
    I used to watch this channel. Film screenings mostly. After it was remade into a certain Match... I stopped watching. And I'll remove it from the button. The master is another matter. He himself got dirty up to his ears, and now he squeaked offended. We need to drive out the Russophobic riffraff. And immediately!
  87. 0
    18 December 2015 18: 53
    These are not pig farms or pig farms. These are your enemies, the Russians, including Russians. And what needs to be discussed is not Match TV and its staff, but those people who put them on the air, who openly or covertly support your enemies for your money.
  88. +1
    18 December 2015 20: 03
    The Russian Spirit has begun to rise and this infuriates the Russophobes, but many nervous disorders still await them...
  89. 0
    18 December 2015 23: 18
    Quote: EvilBlacker
    Have you looked at Nikita Sergeevich? It's all said there. Twitter, as well as other blogs and social networks, is not private correspondence. I read S. Kurdyukov, V. Sinitsyn and have not seen any political statements from them, and when asked about politics, I myself heard Sinitsyn’s answer: “There is no need to mix sports with politics.” - This is how it should be for a real sports commentator. It’s trite, but a commentator is the face/voice of the channel, and when this person insults people, and the producer essentially scolds him, it automatically casts a shadow on the entire channel, plus Match-TV seems to belong to the NTV holding, which also goes to channel passive.

    You watch football, watch hockey, Formula 1, but don’t go to Twitter, don’t)))!!! It seems to me that in this topic, we have spent too much time on those who do not deserve it at all.
    Watch sports, play sports! Peace to you! Don't watch Twitter!
  90. +1
    18 December 2015 23: 18
    Honestly, I’ve been reading the comments on this site for a long time and I’m getting gloomier and gloomier...

    But this is the Lyrics now on topic. I don't watch TV at all. I have no time or desire, since I work in this field and know how the material is created. I love watching good football. I don’t place bets, I don’t drink in front of a box of beer, while wearing shorts and other trash was not observed. There used to be such a channel as NTV Football, 3, Russia 2 and several others that broadcast football. And the quality was lame, but progress was visible - everything was developing and improving... the match channel recently appeared. Honestly, if it weren’t for this article, I wouldn’t even know who the director was and who was Russophobe...I honestly don’t care. The broadcasts have become better in terms of pictures, and the comments from politicians in football have never been heard from commentators in many years of watching sports. TV... why all the fuss can someone tell me, otherwise I simply don’t understand most of the site’s visitors....
    1. 0
      19 December 2015 07: 33
      I figured out the issue... Leave the channel. fuck the Georgian girl and her sows...there are better commentators....
  91. +1
    2 January 2016 19: 27
    I am sure that a Russian is not only one who was born of Russian origin, but also one who grew up in Russian culture, accepts it and considers himself one with it!!! At all times, there have been rulers who destroyed Rus', the Soviet Union and Russia, but there were and are those who created it anew, and these are the ones you want to bow to, thank, and walk with him on the same path to the end. Liberals are needed not by Russia, but by Europe and America, to destroy, not create. Believe me, I have been living in Europe for 15 years and here for a long time they have been showing not what is happening, but what is profitable to show, often against Russia and of course trampling on the right of citizens to know what is really happening! And Ganapolsky, of course, knows that it’s all a fake, he’s just earning his place in the sun! I think he just has an innate hatred of everything Russian, and besides, it’s more convenient to be good for the West and America. But I didn’t expect it from Channel 24, or TVC. People pay money and they do this to them... In Europe, tolerance almost brought it to collapse. The common people in Europe believe in Russia, but there are also those who believe in the Ganapolskys... and because of them they think that Russia is evil. Although we see how a citizen of Ukraine Ganapolsky talks to his listeners, well, not at all in a European way!!! How can such a person speak about justice??? N.S. Mikhalkov speaks correctly, honestly, and of course many people don’t like it, do you think he needs fame or money, no, he has everything, I believe him, his soul is rooting for Russia and the entire people of Russia. I say this not as a Russian, but as a Russian who does not have Russian blood, but I feel like I am part of Russia!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"