There are no apartments for patriots in Sevastopol

111
There are no apartments for patriots in SevastopolThe family of the Sevastopol marine, who died in Syria, was given an apartment in Yalta. He dreamed of living in Sevastopol, but the city authorities and developers close to them did not offer housing to the widow and the hero’s orphaned child. Moreover, they do not even want to talk about him - “for reasons of patriotism”.

The family of the marine infantryman Alexander Pozychnich, who died in Syria, was presented with an apartment in Gurzuf, Kryminform reports. The document on state registration of the right to an apartment to a widow of a serviceman, Irina Pozynic, was presented by a representative of the Yalta administration Anatoly Elyasin at Novocherkassk school No. XXUMX during the opening ceremony of memorial plaques in honor of her graduates who were posthumously awarded orders of Courage, Alexander Pozynic and Evgenia Nosov.

“All the inhabitants of the peninsula sincerely sympathize with your grief and are experiencing these terrible days with you. We perfectly understand that it is impossible to make up your loss. But we know that Alexander dreamed of living with his family in the Crimea. That is why the leadership of the Crimea, the city of Yalta and the business circles of the Yalta region decided to fulfill the dream of your husband - a brave warrior and a worthy citizen of our country, ”addressed the widow of Elyasin.

He gave her condolences on behalf of the head of the administration of Yalta, Andrei Rostenko, and presented a certificate of state registration of the right to an apartment with a total area of ​​55,6 square meters, located in the village of Gurzuf.

“We sincerely hope that this gift will help your family to gain new strength, confidence and faith in the bright future for which your husband lived. Thanks for the feat. The bright memory of the true hero of Russia, ”said Elyasin.

Alexander Poznich died 24 on November 2015 of the year during a combat mission to rescue Russian pilots in Syria: the helicopter on which Poznich flew to search for the escaped Turkish-shot pilot SU-24 was fired from the ground by pro-Turkish militants. For his heroism Poznich was awarded the Order of Courage posthumously.

Well, honor and praise to Yalta officials.

Meanwhile, as reported by the federal media in November 25, Alexander Pozychnich dreamed of living not in Yalta, but in Sevastopol. "Notes" then also published about it. news. “This is Alexander's second marriage. From the first he has a child. With Irina, they have been together for five years, they have a son, ”says an acquaintance of the Pozychnits family. - Sasha is a poor fellow, he could not sit in one place for a long time. Yes, and chose a profession not for the lazy. When started story with the Crimea, he was transferred there. He went to serve under the contract. The house almost did not appear. My wife missed him. Alexander planned to stay in Sevastopol, he thought, get an apartment there and bring his family to the Crimea. ”

We will venture to suggest that it was from the media that Yalta officials learned about the desire of the Pozychnich family to live on the peninsula. And that was what Anatoly Elyasin meant when he said: “We know that Alexander dreamed of living with his family in the Crimea”.

But again - Alexander dreamed of living in Sevastopol. This is not surprising: here, in the Cossack Bay, the 810 brigade of the Marine Corps is located, where he served, and it would be easier for the wife to work here. Yes, and housing is much cheaper than on the southern coast of Crimea. Moreover, in Gurzuf, where there is almost no free land and where square meters are valued much higher.

Then why did Poznich’s widow and orphaned child not given shelter by the officials of Sevastopol, who, in any incomprehensible situation, were accustomed to clutching at their patriotism red at the touch?

The same 56 squares in the city of Russian glory would cost the donators inexpensively. Especially if the Korsun charitable foundation had joined the business, in the board of trustees of which, together with the plenipotentiary and the governor, consists the largest developer, the former defense minister of Ukraine Pavel Lebedev. Already, he, throwing out a lot of money every day to publish the Admiral newspaper with the profiles of Menyaylo and Nakhimov, could allocate an apartment to the family of the hero at cost. Where? Yes, even in Laspi Bay. You look, and questions about its illegal building would be less.

But no, they did not give the family of the Marines serving in Sevastopol anything. Moreover, they do not even want to talk about Pazynich. At the end of November, when news of his death reached Sevastopol, ForPost journalist Dmitry Osipenko asked the governor Sergey Menaylo if he knew that Alexander Pozychnich served in Sevastopol. By this time, he had already been informed about by the federal media, and Dmitry needed an official comment. In response, Menyaylo categorically demanded not inflate this topic and asked why the journalist wants to write about it at all. We are obliged to talk about the heroes, Dmitry said, especially if they live in the same city with you - this helps to educate youth patriotism. But the governor then stated that there was no patriotism in the coverage of this topic.

Apparently, the Crimean authorities acted extremely unpatriotic, giving the apartment to the hero's widow and informing about this through an agency controlled by the government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Joke. But seriously, I want to ban all Sevastopol officials to talk about patriotism. Because they have long since compromised this word.

Today, the most popular blogger in Russia, Ilya Varlamov, published another post about Sevastopol, where he recently visited. It is about the barbaric development of the city by developers close to power. The blogger writes about them as the enemies of the city, who seized Sevastopol, rather, and before all Pravoseki. “The enemy does not need a fleet, does not need historical memory, the enemy is not going to change the flags, he doesn’t care under which flags to work,” Varlamov writes. - All interest of the current enemies of the city is exclusively in the area of ​​square meters. It is very clearly visible in the city. In Sevastopol, nothing at all is being done that cannot be quickly sold with a good profit. ”

Well yes. Quickly sell with a good profit and give - not the same thing.

The “Notes” wanted to contact Sergey Menyaylo and ask him to comment on the deed of Yalta residents, but he did not pick up the phone. Vice-Governor Yevgeny Dubovik replied that he had a reception day and he had no time.
111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    15 December 2015 09: 11
    Some defend their homeland, while other state money is sawing, as old as the world, to each his own ... we all walk under God ...
    1. +13
      15 December 2015 09: 16
      Interestingly, how long have these "good" officials "been at the helm" and "at the helm of the authorities"?
      These are the "new Crimean" or from the "former", caring for a single UkrAina ?!
      1. -3
        15 December 2015 15: 09
        exceptionally for bureaucrats it is necessary to make exceptions for the articles of execution ... I love my country so much and hate the state !!!
    2. +44
      15 December 2015 09: 25
      Quote: Sanya Rus
      Some defend their homeland, while other state money is sawing, as old as the world, to each his own ... we all walk under God ...

      Relatives were given an apartment in Gurzuf. The media found out that the guy wanted to live in Crimea. AND GIVEN an apartment in a RESORT village. WHAT ARE YOU WRONG?
      1. +40
        15 December 2015 09: 31
        Quote: Mitek
        Quote: Sanya Rus
        Some defend their homeland, while other state money is sawing, as old as the world, to each his own ... we all walk under God ...

        Relatives were given an apartment in Gurzuf. The media found out that the guy wanted to live in Crimea. AND GIVEN an apartment in a RESORT village. WHAT ARE YOU WRONG?

        Here it is in the article. The author took it and turned everything inside out. Already they gave the apartment and that is bad.
        1. +7
          15 December 2015 10: 05
          and what is bad Gurzuf? Beautiful city
        2. 0
          15 December 2015 10: 25
          And you try to find work in Gurzuf
          1. +8
            15 December 2015 10: 52
            Quote: mast
            And you try to find work in Gurzuf

            Have you rushed from Gurzuf to Estonia?
            1. +5
              15 December 2015 11: 32
              Why do you? Why With Gurzuf, and not FROM Gurzuf? And why didn’t you notice that this is a vile anonym?
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. +8
            15 December 2015 11: 01
            I'm sorry they sold the apartment or presented? !!!
            there would be a desire to find
            I don’t want to say anything, we give apartments to all the families of the dead military ?!
            give take don't like refuse
          3. +6
            15 December 2015 11: 55
            let her take it to vacationers and receive no less than a salary in Sevastopol. damn they gave an apartment and Thank God, at the same time at the resort. author of the article balamut.
        3. +7
          15 December 2015 11: 17
          Vend
          Here I read and also it was just the impression that everything turned inside out.
          Especially interesting is written about the fact that in Sevastopol sq.m. cheaper and for this, too, it seems like they criticize that it is more expensive in Gurzuf, well, you don’t like living in Gurzuf, they will sell and buy in Sevastopol and the money will remain ...
          Not very correct article
        4. 0
          15 December 2015 13: 58
          Quote: Wend
          Here it is in the article. The author took it and turned everything inside out. Already they gave the apartment and that is bad.

          ---------------------
          Even didn’t understand, they gave an apartment in Crimea? Dali. Developers in the Crimea is a completely different song, this is for Natasha Poklonskaya, even if she is dealing with developers. And then everything is in a heap of widows, developers, corruption, patriotism. They did not deceive with the apartment.
      2. +12
        15 December 2015 09: 52
        Quote: Mitek
        The media found out that the guy wanted to live in Crimea

        Alexander planned to stay in Sevastopol, he thought he would get an apartment there and transport the family to the Crimea. "

        Guys .. do not swear. It's good that they were given in a resort village, just a "small detail", since I dreamed of staying in Sevastopol, I had to give it in Sevastopol. This is his dream that has not come true and it is more convenient for a small child to go to a kindergarten or school in Sevastopol than in a resort village .. probably something like this.
        All kinds of articles are written and with their remarks they can ruin any business. Honor and praise to those who tried and allocated an apartment in the resort village and, most importantly, that his family is now in agreement and contentment.
        1. +7
          15 December 2015 10: 16
          Quote: Scoun
          Quote: Mitek
          The media found out that the guy wanted to live in Crimea

          Alexander planned to stay in Sevastopol, he thought he would get an apartment there and transport the family to the Crimea. "

          Guys .. do not swear. It's good that they were given in a resort village, just a "small detail", since I dreamed of staying in Sevastopol, I had to give it in Sevastopol. This is his dream that has not come true and it is more convenient for a small child to go to a kindergarten or school in Sevastopol than in a resort village .. probably something like this.

          If he was alive, then the family (he, wife and children) would be better in Sevastopol. Now he is gone. But there is a widow and a child. And what should they do next to the military? And then, they themselves can decide where they feel better. In the end they will sell in Gurzuf, move to Sevastopol.
      3. -6
        15 December 2015 10: 12
        Quote: Mitek
        Quote: Sanya Rus
        Some defend their homeland, while other state money is sawing, as old as the world, to each his own ... we all walk under God ...

        Relatives were given an apartment in Gurzuf. The media found out that the guy wanted to live in Crimea. AND GIVEN an apartment in a RESORT village. WHAT ARE YOU WRONG?

        And it’s not so because Alexander wanted to live in Sevastopol and not to grow apple trees on Mars. Then everything would have been type top, and the soulless administration that did not care about the hero’s family and the vile state sent for the sure death (at gunpoint of machine guns of bloody gebni) of the father of the family, etc., etc.
        1. +4
          15 December 2015 11: 04
          Quote: pv1005
          a vile state that sent for certain death (at gunpoint with machine guns of bloody gebni) the father of the family, etc., etc.

          You will probably be surprised, but Voy's profession is that sometimes they die for their state and that is why they deserve respect, but as soon as they begin to reproach "they say we die" it causes an extreme degree of disrespect and a person from the Elite turns into mud
          1. +4
            15 December 2015 11: 13
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            Quote: pv1005
            a vile state that sent for certain death (at gunpoint with machine guns of bloody gebni) the father of the family, etc., etc.

            You will probably be surprised, but Voy's profession is that sometimes they die for their state and that is why they deserve respect, but as soon as they begin to reproach "they say we die" it causes an extreme degree of disrespect and a person from the Elite turns into mud

            So for the reason that some kind of magazine girl interferes with the name of the deceased hero with dirt pursuing his not at all selfless goals (simply fulfilling someone’s order). It takes advantage of the fact that the dead can not answer.
      4. +1
        15 December 2015 11: 04
        Quote: Mitek
        Relatives were given an apartment in Gurzuf. The media found out that the guy wanted to live in Crimea

        I was there several years ago, it’s good there, but with work I really think there will be tough tensions. For a woman with a small child, it will be difficult, there is little free land (minus a garden), the town is located on a mountainside with a rather steep descent.
    3. +18
      15 December 2015 09: 57
      I re-read the article several times. About what? Just to write all nonsense. I would have banned this scribbler, they gave the family an apartment in Gurzuf, what's wrong? Surely everything was misinterpreted, scribbler. I served, the guys died, they didn’t really give apartments, and did not complain, they didn’t die for meters. And then they gave it - and again not like that. It's disgusting to read.
    4. The comment was deleted.
      1. +5
        15 December 2015 10: 18
        Quote: Umnichka
        They gave the apartment to the family, in Gurzuf,

        Probably the majority simply do not know what Gurzuf is (I am one of them) and everyone knows Sevastopol and hence there is an additional "effect" of indignation.
        Personally, I did not know that Gurzuf is cool, I just never was on the Black Sea. (((
        And such scribblers as the aftyr of the current article .. really in the ban.
        1. +3
          15 December 2015 11: 02
          But again - Alexander dreamed of living in Sevastopol. This is not surprising: here, in the Cossack Bay, the 810 brigade of the Marine Corps is located, where he served, and it would be easier for the wife to work here. Yes, and housing is much cheaper than on the southern coast of Crimea. Moreover, in Gurzuf, where there is almost no free land and where square meters are valued much higher.

          So what's the problem? They sold more expensive in Gurzuf, bought cheaper in Sevastopol and no problems! The article is therefore a minus.
        2. SSR
          +1
          15 December 2015 20: 35
          Quote: Scoun
          Quote: Umnichka
          They gave the apartment to the family, in Gurzuf,

          Probably the majority simply do not know what Gurzuf is (I am one of them) and everyone knows Sevastopol and hence there is an additional "effect" of indignation.
          Personally, I did not know that Gurzuf is cool, I just never was on the Black Sea. (((
          And such scribblers as the aftyr of the current article .. really in the ban.

          Quote from S.S.R.
          The city of Sevastopol is a city of Military Glory, and the Marine Pozynich is the successor of this Military Glory and his family should live in Sevastopol and not otherwise. We destroy ourselves, in such cases there are no "trifles".

          Damn, I'm so ashamed of my narrow-minded comment ((((but I really thought that they were given an apartment in some kind of backwater (((I apologize for the comment grunting by a misunderstanding, I really thought that it was banal) "toaddressed" but here it was vice versa.
    5. +3
      15 December 2015 12: 52
      Vile little article, where does the administration of Sevastopol? He signed a contract with the Ministry of Defense, they have to take care, and a bucket of slops is poured on others, apparently they use tragedy to reduce the scores, and therefore the minuses of the article.
    6. 0
      15 December 2015 15: 55
      Quote: Sanya Rus
      Some defend their homeland, while other state money is sawing, as old as the world, to each his own ... we all walk under God ...

      Again, an idiotic comment that has nothing to do with the article and a lot of pluses under it !!! am am am
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 22: 12
        Minus silently probably from those who silently instructed the pros for an idiotic comment?
    7. -2
      15 December 2015 16: 33
      That's who, refused the widow of the Hero! The very same to send to Syria.
  2. SSR
    +8
    15 December 2015 09: 11
    The city of Sevastopol is a city of Military Glory, and the Marine Pozynich is the successor of this Military Glory and his family should live in Sevastopol and not otherwise. We destroy ourselves, in such cases there are no "trifles".
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 10: 21
      Quote from S.S.R.
      his family should live in Sevastopol and not otherwise.

      Or maybe you let the seven decide where she lives?
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 10: 45
        Minusers, ay. Well, you are not so adequate, you can’t answer, and you will forever bark from the gateway.
    2. +1
      15 December 2015 10: 22
      Sevastopol is a city of Russian sailors.
      Of the 45 cities of Military Glory in the Crimea, only Theodosius.
      Sevastopol and Kerch city heroes.
      To declare categorically
      his family should live in Sevastopol and not otherwise
      first ask the family what they want.
    3. 0
      15 December 2015 11: 49
      And why should she live in Sevastopol? And if the administration of LITTLE HOMELAND offered an apartment to the family of the deceased. Refuse?
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 15: 36
        Quote: evge-malyshev
        And if the administration of LITTLE HOMELAND offered an apartment to the family of the deceased. Refuse?

        Journalism is not a good person. In general, things are now better in the country. Let us recall how many of our brothers and friends fell into the land in Chechnya, Ossetia .... And how they lived, their families, mothers, wives, children who managed to acquire them survived. And here, I don’t want it, I want it ... The article, as if in a mud pool, was bathed.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  3. +18
    15 December 2015 09: 11
    Sorry Guy, but speculation is out of place. Where the truth, without understanding, all can be blamed.
    1. +17
      15 December 2015 09: 14
      I completely agree. And the article is similar to the order - they say how in Russia they relate to the families of deceased heroes! Guard!!!
      1. +16
        15 December 2015 09: 22
        And if they had given an apartment in Moscow, which is also bad and there is a reason for such articles to write delusional? The main thing was helped by the family with housing, and where she lives, she herself will figure it out. She will buy an even better apartment in Yalta.
      2. +2
        15 December 2015 10: 43
        Quote: Alez
        Sorry Guy, but speculation is out of place. Where the truth, without understanding, all can be blamed.

        And in the garrison of Vozzhaevka, where O.A. Peshkov began to serve, they did not divide into friends and strangers and set up two memorial plaques: Lt. Col. Peshkov.O.A and Alexander Pozynichhttp: //www.rsva.ru/content/v-priamure- ustanovili-memorialnye-doski-v-che
        st-olega-peshkova-i-aleksandra-pozynicha
        Here is the link to the news.
    2. +5
      15 December 2015 09: 16
      Especially when all sorts of Varlamovs get involved.
      1. +29
        15 December 2015 09: 30
        Sorry, but I didn’t quite understand! If my ex-husband died (God forbid) and, for example, would like to live in an apartment overlooking the Kremlin, would they give me this apartment ?! I understand everything and sympathize with the family of the deceased, but there is no need to distort them, but what about the families of the victims in Afghanistan, Chechnya ?! Or are they not the same heroes as those in Syria ?! Why do not they give out apartments ?!
        1. +7
          15 December 2015 09: 41
          Quote: Diana Ilyina
          Sorry, but I didn’t quite understand!

          I support you! I read the article several times. But I still did not understand - what is actually wrong? One "juggling" with words and the theme of patriotism. Kind of good, but bad at the same time. Some blogger dragged along the way, dragged the building. Author, what did you want to use to "go", and why did you write the article? And the photo, photo does not fit in with the ending of the article.
        2. +6
          15 December 2015 10: 27
          The worst thing here is that the family does not even know about this "injustice" and this article. The journalist has worked out his 30 pieces of silver and sleeps quietly. am
  4. Boos
    -6
    15 December 2015 09: 11
    Hypocrites ... Like all current politicians and managers ...
  5. +15
    15 December 2015 09: 12
    What is this article about? Gave an apartment in Gurzuf. This is bad? Did the author even visit Crimea?
    1. +4
      15 December 2015 09: 45
      The hero’s family was deceived, was the housing much better? But in general, is it a problem to exchange Gurzuf for Sevastopol?
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      15 December 2015 09: 22
      Normal. Not one thousand fellow citizens heard in the corridors of power - I did not send you there. And here they gave the apartment all the same ...
  7. +17
    15 December 2015 09: 13
    Should I inflate this thing ???

    The author himself says that in Yalta-Gurzuf housing is more expensive than in Sevastopol ...
    And now, when the peasant-husband-father is no longer alive, does his wife need a purely military city ???

    And here is a completely different perspective of the question that the author touched upon (and isn’t this the main point of the article?) - these are the developers and authorities of the city of Russian sea glory, who put everything in the service of the golden calf ...

    PS And so I'm happy for the family of the deceased guy ... Many of the families of the deceased, it happened, in our USSR-Russia, they did not receive a tenth or even a hundredth share ...
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 09: 21
      I would like the country to not forget about the child from the first marriage.
    2. Boos
      +1
      15 December 2015 09: 26
      And the personal preferences of the widow can not be taken into account? Or are you better aware of what they need? And no apartment will compensate the dead Marine for his family.
      1. +1
        15 December 2015 12: 36
        Quote: Boos
        And the personal preferences of the widow can not be taken into account?

        And what were her preferences, enlighten us.
        Quote: Boos
        Or are you better aware of what they need?

        And you?
    3. +1
      15 December 2015 09: 41
      It is necessary that housing is received not only after the death of the father-defender-breadwinner, but also during his lifetime.
  8. 0
    15 December 2015 09: 14
    Yalta is better than Sevastopol.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. bad
    +4
    15 December 2015 09: 16
    In Sevastopol, there are probably a lot of sharply "dyed" officials who stole even when they were kaklah ... and now they are stealing ... and even more ... bad ... and just as badly PR on someone else's grief to journalists ... although maybe the motives were good ... but still don't eat right .. recourse"Notes wanted to contact Sergei Menyailo and ask him to comment on the Yalta residents' actions, but he did not pick up the phone. Vice Governor Yevgeny Dubovik replied that he had a visiting day today and he had no time." and Lavrenty Palych ...
    1. +2
      15 December 2015 11: 07
      With IVS and LBP at 9 in the morning, you would not have to talk about which 1 the secretary of the regional committee is bad, but would cheerfully sharpen a part on a machine / plow in the field ...
      This applied to everyone, and not only to the "praklyaty bureaucrats" ...
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 14: 01
        Quote: your1970
        With IVS and LПБ


        Brezhnev was Ilyich ...
        1. 0
          15 December 2015 18: 59
          Comrade Lavrenty Palych Beria recalled - and I found Leonid Ilyich lol
  11. +1
    15 December 2015 09: 17
    The deceased, eternal memory, family apartment and thanks for the gift! And who is already selling land using his official position, a prison!
  12. +2
    15 December 2015 09: 18
    The standard phrase of an official: "I didn't send you there, so what do you want from me?"
  13. +5
    15 December 2015 09: 18
    “We didn't send you there” is the painfully familiar excuse of officials.
  14. +10
    15 December 2015 09: 21
    But again - Alexander dreamed of living in Sevastopol. This is not surprising: here, in the Cossack Bay, the 810 brigade of the Marine Corps is located, where he served, and it would be easier for the wife to work here. Yes, and housing is much cheaper than on the southern coast of Crimea. Moreover, in Gurzuf, where there is almost no free land and where square meters are valued much higher. sad I don’t understand why everyone got into power? Housing where they didn’t want more and can you sell and buy it wherever you want, or I don’t understand something? and if the resort area and housing are more expensive then for that money you can probably buy 70 meters and not 50, and where you need a widow
    1. 0
      15 December 2015 09: 46
      .... I don’t understand why everyone got into power? ..

      ... It’s good to rest in Gurzuf .... But to live there ??? ... Especially in the off-season ... I want to remind you that Gurzuf almost the entire population worked in Artek and there is no other job .... In terms of life - hard .... A city is a city ... Especially large .... Schools, hospitals and shops are better and cooler .... In general, I am ashamed of the authorities of Sevastopol ....
      1. +6
        15 December 2015 10: 54
        the key phrase was "sell" where you do not like (not convenient) and buy where you want. or is such an apartment banned from sale and exchange? I think that it is unlikely, well, yes there are difficulties, but this is not a hopeless situation
  15. +6
    15 December 2015 09: 21
    It smells bad from this article, very little information. The Marine family should not suffer - this is iron, the rest is speculation.
  16. +4
    15 December 2015 09: 21
    Well, what's the problem of selling an apartment in Gurzuf and buying in Sevastopol?
    Campaign inflate and swing ...
  17. +5
    15 December 2015 09: 24
    So why such an article? Trying to tarnish power? Say she’s so bad, they forgot about the hero? But you must admit, you have not forgotten! And they gave the order and an apartment to the family, and I think the pension will be decent after the loss of a breadwinner. And the fact that they gave yes not there, but not such demagogy, they would have given in Sevastopol, it turned out to be dreaming of Moscow. They would have given in Moscow, it would have turned out to be dreaming of ruble. It just seems to me that the author of the article, hiding behind the name of the hero, is trying to de-credit the authorities.
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 10: 27
      Quote: sisa29
      So why such an article? Trying to tarnish power?

      There specifically about the Sevastopol governor Menyailo, in which the construction lawlessness, headed by the ex-Minister of Defense of Ukraine Lebedev, reached such heights that were not even in Ukraine!
      Read the forums of Sevastopol and you will see that there has never been a worse leader than Menyailo in the city!
      In general, Putin’s personnel policy in Crimea raises many questions:
      Olga Fedorovna Kovitidi - a member of the Federation Council from the Crimea - was the deputy of Kunitsin, the leader of Sevastopol, who tatally squandered Sevastopol land.
      Oleg Evgenievich Belaventsev- Putin's plenipotentiary in Crimea, the head of the well-known here to everyone, Serdyukov "Slavyanka", but personal friendship with Shoigu allows you to do absolutely everything.
      And there are most of them.
  18. +4
    15 December 2015 09: 25
    And the woman was asked where she would be better? Maybe she herself wanted Yalta.
  19. +8
    15 December 2015 09: 26
    Some kind of nasty article, and the apartment seemed to be given for money more expensive than in Sevastopol, and they did not forget about the family (by the way, the wife is silent), but I found a worried article writing - she earns ratings. What the writer needs to do is change the apartment - well, it seems there are no problems. Identify the problem - and which one? empty article.
  20. Riv
    +6
    15 December 2015 09: 26
    The soldier’s widow was presented with an apartment. The first wife and child are entitled to a pension.
    What is the author dissatisfied with and what does the development in Sevastopol have to do with it?
    1. +4
      15 December 2015 09: 45
      Yes to the author ..., he just had to light up and raise his rating.
      "I don't like such people!" (film "Afonya")
  21. +1
    15 December 2015 09: 31
    The article is frankly ambiguous.
    The authorities of Sevastopol certainly did wrong, not good. The Yalta team is doing great. It is a pity that some covert games began to be played on behalf of the dead guys.
  22. gop
    +5
    15 December 2015 09: 33
    He dreamed of living in Sevastopol, so as to be closer to the service, and in Gurzuf, where his wife would be better off, an article provocation
  23. +2
    15 December 2015 09: 36
    Article provocation. They say how we are not sensitive to people and their memory, and in the Crimea everything is bad. And the fact that the Crimean authorities reacted quickly, that the Yalta residents did not bother for a long time and presented an apartment? Is it bad? An article from the category "pearls are too small for someone." The person really felt support from the state in a difficult situation, and some bastard is trying to rock the boat.
  24. +2
    15 December 2015 09: 37
    I don't understand the journalist. Why try to resonate with an ordinary event? The widow received an apartment. Why is there foam? About the "barbaric development" of Sevastopol - he is not the first, not the last. Architectural bad taste, illogical and frankly rolling back development is not only a problem of Crimea.
  25. +2
    15 December 2015 09: 42
    Quote: midivan
    But again - Alexander dreamed of living in Sevastopol. This is not surprising: here, in the Cossack Bay, the 810 brigade of the Marine Corps is located, where he served, and it would be easier for the wife to work here. Yes, and housing is much cheaper than on the southern coast of Crimea. Moreover, in Gurzuf, where there is almost no free land and where square meters are valued much higher. sad I don’t understand why everyone got into power? Housing where they didn’t want more and can you sell and buy it wherever you want, or I don’t understand something? and if the resort area and housing are more expensive then for that money you can probably buy 70 meters and not 50, and where you need a widow

    I join the one who wrote these words. I want to add.
    The hero died. Maybe his wife will move to a new place? There, where they honor the memory of the Hero.
    It turns out that there are different people, different officials. This expression "Whoever gives soon will give twice."
  26. -9
    15 December 2015 09: 45
    Quote: AleksL
    Yalta is better than Sevastopol.

    yeah, and it's even better to be alive without an apartment than dead with.
    what kind of country is it that a soldier needs to die to have an apartment, they used to die for their homeland, and now for apartments ...
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 10: 34
      Quote: WHEEL
      Quote: AleksL
      Yalta is better than Sevastopol.

      yeah, and it's even better to be alive without an apartment than dead with.
      what kind of country is it that a soldier needs to die to have an apartment, they used to die for their homeland, and now for apartments ...

      And for what Ukrainian soldiers die in the anti-terrorist operation zone ????
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 11: 08
        I regretted Bandera ???
      2. 0
        15 December 2015 11: 08
        I regretted Bandera ???
    2. +4
      15 December 2015 11: 06
      I’ll tell you a secret, that is, a soldier is a serviceman, which means that it is possible that they will have to fight and die, and they know this, and if you go to a hot spot, there’s a greater chance of dying! such a profession, therefore heroes - Hero - Wikipedia
      ru.wikipedia.org ›Hero
      Hero (from other Greek: ἥρως, “valiant husband, leader”) - a man of exceptional courage and valor
  27. NUR
    +3
    15 December 2015 09: 46
    Stupid scribble, the apartment can be easily exchanged for Sevastopol what is the problem. The main thing is to change.
  28. +1
    15 December 2015 09: 51
    Wonderful specs. And most importantly - that in the article, that in the comments, marvelous logic looms. Question: how to get living space in their native country? Answer: it is necessary that the breadwinner of the family go to a hot spot, die there, then there is a chance. No other way?
    1. 0
      15 December 2015 10: 23
      not a fact, did the families of those killed in the Chechen wars receive apartments as a gift?
  29. +2
    15 December 2015 09: 59
    Quote: Seraphimamur
    The standard phrase of an official: "I didn't send you there, so what do you want from me?"

    Unfortunately, the soulless officials did not go awry, and after a year no one remembers about the widow and child. Maybe because of this phrase, grenades fly into bureaucrats' windows.
  30. -5
    15 December 2015 10: 02
    Moreover, they don’t even want to talk about him at all - “for reasons of patriotism”.


    This is how patriotism is quoted by officials, or rather not quoted! "We didn't send him", well, a very old song, but the essence is still the same: as long as you are alive and well and give to the authorities - you are needed, as soon as you are sick or dead - they completely forget!
  31. +6
    15 December 2015 10: 17
    Stupid article. Stupid to disgust. Probably in a quiet and resort Gurzuf, a widow with a child will be better than in now noisy and industrial Sevastopol. And probably the place was agreed with the family of the deceased. Moreover, the land and real estate in Gurzuf now much more expensive and prestigious. Sevstopol is full of new buildings, with empty apartments at 1000 $ per square. So if allocated in Gurzuf, then it was better for the family of the deceased. And who is this author to speak on behalf of the widow?

    Now in Sevastopol, in the direction of the 5 kilometer (district), there are dozens of new buildings. It is simply more logical to allocate apartments to active military men who need to live next to the service.
  32. +2
    15 December 2015 10: 36
    so selling it in Yalta and buying it in Sevastopol is even better, especially since the author himself says that it is more expensive in Yalta.
  33. -3
    15 December 2015 10: 49
    Surprisingly, almost no one noticed the main point of this publication! And it is as simple as three rubles and consists in the fact that the author, under such a "sauce" presented the problem of Russia's hidden enemies among the Crimean officials! It is surprising that many former high officials of Ukraine suddenly found themselves at the helm of the power structures of Sevastopol and other cities, and people who are not even friendly to Russia are flourishing in business! And here we are discussing apartments! Yes, for one statement by Mr. Menyailo that the heroic death of Marine Pozynych is not an example for instilling patriotism among the country's youth, he should be driven out of his warm governor's chair with a nasty broom! , far from worthy people. Only in one statement of Menyailo about the Marine Pozynych was revealed his entire anti-our essence! If Pozynych is not a Hero, then who then is Changeo? And we all think about what are the reasons for the failure to comply with the instructions of the President in Crimea, but they themselves drew: "... you can't hide an awl in a sack!"
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 11: 07
      Quote: kartalovkolya
      and for one statement by Mr. Menyaylo that the heroic death of Marine Pozynych is not an example for the education of patriotism among the youth of the country, he must be driven away by a filthy broom from his warm governor's chair!

      did he say that?
      where when?!!
      Can I link to the source?
  34. -3
    15 December 2015 10: 50
    Then why did the officials of Sevastopol not give housing to the widow and orphaned child of Pozynich ...

    But because in Crimea, in Sevastopol, despite the accession to Russia, what happened was at the behest of the overwhelming majority of the people who realized their long-term dream. and today in the power circles there remains a large number of officials entrenched there, who faithfully served Ukropia, planted Svidomo in Crimea and eradicated Russianness. Today they continue to spoil Russia, what we see in the attitude of Sevastopol officials to the family of the hero of Russia Pozynich! So we need a decisive cleaning of the bureaucratic apparatus from this Svidomo trash!
    1. 0
      15 December 2015 11: 09
      Quote: Goldmitro
      and today in the power circles there remains a large number of officials who have entrenched there, who faithfully served Ukropia, who planted Svidomo in the Crimea and eradicated Russianness

      can you name?
      is there any evidence, if so then you are a scoundrel and a coward, if not then a liar
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 12: 24
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        can you name?

        Covitidi!
        1. 0
          15 December 2015 14: 58

          in government circles there remains a large number of officials entrenched there, who faithfully served Ukropia, planted Svidomo in Crimea and eradicated Russianness

          Covitidi!

          proof of
          1. -1
            15 December 2015 17: 44
            Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
            in government circles there remains a large number of officials entrenched there, who faithfully served Ukropia, planted Svidomo in Crimea and eradicated Russianness
            Covitidi!
            proof of

            Google to the rescue!
            or ask this question on the forum of Sevastopol.
            http://sevastopol.su/
            1. 0
              15 December 2015 21: 18
              Quote: Askin
              Google to the rescue!

              sorry no!!!
              YOU, you personally blamed the person, so Google to help is not an answer
              with the same success, I can call you a zoophile, and everyone who does not agree with this statement, google to help
  35. +1
    15 December 2015 10: 53
    Good syuzhetets for ukroSMI: "Putin's power deceives those who give their lives for it", etc., etc.
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 10: 59
      Quote: Fuzeler
      Good syuzhetets for ukroSMI: "Putin's power deceives those who give their lives for it", etc., etc.

      After the appointment of Menyailo as head of Sevastopol, there these stories became higher than the roof.
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 11: 01
        Heard about this, and very surprised: like the admiral .....
        1. The comment was deleted.
  36. +1
    15 December 2015 11: 03
    The article is clearly provocative. Without a signature. Publication of anonymous letters on the VO should be prohibited.
  37. +1
    15 December 2015 11: 10
    All this is a well-known story, called: "I did not send you there."
  38. +6
    15 December 2015 11: 12
    An article incomprehensible at first glance. I read it. I reread it. And I did not understand the MAIN TOPIC of the material. Either the "offended family" of a soldier who has fulfilled his duty to the Motherland, or "scoundrels in Sevastopol." Everything is piled up ...
    I'll try to dissect ..

    1. Given an apartment. But actually should have? We do not discuss obligatory payments for the loss of a breadwinner; they are obligatory. But if I should provide my family with housing, I don’t know. IMHO, depends on what is written in the contract.
    2. Suppose that the provision of housing after the death of a soldier was recorded in the contract. But who was supposed to provide housing and WHERE is it written? And how much should the wishes be taken into account?
    3. The leadership of Yalta is a definite plus. There is nothing to blame them for. If the apartment was supposed to be, then they fulfilled their duty, if they were not supposed to, then there are no questions at all (we do not take into account the "moved" waiting list in this case, since the case is clearly special).
    4. It is written that the deceased wanted to live in Crimea. But that he wanted to live in Sevastopol - guesswork. And that it would be better for the family to live in Sevastopol is also only the result of reasoning. And the opinion of the family itself is somehow absent in the material. Was she asked? And the option that in Sevastopol a lot will remind of the deceased ("we walked in this park, ... we had dinner in this cafe ..", etc.) and we may not consider it unpleasant? As the saying goes, "they married me without me" ..
    5. The article contains a lot of unflattering words about the leadership of Sevastopol, who "squeezed" the apartment. Was there any appeal regarding the provision of housing? Not a word about this. Or should the "commander" of Sevastopol constantly study the press on the subject "should I give someone an apartment?" (to the delight of those on the waiting list in Sevastopol)
    6. ".." Notes "wanted to contact Sergei Menyailo and ask him to comment on the action of the Yalta residents, but he did not pick up the phone. Vice Governor Yevgeny Dubovik replied that he had a visiting day today and he had no time .." Oh how "Notes" hooked! They do not want to communicate with them !!! And about the fact that people may have a bunch of planned tasks, including which communication with the "Notes" is somehow not planned and no thought arises ... questions? IMHO, the officials did the right thing to ignore your "Wishlist".

    After dissecting the article, I have the only conclusion: the purpose of its writing is to throw mud at the leadership of the city of Sevastopol. And to dramatize the situation, the deceased marine and his family were "used".
    I fully admit that at the Sevastopol helm there are not quite, say, clean people, but the cleanliness of those who wrote about them, IMHO, is even lower.

    zs It is impossible to do "clean" work with dirty hands and with a dirty soul. The result will come out dirty too. That this material also confirms.
    1. +1
      15 December 2015 11: 23
      Quote: tolancop
      Read. Re-read. And I did not understand the BASIC TOPIC of the material.

      Thanks for the detailed comment. I support.
    2. +2
      15 December 2015 11: 51
      Does Menyailo still lead Sevastopol? Then Sevastopol must get ready for the next defense!
    3. +2
      15 December 2015 13: 00
      Following ...
      Earlier I wrote that there are no questions to the leaders of Yalta. We do not have. But for a bunch of verifiers, I'm afraid they may. By providing housing to the Marine's family, the city authorities have probably violated the rights of the waiting list and a bunch of regulations. I believe that they knew this, but nevertheless they took such a step, for which, I hope, they will be reckoned with ... And I wish that all sorts of "hooks" on this matter did not twitch their nerves ...
      1. 0
        15 December 2015 19: 30
        Quote: tolancop
        In pursuit ... I believe that they knew this, but nevertheless they took such a step, for which, I hope, they will be reckoned with ... And I wish that all sorts of "hooks" would not rattle their nerves on this occasion ...

        Well, this is coming, I think) Municipal funds (not only housing, I think) are already waiting for an audit, probably)
  39. +1
    15 December 2015 11: 21
    I don’t understand what’s wrong. In Gurzuf much more beautiful and cleaner than in Sevastopol, the air is a fairy tale, juniper, sea, and what kind of window. That is why housing on the South Coast is many times more expensive. I would like to Sevastopol, not a problem! Sell ​​56 m2 and buy 80m2 in Sevastopol, this apartment will be torn apart with your hands for a lot of money.
  40. +4
    15 December 2015 11: 24
    It’s a cheap, worthless article. It has become commonplace in Russia that journalists make copies of themselves from someone else’s grief. It’s bad that the family was given an apartment in Yalta and not in Sevastopol. Did the journalist ask the widow of the marine. Is she happy with the housing provided. It seems that no He decided, as it were, on her behalf to complain that the deceased wanted to live in Sevastopol, but they didn’t give it. How disgusting it is to stick your nose into other people's fates. It is even worse that a reputable publication like Military Review prints all kinds of crooks and villains.
  41. -1
    15 December 2015 11: 32
    As always, they make a revolution of romance, and the villains take advantage of it.
  42. +1
    15 December 2015 12: 03
    Quote: serezhasoldatow
    Have you lived there in winter?

    in Gurzuf then? =) Only there would live =)
  43. -1
    15 December 2015 12: 10
    The topic of the article is understandable, but distorted by thoughts. The author seems to be more worried not for the family of the deceased marine, but for the development of Sevastopol by local authorities. We must first understand what the family lost when changing their place of residence, and then to argue whether there was a place or not found in Sevastopol. Of course, if the new conditions in Yalta are unacceptable, then everything is fair.
  44. -1
    15 December 2015 12: 14
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    can you name?
    is there any evidence, if so then you are a scoundrel and a coward, if not then a liar

    This is reported by the Crimeans themselves! You need to be calm, otherwise choke on your saliva in a fit of indignation!
  45. +1
    15 December 2015 12: 36
    Blessed memory of the fallen war! But all these movements are not clear! It does not at all mention that the Pozynich family and Alexander himself are from Novocherkassk. He left the contract from Novocherkassk, was buried on the Walk of Fame in the city of Novocherkassk, named school number 17 by his name in Novocherkassk, his parents live here. And the story about the apartment in Sevastopol. Everything is somehow strange.
  46. ZKB
    +1
    15 December 2015 13: 03
    Negative article. nonsense. The warrior died, eternal glory to the hero, the earth rest in peace. where does it give his family? They were given in a normal place, and the family itself will figure out how to dispose of the apartment, where to sell, where to buy, where to live. Many were not given at all .. I just think the point of this article is to crap everything. Like they didn’t give, although they gave, they gave not there, etc. Bullshit, the main thing is not abandoned the family, taken care of. and who knows what and where the wife wanted ????
  47. 0
    15 December 2015 13: 07
    Actually, the name of the Marine's hero is just "roof" for the author's account of this article. The main thing is Crimea! The main thing is to pour more shit on the leaders of the cities of the peninsula! The normal life of the Crimeans is haunted. All kinds of hangers-on cannot sleep well ... But the dog barks, and the caravan moves on.
  48. +1
    15 December 2015 13: 28
    Quote: mast
    And you try to find work in Gurzuf

    And you try to find it not in the regional center of Russia. Gurzuf is a resort city in the Crimea.
  49. +3
    15 December 2015 13: 47
    The article is another example of distortion, distortion and vulgarization of information.
    Now, on the names of our heroes, such journalistic scumbags will once again play, do PR for themselves, and manipulate people's minds.
    The family was given an apartment, a nice apartment, in a good area, but ....... there is a bunch of all sorts of these but, in order to find some kind of non-existent chernukha, and to attract even more dirt and abomination to it. They would have given an apartment in Sevastopol, but it would have turned out that they had given a kopeck piece, but I wanted three rubles. gave three rubles, but the rooms are combined, but it would have been separate. The governor is an ambassador of some kind of journalist. You have seen how sometimes people are "interviewed" by such magazines. After such an "interview" you can't wash off the dirt.
    I don’t want to say anything about good journalists, but the article is simply teeming and doesn’t even smell, but it just stinks like these scum-zhurnalyugi.
    Dmitry Osipenko http://vk.com/dimitrosevastopol
    Ilya Varlamov http://varlamov.ru/
    I understand that a face is not always an indicator of the quality of a person, but at the sight of such faces it really becomes uncomfortable. And if you go and read what these "journalists" and bloggers write, you really just don't want to live.
  50. -1
    15 December 2015 13: 55
    Or maybe the article is compromising on bureaucrats? But where and in what? Without knowing the opinions of the widow, there is nothing to judge.
  51. 0
    15 December 2015 15: 22
    (C) “The enemy does not need a fleet, does not need historical memory, the enemy is not going to change flags, he doesn’t care what flags he works under (C)

    No, the enemy doesn’t care what flag you work under. He prefers under his own, under the enemy. “History is rewritten by the victors” and the flags are changed along with it. They do this all the time in order to deprive people of their memory and roots, and accordingly minimize protests against their enemy government.
  52. -1
    15 December 2015 16: 17
    again propaganda about crying! What nonsense did he want to live there but he died! glory and memory to him! and my wife was given an apartment in a resort town! the one who wrote this article is morally trying to make black out of white and turn everything inside out! for some reason he asked his neighbor and not his wife and who knows whose neighbor! my wife was given an apartment in Yalta, a famous resort where people dream of going on vacation, but here they gave her an apartment, and the author writes that Gurzuf is almost the most wretched place on earth!
  53. -1
    15 December 2015 17: 06
    There is a normal nomenklatura squabble between the administrations of Crimea and Sevastopol on the topic of “who will eat who.” Sevastopol was either greedy or snapped its beak, Crimea took advantage of this, at the same time promoting itself with the help of a friendly journalist. That's it, I retold the article.
  54. 0
    15 December 2015 18: 44
    1) If you killed your husband and dad, then where is which apartment is a matter of the 20th. Why this everyday confusion when the widow and children are already so bitter?

    2) In the form of an apartment in Yalta, the family was given an apartment and a car in Sevastopol. All that remains is to choose and buy, sell and exchange. Or (which is more profitable) - rent out an apartment and sometimes live there yourself. Stable profits in the event of the loss of the head of the family are only beneficial...
  55. 0
    17 December 2015 00: 01
    Complete nonsense. Knowing where the sailor wanted to live, they would have given him an apartment there, even with a view of the Kremlin. My opinion is that the commanders thought for the best. They gave it without stint.